ECC plan issue

On running an ECC plan with resource constraint only, planned orders are getting generated at the end of planning horizon, though there is demand next week.
Details
Demand for a bom item of qty 2 on 28th May. Routing for this item has a resource with usage of 12 Hr. so 2 qty should get schedule on a day.There are components in BOM with max purchasing lead time of 7 days only. Planned order is getting generated with Need by date of 28-May but Sugg start and Due date of 10-Dec-2010 (end of planning horizon)
Please suggest what is driving this behaviour.

We had similar issue with ECC plan. We were using a common resource (which was not CTP enabled), on all routings for lead time rollup calculation. We also have some capacity resources.
To resolve the issue, we created a resource group and added it to all capacity resources. In the ECC plan for the 'Calculate Resource Requirements' we selected 'Bottleneck Resource' and included the Resource Group.
This resolve our issue.
If you are using similar setup, this will help.
We have another issue under the thread 'ECC Plan Resource Availability is Considered before Component is Available' in the forum. We appreciate any help in this.
Regards,
Vijay

Similar Messages

ECC Plan Resource Availability is Considered before Component is Available.

Hi All,
We have an issue with GOP and ASCP Resource Availability.
We are using ECC plan with 'Calculate Resource Requirement' option enabled. Current version is R12.1.1
Issue:
Component and Resource together are required to make a subassembly.
Component is available on 31st August. For example, resource will be used only after 31st of August as component is not available before that. GOP/CTP is considering resource availability before 31st of August (before the component is available). Resource availability is being calculated from plan run date.
What we expect:
Since component is available on 31st of August, resource (which is available 8 hours per day, 6 days a week) should be used from 31st of August and thus should give us completion date somewhere in first week of October (for 207.816 hours requirement of resource: 26 working days, after 31st of August) for subassembly.
But the resource capacity availability is being considered from current date and since there is no other demand, the resource availability from today is being considred. We want the capacity to be considered from the component availability date.
Did anyone encounter this problem before or this is an intended functionality?
Your help is highly appreciated.
Thanks.
Vijay
Edited by: user10836534 on Jun 1, 2010 5:50 PM
Edited by: user10836534 on Jun 1, 2010 5:51 PM

Hi Partha,
Thanks for the reply. The resource availability is not just visible but also used by ASCP in calculations.
For example in our case we have resource availability of 8 hours per day and inverse usage is 100 items per hour for a subassembly, there is no other demand, no supply. Subassembly lead time is 1 day. The component for the subassembly is available 12 days from today. For ATP inquiry of 8000 qty of the subassembly, the available date should be 23 days from today (Component available on 12th Day, and starts processing 800 qty per day for the next 10 days for a total qty of 8000 + subassembly lead time of 1 day).
The ATP inquiry is suggesting availability of subassembly as 13th Day from today. Pegging shows resource requirement of 80 hours and this is shown available 10 days from today. Component is available on 12th day and it takes 1 day for the subassembly completion.
ASCP is using resource availability from current date even if this resource cannot be used until the component is available.
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks.
Vijay

Planned issue

Hi,
We are usig REM scenario. We require a report which shows the actual issues & planned issues for the components & the variance. Actual issues ca be obtained from table MSEG through movement types. How to get planned issues considering that a component may be used in many BOM's.
Matter very critical.
regards,
Mohit Goyal

Thanks Srikanth for promp reply.
But i am not looking for PIR data. I need standard issues of the component as per the BOM.
For example a component is used in 5 BOM's. Now corresponding to actual issue of the component , planned/standard issue is required for the component. This way we can further calculate the variance.
Hopefully the requirement is clear.
regards,
Mohit Goyal

ECC plan output seems to be wrong

I have following setup for one of the plan:
MDS
Item 1 day1 15
Item 1 day2 30
Item 1 day4 30
Item 1 day4 50
Item 1 day4 100
Supplier constraint for item1
day2 - day3 10 units
day4 - day6 1 unit
the plan is a ECC plan .Plan has given following out put :
demand supply
Item1 day1 15 pegged to 5 on day2 and
10 on day3
Item1 day2 30 pegged to 1 on day2 and
5 on day3 and
24 on day 7 (this is ok since some days are
holiday in between)
Item1 day3 180 pegged to 180 on day 7
question is as follows :
i) for the item1 demand on day1, why it has not pegged to supply of 10 on day2 and 5 in day3 supply ?? Why this is reverse case here ??
ii) For Item1 demand on day2 , why the extra supply capacity of supplier i.e 5 more units has been used and why the supply from day4 to day6 of quantity 1 unit/day has not been used ??

Abhishek,
Review your pegging controls in the plan option and related profiles. For a capacity constrained ASCP plan, you should be using priority based pegging. Adjust the supply and demand windows to the range of time that you want the system to sort and rank your supplies and demands. Also check your demand priority rule in the plan options. Assuming you are using date based priority for the demands, you will see these demands ranked accordingly. You can see the demand priority calculated by ASCP in each peg's 'properties'. The supplies within that window have an implicit ranking based on supply type (firm, then real supplies that are non-firm, then new planned orders).
For your supplier capacity question, check your profiles related to how supplier capacity is accumulated.
Regards,
Kevin

Resource overload in ECC plan

Hello Gurus,
I am on a ASCP ECC plan - OPM. I have a resource, which when i go to resources and select the Horizontal plan for that particular resource i see that the available hours is less and the required hours is more. So that mean the resource is overloaded. when i click on the required hours i see what are all the items that are to be loaded in that particular resource. I see that the start date and the end date is the same that is the plan run date (i.e lets take it as 29-07-2012 00:00:00). But when i see the supplies for the particular lines i see that the certain quantities of that particular line is pegged to a different sales order which does not fall on the same day (some like 02-08-2012, 15-08-2012, etc etc). Does it mean that to satisfy that demand on 02-08-2012, 15-08-2012, it has to be manufactured today that is the plan run date like 29-07-2012. Is my understanding correct or am i wrong
Thanx & Regards

Hi,
In ECC Plans, resources are overloaded if there are firm supplies or firm operation start or end dates. Can you verify if there are too many firm supplies ?

Capacity planning issue

Dear all
My customer has two actor types: project managers PM and 7 work center managers WCM, with strong antithesis: PM looks at project quality and productivity; WCM looks at his resources capacity planning.
Every PM defines wbs basic start / finish dates with appropriate, large and comfortable time lag. Into this time lag, during the capacity planning, the WCMs can set definitive activity start / finish dates, by their needs (and with user status communicates to PM the happened choice) .
The generic project is composed of more wbs elements and 7 networks: all activities of a generic network are assigned to only one work center. Every lowest wbs element has only one activity.
Every PM plans dates (large and comfortable) and efforts on network activities; schedules via bottom up and copies wbs scheduled dates on basic dates. After, CP sets the top down scenario and save the project. In IMG, network profile, the type of checking during top-down time scheduling is u201CEu201D: exit with error (transaction code OPUU).
Every WCM using transaction code CM01 doesnu2019t see the WBS constrains. So doesnu2019t know the wbs dates range. Moreover the WCMs donu2019t like a dashboard like CM01 because it is not user friendly. They prefer a graphical dashboard.
My personal idea to resolve this issue is use transaction code CM21 or similar with the display of wbs time lag. Is it possible?
Is there anyone who could help me, please? I am also interested in other technical solution.
Thanks in advance.
Salvo50

Venky,
1) Sales order when enter in the system can perform the capacity availability check ?
Not in ECC/R/3. However, in APO this is possible.
2) The delivery dates & confirmation in the sales order is on what basis?
Depends on how you have configured your availability check. There are a number of possibilities. Many companies confirm MTS orders to Total Replenishment Lead time in the Material master. Other companies leave the orders unconfirmed until Planning has created supply elements (production orders).
As far as the delivery date is concerned, it can also start with the confirmed material availability date as calculated by ATP, and then additionally schedule in the warehouse pick-pack-load times, and route transit time (the time it takes to move the shipment from your loading dock to the customer's location.
In 'Assemble to order' (a special version of Make To Order) it is possible to confirm to the scheduling time of the supporting Finished goods production orders combined with the availability of the components of the FG production order.
In R/3, some companies will confirm the MTS sales order to a date that is farther into the future than the actual estimated process time including capacity backlog. Then, they run MRP to create planned orders. Then, they run Capacity leveling. Then, they run BackOrderProcessing (rescheduling) of the sales orders to re-confirm to the planned or production orders that have been capacity leveled. In this way, Sales orders are indirectly confirmed to capacity.
Consult with your local SD and PP ATP experts to discover the options available.
Rgds,
DB49
Edited by: Dogboy49 on Jan 6, 2010 10:37 PM

Workspace - planning issue.

HI,
I have issue with logging into workspace and opening a planning application.
I am able to login into workspace without an issue .
Before that . I have configured using IIS ( instead of apache ) on port number 80 and with weblogic 45000.
Now, i am able to open it on both 80 and 45000, and I see the following error in both the cases.
The errors are :
1. Invalid or could not find module configuration.
2. Required application module HyperionPlanning.planning is not configured. Please contact your administrator.
3. Communication Error
I have seen the errors in other posts of the forum. but In my case it does not work both on 80 and 45000.
pls help.

Hi,
If you can't access planning through http://<planning machine>/HyperionPlanning/ then IIS set up must not of been successful.
By default it uses a isapi redirect filter to redirect from IIS to the correct port of say planning.
It is picked up from \Hyperion\common\appServers\Tomcat\5.0.28\isapi\isapi_redirect-1.2.14.dll
If you go into IIS management and select properties for your web server, under the ISAPI filters tab you should see the status of the filter.
It is configured using the property files :- uriworkermap.properties and workers.properties
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Crystal Reports - ECC - SSO Issue

Team,
System Details.
1. BOE XI 3.1 SP3
2. Crystal Reports 2008
3. SAP ECC 6.0
4. SAP NW 7.x
Scenario: Crystal reports running against ECC system. SSO configured on Crystal Report database configuration option, report is accessed through SAP NW portal (which in turn is configured to BO Info View using KM IVIEW option). Report fails with "The database login information is either incomplete or incorrect" error message.
BUT the same user id (as the user id ) when hard coded ("Use same database logon as when report is run") in Crystal Reports database configuration static option ("Use original database logon information from the report") works fine.
Please let me know your thoughts regarding how to debug this issue?

Hi,
if you want to have SSO for the report you need to :
- have the SAP Authentication configured and the SAP Roles imported
- the SAP Roles need to have the necessary rights on the BOE Server
and in your case because of the portal part :
- all machines need to be in the same domain
- all URLS need to be fully qualified
- trust between ECC and Portal needs to be configured
- your ECC system needs to accept portal token
ingo

Issue with Java Application with ECC - Connection Issue

Hi
We have developed one java application to connect to SAP to extract some data. We are using java API (sapjco) to connect to the SAP. Now we are facing one issue u2013 for the ECC while connecting through the java application we are getting u201CUserid or Password incorrect erroru201D, but with the same userid and password we are able to log through the SAP GUI. If we changed the password with all CAPS (Capital Letters) and without numeric values, its working fine in java application (Means its connecting to ECC)
We are facing this issue only in ECC; the same application is running successfully in SAP 4.7 etc. without changing password.
Please Help!

I would draw the conclusion that you have to provide the paaword in upper case. There is a standar java method there that does this for you. Just do it before sending the password.
Regards,
Benny

Subquery execution plan issue

Hi All,
Oracle v11.2.0.2
I have a SELECT query which executes in less than a second and selects few records.
Now, if I put this SELECT query in IN clause of a DELETE command, that takes ages (even when DELETE is done using its primary key).
See below query and execution plan.
Here is the SELECT query
SQL> SELECT   ITEM_ID
2                         FROM   APP_OWNER.TABLE1
3                        WHERE   COLUMN1 = 'SomeValue1234'
4                                OR (COLUMN1 LIKE 'SomeValue1234%'
5                                    AND REGEXP_LIKE (
6                                          COLUMN1,
7                                          '^SomeValue1234[A-Z]{3}[0-9]{5}$'
8 ));
   ITEM_ID
74206192
1 row selected.
Elapsed: 00:00:40.87
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3153606419
| Id | Operation          | Name        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |             |     2 |    38 |     7   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 | CONCATENATION     |             |       |       |            |          |
|* 2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN | PK_TABLE1   |     1 |    19 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 |   INDEX UNIQUE SCAN| PK_TABLE1   |     1 |    19 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("COLUMN1" LIKE 'SomeValue1234%')
       filter("COLUMN1" LIKE 'SomeValue1234%' AND REGEXP_LIKE
              ("COLUMN1",'^SomeValue1234[A-Z]{3}[0-9]{5}$'))
   3 - access("COLUMN1"='SomeValue1234')
       filter(LNNVL("COLUMN1" LIKE 'SomeValue1234%') OR LNNVL(
              REGEXP_LIKE ("COLUMN1",'^SomeValue1234[A-Z]{3}[0-9]{5}$')))
Statistics
          0 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
          8 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
        348 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        360 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
          1 rows processedNow see the DELETE command. ITEM_ID is the primary key for TABLE2
SQL> delete from TABLE2 where ITEM_ID in (
2 SELECT   ITEM_ID
3                         FROM   APP_OWNER.TABLE1
4                        WHERE   COLUMN1 = 'SomeValue1234'
5                                OR (COLUMN1 LIKE 'SomeValue1234%'
6                                    AND REGEXP_LIKE (
7                                          COLUMN1,
8                                          '^SomeValue1234[A-Z]{3}[0-9]{5}$'
9 ))
10 );
1 row deleted.
Elapsed: 00:02:12.98
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 173781921
| Id | Operation               | Name                        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | DELETE STATEMENT        |                             |     4 |   228 | 63490   (2)| 00:12:42 |
|   1 | DELETE                 | TABLE2                      |       |       |            |          |
|   2 |   NESTED LOOPS          |                             |     4 |   228 | 63490   (2)| 00:12:42 |
|   3 |    SORT UNIQUE          |                             |     1 |    19 | 63487   (2)| 00:12:42 |
|* 4 |     INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| I_TABLE1_3                  |     1 |    19 | 63487   (2)| 00:12:42 |
|* 5 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN     | PK_TABLE2                   |     7 |   266 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   4 - filter("COLUMN1"='SomeValue1234' OR "COLUMN1" LIKE 'SomeValue1234%' AND
              REGEXP_LIKE ("COLUMN1",'^SomeValue1234[A-Z]{3}[0-9]{5}$'))
   5 - access("ITEM_ID"="ITEM_ID")
Statistics
          1 recursive calls
          5 db block gets
     227145 consistent gets
     167023 physical reads
        752 redo size
        765 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
       1255 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          3 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
          1 rows processedWhat can be the issue here?
I tried NO_UNNEST hint, which made difference, but still the DELETE was taking around a minute (instead of 2 minutes), but that is way more than that sub-second response.
Thanks in advance

rahulras wrote:
SQL> delete from TABLE2 where ITEM_ID in (
2 SELECT   ITEM_ID
3                         FROM   APP_OWNER.TABLE1
4                        WHERE   COLUMN1 = 'SomeValue1234'
5                                OR (COLUMN1 LIKE 'SomeValue1234%'
6                                    AND REGEXP_LIKE (
7                                          COLUMN1,
8                                          '^SomeValue1234[A-Z]{3}[0-9]{5}$'
9 ))
10 );
The optimizer will transform this delete statement into something like:
delete from table2 where rowid in (
    select t2.rowid
    from
        table2 t2,
        table1 t1
    where
            t1.itemid = t2.itemid
    and     (t1.column1 = etc.... )
)With the standalone subquery against t1 the optimizer has been a little clever with the concatenation operation, but it looks as if there is something about this transformed join that makes it impossible for the concatenation mechanism to be used. I'd also have to guess that something about the way the transformation has happened has made Oracle "lose" the PK index. As I said in another thread a few minutes ago, I don't usually look at 10053 trace files to solve optimizer problems - but this is the second one today where I'd start looking at the trace if it were my problem.
You could try rewriting the query in this explicit join and select rowid form - that way you could always force the optimizer into the right path through table1. It's probably also possible to hint the original to make the expected path appear, but since the thing you hint and the thing that Oracle optimises are so different it might turn out to be a little difficult. I'd suggest raising an SR with Oracle.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis

ECC Connection Issue

Hi..
I am doing MM-SUS interface. I raised the Purchase Order Request in morning, connection is not there from ECC to XI. Connection is available at evening time only. I want to get the Total purchase order requests from morning to evening at evening time only. How can I proceed for this. Please suggest me.
Thanks in advance,
Pasi.

Hi,
     I think you have Files at source and IDoc's at target in ECC.
     There is an option in XI to plan your File Adapter, i.e. Availability Time Planning to remain active for particular period of time in a day.
     This configuration is done through Runtime Workbench in XI. If you plan it properly to remain active for some time in Evening. It will pick up all the files in evening and will send it at one go.
Goto RWB--> Communication channel monitoring on the top rightmost corner you will find an option called "Availability Time Planning" Select that option it will pop anothe window where you can find the option to setup your channel available for particular time.
Surf it out.
Regards,
Anurag Garg

Contract , billing plan issue

Hello
I am having issue where I have cancelled billing document corresponding to a contract, then also I canu2019t rebill the contract. I found in the header billing plan the status is showing is B(Partially processed) which is partially processed and for a line item it is showing C(Completely processed), though I have cancelled all the invoices. Can some one help.
David

David
Try running reports SDVBUK00 and RVV05IVB to correct the status and/or billing index after carefully reading their documentation.
Hope this helps.

Costcenter planning issue

hi guys,
I am facing with a problem like when i am trying to use the t.code: KP06 To use the cost center planning it is asking for a planner profile. i had tried to use the default profiles but it is giving an error like Entry does not exist in TKA50 (check entry).
Please tell me how to solve the issue.

Dear,
Use Path
SPRO > Controlling > Cost Center Accounting > Planning > Manual Planning > Define User-Defined Planner Profiles.
Select the profile you want and click on General Controlling.
Select Cost ctrs: Cost element/activity inputs then click on Layout for Controlling and enter layout created by you or enter any existing one.
Once you have done all settings here go to KP06 and use SETTINGS > SET PLANNER PROFILE and enter the profile you maintained settings for.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

Milestone Invoicing Plan Issue

Hi All,
We have successfully configured Milestone Invoicing Plan Scenario, but are facing one issue. We were successfully able to transfer PS invoicing plan to PO. After milestone is confirmed when we go to check PO in DISPLAY mode, block is still there. If we just switch to CHANGE mode in PO without doing anything else, the block disappears. Hence the functionality appears to be working but we have to switch to change mode and save PO once.Please let us know if anyone faced this issue earlier and what was the resolution.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Ankesh,
It's the standard behavior in SAP. Contacted OSS.. no help. finally with the Help of WF and PO maintain BAPI we made that to Work

SQL Server Maintenance Plan Issue

SQL Server Version:
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.5000.00 (Intel X86)
Dec 10 2010 10:56:29
Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 2)
Issue : Maintenance Plan - DB backup plan & TRN Log backup plan skipped / some times not deleting the old backup files.
Error : Failed to retrieve date for this request (Microsoft.SqlServer.SmoEnum)
Additional Informaiton
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch.
(Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
A Server error occurred on the current command.
The results, if any should be discarded (Microsoft Sql Server)
Any experts can help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks
drmrpush
MRVSFLY

Hello,
Same issue reported here:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/601fd83c-c49f-4bf8-b69d-95431197652d/maintenance-plan-is-not-opening-on-sql-server-2005-sp2?forum=sqlkjmanageability
Please check solution on :
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/3e53ba8b-ea23-4629-98db-43c80ba9888e/cannot-save-maintenance-plans?forum=sqltools
This problem occurs if some of the stored procedures while installing SP2 has not been applied successfully. So manually run the script below and it may resolve
your issue. It resolved ours and we went throught exact same process of re-installing several times.
                1)
First go to the folder Install . The default location is this = “C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\Install “ .
Please post back still your issue not resolves.
2)
Then in this folder find this “sysdbupg.sql” .
3)
Please open this script with a nodepad.
4)
Then copy the
whole script and then paste it in the Query window of the Management studio.
5)
Then execute this script.
6)
Once this script has been successfully executed, The issue should be resolved.
Regards, Pradyothana DP. Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue. Please Mark This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue. ========================================================== http://www.dbainhouse.blogspot.in/

ECC plan issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for