ED not captured at header level

Hi
I have created condition record for excise duty with JMO2,but at the time of GR,Ed is is capturing at item level but not at header level
Can anybody solve this isues

Check weather the condition record  is created in such a manner it is acceptable in header level also,

Similar Messages

  • Delivery address at Item Level and not at the Header Level

    Hello Experts,
    We are facing an issue as described below:-
    We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
    After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
    automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
    POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
    PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
    inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
    As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
    address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
    for all the Item Levels.
    However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
    PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
    address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
    is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
    Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    RKS

    It is standard process only.
    In Po delivery address is maintained at item level because to which address perticular material to be delivered,
    this may change from material to material or may not change

  • FB03 GOS (Generic Object Services) not working at header level

    Hi all,
    We have a problem with transaction FB03 when we try to display attached image documents for Fi documents.
    At Header level we have no image.
    At post level we can see the attached image.
    How can we let the display of image list active from Header level.
    Thank you in advance.
    Kind Regards
    Mohammed

    Hi,
    I have same problem but in this case only user specific.
    2 users with same authorization. First can park the invoice, attach document and can view after document save. Then he post document and able view attachment added during park.
    But other user when upload attachment during park document not able to view same attachment when document is posted. Also strange part is when this user upload new attachment during posting other users are not able to see new attachment he has attached during posting.
    I dont see any authorization difference in two except parameter values for F02, F03 and FP is different.
    Can anybody tell me how this can be resolved?
    Thanks,
    Bharati

  • Transfer Order Confirmation not updated in Header level (Table: LTAK)

    Hi,
        We are facing a problem, transfer order header is not updated with confirmation, but TO items are confirmed and resulting these transfer order to display in RF monitor (LRF1 and LRF2 transactions).
    And the other issue is, we are seeing some transfer orders created without item data (in LTAP table) and unable to confirm these TOs since Item data is not available, hence TO header is not updated with confirmation and resulting these TOs to display in LRF1 and LRF2 report.
    I have cleared some transfer orders by updating the confirmation field in LTAK table through debugging. But we see the issue is ongoing and would like to have permanent solution.
    It will be a great help if anyone have solution to these issues.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagarjun

    Hi Nagarjun,
    do you have any Z code in-between ?  Did you check OSS notes ?  Did you apply all patches to your system ?
    What you are describing is something usual when Z programs were developed, you should provide more details for analysis.
    Many thanks,
    Enrico

  • Migo is not showing the excise tab - header level and item level

    Hi,
    i have created one PO with excise and i have created MIGO with only capture excise invoice, in MIGO before saving the document system is showing the excise basic, cess and higher education cess in excise tab, header level as well as item level. After saving the document, if i go to dispaly view of the MIGO document system is not showing the header level as well as item level excise amount. The tab itself is not appearing. Can any one help me on this.

    Hi,
    There are two kinds of statuses, system status and user status.
    You can only influence System status if you execute a business transaction that changes the system status.there
    are four system statuses open, In process,Released and Completed.
    User status can be created as additional information to the system status in any numbers.But for this you
    need to define a status profile which would further be assigned to transaction type(header status) and
    item categories(item status).
    The header status is independent of the item status. One exception is the status Completed.
    If all items have the status Completed, the header status is also set to Completed.
    For defining a status profile you need to go to
    SPRO>Customer Relationship Management>Transactions>Basic settings>Status Management.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards
    Sidd

  • Delivery address appearing at Item level and not at Header level in PO

    Hello Experts,
    We are facing an issue as described below:-
    We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
    After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
    automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
    POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
    PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
    inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
    As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
    address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
    for all the Item Levels.
    However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
    PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
    address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
    is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
    Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    RKS

    HI Paul,
    Thank you for your response.In our case even if all the Line/items level have same Plant and storage location still the delivery address is getting printed at Item level and not at Header Level and this is happening only for PO's created from PR's orginating from SRM7.0.
    However if we create PR's directly in R/3 and then convert them into PO's,the delivery address is getting printed at the Header level if the delivery address is same for all the Item level.
    Can you plz some insite into this?
    Your help will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    RKS

  • Delivery address at Item level and not at Header level in PO

    Hello Experts,
    We are facing an issue as described below:-
    We are in SRM 7.0 using classic scenario.
    After approval of multi line Shopping Cart in SRM ,PR's are getting
    automatically created in backend R/3 system.After converting PR's into
    POs in backend R/3,we are observing that the delivery address for these
    PO'are getting printed at Item level and not at the Header Level
    inspite of the delivery address being same for all the Item level.
    As desired,the delivery address in the PO's should have the delivery
    address at the header level if the the delivery address is identical
    for all the Item Levels.
    However,if we create a PR directly in R/3 system and then convert these
    PR's into PO's in the backend R/3 system,we find that the deliver
    address are getting printed at the Header Level if the delivery address
    is same for all the item level(which is as desired)
    Any pointers will be highly appreciated,
    Regards,
    RKS

    This may be an old note, but it may point you in the right direction: Note 450425 - Delivery Address creates individual R/3 address number.
    If you debug the function module in SRM that creates the PO in ECC, you can check if this is the case.
    Regards,
    Robin

  • Excise is not captured for all or Second line item.

    Dear Experts,
    Excise is not updating for all the line items in while making Goods Receipt.
    while making goods receipt excise is not capturing for all the line items.
    but excise is captured at header level,its presumed that all the line items
    are capturing excise,please suggest me,what might be the reason.
    Thanks in advance.
    Varun

    Hello,
    As i think, you are creating Goods receipt With Excise option "Only Part1" in MIGO, then system will update only J_1ipart1 table with qty and without internal document number, after J1IEX only system will Update J_1IEXCDTL  table with all value and qty and internal document number.
    Suppose you have done the GR -Option' 'No excise entry" then system will not generate any Excise realted tables. Then you should  Capture Part1 entry with help of J1I5 t code, then system will update qty field , here also system will not update internal doc number.
    Write a Updation program for J_1IPART1 table for qty field
    Mahesh Naik

  • Goods recipient field at the header level when reservation is created.

    Hi Experts,
    In SRM, when shopping cart is created and a reservation is created in the backend ECC system, the Goods Recipient field is updated only at the item level but not at the header level. That is, when I go to the transaction mb23 and check the values for the particular reservation, the Recipient field is updated only for the item and not for the header.
    On the other hand when I create a reservation manually, Goods recipient can be filled at header level as well.  Is there any way in which the Goods recipient value will reflect at the header level as well when I am creating a shopping cart and a reservation is created in the backend?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Janhavi.

    Dear Poster,
    As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
    Best Regards,
    SDN SRM Moderation Team

  • Tolerance for Invoice at header level

    Hi,
    In our business process we use unplanned delivery cost for freight. It is allowed upto 5% of purchase order value. If it is more than purchasing need to review with vendor.
    In this scenario I want to set the tolerance limit in LIV when ever invoice value exceeds PO value by 5% system has to block the invoice.
    I used tolerance key PP, but it will not work at header level. It is specific to each PO line item.
    Please advice if there is any we can block the invoices when tolerance limit exceeds the PO value for total goods received.
    Best Regards

    Jaya,
    Unfortunately there are no tolerance keys designed to work in the manner that you desire. All the standard tolerance keys work at the item level.
    The only solution I can think of would be do some sort of validation on the unplanned delivery cost field via a user exit/BADI in MIRO.
    Hope this helps {or probably not:)!}
    H Narayan

  • Clearing Sales Tax at Header Level in an Order

    Hi,
    I have a requirement to not charge any tax on an order if the credit card used on the order is a government credit card. Currently I have implemented this logic in USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE. I am able to clear out the sales tax at the line level but this change does not reflect at the header level. I have to manually click on update pricing to zero out the tax displayed at the header level. I could not find a variable to tap into header level pricing condition and tax value field.
    I would greatly appreciate if any one can give me some pointers on where to look for header level data for tax. Also, is there any better user exit to implement this functionality.
    Folliwing is the code I am using to clear out line item level tax:
              LOOP AT XKOMV INTO WA_XKOMV WHERE KSCHL EQ 'UTXJ'.    "GET THE TAX CONDITION
                  CLEAR WA_XKOMV-KWERT.                               "Set the TAX to 0
                  CLEAR WA_XKOMV-KAWRT.
                  CLEAR WA_XKOMV-KBETR.
                  MODIFY TABLE XKOMV FROM WA_XKOMV
                    TRANSPORTING KWERT KAWRT KBETR.
              ENDLOOP.
              LOOP AT XVBAP INTO WA_XVBAP.    "GET THE TAX VALUE
                  CLEAR WA_XVBAP-MWSBP.                               "Set the TAX to 0
                  MODIFY TABLE XVBAP FROM WA_XVBAP
                    TRANSPORTING MWSBP.
              ENDLOOP.
    Thanks,
    Paresh

    Hi,
    In the case of sales cycle, All the item level taxes are summirised and come to the header level. So we can't find the conditions at header level for taxes. Check the user exit , because, the values are already moved to the header level structure and then you are clearing the item level taxes. I hope thats why the changes are not reflected in header level.
    Regards,

  • Invoice blocking at header level

    Dear team,
    Could you kindly provide your inputs for the following issue;
    While posting invoice with MIRO with a different ( higher) price than PO price, price blocking is happening only at the item level. But user wants to know  why it is  not blocking at header level why it was happened only for Item level.
    At what circumstances, header level will be blocked.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Madhav

    Hi Madhav,
    In your case, the system can determine that blocking is required only when the price in entered on MIRO. The system compares the price with PO price. So blocking will always be at line level, since price is entered at line level.
    Header blocking means blocking the PO completely( by checking Final Invoice check) or by blocking the Vendor in master data from posting. Both these options are not suitable for your case. The blocking can only be handled at line level.
    Hope this helps,
    Thanks.
    Uma

  • IM Output Type at Header Level

    Hi Team ,
    Please can anyone of you say me how can i configure output type at the header level of the material document ( For the Transaction Removal
    From Storage in MIGO ) ,
    Since i see all the output types are being triggered at the line item level of the Material Document and not on the Header Level, I strongly beleive
    there should be some settings where we can get the print from the Header Level.
    Printing via Collective Slip doesnt solve the problem because it will print 4 seperate pages for each and every line item.
    Thanks
    Balaji

    Hi ,
    I am testing it now in the system but please can any one of you say me which is the Output type i i need to use for a Print via the transaction Removal from Storage so that i need to get all the products in the material document along with the serial numbers ...I am trying to use WA03 to print for the collective Slip ? Does it sound right ....
    If any suggestions please let me know...
    Regarding the printing at the Header Level if i use Collective Slip option too still the output type is going to be visible only on the Line item and it doesnt make any logic ( atleast to me ) to pull all the other line items in the Material Document and print it in the collective slip.....
    Thanks
    Balaji

  • PO number prints only if it is at header level not for item level

    Hi All,
    I am not able to print the PO number in my order acknowledgement and COA printout when I enter the PO number in the sales order at item level of only. It prints fine when it is at the header level.
    Please assist.
    Thank you,
    Shanu Jain

    Hi,
    BSTKD Field in the VBKD is dependent on two things . IF the Header PO Number is same as the Item number if u change at Header level it will be changed at all items level also. If both are diff then if u change the PO Number at Header level it will change PO numbers of the Items which is having same value as Header Po Number otherwise it wont change the Item PO Number .
    Ex " Order Number 1000 is having PO Number at Header Level is PO1. And the sales order is having Item 010 and 020.
    IF Item 010 and 020 is having PO1 at item level if u change the value of PO1 at header Level if will be applicable to items 010 and 020.
    If Item 010 is having Po Number PO1 and 020 is having PO2, if i change value of PO number at header to PO3 then it will change Item 010 PO Number to PO3 and Item 020 PO Number will be same as PO2.
    Try to Take The VBKD - BSTKD where Item Number POSNR is blank that means Header PO Number .
    IF u want Item Po Number then pass the item number in POSNR and get it.
    Regards,
    Srinivas.

  • Billing document not relevant at delivery header level

    Hi,
    In one of regular scenario i got the Billing document not relevant at delivery header level in processing tab.
    can plz advice me that what's the cause for this ?
    I am using item category tan at both sales order and delivery level.
    Thanks
    Bhushan

    Hi Bhusan,
    Go to: VOV7
    Select Item Cat. as "TAN" and Double Click.
    In Tab: Business Data, Check the entry for Field: Billing Relevance.
    Entry must be "A - Delivery-related billing document"
    Another check:
    Go to: VTFL
    Select Delivery-Billing Combination.
    Go to Item (left-hand tree structure).
    Select Item cat. as "TAN".
    Here, in Field: Copying requirement, Check entry as "004 - Deliv-related item"
    Hope this may resolve the issue.
    Best Regards,
    Amit

Maybe you are looking for