EIGRP load balancing when using HSRP on LAN

Hi
I have a question about my topology. I have two routers with EIGRP on both of them connected through 2 ISPs to other site. On those routers i have HSRP runing. Now my question is: HSRP is standby/active protocol so when one router act as active will it send data to other site only through one ISP??? will load balancing work on WAN side? will routers use both ISPs or just one- the one which is active in HSRP when sending data???

Hi sotiris_pafitis, may be I didn't understand what you mean but if the idea is to configure one static on each router (pointing it's ISP) and redistribute it in EGRIP, I disagree: is useless because the other router will prefer the static route due to its better administrative distance. Using EIGRP unequal load balancing is useless because it balanced EIGRP path with different metric, not different Administrative distance. Isn't it ?
If you want to use static route simply configure two static route on each router: one though WAN interface and the other through the LAN.
For example:
R1#conf t
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.13.3
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.12.2
The result is:
R1#sh ip route 0.0.0.0
Routing entry for 0.0.0.0/0, supernet
Known via "static", distance 1, metric 0, candidate default path
Redistributing via eigrp 100
Advertised by eigrp 100
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 192.168.13.3
      Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
    192.168.12.2
      Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
In any case I think static router is not a good choice: in case of a fault on ISP 1, WAN interface can remain up producing a routing blackhole. If possible it's better to have a dynamic routing protocol between router and ISP, receving the default route and changing delay on interf to have the same metric for both the path
Bye,
enrico

Similar Messages

Cluster/load balance weblogic using L4 switch like Alteon

Can I install weblogic as a standalone server on 2 or more server and
          cluster/load balance weblogic using a hardware balancer like Alteon Layer4
          switch (of course I will use a centralised storage to maintain a single copy
          of data which will eliminate syncronizing problem among servers)?
          BTW, Alteon can support persistent binding. The reason to use a Layer 4
          switch is that it is very fast, and this will make the application server
          layer transparent to client, the client can think this is a single server
          (it don't need to know whether there are 5 weblogic servers or 20 weblogic
          servers behind switch), and hardware are more reliable, sacalable and fast.
          I am not sure whether the normal weblogic clustered servers need to
          share/exchange info on the running memory, if it does, this approach will
          fail.


So My understanding is:
          Alteon with WL 6.0 can do load balancing for:
          entity bean
          stateless session bean
          but can't do load balancing for:
          stateful session bean (will persistent/sticky binding solve part of the
          problem except fail-over)
          in-memory replication
          am I right?
          Pao Wan
          "Don Ferguson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          news:[email protected]...
          > It is possible to configure Alteon to understand the WebLogic 6.0 cookie
          format
          > and have a proxy-less cluster configuration that performs load balancing
          and
          > fail over of session state.
          >
          > It is also possible to configure Alteon's hardware-based SSL decryption
          for really
          > fast HTTPS processing.
          >
          > We are working on a white paper that describes how to configure Alteon for
          use
          > with WebLogic Server 6.0.
          >
          > -Don
          >
          >
          > Robert Patrick wrote:
          >
          > > Cameron,
          > >
          > > I believe that BEA tested their new proxy-less web clustering solution
          with
          > > load-balancing products from Alteon and several other vendors
          (Arrowpoint ?--
          > > which is now Cisco). However, it was my understanding that these
          products do
          > > not understand how to decrypt our cookies and extract IP addresses but
          rather
          > > these products are capable of doing sticky load balancing based on the
          Session
          > > ID contained in our cookie.
          > >
          > > If this is correct, then what this means is that when the primary server
          fails,
          > > the request will be routed to "some other server" in the cluster but not
          > > necessarily the one that holds the secondary copy of the user's session.
          The
          > > change in WLS 6.0 is that WLS will accept these misdirected requests and
          it will
          > > go out to the correct server and "migrate" the session to the server
          that
          > > received the request making that server the new primary (and
          regenerating the
          > > Session ID).
          > >
          > > I am sure if this is wrong that our product manager or one of our
          engineers will
          > > correct me (please?)...
          > >
          > > Hope this helps,
          > > Robert
          > >
          > > Cameron Purdy wrote:
          > >
          > > > Hi Robert,
          > > >
          > > > FWIW - There are several vendors (Primeon? Arrowpoint?) who claim to
          > > > understand WL cookies and parse the IPs out. (I haven't verified it
          myself
          > > > though.)
          > > >
          > > > --
          > > > Cameron Purdy
          > > > Tangosol, Inc.
          > > > http://www.tangosol.com
          > > > +1.617.623.5782
          > > > WebLogic Consulting Available
          > > >
          > > > "Robert Patrick" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          > > > news:[email protected]...
          > > > > There are not any hardware vendors (yet) that can understand
          WebLogic's
          > > > session
          > > > > ID. While you might be able to use the load balancer without the
          proxy on
          > > > 5.1,
          > > > > you would not be able to take advantage of in-memory replication
          failover
          > > > unless
          > > > > you only had two machines in the cluster. Like you said, everything
          will
          > > > work
          > > > > with 6.0 regardless of how the load balancer works (though you
          really,
          > > > really
          > > > > want to minimize the number of times the requests come into the
          wrong
          > > > server by
          > > > > utilizing sticky load balancing).
          > > > >
          > > > > Hope this helps,
          > > > > Robert
          > > > >
          > > > > Cameron Purdy wrote:
          > > > >
          > > > > > Rajesh,
          > > > > >
          > > > > > I meant that it would work in lieu of a proxy (such as Apache or
          NES)
          > > > with
          > > > > > 5.1, but only if both the hw load balancer and WL were set up to
          use
          > > > > > cookies. Some hw load balancers rely on IP and that doesn't
          work -- AOL
          > > > > > connections for example can change the source IP on the fly.
          Others
          > > > produce
          > > > > > their own cookies, that will work. Some even can use WL cookies
          and
          > > > parse
          > > > > > them to determine where to go. According to what I've read, with
          6.0 if
          > > > the
          > > > > > WL primary dies or for some other reason the request shows up at
          the
          > > > "wrong"
          > > > > > server, it will be handled correctly. That means you are pretty
          safe
          > > > with
          > > > > > hw load balancers and 6.0, almost regardless of the sticky
          > > > implementation
          > > > > > that they use.
          > > > > >
          > > > > > --
          > > > > > Cameron Purdy
          > > > > > Tangosol, Inc.
          > > > > > http://www.tangosol.com
          > > > > > +1.617.623.5782
          > > > > > WebLogic Consulting Available
          > > > > >
          > > > > > "Rajesh" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          > > > > > news:[email protected]...
          > > > > > >
          > > > > > > Hi Cameron,
          > > > > > > Can you elaborate on how it would work with WL5.1 since no in
          memory
          > > > > > replication
          > > > > > > would happen if the servers are standalone.
          > > > > > >
          > > > > > > "Cameron Purdy" <[email protected]> wrote:
          > > > > > > >Yes, this will work fine with WL6. (WL5.1 will work fine as
          long as
          > > > > > cookies
          > > > > > > >are used by the load balancer.)
          > > > > > > >
          > > > > > > >--
          > > > > > > >Cameron Purdy
          > > > > > > >Tangosol, Inc.
          > > > > > > >http://www.tangosol.com
          > > > > > > >+1.617.623.5782
          > > > > > > >WebLogic Consulting Available
          > > > > > > >
          > > > > > > >
          > > > > > > >"paowan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          > > > > > > >news:[email protected]...
          > > > > > > >> Can I install weblogic as a standalone server on 2 or more
          server
          > > > and
          > > > > > > >> cluster/load balance weblogic using a hardware balancer like
          Alteon
          > > > > > Layer4
          > > > > > > >> switch (of course I will use a centralised storage to
          maintain a
          > > > single
          > > > > > > >copy
          > > > > > > >> of data which will eliminate syncronizing problem among
          servers)?
          > > > > > > >>
          > > > > > > >> BTW, Alteon can support persistent binding. The reason to use
          a
          > > > Layer
          > > > > > > >4
          > > > > > > >> switch is that it is very fast, and this will make the
          application
          > > > > > server
          > > > > > > >> layer transparent to client, the client can think this is a
          single
          > > > > > server
          > > > > > > >> (it don't need to know whether there are 5 weblogic servers
          or 20
          > > > > > weblogic
          > > > > > > >> servers behind switch), and hardware are more reliable,
          sacalable
          > > > and
          > > > > > > >fast.
          > > > > > > >>
          > > > > > > >> I am not sure whether the normal weblogic clustered servers
          need to
          > > > > > > >> share/exchange info on the running memory, if it does, this
          > > > approach
          > > > > > will
          > > > > > > >> fail.
          > > > > > > >>
          > > > > > > >>
          > > > > > > >
          > > > > > > >
          > > > > > >
          > > > >
          >

I have some web pages that loaded completely when using 3G but partially loaded using Wifi.

I have some web pages that loaded completely when using 3G but partially loaded (only text without any images ) using Wifi. Is it a site specific issue?

Can you rule out the NoScript extension as a cause of the issues on those sites? Even if you allow the main site to run scripts, often a website will spread its content over additional servers, so you may need to visit the "S" button menu a second or third time to get full functionality. (Over time, you'll recognize some the servers as being for ads, tracking, or sharing buttons and you can just let those parts of the page not work.)

Does resteasy API have class loader issues when using via OSGi

Does resteasy API have class loader issues when using via OSGi

Hi Scott,
THis isnt an answer to ur Question, but could u tell me which jar files are needed for the packages:
com.sap.portal.pcm.system.ISystems
com.sap.portal.pcm.system.ISystem
and under which path I coul dfind them.
Thnx
Regards
Meesum.

Partial page load problem when using Muse in an existing non-Muse Masterpage; how to issue a jquery

Partial page load problem when using Muse in an existing non-Muse Masterpage; how to issue a jquery args.get_isPartialLoad().
My page is loaded into a palcehold within the Ajax update panel within the current Masterpage, so page loadload doesn't occur. But if my Muse page can capture the partial pageload then I can tell jquery to run the Muse formating routine.

Jackie, I am having the same issue and agree that it obscures our site analytics.
I only have the "WebMarketing" subscription - so I cannot see how often people visit my site (unless I just dont know how to view that). Here is a screen shot of how many different locations I have and how much it affects my site visitor count based on the other locations which seem "legit" because they have more page views than visits.
I hope there is a way to fix or block this.

Load balancing weirdness using NAT and same-metric route

Hi.
I'm trying to set up a double-WAN load-balancing scenario:
I decided to attempt the "multiple same-metric routes with NAT" approach so I went for the example used in the IOS NAT Load-Balancing for Two ISP Connections Configuration Guide [1].
I decided to use an upside-down Cisco 871-SEC/K9: use Vlan1 and Vlan2 for the routers and Fa4 for the LAN. I am hoping this is not an issue.
There is this weirdness with some connections, particularly FTP. I pinpointed the problem to the following scenario: if I do a couple of pings to 100.1.1.1 using the FastEthernet4 as the source address, this is what I get in the logs:
=== PING 1 ECHO REQUEST ===
*Mar 3 04:38:43.521: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.60.4 (FastEthernet4), d=100.1.1.1 (Vlan1), routed via RIB
*Mar 3 04:38:43.521: NAT: s=192.168.60.4->10.129.124.2, d=100.1.1.1 [14152]
*Mar 3 04:38:43.521: IP: s=10.129.124.2 (FastEthernet4), d=100.1.1.1 (Vlan1), g=10.129.124.1, len 60, forward
*Mar 3 04:38:43.521: ICMP type=8, code=0
=== PING 1 ECHO REPLY ===
*Mar 3 04:38:45.589: NAT*: s=100.1.1.1, d=10.129.124.2->192.168.60.4 [19824]
*Mar 3 04:38:45.589: IP: tableid=0, s=100.1.1.1 (Vlan1), d=192.168.60.4 (FastEthernet4), routed via RIB
*Mar 3 04:38:45.589: IP: s=100.1.1.1 (Vlan1), d=192.168.60.4 (FastEthernet4), g=192.168.60.4, len 60, forward
*Mar 3 04:38:45.589: ICMP type=0, code=0
=== (something else) ===
*Mar 3 04:38:52.353: RT: SET_LAST_RDB for 0.0.0.0/0
OLD rdb: via 10.129.124.33, Vlan2
NEW rdb: via 10.129.124.1, Vlan1
=== PING 2 ECHO REQUEST ===
*Mar 3 04:38:52.353: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.60.4 (FastEthernet4), d=100.1.1.1 (Vlan2), routed via RIB
*Mar 3 04:38:52.353: NAT: s=192.168.60.4->10.129.124.2, d=100.1.1.1 [14159]
*Mar 3 04:38:52.353: IP: s=10.129.124.2 (FastEthernet4), d=100.1.1.1 (Vlan2), g=10.129.124.33, len 60, forward
*Mar 3 04:38:52.353: ICMP type=8, code=0
=== PING 2 ECHO REPLY ===
*Mar 3 04:38:53.029: NAT*: s=100.1.1.1, d=10.129.124.2->192.168.60.4 [19825]
*Mar 3 04:38:53.029: IP: tableid=0, s=100.1.1.1 (Vlan1), d=192.168.60.4 (FastEthernet4), routed via RIB
*Mar 3 04:38:53.033: IP: s=100.1.1.1 (Vlan1), d=192.168.60.4 (FastEthernet4), g=192.168.60.4, len 60, forward
*Mar 3 04:38:53.033: ICMP type=0, code=0
In the section "Ping 2 Echo Request" line 2 shows the NAT translating the packet to the address for the first provider but line 3 shows it routing it through the second one.
In this case, the ICMP packet goes through but it is problematic if the ISP restricts the service by source-address (like RPF) or there is some acceleration mechanism inside the provider cloud, other than just plain routing.
What am I missing? Here is the relevant part of the configuration. I deliberately disabled CEF to be able to debug the messages, but I *think* this may be altering the actual router behavior. This router does not have a "debug ip cef packet" command.
no ip cef
ip dhcp pool lan-side
import all
network 192.168.60.0 255.255.255.0
default-router 192.168.60.1
domain-name doublewan.local
dns-server 8.8.8.8 8.8.4.4
lease infinite
ip domain name doublewan
interface FastEthernet0
!doesn't appear on running-config: vlan 1 is the default access vlan
!switchport access vlan 1
interface FastEthernet1
switchport access vlan 2
interface FastEthernet2
shutdown
interface FastEthernet3
shutdown
interface FastEthernet4
ip address 192.168.60.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
no ip route-cache
duplex auto
speed auto
interface Vlan1
ip address 10.129.124.2 255.255.255.224
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
no ip route-cache
interface Vlan2
ip address 10.129.124.35 255.255.255.224
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
no ip route-cache
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Vlan1 10.129.124.1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Vlan2 10.129.124.33
ip nat inside source route-map nat1 interface Vlan1 overload
ip nat inside source route-map nat2 interface Vlan2 overload
ip access-list standard acl4-nexthop-vlan1
permit 10.129.124.1
ip access-list standard acl4-nexthop-vlan2
permit 10.129.124.33
route-map nat2 permit 10
match ip address 102
match ip next-hop acl4-nexthop-vlan2
match interface Vlan2
route-map nat1 permit 10
match ip address 101
match ip next-hop acl4-nexthop-vlan1
match interface Vlan1
control-plane
Of course, there is some configuration pending for redundancy and stuff.
Thanks a lot in advance.
[1] http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/network-address-translation-nat/100658-ios-nat-load-balancing-2isp.html

Hello.
This might be a bug in debug command or the IOS (without ip cef) you use; as routing is done before NAT (inside to outside).
To make sure it works fine with ip cef, just enable strict uRPF (or just ACL) on .1 and .33 interfaces and see if you see any packet sent over wrong interface.
PS: please check "sh ip cef 100.1.1.1"; I guess ip cef would tell you "per-destination sharing".

Load balancing with use of router 881.

Hello,
I have two MPLS line and i want load balancing with the help of CISCO router 881. is it necessary that i require two router on both location.? if one location have firewall and one location have cisco router 881 then can i do a load balancing or i require two router each on both location ? What are the basic requirement that i need.
Thanks,
Kuntal

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
An 881 should be able to load share across multiple ports. Many routing protocol support ECMP, including BGP, but you need "special" hidden/secret commands to enable. EIGRP also supports unequal cost load sharing.
If an 881 supports OER or PfR, those too will do unequal load sharing, dynamically.

Load balancing when creating Broadcast setting

Hi guys,
how can i use the load balancing possibility when creating a broadcast setting of a workbook?
i have 2 precalculation server determined in RSprecadmin. When the first precalculation server has status maximum capacity reached the next free available precalculation server is used. But in my case the first 10 workbooks are precalculated with one server then the other free and available server is not used anymore.
How can i have more than 10 workbooks in the queue?
Thanks,
Murat

Hello,
Please check if process based load distribution helps (SAP BW Precalculation Service Multi Instance)
Apply these 2 Notes:
1275837 PrecServer: process based load distribution (ABAP part)
1275828 PrecServer: process based load distribution (Frontend part)
Thanks,
Michael
Edited by: Michael Devine on Aug 23, 2010 10:21 AM

Issue in setting flex app in load balanced environment using SSL

I have developed the dashboard in my application using flex 3.0. For this I have used JSP wrapper around the flex application. My application runs on JBoss application server. for communication between flex app and my application i am using LCDS. HTTPService component is being used to receive data from the server. Channel definitions are given in service-config.xml for amf and http channels and for both secure secure and not secure mode. In my proxy-config.xml i have defined Channels and destinations.
services-config.xml
<channel-definition id="my-amf" class="mx.messaging.channels.AMFChannel">
    <endpoint url="http://{server.name}:{server.port}/{context.root}/messagebroker/amf" class="flex.messaging.endpoints.AMFEndpoint"/>
    <properties>
          <polling-enabled>false</polling-enabled>
    </properties>
</channel-definition>
<channel-definition id="my-secure-amf" class="mx.messaging.channels.SecureAMFChannel">
    <endpoint url="https://{server.name}:{server.port}/{context.root}/messagebroker/amfsecure" class="flex.messaging.endpoints.SecureAMFEndpoint"/>
    <properties>
          <add-no-cache-headers>false</add-no-cache-headers>
    </properties>
</channel-definition>
<channel-definition id="my-http" class="mx.messaging.channels.HTTPChannel">
    <endpoint url="http://{server.name}:{server.port}/{context.root}/messagebroker/http" class="flex.messaging.endpoints.HTTPEndpoint"/>
</channel-definition>
<channel-definition id="my-secure-http" class="mx.messaging.channels.SecureHTTPChannel">
    <endpoint url="https://{server.name}:{server.port}/{context.root}/messagebroker/httpsecure" class="flex.messaging.endpoints.SecureHTTPEndpoint"/>
    <properties>
        <add-no-cache-headers>false</add-no-cache-headers>
    </properties>
</channel-definition>
proxy-config.xml
<default-channels>
    <channel ref="my-http"/>
    <channel ref="my-amf"/>
    <channel ref="my-secure-http"/>
    <channel ref="my-secure-amf"/>
</default-channels>
<destination id="dashboardService">
    <properties>
<url>/kr/servlet/DashboardServlet</url>
    </properties>
</destination>
<destination id="dashboardJSPService">
    <properties>
<url>/kr/krportal/dashboardJSPService.jsf</url>
    </properties>
</destination>
In my development environment both secure and non secure mode were working fine. Now when I have deployed it behind the load balancer(which accepts secure requests only and if the request is not secure it redirects it to secure url) there is no response from the message broker servlet. One thing more I have observed is when the environment is non load balanced there are request like 'http://{server.name}:{server.port}/{context.root}/messagebroker/http'. and these requests are post request. But in load balanced environment with ssl the request is again like 'http://{server.name}:{server.port}/{context.root}/messagebroker/http' which is a post request and it is redirected to 'https://{server.name}:{server.port}/{context.root}/messagebroker/http' which is a get request. The content returned by this get request is null.
Looking for some comments
Thanks
Abhishek Gupta

if the load balancing environment is already well configured, thes rest is very easy, there is no difference between a configuration of load balancing environment and a simple one, for you that is transparent, except the manual deployment and manual copying
of files in the directory 15

Documents in Sharepoint don't load correctly when using Windows 8.1

Hi All,
We currently have a problem with SharePoint incorrectly loading Documents when on a Windows 8 machine when the link to the document is within an iFrame or a direct link.
For example:
Windows 7 User clicks on a SharePoint document link (for example: http://intranet/Customers/Customer/Proposal.docx), this link is embedded in an iFrame in another site (for example: http://crm/Customers/Customer/Proposals).
The document then loads or presents a 'Open, Save or Save As' option.
Windows 8 User clicks on the same SharePoint document link, The document loads in the background of the user. The process WINWORD.exe is in the task manager, but nothing is displayed.
This is only for Windows 8 users. I have tried both on IE 11 and 10 on Windows 7 machines and as long as the user has the Office Document Cache Handler installed and enabled, the user is fine.
Navigating directly to the Intranet with the Windows 8 User and locating the document opens the document as normal with no Issues.
Directly copying the address to the document and pasting it into the address bar presents the same issue.
The issue seems to be the way in which Windows 8 computers deal with SharePoint documents, in that the addin which helps with version controlling documents in Office 2013 does not load when a document is directly clicked, rather than navigating to sharepoint
and then finding the document.
I can provide further information if needed.

Hi,
I wonder if you directly insert a link to document from address in the curren site home page, it still does not work:
From your description, I suspect the issue might be related to browser. Could you please test the issue with other browser on the Windows 8.1? I am using Windows 8.1 as client machine and I cannot reproduce the issue.
Regards,
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

ACE: load balancing servers using DMZ ports on FWSM

devices; (2 core with the ff config)
6500
fwsm
idsm
msfc
SETUP;
Servers are connected to the dmzs on the core
REQUIREMENT;
to load balance the servers
QUESTION;
Using the ACE module, is it possibe to load balance the servers which are connected to the port which is configured as DMZ?
Thanks

does not matter where the servers are connected.
However, be aware that the flows from client to server needs to go through the loadbalancer BUT also the flows server to client.
So, you should be careful where you attach the ACE module.
The easier would be to attach to the DMZ as well between the FW and the servers.
Gilles.

Load Balancing OBIEE using OC4J

Hi All,
I would like to know if there is a way of load balancing 2 instances of OBIEE using OC4J.
Please advice if possible and the steps required to achieve that.
A small correction ... we have 2 instance of OBIEE and 2 of stand alone of OC4J
Is there any way we can attempt to load balance the two???
Regards,
maabajaber
Edited by: maabajaber on Sep 22, 2010 4:19 AM

Hi All,
A small correction ... we have 2 instance of OBIEE and 2 of stand alone of OC4J.
I believe OC4J stand alone can do this but i dont know how
Is there any way we can attempt to load balance the two.
Regards,
maabajaber

Load-balance / autofailover using 2 ISPs

Good morning.
we have a T1 installed at our site and recently purchased a broadband connection from a different ISP. Our plan is to utilize both ISPs to Load-balance our Internet and setup auto-failover in case either one fails. We run exchange 2007 and host an ASP application so we can't afford to have our Internet disrupted.
currently we have a 1841 cisco router for the T1 and we're trying to figure-out if we need to purchase an ASA Firewall to setup the auto fail-over / load balance system.
Can you tell me which is the best way to do this and what equipment / model of cisco routers/ Firewalls do you recommend to implement this?
Thanks,
Collin

Hi Collin -- We appreciate your post but, as this pertains to ISR 1841, think you'd be better served in the Cisco NetPro Forums.
Here's the link:http://forums.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf;jsessionid=37FE634C9B9344028C695A694C4E3971.SJ2A?page=netprof&forum=Small%20and%20Medium%20Business&topic=Technologies%20for%20Small%20Medium%20Businesses&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_messages%26mode%3Dnew%26location%3D.1ddbf5a7.
Thanks,
Stephanie

In MIRO, how can I get a credit to balance when using dr/cr lines?

When processing a logistics invoice verification document via MIRO, we're trying to post a credit memo against a purchase order with muliple lines (one return, and on non-return line). The value of the return line is greater, and the invoice is billing for receipts/returns on mulitple lines on the PO (it has a credit amount for the entire return to be posted against the return line, and a restocking fee to be posted against a text based PO line).
In MIRO, I have selected credit memo and am posting a credit for a gross amount of $550 in the header. The return line I'm trying to post against is for $575, and the non-return line for the restocking fee is for $25. However, when I'm posting against both, the system is indicating that I'm out of balance by $50. It appears that it's not calculating the $25 as a credit. I've tried looking at documents around posting against returns and posting credits, but haven't seen anything that addresses this scenario. I've also tried using negative amounts, but SAP does not accept these. We're currently using SAP ECC 6.0. How can I get this to balance?

Only Apple Account Security could help at this point. You can try calling Apple Support in Canada - you'll have to find one of the several ways, such as Skype, to call an 800 number from outside of the relevant country - and ask for Account Security and see if they can help. Or you can find a friend who speaks Chinese and ask them to help you talk to Apple Support in China. There are really no other options that I know of.
Note, by the way, that these are user-to-user support forums. You aren't speaking with Apple when you post here.
Regards.

Why do some webpages not finish loading images when using cellular data instead of WiFi?

I'm using iPhone 6 64gb. The problem existed with iOS 8.0.0 and the iOS 8.0.2 update.
I have had trouble with webpages loading slowly over AT&T LTE. Sites with multiple images frequently have trouble loading all the images entirely. Instead, the unloaded portion of the image fills in with black or the image fails to load at all. If I switch to WiFi when available and refresh the page, the images will usually reload completely. I never had this problem with the iPhone 5s on the same websites.

I'm on AT&T with an iPhone 5 first gen. This problem is happening across iPhone4s al of the way to iPhone6+
Thought it was only affecting newer iPhones with new Graphic Processors but I later ruled that out.
Seems to only be happening on LTE / 4G. Is not affected on WIFI for me.
I clear cache, crash browser and even reset the phone but will still get unexpected results in LTE or 4G.
The images seem to be getting prematurely cached and are only partially rendering.
When I save the these half loaded images in photoshop I get a warning that they are damaged and/or truncated.
I have saved images out as PNG and JPGs renders poorly.
About the images-
These images are only 15k and there are 16 on the page so I can't see why they would get bottlenecked when loading.
also, there is no background-color of black anywhere in the CSS.
Note the TV-Like static on the bottom image similar to the comment ryzer08 above.
NEXT IMAGE.....

EIGRP load balancing when using HSRP on LAN

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for