Effects of Split Valuation on CK11N / CK24 / ML

Hi Gurus,
We are using material ledger.
Now we plan to use split valuation as well.
Is there any kind of effect of split valuation on CO-PC, especially on calculation (CK11N), price update (CK24), material-ledger?
Thank you!
Tad

If you use split valuation, then for releasing the cost at valuation type level, you will need to activate mixed costing configuration. You will also need to maintain procurement alternatives (t code KK91N), specifying the sourec for each valuation type and also the mixing ratio i.e. weightage for each alternative (t code CK94).
There is no change in CK11 or CK40N)
Regards
Rakesh Pawaskar

Similar Messages

CK11n with split valuation

hi,
Here in MM split valuation is being used for raw materials. Mean local and imported.
When I run the cost estimate system does not picking the price of raw material. I check raw material have two prices according to valuation type.
What setting needs for cost estimate, please advise in detail.
sapian

Dear,
If you use split valuation, then for releasing the cost at valuation type level, you will need to activate mixed costing configuration. You will also need to maintain procurement alternatives specifying the sourec for each valuation type and also the mixing ratio i.e. weightage for each alternative (t code CK94).
Please refer this link,
[Mixed Costing|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/34/f4af26be4411d1898f0000e8214595/frameset.htm]
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Split valuation issue for material batch

Dear Expert,
I am using batch specific valuation for semi finished material using split valuation category is "X". When creation of production order user assign component batch to header material in goods receipt tab of production order. Every time system create valuation type for header material with proper value of header material. But in some cases it only create batch for header material & not valuation type is created since inventory of header material show value 1 (one) rupee which is maintained in material master. I have done analysis but no conclusion is made because all configuration & material master found correct.
Can anybody face such situation & have solution for it.
Thanks in advance!!
Regards,
Shyam Ghotale

Hi Shyam,
What is your Price indicator for semi finished good?
If it is S-Standard Price. Everytime GR is done Posting will be made based on Standard Price updated in Material master(thro Product Costing CK11n & CK24). So what is purpose of using batch based Split valuation if Invenotry(MAterial+Valuation type) is valued at same Price.
Assume that you are using Moving avg Price for Semi-finished Goods
If it is V-Moving avg Price -SAP already reconizes that there would be huge difference in valuation in production order , because of timing difference of Goods issue later than Goods receipt. This is already recomended to 'Not ' Use.
Batch based split valuation is for Purchased part... It should not be used for Manufactured parts/Semi finished goods.
It just provides addtional valuation , if Different purchased order has different price.
There is no value in activating this functionality even for procured parts, if you are not going to use this information further on where each of these differently valuated batch are used.
First ,identify what business requirement you are trying to address.
Best R,
Jatin

Split Valuation- Net Price Problem in Po

Dear All,
       The Split Valuation confiigured for Material as
       Val Type(A)- Ex Procurement
       Val Type(B)- Internal House Production.
assigned Valuation Category(C) with A & B and with Plant.
In Material Master Accounting view enter all the reqired inputs
First i Created PR and its ok and go for PO, it asking " net Price" and entered the Net Price, again it showing error msg " net price greater than 0.
Note: for this material PIR, Source List require or not.
       so what i done a mistake? and can any one explain it.
Thanks

net price always remains exclusive freight/delivery cost.
the freight/delivery cost gets added on the net price
so going by logic the calculation which ur system is showing is perfect.
"Re PO: As per you, only net value will be displayed in PO and effective price will not display . why?"
this is becoz it shows the price of that particular material per unit.
regards,
indranil

How to estimate two products price in split Valuation

hello, everyone,
Our factory have Two equipments , one is a new equipment A , the other is an old equipment B,
they all produce the prodcut W , but the old equipment B consume electricity ,warm water and Raw material is much more than the new equipment A. So the cost price of product W is different when they were produced by equipment B and equipment A.
the Finacial Department and Sales Department want to know different cost price of product W via different equipments in the end of every month. Now we use two different material NO to deal with it(actually it is one product ) ,but this method take a lot trouble to stock, because one product quantities were seperated by different material NO in Storage location.
According to this requirement, we activate the split valation, but the customizing of split valuation just supply one field for val.type in-house prod, at the same time , the t-code CK11N screen has not the field vauation type. if we don't estimate the material cost price by CK11N, when we create sales billing ,the system can not post COPA document and give a error that is :“Valuation with material cost estimate: error with product "1180119998"
   may you have a good method to deal with this type of business or you ever met this kind of business . may you share it , I appreciate you for your help !!!
    Davis
    Best&Regard.

Hi
You can change the same through MR21
regards
Sanil

Split Valuation by Origin

Hi MM Gurus,
I am new to Split valuation, i have configured Spit Valuation for Import and created two valuation types as Italy and france. i have activated for my plant. I have created a material and assigned two valuation types for the same material, with same valuation class and different Moving average price.
Here i want to know in which way it will effect my Process? What i need to check and how i have to proceed further. please guide me. what is the steps i need to do after creating a material.
Thanks in advance,

Hi,
Once you have maintained the split valuation type for the materials, you can maintain the stocks, manage the inventory and transactions as per the valuation types craeted.
1] You can also add valuation type in PO, PR to differentiate these two types of materails
2] As GR will be done against such PO, stocks will be automatcally updated as per valuation types entered.
3] While Issuing or despatching the same material, you can provide selected valuation type.
There will be seperate entries for these two valuation types for the same material since MAP, Valautaion class are different for these two valuation types.

MM42 change material, split valuation at batch level, M301, locking table

Dear All,
I'm working on ECC 6.0 retail and I have activated split valuation at batch level. Now in MBEW for this specific material I have almost 14.400 entries.
If I try to change some material data (MM42) I receive an error message M3021 A system error has occurred while locking and then Lock table overflow.
I used SM12 to see the table (while MM42 is still running) and it seems that MBEW is the problem.
What should I do? For any material modification the system has to modify every entry in MBEW? Is there any possibility to skip this?
Thank you.

Hi,
Symptom
Key word: Enqueue
FM: A system error has occurred in the block handler
Message in the syslog: lock table overflowed
Other terms
M3021 MM02 F5 288 F5288 FBRA
Reason and Prerequisites
The lock table has overflowed.
Cause 1: Dimensions of the lock table are too small
Cause 2: The update lags far behind or has shut down completely, so that the lock entries of the update requests that are not yet updated cause the lock table to overflow.
Cause 3: Poor design of the application programs. A lock is issued for each object in an application program, for example a collective run with many objects.
Solution
Determine the cause:
SM12 -> Goto -> Diagnosis (old)
SM12 -> Extras -> Diagnosis (new)
checks the effectiveness of the lock management
SM12 -> Goto -> Diagnosis in update (old)
SM12 -> Extras -> Diagnosis in update (new)
checks the effectiveness of the lock management in conjunction with updates
SM12 -> OkCode TEST -> Error handling -> Statistics (old, only in the enqueue server)
SM12 -> Extras -> Statistics (new)
shows the statistics of the lock management, including the previous maximum fill levels (peak usage) of the partial tables in the lock table
If the owner table overflows, cause 2 generally applies.
In the alert monitor (RZ20), an overrunning of the (customizable) high-water marks is detected and displayed as an alert reason.
The size of the lock table can be set with the profile parameter u201Cenque/table_size =u201C. specifies the size of the lock table in kilobytes. The setting must be made in the profile of the enqueue server ( u2026_DVEBM.. ). The change only takes effect after the restart of the enqueue server.
The default size is 500 KB in the Rel 3.1x implementation of the enqueue table. The resulting sizes for the individual tables are:
Owner table: approx 560.
Name table: approx 560.
Entry table: approx 2240.
As of Rel 4.xx the new implementation of the lock table takes effect.
It can also be activated as described in note 75144 for the 3.1I kernel. The default size is 2000 KB. The resulting sizes for the individual tables are:
Owner table: approx 5400
Name table: approx 5400
Entry table: approx 5400
Example: with the
u201Cenque/table_size =32000u2033 profile parameter, the size of the enqueue table is set to 32000 KB. The tables can then have approx 40,000 entries.
Note that the above sizes and numbers depend on various factors such as the kernel release, patch number, platform, address length (32/64-bit), and character width (Ascii/Unicode). Use the statistics display in SM12 to check the actual capacity of the lock table.
If cause 2 applies, an enlargement of the lock table only delays the overflow of the lock table, but it cannot generally be avoided.
In this case you need to eliminate the update shutdown or accelerate the throughput of the update program using more update processes. Using CCMS (operation modes, see training BC120) the category of work processes can be switched at runtime, for example an interactive work process can be converted temporarily into an update process, to temporarily increase the throughput of the update.
For cause 3, you should consider a tuning of the task function. Instead of issuing a large number of individual locks, it may be better to use generic locks (wildcard) to block a complete subarea. This will also allow you to considerably improve the performance.

Raw materials on MAP with split valuation used in standard cost estimate

We have a few raw materials which are purchased from different vendors and of different brands. We have opened split valuations for these raw materials. These raw materials are later used in manufacture of different finished goods. We use MAP for raw materials and Std. for finished goods. What configuration and processing steps will be required to run standards cost estimate and what will be standard price for a finished good considering the following example:
Material X is finished good
Raw Material A with split valuation @ USD 5 (brand aplha) & USD 10 (brand beta)
Raw Material B without split valuation @ USD 1
It is expected that we used brand aplha 60% of the time and brand beta 40% of the time and production batch size is usually 100 Kg.
Please reply
Edited by: Chris SAP on Sep 29, 2011 7:56 AM

hi chris
Hope you have configured the material A for split valuation. while calculating standard cost estimate for the material C. through ck11n, the system will pick up the header price from material master.
But here you are saying that you have chances of using the material A, 60% of brand alpha and 40% brand beta
Instead of using split valuation use mixed costing concept. create the material A with separate Ids and create two boms one with alpha and the other with beta.
create procurement alternative in CK91N and mixed ratio with Ck94 and release the mixed cost estimate
please go through this thread also
Re: Difference between Split Valuation and Mixed Costing
Krishna

Material Split Valuation : Procurement Domestic & Import

Dear CO Experts,
I m in a situation where my client has a Raw Material (RM), which is procured domestic & also imported. This RM is attached to a single FG in a BoM.
Do differentiate domestic & import procurement, they have used Split Valuation.
The reason behind such a decision is, since that RM is very sensitive and delay could not be affordable.
Clients are now requesting to have a seperate view of Standard Cost Estimate based on Slipt Valuation. We have observed that execution of Standard Cost Estimate picks only RM which is based on local currency.
Please help me to understand & few steps of missing config, how to have a dual view (based on Slipt Valuation) of Standard Cost Estimate.
Regards,
Hussein.

Hi Hussein
Two RMs are required - But its not a good option... It creates lot of probs in MRP if you have duplicate codes...
Two FGs are not required if you go for 2 RMs....
a. You can create 2 BOMs... The RM will be different in each BOM
b. Routing may be the same
c. Create 2 Prod versions i.e. BOM 1 + Routing = PV1 and BOM2 + Routing = PV2
d. Create 2 Proc Alternatives in CK91N using the Prod 2 Versions
e. Create a Mix ratio in CK94 i.e. weighing factor that you can assign to each PV
f. Calculate cost from CK11N... Costs will be calculated separately for each PV and at the end system would apply the mix ratio specified in CK94
Eg: Cost of PV1 = 100 and Cost of PV2 = 120... If mix ratio is 50:50 - Then Std cost would be 110 (100 * 0.5 + 120 * 0.5)
From my experience - I would advise you to drop your requirement and educate your client about the same... have one single raw material (you can use Split Valuatoin) and use the Average price for Std cost... While execution - The cost of consumption would be charged as per Domestic or Import... This would hence, reflect the price variance....
br, Ajay M

Can we maintain two values for one material a plant without split valuation

Hello Guru's,
We have a situation, we use MOVING AVERAGE PRICE in accounting view 1. Without split valuation.
The actual issue is, we receive, damaged material from a customer with a "0" value, and we send the material as it is, to a vendor with a "0" value.
The vendor, sends us back the repaired material with a value, say "10" (and this keeps changing).
Is it possible, to have Non Valuated Stock and Valuated Stock within the same Plant, for Material "A".
And it shouldn't affect the MAP. Also, we don't want to have Split Valuation.
Please help.
Kashi

if i am getting your scenrio correctly then i will suggets u to maintian the material master with moving avreage price control indicator then
case1> gr from customer at o rs
use the tcode mb1c and movement type 511
as it is evaluated at MAP hence only material document genrated no accounting document
well tried to realize your scenerio but it is not possible to do that
as MAP is going to get effected as a result of valuated good recipet
u need to go for separate material code then transfer good from non valuated to valuated one using tcode mb1b and movement type 309 or use split valuation

How do I update standard cost for split valuation material?

We are using split valuation on our maintenance material. Maintenance material is held in an inventory account separate from our production material. We have materials that are set up with a Parent material as variable, and child materials which are NEW or REFURBISHED or CORE.
The Child materials are set as standard cost. Some of the standards are old. Unlike our production materials, which have their cost standards on the Costing 2 tab of the material master, split valuation child parts have their costing on the Accounting 1 tab.
I attempted to update a cost standard by loading a future price manually in the material master. I was able to load a future price, but could not get it to release in CK24.
I have been unsuccessful in finding a process or procedure that tells me how to update a child standard once is already exists. There was one blog that said that the standards could only be released using CK24N if the quantity is zero. I attemped to update costs on part with zero quantity on hand. This was also unsuccessful.
I am looking for a process- ie 1) load a future cost using tcode XYZ, 2) Mark and release cost using tcode XYZ, 3) validate changed inventory value using tcode XYZ.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Hi Govind
If your valuation variant reads MAP as the strategy sequence - Then average MAP will be taken... i.e. the MAP in the parent accounting view of the material will be taken
However, if your strategy sequence is intended to look for info records, then follow the link given in the earlier reply
Regards
Ajay M

High volume of batches with Split valuation - impact on system performance

Hi!
I have a client that is intending to load a new material type from their legacy system which will be automatically batch managed with split valuation. So, Valuation category will be 'x' and the valuation type will also be the batch number as automatically created on GR.
The concern of the client is the impact on system performance. Having up to 80,000 batches per material master record (so, 80,000 valuation types will be mainatined with a unique price in the Accounting 1 tab of the MMR) and overall around 1 million batches a year. I'm not aware of any system performance issues around this myself but there seems to be anecdotal evidence that SAP has advised against using this functionality with high volumes of batches.
Could you please let me know of any potential problems I might encounter, having 1 million batches with split valuation may cause? Logically, this would increase to tens of millions of batches over time until archived off via SARA.
Many thanks!
Anthony

I currently have about 1.5 million batches with split valuation in my system (but it is not the X split), and we archive yearly.
having many batches for one material ( lets say 1000) causes dramatic performace issues during automatic batch determination.
it took about 5 minutes until a batch was returned into a delivery. if the user then wants a different batch and has to carry out batch determination again, then he just works for 10 to 15 minutes on one delivery.
This is mainly caused by the storage location segment of the batches. if one batch gets movedd within a plant thru 3 different locations, then the batch has 3 records in table MCHB. But SAP has a report to reorganize the MCHB table that have zero stock.
The X split has more effect, it is not only the batch table that makes issues in this case. With the x-split SAP adds an MBEW record (material master valuation view) for each new batch.
However, if the design is made to get a certain functionality (here valution at batch level), then you have to get a proper hardware in place that can give you the performance that is needed.

We need to manage raw materials by vendors(makers).(about Split valuation)

Hi all.
We just started a project to install SAP system.
Our client need to valuate their raw materials by vendors(makers).
For example : raw01(3Cm*3Cm steel hot coil) is sold by VendorA, VendorB, and VendorC.
Raw01(from VendorA, B, and C) are same materials but the price is largely different by vendors(makers),
just as raw01(VendorA)'s price is 1,000/EA,
       ,     raw01(VendorB)'s price is 1,500/EA
     ,and raw01(VendorC)'s price is 2,000/EA
So our clients , expecially finance dept and purchasing dept, want to manage them seperately.
Finally we consider about split valuation(batch valuation with valuation type).
But Our concern is as below:
1. System Performance : The number of GR is 1,000 / per day.
                                        It means that the batchs(1000EA) will be created everyday.
2. In case of raw mat, we want split valution.
   All material type use Batch : Our material types are raw mat, half finished good, finished good.
                                                 They will be managed Batch number.
                                                 But we just want to manage split valution in case of raw material.
Now we consider all cases which can be occured.
Please give us good advice.
Best.
Mahnkwi.

hi chris
Hope you have configured the material A for split valuation. while calculating standard cost estimate for the material C. through ck11n, the system will pick up the header price from material master.
But here you are saying that you have chances of using the material A, 60% of brand alpha and 40% brand beta
Instead of using split valuation use mixed costing concept. create the material A with separate Ids and create two boms one with alpha and the other with beta.
create procurement alternative in CK91N and mixed ratio with Ck94 and release the mixed cost estimate
please go through this thread also
Re: Difference between Split Valuation and Mixed Costing
Krishna

Estimate Cost on Split Valuation Materials

Dear Experts,
We have split valuation on MM for almost 2 years. But we have since then the following problem:
We have this split valuations:
For finished products (FERT) we have 01 and 02 for valuation types
For semi-finished products (HALB) we have 03 and 04 for valuation type
The problem is that when we try to calculate the estimated cost with CK11N and CK40N, the cost only is assigned to the material itself but not to the valuation types. I don't know if I made myself clear, this is an example:
*Material * ----- root ------ valuation type 1 ----- valuation type 2
Cost -------- X -------------- no ------------- no
With this we are force to use Tx. MR21 to asign cost.
Please anyone help.
Javier Sandoval Vera
Ecuador
Edited by: Javier Sandoval on Apr 1, 2009 10:56 PM
Edited by: Javier Sandoval on Apr 1, 2009 10:57 PM

HI,
When you run the cost estimate, only the base material price will get updated.. you cannot expect the price of valuation types to get updated..
because the valuation type prices will be changing as per the wish of the plant....
karthick

STOs with split valuation by batches

I have split valuation by batches activated.
The system forces me enter a batch number(valuation type) when i am creating the STO.
It does not make sense, as the batch is really known at the time of shipping.
wE have reviewed all the relevant oss notes , nothing seems to work.
i appreciate if anyone has valuable inputs on this.
best regards

Hello,
Note 66953 explains that during the creating of stock transport orders,
you must enter the receiving 'valuation type' (not the batch number).
The valuation type in a stock transport order is always mandatory in accordance with the following: (w/o OMF4 configuration of either ME21 or ME27 or ME21N)
The first step after posting the stock transfer PO is the goods issue.
In this step, the user is only able to type in the issuing valuation type. But the system also needs the receiving valuation type to post the value correctly.
This information can only be taken from the PO
item. So the valuation type in stock transfer orders is mandatory.
As you have pointed out other valuation types are proposed eventhough they are deactivated. This is normal.
In contrast, the first step after posting normal POs is NOT the goods issue, but the goods receipt. So the receiving valuation type can be typed in and you need not specify the valuation type in the PO item.
For normal POs the valuation type field 'required' can be configured using the field selection reference keys in transaction OMF4 (e.g. ME21 NBF), thereby making the field a required entry. However, a similar
customizing for field reference keys ME27, UBF is not effective.
Note 216904 describes the correction only for standard PO´s (w/o item category 'U').
Also, your description 2 describes the standard system
when creating PO's with split batch valuation and note 66953 addresses this.
I hope this information helped you!
Regards
David Merino

Effects of Split Valuation on CK11N / CK24 / ML

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for