EDI structure error

Dear SAP experts,
Can you advise me regarding this error?
Error: javax.resource.ResourceException: --- Conversion of synchronous request from module chain ended with errors ---[Error:ID=2023;LEVEL=1] InhouseDocReader readNextSegment(): offset[1997034(read Segment : LIN)]: caught ReadingException: Length limit exceeded - no SEG. delim. found!!! DESCRIPTION: InhouseDocReader causes an ReadingException while trying to read the next segment of current file, abort
In the error log, it seems that there is an error in LIN segment of the EDI message.
But, i've checked the LIN segment, seems ok.
Here is the sample LIN segment on the EDI,
UNA:.? 'UNBUNOA:24331016000002:144004711000003:14080118:0351000313'UNH23264360SLSRPT:D:96A:UN:EAN004'BGM73E::9'DTM137:20080117:102'DTM90:20080107:102'DTM91:20080113:102'NADSU4011700000005::9'NADCO4331016000002::9'LOC1624330942080010::9'LIN14004711004308:EN::9'PIA10954413001001:BP::92'IMDFZZACU::92:002'PRIAAA:3.82'PRIAAB:4.55'QTY153:1:PCE'QTY145:21:PCE'LIN .....
Kindly advise.
Thank you very much!
Fred

Hi
This is very simple and usual error in EDI
To rectify this you need to refer the implementaion guide of the relevant customer/Vendor and see that all LIN segment mandatory data i.e LIN 01 ,LIN 02 .... are present as per the implementaion guidelines.You need to request your customer to edit and resend the data
Let me know if you need any further help
ramesh

Similar Messages

Issue:EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory segment missing):Idoc extention

Hi all,
I have extended the the standard IDOC MATMAS05 classification view with structure as below-
E1MARAM                        Master material general data (MARA)--->Mandatory segment
     Z1KLART                        KLART --->Extended chaild to E1MARAM
         Z1CLASS                        segment for class --->Extended chaild to Z1KLART
         Z1CHARACTERISTIC               CHARACTERISTIC --->Extended chaild to Z1KLART
     E1MARA1                        Additional Fields for E1MARAM
     E1MAKTM                        Master material short texts (MAKT) --->Mandatory segment(Child   to
E1MARAM )
I am getting an error in IDOC fro material master as:EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory segment missing ).
Diagnosys By system is :*The segment E1MAKTM has the attribute 'Mandatory' in the syntax description of the basic type MATMAS05 (customer enhancement ZMATMAS05). However, the segment is missing in the IDoc. The segment number logged in the status record identifies the item before which the segment is missing.
This error may have been triggered by an unidentifiable segment before the expected mandatory segment.*
Please help to resolve the issue.
Thank you.
Edited by: sanu debu on Apr 30, 2009 11:25 AM
Edited by: sanu debu on Apr 30, 2009 11:31 AM

Hi,
   You cannot add an segment in the middle of other segments.
YOu have to add any segment at the last.
If you want to add a segment as the child of another segment, it should be added after the last child of the parent segment.
In you case, you have to add your segment after the E1CUCFG segment.(NOt under that segement)
Regards,
Ravi Kanth Talagana

Regarding EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)

Hi,
My requirement is that I was adding two diffrent field values under two diffrent segments as "E1EDKA1" and "E1EDK02" in outbound invoice IDOCS, INVOIC02 (process code: SD09 - IDOC_OUTPUT_INVOIC).
I am getting the IDOC number through Tcode "VF02". Can any body give me idea how to check that syntax error in debug mode.
Please find the following error details using TCODE "WE02".
*EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)*
*Message no. E0 078*
*Diagnosis*
*The segment E1EDKA1 does not occur at the current level of the basic type INVOIC02 (extension ).*
*This error can have several reasons:*
*The segment E1EDKA1 is assigned to a group whose header segment does not occur.*
*The segment E1EDKA1 does not exist in the syntax description of the basic type INVOIC02 (extension ).*
*The sequence of segments in the group in which the segment appears is incorrect.*
*Previous errors ('mandatory' segment or group missing) may be due to this error.*
Please help me to resolve this problem. <REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Regards,
Skumar.
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Apr 28, 2008 1:09 PM

It seems that you added segment E1EDKA1 at a place where it is not supposed to be. That's where this error is coming from. The structure of every IDOC is definded by SAP standard and you cannot change the sequence or the level of standard segments. If you require a certain field at a certain level you have to add that field to a Z-segment and then add that Z-segment where appropriate in your extension.
Hope that helps,
Michael

Directory Structure Errors

In TechTools ( came with Applecare ) i got a failed on Directory Structure, second time since owning my couple month old machine, first time apple recomended reloading.
i dont mishandle it, dont bump, dent, etc, the laptop.
but all of a sudden sometimes my USB keyboard/mouse wont register as being plugged in all the time / techtools HDD errors.
only recent think if done is instal Onyx to look over the logs, and little while after ( days ) the issues started hapening,, same with last time, but didnt think it was Onyx, now im starting to wonder, anybody else have any issues like this, and Would Onyx couse it ( doubt it, but since onyx goes deep into the system, no idea )

It is an interesting coincidence that I came across this thread today because I had the exact same issue myself last night.
I have plenty of space available on my HDD 73.1GB.
I downloaded the latest Onyx last night and when it starts it checks the disk. I got an error on the startup volume so I ran Tech Tools as well.
TechTools came up with that same failed Directory Structure error.
I next tried to reboot the comptuer holding down Apple/S and entering fsck -fy
That resulted in errors. Tried re-running it 3-4 tims to see if it would resolve anything but got the same error with every attempt.
I then booted from DiskWarrior and ran that. It seemed to correct a number of issues and now TechTools, Onyx, Disk Utility etc. find no problems. But it was kind of an odd occurance and interesting to find I was not alone in getting that last night.
The odd thing though is that I also checked my Mac Pro while I was wating on this one to finish and had directory errors on that one as well so had to run DiskWarrior on both.
I was kind of concerned about that to say the least.

'Structured' error handling and reentrancy

The parentheses in the subject are due to the fact that I'm not using the Structured Error Handler reference library, but have rolled my own to do something similar but in the manner I want it to. I don't actually use the SEH (haven't even got it installed at the moment on this PC) so am not sure exactly how it works under the hood.
I have a reasonably large application with a number of distinct parallel modules (GUI, state module, communication, motion control). The final parallel module is an error handling module. This consists of two queues - one for incoming errors, and one for outgoing actions. Errors are dequeued and their codes checked for their category (critical, warning, ignore or unclassified, for instance) and the appropriate category is returned to a local error handler via the action queue. When an error is passed to a local error handler VI, it enqueues the error to the main handler and waits for a response to that particular error.
This all works nicely, in much the same way the SEH would do. However, with either the SEH or my local error handler method, I find myself wondering how often to place these down and the consequences of doing so. If they're non-reentrant, I imagine I may end up with lots of parallel processes sitting patiently to access the VI as it's blocked by another, causing jitter. If I go pre-allocated clone, I could potentially have many many callers using this function, which strikes me as a bit of a waste of resources. My gut feel is to go with shared-allocation clones, as the vast majority of the time it'll be no error passed through an empty case, and not to place them in absolutely every subVI - just perhaps after a state executes in the state handler, in all the parallel loops of the submodules etc.
Just wondering what anyone else does with their error handling solution, and whether my thoughts make sense.
CLD

Having chatted to my friendly neighbourhood Spiderman Architect, he suggested I should probably just stop being a wimp and just use pre-allocated clones to avoid the jitter and to stop worrying about the resource hit, as you suggest
I'll use the same code on both PC host and RT host, hence the jitter concerns on the RT.
Thanks for the thoughts!
CLD

Turning off the structure errors in JDeveloper 10.1.3.2

Is there a way to turn off the structure errors in for .jsp pages in JDeveloper 10.1.3.2.
Many of the pages show "Element blah not expected" or "attribute missing"
The app I'm working on has lots of old code from a range of developers and I really don't need to see the errors of their/my ways if they are truly no show stoppers.
In the previous version this was not nearly as prevalent and it displays in 10.1.3.2.
Thanks,
LP

Hi,
actually previous versions didn't have error margins at all. There is no preference setting I am aware of to switch the error messages off
Frank

Volume structure error -694???

Ran tech tool cd and it could not fix volume structure error and showed error -694. Does anyone know what this means?
Just archived and reinstalled OSX yesterday to fix a boot up problem, which it did. But now after doing the needed updates - whenever I try to type something in firefox a gray screen with the power button logo pops up and says I have to restart - and when I try to open multiple documents into photoshop it won't open them - only individually.
So I figured something must be wrong - and ran the apple hardware test, disk utility and then the tech tool deluxe. Then I got the volume structure error which tech tool could not fix. Could it have something to do with permissions errors? I was trying to fix permissions and everytime I do, I get the same corrections which seems weird. Anyone got any suggestions?
I have an imac G5 with OSX version 10.3.9. 1.8 Ghz with 768MB Memory.
Here's the permissions errors I am having :
: for architecture i386 object: ./Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunes malformed object (unknown flavor for flavor number 0 in LC_UNIXTHREAD command 27 can't byte swap it)
: for architecture i386 object: ./Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/Resources/iTunesHelper.app/Contents/MacOS/iT unesHelper malformed object (unknown flavor for flavor number 0 in LC_UNIXTHREAD command 13 can't byte swap it)
We are using special permissions for the file or directory ./Library/ColorSync/Profiles/Displays. New permissions are 16893
We are using special permissions for the file or directory ./Library/ColorSync/Profiles. New permissions are 16893
We are using special permissions for the file or directory ./System/Library/Filesystems/cd9660.fs/cd9660.util. New permissions are 33261
We are using a special uid for the file or directory ./private/var/at/jobs. New uid is 1
We are using a special uid for the file or directory ./private/var/at/spool. New uid is 1
The privileges have been verified or repaired on the selected volume
Verify/repair finished permissions on disk disk0s3 Macintosh HD
Any help would be great. I can still use my computer - but I want to get this fixed before bigger things happen...

The error -694 message means that one part of your hard disk is listed as being part of two or more files; using the Disk Utility's Repair Disk option may identify these files.
The output of the Repair Permissions command indicates that you're using a version of iTunes which the mechanism can't properly handle, and the others are status messages. You shouldn't be concerned about any of those messages.
(12347)

Recurring "Invalid Node Structure error"

Hello all,
Starting a new thread with this one....
Have done 5 complete re-partitions, clean SL installs and back ups from TM in the last four days. DU disk checks out fine after re-install, DU comes up clean.
After a few hours, the hanging beach ball returns, I run DU and get the "Invalid Node Structure" error message.
This in on the iMac that is 42 days out of Apple care......
Ran techTool after the last install, and it comes up clean....
What's the soultion? Nuke the drive and get a new on on my dime?
I've repartitioned, zeroed out the data and sit here with a naked drive, I really don't want to spend another day loading it up if it's shot....
The TM files and drive I'm backing up from check out fine.
Thanks,
Mark

Took 3+ hours. Came up clean. I have not restored from TM yet. Did the SL updates ect.
Repaired permissions, ran DU it comes up clean.
I will do some net surfing tonight (that's all I did this morning) still without loading the back up data, and we'll see if I get the beachball of death.
I will run another surface scan when I hit the hay, and see what it says in the morning.
If that is clean, I will restore the back up data, and run the surface scan again.
One step at a time until I can recreate (or not) the failure mode.
Tedious, but I have to get to the bottom of this. I don't want to load any of the TM back up on to the Mac Air until I'm sure it's not a software issue.
Mark

Idoc Error - EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)

Hi All,
have created a new reduced message type for our new vendor A/C group through BD53. Also done reqd config for sending the vendor master through this message type. .
I have created couple of vendors for testing with X01 with withholding tax functionality and when try to send these vendors , Idocs are getting failed .
When I create vendor without withholding tax functionality , idoc is getting posted succesfully . If create vendor with entries in the feild whih are related to withholding tax . Idocs are getting failed .
If I see the status in WE05 ,Idocs which are posted succefully are showing the basic type as CREMAS03 . For idocs which are getting failed have the basic type as CREMAS04 and also the extension as Z1CREMAS . I don`t understand why the system is defaulting CREMA04 & Z1CREMAS when I send the vendor master with withholding tax feild entries.
I am not much familiar with ALE /Idoc set up. Please can any body help me to resolve the issue.
The error message in we05 as below
EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)
Message no. E0078
Diagnosis
The segment Z1LFA1M does not occur at the current level of the basic type CREMAS04 (extension Z1CREMAS).
This error can have several reasons:
The segment Z1LFA1M is assigned to a group whose header segment does not occur.
The segment Z1LFA1M does not exist in the syntax description of the basic type CREMAS04 (extension Z1CREMAS).
The sequence of segments in the group in which the segment appears is incorrect.
Previous errors ('mandatory' segment or group missing) may be due to this error.
Procedure
Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type CREMAS04 (extension Z1CREMAS).
Thanks

Hi,
I don`t understand what do you mean release after adding segment.
Message type works i.e. Idoc get posted if I send with the vendor w/o withholding tax field entries. Idoc fails when send vendor with withholding tax field entry.
Regards

IDOC Status 26: EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified).

Hi All,
I have created IDOC extension for IDOC Basic type "PROACT01" and have followed all required necessary steps but getting IDOC
Status 26. EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified). The exact error is:
Please check Error Details and the details of the steps I followed for Setting up IDOC Extension:
Error Detail :
EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)
Message no. E0078
Diagnosis
The segment ZPROSEG does not occur at the current level of the basic type PROACT01 (extension PROACTEX).
This error can have several reasons:
The segment ZPROSEG is assigned to a group whose header segment does not occur.
The segment ZPROSEG does not exist in the syntax description of the basic type PROACT01 (extension PROACTEX).
The sequence of segments in the group in which the segment appears is incorrect.
Previous errors ('mandatory' segment or group missing) may be due to this error.
Procedure
Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type PROACT01 (extension PROACTEX).
Can you please look at this problem and suggest what is wrong with IDOC Extension/Custome Segment?
Below is the Details of the Steps which I have followed:
1. Tcode WE31 - Created new custom Segment ZPROSEG with 4 fields. Released segment.
2. TCode WE30 - Created IDOC Extension PROACTEX for Basic Type PROACT01. Released IDOC extension.
Here when I run syntax check warning appears "No predecessors exist". I am not sure if its okay!!
3. TCode WE82 - Added Extension PROACTEX in the Message Type PROACT with BASIC Type PROACT01.
4. TCode WE20 - Added IDOC Extension PROACTEX in the predefined partner profile in WE20 transaction.
5. Added the following code in the Customer Exit EXIT_SAPLWVMI_001 include ZXWVMIU01 .
DATA segnam(27).
READ TABLE dedidd WITH KEY segnam = 'ZPROSEG'.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
LOOP AT dedidd WHERE segnam = 'E1EDP31'.
CLEAR dedidd.
dedidd-segnam = 'ZPROSEG'.
zproseg-matnr = 'Mat1'.
zproseg-lgort = '001'.
zproseg-gernr = 'SNo1'.
zproseg-labst = 2.
dedidd-sdata = zproseg.
APPEND dedidd.
ENDLOOP.
ENDIF.
Finally ran transaction WVM2 (Transfer of Stock & Sales Data) to generate IDOC, its creating IDOC but when checked IDOC in WE05 its getting Status Error "26".
Looking forward for your reply.
Many thanks in advance.

Hello,
Actually you are appending the Z segment instead of inserting into the correct position. So the segment is added at the last, so hierarchy of segments is collapsed.
So get the index of the previous segment E1EDP31 and increase the index by 1 and INSERT the Z segment with that new index as below.
LOOP AT dedidd WHERE segnam = 'E1EDP31'.
lv_index = sy-tabix. " <<--
ADD 1 TO lv_index. " <<--
CLEAR dedidd.
dedidd-segnam = 'ZPROSEG'.
zproseg-matnr = 'Mat1'.
zproseg-lgort = '001'.
zproseg-gernr = 'SNo1'.
zproseg-labst = 2.
dedidd-sdata = zproseg.
*APPEND dedidd.
INSERT dedidd INDEX lv_index. " <<---
ENDLOOP.
Here actually we are insering the record inside the LOOP and it regenerates the index again. It is not actually a good practice.
So the best practice is get the index and generate the segment inside the loop, store them into another internal table, come out the loop and insert the Z segments into DEDIDD by looping the new internal table.

EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)

Hi All,
Im facing the below error EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified).
And this error is coming only for few idocs rest are getting processed successfully.
Message no. E0078
Diagnosis
The segment E1EDP03 does not occur at the current level of the basic type ORDERS05 (extension ).
This error can have several reasons:
The segment E1EDP03 is assigned to a group whose header segment does not occur.
The segment E1EDP03 does not exist in the syntax description of the basic type ORDERS05 (extension ).
The sequence of segments in the group in which the segment appears is incorrect.
Previous errors ('mandatory' segment or group missing) may be due to this error.
Procedure
Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type ORDERS05 (extension ).
Please suugest.
Thanks,
Spandana

Hi,
Is this standard program or custom program?
you might be appending the Z segment instead of inserting it. Always best practice is get the index of the segment and instert it.
If all the data is not populated then segment position will change incase of appending. Please check your code and revert back.
Refer the below link for detailed information.
IDOC Status 26: EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified).
Thank you

EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory group/segment missing)

hi EDI/IDoc experts,
Need you help urgently. According to the requirement, i need populate a segement E1IDT01 of basic type PEXR2002 . I added the code , then run and generate an idoc , the new segment
E1IDT01 was populated, but Syntax error 26 happend. Error message as below.   It also strange that i can see E1IDKU5 populate out as usual, but some others segment disappeared , i am sure that in my code ,i didn't changed any variable related to other segement . how can i fix this problem?
EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory group missing)
Message no. E0079
Diagnosis
The segment group E1IDKU5 has the attribute 'Mandatory' in the syntax description of the basic type PEXR2002 (customer enhancement ). However, the segment group is missing in the IDoc. The segment number logged in the status record identifies the item before which the segment group is missing.
Procedure
Please check the IDoc or the syntax description of the basic type PEXR2002 (customer enhancement ).

Hi all,
Thanks so much for your concern!
Finally ,this problem has been figured out .
Requirement is user want to use segment E1IDT01 in idoc to populate the long text they maintained in accounting document vendor item line (use FB01 to create accounting doc).
Why I made out " EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory group/segment missing)" this message out ,because I didn't fill data correctly. I missed to keep SY-TABIX in momory .
when we use Function module ,or do..enddo...or read table it_table. we should be careful that SY-TABIX is changed .So we can't just use MODIFY EDIDD_TABLE INDEX SY-TABIX in the last . we should define a local variable to keep SY-TABIX in memory and then use it to modify EDIDD_TABLE.
Follow is the final code.
IF SEGMENT_NAME = 'E1IDT01'.
TABLES :STXL.
* Define for long text getting
DATA: LIT_TLINE LIKE TLINE   OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: LV_STRING(2000) TYPE C.
DATA: LV_TDNAME TYPE THEAD-TDNAME,
        LV_ID     TYPE THEAD-TDID     VALUE '0001',
        LV_LANG   TYPE THEAD-TDSPRAS VALUE 'E' ,
        LV_OBJ    TYPE THEAD-TDOBJECT VALUE 'DOC_ITEM'.
data:   LV_LINE   TYPE I,                " long Text lines
        LV_LEN    TYPE I,                " long Text length
        LV_TABIX LIKE SY-TABIX.
* Clear memory
CLEAR:LV_TDNAME,
        LV_STRING,
        LV_LINE,
        LIT_TLINE, LIT_TLINE[],
        LV_LEN,
        LV_TABIX.
* Keep sy-tabix memory using a variable--This is the key point
LV_TABIX = SY-TABIX.
* Combine TDNAME with company code + accounting doc + fiscal year + item number.
    CONCATENATE REGUP_DATA-BUKRS REGUP_DATA-BELNR
                 REGUP_DATA-GJAHR REGUP_DATA-BUZEI INTO LV_TDNAME.
* When vendor item has long text , read long text into lv_string
    SELECT SINGLE *
      FROM STXL
      WHERE TDOBJECT = LV_OBJ
        AND TDNAME   = LV_TDNAME
        AND TDID     = LV_ID
        AND TDSPRAS = 'E'.
    IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
      CALL FUNCTION 'READ_TEXT'
        EXPORTING
          CLIENT   = SY-MANDT
          ID       = LV_ID
          LANGUAGE = LV_LANG
          NAME     = LV_TDNAME
          OBJECT   = LV_OBJ
        TABLES
          LINES    = LIT_TLINE.
      IF NOT LIT_TLINE[] IS INITIAL.
        DESCRIBE TABLE LIT_TLINE LINES LV_LINE.
        DO LV_LINE TIMES.
          READ TABLE LIT_TLINE INDEX SY-INDEX.
          CONCATENATE LV_STRING LIT_TLINE-TDLINE INTO LV_STRING.
        ENDDO.
        LV_LEN = STRLEN( LV_STRING ).
* Make sure we only need less than 840 charicters
        IF LV_LEN > 840.
          LV_STRING = LV_STRING+0(840).
          LV_LEN    = 840.
        ENDIF.
* Populate Vendor item long text with segment E1IDT01 start from
* Fields TXT03 to TXT14.
         EDIDD_TABLE-SDATA+147(LV_LEN) = LV_STRING.
        MODIFY EDIDD_TABLE INDEX LV_TABIX.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.

EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory segment missing)

HI all,
Error Message - EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (mandatory segment missing)
Status ID - E0
Message No - 072
Status of the IDoc - 26
Please help me how to solve this issue?
Thanks,
Srini

Hi,
This error normally comes up when the sequence of segments has been disturbed.
For successfully posting an IDOC you need to maintain the sequence of the segments as in WE30.
You can also check which segments are mandatory in WE30 by clicking on the segment name and the pop up that comes.
Thanks,
Manish

EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (too many repetitions of a segment)

Hi All -
We are getting an "EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (too many repetitions of a segment)" error message while processing the REMADV message in the payment run program.
Basic Type : PEXR2002
Message Type : REMADV
Segment Name : E1EDP02
This issue is due to BELNR length in above segment, since payment run program assigning the 45 chars but BELNR length is 35 char, is there any way or OSS notes we can implement to rectify the same.
Thanks in Advance.
Rds,
K

Hi,
This error is the segment definition violation. Open your BASIC IDOC type in WE30, double click on the segment TESTIDOC.
In the popup you can see properties like mandatory segment, Minimum number and Max number. Your IDOC is crossing the max number of repetitions it can have. If any of the segment definition perperties like this one, or improper position of the segment etc occurs IDOC is generated with syntax error.
Thanks,
Vinod.

Invalid node structure error when verifying hard disk, please help

My 27" Mid 2011 iMac is having hard disk issues. I attempted to repair the disk but received an error that said the disk cannot be repaired and needs to be re-formatted. I have all my files backed up to an external hard drive so I erased and formatted the disk. After reformatting, I ran the verify disk function and got the message saying the HD appears to working properly. I reload OSX Lion and within a day, my computer freezes up and acts as if something is wrong. When I run the verify disk, I get the Invalid Node Structure error multiple times and then the message saying the disk cannot be repaired and I need to reformat the drive. I have completed this process several times and have had no luck. I have looked at a few forums with people who have had somewhat similar problems but am still unsure. I have seen people recommend programs like Disk Warrior to repair issues the hard disk utility cannot but I don't want to spend $100 dollars on this program if my hard disk is damaged and needs to be replaced. Any suggestions? Thank you

Make a "Genius" appointment at an Apple Store, or go to another authorized service provider.
Back up all data on the internal drive(s) before you hand over your computer to anyone. There are ways to back up a computer that isn't fully functional — ask if you need guidance.

EDI structure error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for