EDI for cross docking process (pull and push)

We need to send in the EDI process, the allocation by store information to the vendor using pull and push process.
When we have pull process, we can do some enchacement in ORDERS IDOC, by the push process, somebody knows what IDOC we can use to send this information to vendor?
Regards,
Laura Yunaka

Hello,
Order information is sent to vendors using IDOC type ORDERS05 with message type ORDERS/ORDCHG (Create/Change).
Thanks,
Venu

Similar Messages

Cross Docking Process Flow - ECC6.0

Hi,
Can some explain what is the process flow for cross docking in ECC 6.0. How to mark a customer as Cross docking customer?
Thi sis the process flow we are trying to map in ECC6.0 for croos docking.Please let me know is this process flow can me mapped in ECC? Thanks
     Goods Receipt
     X-dock temporary bin allocated
     Put-away label printed [X-dock put-away bin]
     Delivery created
     Picking TO created
     Picking TO confirmed
     Packing created
     Delivery Note printed
     Shipping labels printed
     Post Goods Issue posted

Hello,
For Oppertunistic Cross dock..
You need to create either Putaway TO/Pick TO and then system checks the cross doc and cancel the TO and create a new TO from 902 to 916. and also updates in the document flow. This you can do with out Cross dock monitor. With out planning the cross dock you can do the cross docking by following the config in help.sap.com.
for more information about the complete config you need to see the sap link below. sure it will help you.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/c6/f85c504afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
thanks.
tkreddy

Pull and Push deployment Horizon

Hello Gurus,
Please let me know the difference between Pull and Push deployment Horizon with their significance during the deployment run.
Thanks,
Siva.

Hello Siva,
Using F1 should help answer your question. However, I have put in the following explaination below:
The Pull Deployment Horizon considers the Fulfillment of Demand from the Distribution Center / Customer. It is that period of time during which the deployment is carried out based on the Distribution Demand. During a Deployment Run, the total Distribution Demand within this Horizon is fulfilled.
This type of Deployment depends also on the Push Distribution setting. For a value of P (Pull/Push), the demand within the Horizon is Fulfilled immediately. For a value of Pull, the demand is Fulfilled on the due date.
For Example: at the beginning of a month,
1. The Pull Deployment Horizon is 15 Days
2. Two Distribution Demands exist at the 10th and 15th of the month
The result is, the Deployment considers only that demand confirmed on the 10th (Requirement is fulfilled immediately / on the 10th, based on the Push Distribution Setting)
The Push Deployment Horizon, in comparison, considers the distribution of the stock on hand from the Manufacturing Plant. This is the period of time, over which the deployment considers receipts that were defined in the ATD Receipt category of the location master.
For the purposes of Deployment, the date at which the Stock on Hand at the Plant is distributed is determined based on the Push Distribution setting. Only stock on hand within the push deployment horizon is taken into account for push deployment.
For Example: at the beginning of a month,
1. The Pull Deployment Horizon is 15 Days
2. Two confirmed productions (confirmed stock) exist at the 10th and 15th of the month
3. The ATD Receipt Category considers only categories for confirmed production.
The result is, during the Deployment run, only the production confirmed on the 10th, is taken into account.
Let me know if you have any more questions.
Thanks and Regards,
Sharath Krishnan

Cross docking process with SD

Hello Experts!
I woukd like to know the impact of the crossdocking process in ERP without WM and only with SD.
Which movemens are made in SD?
How the system responds only with an SD process with sales order -> outbound delivery when we have an cross docking process?
Thanks
Lina

Hi Lina,
Refer to this link, hope this will help.
[Cross Docking Customization|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/business_maps/guid/eg1slxvyat1odhrwoi8vc29sdxrpb25jb21wb3nlci5zyxauy29tl3nvy292awv3l21jcgdl%0d%0adc5hc3a/cgfja2fnzwlkpsz2awv3pxnty3jlbmrlcjimawq9otq3mdy1mufenzg4ndc0otgzmeu1%0d%0aotlbq0y0ntreouumjnhzbc1iyxnlpwh0dha6ly9zb2x1dglvbmnvbxbvc2vylnnhcc5jb20vc29j%0d%0ab3zpzxcvbwnwz2v0x21pbwuuyxnwp3vybd1zzg5fbmv3lyymd2vilxvybd1odhrwczovl3nvbhv0%0d%0aaw9uy29tcg9zzxiuc2fwlmnvbs9zb2nvdmlldy9ty3bnzxrfbwltzs5hc3a/dxjspsymehnslwxp%0d%0ac3q9c2rux2dlbmvyywxfcmvuzgvylnhzbhq7c2rux2xpbmtyzxdyaxrpbmcuehnsddtnzw5lcmf0%0d%0azuhutuxfu0rolnhzbhqmjnbhy2thz2utawq9jizyzxnvdxjjzxr5cgu9c2rux3nvbhv0aw9ux2nv%0d%0abxbvc2vyx2z1bgxwywdljizwyxjlbnrssuq9l2j1c2luzxnzx21hchmvnkjfody2rjk5oeiwney4%0d%0anjlbnzc4mzm4mungqtcxnzavrdgzoda5qkq5ntbbndzfqke1mzk1mja3rjy4mzmxruivm0e2njc4%0d%0aqzzgmerendddnkjfmjkzmja4q0y0ouixruyvrja5n0uyquexmjzenejbodhbnde3meq4mevdrkmw%0d%0amjivmjjcotjgqza1otlenenfmeeyrtuwnzayrkqwmdi5qzeueg1sjiz0axrszt1dcm9zcybeb2nr%0d%0aaw5njiz2axj0dwfspxrydwu=?prtmode=default]
Thanks,
Raja

I submitted my trade in and then placed order for iphone 6 - processed payment and everything - no email confirmation was sent and no order history on my acount - did it go through or not???

I submitted my trade in and then placed order for iphone 6 - processed payment and everything - no email confirmation was sent and no order history on my account - did it go through or not???

Seeyasoon,
I know this is something that I would be worrying about too, and I want to ease your mind. I've sent you a direct message and look forward to assisting you there.
SarahO_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Custom vibrations for incoming email, text, iMessage and Push

I need help to create my own custom vibrations for incoming text, email, and push notifications. I dislike short alert vibrating. Need long alert vibrating. How to set up it?

u have only choice for vibration, for ur notification .
Sounds >> vibrate .. No customs vibration

Transporttaion Cross Docking between EWM and ECC across company codes

Seceanrio is as follows:
We have an EWM managed site in GB, and an IM managed site in IE.
We would like to use the transportation cross docking solution from within Service Parts Management to transfer goods from GB to IE, (ECC > EWM > ECC) across company codes.
Is this possible within the standard SAP solution?
Thanks in advance,
Craig Bramhald

Hi Hari
Inter Company Purchase scenario works when the same material exists in both the company codes... I dont know how SAP would manage this in the case of Assets, when the Same Asset No is not existent in the other Co Code...
However, Refer 1523976 PurchaseOrderERPRequest_In_V1:Asset account assignment fails
This applies to EhP4 / EhP5 - But I dont know if you are using the enterprise service PurchaseOrderERPRequest_In_V1 ....
If not, better create an OSS message to SAP and check with them mentioning the notes that you have mentioned in your message
BR,Ajay M

EDI for creation of Sales Order and sending copy of Invoice

Hello Experts,
I am working on EDI. We have a scenario, where the purchase order created in the 3rd party system has to be converted into a sales order in our SAP system.
Then, the regular flow would follow uptil delivery and creation of invoice in SAP.
We have to send a copy of this Invoice back to the 3rd party system.
So, in effect, we would have EDI at two points, while capturing the PO from the 3rd party and another when sending a copy of the Invoice back to the 3rd party.
Please advise on how to go about implementing EDI in the above mentioned scenarios.
Regards,
Divyata

Use EDI 850 Process code ORDE FM IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS for PO (Inbound)
use EDI 810 Process code SD09 FM IDOC_OUTPUT_INVOIC for Invoic (Outbound)
Edited by: srini korada on Jun 9, 2011 4:51 PM

IS-R: Picking in Flow Through and Cross Docking

In Merchandise Distribution (conceptually),
- for recipient-driven flow through, picking is done before GI.
- for cross-docking, no picking.
Which configuration controls the picking has to be done in flow-through and not to be done in cross-docking?

>
Vitthavat A. wrote:
> In Merchandise Distribution (conceptually),
> - for recipient-driven flow through, picking is done before GI.
> - for cross-docking, no picking.
>
> Which configuration controls the picking has to be done in flow-through and not to be done in cross-docking?
Hi,
Path - IMG - Logistics General - Merchandise Distribution -- Plant Profiles for Merchandise Distribution
If you indicate not relevant for picking
or
Delivery Item category - OVLP
Same indicator is available at delivery item category
Regards
Vijai Jain

Process Administrator and Workspace admin url for 10gR3

I am running 10gR3 bpm locally.
Url to access my local workspace is http://localhost:8585/workspace/faces/jsf/workspace/workspace.xhtml
Could you let me know the URL for accessing the process administrator and workspace admin.
Thanks in advance.

Looking at your port 8585 it is the default port for Studio, in Studio there is no webconsole or workspace administrator, those applications only are available in enterprise.
If your case is enterprise then the url is /webconsole and /portaladmin
HTH

Opportunistic cross-docking not working

Hi All,
We are trying to implement opportunistic cross-docking process. My understanding is that during the creation of the goods receipt TO the system looks for any open picking TO and accordingly directly moves material from 902 to 916 storage type. The following configuration is done
1. For the warehouse opportunistic cross-docking has been activating by selecting option 4.
2. Cross-docking relevancy has been defined for movement type 101
3. For movement type 101, the 'Consider pre-allocated' check box is not ticked
4. In the respective movement types 1 & 2 for 'TO creation' are entered as screen control in movement types 101 and 601
5. No automatic confirmation for TO is set up
The following transactions are now done
1. Create a sales order with outbound delivery and TO created (not confirmed)
2. PO with MIGO (we are not using HU and hence no inbound delivery)
3. Now during the creation of the TO for the goods receipt, the expectation is that the system will look for the open picking TO and will cancel the same and then create the putaway TO directly from 902 to 916. But this does not happen.
Not sure if I am missing some setting or some transaction needs to be done differently. I went through SAP help but it does not give more details on what setting might be missing.
Regards,
Ketan

Hi Jurgen,
Thanks for the link. But I had already gone through it and configured the system accordngly. The surprising part is that corss-docking is working for outboud documents i.e. if i create a TO for inbound first and then for outbound then while creating the TO for outbound it automatically takes the source as 902 and cancels the put away TO. However for other way round where the outbound TO is first created and then the inbound, the expectation is that reverse should happen i.e. the destination in the TO should be taken as 916 and original picking TO should be cancelled. However it is not happening.
In the link it talks about points 5 & 6 which are only for HU environment and since we do not have the same I have not configured those. But my question now would be is it that opportunistic inbound cross-docking can only be possible with HU but not required for outbound. Else I do not see any other reason why this might be happening.

Cross Docking with LE-WM - or - Reactivating Back Orders upon Goods Receipt

I have been reviewing the documentation for Opportunistic and Planned Cross Docking in LE-WM. The requirement is to release Back Orders upon receipt of a shipment to avoid putting them away and picking them right away from the bin. We want to release the Back Orders for picking in the GR area at the time of receipt.
So far it appears that Opportunistic Cross Docking depends on a Transfer Order already existing. The system then cancels the existing TO and replaces it with a TO to pick from the receipt Storage Type.
Planned Cross Docking appears to require an existing Outbound Delivery to the expected Inbound Delivery.
In the case of a Back Order, no Outbound Delivery or Transfer Order exist since there is no stock to release until the goods are received.
Is there a way to release Back Orders to be picked directly from Goods Receipt?
Thanks;
Jim

The problem is that all the information I found so far about it is over the process of external goods coming and sending they out without the need of storing in the warehouse. They go directly to the picking area (one step) or in two step process going first from 902 (Good receive from external) to Cross docking Sorage type.and another movement from Cross Docking Storage type to 916 Good issue Storage type.
I need to know if it is possible to implement a solution of Cross Docking for certain number of products having a factory and a warehouse. If so, would you give me a brief process flow?.
Thank You very much.
Al
Edited by: agmogena on Aug 22, 2011 12:01 PM

Not able to link inbound to outbound in cross dock

Hi,
we have a warehouse managment setup in our project we are using cross dock process linking of my inboun delivery to outbound delivery. In my inbound delivery consits of 2 materials amd my outbound also consists of the same materials while i am going to connect this inbound delivery to outbound delivery. The inbound is giving all the materials and while the outbound is showing only one item cross dock monitor but the second item is present in outbound delivery but it is not displaying in the monitor tool.
Can any one let me know.
sunil

Can you give me some more inputs on this? I need to know exactly what is the role of ware house there? What exactly you are doing in cross docking? Are you shipping the material received through inbound process by just putting in another truck? What mvt types are used here both for inbound and out bound?

Cross Docking from a Factory

Hi all,
I´m doing a first approach to cross docking, So far what I read about it is that the goods are taken from goods receipt to goods issue without being placed in storage in the meantime.
My customer is a factory. They heard about the Cross Docking advantages improving the process in the Warehouse and avoiding storage and inventory tasks (they are using WM).
Iu2019m not sure if Cross Docking can be the way for improving the process of producing and sending to costumers without storing in the warehouse or there is a easy way to follow with not Cross Docking involved.
Thank You
Al

The problem is that all the information I found so far about it is over the process of external goods coming and sending they out without the need of storing in the warehouse. They go directly to the picking area (one step) or in two step process going first from 902 (Good receive from external) to Cross docking Sorage type.and another movement from Cross Docking Storage type to 916 Good issue Storage type.
I need to know if it is possible to implement a solution of Cross Docking for certain number of products having a factory and a warehouse. If so, would you give me a brief process flow?.
Thank You very much.
Al
Edited by: agmogena on Aug 22, 2011 12:01 PM

Cross docking functionality in SAP F&R

Hi All,
    I want to know how the cross docking functionality is handled in SAP F&R.
   Whether I should give RP type 11 in store level and RP type 01/02 in DC level for these cross docking products?
   Whether anyone has done the dynamic allocation functionality for cross docking products in which there should be an option to send the latest Order proposal values to ECC from SAP F&R so that STO s can be done with those new OP values?
Regards,
Resmi Raj.

Hi Eduardo,
Thanks for your reply. I have the similar scenario
Herein, we have kept relationship as mentioned below
Article: 100050
Store: FRS4
DC: FRD4
Vendor - TESTVEND1
For Vendor -> DC, we have maintained the distribution profile as FTM (Cross docking) and the RP type for article as 01
For DC -> Store, we have maintained RP type as 11
Now when we have updated the consumption data for both DC & store for the article at DC / store. We ran FRP for both DC (FRD4) and store (FRS4). The order proposal was getting created correctly for store, while no order proposal was created for DC as per the RP type.
Now, how is it being classified as a Cross docking scenario as we expect that the OP (STO's), once their inbound delivery is created, then they should be cumulated in ECC and generated a collective PO for Cross docking. Is that correct. Also, can you please let know the exact process to be followed for the same.
thanks
Best Regards
Prashant

EDI for cross docking process (pull and push)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for