EEWB BUPA - relevance for ECC

I try to enhance BP in CRM 5.0 with EEWB. These fields should be also generated in ECC 6.0.
EEWC customizing is correctly. Enhancements for Business Transaction works fine.
When I generate the extension via wizard in CRM everything is ok, I have only a flag for BW relevance, but not for R/3.
Any idea?

Hi Andreas
You need to maintain the settings for the logical systems for ECC (and similarly for Mobile), if you want to generate fields in the connected systems. Note 649336 and following is describing what settings you need to make in order to have the boxes displayed.
Hope this helps,
Kai

Similar Messages

OSS notes relevant for FI/CO for upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0

Hello,
I need the list of the applicable OSS notes relevant for the FI/CO module for upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0
Thanks
Sid

Hi,
Please visit the following links:
http://service.sap.com/erp
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/ (Functional prespective)
http://service.sap.com/instguides --> mySAP Business Suite Applications --> mySAP ERP --> mySAP ERP 2005 --> Upgrade
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOVC/LOVC.pdf
For Functionality Differences pls refer to the below site -
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
After opening the site, please select the Source Release Version which is 4.6 b Then Select the Target Release Version which is "mySAP ERP 2005" or ECC 6.0
Select the Solution Area like Financials, Human Capital Management, Sales....
Select module like MM, PP, SD, QM.....
Click on Search
Then it displays the Release Version and the Delta Functionality. which can be downloaded to a word document if required.
and also check the release notes of ECC 6.0 in service.sap.com.
Hope this helps you.
Please assign points if it useful.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

Document is not relevant for billing

Dear All,
We are implementing ECC 6 in one of our client.
Our client manufacturer of x finished product, they want monitor the production process through Project system and deliver should be through project system,
We did the complete configuration from Production order till delivery in PS is working fine.
But when we try to post billing document from the delivery document, the system is showing the following error,
Document is not relevant for billing: LP is not relevant for F2.
Our doubt is in this process, whether excise invoice will be generated or not?
this LP is hard coded in SAP, We are unable to rectify the error,
our GO-LIVE date is 1st March
can any one help us to solve this issue?
Thanks in advance
regards
Elango

LP is not relevant for F2
What is LP ?? Is it Delivery type or Item Category ?? Nevertheless, copy control is missing in VTFL.
whether excise invoice will be generated or not?
If physical material movement is there from a manufacturing plant to outside, then definitely, you should generate an excise invoice
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Make movement type relevant for BW Purchasing Extractor

How do I make a movement type relevant for a Purchasing extractor? Specifically 2lis_02_SGR.
The SAP functional team (I am on the BW team) started using movement type 161 and 162 for goods receipts. They set up the movement type in OMJJ in ECC. But it does not flow into BW via the 2lis_02_SGR extractor.
I went into the Transaction Key for BW and added 161 and 162 and now they show up in the table - V_TMCLVBW / TMCLVBW, but they are not flagged as statistically relevant. I have tried to go to tcodes MCB0 and MCB_ but get an SAP error "
View/table V_TMCLBW can only be displayed and maintained with restrictions
" and I do not know what this means or how to get past it so I can edit the table.
I have tried resetting up the initialization tables for Purchasing, but the movement types still do not come in the extractor. I think this is because the table still does not have these movement types flagged as statistically relevant.
Thanks
Jeff

I have gotten a developers key, so I was able to make V_TMCLVBW editable via MCB_ but this still brings me back to the change view for transaction key maintenance for transfer into BW. But I still can not figure out how to make the movement types relevant for BW.

EEWB - BUPA enhancement not active in other clients.

Hello,
Created an EEWB/BUPA enhancement that worked great in Dev client but is not active in two additional clients. Found similar old questions in SDN but no solid answer - hoped worth asking again. Has anyone encountered this? Thanks in advance...
Also found SND note that says use tcode EEWC and add entries for additional clients you want the enhancement to generate in. I added two entries for 100 & 130 (looks something like below) and then clicked the Re-Generate button in the EEWB screen for the project but still no enhancement appeared in 100 or 130:
                      CUST         SYS        LOGICAL         NAME SHORT
SYSTEM       DESC    SYS ACTIVE TYP ROLE SYSTEM    RFC   SPACE NAME
EPDCLNT100 EPDCLNT100 X    X       ROOT CUS EPDCLNT100 <blank> Z   Z
EPDCLNT110 EPDCLNT110 X    X       ROOT DEV EPDCLNT110 <blank> Z   Z
EPDCLNT130 EPDCLNT130 X    X       ROOT TST EPDCLNT130 <blank> Z   Z
:END

Avineesh
    Have saved the Objects on a Transport Request ?
    Have you done the    <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/81/1d5303c023da438e792316c9d25a84/frameset.htm">Post Processing</a> ?
Thanks
<b>Allot points if this helps!</b>

Unicode Compatability is a pre requisite for ECC 6.0

Hi all,
Can any body send me any link or any document which says tht Unicode Compatability is a pre requisite for ECC 6.0. its really urgent.
Regrads,
Ruchika saini

Hi
see this
The Link will be helpful to you.
Re: Upgrade 4.6 to ECC - What are the responsibilites
regarding Unicode influence in Standard programs
Very good document:
http://www.doag.org/pub/docs/sig/sap/2004-03/Buhlinger_Maxi_Version.pdf
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/d37d1ad9-0b01-0010-ed9f-bc3222312dd8
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/589d18d9-0b01-0010-ac8a-8a22852061a2
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f8e316d9-0b01-0010-8e95-829a58c1511a
You need to use the transaction UCCHECK.
The report documentation is here
ABAP Unicode Scan Tool UCCHECK
You can use transaction UCCHECK to examine a Unicode program set for syntax errors without having to set the program attribute "Unicode checks active" for every individual program. From the list of Unicode syntax errors, you can go directly to the affected programs and remove the errors. It is also possible to automatically create transport requests and set the Unicode program attribute for a program set.
Some application-specific checks, which draw your attention to program points that are not Unicode-compatible, are also integrated.
Selection of Objects:
The program objects can be selected according to object name, object type, author (TADIR), package, and original system. For the Unicode syntax check, only object types for which an independent syntax check can be carried out are appropriate. The following object types are possibilities:
PROG Report
CLAS Class
FUGR Function groups
FUGX Function group (with customer include, customer area)
FUGS Function group (with customer include, SAP area)
LDBA Logical Database
CNTX Context
TYPE Type pool
INTF Interface
Only Examine Programs with Non-Activated Unicode Flag
By default, the system only displays program objects that have not yet set the Unicode attribute. If you want to use UCCHECK to process program objects that have already set the attribute, you can deactivate this option.
Only Objects with TADIR Entry
By default, the system only displays program objects with a TADIR entry. If you want to examine programs that don't have a TADIR entry, for example locally generated programs without a package, you can deactivate this option.
Exclude Packages $*
By default, the system does not display program objects that are in a local, non-transportable package. If you want to examine programs that are in such a package, you can deactivate this option.
Display Modified SAP Programs Also
By default, SAP programs are not checked in customer systems. If you also want to check SAP programs that were modified in a customer system (see transaction SE95), you can activate this option.
Maximum Number of Programs:
To avoid timeouts or unexpectedly long waiting times, the maximum number of program objects is preset to 50. If you want to examine more objects, you must increase the maximum number or run a SAMT scan (general program set processing). The latter also has the advantage that the data is stored persistently. Proceed as follows:
- Call transaction SAMT
- Create task with program RSUNISCAN_FINAL, subroutine SAMT_SEARCH
For further information refer to documentation for transaction SAMT.
Displaying Points that Cannot Be Analyzed Statically
If you choose this option, you get an overview of the program points, where a static check for Unicode syntax errors is not possible. This can be the case if, for example, parameters or field symbols are not typed or you are accessing a field or structure with variable length/offset. At these points the system only tests at runtime whether the code is sufficient for the stricter Unicode tests. If possible, you should assign types to the variables used, otherwise you must check runtime behavior after the Unicode attribute has been set.
To be able to differentiate between your own and foreign code (for example when using standard includes or generated includes), there is a selection option for the includes to be displayed. By default, the system excludes the standard includes of the view maintenance LSVIM* from the display, because they cause a large number of messages that are not relevant for the Unicode conversion. It is recommended that you also exclude the generated function group-specific includes of the view maintenance (usually L<function group name>F00 and L<function group name>I00) from the display.
Similarly to the process in the extended syntax check, you can hide the warning using the pseudo comment ("#EC *).
Applikation-Specific Checks
These checks indicate program points that represent a public interface but are not Unicode-compatible. Under Unicode, the corresponding interfaces change according to the referenced documentation and must be adapted appropriately.
View Maintenance
Parts of the view maintenance generated in older releases are not Unicode-compatible. The relevant parts can be regenerated with a service report.
UPLOAD/DOWNLOAD
The function modules UPLOAD, DOWNLOAD or WS_UPLOAD and WS_DOWNLOAD are obsolete and cannot run under Unicode. Refer to the documentation for these modules to find out which routines serve as replacements.
Regards
Anji

Line item not relevant for payment release

Dear Expert,
When I select payment block : 'Payment Request' in FB60. Error Message appear "Line item not relevant for payment release".
I also have set payment block in master vendor and OBB8.
Can you tell me why the error message still appear?
Kindly need your help
Thanks and Regards,
YL

Do you have any workflow variant in place?
Moreover, when you have already set the Payment block at Master level, you need not to fix it in transaction level.
Vendor itself will not get paid until unless you remove the block option
Thanks

Deliveries Showing as 'not relevant for billing' after Invoice Cancellation

Hi,
We have a plants abroad scenario, where the billing document (plants abroad invoice) had to be cancelled because of wrong profit centres. After correction of data, when we are trying to invoice these deliveries, the system shows these as 'not relevant for billing'. Any idea what could have caused this and/ or how to correct this?
Thanks in advance for the help,
Regards,
alok

HI Alok,
Could you please recheck the delivery document flow again, its only Billing document is cancelled or PGI reversal is also done or not.
As per my knowledge G/L correction is nothing to do with 'not relevant for billing' or "relevant for billing".
Try again there might be a case where delivery might have been reversed or billing document has not been cancelled or Document might have been blocked.
Regards,
Nagesh

Delivery 0080000276 is not relevant for transportation planning.

At the time of (delivery related) invoice creation, system throws a message "check the error log".
Log says:
" Error Log             0080000276 000010 Delivery 0080000276 is not relevant for transportation planning
            LongText
                Detail
                 Diagnosis
                     Copying control for billing requires that shipment costs
                     are copied from the shipment belonging to this delivery.
                     No shipment costs could be determined, because this
                     delivery is not relevant for transportation planning.
                 System Response
                     The system assumes that no shipment costs are to be billed
                     in this case.
            Technical data
                Tech. data details
                 Client                                 251
                 Group Number
                 Sales Document Number                  0080000276
                 Item Number of the SD Document         000010
                 Schedule Line Number                   0306
                 Counter in Control Tables              00
                 Message Identification                 VY
                 System Message Number                  306
                 Output Type                            I
                 Message Variable 01                    0080000276
                 Message Variable 02
                 Message Variable 03
                 Message Variable 04
                 Group Type                             F "
Please advice if anyone have any idea for this error log.

Error Log 0080000276 000010 Delivery 0080000276 is
not relevant for transportation planning
It is not necessary to assign the Transportation Planning to Delivery type. Only recently, I completed a similar configuration and running successfully for a client. The issue is because of your copy control VTFL. For more information, check note 713171.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

EXCISE GROUP H1 NOT RELEVENT FOR PLANTS IN PURCHAGE ORDER

Dear All,
While creating vendor excise invoice by Tcode: J1IEX it is throwing error AS MENTIONED BELOW,
EXCISE GROUP H1 NOT RELEVENT FOR PLANTS IN PURCHAGE ORDER
Kindly help in this matter.
Regards
AJIT K SINGH

Hi
Check the series group which your giving in J1iex.. Has it been assign to to Excise registration of Plant. And you have given us the Message number and application area. If it is a customized message then you need debug with Abaper.
Regards
Antony

INTRASTAT / EXTRA - Credit memo not relevant for declaration

Hi all,
I have this problem with INTRASTAT declaration:
Transaction VE08 mark credit memo as not relevant for declaration with this description "No association to a goods movement was found".
Do you have any solutions?

Hello,
check VE80, if you have an exclusion indicator on the item category.
If not try to run VE01 for your country and mark only credit memos. Use log type B. Check the message in the incompletion log. If your credit memos are not in the incompletion log, than run the transaction transaction VE08 you run before again. The credit memos should show up, otheriwse let me know what is the message in the incompletion log.
Check also if you need to show credit memo from legal point. From my point of view it should show only data related to deliveries.
Try and reply.
Edited by: SAPSD1000 on May 25, 2009 6:03 PM

Issue in creating Invoice when route is not relevant for shipment cost.

Dear All,
We are facing a problem while creating an Invoice. The route used in shipment in not relevant for shipment costing. Shipment type is relevant for costing. So in normal scenario if I don't remove the tick mark from "Shipment cost relanace" at shipment type and proceed with Invoicing I get error as " SHipment costing is not complete", which is correct. The scenario works well if item/s in delivery are not batch split.
But, if items in delivery are batch split and "shipment cost relevance" check is not removed from shipment type then, only batch split items get copied in invoice. Header item is deleted and invoice gets saved, which should not happen.I don't get error in this scenario.
How should I make the error in invocie work in case of batch split items also? Could anyone please let me know?
Thanks!

Dear Manmeet Mohan K,
Can you please check the copy controls in between delivery document to invoice(VTFL)
Thanks&Regards
Raghu.k

Transfer rules are not exist for ECC Quality source system in BI Dev

Hi,
I Connected BI Dev system To ECC Dev and installed the sales, purchasing,... data flow, but here i am not getting the quality data to show the reports, to get Quality data I established the connection between BI Dev and ECC QA, while installing the transfer rules for the ECC QA data sources there no transfer rules are exist(only some of them exist) in the business content, but all the update rules,... are exist, when i right on the data source say create transfer rules it is proposing App praposal.
When i select source system as ECC dev while installing the transfer rules i can see all the transfer rules, but when i select source system as ECC QA i can see only some transfer rules.
only problem with transfer rules(some of them exist), for remaining all objects are properly existing in business content for ECC QA source system.
Regards,
chandra

Hi Fayzrakhmanov
Thanks for the quick reply. We are not moving the stuff to QA. We are only connecting QA ECC system to BI Dev. We already have datasources moved to ECC QA and created source system for ECC QA in BI Dev.
The problem is I am not able to get Business Content transful rule for new source system. We I can find some but not all unlike development.
Help on this would be appreciated.
Thanks

Unit of measure conversion for CIN is not relevant for pricing

During creation of Ad item type order, when we enter the planned ad size e.g. A CO (Columns) x B IN (Inches), the system is showing a message "Unit of measure conversion for CIN is not relevant for pricing" and pricing is not determined in the Billing Data Set. However if the planned ad size is maintained as A CO (Columns) x B MM (Millimeters), there is no impact to pricing conditions.
Any light how to fix this issue?
Thanks,
Suseela. V

Dear Suseela,
You need to maintain Unit of conversion using transaction code JH51. You have to follow the path Logistics-Advertising Management-Master Data-Conditions-Order/Billing Document-UM for Pricing.
Here you can maintain combination using Booking Unit, Content Component, Design type and assign Unit of Measure to get relevant pricing into billing set conditions.
Hope it will help. Thanks!
Regards
Indra

Intercompany stock transfer - Item not relevant for billing

Hi Experts,
please can you help me in Intercompany stock transfer billing. I set up all customizing for Intercompany stock transfer, checking also with all OSS notes available.
When I try to invoice Stock Transfer Delivery (created from Stock Transfer Purchase Order) with VF01, system issues the message "F044 The item is not relevant for billing".
As per standard setting, billing relevance on Stock Transfer Delivery item category is "D".
Thank you very much
Kind Regards
Andrea

Check your copying control setting for Delv to Billing in VTFL (LF - IV)
Header:
Copying requirements - 014 - Hdr dlv.rel.IC bill.
Item:
Copying requirements - 015 - Itm dlv.rel.IC bill.
Data VBRK/VBRP - 001- Inv.split (sample)
Also, check for your I Cat that has billing indicator is active.
Thanks & Regards
JP

EEWB BUPA - relevance for ECC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for