Editing CF8.0.1 Sandbox Settings Slows Down IIS7

Hello,
I'm running CF8.0.1 on Windows Server 2008 Standard (all
32-bit) and our web site content is located on a UNC share. When I
log into ColdFusion Administrator and perform any task under
Sandbox Security (i.e. adding a sandbox, editing properties of
existing sandboxes), our web site comes to a crawl and becomes very
unresponsive. Sometimes the behavior does not correct itself
automatically forcing me to restart the WWW and CF services on the
server.
Does anyone else experience such a behavior? I don't know if
it's isolated to Windows 2008 or CF8.0.1. Seems like this is
somewhat of a performance bug. Yes, I know I can manipulate
sandboxes via adminapi. In fact, we do that most of the time.
However, there are circumstances when I need to edit them within CF
admin.
Overall, our performance has declined a little since we moved
from ColdFusion 7.0.2 running on Windows 2003. This is somewhat
disappointing.
Erick

Sure, and like I said, it would be good to get to the bottom of the problem, but before concluding that it's necessarily about CF8, since the trusted cache helped a little, can you tell us what you see as the template cache hit ratio (per the server monitor, or Admin API). If anyone there is averse to the Server Monitor, note that you don't need to turn on any of the "start" buttons (monitoring, profiling, or memory tracking).
Just look at the "Template Cache Status" page (under the "Request Statistics" section in the Statistics tab). I wonder if it may be sub-optimal (meaning, other than 100%). Be sure to look at it after the server's been up and running and had lots of typical traffic. Let us know what you see.
As for your observation about the effect of the directory watcher with a large number of templates, I've not heard it to be a problem. When the directory watcher came out in CF 7, many had the same concern and I seem to recall assertions that it shouldn't matter how large the directories were that were being watched. Are you willing to try it? Again, it was an answer to the concern that your developers didn't like the trusted cache option. If enabling it solves this problem, even if only some, it just seems worth at least trying.
But beyond that, let us know what you see going on in the template cache. I wonder if you may have a problem related to the loading and unloading of templates (going back to the original observation about the JVM, but looking at it more from a CF internals perspective than from a JVM perspective.)
There's got to be an answer (and something unique about your setup), as I've not heard it being a general problem (that wasn't solved by the JVM update).
As always, just trying to help.

Similar Messages

Editing tips for slowing down HD (flash) clips? Trimming HD clips?

Hello all... I'm new to HD flash content and have a couple of questions about some techniques that could speed up my workflow. I'm used to 'log and capture', but just now beginning my first projects ever using 'log and transfer' of HD content from flash cards. Anyway, here's what I'm hoping I could do:
1. In the past with DV tape, I would drop an entire captured clip (usually and entire tape worth of video) into my Sequence then change the speed of that entire clip from 100% to 80% for my editing needs before cutting it up for editing. With this new log and transfer, it takes every clip between takes and makes them their own independent clip (IE- each time you stop recording on the shoot it makes what you just recorded a clip, whether it's 10 seconds or one hour long). So instead of having a hour's worth of footage with pink break point markers after doing a 'DV Start/Stop Detect' function, you get a boat load of 10 to 15 second individual clips.
Question: Is it possible to select all the clips or set something in the sequence settings to change all of the clips speed from 100% (real time) to say 80% (bit of slow motion) without having adjust each individual clip one-by-one?
2. In the past with DV tape, after slowing down my entire clip I would then go through and make cuts a second before and a second after each and every break point (or pink break point marker after doing a DV Start/Stop Detect). Maybe I've always done this the hard way, who know, so I was wondering if there's a way to select all of this HD content in my Sequence (the individual clips as described in my first question) and automatically have FCP trim a second off the start and finish of each clip (whether it's been slowed down or not)? This obviously would accomplish being able to add transitions between clips (unless there's another way to accomplish adding transitions between clips without trimming them?).
Anyway pointers would be great! I love the HD flash content, but now I'm just realizing my old techniques with DV when it comes to the basic editing isn't going to work with this HD content from flash cards, making my job take 2-3 times as long as it would in the past. So I'm hoping FCP has added these kind of 'shortcuts' much like they did with being able to apply a single transition to a selected batch of clips.
I'm up to date on all software and what not... running FCP 7.0.1.
Thanks in advance!

Thanks for the response, but I have access to the FCP user manual and have already read that. I usually only come here as a last resort. I'm hoping somebody can actually answer my two specific questions vs. directing me to a user manual that I already have. Specifically the two questions I asked above with a simple set of instructions on how to accomplish both, it either is at all possible. The user manual did not provide those answers for me and if it did, I'm not understanding it.
And if what you are saying is I can import, or 'log and transfer', all of the footage from one card as one long clip then treating it like it's DV 'log and capture' footage I'd love to know the settings on how to accomplish that as well. I tried that and looked for settings and read the manual and I'm not seeing where that is possible.
I'm not a Hollywood film producer, so spoon feeding might be necessary! I'm hoping to get 'on the fly' help and advice from others that might know what I'm trying to accomplish and do it themselves all the time vs. sitting in front of my editing stations for a week trying to figure it out on my own after reading a vague user manual.

In "edit" mode, my movie speed is fine. Once published it seems to slow down and become all jerky. Any ideas? Thanks

In "edit" mode, my movie speed is fine. Once published it seems to slow down and become all jerky. Any ideas? Thanks

I have a revision a imac g5 with the same problem with only macbreak podcast. I know leo laporte said that the podcast was done in 1080p and my computer with its built in 64 megabyte graphics card might have trouble with this podcast but your machine must have a better graphics card than mine. 1080p requires at least 128 megabytes of graphics memory built in. My machine played this podcast on quicktime fine until they came out with the update to quicktime last week or two ago. I was going to upgrade my memory until I came accross your story and your machines doing the same thing with much better specs. I think it might be the quicktime update that is causing a problem. Maybe Leo will talk about this problem since he is doing a mac show about macs.

What are the best editing softwares to create sequence shots and slow down video?, What are the best editing softwares to create sequence shots and slow down video?

What are the best editing softwares to create sequence shots and slow down video?, What are the best editing softwares to create sequence shots and slow down video?

Do you want free or do you want the best, your original post said best, now you are saying free. This is a contraction, there is no such thing as best free. There is such a thing as free and such a thing as best.
Also is your focus video or photos?????

QoS and WMM settings slow internet down when enabled

Ok, so I recently upgraded to a Linksys E3200. I am trying to get the QoS to work properly. I know that it is supposed to prioritize network traffic, so that if I have busy traffic but I am playing an online game, it should keep my gaming from stuttering while slowing other traffic down. It's a great idea in theory.
The problem is that every time I enable QoS everything slows down dramatically. I had a 200MB download that was going to take 5hrs with QoS enabled, that took 10min with QoS disabled. And with QoS enabled I can't even watch a youtube video without it pausing to buffer every 10 seconds. And that was the only PC/device using the network at the time. Again turning off the QoS WMM option solved the problem. I have noticed this problem with multiple routers and brands and usually just disable QoS as soon as I set up a router, however I heard that I won't get the full benefit of 300Mbps without QoS enabled. Does anyone know if that is true?
I don't have any special Voice over IP needs, or video streaming etc. and I rarely am using multiple network devices at the same time. Is there really any reason I should enable QoS?
Also I never really play with the settings for QoS, I just figure that since it comes enabled by default it should work for the average consumer. Does anyone know if changing the settings will help?
Thanks for your help
Solved!
Go to Solution.

So leave it off since it's not working for you. FWIW I have never found it to be of any benefit. The router works fine without it.

Heavy Retouch Editing Really Slows Down Aperture!

I've been editing a few images in Aperture 3.0.1 that have require a significant amount of Retouch editing. Once I've reached about 70-80 Retouch edit brush strokes, Aperture starts to bog down. If I go over 100 Retouch brush strokes, Aperture REALLY starts to slow down, particularly if I try to export a file to be edited in Photoshop or NIK plugins. In fact, exporting is DRAMATICALLY slowed down, even if just exporting a 800x800 JPG. If I hit 150+ Retouch brush strokes, the Export Version function in Aperture becomes all but unusable. It can take 20-30 minutes to actually export the version! And that's just for a single image.
Once Aperture has caught up with itself, I can go and export a lightly edited image and it will happen in mere seconds. Go back to that heavily Retouched image, and export takes forever!
I sure hope the next release of Aperture resolves this issue! As best I can tell, it is directly related to RETOUCH (both Repair and Clone) and not so much the other Adjustments.
BTW, I have already shared my experience with the Aperture Team via Aperture Feedback.
Mark

I've seen this slowdown as well.
I think that, to some extent, that this is an issue that will exist with the type of application that Aperture is. It is dynamically applying your edits and rendering a final image to your eye, and if you have 150 retouches Aperture has to do a LOT of work. I mean, really, the math and calculations required are extreme. Maybe there's a magic bullet for this in how Aperture renders the output, but I don't know from the non-destructive nature whether this is possible. It could just be that I can't think of an easy way.

Adobe slowed down after running fine on a Mac Book Pro Photoshop settings have been reset

adobe slowed down after running fine on a Mac Book Pro.   Adobe Settings have been Reset

Hello Gener7,
     I did try everything on the FAQ page (all steps) I also did them a few more times with "Adobe help" walking me through 2 more times. I just don't get it, I have been on with Adobe on some days up to 5 hours at a time for over a month now. I think it must be something with the installation disc but they say no, no, switchboard is just not working on my OS X 10.9.4. I even took the computer into the apple store here and had them look it over, reinstall everything and they say it's the Adobe software.
     Thank you very much for your help, it's nice to know someone is reading this :-) I do work around this by saving the files and reopening them in the next program I need but everyone in class is always waiting on me, (it sucks) and I just think it should work. Hope you have a good day and I will put an update on here if this is ever figured out.
Thanks one more time :-)

Aperture slows down on edited files

Hi folks, i run Aperture 2.1.2 on a 13" MacBook 2,4 GHz with 4 GB of RAM.
I noticed a loss of performance on both referenced and managed files as they get edited, especially when added of sharpen and enhance adjustments: the more adjustments they get the more Aperture slows down, especially annoying is scrolling through a 100% zoomed photo, with the movement delayed by 2/3 seconds...
There's actually a difference between referenced and managed files, as managed ones respond a bit better, but still not as an original one.
P.S. all masters are on the internal drive.
Thanks for any suggestion...

cwog is correct about the overhead for displaying edited master images, but I disagree with his suggestion to export to view images. I suggest you use "Quick Preview" to display photos with minimal delay (use "P" as shortcut to turn on and off). You need to make sure you generate a preview automatically and set the size and quality under "Preferences --> Preview." Previews do not require the calculations for display as does the edited master image. Display time is much quicker.
Dave

Downloading Aperture has slowed down photo editing on my iMac. Should I delete iPhoto?

Downloading Aperture has slowed down photo editing on my iMac. Should I delete iPhoto?

So it was only the initial preprocessing after an import of a complete library. If your system drive is nearly full, you should expect performance problems. Try to free at least 20% of your drive.
I would try to keep your iPhoto Application - it is only 1.1 GB and you may need it later; but you can safely delete the iPhoto Library once you are sure, you imported it successfully. iPhoto can do some things Aperture cannot - e.g. greeting cards, calendars. And it is always nice to have a second application for testing purposes, if something should go wrong.
But make a backup copy of the iPhoto Library, just in case. Sometimes you will notice years later that a single image not imported correctly, and then you will be glad you still have a backup of the original iPhoto library.
Regards
Léonie

Editing: slows down drastically

Recently I am experiencing a problem that I did not have before. In Develop after I have made tens (or maybe hundreds) small brush corrections all of a sudden everything slows down dramatically. Feels like an overload, though I have a powerful desktop with a lot of free memory. LR5, Windows 8.

This is a known problem in Lightroom. Lots of brushing causes Lightroom to slow down. You would be better off doing the brushing in Photoshop or Photoshop Elements.

Is there a way to slow down the playback of video in Captivate 5?

I just made several recordings (FMR) and would like to slow them down for the viewer. The video was actually of someone else's software demo that moved way too fast. On the Captivate skin there is "2x" to move the video twice as fast, but no "1/2x". Is there another way to slow down the video?
Thank you!

No. Not there. Honest.
When I go to Edit + Preferences, I see a menu on the left.
General Settings:
Show Welcome Screen (checked)
Generate Project Backup (unchecked)
Default Locations (I set this to my output folder)
Project Cache (I set this to my C:\ drive)
Comments At: (blank)
Grid Size: 16
Spelling Preferences
Confirmation Messages
Defaults:
Background Color: white
Object Defaults:
Select: Text Caption (or highligh box, or image, or smart shape)
Display For: Specific Time 3 secs
Default Style: Default Caption Style
Restore Selected Button
Restore All Button'
General
Autosize buttons
Autozize Captions
Calculate Caption Timing
Recording:
Settings:
Generate Captions in: English
Audio Options:
Narration
Actions in Real Time
Camera Sounds
Hide:
Recording Window
Task Icon
System Tray Icon
Others: Move New Windows Inside recording Area
Smoothen movements for:
Drag and Drop Actions
Mouse Wheel Actions
Video Demo Settings button:Video Demo Recording
Show mouse in video demo mode
Working folder (mapped to my C:\ drive)
Keys
To stop recording: End
For Automatic panning: F4
For Manual Panning: F3
To stop panning: F7
To snap recording window to mouse: F11
To toggle mouse capture in video mode: F12
restore Defaults button
Project
Information
Author
Company
E-mail:
Website:
Copyright:
Project Name:
Description:
Publish Settings:
Include Audio (checked)
Publish Audio as Mono (checked)
I don't see anything in the whole menu that says anything about fps. What am I missing? Thanks!

PB slow down on windows 7 and above?

So i have a PB classic application that is on 12.5 running on windows 7. What looks like is happening is we have seen a general across the board slow down in all processes vs when it was running on XP.
It looks like the application is doing a lot of I/O to a few different registry settings:
located in
HKCU\control panel\international\
I don't have any place in the code that is doing this. So i am guessing that PB is doing it?
It looks like for some reason the I/O is getting interrupted every few seconds in windows 7 vs what it was doing in XP we think that is creating a slow down.
Does anyone know why this registry setting is being read? Or how to stop it?
Maybe if anyone knows why windows 7 and windows XP run the same PB process with the same data at two different speeds?

If your Windows 7 is x64 edition you have to consider that your application it's 10-15% slower than in 32bit environment. This overhead it's due to the operative system that emulate 32 bit application in 64bit environment.
I've find that compile in W2003 32 bit it's faster than W7 64bit with a better hardware...
Bye
Giorgio

LR 2.5 slows down after upgrading to Snow Leopard

This is my first post, so first of all I'd like to say hello to everybody here and apologize for my poor english
My computer is an iMAC with an Intel Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM, 500GB HD and a graphic card NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS with 512 MB VRAM.
The LR database is contains, up to now, about 5000 photos most of them in NEF format (my camera is a Nikon D300)
In the last month I noticed that the performance slowed down consistently as thumbnails refresh started taking a long time as well as editing photos and the overall LR2 (executing at 64bits) working.
I started monitoring the system, but despite the low LR2 performances I still had a lot of free RAM and the cores weren't really working a lot.
I can't say this for sure, but I could bet that the performance problems began with the upgrade to Snow Leopard.
Can anybody help me to solve this issue?
Thanks a lot in advance
Roberto

Ian Lyons wrote:
Lightroom performance should not have deteriorated as a result of upgrading to Snow Leopard. Things that you should check are:
1. that you are indeed running Lightroom in 64-bit mode (open System info under Help menu and check that Application Architecture shows x64)
2. that you have all of your previews rendered to at least Standard-size
3. that you have at least 20% free hard disk space
You should also run the Catalog Optimisation option in Catalog Settings
1. Yes, LR2 was running in 64 bit mode before upgrading to Snow Leopard, then (don't know why) gets back to 32 just after the upgrade and I manually set it to 64 bit (checked in the application and on the process monitoring while running)
2. I have the preview rendered 1:1 in the folder I'm working on (done again tonight)
3. I have 55% free HD space
4. I run a Catalog Optimization many times, The last one was tonight
In other words I've checked and tried all these things many times. I've red on the internet that it might be a geforce 8800 issue, but I've found only windows references. Don't forget that neither RAM nor CPU are stressed when LR2 is working and all other applications run normally

Why does Photoshop keep slowing down?

I've been using Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 for two years now, and for some reason it seems to have the problem of slowing down after using it for a while, so if I'm working on a project I have to keep closing it and reopening it to get it fast again. It's weird because it doesn't seem to matter how much stuff is on the canvas, it's just how much I've drawn and hit undo and erased or did anything, After like 5 minutes of straight work it just gets too slow for me to work in, like when I switch tools or change the color it takes a couple seconds to respond. So literally every couple minutes I have to restart Photoshop and open the same file.
What's really odd is that sometimes Photoshop will work perfectly fine and stay lightning fast for hours. Like, for the last couple of months it's been 100% fine, but since a few days ago it started to have this "slowing down" issue again. Every couple months it seems to decide to be perfectly fine or just really annoying. I didn't change anything in my computer.
It can't be my computers specs or my settings in Photoshop, but I will tell you all of that anyway.
OS - Windows 7 64-bit
CPU - Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz
RAM - 12GB DDR3 @ 1333MHz

There is no malware scanner running, in fact I have tried closing out all other applications and unnecessary processes to help improve performance. No luck.
Also, my post actually wasn't quite finished, but my internet shut off on me last night and I guess that just automatically posted whatever I had done before then. What's even better is that the forums won't allow me to edit it. What great features!
Anyway, here's the FULL spec sheet of my computer...
OS - Windows 7 64-bit
CPU - Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz
RAM - 12GB DDR3 @ 1333MHz
GPU - NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 1GB
Storage - 1x 128GB SSD (OS installed on), 1x 750GB HDD, 1x 160GB HDD
I have the 64-bit version of Photoshop CS5.1 Extended, installed on the SSD. Here's the settings I have in the preferences:
Memory Usage - 100%
Scratch Disks - All 3, SSD 1st, 750GB HDD 2nd, 160GB HDD 3rd
History States - 100
Cache Levels - 8
Cache Tile Size - 1028K
I have fiddled with these settings and restarted Photoshop countless times. In the end it's the same exact result: Photoshop slows down after a few minutes of work and I have to restart it. I have about 50GB free on the SSD, 150GB free on the 750GB, and about 140GB free on the 160GB.
I don't understand why it gets so slow even when my RAM usage only makes it up to about 45%. Why doesn't it just utilize ALL of the memory like I told it to?
I've tried setting cache to 1, 2, and 4, same result. Cache tile size to all the different settings, same result. History states to an extremely low level like 10, same result. I just don't understand why Photoshop is doing this, especially because it decides to speed up on its own every couple of months...

Is there any way to slow down playback?

i'm trying to note down times of changes in the music for an animation i'm doing but am new to soundbooth - is there any way of simply slowing down the music file i have to note these down easier?
Thanks.

No. Not there. Honest.
When I go to Edit + Preferences, I see a menu on the left.
General Settings:
Show Welcome Screen (checked)
Generate Project Backup (unchecked)
Default Locations (I set this to my output folder)
Project Cache (I set this to my C:\ drive)
Comments At: (blank)
Grid Size: 16
Spelling Preferences
Confirmation Messages
Defaults:
Background Color: white
Object Defaults:
Select: Text Caption (or highligh box, or image, or smart shape)
Display For: Specific Time 3 secs
Default Style: Default Caption Style
Restore Selected Button
Restore All Button'
General
Autosize buttons
Autozize Captions
Calculate Caption Timing
Recording:
Settings:
Generate Captions in: English
Audio Options:
Narration
Actions in Real Time
Camera Sounds
Hide:
Recording Window
Task Icon
System Tray Icon
Others: Move New Windows Inside recording Area
Smoothen movements for:
Drag and Drop Actions
Mouse Wheel Actions
Video Demo Settings button:Video Demo Recording
Show mouse in video demo mode
Working folder (mapped to my C:\ drive)
Keys
To stop recording: End
For Automatic panning: F4
For Manual Panning: F3
To stop panning: F7
To snap recording window to mouse: F11
To toggle mouse capture in video mode: F12
restore Defaults button
Project
Information
Author
Company
E-mail:
Website:
Copyright:
Project Name:
Description:
Publish Settings:
Include Audio (checked)
Publish Audio as Mono (checked)
I don't see anything in the whole menu that says anything about fps. What am I missing? Thanks!

Editing CF8.0.1 Sandbox Settings Slows Down IIS7

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for