EDI messages for transportation carriers

what are the main EDI types associated with shipment by a carrier, we want to be able to update this information in the delivery document when we are planning shipment with a proposed carrier to our customers, I have investigated the possibilities of using Idoc type SHPMNT03 message type SHPMNT, does anyone have a working knowledge of this business scenario
To this effect the carrier has sent us a document with their EDI interface so we have to map our requirements

Thanks for your reply.
You are right that the customer wants a referene number and therefore the delivery number can be used ... so when the POD comes back the delivery number will be referenced ... but my issue is with the items in the delivery
We could have items 900001, 900002 etc and each of these need to be referenced in the POD. So the custoomer woudl need to reference these which I dont think they are likely to do.
I also suspect I am wrong .. but when I try the POD IDOC with WE19 test tool I have to enter the item number .. so either the customer has to send it or we have to do some ABAP to identify the item somehow I think?
Thanks for any more thoughts

Similar Messages

EDI messages for ASN and POD - general flow

Hi,
We are looking to send an Advance Shipping Notification Idoc / EDI message to our customer as we despatach and they will send a Proof Of Delivery EDI message to us confirming receipt and quantities.
Am I right in saying that the customer MUST take our delivery item numbers and refer to them with the POD message so that we know which item they are refering to? I think they should otherwise we won't know which item they are referring to. On the other hand I cannot see customers being interested in our item numbers.
Any experience on this?
Thanks

Thanks for your reply.
You are right that the customer wants a referene number and therefore the delivery number can be used ... so when the POD comes back the delivery number will be referenced ... but my issue is with the items in the delivery
We could have items 900001, 900002 etc and each of these need to be referenced in the POD. So the custoomer woudl need to reference these which I dont think they are likely to do.
I also suspect I am wrong .. but when I try the POD IDOC with WE19 test tool I have to enter the item number .. so either the customer has to send it or we have to do some ABAP to identify the item somehow I think?
Thanks for any more thoughts

Problem with Outbound EDI messages for shipping

Hi Experts,
we automatically generate the output SHAD (for shipment notification SHPADV) into the SD-transport.
We are facing the problem that sometimes the output works (green) and sometimes not (yellow).
When not, the status of the SHAD output is yellow and we can't find it into the VT70.
Any idea ?
PS: the SD-Transport has been generated into a Z-Programm and Batch Input.
With Regards,
David

Hi,
This could be the problem of confilting namespace or combinations.
in receive action just check that right message interface is configured at Inbound side.
just check any place void ?
1)just check the name as case sensitive.
2)Just check is there interface belongs to right software component.
3)Just check mapping assigned to the right combination or not.
its better to cross check all the component are assigned to right place or not.
****if helpful then rewards points
Regards,
Sumit Gupta

EDI Message for Scheduling Agreement Schedule Lines

Hi Experts,
My client has the EDI set up for the SASL and is running fine.
Currently we have scheduled background program to trigger the IDOC and convert the IDOC into XML to send the information to the external system via interface after MRP run.Output type in the SASL will be triggered at header level (Without release documentation) whenever there is a new or change in the schedule line. Schedule line will be fixed automatically for every MRP run based on the Firm zone maintained in scheduling agreement.
Now the requirement is, Client wants to send the schedule lines regardless of New or change after MRP run sothat all the information will be sent to the suppliers. This requirement may be contradictory one but the client needs it.
1) For the New schedule line creation the output type will be triggered so no issues the program will take care
2) For the change schedule line also the output type will be triggered so No problem.
Requirement :
1) When there is no new & change in the schedule lines , how we can handle this???
2) Client wants to fix the schedule lines based on the planned delivery time and they do not want to maintain this PDT in the Firm zone field.??
Kindle explore and provide me the inputs. Appreciate your help.
Thanks /Karthik

Can you elaborate bit more on the issue.
see if you are not mentioning the PDT in the firm zone field. then it means the schedule lines can be changed and once they are changed the change idoc will get trigger.
however if there is no change in the schedule line and since its a old one there will not be any idoc generation for this.
seems as per your requirement you want to get the idoc generated for the old line as welll then u need to look for the anhancement badi/uer exit to map this.
need more insight of the issue to resolve it

Edi messages for stock transfer

Hello gurus,
lately our company has start to use service of the external warehouse. I was asked to organise the process of the inventory stock transfer between warehouse in system, but our external warehouse is 3rd party which is running another system.
so, is it possible to make somehow the stock transfer - e.g. reservations and confirmation of this reservation using EDI?

Thanks for your reply.
You are right that the customer wants a referene number and therefore the delivery number can be used ... so when the POD comes back the delivery number will be referenced ... but my issue is with the items in the delivery
We could have items 900001, 900002 etc and each of these need to be referenced in the POD. So the custoomer woudl need to reference these which I dont think they are likely to do.
I also suspect I am wrong .. but when I try the POD IDOC with WE19 test tool I have to enter the item number .. so either the customer has to send it or we have to do some ABAP to identify the item somehow I think?
Thanks for any more thoughts

EDI Message not Transmitted for Scheduling Agreement

Hi guys!
Does anybody know what should I check to see why the EDI message for a delivery line in the scheduling agreement has not been transmitted? Would really save me
Regards,
Ileana

Hi
First check the message whether it has been processed properly or not . goto ME39 , Check the message(Shift +F1)
if the message is in red, check the processing log,
If the message is in yellow , process the same using ME9E
If the message is in grren means the Idoc's are generated.
Now got Transaction WE05 & Check the IDoc's giving the Basic type - DELFOR02
Give from & to dates based on the rpocessing date of the message.
Here check the Idoc's are in Red or green . If in red check the Message in the Status.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

EDI MESSAGE FILE

Anybody can help me?
We are going to implement EDI with on of our trading partner. We will send and receive EDI message file over the value added network. Anybody can guide me how we will propgate/manipulate this message into our database in oracle and how we will map and translate edi message for outbound as well. we are using oracle 9i and forms 6i. Please can anyone clear step by step.
Faisal.

If these messages can be delivered to the machine your database is running on, I'd suggest using external tables to read in the data. External tables is an evolutionary improvement over SQL*Loader that allows you to query flat files in PL/SQL as if they were read-only database tables.
The Oracle Administrator's Guide http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96521/tables.htm#9046 will take you step-by-step through an example of loading data via external tables.
Justin
Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC

EDI message output for goods movements

Dear experts,
we configured NACE to send EDI messages, when goods movements are created. When we use partner type "VN" (Vendor) and leave the partner number empty, no message is created. Only if the partner number is filled, a message is created. This means, that the partner number is not extracted dynamically from the goods movement and we have to make one NACE entry for each partner. For other applications (e. g. outbound call offs), the partner number in NACE can be left empty and when a document is posted, the receiver partner number is determined dynamically.
Is it possible to modify the processing, so that the partner number is extracted from the goods movement? How can this be done?
Best regards,
David Claes

Hi,
What is the application you selecting for creating ouput?
I don't see output record condition with as combination.
You should be using ME as application area.
Thank you!
Dipak

Message type for Inbound SD EDI message : Sales Order Confirmation

Hi,
There is an EDI message coming into SAP for sales order confirmation post delivery.
The data in the Idoc should then proceed to update the system and create the delivery document.
I need a standard Message Type which when triggered, will perform the above actions.
Will ORDRSP Message type be useful here.
Thanks ,
Ankit

Hi,
Message type/Idoc type
"ORDERS / ORDERS04 --For orders
ORDCHG / ORDERS04 -Order change
ORDRSP / ORDERS04 --PO
DESADV / DELVRY02 --Deivery
INVOIC / INVOIC02"-Invoice
Thanx,
Pramod

TS3367 Carrier maybe charge for sms message for activation yourtime..trouble using facetime on iphone

Carrier maybe charge for sms message for activation yourtime..trouble using facetime on iphone

What is your technical question?

EDI Message output gets processed for held PO

Hi All,
When I save my purchase order as a HELD PO (EKKO-MEMORY=X), EDI Message output gets processed.
Can you please provide me any inputs to disable this.
Regards
Deepak

Hi All,
Can anyone provide any inputs on this.
Regards
Deepak

Error in inbound processing: EDI message - XML Gateway

Hello!
I've setup a DELFOR transaction in B2B and modified XML Gateway settings for internal delivery channel in order to send the message to EBS, but I'm getting weird errors in b2b.log. (XML Gateway in EBS is not setup yet, but it should't be an issue since incoming errors are handled in EBS, and I would just see an inbound transaction with processing errors in Transaction Monitor.)
In the beginning of b2b.log I see this:
2009.07.07 at 15:26:31:897: B2BStarter thread: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: queryInternalDeliveryChannel
2009.07.07 at 15:26:31:897: B2BStarter thread: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: queryInternalDeliveryChannel
2009.07.07 at 15:26:31:897: B2BStarter thread: B2B - (DEBUG) : Tue Jul 07 15:26:31 CEST 2009 inbound initialize
2009.07.07 at 15:26:31:897: B2BStarter thread: B2B - (DEBUG) : Tue Jul 07 15:26:31 CEST 2009 Obtaining inbound connection...
2009.07.07 at 15:26:31:897: B2BStarter thread: B2B - (DEBUG) : Tue Jul 07 15:26:31 CEST 2009 inbound connect string: jdbc:oracle:thin:@server64.xa.si:1521:test2
2009.07.07 at 15:26:31:897: B2BStarter thread: B2B - (DEBUG) : Tue Jul 07 15:26:31 CEST 2009 inbound username: apps
2009.07.07 at 15:26:32:522: B2BStarter thread: B2B - (DEBUG) : Tue Jul 07 15:26:32 CEST 2009 inbound initialize exit
2009.07.07 at 15:26:32:522: B2BStarter thread: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:startListen Enter
2009.07.07 at 15:26:32:538: B2BStarter thread: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:startListen Exit
2009.07.07 at 15:26:32:538: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener:run Thread start
2009.07.07 at 15:26:32:538: B2BStarter thread: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:initialize Exit
2009.07.07 at 15:26:32:538: B2BStarter thread: B2B - (DEBUG) B2BStarter - B2B initialized
After I copy the edi file to the incoming directory B2B starts processing the file:
2009.07.07 at 15:30:01:878: Thread-10: B2B - (DEBUG)
Protocol = File
Version = 1.0
Transport Header
filename:00003442_23.CMS
filesize:12345
file_ext:CMS
fullpath:C:\xa_endpoint\00003442_23.CMS
timestamp:2009-07-06T16:14:29.393+01:00
As I see in the log: B2B finds the trading partner and agreement and all looks fine. But later comes this:
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:909: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler:deliverMessageToDestination Enter
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:909: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler:deliverMessageToDestination deliver message to destination. protocol is XMLGateway Queues
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:909: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler:deliverMessageToDestination deliver message to XMLGW
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:909: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) : Tue Jul 07 15:30:05 CEST 2009 Converting B2B message to ECX message..
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:909: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) : Tue Jul 07 15:30:05 CEST 2009 Inbound - B2BtoECX - Enter
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:909: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) : Tue Jul 07 15:30:05 CEST 2009 B2B Message -
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:909: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) : COLLABORATION_NAME : null
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:909: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) : ACTION_NAME : DELFOR
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:909: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) : DOCUMENT_TYPE : DELFOR
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:909: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) : DOCUMENT_TYPE_REVISION : D97A
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:909: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) : SOURCE_NAME : tpartner
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:909: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) : DESTINATION_NAME : Xa d.d.
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:909: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) : PAYLOAD : UNB+UNOA.............. edi message continues here
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:925: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) : PAYLOAD : <?xml version="1.0" ?><Transaction-DELFOR............... xml continues here
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:925: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) : Tue Jul 07 15:30:05 CEST 2009 ECX Message -
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:925: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler:handleAppMessageRetry Could not deliver the message; exception message is null
2009.07.07 at 15:30:05:925: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler:handleAppMessageRetry No application side retry
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:081: Thread-9: B2B - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-50903: Message "0A14011912255682A58000003257C600-1" retry count is zero
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler.handleAppMessageRetry(MessageHandler.java:394)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler.deliverMessageToDestination(MessageHandler.java:344)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request.putMsg(Request.java:657)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request.continueRequest(Request.java:481)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request.incomingRequest(Request.java:410)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:2062)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:2574)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:2444)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:2399)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:527)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:374)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Last message repeats once more and then:
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:081: Thread-9: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:null
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:081: Thread-9: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: updateBusinessMessage
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:096: Thread-9: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: updateBusinessMessage
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:096: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:updateMsgError(3 params) Exit
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:096: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Enter
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:096: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Transaction.commit()
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:096: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) DBContext commit: Leave
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:096: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.MessageHandler:deliverMessageToDestination Exit
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:096: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request:incomingRequest Exit
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:096: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:XXX: processIncomingMessage setting seq numbers
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processIncomingMessage Call Incoming Request Processor
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request:incomingRequest Enter
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request:incomingRequest TransportBindings created
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request:incomingRequest Create a Message Table Row for Request message with message state Continue Processing
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess:DbAccess:insertMsgTblRow Enter
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:null
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: queryExchangeProtocolRevision
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: queryExchangeProtocolRevision
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Authorization disabled. UserBootstrapped:false, useAuthorization:true, configType:null
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Push Stack: queryDocumentProtocolRevision
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) Pop Stack: queryDocumentProtocolRevision
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: BusinessLogicLayer - (ERROR) Error -: AIP-13115: Not in an active transaction
     at oracle.tip.repos.core.persistency.BaseObject.prologue(BaseObject.java:1408)
     at oracle.tip.repos.core.persistency.BaseObject.createObject(BaseObject.java:913)
     at oracle.tip.model.instance.DataStorage.create(DataStorage.java:794)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.message.MessageStorage.create(MessageStorage.java:145)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.DbAccess.insertMsgTblRow(DbAccess.java:953)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.msgproc.Request.incomingRequest(Request.java:397)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processIncomingMessage(Engine.java:2062)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.incomingContinueProcess(Engine.java:2574)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.handleMessageEvent(Engine.java:2444)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine.processEvents(Engine.java:2399)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.onMessage(MsgListener.java:527)
     at oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.MsgListener.run(MsgListener.java:374)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: BusinessLogicLayer - (DEBUG) setRuntimeActiveandQuiescing()
2009.07.07 at 15:30:06:112: Thread-9: B2B - (DEBUG) oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.engine.Engine:processIncomingMessage General Exception ERROR
Error repeats a few times.
Wire message stays in Processing status, Business message is errored and an exception message is created in ip_in_queue.
Both remote and host delivery channels have retry set to 1. Agreement was re-deployed + all B2B restared, but the problem remained.
Could anyone help with this? What could be wrong?
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
Wanda
PS. I've checked all threads that might have anything to do with this, but found nothing useful.

Hi Anuj,
thanks for taking the time to examine the file.
Answers to your questions:
1. Yes, this is the 1st time for B2B, but the EBS I'm trying to connect to is up and running for approx. 2 years (it's a test instance).
2. Patching was done by the customer's sysadmin, so I don't really have an overview on what and how he did. Result of opatch:
Installed Patch List:
=====================
1) Patch 8298731 applied on Sat Jun 13 09:23:42 CEST 2009
2) Patch 5907304 applied on Thu Jul 17 14:26:55 CEST 2008
3. In theory the sysadmin should have run it, but how could I double-check this?
I know he had problems while applying patch 8298731, but he said it was solved later. (Customer is using windows os, which is making a lot of troubles otherwise.)
Regarding IDC log there is no success. I've restared B2B at least 5 times plus once the database, but still nothing. In tip.properties:
oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.transportTrace = C:\APPS\OAS\ip\log/transport.trc
also I tried the following values:
C:\\APPS\\OAS\\ip\\log/transport.trc (since there is a similar entry: oracle.tip.LogDirectory = C:\\APPS\\OAS\\ip\\log)
C:\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\APPS\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\OAS\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ip\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\log/transport.trc (this was commented before; maybe it comes from some default)
true (I had no other idea)
Result is the same for all the cases: b2b_idc_transport.log file is 0 bytes, but b2b_dc_transport.log has initial data+writes log when processing.
If I remove or comment the above line from tip.properties, then no transport log files are created.
I've updated the agreement to have B2B inbound for the internal delivery channel, re-deployed it and it worked fine -> transaction(s) appeared in IP_IN_QUEUE.
Changing it back to XML Gateway (and re-deploying) causes all original problems.
Regards,
Wanda

Non-EDI messages via AS2 Communication Channel

Hi,
We have many EDI interfaces running via AS2 communication channel provided by Seeburger.
I was wondering whether AS2 should only be used for EDI message or any other normal XML formats also.
If AS2 can be used for other formats also, what is the difference then sending the request via AS2 rather than HTTP.
Since AS2 is using HTTP transport protocol, I could rather use HTTP communication channel itself.
Let me know the differences please!

I was wondering whether AS2 should only be used for EDI message or any other normal XML formats also.
As far as I know, it is not restricted, I used AS2 protocol to transfer flat files in my last project
If AS2 can be used for other formats also, what is the difference then sending the request via AS2 rather than HTTP.
AS2 has more features than plain HTTP, like support MDN message, which allow sender to know the status of receipt immediatly.
AS2 can be used as Aync or Sync.
It can keep file name which is useful in some integration with financial institutes.
Receipts of the file can not deny their receipts of the messages (NonRupdiation)
Since AS2 is using HTTP transport protocol, I could rather use HTTP communication channel itself
Yes, you could, but you might loss the feature that AS2 protocol provides, and some trading partner only ask for AS2 protocol for the transmission of the files.
Regards
Liang

Passing EDI filename for 850 from B2B Gateway to BPEL

Hi,
Is there any way to pass the EDI filename for 850 from B2B Gateway to BPEL via AQ? we want to store the inbound filename in the database along with the PO.
we are using 10g.
Thanks,
Naveen

Hi Naveen,
Generally this could be done using the message id only as mentioned by ew. Just what you need to do is to lookup in the table and find the payload corresponding to that message id.
However, WORKAROUND would be to use "Preserve Filename" feature of 11g B2B (which works only for FILE,FTP and SFTP transport protocols). In this case you have to pass the filename in the header "ACTION", as mentioned by Nitesh.
Regards,
Anuj

Delivery 0080000276 is not relevant for transportation planning.

At the time of (delivery related) invoice creation, system throws a message "check the error log".
Log says:
" Error Log             0080000276 000010 Delivery 0080000276 is not relevant for transportation planning
            LongText
                Detail
                 Diagnosis
                     Copying control for billing requires that shipment costs
                     are copied from the shipment belonging to this delivery.
                     No shipment costs could be determined, because this
                     delivery is not relevant for transportation planning.
                 System Response
                     The system assumes that no shipment costs are to be billed
                     in this case.
            Technical data
                Tech. data details
                 Client                                 251
                 Group Number
                 Sales Document Number                  0080000276
                 Item Number of the SD Document         000010
                 Schedule Line Number                   0306
                 Counter in Control Tables              00
                 Message Identification                 VY
                 System Message Number                  306
                 Output Type                            I
                 Message Variable 01                    0080000276
                 Message Variable 02
                 Message Variable 03
                 Message Variable 04
                 Group Type                             F "
Please advice if anyone have any idea for this error log.

Error Log 0080000276 000010 Delivery 0080000276 is
not relevant for transportation planning
It is not necessary to assign the Transportation Planning to Delivery type. Only recently, I completed a similar configuration and running successfully for a client. The issue is because of your copy control VTFL. For more information, check note 713171.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

EDI messages for transportation carriers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for