ECS- Extended Classic Scenario - Customer expectation

Hello All
What are the customer expectations from Extended classic scenario other than SAP Standard functionality
Muthu

For example
1.business wants to send a PO via EDI . it may be achieved by enhancement
2. PO message not be created in SRM and message creates in ECC and sent it to supplier from ECC not SRM
3.data synchronisation on transaction data across SRM and ECC
4. local contract with Vendor list.
etc.
Muthu

Similar Messages

  • Extended Classic Scenario - SHC: Buffer table not up to date

    Hello all,
    I'm working in SRM_SERVER 550, SAPKIBKT11, and having issues using BACKEND PURCHASING ORGANISATIONS and the Extended Classic Scenario.
    According to SAP note 944918 the following indicator should not be required to be set:
    Supplier Relationship Management>SRM Server>Cross-Application Basic Settings>Activate Extended Classic Scenario --> extended classic scenario active.
    I did set the Backend Purch. Grps Responsible indicator, and I did create organizational units specifically for the backend purch. grps.
    We need to set the main part of all SHCs to ECS, but when I do set the indicator in customizing to "extended classic scenario = active", I get a dump in my web environment: 'buffer table not up to date'.
    What is causing this failure in my SHC?
    I tried to implement BAdI "BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI" (method DETERMINE_EXTPO) like described below here: without the line bbp_extpo_gl-bbpexpo = 'X'., I can continue and create the SHCs. Problem is though: all SHCs will get marked as Classic Scenario. So, to make sure the SHCs will always get marked as ECS, I have added this line in the BAdI. Unfortunately this immediately results in the 'buffer table not up to date' error in the SHC itself, as soon as I try to open the details of the new item.
    Hope you help me out here?? It doesn't seem to be related to the BAdI, but somehow the system doesn't allow me to mark SHC items as ECS.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Berend Oosterhoff
    SRM Consultant Accenture Technology Solutions - The Netherlands.
    BAdI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI:
    method IF_EX_BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI~DETERMINE_EXTPO.
    data definition----------------------------------------------------*
      DATA:    wa_mattype     TYPE BAPIMATDOA,
               wa_char18      TYPE MATNR,
               attrib_tab     TYPE TABLE OF bbp_attributes,
               wa_attrib_tab  TYPE bbp_attributes,
               wa_value       TYPE om_attrval,
               wa_product_id  TYPE comt_product_id.
        bbp_extpo_gl-bbpexpo = 'X'.
    from here I did the specific selection for the SC, but that's not relevant here.

    Hi Prashant,
    Thanks for your quick reply!
    Note 1085700 is about Short Dumps when creating or changing a contract. I am trying to create a Shopping Cart, without a reference to a contract. BAdI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI is not active in our system.
    Any other thoughts?
    Regards,
    Berend

  • Extended classic scenario triggered on company code

    Good morning,
    I have a system with SRM 5.0. I would like to have both classic and extended classic scenario, I know that it is possible to activate extended classic only for a product category with BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI , but my question is: Is it possible to activate it for a company code? If yes, is it with the same BADI ?
    Thanks in advance
    Charlotte

    Hi
    <u>Before talking about de-activating ECS or not in this BADI, this scenario must first be activated.</u>
    This is done via the customizing point "Activate ECS": just flag the check-box, and all you classic items (i.e. those for which a backend has been determined) become extended classic.
    Here is the SRM - IMG path:
    <b>SRM Server --> Cross-Application Basic Settings --> Activate Extended Classic Scenario.</b>
    You can then fine-tune the scenario by using the BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI.
    Note- The BADI BBP_EXTLOCAL_PO_BADI can be used to activate the classic scenario based on the proguct categories .
    <u>You can choose to have the 3 scenarios working on the same SRM system depending on product category (standard) or any other business rule through the BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI. The BADI is mandatory if you want the Classic and the Extended Classic to work together</u>
    <u>Exactly, this BADI allow you to implement your own business rule for backend determination in a multiple Backends environment (Standard customizing is only based on Product categories)</u>
    As soon as you use BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI , you don't have to use the ECS scenario activation customizing point (the rule is overwritten with the BADI result). The BADI BBP_DETERMINE_LOGSYS will only help in your case, if you have several Backend where to create PO documents.
    <u><b>PS: be aware that in ECS scenario you will no longer be able to create PR or reservations in R/3.</b></u>
    <u>Other related links -></u>
    Classic Scenanio and Extended Classic Scenario
    Extended Classic vs Standalone
    Re: Calssic or Extended Classic Scenario - BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI
    Classic / Extended Classic Scenario for Shopping Cart
    Re: Classic Scenanio and Extended Classic Scenario
    Re: Switching from Classic to Extended Classic
    Re: Calssic or Extended Classic Scenario - BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI
    Change from ECS to Classic Scenario
    Re: Changing the Global Control of Extended Classic Scenario
    Re: Technical Scenario Switch: From Standalone To Extended Classic
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • ASN in Extended Classic Scenario with SUS

    Hi SRMer?
    Is it possible to create an ASN in SUS with Extended Classic Scenario (ECS)?
    OSS note 543544 mention that the scenario is limited for document types Purchase Order, Purchase Order Response and Change Order. Confirmations and invoices are not possible. There is no indication on ASNs.
    Any help will be appreciated.
    Regards.

    Hi
    Please go through these links ->
    SUS-MM Confirmation without ASN
    Re: Details on ASN
    The specified item was not found.
    SUS  ASN - mandatory field
    ASN Confirmation not created,
    Clarifications on EBP-SUS and MM-SUS Scenario
    Re: SUS-MM scenario with "POR (order ack.)" and ASN for free text
    Creating custom field in ASN screen of SRM SUS
    SUS Invoice
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Limit shopping carts in extended classic scenario

    How can we implement limit shopping carts in extended classic scenario. Has anyone done it? Thanks in advance

    Hi
    Which SRM version are you using ? It's possible to implement limit items concept in ECS Scenario.
    What exactly you are looking for ?
    Please have  a look to the following links as well.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/40/654d216f12754e9decdaf4d360bc1c/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/d1/77623c44696069e10000000a11405a/frameset.htm
    <b>Few SAP OSS Notes to refer in this case.</b>
    <u>Note 712702 ECS shopping cart with several limits
    Note 724261 Limit: Error during creation of local purchase order
    Note 694442 Limit SC: Customer fields not transferred to backend PO
    Note 690000 Limit SC: Customer fields not transferred in Backend PO
    Note 699255 Internal note and vendor text for LimitPO and LimitPReq
    Note 501977 Error with limit SC: "Unit measure has no ISO code"
    Note 520514 Limit, BBP_PD148: No account assignment details were adopted
    Note 514727 Limit: Contracts are not displayed in the status
    Note 516444 Account assignment check in the shopping cart with limit
    Note 515500 Limit:'Confirmation and invoice' indicator not transferred
    Note 515695 Invoice entry for limit shopping carts not possible</u>
    Regards
    - Atul

  • POR transferred into MM(Backend) system in Extended Classic Scenario

    I am working on standard EBP-SUS Extended Classic Scenario. We have SRM Server 7.0 SP9 
    As we are successfully send PO from EBP to SUS.
    Issue : On working to Purchase Order Response,i am getting POR sent by SUS to EBP but we are not getting it replicated to MM.
    Our Concerns about is it need extra configuration required or need to have apply some note to getting replicated POR in MM from EBP or have to configure some XI Scenario to replicate POR from SRM EBP to MM.
    As we know that Extended Classic Scenario supports till Purchase Order Response still we are not getting Purchase Order Response in MM.
    Please tell us, Provided Solution will  be really appreaciated.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Pawan Keshwani

    hi,
    Pls see the foll notes:
    Note 576349 - Terms of payment in the ECS
    Note 541934 - Modification note: Copying base date from T052
    Note 953999 - ECS: Terms of Payment values not in PO header
    <b>Note 940453 - Backend payment term data not updated in the extended PO
    Note 945018 - Incoterms data not transferred to the back end</b>
    BR,
    Disha.
    Pls reward points for useful answers.

  • Freight is not updated in R/3 in the Extended Classic scenario

    Friends,
    Freight is not updated in R/3 in the Extended Classic scenario.
    Once a PO is ordered, if a freight condition in SRM is applied, it does not get updated in R/3.
    We have created a condition for Freight (Value and Percentage)in Create
    Payment Conditions using the following menu path:
    spro
    --> Supplier Relationship Management
    --> SRM Server
    --> Cross-Application Basic Settings
    --> Pricing
    --> Process Payment Conditions
    When creating a Purchase Order in SRM in the "Item Data" tab, there is
    a"Pricing" option. Choose "Pricing" and select "Add Further Conditions"
    from the drop down menu. Here Freight is available. Add Freight and
    the PO record in SRM is updated with the Freight Condition. However,
    upon ordering, the Freight condition does not transfer to the PO
    recordin R/3.
    We've heard this can be achieved by enhancement: only ie by implementing
    set of BADIs..  But does anyone know WHICH BADIs we need?  Or how we could find out?  Thanks.

    Hi
    <b> You can either of these BADIs to handlwe the scenario.</b>
    BBP_CREATE_BE_PO_NEW Exit while creating a purchase order in the backend system
    BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK   OLD Exit while creating a PO in the backend system     
    BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI  ECS: PO Transfer to Logistics Backend                  
    BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI  Control Extended Classic Scenario  
    Hope this will help.
    Please reward suitable points.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Extended Classic Scenario, BADI for PO creation in R/3

    Hi,
    We are using the extended classic scenario. When the PO gets replicated from SRM to R/3, right now the field CATALOGID is not being transmitted to the backend R/3 system.
    1) What BADI should I implement (and the method) to transmit the CATALOGID to R/3?
    2) After implementing the BADI, do I also have to change the BAPI?
    3) Is the BAPI used to transfer data from SRM to R/3, BAPI_PO_CREATE?
    Thanks and Regards,
    Peter

    Hi Peter,
    1-You can use BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI for ECS scenario.
    Since the R3 PO does not have field for catalog id, the EKKO- BEDNR (Tracking Number) field can been used for example to store this information. In this BADI all the items are identified and their tracking number field is populated with a catalogue id value.
    2-If you use the tracking number field, no use of R/3 BADI is required.
    3-BAPI_PO_CREATE1
    Please check my answers in this post :
    catalogid field not going in R3 backend
    Kind regards
    Yann
    Message was edited by: Yann Bouillut
    Message was edited by: Yann Bouillut

  • Extended Classic Scenario - Free Items?

    Does SAP support PO's in Extended Classic Scenario with a zero price (free items)? 
    My client is switching from classic to extended classic scenario and they require to be able to creaet PO's that have a zero price like they have in the classic scenario.
    We are currently getting an error that we need a price with the IR flag, but I would expect the system to automatically unflag the IR flag for a free item?

    Hi Jay,
    Thanks for your response.  There are two problems with your soluiton.  First the shopping cart doesn't have the IR flag on it and can't be changed by the user and we have PO's created directly from SC's and go out to the vendor.
    Second, In extended classic scenario it apprears that the system doesn't allow you to change the ir flag on the PO and make the cooresponding change in the ERP PO.

  • Switch from classic to Extended Classic Scenario- Impact

    Hello,
    We are proposing to switch from Classic to Extended Classic Scenario.
    We are on SRM_SERVER 550,Sp7 and SAP 4.7 backend.
    We want to know if this is technically feasible to switch and have less/no impact on existing transactional data and master data.
    Main concerns are: Existing open Shopping carts and PO's.
    We are also modifying the WF by including buyer completion WF.
    Will the carts created in classic scenario and 'awaiting approval' work similarly in ECS?
    Can we copy old carts (created in classic scenario) into new ones in ECS?
    Are there any other issues like the ones above which people have come across?
    Is there any standard SAP material/Consulting note available
    which gives some guidelines for switching scenarios?
    Regards,
    Srivatsan

    Hello,
    You can switch from the classic to the extended classic scenario by making the global settings in the IMG.
    But it would be better if you can decide if only a particular set of categories need ECS.
    If you wish to have both the scenarios,the deciding factor is the product category.
    You can also activate a  BADI for the control of ECS despite the above Global settings.
    Reward if answer is helpful,
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagarajan

  • ASN for extended classic scenario

    Hello all,
    we have SRM with extended classic scenario (EBP-MM),
    is it possible to use ASN (shipping notification) functionality in our system ?
    Kind regards,
    Arthur

    Hi
    ASN can be created by the vendor in SUS system for that XI mapping is required. ASn can be created in SUS by any vendor users. I guess it's not possible with ECS.
    Please check the SAP Consulting Note 1026638 GR Output Integration with MM-SUS Scenario for R/3 <= 47
    You need to have functional background for this:
    To create an ASN against PO or SA release:
    1. you need to compulsarily put how much qty you are sending against the reqd. qty(shown by PO / SA )
    2. dispatch vehicle no. (optional)
    3. road challan no. (optional)
    4. one more optional entry ( sorry I forgot)
    Useful related pointers ->
    Re: how does the GR get into SUS---MM-SUS Sceanario
    ASN in Extended Classic Scenario with SUS
    SUS ASN & Invoice
    The specified item was not found.
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Classic Scenanio and Extended Classic Scenario

    Hi all,
    I would implement on the same system 2 different scenario:
    1. Classic Scenario for self service procurement
    2. Extended Classic Scenario for the following business scenario:
        a. PR from ECC is transfered into Sourcing Cockpit with Plan Driven Scenario
        b. buyer convert the SC created in Sourcing Cockpit into a GOA or a PO that are transfered to ECC.
    Can coexist this different scenario?
    Can I address this different scenario only with organizational differences?
    Thanks
    Bye
    Marco

    Hi Marco,
    I see 2 quick ways to realise your requirement.
    The first is to create an attribute in t77omattr for a position and maintain that attribute in the organisational model. This attribute could just be filled with an X for example.
    Then you have to implement BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI and retrieve the attribute you created with FM BBP_READ_ATTRIBUTES (use sy-uname to retrieve the attribute for the current user).
    The 2nd is to create a Z-table with the user-ids that you want to use the local (or ECS) scenario. Then again in BADI BBP_EXTLOCALPO_BADI  you have to write the logic to retrieve and compare this.
    Keep in mind that these are user-based distinctions and not based on scenario.

  • Extended Classic Scenario-Replication of Local PO to R/3 fails

    Hi,
    In the Extended Classic Scenario (SRM4.0/ECC5.0),we are creating Purchase Order from the Sourcing Cockpit. Local PO is getting created , but is not getting replicated to Backend R/3.
    After debugging through BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC , noticed that all the PO data is available when BBP_PO_INBOUND is called .But the PO number is missing when the BAPI_PO_CREATE1 is called. Because of this , system is searching for internal number assignment and since only external number is assigned for the document type , it is giving error.
    Can anyone suggest if we are missing anything.
    Regards
    garugu

    Hello,
    this is strange, because in ECS the local PO gets an ID, and this ID is used during the transfer to R/3.
    Debug BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC once again to see where this ID is cleared.
    To you have activated the BADI BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI to transfer data to R/3 ?
    Be carefull, some BADI need to populate all export parameters/tables (E_*) otherwise the inbound data is considered as erased.
    Where is the ID disappearing ? in SRM just before calling R/3, or in R/3 ? In that case look at user-exit or BADI is R/3.
    Rgds
    Christophe

  • Payment term key with limit days in Extended Classic Scenario

    Hello,
    We have an SRM 4.0 implementation (SRM Server 5.0 with Support Package
    9) using the Extended Classic Scenario.
    When a shopping cart is created, it must be approved, and then a
    purchase order is generated (first locally at SRM, and then is
    replicated to the backend).
    The problem is that the payment term key (field at header level EKKO-
    ZTERM) of the backend purchase order is empty, only in cases when we use a payment term key which have several different values for the
    field "limit days" (T052-ZTAGG in backend, BBP_PAYTERM-ZTAGG in SRM).
    Example:
         ZTERM     ZTAGG
          K180           09
          K180           19
          K180           31
    If the payment term key selected has no several values for the field "limit
    days" (one single entry), the payment term key arrives correctly at the backend purchase order.
    Example:
         ZTERM     ZTAGG
          E000           00
    In SRM table BBP_PAYTERM we have upload the backend payment terms
    (using report BBP_UPLOAD_PAYMENT_TERMS). In other threads it is said that you must copy the entries generated by the report with the logical system of the SRM system, but in extended classic scenario it seems to be not necessary.
    We have already implemented note 846009, in order to use always the backend payment term, but the error didn’t get resolved.
    We have our vendor business partners mapped to the local and backend
    purchasing organizations, but it is only necessary indicate the Payment term key for the Backend Purchasing Organization.
    Regards

    hi,
    Pls see the foll notes:
    Note 576349 - Terms of payment in the ECS
    Note 541934 - Modification note: Copying base date from T052
    Note 953999 - ECS: Terms of Payment values not in PO header
    <b>Note 940453 - Backend payment term data not updated in the extended PO
    Note 945018 - Incoterms data not transferred to the back end</b>
    BR,
    Disha.
    Pls reward points for useful answers.

  • 'BAPI_POEC_CREATE' function doesn't work with extended classic scenario

    Hi everybody.
    Antecedents:
    We are working in an extended classic scenario.
    When we create a Purchase Order via ITS in SRM, the system works ok, the PO is replicated in the ERP system.
    But when we execute “BAPI_POEC_CREATE” function module in order to create a PO in SRM, no message are available in the application monitor, but the PO is not replicated in the ERP system.
    Both exampled were created with exactly same data (partners, items, categories, accounts, …)
    Moreover when we modify the second PO created via ITS, the systems doesn’t show any error message, we can order our PO again without error, but the PO isn’t replicate in the ERP system.
    1. We executed “BAPI_POEC_GETDETAIL” function module, and there is only a difference between POs, E_PO_STATUS table.
    PO created by transaction has 8 entries:
           I1009 X
           I1015 X
           I1021
           I1038
           I1039 X
           I1043
           I1080 X
           I1180
    And PO created by BAPI has 5 entries:
           I1015 X
           I1021
           I1038
           I1043
           I1180
    2. We run “BBP_PD” transaction, and there is only a difference.
    PO created by transaction mode shows:
    - Message: W BBP_PD 830 Default values have been taken from Vendor PRUEBA10/purchasing organization Área Global Compras (org. compras)
    And PO created by BAPI
    - Message: No Messages
    Could anyone help me with the problem?
    Thanks in advance.
    Raúl.

    Hi Raúl,
    this is exact, BAPI_POEC_CREATE is designed to create local PO.
    If you want to replicate it to R/3, then you have to change it to an ECS PO.
    In BADI BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI, called at the real beginning of BBP_PD_PO_CREATE, you will have to change some data to enable the ECS scenario:
    - change header subtype to EP
    - change header log system to SRM (keep FI LS as is)
    - determine a backend purch group & org
    - complete BE fields (be_object_id, be_object_type, don't change be_log_system because it will be determined during the transfer, be_pur_org and be_pur_group will also be determined during the transfer)
    - ... and maybe other R/3 relevant fields
    Compare both PO one by one, and adapt the gaps.
    Rgds
    Christophe
    PS: please reward points for helpfull answers

Maybe you are looking for