Eigrp support for Vrf-lite on 3550 switches

Folks,
Cisco has added support for EIGRP for Vrf-lite on Sup 720's and Metro 3750 swithches. Just curious if anyone knows timeline when Cisco would be doing the same for 3550 series switches.
Thanks

No current plans at this time for EIGRP for Vrf-lite on 3550 since 3750 platform supports it. Contact your account team for feature request who can contact the business unit with a business case.

Similar Messages

  • JDK/JRE Version support for Oracle Lite

    Hi,
    We have developed an application using jdk 1.4.x which also using Oracle9i Lite 5.0.2 release as a database. Application behaves normal except while closing it throws java exception (Exceptio Guard Page Exception) error.
    Is it because of the JDK Version we are using? What is the JDK/JRE version level supported by Oracle Lite.
    Thanks
    Krishna

    Right
    I got the same problem too.
    When my program and oracle 9i lite is running under JRE1.3.1, everything is ok.
    However, when i migrate the jre to 1.4.x, the program must fail and report DLL exception after closing.
    So trouble~!

  • VoIp settings for replacing a Cisco 3550 switch with a SF300-24P

    I am adding the SF300-24P to an existing set of switches.  My backbone switch is a 3560.
    The 3550 I am replacing has this config for each port that supports a Shoretel phone
    switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
    switchport mode trunk
    mls qos trust dscp
    global settings include
    spaning-tree mode pvst
    spanning-tree extend system-id
    spanning-tree vlan 1,200 priority 28762
    vlan internal allocation policy ascending
    all other settings are at default
    Any ideas how to replicate this on this new switch?  I added the Shoretel mac address range (00-10-49) into the Telephone OUI.  The phone gets power, I think it gets a 192.168.6.x address (local subnet), but then it should get an IP 10.6.0.xx on its VLAN - but it doesn't.
    Some configs from the backbone are attached.  I did not need to configure any of this in the 3550.
    Any ideas?
    Fred

    Hi fred,
    The shoretel phone sounds like it is not attaching to tagged  vlan 200 on my switch, the shortel voice vlan as per your screen captures.
    The Voice VLAN should be tagged on my switch so that phones attach to a Voice VLAN and PC's connected on the back of the VoIP phones attach to  the Data Vlan .
    I scoped out, excuse the pun, the shoretel site and have attached a white paper on setting vlans and shoretel.
    They mention setting option 156 on the DHCP server, so the phone can get vendor specific information etc...  But the phones are not attached to the voice vlan , but the untagged data vlan.  You gotta figure how to get the shortel phones to attach to vlan 200, or if you are not daisy chaining PC on the back of the phone, make vlan 200 untagged on these FastEthernet switch ports..
    I have attached my SF300-48P version of my configuration and some configuration screen shots i took along the way.
    Please review carefully that attached shortel document and my screen  shots and a real configuration done on my SF300-48P.  The configuration should be almost identical to your configuration.
    I added vlan 200. and made sure that all ports were in trunk mode, even the Gigabit uplink ports.
    All ports by default are in VLAN1  as you can see below
    I then added all ports as tagged ports to vlan 200 as you can see below.
    For the sake of Spanning tree, I then made all fast ethernet (phone or PC) ports  fastports except for the uplink Gigabit ports.
    If you are not sure what portfast does , here's a little tutorial I grabbed from cisco.com
    Spanning-tree PortFast causes a port to enter the spanning-tree forwarding state immediately, bypassing the listening and learning states. You can use PortFast on switch ports connected to a single workstation or server to allow those devices to connect to the network immediately, instead of waiting for the port to transition from the listening and learning states to the forwarding state.
    Caution PortFast should be used only when connecting a single end station to a switch port. If you enable PortFast on a port connected to another networking device, such as a switch, you can create network loops.
    When the switch powers up, or when a device is connected to a port, the port normally enters the spanning-tree listening state. When the forward delay timer expires, the port enters the learning state. When the forward delay timer expires a second time, the port is transitioned to the forwarding or blocking state.
    When you enable PortFast on a port, the port is immediately and permanently transitioned to the spanning-tree forwarding state.
    Your tasks I guess should be , making sure that vendor specific options for the shoretel phones are included in the DHCP configuration and that you somehow attach the shortel phones (even manually) to vlan 200.
    For some reason this site adds a zip extension to the end of my running configuration.  I used wordpad to look at the file 
    I am using firmware version 1.0.0.27 on my unit and the userid=admin  password i used was admin
    I hope this helps.
    regards Dave

  • Question to understand VRF and VRF-lite features

    Hi,
    when I look at METRO switches  Feature list I see that most of them support only "VRF-Lite".
    Does it mean that they can't work with MPLS lables and can't be placed as PE devices in cases  where we need VPN services or any kinf of "Lable-switching" services?
    Which role then does those METRO switches play in a network?

    Hello Konstantin,
    VRF lite is a subset of MPLS L3 VPN features missing MPLS forwarding plane capabilities.
    An end to end dedicated IP path is needed for each VRF, practically a VRF-lite capable device should be connected to a fully capable PE node by using a L2 trunk and dedicating at least two Vlan and two  SVI for each VRF: one towards customer and one towards PE.
    you get a multi VRF CE that can be shared by multiple customers
    a fully capable PE node uses N+1 links for N VRFs, a multiVRF CE requires 2*N logical interfaces for N VRFs
    only one MPLS enabled backbone link is needed for handling traffic of multiple VRFs in a fully capable PE node.
    in metro ethernet VRF lite multi VRF CE are used as feeders sort of satellite of PE nodes to provide an access layer to customers
    Hope to help
    Giuseppe

  • How many VRF-Lite Routing Instances can a 6509-E with a 720-Sup module run?

    I know that in a 4500 style switch it supports a maximum of 64 VRF-lite routing instances. However what is the maximum amount of VRF-Lite routing instances can a 6509-E switch support with a Sup-720 sup module?

    Sup 720  supports 1024 VRF Lites
    see table-1 in this link:
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-6500-series-switches/product_data_sheet09186a0080159856.html
    HTH

  • What is VRF-Lite

    Can anyone explain what is the difference between VRF and VRF Lite. What is the main purpose/application of VRF Lite?
    Thanks in advance
    AK

    Vrf-lite is a leaner cut down version of MPLS-VRF.
    Where in MPLS-VRF you need labels for VPN traffic switching, you dont need labels in VRF-lite.
    VRF-lite mainly relies on routing using multiple virtual routing instances created for each vrf for switching traffic. There is no label switching for VRF-lite.
    Since there is no label switching, you need to populate VRF's on every hop on your network. For example |Lan--PE1---PE2---PE3--Lan|
    PE1 has 2 vrf's connected to a local lan, to route these VRF's to the other end(PE3), you will need to have dedicated interfaces(or subinterfaces on each hop and enable routing instances for each VRF on each hop.
    But with MPLS-VRF you need to just enable the VRF's on PE1 and PE3 with MPBGP and Label Switching enabled.
    So the advantage of VRF-Lite is to have virtualization of your sub-networks a smaller scale. If you have a big network, you may very well consider implementing MPLS (even though you may be an enterprise).
    HTH-Cheers,
    Swaroop

  • MPLS / vrf-lite

    Hi
    We currently use a BT MPLS network and use BGP on our CE router to peer with the providers PE routers. Currently we only use one VPN for production across the MPLS network.
    We are now looking to give access from some of our MPLS sites to a test environment housed in our data centre. We need to do this on a pc by pc basis.
    At the moment the plan is to add a Test VPN within the MPLS network. All sites will be a member of the production VPN and those sites that also need access to test environment will be a member of the Test vpn.
    This will segregate the traffic over the WAN but the issue i now have is how to segregate the traffic once it leaves the PE router. The link between the CE and PE router is just a layer 3 link so the VPN separation
    has disappeared by now. I don't mind the traffic not being separated in terms of VPN's on the CE to PE link but i need to segregate the traffic once it leaves the CE router and enters our LAN.
    So finally the questions
    1) Is there a way to keep the separation at a VPN level on the CE -> PE link. As i say i don't mind not having it but if there is a way i would be interested.
    2) More importantly i have done some limited reading on VRF-lite and was wondering before i go further if that would allow me to segregate the traffic internally within the LAN. Our Lan's in major buildings usually consist
    of 4500 at the access-layer and 6500 as distribtion/core. What i would ideally like to do is ensure that only users within the site who need to access the test environment can ie. by adding a site to the TEST vpn this does
    not mean that all users within the site should be able to get to it.
    I could
    i) Use PBR together with access-list and potentially firewalls
    ii) use vrf-lite to segregate the traffic.
    So is this a good application for vrf-lite or have i missed the point of it ?. if not can anyone suggest a better way ?
    Many thanks
    Jon

    Joseph/Anantha
    Thanks to both of you for your replies. If i could just query your expertise a little more.
    Attached is a visio of a site that i would like to be able to access both the Test and Production VPN's. The key thing to note is that we are routing from the access-layer down to the distribution 6500 switches.
    Now on the 4500 i can have 2 separate VRF's, one for the Prod VPN and one for the Test VPN. I can then assign different vlan interfaces into the relevant vrf.
    Am i right in my assumptions so far ?
    The problem i am having in taking this further is that a L3 interface can only be in one VRF and as the connections from the 4500 to the 6500 are L3 uplinks i can't allocate the L3 link into 2 separate vrf's (nor would it make sense to do so).
    I am not in a position to change the L3 links to L2 links which would solve part of the problem as the vlan interfaces would then be on the 6500 and i could allocate these interfaces into separate VRF's.
    So is there any way, bearing in mind that i need to keep L3 links from the access-layer, that i can segregate the routing tables on the 6500 and 7200 router.
    If i can't do this then i don't see the advantage of trying to use VRF-lite because the 6500/7200 and 3800 will all have one routing table with both Test and Prod routes in in it and this means without route filtering these routes will get propogated by the 3800 to our remote sites.
    If i have to revert to route-filtering i may as well not bother with vrf-lite ?
    Jon

  • Native Multi-VRF-Lite Design with EIGRP Question

    Hello,
    we think about to implement a VRF-Lite design (no MPLS and MBGP) in our campus network (10,000 ports, 20x 6500Sup720, 400x L2-Switches). MPLS is from our point of view oversized for our requirements. We need only a segmentation from different departments. Our IGP is eigrp.
    In the latest IOS-Release for the cat6500 (12.2.18SXD) is finally a VRF-Lite support for EIGRP inside.
    We could test successful a design with different VRFs in our lab, the division workes fine. But we didn't found a way to implement shared service. These are in our case DHCP, DNS, InternerAccess and some others. We thought about a redistribution between our global EIGRP routing table and the EIGRP-vrf tables, but we didn't found a way to do this.
    How can we do this?
    Thanks

    Use a crossover cable to connect a port belonging to the global routing table to a port belonging to a VRF. This way you can leak EIGRP routes from the global routing table into the VRF (through that physical connection). The drawback is that you use 2 ports (that could instead be used for other things...).
    Another way to this, would be to use static routing; use ip route vrf VRF x.x.x.x m.m.m.m n.n.n.n global to allow traffic to go from the VRF into the global routing table.
    Hope that helps...

  • What Image of 3750 supports VRF lite?

    Folks,
    I want to implement VRF lite in my network, we have a bunch of 3750's in out network at the edge. Cisco doc says that 3750 support vrf lite, but i tried to download
    Base
    ip services
    advanced service image
    for the 3750, and i still do not see the VRF lite commands?
    Any ideas?

    According to the IOS Feature Navigator, any EMI image from 12.1(11)EA1 supports VRF lite.
    Please refer to the following URL to access the IOS Feature Navigator:
    http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/CFN/jsp/index.jsp
    Hope this helps,

  • Enum class not supported for switch() statement in 12.4 beta?

    Hi fellow 12.4 beta testers,
    It would appear "enum class" isn't supported for switch() statements in the 12.4 beta. This compiles fine under clang and g++. Will this be fixed for the final release? This currently causes compile errors for us, since __cplusplus >= 201103L evaluates to true, so our code uses "enum class" instead of plain "enum". It looks like the C++11 standard says it should be supported:
       Switching on enum class in C++ 0x - Stack Overflow
    Many thanks,
    Jonathan.
    $ cat test.cpp
    #include <iostream>
    enum class Ternary { KnownFalse = 0, KnownTrue = 1, Unknown = 2 };
    int main( void )
       Ternary foo;
       switch ( foo ) {
          case Ternary::KnownTrue:
          case Ternary::KnownFalse:
          case Ternary::Unknown:
             std::cout << "Success\n";
    $ clang++ -std=c++11 test.cpp
    $ g++ -std=c++11 test.cpp
    $ /opt/SolarisStudio12.4-beta_mar14-solaris-x86/bin/CC -std=c++11 test.cpp
    "test.cpp", line 8: Error: Cannot use Ternary to initialize integral type.
    "test.cpp", line 8: Error: Switch selection expression must be of an integral type.
    "test.cpp", line 9: Error: An integer constant expression is required for a case label.
    "test.cpp", line 10: Error: An integer constant expression is required for a case label.
    "test.cpp", line 11: Error: An integer constant expression is required for a case label.
    5 Error(s) detected.

    Thanks for reporting this problem! I have filed bug 18499900.
    BTW, according to the C++11 standard, the code is actually not valid. Section 6.4.2, switch statement, says an implicit conversion to an integral type is required, which is not the case for for a scoped enum (one using the "class enum" syntax). This limitation was raised in the C++ Committee as an issue to be fixed, and the C++14 standard makes the code valid.
    As a workaround, or to make the code conform to C++11, you can add casts to int for the enum variable and the enumerators.
    Message was edited by: Steve_Clamage

  • Switch support for NAC CCA for 6500 series switch

    per the 4.0 document "switch support for Cisco NAC" there is a note that says
    Catalyst 6000/6500 on IOS do not support mac-notification
    Does this mean you cannot deploy layer 2 OOB mode, as snmp notification to the CAM will not happen with the 6k platform?

    Probably, the configuration guide will give you better idea about your problem.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps708/products_configuration_guide_book09186a00803f5611.html

  • JDBC2 support for Oracle 8i Lite

    Hi,
    I was just wondering if the JDBC driver included with Oracle 8i Lite supports JDBC2, and if not, is there a newer version that does (I couldn't find anything on the downloads page).
    Thanks,
    Raj.

    Just wondering if any one has been able to write a CodeWarrior project that connects to a database through ODBC. I've been having problems compiling my CodeWarrior project file. I am trying to use my existing code which connects to a DB2 Everywhere database, but instead replacing it with an Oracle 8i Lite database.
    If any one has had experience with this, e-mail me at [email protected]
    Thanks for your help.
    <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Alvin Chin ([email protected]):
    Mark,
    The SQL functions being undefined in my C file are as follows:
    SQLAllocEnv
    SQLAllocConnect
    SQLFreeEnv
    SQLConnect
    SQLFreeEnv
    SQLFreeConnect
    SQLAllocStmt
    SQLDisconnect
    SQLPrepare
    SQLBindParameter
    SQLExecute
    SQLFetch
    SQLGetData
    SQLFreeStmt
    Is it a correct assumption that since I used these ODBC functions from DB2 Everywhere (which were in the DB2e library and header files), that I can still use these functions with Oracle 8i Lite? Isn't the ODBC API for Oracle Lite standard for all ODBC applications? Or does Oracle Lite implement these differently. What header files and library files am I missing?
    I tried to do a search for the SQLAllocEnv function and the only files that contain this are:
    sqlapi.h
    odbc.h
    odbc.lib
    olod2040.lib
    olsql40.lib
    I tried to include the olod2040.lib and olsql40.lib files but I after compiling, I got "illegal file object data'.
    So what files am I missing in order to compile?
    Thanks.
    <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
    null

  • Flash lite 2.x support for nokia n80?

    I downloaded and installed the Flash Lite 2.1 standalone
    player for the Nokia N80 from this page:
    https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=flashlite2%5F1%5Fsymbian%5Fdownload
    I am able to run Flash Lite 1.1 SWFs fine but get
    "installation not supported" for 2.x SIS files and "unable to open.
    file corrupted" messages for 2.x SWFs. These files run fine on my
    Nokia 6682 handset.
    Is 2.0 or 2.1 supported for the N80? I noticed that it
    doesn't appear to be through the Adobe Device Central CS3 but the
    Flash Lite Player download page implies that it is.
    Thanks.

    Just tried installing Flash Lite 2.1 Standalone Player S60
    V2.0 FP2 and S60 V2.0 FP3 and was not allowed to install either on
    the handset so I think the one I downloaded and installed is
    correct. Flash Lite Player 2 is not installed on this phone.
    Any other possible reason why the Flash Lite apps won't run?
    Does the phone need a firmware or other update? Also, I am by
    sending the SWFs via bluetooth as SMS messages--that shouldn't
    matter, should it? Or do I need to go the long route by
    transferring it via usb?

  • Cisco Prime LMS 4.1 - Support for Cisco Catalyst 3560-C Series Switches

    Hello together
    I have a customer which uses the following switch. Last year I have installed LMS 4.1 for him to manage the switches. Unfortunatly the switch model is not supported. According to the information found on the following site the switch is supported for most of the modules in LMS:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/ciscoworks_lan_management_solution/4.1/device_support/table/lms41sdt.html
    The oid object of the device is the following: 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1465
    Supported Software: 12.2(55)EX (Customer has 12.2(55)EX3
    Version Support Type: Device Update
    So I updated all device updates I was able to find.
    Step 1: For that I went to Admin > System > Software Center > Schedule Device Downloads and created a job where I have downloaded the latest versions of all packages.
    Step 2: Installed the downloaded packages Admin > System > Software Center > Device Update and installed all the packages.
    Unfortunatly I don't see the same result like described in the Supported Device Table for LMS 4.1.
    - Cisco View -> works
    - Inventory and Config Collection -> works
    - Fault Monitor not working -> Error Code Unsupported
    - Network Topology Layer 2 Services -> Device Type ciscoProducts.1465, Symbol Question Mark
    - VLAN Management -> Doesn't work
    - User Tracking > seems also not to work
    When I open the report for supported devcies (Reports > System > Device Support) and search for C3560C... I find the following devices, but not mine which i need:
    C3560C-8PC-S     .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1466
    C3560CG8PC         .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1317
    C3560CCG8TC     .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1318
    wsC3560CPD8ptS     .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1368
    Does anybody have experience with the same switch type / model? Am I doing something wrong or is this type of switch not implemented correctly till now? Further the docuemntation supported devices would be wrong.
    Thanks for any feedback Erich

    Thanks but I just heard back from my Cisco SE and he assures me that an AP will NOT use up a license.
    I've asked him to verify his answer for me.
    Is your answer based on real world expereince (the best there is)?  That is, are you running Prime LMS 4.1 and does it indeed use up a license for each light-weight AP it discovers & manages?
    Thanks for mentioning options 1-3 but I do not wish to employ any of them.  I don't mind buying the additional licenses for APs ... I just need to know if I have to or not.
    Ian.

  • Multi-VRF CE or VRF-Lite support on 1800/2800

    Can anyone please confirm whether ISR 1800 and 2800 series devices support Multi-VRF CE functionality and which IOS release should be used?
    I could not find any document which is explicitly mentioning the above for the mentioned boxes.
    Actually my Purchase Order has been held up due to this... ;-)
    Thanks...

    Yes, they both do. For specific IOS version required, please refer to the Cisco IOS features navigator:
    http://tools.cisco.com/ITDIT/CFN/jsp/index.jsp
    Hope this helps,

Maybe you are looking for