ECM - no status update of IT0759 to "approved"

Dear all
We are using the new iView "Planning Overview" in MSS for the higher-level Managers to review the planning of their subordinate organizational units. When an organizational unit is completed and the higher-level Manager reviews this organizational unit and rejects the planning, the status in Infotype 0759 (data field: CSTAT) of the corresponding person which are assigned to this organizational unit is updated to to "rejected". However if I approve the organizational unit the status in Infotype 0759 is not updated to "approved".
Does somebody know about this problem?
Kind regards,
Isabelle

Hi,
This is what SAP says for report RHECM_CHANGE_PROC_STATUS (Change Compensation Process Status):
If the Multilevel Approval Process has been enabled for the selected compensation review(s), then this report can be executed to change the status of Compensation Process infotype (0759) records directly from Submitted to Active, without the intermediate status of Approved that is required in an employee-based approval process. Therefore, if you employ the Multilevel Approval Process for a particular compensation review, then it is imperative that you check the approval status of that review before you use this report to change the status of the associated infotype records.
To this end, when the Multilevel Approval Process is active for the compensation review at hand, always execute the Display Compensation Planning Progress report and review its output before you execute this report.
For the Multilevel Approval Process, the permissibility of status changes for compensation reviews is configured in Customizing for Enterprise Compensation Management (PA-EC), under Compensation Administration ® User Interface Settings ® Define Attributes for Planning Overview.
Source: help.sap.com
Donnie

Similar Messages

ECM EHP4 - status of IT759 not updated when manager approves

Hi, we are implementating ECM on EHP4 and are having issues in the planning overview iview. when a planning manager approves an org unit, the status of IT759 for the employees it not being updated from submitted to approved. I have checked the user interface config and we have the tick box checked for allow approval process.
Also, once the org unit is in approved status, we cannot reapprove. I have tried using PECM_ADJUST_0759 - Adjust Compensation Process Records , to reopen the approved org unit and reinitialise but this does not work.
does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks Tanya

Hi Tanya,
Use PECM_CHANGE_STATUS to reset the 0759 records from Approved or Submitted back to In Process. Or the other way around. Very useful transaction.
As to your first question, from your description you are having the planning manager Approve the proposed pay changes. Normalthe planning manager will Submit and then a higher level manager will Approve or Reject. We used a separate area for the Planning vs. the Approval/Reject step. Only proposals in Submitted status are available for Approval/Rejection.
We are removing that process this year as we had the same problem of always resetting. So we just allow the adjustments to remain In Process throughout the review period. Then use PECM_CHANGE_STATUS to move to Submitted, Approved and Activated.
Paul

Unable to change the status of a project to approved

Dear Members,
I am using the Oracle Vision Instance version 12.1.3 and Database 11.2.0.3.0
I have created a project. I am unable to change the status of the project to APPROVED. I am getting the below error:-
Please enter an active project manager for this project in order to change or update this information._
Can any one please help me in resolving this issue.
Many thanks in advance.
Regards.

R4S wrote:
Dear Members,
I am using the Oracle Vision Instance version 12.1.3 and Database 11.2.0.3.0
I have created a project. I am unable to change the status of the project to APPROVED. I am getting the below error:-
Please enter an active project manager for this project in order to change or update this information._
Can any one please help me in resolving this issue.
Many thanks in advance.
Regards.Please see these docs.
CMRO Partially Implemented Visit Errors with "Please enter an active project manager for this project in order to change or update this information" [ID 864812.1]
Update_Project Erroring With PA_PR_INSUF_PROJ_MGR While Creating Task For Templates [ID 1085068.1
Thanks,
Hussein

Report on "Status updates history"

Hi,
i need to check if resource are updating task from "My Task". Is it possible to estract a report on "Status updates history"?
I mean this type of data:
Approval Date
Action
Status
Info
Task Name
Project
Type
Start
Finish
Actual Work
Remaining Work
% Complete
Assigned To
Approved By
Thanks
Daniele

Hi Daniel,
You will probably have to create a join with the MSP_ASSIGNMENT_TRANSACTIONS Table.
See reference here:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/project_programmability/archive/2008/01/03/statusing-transactions-partial-documentation.aspx
Hope this helps.
Guillaume Rouyre - MBA, MCP, MCTS

REPORT AND STATUS UPDATES - EXCHANGE

Hello
I have installed the Rollup 5 for Exchange 2010. So far so good. The issue is that
in "" Updates Needed "" point, tells me that the machine needs the Rollup 4 and 2 ...
Why can it be?? (I think It should not appear in the report ; NO need more updates )
(The report date is OK )
Regards and thnak you
MCITP

Hi,
As I referred in my last post, if you have another Exchange Server that needed rollup 2 or 4, you may see such a status report. So the point is that if it is the only Exchange
Server.
And another reason I could think is the server lose connection with WSUS server since it installed rollup 5. Check the computer report, notice the date of last report.
The status
needed means:
You have approved the update for installation but the client computers have not contacted the WSUS server since you approved it.
The update has already been downloaded and installed, but the client computer has not contacted the WSUS server since the update was installed.
The update has already been downloaded and installed, but the client computer must be restarted before changes go into effect. The client computer has not been restarted.
The update has been downloaded to the computer but has not been installed.
The update has not been downloaded or installed on the computer.
Hope this helps.

Status updates history period default

Hi
Is there any way to change the default status updates history date range from 3 months please? Currently as the status approver for a major change program I'm getting several hundred tasks to approve every day across multiple project plans; the problem
is that when I go in to clear down to run my weekly reports it lists every task submission for the last 3 months. The thing is, IE can take several minutes before it displays the page in full as it chews through all of the data which is annoying
to say the least.
I'd quite like it to show only the last 3 weeks, not the last 3 months.
Does anyone have any suggestions please?
Thanks.

Hi,
As far as I tested, changing the default 3 months range from the date range feature will unfortunaltely not be kept in your IE cache next time you'll navigate to the status update history page. Thus you'll have to set it again every time you access
the page.
I guess this 3 months default value might be changed programmabily but I can't help on this.
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MCP, MCTS |

ECM Set status authorisations

Dear All,
I am implementing ECM for BOM, but having problem during authorizations to set status to users. As we have implemented there scenarios for ECM.
1.     Creator
2.     Reviewer
3.     Approver
Now I want to set authorization as given below to different users.
USER 1: Create ECR with CC01
      Set Status: Checked ECR (in Header)
USER 2: Change ECR with CC02
     Set Status: Change Possible (in Object tab)
     Set Status: ECR Checked (in Header)
                     Approve ECR (in Header)
                     Covert ECR (in Header)
Now user can change BOM with ECR. After completion of change now user can Complete ECR.
        Ser Status: Complete Change (in Object tab)
                     Release change (in Object tab)
USER 3:
     Set Status: Close ECO (in Header)
                      Release ECO (in Header)
Please guide us, possible ways to give authorizations to define users.
Regards,
Swapnil Vaidya
Moderator message: not directly related to ABAP development, please have a look in the Netweaver Security forum.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Mar 17, 2011 10:16 AM

hi Swapnil,
Can you plz help me on getting this information
I wanted know in which table status, date and person-responsible this data will store for particular ECR number. for references please see below screen-shot
For ex:- Check ECR   12.02.2012     USER1
             ECR Checked 12.02.2012   USER2
similar for all status in which table the data is stored

How to set Changed_by field with User ID not by Workflow ID, when Status Update from Workflow

Hi Frds,
I am updating the Order Status from Workflow. So the Status update (or Order Changed) is save with Workflow ID. I need to insert UserID instead of workflow ID. Please help me out of this.
Thanks
Imran

Hi Imran
With the very few details available on your process, the workflow design and the "Order", all I can suggest is that:
1) In your workflow definition, go to the step which sends the user decision, in the binding FROM the TASK TO the Workflow, set _ACTUAL_AGENT to a workflow container element , say DECISION_AGENT (of type SWHACTOR)
2) Assuming that the next step in APPROVAL branch is setting of the status, go the task ID of that Step -> make it a dialog step (remove the Background Processing check) -> set it's agent assignment to general task
3) Back in the workflow, set that STATUS SETTING step to Advance With Dialog under the details tab
4) In the control tab of the same step, in the agents section, set agent as EXPRESSION and the value as &DECISION_AGENT&
When a user approves the decision item, his ID will be stored in DECISION_AGENT
The status set will execute immediately (because of "Advance with Dialog") in the same session of approving as the user who approved is the same running this step now
The status will be set by the ID of the Approver
The above is hypothetical considering
1) You do not have dynamic parallel processing
2) Status setting happens immediately after the approval; as a first step in the approval branch
3) The Decision Task does not has "Confirm End of Processing" checked.
Regards,
Modak

Status update for MeeGo on the N900

Here's a copy of the text sent by Harri Hakulinen from Nokia. He is the project lead for MeeGo on the N900. This message was sent to the MeeGo developer mailing list just now:
Hello MeeGos !
This is brief status update of "MeeGo to N900" project. This project is currently running as Nokia project, and I am Nokia project lead for it. The current closed mode of development is not the target for us at all, but rather transitional condition. As already discussed by Valtteri in TSG meeting, we are looking into going more open mode shortly. One reason why we have done this on this way is that at the same time we have been trying to handle opening of many currenly closed components that are needed in MeeGo and to build feasible MeeGo images for N900.
However, a lot of related work is already done completely open, you can find more info from places like ofono.org, connman.net and meego.gitorious.org . So if you are eager to contribute or want to closely follow whats happening, please work on those.
As you know, we have delivered working MeeGo images for N900 as part of first code drop in the end of March. At that state we were using older kernel version on N900 than on Atom side, as we used the same kernel (.28) than what is used in Maemo 5 based products today. We ended up doing that simply because lack of time to contribute and port all the drivers to the newer kernels.
Now, for the upcoming May release of MeeGo, we are going to use the same kernel version (.33) than Atom based devices are using. For that we need to submit number of ARM-architecture patches to MeeGo as well, because many of the required ones have just been contibuted upstream kernel and were not available in .33 version originally.
We have already enabled most of the main drivers, like LCD, GFX, Wlan and BT. Still, there is a lot to do in order to enable .33 on N900, like audio drivers, and modem subsystem including SSI buss driver, modem data and audio drivers etc. Our adaptation guys are in fact contributing those modem subsystem related drivers as we speak, and if you are following kernel mailing lists you can see how that goes on.
Besides of enabling the new kernel, we are working with number of smaller and bigger issues for N900. Starting from the beginning, we are now based on ARMv7 combiled code, so the code should be better optimised for N900 now. ARMv5 compilation that was in use for code drop will still be there, and it also seems to be used at least by community project that is planning to release MeeGo for good old N810 tablets
Also, we are planning to enable dual booting of Maemo 5 and MeeGo for the upcoming release. So that will be offered as 3rd way to setup MeeGo to N900, including the existing "native" MeeGo only on N900 and chroot based MeeGo on Maemo 5 setups. Taking the dual boot mode into use likely includes upgrade to Maemo5 kernel as well, but that should not be big issue in the process of enabling that.
As I don't want to go ahead of others working on MeeGo architecture and other issues I will stop now, but I will report again when we have more to tell about the subject.
Br,
// Harri

Here's another update..
It seems that MeeGo on the N900 is not directly being driven by Nokia! It's an open project.. so the net result is MeeGo on the N900 may look and feel very different to Meego on the N900's sucessor
Either way, I'm certainly greatful for their efforts!
Hello Meego's,
As indicated in my previous mail about "MeeGo for N900" status, we were planning to open up our MeeGo work around N900. Now I am happy to announce, that we are there
First, to make it absolute clear for everybody: This is about open MeeGo adaptation to N900 device.
Like any other MeeGo project, it is open source project for all applicaple purposes, and does NOT directly have links to any potential Nokia product or potential product plans. So, based on this or any other of my posts, please do NOT start or continue speculation of upcoming Nokia MeeGo releases. That is practically not helpfull, and mostly only takes our time when we need to explain our words and actions in detail to various directions.
From our part, we are trying to implement the open development model that has been discussed now so many times around MeeGo. On practical terms, we are trying to work based on proposal by Carsten Munk, see
http://wiki.meego.com/Proposal_for_Best_Practices_for_working_in_a_MeeGo_team
We have already created some resources that will be used by the team, you can learn about those and the upcoming ones from http://wiki.meego.com/ARM/N900. We have IRC channel for realtime discussion, we will use meego-dev mailing list for normal discussions and announcements, and we will have Gitorius project for code.
We will evolve our practicies during the work, so if you are interested, stay tuned to those channels. I belive that soon we are also able to figure out, what is best way for community members to help us in development, and then effectively be part of the team.
I would also like to use this as opportunity to introduce the team behind this work (so far) and also thank them about their hard work and long hours. We have team that consist of some Nokia subcontractors and also growing team of Nokia personel:
"MeeGo for N900" team (so far)
- Cybercom Turku team; Marko Saukko, Jouni Peltonen, Sami Sirkiä, Jari Smura and Luka Milovanov.
- Cybercom Tampere team; Kalle Lampila,Teemu Tuominen,Tuukka Mäkinen and Ville Marjusaari.
- Carsten Munk via Nomovok
- Jarkko Nikula via Atomide
- Jan-Simon Möller from Linuxfoundation
- Nokia team; Alexander Kanevskiy, Felipe Contreras, Markus Lehtonen, Ameya Palande, Sakari Poussa, Roger Quadros and me.
In addition to official project team, many Nokia people have helped us despite their hectic daily work, even with their free time. Most of them are driven by the desire to open, repurpose and upstream all relevant sw that has been originally created for Maemo 5 based N900 product during previous years.
Marko, Jouni, Sami & Luka and Markus were working with me already on last year when we did prototypes and interoperability tests of Maemo & Moblin stuff combined in different ways. Based on those we had pretty good picture of what we are doing and why.
And of course, we have had very good and productive co-operation with various Intel teams since those times. Anas Nashif and many others from Intel's MeeGo team have done a lot for us by enabling ARM stuff in MeeGo OBS and repositories.
Last but not least, I want to give special thanks to Stskeeps (alias Carsten Munk . He has teached us how to operate on open, and he has also done respectable amount of this work since early days of Meego. In addition to that, I belive that his earlier work on Maemo community and on Mer project has in fact inspired all of us and shown a way to MeeGo alredy years ago.
Br,
//Harri

Unable to run bapis for project status update and date update together

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to update the dates and status of a project WBS at level 4. I am trying to do update the CJ02 Transaction using standard BAPI available. I need to do both Date update and status update in the same LOOP PASS   i am using the below mention bapi. when i am doing so i am getting an error Project 'A._____' has been currently processed by ID i.e. my id.
I have tried putting a wait for 2 seconds in the code but its still not working. please find the order below in which i am calling the bapi.
Loop at itab.
if date_changed = 'X'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PROJECT_MAINTAIN'
      READ TABLE it_error WITH KEY message_type = c_e.
      IF sy-subrc <> 0.
Commit
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
             EXPORTING
                  wait   = c_x
             IMPORTING
                  return = s_ret.
   endif.
endif.
if Status_change = 'X'.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PS_INITIALIZATION' .
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUS2054_SET_STATUS'
      READ TABLE t_result WITH KEY message_type = c_e.
      IF sy-subrc NE 0.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PS_PRECOMMIT'
             TABLES
                  et_return = t_ret.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
             EXPORTING
                  wait   = c_x
             IMPORTING
                  return = s_ret.
     ENDIF.
endif.
    WAIT UP TO 4 SECONDS.
endloop.

Try to use
SET UPDATE TASK LOCAL.
before each BAPI call.
Did you try to debug through your code, leaving sufficient time between BAPI calls? If it does work like that, then the above statement might help.

Delivery status update in sales document at PGI

Normally system updates the delivery status of sales document line level, when a delivery document is created with respect to that sales document line.
But I want system to update the delivery status (in sales doc. line) when PGI is done for respective delivery document; not at the creation of delivery document. Below I have shown the status updating scenarios that I expect.
Scenario 1
Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
Delivery Doc qty: 50 PCs
PGI: Not done
Status in Sales document line should be A (Open)
Scenario 2
Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
Delivery Doc qty: 50 PCs
PGI: 50 PCs
Status in Sales document line should be B (Partially delivered)
Scenario 3
Sales doc line qty: 100 PCs
Delivery Doc qty: 100 PCs
PGI: 100 PCs
Status in Sales document line should be C (Fully delivered)
Can anyone propose a possible way of doing this (configuration/ user exits/ BADI etc,)?
Thanks,
Ramindu

Hi,
I dont know it with the use of ABAP development, but by functional logic, can suggest you to configure the rush order sales configuration for your particular sales order.
just check that availability of that particualar sales order is met or not prior to it.
and then automatically when your delivery doc is created, PGI would be done and the status of your sales order would be updated with it.
try it out on your development client, if it works out.
regards,
Siddharth.

HT4314 hello i have an ipod touch 4 5.1.1 and i can't post status updates or have a profil picture what is the problem and my sister has it and we have the same itunes account in game center

hello i have an ipod touch 4 5.1.1 and i can't post status updates or have a profil picture what is the problem and my sister has it and we have the same itunes account in game center

And the answer is:
williamfromlongueuil wrote:
we have the same itunes account in game center
You need to have your own account... DUH....

Status Update of Service Order From Billing Document

Dear Experts,
I am told to change the User status of Service Order once the Billing Document is Generated.
Here we are in CRM 2007 and i have done the status update of previous document but here
Billing document is not possible to read through CRM_ORDER_READ (function module).
Do any one have any idea how do i proceed.
Thanks,
SA

hi sa
to change the service order user status , when biling document is generated
make an implementation of bill_acc_if bai and in the method ENRICH_ACC_DOCUMENT
read order data using crm_order_read and change the status using
CRM_STATUS_CHANGE_EXTERN
thnks
sam

Can´t access my files on Creative Cloud. "Page temporarily unavailable. We will return soon." "We are working quickly to resolve the problem and apologize for the delay. Check back later or visit our website for status updates. In addition, you can get he

Hello,
For a few days I have been trying to access my files on Creative Cloud web without success. I´ve got this message only:
"Page temporarily unavailable. We will return soon."
"We are working quickly to resolve the problem and apologize for the delay.
Check back later or visit our website for status updates.
In addition, you can get help in the forums of the Creative Cloud.
Thank you for understanding!"
(I used Google Translate)
Somebody help?

You do not need ?&promoid=KRUVP at the end of the url but it should not matter.
One thing to check is if your hosts file is modified. Open the Command Prompt and type: notepad %systemroot%\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
This will open a read-only copy of your host file in Notepad. Are there any entries in this file regarding adobe.com?
The other thing you can do is open the Developer Tools in the Chrome browser. On Windows press Ctrl + Shift to open them. Switch to the Network tab. Reload the page by pressing Ctrl + r. Check for any 4xx or 5xx errors which should be colored red.
Post screenshots of your results or send me a private forum message with the information.

BBM status update is extra sensitive....

I have been facing problem with BBM status update and display name screens.
They are extar sensitive and change immediately before you actually decide to press enter.
Any solutions?

Good day
Welcome to BB forums
I never seen or heard of something like that happening!
may I ask what OS your running now?
Want to contract me? You can follow me on Twitter @RobGambino
Be sure to click Like! for those who have helped you.
Click Accept as Solution for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

ECM - no status update of IT0759 to "approved"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for