ECM Change no Mandatory for CS02

Dear all,
To make the ECM change no mandatory for CS01 and CS02 i have followed the below settings.
1.In OS27 - Check box included for BOM validity maintained,EC Management active,History Requirement.
2.In OS25 - BOM usage 1 & BOM status 1 - History Requirement check box is included.
3.Authorization object C_STUE_NOH is with No.
After making these changes and saving and assigning the same to that user id,logout and login.
It is working properly for CS01 but for CS02 even waring message it is not giving, directly it is allowing to chage the BOM without change no.
Can any one suggest what may be the issue or any other settings i am missing?
Thanks in advance,
Ganesh

Dear all,
I noticed one issue if the BOM is alraedy created without the change number, when i try to change that BOM it is not throwing error message as Change no. mandatory.
For that same BOM if i assign with one change no and make the necessary change and saved.
After this change it is not allowing me to change the BOM without change no.
My question is all materials BOM are already created in the system, so the user try to change the BOM in CS02 as first time without the change no it allows.
How can we restrict the user to change the BOM with change no only?
I hope my question is clear.
Thanks in advance,
Ganesh

Similar Messages

  • ECM change no mandatory only for specified Plants in CA01 and CA02

    Dear All,
    I am in the process of activating the engineering change management for BOM and Routing.
    I did the necessary setting to work ECM.
    Now my problem is we have different plants and the ECM has to be activated only for 2 plants.
    To make change number mandatory in CA01 and CA02 for these 2 plants. i followed the below steps.
    IN T CODE OP5A- PP TASK LIST INITIAL SCREEN - CHANGE NUMBER - CHOOSE RADIO BUTTON INPUT - SELECT INFLUENCING -SELECT PLANT -CHANGE NUMBER - ENTER PLANT - CHOOSE RADIO BUTTON REQUIRED
    Same like that I did for both plants. Even after this setting it is not allowing without change number.
    Can any one help me to solve this issue.?
    Thanks in advance
    Ganesh

    Thanks for your reply.
    After giving authorizations also  problem pertains the same.
    Can any one tell steps followed in field selection parameters is right or wrong?
    Regards,
    Ganesh

  • Change number mandatory for display routing

    Hello friends,
    Through OP5A I hade made the change number field mandatory for routing.
    System ask for change number while changing or creating the routing.
    But my question is system should not ask for change number during display routing. ( If a item had gone through many changes during a period. By default system should take latest only)
    Is there any way? or some development is required
    Thanks in advance
    Maruti

    Hi,
    This requirement is genuine but liitle tricky..
    Follow th procedure as below:
    in OP5A:
    1. Double click on PP Task Lists. Do not select the Change Number mandatory there.
    2. Click on Influencing Button
    3. Double click on Transaction Code:
       Here, select the "Change No." as required and in the Contents filed, put CA01 and Pres Enter.
    Afterwards put CA02 and Press enter.
    4. Now Press on Influences Button.
    Here you can see that the Transaction Code - Change number is mandatory for CA01 and CA02.
    But not for CA03
    Remeber to press enter after inputing the Transaction codes, otherwise those will not apper in influences..
    Try this revert for further discussion.
    Regards,
    Siva

  • Change number mandatory only for CS02

    Hi Expert,
             I want to mandatory the change number only for CS02. I have refereed scn discussion but i am unable to make mandatory  the change number.
    Refereed comments:
    how to make the Change number field in CS02 transaction
    A basic SAP Engineering Change Management Setup
    ECM Change no Mandatory for CS02 | SCN
    Kindly suggest how to make mandatory the same.
    Regards,
    Santosh Sharma

    Hello Santosh
    The change number requirements on CS02 is controlled by the authorization object C_STUE_ROH.
    Note 420878 provides more information about this scenario.
    Check the relevant information provided on the note below:
    Symptom
    In Customizing of the BOM, the history requirement is set or a BOM requires a history. Despite this, it is possible to process BOMS without engineering change management. The system only processes a warning message (29 045) which can be skipped.
    Additional key words
    CS02, change number, OS27, W045(29)
    Cause and prerequisites
    Authorization profile
    Solution
    Check the authorization profile of the respective user.
    Example:
             C_STUE_NOH <OBJ>
                &_SAP_ALL    <AUT>
                    NOHIS      <FLD>
    would have the authorization to process BOMs requiring history without a change number. In this case, if you change '*' to ' ' in NOHIS, you will no longer receive a warning, but rather an error message.
    BR
    Caetano

  • Make the ECM Number mandatory for Routings

    Dear All,
    in SAP Standard it is possbile to make the ECM (Change No.) mandatory for BOMs using the authorization Object "C_STUE_NOH".
    Without entering the change number the system will give an error message, maintenance/creation is not possible with CS01 and CS02.
    The question is, if something similar is existing for Routings?
    Thanks for the usefull hint/help in advance.
    Csaba Mathe

    Dear All,
    the topic is still open, the transaction OP5A is not working fully as required.
    The business need is: make the change number  mandatory for CA01 and CA02 transactions, but only for the given Plants. not for all Plant. E.g for Plant A and B it should be mandatory, however for the Plant C should not be mandatory.
    Based on our setting, to manage such as situation, we see, the system is not working as we expect.
    We set the first level condition ofr change numbers the transactions CA01 and CA02. It is working well. In both tranactions the change number is mandatory.
    Then we extend the condition by two Plant, we want to have the change number mandatory in CA01 /CA02, however this is not working.
    May be there is an error in the standard program?
    Regards,
    Csaba Mathe

  • ECM Remove change no mandatory in CA01

    Dear Experts,
    i have Followed procedure as below:
    in OP5A: to make the change no mandatory for CA01 and CA02
    1. Double click on PP Task Lists. Do not select the Change Number mandatory there.
    2. Click on Influencing Button
    3. Double click on Transaction Code:
    Here, select the "Change No." as required and in the Contents filed, put CA01 and Pres Enter.
    Afterwards put CA02 and Press enter.
    4. Now Press on Influences Button.
    Here you can see that the Transaction Code - Change number is mandatory for CA01 and CA02.
    It was working fine.
    But my question is because of some reasons i would like to revoke the above settings, i revoked all the settings and deleted the influences.
    Still for CA01 change no is mandatory, for CA02 is not.
    Can any one tell what is the issue?
    Thanks in advance,
    Ganesh

    Dear,
    Please check once again it should not show the X mark in front of CA01 it should be ready for input
    Also note The influences of certain fields do not have effects on the modifiable fields although these fields are defined as being influencing.
    Example: You defined the field "change number" depending on plant as a required entry. Nevertheless, the field "change number" does not appear as a required entry on the initial screen for routing maintenance.
    transaction SFAC, 
    - enter program and screen group, change, Module Pool SAPLCPDI  Screen groupP000
    - select modifiable field (double-click, modifiable field),
    - select influencing field, new values,
    - maintain influences
    Also go to CA01 and check any transaction or screen variant has been created for CA01 in SHD0 then delete it.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Change number mandatory Routing for a particular Plant

    Dear All,
    i have requirement to make change no field mandatory for only one plant. this field should not be mandatory for other plant. I tried with OP5A tcode, using plant as influencing field, change no as modified field and content as plant no. so its working but,
    it doesnt work for the 1st time execution. from 2nd time only its working. like this user will be able to make the changes without change number in every login 1st time.
    So i set the plant as user parameter in user profile and made it working. but its not full proof soluton. can any one suggest some solution??
    please suggest.
    Thanks & Regards
    Vinay
    Edited by: vinay  upadhyay on Sep 7, 2009 9:46 AM

    Hello Santosh
    The change number requirements on CS02 is controlled by the authorization object C_STUE_ROH.
    Note 420878 provides more information about this scenario.
    Check the relevant information provided on the note below:
    Symptom
    In Customizing of the BOM, the history requirement is set or a BOM requires a history. Despite this, it is possible to process BOMS without engineering change management. The system only processes a warning message (29 045) which can be skipped.
    Additional key words
    CS02, change number, OS27, W045(29)
    Cause and prerequisites
    Authorization profile
    Solution
    Check the authorization profile of the respective user.
    Example:
             C_STUE_NOH <OBJ>
                &_SAP_ALL    <AUT>
                    NOHIS      <FLD>
    would have the authorization to process BOMs requiring history without a change number. In this case, if you change '*' to ' ' in NOHIS, you will no longer receive a warning, but rather an error message.
    BR
    Caetano

  • ECM changes for Phanthom assembly

    Hi Gurus,
    I want to change the BOM - Item qty which is in Phanthom assembly, in CO02 - Production order.
    Please guide me to do this, the same should be updated in my Production order also.
    Regards
    Chandru

    Dear Chandrasekaran,
    ECM - can be used for the creation & modifications for a BOM.
    OCM is used for Change management in Production orders.
    But to work with ECM & OCM,the necessary configuration settings has to be done first.
    Check this,
    Engineering change management (ECM) allows you to change various master data in a coordinated manner when they have to be
    changed together within a change process. Future procurement elements can thus be created directly with a changed product
    structure.
    Order change management (change management for production orders), in short OCM, expands this function. It is possible to
    include existing procurement elements (production orders, planned orders, purchase orders) that are also affected by a change, in the
    change process. The change process begins when a sales order or master data is changed. You can also adapt production orders on
    which work has already been done to the changed product structure.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • How to maintain open change request control for the transaction MM02 & CS02

    hi all...
    can any one please let me know that, is there any BADI or Enhancement spot
    where i can code for my desired functionality...
    how to maintain open change request control for the transaction MM02 and CS02.
    Desired Functionality:
    • The user wants to maintain a material, bill of material or a document.
    • On the initial screen of the respective transaction (MM02, CS02)
      user enters a change request number.
    • The system checks whether the object record that the user wants to maintain
      is already assigned to other change request numbers.
    • If this is the case, the system displays a warning, stating that there are
      other open change requests for this master data record.
    • In addition, the system lists the relevant change request numbers.
    • The user can continue the maintenance or leave the transaction and first check
      the mentioned change requests.

    hi satish thanks for reverting back
    but sorry yaar given enhancement is not triggering...
    but my requirement is:
    - after executing the transaction MM02 & CS02.
    - user inputs the data for Material Number and then he enters the Change Number.
    - if the given Change Number is not maintained with the Material (i dont no
      where/how this two fields are maintained internally), then it has to raise a
      warning and it should list the existing Change Numbers for that perticular
      Material.

  • Tax code field under INVOICE Tab to be Mandatory for Inter Company PO

    Dear All,
    In MIRO  Tax code field under INVOICE Tab to be Mandatory for Inter Company PO u2013 ZNB & ZRT for company code 0001.
    How do we set as mandatory fields for those two intercompany document types.
    Regards,
    Teja

    Hi
    If u want to maintain tax code as mandatory field in PO?
    Then SPRO- SAP IMG- MM- Purchasing - Purchase order- Define document types
    In this check the filed selection key for the document types.
    Then select the SPRO- SAP IMG- MM- Purchasing - Purchase order- Define svreen lay out at document level.
    In this for the field selection key select GR/IR control and click on tax as required. and then save
    It will not allow to create PO with out maintaoning tax code.
    If u want to do tax code as mandatory in MIRO
    Then Go to OLMRLIST and make changes accordingly.
    Thanks
    Raman

  • Freight Charges Mandatory for Particular Vendor?

    Dear Experts,
    i want freight Charges Mandatory for Particular vendor while creating PO in pricing conditions?

    Hi
    firstly check on whta keys you have maintained the condition records
    if itis with various keys like vendor plant material etc , then check is it satisfying all???
    now for your purpose just create access sequesnce with VENDOR (plant can be included ),
    now delete all old records created for the fright condition
    now assign this vendor in the Fright condition , also you can mark this condition as cant process manually if you dont want user to make any change to thsi condition )
    create new record only specifying vendor as key point
    now create Po and check
    Edited by: Kunal Ingale on Jan 31, 2012 11:10 AM

  • How to created exit for CS02 transaction to maintain bom details of a mater

    hi ,
         plz explain how to created exit for CS02 transaction to maintain BOM details of a material. what is the BOM component . give me sample example.

    Hi,
    these are the user-exits for CS02
    Transaction Code - CS02                     Change Material BOM
    Exit Name           Description
    PCSD0001            Applications development R/3 BOMS
    PCSD0002            BOMs: Customer fields in item
    PCSD0003            BOMs: Customer fields in header
    PCSD0004            BOM comparison
    PCSD0005            BOMs: component check for material items
    PCSD0006            Mass changes user exit
    PCSD0007            Check changes in STKO
    PCSD0008            WBS BOM: Customer-specific explosion for creating
    PCSD0009            Order/WBS BOM, determine URL page
    PCSD0010            Order/WBS BOM, determine explosion date
    PCSD0011            Knowledge-based order BOM, parallel update
    PCSD0012            Customer - Mat. number/mat. number during material exchange
    PCSD0013            Customer-specific processing of an explosion for BOM browser
    Regards
    Nilesh

  • ECC Sales Order - City Mandatory for Partners

    Hi All,
    I am facing one issue in the Sales Order.
    In Customer Master, the City is not mandatory. We are able to save the Sales Order for customers without City and we are able to proceed the entire cycle.
    some cases, we are changing the address manually for some partners in Sales Order, at that time the system is expecting the City is mandatory in the Sales Order.
    How can I make the system not to be mandatory for Partner Addresses in Sales Order?
    Regards
    Saravanan

    Hi Arun,
    we are not using one time customer. We have two account groups "sold to party" and "Others". In Both the account group, the City is not mandatory. We are able to save the customers without City in both the account group.
    We are able to create Sales Order for these customers and can proceed delivery and billing.
    In some cases, the address of the customer in the sales order have to be changed, like the ship to address etc. When we change this address, in the Sales Order the City became mandatory (i.e it is mandatory at the time of Change in VA02, but not in VA01, that is looking strange)
    We want to avoid this situation. Because some customer dont have city.
    If there is no option, then the city have to be mandatory in the customer master itself.
    I checked the screen painter for this program and currently city is not required field. however the system asks it at the time of change (VA02) not in VA01.
    Thanks for looking into this issue.
    Regards
    Sarva

  • Budget mandatory for earmarked fund

    the funds managment module is made mandatory and activated. while accounting the expenses the system checks the buget avaialality and does not allow unitl the budget is available for a committment item.
    i want to make the budget availablity mandatory even while raising the earmarked fund against the budget. i am able to raise earmarked fund even without any budget upload.
    i want to know how to make budget mandatory for earmarked fund pleae.
    regards
    sathya

    Hi,
    That's up to your update profile. Check whether earmarked funds are created as statistical updates; you can do it via OFUR transaction. Then, change it to be non-statistical for relevant value type (81, 65 or 82 - depending what earmarked funds - commitments or reservation - you are using).
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Year of cash effectivity mandatory for budget category 9F

    Hi,
    While creating a PO/Goods Issue I am getting the below error.
    Year of cash effectivity mandatory for budget category 9F
    I have activated the payment budget and commitment budget. Time horizon for payment budget is 5yrs and commitment budget is nil.
    i have not checked the "Start next year" checkbox.
    Please advice.
    Regards
    Shekhar

    Hi,
    You have two similar questions, so i try to help on this one.
    You can only use the Year of Cash Effectivity in BCS budgeting, if you use an appropriate FM update profile for updating posting data to FM. 
    If you use an FM update profile, which does not support the year of cash effectivity (=>field RGNJHR is always SPACE or 0000 in table FMIT) then you MUST set the time horizon to Space or 0 for all budget categories you want to use (ledgers 9F and 9G), in BCS customizing "Define Budget Categories".                                                                               
    The posting data for ledgers 9A and 9B which you have created with Former Budgeting remain valid, even with BCS active (the activation of BCS does not change the way how postings are updated to FM!.                                                                               
    However, if you have used an FM update profile without Year of Cash Effectivity before, together with Former Budgeting, and if you have now changed to another FM update profile WITH Year of Cash Effectivity, then you must migrate all existing posting (or FM update) data in your system, for all fiscal years since the activation of BCS, by filling the field RGNJHR or GNJHR in the corresponding FM tables (FMIT, FMIFIIT and FMIOI) with some valid value (i.e. greater or equal to the fiscal ).                                                                               
    I hope this help you.
    Regards, JLB

Maybe you are looking for