ECCS timestamp of documents

I'm looking at ECCS from a BW point of view.
What I need to do is find a way of indicating the new entries in the ECCS summary table ECMCT.
Do you know of a table which would have the key etc.
Similar to the concept in FI where there is a document number and creation timestamp.
Any ideas?

Hi Paul,
I am currently working on the EC-CS module. As you have done the EC-CS extraction into BW , i have a question..... Wht is the datsource to extract the details/ Item of the EC-CS module.
ECMCT is a totals table and ECMCA is Actuals table.
3EC_CS_1A gets the data from ECMCT, but do you the datasource which extracts from ECMCA table.
Our client wants to see the data in detail rather than the totals level.
Please advice.
Thanks,
Bala

Similar Messages

ECC integration with Document Management System

Hi,
Can anybody provide step by step approach for connecting ECC with Document management system(product of EMC).
Also would appreciate if somebody clarifies the folllowing queries
1) Do we really need Archivelink if we just want to store documents and access documents from DMS.
2) What are the configurations required at DMS side and what are the configurations required at SAP ECC.
Any solution to my problem will be much appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
Prabhat

If you Google 'Flash SCORM' you should find a good deal of
info.
Dave -
Head Developer
http://www.blurredistinction.com
Adobe Community Expert
http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/

Timestamping change documents

Hi all,
We are using Business Partner/Customer synchronisation but have noticed that the entries in CDHDR are timestamped one hour apart. So a synchronous change made at say 15:00 is stored on the table as 15:00 for object class DEBI but as 14:00 for object class BUPA_BUP. This is not really a problem as, when the BUPA_BUP data is displayed via the standard transactions, it displays as 15:00. Our only problem is a Z-coded change document report which shows the times directly from the table.
I assume that there is configuration based on the object class but I can't find it. Does anyone know where it is??
Thanks in advance.
Brian

Hi Maria,
You should try transaction SUIM and select 'Change Documents'. Then you can also run report RHCDOC_DISPLAY as per note 1158326. The prerequisite is to activate the creation of change documents for the specific infotype, I mean you have to maintain the table T77CDOC_CUST. Hope it helps,
Kind Regards
Christine

Integrate ECC with SRM Document Builder

Hello SRM Guru,
We have requirement in our client to Integrate ECC with Only SRM PPS Document Builder Component.
Here is more detail:
After creating PO in ECC , User should click some button in the PO Transaction that should launch the document
builder Webdynpro where they can enter some more questioners then the PDF format or Word format contract will be generated then it should be attached in the PO in ECC.
Client wanted to use only SRM document builder component. Could you please let me know the possible
option to integrate ECC and Document Builder.
Like how to open document builder webdynpro application form ECC and how to transfer PO details to Document Builder
and finally how to attach the generated contract to PO in ECC.
Thanks in Advance.
VJ

The upload type should be same, for ECC and SRM .. only the datasource need to be changed
Example:
If I you want to integrate Contracts from ECC and SRM, The OPM_SOURCES table should be like BELOW
ECC:
SOURCE ID :    SRXCLNT220##ZBBP_TD_CONTR_2
SOURCE NAME : CONTRACTSSRM_DS
UPLOAD TYPE : CONTRACTS
SOURCE TYPE    DS
SRM
SOURCE ID :     EXSCLNT220##Z_SADSECC6CONTRACT
SOURCE NAME :   CONTRACT_DS
UPLOAD TYPE :   CONTRACTS
SOURCE TYPE :   DS
Rgds,
Raj

MM ECC 6.0 document

I want to know the recent new features in MM modules for ECC 6.0
Appreciate any links or inputs

hi,
check the SDN thread: New Logistics Transactions and functionalities in ECC 6.0
Pls check...i have provided direct link...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Timestamp in Documents

A customer wants to measure the performance of the users by examining the time it takes to move from one stage to another (e.g. Sales Quotation to Sales Order.)
But SBO only tracks the date. If we want to the time, what's the best way?
What I can think of is to use a UDF and a trigger. But we are not encouraged to use triggers. Any advice?

I would suggest to use UDF for the time and catch the item event for add/update the document you want to measure.
In the beforeaction == true case you can store the time in your UDF.
Hope it helps.

A Security Weakness When Signing without a Timestamp

Hi Guys,
I am exploring the need of timestamping PDF documents using Adobe Acrobat wrt security. I see a lot of signatures made without timestamps and I see an issue here mentioned below. If my assumption is valid then Ideally Adobe Acrobat should strongly mandate to use timestamps with revocation information.
The scenario:
A user uses a high trust credential to legitimately sign PDF documents but chooses not to use a Timestamp to avoid costs. These documents have an embedded signature plus the signer’s certificate chain CRLs and/or OCSP responses (but no trusted timestamp).
At a point in time (let’s say 1 June 2012) the credential and PIN is stolen. If the theft is before the end of validity period the credential is of course revoked. However if the theft is of an expired credential it can’t be revoked and most people would not notice and perhaps would not even care. Let us further assume the thief gains access to a number of old signed documents. Of course in theory this is not a problem, because these documents are signed and therefore protected and can’t be changed. However the thief now has access to a range of valid CRLs and/or OCSP responses that were properly valid from before the theft and can use them to their advantage. These documents may even be widely published or perhaps received anyway by an insider thief.
The thief can use the stolen credential and can sign a document at any date/time of their choosing up to 1 June 2012 (by varying their local system date/time) to one that lies within the validity period of any previous OCSP/ CRL data they have captured. Even though the signature covers the validation data this is all done at what seems like a legitimate time.
Trust Threat Analysis:
A stolen credential and PIN can easily be used at a local desktop time (set to anything you like). With PDF editing software – no problem for a hacker of course – you can embed a CRL that shows the stolen credential as good during any period up to the revocation or expiry. The hacker just needs to select a signing date/time that is within a CRL validity period for one of the CRLs they have access to. The selected CRL is then re-used as part of the signing process on a fraudulent document.
It is now up to the receiving software to make the right trust decision – and a trusted timestamp should always be used to make a trustworthy historic decision. If there is no embedded trusted timestamp the receiver software could decide to verify the signature at (a) the current time or (b) the (untrusted) time indicated by the signer. Any software that uses option (b) and trusts the (untrusted) time in the signature rather than defaulting to current time creates a substantial trust issue. The whole purpose of using and attaching a valid, trusted signature time stamp is to independently confirm the accurate date/time of (potentially untrusted) third party signing events. The timestamp cannot be re-used since it covers the signature details. Any substantial variance in time between the signer’s time and the timestamp time is peculiar but systems should always default to trusting the signature timestamp date/time.
Ideally PDF signing software used by a signer that fails to obtain a timestamp should not allow the document to be signed. If the policy is to sign with a long-term signature then the timestamp must be present to confirm the time. Some software products create confusion by allowing the timestamp to be missed if it cannot be obtained. This means that a document that should have a life of several months or years should actually be seen to have an issue immediately after certificate revocation or expiry (could be in a few days or months). Using such software, users will not be aware of the issue until the problem has manifested itself.
Any Comments?
Regards,
Wahaj

The settings for the warning messages have been removed from the user interface (Bug 513166).
You need to change the related security.warn_* prefs directly on the about:config page. 
Filter: security.warn
To open the about:config page, type about:config in the location (address) bar and press the "Enter" key, just like you type the url of a website to open a website. 
If you see a warning then you can confirm that you want to access that page. 
*Use the Filter bar at to top of the about:config page to locate a preference more easily.
*Preferences that have been modified show as bold(user set).
*Preferences can be reset to the default or changed via the right-click context menu.

How to change the Timestamp In a program

Hi,
We faced a problem today, Some of the critical jobs from a source system are going to short Dump. Unfortunately we couldn't find any lockwaits, deadlocks and any delay in SM37. After analyzing, we came to know that, SAP trace indicates failure occured during program /GLB/RGTCSR_RC_INV execution :
B *** ERROR => DISTRIBUTED_TA_FAILED:
The timestamp for the execution of the program has been set as "20.070.801.000.000", that does mean it will try to retrieve all values after the date 01.08.2007 and the time 00:00:00. Now checking on the code we can see there is a logic written which retrieves the values from the table /GLB/RGTT_CS_RC, checking on the Goods Movement status (wbsta) , timestamp and document number (VBELN_SO) if any. For this case VBELN_SO is blank and vbsta is equal to space (Not Relevant). This retrieval helped to logic to retrieve 706706 document and items from the table. This amount of data is huge and we would like to request BW team to run the program with a smaller timestamp to avoid any inconsistencies and also to avoid the dumps which can occur when we try to play with this huge entries.
Checking on the code, two similar selects have been written on the same table /GLB/RGTT_CS_RC, firstly to select all the document numbers relevant to the timestamp and wbsta value and secondly to check "Get records that may have already been used", depending on the document number and item numbers. But as we are doing a select * it will automatically select VBELN_SO as well as POSNR_SO. Hence, the second select from the same table is irrelevant and it will only effect the performance of the system, in the worst case it will terminate the program with this huge amount of entries. Hence, this logic has to be combined to one single select for which the first select statement is enough. Playing with a huge amount of data 706706, and retrieving from the same table twice can surely result in a short dump. Also there are couple of loops has been done on the same table which reduces the performance too.
Possible solution looks like we need to reduce the time stamp and run it,
can some one tell me how to change the time stamp in a program???

First check the connection with the source system. If its ok then replicate the datasource and activate. Then try with running job.
Time stamp error usually happens when source system in BI and r/3 side differs.

Link between Service Order / Confirmation in CRM and Purchase Order in ECC

Hi all,
Does anyone knows what the possible link is between a Service Order / Service Order Confirmation in CRM and a Purchase Order in ECC ? I heard that this could be found somewhere in the document flow of a Service Order ....
How do we get the Purchase Order number from ECC in the Document flow section of an Service Order in CRM ?
We need the PO number somehow to be able to create a Goods Received document in ECC from CRM.
BR,
Abjuh

Hello Abjuh,
As of CRM 4.0 (with Service Industry extensions), you can automatically create ECC Purchase Orders from a CRM service order.
It is possible to track the status of the individual service order items with the document flow.
Please refer to the SAP Help for more information.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/EN/46/8bae7e9e886160e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
Kind regards,
Kristoff.

General Ledger view -Document

Hi All
We have implemented ECC 6.0 document splitting activated.In ECC 6.0 we can see General Ledger view for how the document has split according Business Area for this necessary configurartion has been done.But while uploading the requierd Tranasport has not moved while seeing the document we have find out that the request has not moved.Subsequently it has moved the document which has created after this showing General ledger view.without this view we cant see the Business area wise Balance sheet.Initial upload document have this problem.I would like to know how to retrive this general ledger view for initial document.Is any other program is there to retirve the view.
Regards
Venkat

Dear customer,
For old you document you need to migrate data.
Please refer the SAP Note no 812919.
Reg
Madhu M

PDF signature timestamp problem

Hi, sorry if this post is slightly offtopic.
We are trying to sign and timestamp pdf documents in java (using Apache PDFBox) and we are stuck with a problem for more than a week. The signature itself is good, Adobe Reader can validate it succesfully (after adding our self signed test root certificate to trusted certificates). The problem is with the timestamp. Adobe Reader says that the signature is timestamped, but the timestamp could not be verified. If I look at the Date/Time tab on the Signature Properties window the Timestamp Authority field says Not available. Older versions of Adobe Reader 9 displayed the Show Certificate button for the Timestamp Authority as enabled, and if I clicked it, the Reader crashed. In newer Reader 9 versions and in Reader X the button is disabled. It seems Reader recognises the timestamp but can't extract the TSA certificate.
However if I sign the pdf with Acrobat X Pro or with iText (using the same private key and the same TSA) everything is perfect, the timestamp is validated, Timestamp Authority field shows the correct value, TSA certifiicate is OK.
I analyzed the signatures and the timestamp tokens, but I could not find any significant difference between the good and wrong ones.
I wanted to attach a working and a non-working sample but I didn't find how to do that.
Could someone please give us some advice about what could cause something like this?
Can Reader log the signature parsing/validating process to view what's wrong?
Thanks in advance
Csaba

Hi,
I had the same problem with the pdf signature timestamp…..
The thing I was doing wrong was the SHA-1 hash sent to the timestamp server, more precisely I was sending the whole signature SHA-1 hash when I suppose to send the SHA-1 hash of the RSA encrypted hash of the digital signature (I think that in your case is the 256 hash starting from 1783).
Hope this helps you,
Corina

Not display billing document in R3, only display Sales Document

Hello,
We need to make a change on CRM. On CRM environment we have the document flow in the sales document. If we replicate the document to R3, in R3 we can see the sales document replicated and the document flow, for example, the billing document. We need to stop to some users to display the billing document in R3(only display the sales document replicated from CRM).
Is there anyway to apply this possibility on CRM, because the replication to R3 is only with one user RFCUSER, could be possible to create another user like RFCUSER2 for example, with less authorizations in R3.
We have been answered on this forum to to this:
This you can achieve by creating one more RFC destination.
Logon & Secruity Details for this RFC Destination should be
Trusted System : Yes
Logon : Select the Current User
After saving this check for the Remote Logon, it should navigate to your ECC system with your current user.
Next go to BD97
Assign this new RFC destination as "Standard BAPI Destination".
After this, when ever you navigate to ECC from CRM document flow, it will logon to ECC system with Current User.
But where we can custimize all this requirements??
Any other help?
Hope you can help us,
Thanks in advance

Hi Felix,
    You will perform this customization setting using two transaction codes BD97.
    Create RFC destination using SM59 transaction in CRM system.
    Assign this new RFC destination as "Standard BAPI Destination" in BD97 transaction. code Here assign this standard BADI destination to the ECCLogSystem. In BD97 you should see the logical destinations assigned to your CRM system. If you wont see ECC Logical System in CRM, then maintain ECC logical system using ALE Configuration. This entry should exist in the table TBDLS of CRM System.
     I hope this answers your question.
//Bhanu

Sharing attachment documents (e.g. for P.O.) in extended classic scenario

Dear SAP SRM gurus
in the SAP SRM extended classic scenarios (rel. 7.0) attachments of Purchase Order can be viewed also in the backend SAP ECC 6.0 as per SAP Notes n. 1582690 and 1057932 . But I am not sure if attachments are phiysically transmitted from SAP SRM to ECC or only document url is passed even though, as per SAP note n.1357551 it seems that only url is passed.
My customer wants to know if there is the possibility of not replicating them.
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Many thanks in advance
Best regards
Gianluigi Brenna
Edited by: GIANLUIGI BRENNA on Jul 29, 2011 2:56 PM
Edited by: GIANLUIGI BRENNA on Jul 29, 2011 3:08 PM

Hello,
In extended classic scenario the attachments arent transferred to ECC as the source document is in SRM. The document in ECC is only a copy and it cant be modified also.
If we have to transfer attachments, then probably implicit enhancements to standard logic might be needed.
Regards,
Prasanna

PI setting for transferring Contract from SRM to ECC - Classic scenario

Dear Experts
SRM 702
ECC 6.0 EHP6
SRM - Classic scenario
Need to understand PI setting for transferring Contract from SRM to ECC, as currently document Central Contract document getting created in SRM, but it is not getting transfer to ECC
No XML message getting triggered in ECC systm as well
can you help me in this
if any additional information needed, pls revert
Regards
Prashant K

Fully approve and release the contract. It will trigger the XML Message.
Go to https://websmp203.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=00200682500000002672&_EVENT=DISPLAY&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000122&_HIER_… and download the configuration guide & check the PI setting and required Software Components in PI.

How to add ECC Sales Orders to Interaction History?

I have configured the Interaction History Profiles through IMG --> CRM --> IC WebClient --> Master Data --> Define Interaction History Profiles. In the profile, I added transaction type TA along with other custom transaction types. The new profile was assigned to the functional profile on the business role. However, I am unable to see any sales order history in the interaction history (but am able to see the other custom transaction types).
I made similar configuration changes to the account fact sheet. Here I followed instructions from this blog: http://sites.google.com/site/rupeshpatil/tweets/addsalesordertoaccountfactsheet . I used transaction type TA for the search display. The account fact sheet is able to retrieve the ECC sales orders without any problems.
I am also having the same issue with agent inbox search for sales orders, but this is not as critical.
The ERP Sales Order Profiles have also been set up to use the ECC client with document types OR and TA, and have been assigned to the functional profile on the business role. IMG --> CRM --> IC WebClient --> Business Transaction --> ERP Sales Order --> Define Profiles for Sales Order

Hi Jerry
Check class CL_CRM_IC_IHISTSEARCH_IMPL (the view controller's class), method SET_ALLOWED_BT_OBJECT_TYPES, you'll see these values hard-coded.
Allowed Business object types:
    gc_object_type-businessactivity TO me->gt_object_type,   " BUS2000126
    gc_object_type-service          TO me->gt_object_type,   " BUS2000116
    gc_object_type-lead             TO me->gt_object_type,   " BUS2000108
    gc_object_type-sales            TO me->gt_object_type,   " BUS2000115
    gc_object_type-complaint        TO me->gt_object_type,   " BUS2000120
    gc_object_type-task             TO me->gt_object_type,   " BUS2000125
New from CRM 7.0
    gc_object_type-opportunity      TO me->gt_object_type,   " BUS2000111
    gc_object_type-incident         TO me->gt_object_type,   " BUS2000223
    gc_object_type-problem          TO me->gt_object_type,   " BUS2000224
    gc_object_type-contract_sales   TO me->gt_object_type,   " BUS2000121
    gc_object_type-contract_service TO me->gt_object_type.   " BUS2000112
Rupesh

ECCS timestamp of documents

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for