Effects of Goods Receipt for PO with A/C assignment to Network?

Dear All,
Does anyone know what is the effect in the system after I posted a Goods Receipt for a Purchase order item with account assignment to a Network (Project Systems).
The account assignment is 'N' in the Purchase Order.
Best Regards,
Junwen

hi,
i know only assignment with "P"
-> it has an effect of the Budget and liability
(values in table rpsco)
Andreas

Similar Messages

  • Goods receipts for PO with RF solution

    Hello Experts,
    In our warehouse,we want to post goods receipts for purchase order through RF solution by scanning the PO# barcode.
    Is that possible? If possible can we ask our vendors to have the Barcodes designed for each purchase order document which support SAP RF solution?
    My users want to goods receive in automated RF process where he needs to scan barcode and receive it.Can any one explain me how we want to proceed?
    Thanks in advance

    Hey,
    This is firstly going to involve the development of a custom RF transaction to allow for such functionality to be made available on an RF Device (handheld/truck mount).
    The complexity of which depends upon whether you are then receiving into IM/ WM/ WM with Storage Unit Management or WM with Handling Unit Management.
    The barcode itself, as supplied by the Vendor on any receiving documentation, simply needs to be in a format that can be recognised by your choice of RF Scanning Device.
    Can you give us more information as to the level of Warehouse Build, as this will drive exactly how much development will be required for such a transaction?!
    thanks,
    A

  • Non valuated Goods Receipt for materials with multiple account assignments

    We have been using multiple a/c assignments for services on purchase orders for sometime with no issues.  Recently we used a multiple a/c assignment distribution for a material P/O.  this didn't work the same and the Goods Receipt was set as non valuated.
    This leaves the cost showing as a commitment and we do not get any actual costs charged at the GR point until we get and post the invoice.  This only happens with multiple account assignments, all material P/O goods receipts for single assignments get valuated.
    Were not sure why this happens, and want it treated the same.  Is there any way we can get these valuated the same way single assignment materials or multi assignment services are.
    The non valuated GR flag is getting set automatically, but we can't see where this is coming from for this scenario, so were a bit stuck.
    Any advice/direction would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Graham

    Hi Deshamol, No the materials are all valuated, as mentioned, they all work fine when used as single a/c assignment.
    Anupam, Your answer doesn't make sense to me, this is 1 line on the P/O, therefore 1 material.  It can't be both valuated and none valuated for each a/c assignment. 
    I have read in a note there there is a business function that you can apply to get this working, has anybody tried it?
    Thanks
    Graham

  • Partial goods receipt for PO with multiple line items

    Hello All,
    While doing MIGO, for a PO with multiple line items, if one line item is having error, will we be able to go ahead with goods receipt? Or entire material document is blocked for doing MIGO?
    We will be doing a development - in case if there is problem in goods receipt (checking of any parameter, and if it is missing - we will be posting error message)...is it possible to ahead with next line item and still post the material document?
    If partial goods receipt if possible for PO with multiple line items, how do we do it?
    Regards,
    RJS

    Hi
    While doing MIGO, for a PO with multiple line items, if one line item is having error, will we be able to go ahead with goods receipt? Or entire material document is blocked for doing MIGO?
    No. You cannot post the MIGO, if even one of the PO line item is having problem or giving error.
    We will be doing a development - in case if there is problem in goods receipt (checking of any parameter, and if it is missing - we will be posting error message)...is it possible to ahead with next line item and still post the material document?
    If you skip a line irem and do GR with next line item, how will you match quantity & value with the vendor Invoice at LIV ?
    If partial goods receipt if possible for PO with multiple line items, how do we do it?
    Partial goods receipt is possible for PO line items. That means, if PO has 100 qty for line item 1 then you can do GR for 50 now and 50 later depending on the vendors delivery.
    Hope this is what you mean by "Partial Goods Receipt".
    Edited by: Arun R on May 10, 2010 2:03 PM

  • Good Receipt for PO With Network

    Dear gurus,
    I have a problem with Good Receipt PO with Network. How to make so just quantity with no value in inventory when i GR that PO?. But in same plant too we can GR PO without Network. so quantity and value enter in inventory.
    Thx.

    Hi,
    When PO created for material in ME21N with Acc. *** . cat" N" or with any Acc. *** . cat and GR done, then during GR posting, it will hit respective G/L account related network or any cost object related as debited ( all cost loaded) and GR/IR clearing as credited.
    If PO created as standard PO with material (if material valuated), then during GR, it will hit Inventory account as debited ( resulting quantity & value updated) and GR/IR clearing as credited.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Unit of Measurement - MB31 Goods receipt for order

    Hi,
    we maintained production unit (MARC-FRTME) for some materials. Now the goods receipt for order with MB31 suggests this production unit (MSEG-ERFME). The customer's requirement is that MB31 suggests the quantity in base unit of measure (MARA-MEINS). The quantity should be the entered value in the confirmation of the last operation.
    I implemented BADI WORKORDER_GOODSMVT (IF_EX_WORKORDER_GOODSMVT~MANUAL_GOODS_RECEIPT) to convert the quantity from production unit to base unit of measure. The stock is increased correctly but the Purchase Order Unit of Measure (MSEG-BSTME) is in base unit and not in production unit. If the material document is displayed with MIGO the quantity ordered (Tab Quantity) is wrong. The quantity is the production quantity and the unit is the base unit.
    For example:
    MARA-MEINS:   PC
    MARC-FRTME:  XY
    1 XY <=> 12 PC
    Production order: 13 XY (=156 PC)
    MB31 with 100 PC
    MIGO: Quantity orderd: 13 PC (instead of XY)
    Does anyone have an idea how this problem can be solved?
    Thanks!
    Best regards
    Martin

    You can attend this issue by activating batch classification. Extend the classifcation view and maintain batch classification for the Unit of measurement of the material.
    Chris

  • Why decimal Places are allowed during goods issue and Goods receipt for mat

    Why decimal Places are allowed during goods issue and Goods receipt for material with unit of measure PCS.
    MY config allows consumption in decimal places.
    How to restrict this?
    Prem Nivas

    Hi,
    Please check in customizing UOM (T code-CUNI).
    In dimensions check the decimal point for the unit of measurement.
    Regards,
    Krishnendu.

  • How to post good receipt for an inbound delivery with HU in the stock?

    Hello,
    We have an inbound delivery of a purchase order with 10 Handling Units inside on.
    The HU's has been put in a storage bin (by transport order + confirmation) before a good receipt has been posted for the whole delivery.
    Due to this it's not possible to post good receipt for the inbound delivery, and the available stock quantity is in minus on zone: '902-GR Area External Rcpts' since  the handling units are already in a storage bin.
    Can anyone help me on this matter?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    my situation is:
    - a WM managed warehouse, society A;
    - a HU managed warehouse (without WM), society B;
    - a purchasing process of HU from society A towards society B.
    Society B have a scheduling agreement; when a delivery schedule appears, in society A born a sales order and a delivery. After the registration of the delivery good issue, an idoc transfer information for inbound delivery creation.
    This process is ok without WM, but with a WM managed warehouse the idoc has the following problem:
    "V51VP - item was not found - process cancelled".
    Can you help me to transfer these HU?

  • Doing a goods receipt for a customer material that is ASEQ status

    We are needing to find a way to be able to do a goods receipt for a child part in ASEQ status.  Most of our customers will send in their part after disassembling it themselves.  Since we can not receive the part our present process is to dismantle so the system status changes to ESTO and we can receive.  The problem with this is that the end user forgets to assemble the part back and we end up breaking the linkage.
    We have looked into using User Status in the equipment master and have configured that.  However the user status button, nor name shows up in the equipment master.  I have looked at the field selection in IMG and it is not hidden.  I am assuming it is being supressed by a user exit we have.
    Can anyone give me any suggestions on how we can improve the process using SAP for material that is ASEQ status and being able to create an inbound delivery so we can receive in our warehouse for this status without dismatling the unit? 
    We are on ECC

    Hello Kimberly
    You lost me while describing your current process, so  please provide more details as to how you dismantle and reinstall etc.  Also how the part goes back to the customer.
    However I can provide you  clarifications to some questions you raised..
    You see both system and user statuses in the field 'Status' itself. This is the 3rd row in the Equipment display screen under Equipment number and Description. If you see carefully you will see 2 sections, the one on left is system status and the one on right is User status. If you click on the i (info) icon, you will be taken to a screen where you see more info like status and business processes etc.
    ASEQ is a system status and it is determined by what you did ( example dismantling) and can't be changed by you (user). If you see the 'Business Processes' tab, you will also see the this won't allow assignment to a Delivery and so on. So my point is having a user status will not help you. Based on the combination of system and user statuses, some processes are permitted, some not. For example if Goods Receipts are allowed, may be you can receive without an Inbound delivery.  I am mentioning this as a thought initiator, I know you will have a Return/Repair order process including a return delivery.
    I guess you have to systematically prevent the user from  doing whatever they are doing out of turn, e.g., forgetting to reassemble (install?) and for this User statuses can help.
    Let us know your process more in detail and I am sure SAP will have a standard way to receive a child part of a big assembly. Other members will share their practices also.
    Take care.

  • Transaction BORGR: No tolerance on goods receipt for Kanban calloff

    Hello,
    we have the following situation:
    - MM scheduling agreement with tolerance of 10% for under and overdelivery, production supply "summarized JIT call" is set.
    - KANBAN cycle has 1 empty container with a summarized JIT call for replenishment, quantity 10 pieces.
    - ASN has been created with BORGR transaction, it contains: 1 line item for the material with delivery quantity 9 pieces, assigned to this line item is the JIT call with notified quantity 9 pieces as well.
    My expectation was that the JIT call can be booked with 9 pieces as it is inside the 10% tolerance defined for the scheduling agreement. In addition, I expected the KANBAN container be set to full.
    Instead, the following error message is given:
    'Post GR' carried out without success
    (Message no. BORGR215)
    Because of previous error, dispatching is not possible for ID 0180573431
    (Message no. /SPE/ID_HANDLING011)
    Inbound Delivery 0180573431 00010
    (Message no. BORGR210)
    Total of the summarized JIT calls does not match the current delivery qty
    (Message no. BORGR540)
    Changing the delivery quantity and the notified JIT quantity to 10 pieces, the goods receipt is booked correctly.
    I only found the following notes that deal with tolerances but they are outdated, as we are using DIMP release 603:
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/393421
    https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/508215
    Has anybody faced a similar problem or can help me with this?
    Thanks!

    Hello Jiaul,
    Sorry I may have mislead you.  The actual error message is "Goods Receipt for Production Order XXXX can only be made on 2010.08.25 to 2010.08.27".  These two dates are the Start Date and FInish Date for the Production Order in CO03, 
    The Basic Start Date for the current Production Order is  2010.08.25
    The Basic Finish Date for the current Production Order is 2010.08.27
    I think what it means is that you can only Post Goods Receipt for the Production Order only after the Basic Start Date of the Production Order.  Do you know where I can find the configuration for this message?
    Thanks

  • Value of inventory after Goods Issue, before Goods Receipt for open order

    Dear Experts,
    Raw materials R72 and R82 are required to produce Semifinished Product S10.
    Semifinished product S10 is required to produce Fnished product F20
    On 10th August 2011, I created and release a Process Order for material S10 copying component materials R72 and R82.. Goods issue for component materials R72 and R82 were done for this process order using tcode MIGO (mvt type 261).
    It  takes four to five days to properly blend components R72 and R82 to obtain S10.
    It means Goods Receipt for this process order will be done on 14th or 15th August when this blending has been completed.
    Management suddenly issues a directive that stock take should be carried out in the plant on the 12th August 2011, and my process order is still open and cannot be closed ( or goods receipt cannot be done)  because blending is yet to be completed.
    Please how do I take care of this scenario/situation since Goods Issue has been done already?
    How will the Accountants see or get the correct value of inventory?

    When I run WIP Calculation for my Process Order, what will be the effect ? I mean what accouts are updated by WIP Calculation within a period (not across a perion or  at period end)?
    GI values issued to the Process order will come into WIP GL .( Since your client want to know the stock take should be carried out in the plant on the 12th August 2011- we are doing WIP calculation)
    > After  this WIP Calculation is run,  and say about 2days later, Goods Receipt for this process order is to be posted, what steps am I suppose to carry out?
    After GR Made, Run a WIP calculation again for the order so that The WIP from the GL account will get reduced ,now WIP= (GI value + confirmation ) -(GR Value),
    Check in DEV system before doing in PRD,
    On Month end, do the variance calculation and do the settlement

  • Error while doing Goods receipt for process order. Error code: "BS027"

    I am getting error while doing GR for a day whereas previous day(s) GR is already done and also 2 days post that day are also done successfully.
    Error :  ""Goods receipt for prodn. order" is not allowed (ORD XX-CEMTSAL) " (XX = First two characters of plant code)
    Error code: BS027.
    Thanks to all in advance.

    Hello,
    This issue would occur when you want to post a confirmation for a production order. The error message is generated if you wanted to post a backflush for a component and if this component was assigned to a sales order stock. The sales order itself was assigned to a work breakdown structure element which should be debited with the actual costs. However, the business transaction 'Confirm' is not permitted for a work breakdown structure.
    Please look into SAP Note 62367 and 64370
    Hope the information is helpful
    regards

  • Make goods receipt for the items w/difference after the proof of delivery

    Hello experts,
    I do like to know how finish the process of proof of delivery, when I does have items with differences over the quantities that arrived to my client. For example, one sales order for 20 units. I did the delivery note, and posted the goods issue. Then I did the Proof of Delivery, confirming 19 units and the deviation reasons, saving the document. Then I made my billing document for 19 units of material.
    The deviation reasons was a damage material, my questions is: How does make goods receipt for the items with difference over the quantities after the confirming of proof of delivery?
    Thanks in advance
    Edited by: Johnattan Company on Sep 8, 2009 3:45 PM
    Edited by: Johnattan Company on Sep 8, 2009 3:59 PM

    Hello Chetan,
    Thinking in the process, I have found a solution to do it. If the differences was caused by unknowing reasons, like stolen or whatever reasons and the material will not enter again in the warehouse, we donu2019t need to make any process.
    But if the causes was a broken material, a lapsed date expired or unknowing others reasons as a consequence the material will enter again in the warehouse; I have customized a returns order, and a returns item with the option not relevant for billing to conclude the process.
    Thanks for your help.

  • Problem in picking base value from PO while doing goods receipt for multiple POs

    Hi,
    Our user is trying to post goods receipt for two purchase orders which have same vendor. After the materials of two POs are allocated in the item detail screen and checked the item ok, system throwing error as "Please check the base value of the item is zero" ( also excise tab does not appear for last three line items). This error does not occur when we are trying to do the goods receipt separately for each POs. Only when we do goods receipt for both the POs together, we are facing this error.
    Please let us know what could be the reason. Is there an issue with standard CIN? Any notes to be applied? Please help!

    Refer these notes for the issue.
    1528009 - MAA: incorrect distribution of goods receipt
    quantities
    and
    1677707 - Determining the valuation type for stock transport orders
    at the time of GI
    For Excise tab not appearing, you have to check J1ID for "Material-ChapterId combination" and "Cenvat Determination".
    Regards
    Binoy

  • Post Goods Receipt for Inbound Delivery using WHSCON IDoc

    Dear All
    Currently I am working on a big project dealing with EDI connections to our logistics partner for the Export business. The entire message flow between Lindt and our partner should be via EDI. Our SAP release is (still) 4.6c.
    We will create two kinds of despatch advice messages, one for inbound deliveries and one for outbound deliveries for customers.
    I would appreciate your support in the following problem that I am facing with the inbound delivery scenario:
    We create stock transport orders (purchase orders, POs) for the goods intended to be delivered into the plant at our partner
    We create a delivery (type NL = replenishment delivery) for this POs
    As soon as we post the goods issue we send the despatch advice (as EANCOM D96A DESADV message) to our partner.
    At this point the delivery is basically completed, i.e. packing status (PS) and goods movement status (GM / GS) are equal to 'C' (= completed).
    Our logistics partner uses the same EDI message to send us the goods receipts data, e.g.:
    We dispatched 50 units of a product => QTY:50:12
    The partner received indeed 50 units => QVR:50:66
    Please note that we do not use the QVR segment for the quantity difference (between despatched and received quantity) but it contains the received units. This way we avoid negative values in the QVR segment.
    When the logistics partner sends back the DESADV message containing the received quantities (QVR segment) we want to make
    the goods receipts for the products in the original stock transport order and
    upate the message flow in the delivery
    My idea was to transform the incoming DESADV message into a WHSCON.DELVRY03 IDoc based on the documentation in: [Delivery Interface|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40/helpdata/en/e2/654b15a9f411d184ec0000e81ddea0/content.htm]
    In the delivery header control E1EDL18 I used QUALF = 'PGI' (Post goods issue).
    I prepared an inbound WHSCON IDoc according to the documentation mentioned below. I managed to get some feedback from the Idoc processing implying that the system tried to do the goods receipt in the PO but failed.
    To make a long story short here are my questions:
    Can an inbound WHSCON IDoc used for doing both the goods receipt in the PO and the update of the message flow in the delivery?
    Does anybody have an example on how to fill the WHSCON IDoc?
    Or is my approach a cul-de-sac ?
    Kind Regards
       Uwe
    PS: A related question can be found here: Goods Receipt in PO AND Message Flow Update in Inb. Delivery using WMMBXY

    Hi Uwe,
    Can an inbound WHSCON IDoc used for doing both the goods receipt in the PO and the update of the message flow in the delivery?
    The binary answer would be no. You should use WMMBXY or MBGMCR instead.
    But if we are doing goods receipt against Inbound delivery then answer is YES with additionally E1EDL18-QUALF = 'PIC' populated. But please remember no partial receipt is possible against Inbound Delivery.
    We should populate E1EDL20-VBELN with our Inbound delivery number and line item info should go to E1EDL24.
    I have done a similar interface recently where we are doing receipt against Inbound delivery. But our case was a bit complex because we had to support against Inbound delivery. So we had to go for a custom solution on top of IDOC_INPUT_DELVRY.
    Hope this helps. Let me know if you have more questions.
    Regards,
    Rudra

Maybe you are looking for

  • Difference B/w abstract & interface

    Anyone tell me what is Difference B/w abstract & interface. because i m very confiuse. plz tell me

  • MessageChoice does not return correct value

    Hi I am problem with MessgeChoiceBean's improver beharior For the first time it retunrs blank and subsequently In one page if I select Yes, it returns No. In another page it does not return any thing for the first two selections. And I reciev flip va

  • Related to issues

    1.Is there any Tcode for monitoring process chains if not what how to monitor ? Thanks in advance 2.In my company I am using process chain for loading transaction data to sales order cube, after triggering the start process execution of infopackage i

  • Timemachine does not backup all my files

    Hello, I have a macbook pro 13 inch early 2011. I use an external hard drive for timemachine backup. A couple of months ago my hard drive broke and I restored my time machine backup. Unfortunately a lot of files were missing, mainly random songs from

  • MIRO Calculate Tax button should be automatically checked.

    Hi All, While doing MIRO (Invoice), calculate Tax checkbox needs to be automatically checked. Could any one let me know where to configure these settings so that "Calculate Tax" will be automatically checked. Is this setting will be on a User level ?