EDS too slow for web interaction!!!

We currently have a web application in operation that wasdeveloped under ASP/VB server technology. We utilized the VisualBasic Essbase API and the Essbase Local Client to access andmanipulate our application cubes. Works like a charm. Now our organization is being forced to convert our web applicationto a J2EE based web application. While testing the new code writingin Java and utilizing the Essbase Deployment services we weresurprise how slow this new infrastructure was. One of the classestraverses through a dimension and it took 22 minutes.UNACCEPTABLE!! I have EDS 6.5.3 configured with DB2 on an AIX server. Is there anybody out there who is developing web based Essbaseapplication that is using the java api's that can give me someadvise on what i can do to provide a web based essbaseapplication

What version of Essbase are you running? I'm currently working on a web application with EDS and Essbase7.1.3 (using both Block and ASO cubes) and I can't complain aboutmy performance. Have you narrowed it down to what method in theJava API is causing the majority of the delay?

Similar Messages

Why is the same wirelles connection too slow for an iphone4 when it is quite fast to an iphone5?

Why is the same wirelles connection too slow for an iphone4 when it is quite fast to an iphone5?

You really have a question for iPhone support here, so I suggest that you post in the appropriate support area:
Using iPhone
The experts over there will likely suggest that you use the Apple Troubleshooting Guide for iOS devices, so you might want to work your way through that before you post in the iPhone support area.
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1398

Firefox CONSTANTLY has a yellow bar on top of my screen nagging me to upgrade adobe flash but my processor is way too slow for that upgrade.

I am on an older computer that works just fine, but the processor is too slow for the flash upgrade, nor do I have the other system requirements. What can I do to get rid of this nagging bar? I do not mind upgrading to a lower version of flash, providing it is light on memory;but don't know how to or where to get it. I have seen some archives of older versions but they require knowledge of how to do zip files, or how to do the download as it isn't automatic. I currently have something called "shockwave flash 9.0.45.0". The names are another confusing thing. They talk about shockwave flash, adobe flash player, adobe flash; are they all the same thing?
michelle

cor-el, thanks for your input. The problem I keep having is that I can't get the system requirements for any of the flash versions except 11, the latest. I have looked on a number of sites as well as adobe. There is no point to download something that won't work with my system, and overloads my memory. My processor is a pentium 3, about 927 mhz. The service pack is 2.
Another problem I keep having is that for the older versions they keep telling me to "unzip" the file. I don't know what that means, or of course, how to do it.
Really need some help and understandable directions as am new to computers. This one works great, and I resent these companies putting me in the position of having to buy a new computer just so I can get their newest programs, which in reality are often not as good as the old ones. I cannot afford another computer.

What to do if my pc is too slow for Flash CS6? may i try (and find) older version?

Hi all
I tried the trial version of flash CS6 but my computer is too slow (less than 2 GB of RAM available) and I 'm not able to use it. i need it to make animated cartoons and I do not need to code in order to do it .. What do you recommend me, please? If I use an older version (which one? flash 8? is there a trial version on the site? ) it can work out ? i mean can i consider it valid for my works or is it a point against me for the market?
i want to be sure before buying the product ...
(is this the right place to ask? )
Thanks anyway
Adelina

First of all, check if your machine meets the system requirements for Flash CS6. If yo do, then i will recommend to cleanup your machine. Delete the temp files(Run->%temp%) and empty the Recycle bin.
This should also help.
Restart Windows in a modified mode | Windows 7, Vista - http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/restart-windows-modified-mode-windows.html
[Moved the discussion to Flash Pro Forum]

Time Capsule with ext HDD seems too slow for ethernet big file transfer

With new Snow Leopard on a Mac Mini, I have a wired Time Capsule with an external WD USB 2.0 HDD added. While moving files over 802.11N files seem to work fine, a full wired Ethernet connection seems to send the files too fast for the WD external drive to keep up. I get only the first 50Mb before the transfer gets corrupted. Isn't there a handshake that limits the file transmission to allow for the USB drive to stay ahead?
Has anyone else seen this? Is there a remedy?
Thanks
Bill H.

With new Snow Leopard on a Mac Mini, I have a wired Time Capsule with an external WD USB 2.0 HDD added. While moving files over 802.11N files seem to work fine, a full wired Ethernet connection seems to send the files too fast for the WD external drive to keep up. I get only the first 50Mb before the transfer gets corrupted. Isn't there a handshake that limits the file transmission to allow for the USB drive to stay ahead?
Has anyone else seen this? Is there a remedy?
Thanks
Bill H.

Broadband Speed too slow for BT's own services.

Hello, I have recently heard that BT Sport has the rights for MotoGP in 2014.
Brilliant, I have BT Broadband, it will be free for me.
Oh wait, the required speed is 400kbps, and my BT provided Broadband is less than half of that speed!
I assume, BT will be upgrading the equipment in my area to enable me to have the required speed to view this?
I can dream... Seriously angry about this.

Well folks, I managed to find my way into BT Sport because I'm in the same boat as Tourn46, I want to carry on watching MotoGP in 2014 (but I won't pay subscription fees to anyone).
Just checked my connection speed - excellent - 8MB.
Just watched some tennis on BT Sport 2 - YouTube quality at best. BT Sport 1 even poorer and ESPN, wouldn't connect.
Hohum. No more watching those incerdible machines being wrestled around at 200mph in HD/slow motion. I think I'll probably not bother to watch. I see I could maybe get HD by paying for an Infinit package - oops, I won't pay any more so that's out. I see the BT channels come up on my Samsung SmartTV on FreeView, but I'd need a subscription box to get those- oops, I won't pay any more so that's out too.

Saying connection too slow for shareplay,but i have really good speed

i have a really good speed ,when i start shareplay with someone it says that i have very low speed.i have like 3mbps(upload) and 7mbps(download or whatever)mabey its because of the update...please fix this or help!

SharePlay can be a bit temperamental at times. The best connections can sometimes say your speeds are too sow. While the slower connections can say the opposite. It has it's moments.
Do a Test Internet Connection in the PS4 settings. Then try it again a minute later. You'll have quite different results sometimes
If it allows you to continue, then just do so. Altough your speeds may result in some poor image quality and lag for the person your SharePlay'n with

ICal is too slow for practical use and crashes after it is opened

I am using an iMac G4 with OSX10.4.8. iCal is so slow that it has become impractical to use. Every click takes at least a minute to complete. Moving from the daily to the monthly view takes at least 3 minutes. I have discarded the plist file from the user library and it did not help. Any idea what is going on? Safari also suffers from the same slowness problem. I no longer use it. Have switched to Firefox.

I was having the same problem and it started after I upgraded to Tiger. After trying all the solutions, I discovered the problem with my iCal, which might not be the same for yours.
I was trying to sync with Entourage. I only had about 5 appointments on there, but once I deleted that calendar and unchecked the Sync to .Mac under preferences.
Now it runs SUPER fast. So it may be a problem with one of the calendars that you've created.
Good luck.
Thanks!

Service Registry too slow for runtime use ?

Hi,
I have a question regarding the intended use of the OSR for calls from EJBs to Web Services at runtime: is it true that due to performance reasons, the OSR should not be used for such lookup at runtime ?? (thus lookups should only happen as part of the partner link import at development time) ?
Or the other way around - would the following 'dynamic lookup' perform badly:
1.) the client party (EJB) contacts the OSR with a logical service identifier (e.g. 'registry key')
2.) the OSR does a lookup and returns the corresponding physical endpoint address of a WS
3.) the client party then invokes the web service on the given endpoint
Any thoughts appreciated ! Anybody using the OSR, if so, how ?

Try if disabling the automatic check for new albums will help. That worked for me:
Aperture ->Preferences -> Web
deselect: "Automatically check for newly published albums"

My 3 year old PC is a bit too slow for Flash 11.

Its dual core CPU runs at 2.20GHz. I expect a PC to last longer than 3 years! I have just re-formatted my hard drive and re-installed everying. Before doin that there was to problem with playing video clips. I am now finding that quite a few sites want to install flash. The previous version was lost in the re-format. Is it too much to ask to have a version that is not so resource hungry?

Finally got it to work! Tried installing from the archive before at least once. This time I logged on to Firefox as the administrator and disabled anit-virus software first. Looks like I cannot have tried the same combination before.
Discovering how to use "run as" helped. You do not start download as administrator, so it seems, but Firefox. Thanks for helping to focusing my efforts.

Mac Pro 8-core too slow for Multiclip editing

I have a Mac Pro 8core (pre-Nehalem), with 4 gb of memory. I'm doing some multiclip editing,and even with RT set to the lowest preview quality, my system stills blocks from time to time. I don't want to invest in a RAID-system, because I don't do multiclip editing that often. Is there an other - not expensive - way to speed up my Mac? Would adding memory - say to 6 gb - help?
I also have the impression that since I upgraded to Leopard Snow, the computer is much less stable. FCP shut down twice unexpectedly yesterday.

You don't say what format of HD you're editing but the fluidity of playing multiclip sequences is really dependent on the system's ability to provide all the streams of video in a timely manner. This means hard drive throughput is essential. A good quality sata drive in a MacPro can read somewhere around 115 MB/sec when empty. It will spool material less effectively as it fills.
Very good quality esata RAID systems can provide 5x that - which is why people utilize them. (fwiw-I've run 16 streams of 720p24 DVCProHD off of a Caldigit HDOne in a multiclip sequence without a hiccup. )
What can you do if you don't want to pay the price for the right gear for the job?
1. populate all your internal bays with fast hard drives
2. empty the drives
3. spread your captured files across all three (non system drives)
This will distribute the load as much as possible without going to a RAID setup.
Once you have all the drives empty, you could try setting up a RAID 0 set using Disk Utility and see if that works for you. One caveat - if you decide to go the internal software RAID 0 route, recognize there is no failsafe should you encounter a serious system crash. Everything on all drives that are part of the RAID set can be compromised.
Good luck,
x

Macbook Pro 2011 too slow for FCPX?

I have a MB Pro 2011 i7, 2 ghz processor and recently upgraded to 16gb ram for my video editing. im using fcpx but I didn’t see much difference when in terms of speed when I upgraded my ram from 4-16gb when I’m using this program. I was just wondering if this is because of my processor?

Ram Does not speed up any process, but it alowes you to work with bigger files 16 gb (HUGE FILES) The program itself will not run noticebly faster by upgrading the ram. The processor does all the thinking. (making things a tiny bit faster tho) Video editing is all about the processor.
That's why a processor cost 3-400$ and a 16gb ram cost about 60..
But then, you could upgrade your harddrive to a SSD! THAT my friend would certainly speed up every process in your computer, From boot time, to end time!
You can go a LOONG way with a 256gb SSD if you work with files up to 200gb, But you would have to have a external harddrive to store your files!
SSD: http://www.amazon.com/Samsung-Electronics-sata_6_0_gb-2-5-Inch-MZ-7TD250BW/dp/B0 09NHAEXE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1353334079&sr=8-1&keywords=Samsung+ssd+256
External HD: http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-Expansion-Desktop-External-STBV3000100/dp/B00834SJ U8/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&qid=1353334112&sr=8-4&keywords=external+hd
NAS: http://www.amazon.com/Iomega-35887-StorCenter-diskless-Network/dp/B007DAJWXQ/ref =sr_1_24?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1353334196&sr=1-24&keywords=NAS+4tb Then buy 4 or 6 tb harddrives and put them inside.
Also keep in mind: A i7 DESKTOP processor is about 40% faster than a i7 Laptop Processor
Hope this helped

DSL too slow for Mt Lion download

I've been trying to download Mt. Lion from the App store for 2 days now. I am only at about 800mb. I continually pause and resume. to get it to continue dlownloading It tells me I'm at ~8-9 hours. But then it gets hung up. This is the computer we run our media off of at the church I work for. We have DSL that is a joke. Is there any other way I can get Mt. Lion onto this iMac?
If I end up not being able to download it, will I be able to be reimbursed for the Mt. Lion purchase?

I have the same problem!

Scan rate too slow for I/O buses

Hello,
Could somebody please explain what the attached message means and how I can overcome it
Thanks in advance

Thank you for the answer. I apologize for not attaching the
image the first time. My hardware is cRIO 9014 with a 9104 chassis and modules
AO, DO, DI and AI and I am using LabVIEW 8.6.1. The concept is to control a
unit either by a touch panel (TPC 2106T) or by my PC. For this reason, I created
a project containing the cRIO controller, the touch panel and two
different vis (for now I leave the Touch panel out of the game, I mentioned it
just because is included in the project), one under the CRIO controller and one
on the PC. I also made a Library containing shared variables to obtain
communication between cRIO and PC (what I am planning to do in the future is to
set the RT vi as start up vi (in order to run always) and controlling the unit
either by the PCvi or by the touch panel vi. What I want to do now is running
the 2 vis (RTvi and PCvi) simultaneously. For the RTvi I used a timed loop with
the synchronized to scan engine selected in the input node. For the PC vi I use
a while loop with a time delay. When I am trying to deploy the RTvi I receive
the message sent in my previous post. The scan engine settings are: scan period
100sec and network publishing period 100ms. I hope that my explanation is clear
now. Please let me know if you need further information.
Thanks in advance

Video is too slow for audio, the file is .mp4, recorded it with my webcam using Toshiba Qosmio X75-A7170. Also sometimes audio repeats.

Hello,
For some videos when i record with my webcam on my Toshiba Qosmio X75-A7170, and then place it in Premiere Pro the video seems behind the audio.
Stats about my laptop:
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4700MQ CPU @ 2.40GHz
RAM: 16gb
System type: 64bit
Memory Speed: 1600 mhz
Hard Drive: 1000gb mechanical_hard_drive
Graphics: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
Graphics RAM: 3072mb
Hard Drive Rotational Speed: 7200 rpm
So the video is behind and occasionally for some reason the audio will repeat or even start over from what sounds were happening in the beginning.
The file that gets saved from recording with my webcam is .mp4. I don't know what else to say but please halp.
The video file plays like normal when i use windows media player.
I am using Premiere Pro CC v8.1

Here is the media info application
When i clicked on go to the website it just took me to the download page for quicktime which i had downloaded but it didnt change anything to my knowledge.
And here is the gspot codec application

EDS too slow for web interaction!!!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for