EDQA - Reassignment of Order Confirmations

Hi
I would like to understand the practical application of the option - 're-assignment of order confirmation' functionality in EDQA process in GATP ?
As per definition it is ----
"During this process the event-driven quantity assignment (EDQA) executes a reassignment of order confirmations (ROC) in order, for example, to assign confirmed quantities from items with a low priority to items with a high priority"
If that is the case then where does orders with 'high' priority which are not confirmed in the first place (i.e. at the time of sales order creation) come into picture in this process ? Other way round, what is the purpose of processing only the confirmed orders together leaving unconfirmed orders (may be with high priority) aside ?
So in which business case this option of ROC is applicable ?
Also, does ROC update the re-assigned confirmations back in ECC Sales Orders and when ?
Regards,
YR

Hi Babu,
In /SAPAPO/EDQA_OS (EDQA simulation) the message is ....Process Is Not Active (status display)
In transaction SWETYPV, linkage in active
Also in transaction /SAPAPO/EDQA_EC I checked that the linkage is active.
What am I missing in this entire process ?
YR

Similar Messages

Open Orders (Confirmed and Un-Confirmed)

Hello BW Gurus,
I am looking for Standard BCT that can give me True Open Order "quantities" and "Amounts". The extractor 2LIS_11_V_SCL seems to give open order qty for "Confirmed" Schedules only. I am looking to get the "Net Open Orders" based on "Planned Goods Issue Date".
Any ideas on how to achieve this?
Thanks in advance.
Srini

Hi Lily,
But these extractors comprises of all orders thus, it means open orders,confirmed and not confirmed, delivered and not delivered, and orders that are already invoiced.
In my case, we need to have an open orders report meaning confirmed and not confirmed and where invoiced orders, delivered, and etc should not be included at all.
Any idea?
Thanks
Sheila

Email Sales Order Confirmation to "Created By" -

Hi Experts
I have a requirement where we need to email the Order confirmation output to the person who has created the sales order.
So lets say i am creating a sales order and my user id is 9999. (SY-UNAME).
Now as we have implemented HR module and our PERNR and user name are same.
So in other words my PERNR will also be 9999 and email is maintained in HR record and well as user record.
How can i achieve this functionality and Email order confirmation printout to "Created By".
We dont want to send order confirmation to SP or SH but just created by.
Thanks in advance.

HI Shiva,
I did exactly as you said but it send the email to the email ID maintained in Ship-to-party customer.
I think "Recipient" field is just used for cover page (Incase you are printing cover page), i dont think SAP uses it for sending the form output.
I think SAP sends output based on the partner function, so if i specify SH, SAP will send it to SH.
I tried using "Created By" partner type too and all email setting are maintained for the creator and printer is properly setup but it doesn't allow me to use this partner function.
I tried using both "$1" and "§§" but both of them doesn't work.
I have also tried using Employee responsible partner type "ER" but even that doesn't work.
Will appreciate if you can provide a solution for this.
Thanks in advance.

Sales order confirmation to the customer through email

Hi
I have configured output type z101 for sales document.Here I selected transmission medium 5 for 'External Send' . After that I completed output determination procedure as same steps and testing purpose I opened VA02 and goto Extras> ouput>Header>Edit>
here I entered ouput type ,medium 5(External Send),partner,language.
My issue is
Whenever I created(saved) the sales order then immediately order confirmation goes to the customer emailid. customer email maintained in customer master(xd01).
Please inform the what are the required settings using SCOT Transaction. This is the urgent need.
Regards,
Ravi

Please have a look at the note 455140.
Also look at the following weblog.
/people/thomas.jung3/blog/2004/09/08/sending-e-mail-from-abap--version-610-and-higher--bcs-interface
Message was edited by: Vinod C

Credit Block and Order Confirmation

I have a requirement where the client would like to send out some sort of an 'Order Acknowledgement' as soon as the order is saved if the order goes on Credit Hold. The system is set up to generate an order confirmation when there are no credit credit blocks. Standard SAP would not generate a BA00 output on save since the sales order is incomplete. Once the credit hold is removed and the order is saved the system will automatically generate that output (since the order will be complete) but till such time as the credit hold is not removed how can I generate an output to be sent to the customer just to indicate that their order has been received?
Suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
Create a new Output Type (Copy of BA00) and assign the same in your Output Procedure in NACE Transaction. For this new Output Type do not maintain any requirement or maintain a new requirement (can be created in VOFM) as per your logic and assign the same for your new Output Type. You may also check the Requiremnt 9 and 11 if that is of your any use.
Regards
Amitesh Anand

Report showing list of order confirmations and open/close reservations?

Hi
Can we have any standard report having list of order confirmations and open/close reservations in SAP PM ?
Regards
Pooja

Hi Pooja,
Try IW12, Display Document flow, if you are looking for a combined report of Order confirmations and Material status.There are various other reports related to order confirmations and Material status seperately. For material status you can use IWBK.
Better place to post PM questions is in Enterprise Asset management Forum.
Warm regards,
Srinivas Potluri

Order Confirmation - Generate IDoc even if the order is credit block - How?

Hi EDI Experts,
I have a simple requirement. I have no requirement set up in the output determination procedure for Order Confirmation. At this scenario, i am getting outbound 855 IDoc for all the orders except, the orders with Credit block on it.
The client wants to send out the order even if it is credit blocked. Is there a way that i can do this?? Any suggestions ??? Your views are most welcome.
Thanks and Waiting for youy replies,
Creasy Matt

Hi,
I'm not sure, whether it is apt to ur requirement.
We can remove the Credit block by configuring the 'Sales Order Types'.
from the Tcode: VOV8,
Select ur order type (OR), click on the details icon
there u can find the 'Delivery block' at the Shipping tab.
thanks\
Mahesh

Credit block not allowing delivery dates on the order confirmations

Hello,
We are a full module SAP shop on ECC 6.0.
For one of our businesses, we have credit checking to take place at the time of Sales Order entry. This is causing an issue for the business because they are using Demand planning and need to have the Delivery Dates on the Order confirmations and they also want to be able to run an ATP check on the Sales Order. The credit check on sales order entry, prevents them from doing both of these things.
Does anybody know if there is a way to get the dates to show up on the order confirmations when a sales order is on credit block? Also, is it possible to run the order through ATP checking with this sales order credit block taking place?
thanks for your help!

Dear,
Ideally this question should have been posted in ERP SD forum.Please check out your credit check settings in OVAK and OVA8. Hopefully it help you.

Outbound Order Confirmation - Output control for incomplete sales orders

Hi EDI Folks,
I have a simple question. I want to send EDI 855 for only the completed sales orders.
Whenever inbound sales order is processed and if the order is incomplete. I don't want to send the order confirmation for the order at that point of time. When that order is made complete, then only i want to send the order confirmation (EDI 855).
How can we do it??
What is the output determination requirement for this??
Right now i am using requirement '02' which proposes EDI output for both complete and incomplete sales orders.
Please respond to the above quesition.
Thanks and waiting for your reply,
Creasy Matt

MxG,
For both plant and pricing condition functional config was already done. If any of these two fields are missing, the status of sales order will be incomplete.For incomplete orders also, the EDI output is being proposed.
Now just tell me, in which SAP program, do i have to put the break point?
Where exactly ??
Thanks and kind regards,
Creasy Matt

Order confirmation Print Program and Smartform

Hi,
I found a smartform for the order confirmation.'/SMB40/SDORC_A'.I have searched the forums and found the print program to be the same.But we don't have it.We're on ECC 6.0Where can we download the program from?
Thanks..
Edited by: John G on Feb 4, 2008 5:19 PM

Hi John,
He has given some FM that is generated by that form. But that FM will vary from system to system . So thats very very wrong.
Some times smartforms will not be there in our system . You have to request your superiors to place the forms in place.
Reward points if useful
Regards,
Nageswar.

In order confirmation i need invoice number and delivery number.

Dear Experts,
I need invoice number and delivery number in order confirmation.
how can i get the delivery number an invoice number.
Program name: RVADOR01
Regards
Ahmed

Hi
In the Order confirmation Only sales order details will be there
You better write a PERFORM statement in Script and in the subroutine fetch the Delivery number and Invoice number with the following links and display them in script
LIPS-VGBEL = VBAK-VBELN
LIPS-VGPOS = VBAP-POSNR
VBRP-AUBEL = VBAK-VBELN
VBRP-AUPOS = VBAP-POSNR
You can also can use the VBFA table
using Prev doc type = C (order) and Subsequent doc type = J to get the Delivery
and Sunsequent type = M for getting the Invoice Number
see the sample code for subroutine
REPORT ZMPO1 .
form get_freight tables in_par structure itcsy out_par structure itcsy.
tables: ekko,konv,t685t.
data: begin of itab occurs 0,
         ebeln like ekko-ebeln,
         knumv like ekko-knumv,
       end of itab.
data: begin of itab1 occurs 0,
         knumv like konv-knumv,
         kposn like konv-kposn,
         kschl like konv-kschl,
         kbetr like konv-kbetr,
         waers like konv-waers,
         kwert like konv-kwert,
       end of itab1.
data: begin of iout occurs 0,
         kschl like konv-kschl,
         vtext like t685t-vtext,
         kbetr like konv-kbetr,
         kwert like konv-kwert,
       end of iout.
data v_po like ekko-ebeln.
read table in_par with key 'EKKO-EBELN'.
if sy-subrc = 0.
   v_po = in_par-value.
   select
     ebeln
     knumv
from ekko
into table itab
where ebeln = v_po.
if sy-subrc = 0.
    loop at itab.
      select
        knumv
        kposn
        kschl
        kbetr
        waers
        kwert
      into table itab1
      from konv
      where knumv = itab-knumv and
            kappl = 'M'.
    endloop.
    loop at itab1.
      if itab1-kposn <> 0.
        select single * from t685t
                          where kschl = itab1-kschl
                            and kappl = 'M'
                            and spras = 'EN'.
        iout-vtext = t685t-vtext.
        iout-kschl = itab1-kschl.
        iout-kbetr = itab1-kbetr.
        iout-kwert = itab1-kwert.
        append iout.
        clear iout.
      endif.
    endloop.
    sort itab1 by kposn.
    loop at iout.
      sort iout by kschl.
      if ( iout-kschl eq 'GSDC' OR
           iout-kschl eq 'GSFR' OR
           iout-kschl eq 'GSIR' ).
        at end of kschl.
          read table iout index sy-tabix.
          sum.
         write:/ iout-kschl,iout-vtext,iout-kwert.
      out_par-name = 'A1'.
      out_par-value = iout-vtext.
      append out_par.
      out_par-name = 'A2'.
      out_par-value = iout-kwert.
      append out_par.
          endat.
        endif.
      endloop.
    endif.
endif.
endform.
IN THE FORM I AM WRITING THIS CODE.
/:DEFINE &A1& = ' '
/:DEFINE &A2& = ' '
/:PERFORM GET_FREIGHT IN PROGRAM ZMFORM_PO1
/:USING &EKKO-EBELN&
/:CHANGING &A1&
/:CHANGING &A2&
/:ENDPERFORM
&A1&
&A2&
This Code is to be written in the PO form under ADDRESS window.
/:DEFINE &A1& = ' '
/:DEFINE &A2& = ' '
/:DEFINE &A3& = ' '
/:DEFINE &A4& = ' '
/:DEFINE &A5& = ' '
/:DEFINE &A6& = ' '
/:PERFORM GET_VENDOR IN PROGRAM ZMFORM_PO
/:USING &EKKO-EBELN&
/:CHANGING &A1&
/:CHANGING &A2&
/:CHANGING &A3&
/:CHANGING &A4&
/:CHANGING &A5&
/:CHANGING &A6&
/:ENDPERFORM
&A1&
&A2&
&A3&
&A4&
&A5&
&A6&
Regards
Anji

WHile playing a game why am i getting this.....To display this page, Firefox must send information that will repeat any action (such as a search or order confirmation) that was performed earlier. [Resend][Cancel]......and what can i do to get it to quit?

I am playing a facebook game called Kingdom of Camelot. This come up when I refresh the game. To my knowledge no information is sent. I need it to stop interfering with my page when i refresh . I have deleted/uninstalled my extensions and plug ins and i am still getting the message.

Perhaps someone should report this to MarketWatch. There are ways for web developers to work around this issue (GET after POST, for example).
This is a longstanding issue. Examples:
[https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/668932 how do i stop this-To display this page, Firefox must send information that will repeat any action (such as a search or order confirmation) that was performed earlier.?]
[https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/780884 To display this page, Firefox must send information that will repeat any action (such as a search or order confirmation) that was performed earlier]
In past discussions about this message, I have never seen an easy solution. Arguably it should be made a user preference: those who prefer to be warned about the risk that they will double-submit a transaction or instruction on a poorly designed site can have their warning, and those who prefer to take their chances can take their chances. Not sure whether that is on anyone's "to do" list.
Separate issue: I wasn't aware of any difference between 3.6.12 and 3.6.13, but both are riddled with security vulnerabilities so it's hard to recommend using either of them at this point.

COGI error generated while collective order confirmation

hi ALL, this is the real task for all PP GURUS.
the issue is related with collective order confirmation.
client is using customised program ZPP_CONF to confirm the collective order which is based on the sap spro program CORUPROC.this include automatic goods receipt,backflush & actual cost update .as user use zpp_conf for confirmation all this actions happened in backgruond.
now after using ZPP_CONF . the confirmation is not happening .instead of that it is going in COGI where they are getting a error massage which is as follows
"You have no authorization for this transaction with movement type 101u201D
this error continues for 10-15 minutes after doing refresh it goes. & confirmation happens.
this is not happening for all orders but for 8 out of 10.
users have proper authorisations.
they have enough stocks in st. locn.
they are loosing lot of time becuse of this.
HOW CAN I RECTIFY THIS ERROR GURUS?
when i search i found this is written in the CORUPROC documentation
Incl. incorrect goods movement: Not only preselected but also incorrect goods movements that are usually processed with transaction COGI are selected and processed.
VENKADESH

Hi,
The Program CORUPROC only can adjust the Errors in Goods movements. It can not handle the Table Locks..
The Program CORUAFWP, can taek care of table locks also, apart from the Errors in Goods Movements.
Refer below thread for similar type of problem..
COGI errors
Hope this helps..
Regards,
Siva

Reg:Bapi for mass creation of production order/confirmation

Dear Experts,
I wanted to know with the following BAPI is it possible to create Multiple production orders for different semifinshed Materials along with material availability check and other functions similar to CO01 transaction.
I knew there are standard transactions for mass confirmation for production orders. But i need a confirmation on this BAPI . As i am planning to go-ahed with ,mass creation of production order creation / Order confirmation in single custom transaction.Need back flush activity even supported.
BAPI_PRODORD_CREATE to create the orders.
BAPI_PRODORD_RELEASE to release the orders.
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_GET_TT_PROP to get the default data for the confirmation.
BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT to ost the confirmation of production order.
Along with this BAPI do i need to commit any other BAPI to carry out back flush for components.
Need your suggestions to take it further.
Regards,
Daya.

Dear SAP Daya
If the issue has been solved, please close this thread.
You have already mentioned that the issue has been resolved, thefore, you should not ask for help on another thread before closing this one, as it looks like you are trying to force people to answer your threads.
Users are always trying to answer as many threads as possible on good will we don't need this kind of "incentive".
Please read carefully the The SCN Rules of Engagement, especially point 8:
Be responsive. If an SCN member has answered your question, please mark the answer as "helpful” or “correct”. Mark the discussion as “answered,” so that other members can find the answers more easily
Also, I checked your old threads and I could observe that there is only one closed. Please review your old threads and close those already solved.
BR
Caetano

PPPI PI sheet to trigger HUM goods receipt and PI order confirmation

Hi gurus,
We're running into a problem when setting up our PI sheets.
We're using Handling Unit Management for our finished products and would like to use the PI sheet to post both the goods receipt of handling units and the order confirmation. For now let's assume all activities and ingredients are backflushed.
For the HUM section we've created a function module that combines transactions COWBPACK and COWBHUWE. When called by itself it works like a dream.
For the order confirnation we've successfully used standard SAP message category PI13, but also only when called by itself.
The problem is when we combine them:
When combining the Z function module to contain both COCI_CONFIRM_ORDER (from the PI13 message) and our ZHUM function modules, it appears that the COCI_CONFIRM_ORDER blocks the process order so the COWBHUWE part of our function module cannot be executed. This has something to do with the way SAP handles the "commit" in the function module.
Now, I noticed it's possible to include more than one message category in customizing for the PI sheet category (when configuring through the wizard). The idea is then to process the messages with a background job, filtering through the message category so we do the HUM part immediately and the confirmation only at the end of the shift so they don't block each other.
However, when I do this still only one message category is created after processing the PI sheet.
Do you know how to create messages with multiple message categories from the same PI sheet? Or if that's not the way, is there a better way to set up this process?
Sorry for the long text, just wanted to be precise. Any help is, as usual, greatly appreciated.
Kind regards,
Elt

Hi
1. What is quantity of the waste material you get as by product? Do not you wan it to be handled as scrap? What is the %age of scrap you have defined in the BOM for the material? You wll have some data regarding this. Or else how do you arrive at decission that after subcontract processes the waste you are paying him, Is it umpsum basis or material quantity basis. The best way is to have a Subcontract PO, but for that even though you do not weigh the watse quanity you must be having so historical data for the waste quantity generated and the conversion of the sane to other SFG , definitely you can arrive that on a pro_rata basis. Have a Code for the waste mateial. Release Subcontract PO for SFG which is what you get back, and issue the components( waste) to subcontractor.
Please remember your PO intially will be for Provisional quantity if you are unable to reach a fixed quantity. Amend the PO before GR as per the actual quanity for which you wish to pay the vendor.
For the waste quanity stock updation you use 262(w/o refe to Prd order) after the FG is confirmed.
Material price updation happens cirrectly in this process.
2. You can pay the vendor as you wish by by this process but what about the price updation for the ordered material SFG. When you can receive by product in separate Txn againt FG then why can not you follow the proces no. 1?
3. I would not liketo suggest 3 rd option as that becomes much comlicated for a simple operation.
Best Regards

EDQA - Reassignment of Order Confirmations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for