Ehancement -payslip.

Hi,
i am trying to rplace text for p0002-famst key with text from table t502t using conversion 96(added by me in table V_T514C foe country 99 anf form cedt ) . i made implici ehancemevt in program RPCEDSZ9 and add the following code , but still it is not converted into text . plz help me in solving this problem .
ENHANCEMENT 1 ZTEXT1.    "active version
$FOUND = TRUE.
data: lw_ftext type t502t-ftext.
CASE FLD_INFO-CONV.
    WHEN '96'.
      SELECT SINGLE FTEXT FROM T502T INTO LW_FTEXT where FAMST = P0002-FAMST.
                FLD_INFO-value = LW_FTEXT .
endcase

Hi
We have edited editin feature. Does editin feature support only the existing option for the feature? We have appended the feature so that we can put conditions on infotype & then subtype. but this condition is not getting read.
Please help me in this regard.
Regards
Minal

Similar Messages

P Tax is not getting displayed in the payslip

Hi All,
The P Tax is not getting displayed in payslip. I have checked the customization again but no use. In PA30 (IT0588) i have 'checked' the box for P Tax eligibility and have also assigned /3P3 in the form IN01 in window 2 (for deductions).
Please help.
warm Regards,
Shruti B.

Hi,
Thank you All.
Regards,
Shruti B.

Wrong display of No. of days worked in Payslip for mid-month joining

Dear Experts,
We use PE51, form editor for payslip for indian payrol. Our issue is when an employee joins mid of the month or say 4th of any month, still in payslip it shows no. of working days as 30/31 days instead of actual days worked. But pay results are correctly being calculated on factoring basis.
Please let me know how to resolve it, we use PCR ZNP1 for factoring which is written as follows
ZNP1 Partial factors for India - /801(CD), /802(WD), /803(WH),/804(Nom)
      /801 Partial period factor 1
        RTE=TKSOLL Set
        RTE-TKAU** Subtraction
        RTE*KGENAU Multiplication
        RTE/TKDIVI Division
        ADDWT *    OT   Output table
      /802 Partial period factor 2
        RTE=TASOLL Set
        RTE-TAAU** Subtraction
        RTE*KGENAU Multiplication
        RTE/TADIVI Division
        ADDWT *    OT   Output table
      /803 Partial period factor 3
        RTE=TSSOLL Set
        RTE-TSAU** Subtraction
        RTE*KGENAU Multiplication
        RTE/TSDIVI Division
        ADDWT *    OT   Output table
      /804 Partial period factor 4
      /805 Partial period factor 5
      /806 Partial period factor 6
      /807 Partial period factor 7
Please guide, if i need to modify it for getting correct working days display in payslip
Regards
Tan

in that case the Requirement is to display no of working days of employee in a month
Here working days means
Total Calendar Days - Unpaid days - Paid days = working days ( please check the said one again since i have inculded the paid days and unpaid days if u want u can remove paid days)
so in order to fetch this
we need Calendar days that is TKSOLL
Unpaid days   check the technical wage types /845 Paid days /846 ( you can have custom wage types too)
Copy a wage type from standrad overtime wage type that will be 1555
The PCR is as follows
NUM=TKSOLL (calendar Days)
NUM-E /846      Paid days
NUM-E /845
ADDWT 15555
Use ACTIO function and insert it any where in Sub Schema XT00

Multiple Payslips in PDF Document

Hi All,
We have a requirement of getting multiple Payslips in a single PDF document.
Right now, we use the Java Webdynpro application to display payslips in ESS using a custom HR Form / Smartform.
This allows us to display a single payslip in PDF format.
Our requirement is to input a date range, and if that date range has 12 salary statements(assuming each statement is one page), we need a PDF document created with 12 pages in it.
Upon analysis, I found the class CL_HRXSS_REM used to generate the standard payslips.
Any guidance, in terms of how I can use this to meet our requirement would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Saleem

you can control from here but having multiple payslips ? you mean different smartforms for each scenario??
You can check these features
1. HRFOR - This feature decides whether to use HRFORMS or CEDT forms
(configured in PE51) for the payslip. If HRFORMS, the name of HRFORM has
to be mentioned here. If PE51 needs to be used then $CEDT$ should be
specified.
2. EDTIN - This should hold the value of the variant to be executed in
the CEDT program (payslip program). The variant should be proper with
the with the correct CEDT (payslip) form name and other parameters.
3. EDPDF - The name of the smartform (standard smartform
HR_ESS_PAYSLIP_TO_PDF or customer specific form) used to show the output
in the ESS.
Or you can check in method L_PRODUCE_FORM
Default implementation of BADI XSS_REM_INTERFACE is stored in
class CL_DEF_IM_XSS_REM_INTERFACE. If you go to SE24, enter this
class and then select method PROVIDE_FILTERED_RGDIR, you will be able to
see the default implementation regarding the 3 days I mentioned before:
method IF_EX_XSS_REM_INTERFACE~PROVIDE_FILTERED_RGDIR .
DATA: newest_date LIKE sy-datum.
ex_filtered_rgdir] = im_in_rgdir[.
CLEAR ex_message.
remove all in-periods where not:
a) paydt is at the past
b) paydt is in the near future (3 days)
newest_date = sy-datum + 3.
DELETE ex_filtered_rgdir WHERE paydt GE newest_date.
Please, when implementing this BADI do not forget to mantain the other
methods as explained in note 901850.

IT0185 Field value is not getting displayed on the Payslip

Hi Friends,
I have the similar issue of this post as Unable to View the IT0185 Subtype National Ins# (ICNUM) in Payslip.
Little confused with PE51_CheckTab entries and other stuff.
Could anybody please suggest as to how to resolve this?
thanks in advance.

I assume that you are referring to a brand new field on the second step that was not on the form of the first step. If this is the case, then you should put the field in a hidden block of the first steps form. Default values and Auto-population from shells/single record BPs only occur of the create step, even if they are not used on that step. As long as you put them on the create step (even in a hidden block) they should initialize.

PF No. Not getting displayed in payslip

Dear All,
The PF No. is not getting displayed in the payslip. In pe51 transaction for the form created under Single fields i can see the table maintained as p0587as Table and Table field as EEPFM. The master data is maintained for this employees in IT 0587 and the dates are also maintained correctly but this specific data of PF number is not reflecting in cluster tables. PC00_m40_clstr - > EPF table.
In EPF table i can see the trust ID but the PF number is not getting displayed..
Could anyone of you suggest how to proceed further..
Regards,
Srikanth

Hi Rohith,
Thanks for your response. We are currently on ECC 604 and SP Level 45.
As mentioned earlier here the issue is with PF number. As far as Pan # is concerned we don't have any issue.
The PF number is not getting read in the payroll log itself however it is reading Trust ID field. The data is maintained in IT 0587 for all employees and in PE51 both table and table field are mapped correctly for Provident Fund number Single field. Could anyone suggest and let us know why the PF number is not getting fetched in the payroll log..
Regards,
Srikanth

Issue in payslip calculation.

Hi Experts,
I am facing problem in payslip
new employees who joined in the middle of this months
1) DOJ 5.9.2011 in the slip only Basic calculation showing correctly.
2. DOJ 15.9.2011 in the slip only Basic Calculation showing correctly
In previous month payslip of new employees there is no issue in the calculation. but in this month salary slip except Basic all monthly component i e. HRA, Special .Allwn, Tran,Edu, CAR Allwn are showing wrong calculation .
Note: few days ago we I maintain PCR ZNP1 from INP1, for present days in payslip. is this problem come due to this?
Please guide me..
Regards,
Raj

If you do a Payroll Simulation with the "Display Log" box checked, you will then be able to look at the partial period parameters calculated for that employee (function PARTT).
If you use t-code pe04, enter Payroll Operation AMT, and look at it's documentation > for 6 places operands > for 2nd Variant: Table Fields > for type T tables, you will find the link to the Partial Period Parameters, of which the following is only the first few lines:
Partial Period Parameter for the Partial Period (Operand Prefix T)
Object
    Additional operation documentation
Explanation
    1. Planned working time in accordance with employee's personal work
        schedule with exact reference to basic pay period
        KSOLL : Planned working time measured in calendar days
        ASOLL : Planned working time measured in work days
        SSOLL : Planned working time measured in working hours
    2. Total working time in payroll period in line with employee's work
        schedule with exact reference to basic pay period
        KDIVI : Total working time measured in calendar days
        ADIVI : Total working time measured in working days
... and there are many threads on this site and on the web relating to this issue.

Error in payslip

Hi all,
I am facing with an error in payslip.
For certain group of employees(trainees),In the payslip no of loss of pay days are displayed wrong.
But for all other employees,it is showing correctly.
In the absence report, the values are showing correctly.
How can I solve it.

Hi SP,
What is the no of loss of pay dates component in the pay slip composed of? (what wage types?)
When you determine the wage types it comprises, go and check the PC_PAYRESULT transaction to see whether these values were calculated correctly in the payroll.
Probably the problem is not in the pay slip but in the payroll results instead..
Dilek

How to show no. of actual working days in Payslip in case of +ve time mgt

Dear Experts,
We have a requirement of showing no. of actual working days in payslip, which should be Calendar Days-(Paid+Unpaid absence). I created an w/t 1WRD for actual working days. Our paid absence w/t is 2006 and unpaid absence is 2005 copied from /845 and /846 respectively, both the absences are included in absence valuation table and working fine in that respect. But issue is i wrote a small PCR for calculating actual working days like below:
ZWRD
     NUM=TKSOLL Set
     NUM-E 2005
     NUM-E 2006
    ADDWTE1WRD
But still its fetching full working days i.e. calendar days 30 or 31 not deducting paid or unpaid absence for a month.
Pls help, what else should i do.
Regards
Tan

Sorry, i am unable to paste RT, but its exactly as below
01, April, 2011
1WRD Working days     30.00
2006 Paid Absence       2.00
02, May, 2011
1WRD Working days     31.00
2005 Unpaid Absence   1.00
regards
Tan

Payslip display issue for retro periods of a wage type

Hi,
we have an issue with payslip display for the rate field of an wage type.
we are genaearting the amount of a wage type 2000 using T511K constant. and we have changed the Rate of this constant in the mid of pay period.
if we have split in WPBP then we are getting payslip display for old and new rate. which is fine.
however if we don't have WPBP split for retro periods then payslip is clubbing the old and new rates hence the diaplay is wrong.
ex: wrong dispaly for retro periods (08/2009 one record with RTE as 6 and for 09,2009 another record with RTE as 6)
wage type          rate             number      amonut
2000                   12                2                12      (rate should be 6 however it is diaplaying 12 as taking rate of 08 & 09,2009         periods where it is comg as 6+6=12 which is wrong)
right dispaly should be
wage type          rate             number      amonut
2000                    6                   2                12      (rate should be 6, i.e 6*2=12)
Thanks
Gayathri

Hi Gayatri,
First check the values in payroll log or RT table. If its displaying correctly in RT table and if its problem with Payslip, then ask the abaper to debug the program.
Also check the WPBP table in RT table, because as you told that if there are any changes in the mid of the month, then the amount may split.
And if you have written any PCR for this, then check the PCR, whether its overwriting with any values.
Just check the above points.
Thanks & Regards
Bharathi

Wrong payslip in case of seperation

Dear all ,
While running payroll for seperated employees the system is displaying wron information in payslip , like the amounts , tax etc. is coming right but the no. of paid days is wrong.
What could be the possible error.
Regards,
neha

Hi Friends,
I am also facing the same problem, In my scenario,
Iif the employee is a regular, it show the full days in salary slip(ie.30/31), but when employee seprated from the orgnisation on suppose 15th of that month it is showing 13 days in salary slip. why this difference is coming.( salary is calculating correct).
Can you please give the solution.
Regards
Raj

Neg Arrears are seen in payslip

Hi Gurus,
March payroll is run and posted also.In april transfer action is performed for a particular emp in the mid of march.So retro is triggered in april and we are getting 3 payslips for march.one is blank with no values.Other is from 01.03.2009 to 15.03.2009 with the amounts of basic,hra,conveyance and other allowances.One more payslip from 16.03.2009 to 31.03.2009 with the remaining amount.This is due to split in the month of march.
Now the problem is in April payslip the amount calculated for the 16th march to 31st march is populated as negative arrear and is getting deducted from the April earnings.As a result even the emp is present completely for the month of March and April amt got deducted in April and his total earnings are reduced.
Please provide me the solution how to stop this neg arrears to be populated.
Thanks
Sarada

Hi Revathi,
Once again thanks for the reply.
Can u give me your email so that i can send the screen shots of the pay slips of march and april.
So i need to explain the client that when there is master data change and they have to change the 0003IT and do live run of the current payroll.
Before explaining them i have to be clear.
If there is any master data change,the system triggers retro.The same happened here also.There are two payslips for march.
But in April payslip why the same amount paid for second part of march has been deducted from april earnings.
Please explain me clearly if possible.
Regards,
Sharada

Error in Retroactive wages in payslip and Payroll register

Dear Consultants,
One of my client facing error while retroactive wage display in payslip and as well as Payroll register, when the employee is having any retro arrears that time the total arrears are coming as "Stat.net subs.adjustment" but client want the break up of this total arrear amount.
sample payslip :
Then I have created a new Payroll remuneration statement through PC00_M40_CEDT as below
After doing this changes the in the payslip I am able to see the retro amount break up in pay slip, but the retro amount is not calculated to /101 gross amount, and PF employee contribution is coming 3 times. can any one let me now what are the exact requirement for this issue ?
When I checked in RT table after running with the new paylip varient there are only two PF employee contribytions are there 1 is /3F1 calculating for current month earnings, and /ZF5 calculating for retro amount. there is no other employee PF deductions are there then form where this 3rd PF is coming in payslip? please do needful.
Thanks
Naresh

Dear Praneeth,
Do I need to create new wage types for arrears amount? and am giving the currently using PCRs
IN42, ZN43 (IN43), IN44. kindly help me in changing of this PCRs.
PCR (currently using in Payroll schema):
IN42:
PCR ZN43:
PCR IN44:
This are the PCRs IN42, ZN43 (IN43), IN44 using in production payroll Schema.
please do needful.
Thanks Regards,
Naresh

GB Payroll - Pension display in Payslip

Hi every one at SDN family
i have issue on pension contribution display in payslip -
i have configure the pension type and maintaied IT 0071 info type - but in payslip the contribution is not showing
what might be the problem.. Please help me on this
Thanks in advans
Regards
KSS

Did you check the specification of the Evaluation Class 02 for the wagetype under concern (used for pension type) in table V_512W_D? This controls the printing on the rem statement.

ER Contribution should not Deduct from EE SAL and not Display in Payslip.

Hi Experts,
I have Pension ER contribution Wage type:
1. That should not deduct from Employee SAL
2. Should not display in Payslip.
3. Amount store in RT.
What changes i should do in V_T512W_D table
Appreciate your early response.
Regards
Raj

Hi,
We are maintaining the EE & ER contribution.
EE is working fine with all the validation & deducting from employee every month.
When we are handling ER contribution that amount is getting deducted from EE sal.
So we want to restrict ER contribution Deducting from employee sal and not to display in Payslip.
Figuring out how can we handle this thru Processing, Cumulating or Evaluation class.
Kindly advise
Regards
Raj

Ehancement -payslip.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for