Ejb param serialization, is readResolve called for Externalizable param?

hi,
I have a stateless session bean with an enum parameter.
When the session bean is called from a remote client, i noticed that the readResolve method of my enum class is not called on the server.
Does anyone know if weblogic calls the readResolve method of session bean Externalizable parameters ?
FYI, My Enum class is Externalizale and relies on its readResolve method to ensure enum unicity within the JVM. I tested it with simple java code and serialization/deserialization in a file and it worked well.
My config is sunJDK1.3.1 with weblogic server 7.0
thank you for your help !
nicolas D.

hi andy
thanks a lot for your reply !! It makes my mind clearer !
Nicolas
ps: How comes I saw your reply only now (21st of september) as i checked the forum regularly and could not find it earlier ?

Similar Messages

I have a production mobile Flex app that uses RemoteObject calls for all data access, and it's working well, except for a new remote call I just added that only fails when running with a release build. The same call works fine when running on the device

I have a production mobile Flex app that uses RemoteObject calls for all data access, and it's working well, except for a new remote call I just added that only fails when running with a release build. The same call works fine when running on the device (iPhone) using debug build. When running with a release build, the result handler is never called (nor is the fault handler called). Viewing the BlazeDS logs in debug mode, the call is received and send back with data. I've narrowed it down to what seems to be a data size issue.
I have targeted one specific data call that returns in the String value a string length of 44kb, which fails in the release build (result or fault handler never called), but the result handler is called as expected in debug build. When I do not populate the String value (in server side Java code) on the object (just set it empty string), the result handler is then called, and the object is returned (release build).
The custom object being returned in the call is a very a simple object, with getters/setters for simple types boolean, int, String, and one org.23c.dom.Document type. This same object type is used on other other RemoteObject calls (different data) and works fine (release and debug builds). I originally was returning as a Document, but, just to make sure this wasn't the problem, changed the value to be returned to a String, just to rule out XML/Dom issues in serialization.
I don't understand 1) why the release build vs. debug build behavior is different for a RemoteObject call, 2) why the calls work in debug build when sending over a somewhat large (but, not unreasonable) amount of data in a String object, but not in release build.
I have't tried to find out exactly where the failure point in size is, but, not sure that's even relevant, since 44kb isn't an unreasonable size to expect.
By turning on the Debug mode in BlazeDS, I can see the object and it's attributes being serialized and everything looks good there. The calls are received and processed appropriately in BlazeDS for both debug and release build testing.
Anyone have an idea on other things to try to debug/resolve this?
Platform testing is BlazeDS 4, Flashbuilder 4.7, Websphere 8 server, iPhone (iOS 7.1.2). Tried using multiple Flex SDK's 4.12 to the latest 4.13, with no change in behavior.
Thanks!

After a week's worth of debugging, I found the issue.
The Java type returned from the call was defined as ArrayList. Changing it to List resolved the problem.
I'm not sure why ArrayList isn't a valid return type, I've been looking at the Adobe docs, and still can't see why this isn't valid. And, why it works in Debug mode and not in Release build is even stranger. Maybe someone can shed some light on the logic here to me.

Error calling for web-service from BPEL

hello,
I'm getting an exception thrown when I try to call for a web service. Until yesterday it was fine, but since today we keep getting this error message:
<2006-05-29 21:02:03,635> <ERROR> <red.collaxa.cube>
<BaseCubeSessionBean::logError> Error while invoking bean "finder": Instance not found in datasource.
The process domain was unable to fetch the instance with key "c2c73aae36359a11:84cc09:10b7b50ebef:-7d45" from the datasource.
Please check that the instance key "c2c73aae36359a11:84cc09:10b7b50ebef:-7d45" refers to a valid instancet
hat has been started and not removed from the process domain.
ORABPEL-02152
Instance not found in datasource.
The process domain was unable to fetch the instance with key "c2c73aae36359a11:84cc09:10b7b50ebef:-7d45" from the datasource.
Please check that the instance key
"c2c73aae36359a11:84cc09:10b7b50ebef:-7d45" refers to a valid instance that has been started and not removed from the process domain.
at com.collaxa.cube.engine.data.AdminFinder.__lookupInstanceMetaData(AdminFinder.java:314)
at com.collaxa.cube.engine.data.AdminFinder.__lookupInstanceMetaData(AdminFinder.java:262)
at com.collaxa.cube.engine.data.AdminFinder.lookupInstanceByConversationId(AdminFinder.java:235)
at com.collaxa.cube.ejb.impl.FinderBean.lookupInstanceByConversationId(FinderBean.java:177)
at IFinderBean_StatelessSessionBeanWrapper42.lookupInstanceByConversationId(IFinderBean_StatelessSessionBeanWrapper42.java:669)
at com.oracle.bpel.client.Locator.lookupInstance(Locator.java:420)
at displayInstance.jspService(_displayInstance.java:111)
at com.orionserver.http.OrionHttpJspPage.service(OrionHttpJspPage.java:56)
at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspPageTable.service(JspPageTable.java:350)
at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.internalService(JspServlet.java:509)
at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:413)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
at com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:824)
at com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:330)
at com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forward(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:222)
at com.collaxa.cube.fe.DomainFilter.doFilter(DomainFilter.java:152)
at com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:663)
at com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:330)
at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:830)
at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(HttpRequestHandler.java:285)
at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(HttpRequestHandler.java:126)
at com.evermind.util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:192)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Any ideas how I can fix it?
Thanks.

Hi,
We've tried increasing the
<transaction-config timeout="60000" /> to 120000, and also tried increasing the syncMaxWaitTime from the console...
But nothing seems to help.
In addition, the test page of the web service we are invoking returns after 1 second (so there shouldn't be a latency problem)
Maybe you have any other ideas?

EJB 3.1 @Asynchronous and calling other methods from within

Hey all,
I am helping a friend set up a test framework, and I've turned him on to using JEE6 for the task. I am decently familiar with entity beans, session beans, and such. One of the new features is @Asynchronous, allowing a method to be ran on a separate thread. The test framework generally needs to spawn potentially 1000's of threads to simulate multiple users at once. Originally I was doing this using the Executor classes, but I've since learned that for some reason, spawning your own threads within a JEE container is "not allowed" or bad to do. I honestly don't quite know why this is.. from what I've read the main concern is that the container maintains threads and your own threads could mess up the container somehow. I can only guess that this might be possible if your threads use the container services in some way.. but if anyone could enlighten me on the details as to why this is bad, that would be great.
None the less, EJB 3.1 adds the async capability and I am now looking to use this. From my servlet I use @EJB to access the session bean, and call an async method. My servlet returns right away as it should. From the async method I do some work and using an entity bean store results, so I don't need to return a Future object. In fact, my ejb then makes an HttpClient call to another servlet to notify it that the result is ready.
My main question though, is if it's ok to call other methods from the async method that are not declared @Asynchronous. I presume it is ok, as the @Asynchronous just enables the container to spawn a thread to execute that method in. But I can't dig up any limitations on the code within an async method.. whether or not it has restrictions on the container services, is there anything wrong with using HttpClient to make a request from the method.. and making calls to helper methods within the bean that are not async.
Thanks.

851827 wrote:
Hey all,.. from what I've read the main concern is that the container maintains threads and your own threads could mess up the container somehow. I can only guess that this might be possible if your threads use the container services in some way.. but if anyone could enlighten me on the details as to why this is bad, that would be great.
Yes since the EE spec delegated thread management to conatiners, the container might assume that some info is available in the thread context that you may not have made available to your threads.
Also threading is a technical implementation detail and the drive with the EE spec is that you should concentrate on business requirements and let the container do the plumbing part.
If you were managing your own threads spawned from EJBs, you'd have to be managing your EJBs' lifecycle as well. This would just add to more plumbing code by the developer and typically requires writting platform specific routines which the containers already do anyway.
>
None the less, EJB 3.1 adds the async capability and I am now looking to use this. From my servlet I use @EJB to access the session bean, and call an async method. My servlet returns right away as it should. From the async method I do some work and using an entity bean store results, so I don't need to return a Future object. In fact, my ejb then makes an HttpClient call to another servlet to notify it that the result is ready.
My main question though, is if it's ok to call other methods from the async method that are not declared @Asynchronous. I presume it is ok, as the @Asynchronous just enables the container to spawn a thread to execute that method in. But I can't dig up any limitations on the code within an async method.. whether or not it has restrictions on the container services, is there anything wrong with using HttpClient to make a request from the method.. and making calls to helper methods within the bean that are not async.
Thanks.If you want to be asynchronous without caring about a return value then just use MDBs.
The async methods have no restrictions on container services and there is nothing wrong with calling other non async methods. Once the async method is reached those annotations don't matter anyway (unless if you call thhose methods from a new reference of the EJB that you look up) as they only make sense in a client context.
Why do you need to make the call to the servlet from the EJB? Makes it difficult to know who is the client here. Better use the Future objects and let the initial caller delegate to the other client components as needed.

BMP EJB Load and Store is calling only one time calling in a loop

Loop Iterating two times but ejb load and store is calling only one time.
Application deployed in 0c4j 10.1.2.0.0 container.

This sounds more like a Teststand quesstion. You might want to post it there.
Mike...
Certified Professional Instructor
Certified LabVIEW Architect
LabVIEW Champion
"... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

Discussion -- Call for answers : Class and Component

Dear all,
1. Component has a clear seperation between the specification and implementation? I can't understand here.The interface define some operations,but eventually we need coding to realize it. Where is the speration?
A class also has methods and coding to realize it. But why we never say a class has a seperation between the specification and implementation?
2. Component has interface; Java has interface. Are they the same idea or different?
Call for answers.
Thanks
Kevin

Hi, Kevin,
First of all, I need to clarify some terminologies and then try to anwser your questions.
(1) Interface only defines operations, but does not specifies how to implement those operations. In Java, abstract class and interface are interfaces. In CORBA, IDL is interface which can be implemented by differenct programming languages.
(2) Java class is both an interface and an implementation, because it not only defines operations, but also implements the operations.
(3) Component provides some specific functionalities, but is not a full-featured application. Usually, a full-featured application consists of many different components. A component can be large or small. A component can be as large as consisting of tens or hundreds of interfaces and classes, like EJB container and server. On the other hand, a component can be as small as comprising only one class; suppose you write a component to calculate foreign currancy conversion.
(4)Specification is a written document that tries to standardize the development of a large component. A specification specififies each party's responsibilities, such as application developers'responsibilities, vendor's responsibilities, administrtor's responsibilities and so on. Also, it specifies the contracts (interfaces) between each party. In doing so, a component can be made very reuseful and can be plug-in and play; changing different vendor's component without breaking application developer's owner code.
In Java world, you see a lot of specifications, such as JDBC, EJB and JMS. When SUN defines those specifications, they use Java interfaces rather other classes to specify interfaces. Here, clear seperation between interface and implementation is very important. (1) If a class is used to specify an interface, SUN must provide implementation for the class. But, the purpose of the specification to allow different vendors to provide implementation.(2) Implementation details can very complex and different vendors may implement the same component very differently. A specification only specifies interfaces but not the implementation. The implementation is up to the vendors. Any implementation is ok as long as they comply to the contracts (interfaces). For instance, one vendor may implement a specified interface using one class and another vendor may implement the same interface using three classes. If a class is used to specify an interface, you restrict vendors' implementation. Usually, in a specification, if you find a class that is used to defines an interface, it means that SUN will provide common implementation for it and vendors do not need to implement it.
In OO design and programing, clearly seperating interfaces from implementations is vital. We should program interface rather than program implementation.
Thanks.
Tommy

I am not able to get name of the person when he is calling for which i have already saved the no. on my contact list i have reseted my phone twice help me out

hello i have started using iphone 5 for which i downloaded my contacts from i clouds i am not able to get name of the person when he is calling for which i have already saved the no. on my contact list i have reseted my phone twice its only showing the names of the person whose no. i have saved it with the country code i am staying in india new delhi pls help me i am fed up not able to get the name of person who is calling

Sir, your Apple ID can be used as an iCloud account as well. They are both the same thing.
You can learn more from --> Set up your Apple ID for iCloud and iTunes - Apple Support

How to look for New start Called call for a Maintenance plan

Hi,
I need to find out all calls for a maintenance plan of scheduling type- 'New Start' and Status- 'Called'. How to find this using tables.
For 'New Start' scheduling type probably table field and value is MHIS-TERMA = 'N'. There are different statuse in this table but I am not able to identify the status 'called'. Also what is the field MHIS-ZAEHL(Maintenance package number) for?
Thanks,
Vimal

Taken from the standard IP10 program:
* possible status combinations
* TSABR - Scheduling status: planned date called
* TSVBT - Scheduling status: call outstanding
* TSENQ - Scheduling status: call horizon not reached
* TSENM - Scheduling status: stopped manually
* TSTAT - Sceduling status
* TSABR TSVBT TSENQ TSENM TSTAT
* X - - - A called with order
* X - - - - called without order
* - X X - - on hold (TSENQ), due (TSVBT)
* - X X - F on hold, due and fixed
* X - - - X skipped
* - X X X - blocked
* - X X X F blocked
* X - - - - LRMDT <> 0, completed

Flat File-to-RFC question, multiple RFC calls for one file.

Hi guys,
I'm quite new to XI / PI and I have a question regarding a File-to-RFC scenario we're trying in NW PI 7.1.
We have a flat file which has two lines with two fields each, let's take this as an example :
001,001
002,002
The files needs to be converted to XML and then transferred to the RFC program which will update a table with the values above.
In the ESR I've created 3 data types (z_row1,z_record1 and z_fileinput1), 1 message type (z_file2rfc_ob_mt), 1 message mapping (z_file2rfc_mm), 2 Service Interface (z_file2rfc_ob_si and z_file2rfc_ib_ztestpi) and 1 operation mapping (z_file2rfc_om).
In the Integration Builder (ID) I've created everything required (The sender and receiver communication channels, sender and receiver agreement, receiver determination and interface mapping).
We're also using content conversion to convert the flat file to XML, this does seem to work because I see all the lines/field in the message when it gets into PI. The problem is that the RFC can only accept two fields at a time and only the first line gets updated. I see that only the first line gets sent to the RFC.
How can I make the RFC call for each and every line ?
Thanks !!

Create the RFC with table, which takes multiple lineitem as input and update the table in single call.
If you want response back then call RFC as synchrounous else in Asynchrounous mode.
By doing this in single call it will update the complete table.
Gaurav Jain
Reward Points if answer is helpful

Found 0 results for My browser is missing important items, the whole tool bar...., drop down menu to print, copy, work off line, file, save, book mark, history. I just installed latest foxfire on windows xp. Found some instructions but they called for usi

Found 0 results for My browser is missing important items, the whole tool bar...., drop down menu to print, copy, work off line, file, save, book mark, history. I just installed latest foxfire on windows xp. Found some instructions but they called for using keys my computer doesn't have ( key in OSX There is no file, edit , history, help, tools, navigation, all the things your directions say to use. Also I always get hung up and the message a scrip is running. I don't know what thises scrips are but I sure don't need them.
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== I just noticed it. It probably happened when I upgraded foxfire.

'''Can't see the Menu Bar''' (File, Edit, View, History, Bookmarks, Tools, Help)?
Turning the Menu Bar on and off is a new feature in version 3.6.
''(Linux & OSX see: [[Menu bar is missing]] )''
''Windows'' Method 1. '''''Hold down''''' the key and press the following letters in this exact order: V T M
''Windows'' Method 2. Press and release the key. The Menu Bar will be displayed; then choose ~~red:V~~iew > ~~red:T~~oolbars and click on ~~red:M~~enu Bar.
The Menu Bar should now be displayed permanently, unless you turn it off again using View > Toolbars. Check mark = displayed, NO check mark = not displayed.
See: http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Menu+bar+is+missing
'''Navigation Toolbar, Bookmarks Toolbar and other Toolbars''' under View > Toolbars. Clicking on one of them will place a check mark (display) or remove the check mark (not displayed).
'''To display the Status Bar''', View, then click Status bar to place a check mark (display) or remove the check mark (not displayed).
'''Full Screen mode'''
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Netbooks#Full_screen
Also see:
''' [[Back and forward or other toolbar buttons are missing]]'''
'''[[Navigation Toolbar items]]'''

How do I log a support call for Pages with Apple?

Hello,
Sorry to have to ask this question here because I suspect it has been covered and I'm searching wrong. Anyway I'm on the Apple support site trying to log a call for some erratic behaviour when Pages tries to sync with iCloud. It seems that no matter what I end up having to enter the serial number of my hardware. Well first off this is a software issue and not a hardware issue - I've been to the Genius Bar and they believe it is Pages failing to sync with the iCloud. I have had both the iPad and the iPhone replaced during the issue and still the same problem. Secondly I have two devices affected by the same Pages behaviour
Ok so after going around in circles for quite some time and becoming quite frustrated I thought I would come here for some sane suggestions. The first of which I fully expect to be an explanation of how to log a software support call Is there anyone out there who can advise me on how to log my issue please?
Many thanks in advance,
Andy

Do what you did before and, in a second session, look at V$SESSION and other relevant dynamic performance views.

GetOutputStream() has already been called for this response

I have a problem with my servlet,
i compiled my code,it works normally but there is an error occured when it works.
The error is :
java.lang.IllegalStateException: getOutputStream() has already been called for this response
* at org.apache.catalina.connector.Response.getWriter(Response.java:607)*
* at org.apache.catalina.connector.ResponseFacade.getWriter(ResponseFacade.java:196)*
* at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspWriterImpl.initOut(JspWriterImpl.java:125)*
* at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspWriterImpl.flushBuffer(JspWriterImpl.java:118)*
* at org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.release(PageContextImpl.java:179)*
* at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.internalReleasePageContext(JspFactoryImpl.java:116)*
* at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspFactoryImpl.releasePageContext(JspFactoryImpl.java:76)*
* at org.apache.jsp.KaptchaExample_jsp._jspService(KaptchaExample_jsp.java:209)*
* at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:98)*
* at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:803)*
* at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:331)*
* at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:329)*
* at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:265)*
* at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:803)*
* at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:269)*
* at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:188)*
* at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:213)*
* at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:174)*
* at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127)*
* at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:117)*
* at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:108)*
* at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:174)*
* at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:874)*
* at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:665)*
* at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:528)*
* at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:81)*
* at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:689)*
* at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)*
here is my code :
Iterator iter = ImageIO.getImageWritersByFormatName(imageFormat);
* if( iter.hasNext() ) {*
* ImageWriter writer = (ImageWriter)iter.next();*
* ImageWriteParam iwp = writer.getDefaultWriteParam();*
* if ( imageFormat.equalsIgnoreCase("jpg") || imageFormat.equalsIgnoreCase("jpeg") ) {*
* iwp.setCompressionMode(ImageWriteParam.MODE_EXPLICIT);*
* iwp.setCompressionQuality(imageQuality);*
* //writer.setOutput(ImageIO.createImageOutputStream(response.getWriter()));*
* IIOImage imageIO = new IIOImage(bufferedImage, null, null);*
* writer.write(null, imageIO, iwp);*
* response.flushBuffer();*
please help me,would u give me a solutions for my problem..i really appreciate if you want to give a solution.
Regards,
Dany Fauzi

Actually the stack trace indicates the the error is happening in KaptchaExample.jsp, not in a Servlet. I'm guessing that the code you've presented is in a scriptlet (i.e. inside the JSP in <% %> brackets). This is altogether the wrong place for it. JSPs are purely for generating HTML and to try and generate image responses in one is doomed to failure. Write a servlet class to generate your image file. If you want to embed a dynamically generated image in an HTML page, then you need to generate HTML which accesses the Servlet through the <img src=... tag, i.e. the browser retrieves the image data as a separate transaction.
The immediate source of the crash is that the JSP already opened the output stream in order to write HTML output, so it's too late to try and open it for the writing of image data.

Maximum no. of calls for VGC

Hi All,
is there possible way to increase the Maximum number of call from 2 to more?
i tried to increase the maximum number but its getting me error, and the message says the maximum no. is just only 2..
can anybody help me?..
Thank you very much in advance..
Best Regards,
Lester

Hi Lester,
Unfortunately there is no way around this parameter :( You can configure up to 200 calls for a line on a device in a cluster, with the limiting factor being the device. As you configure the number of calls for one line, the calls available for another line decrease. Cisco IP Phones that support the multicall display (such as a Cisco IP Phone 7960) support up to 200 calls per DN and 2 calls per DN for non-multicall display devices (such as VGC Analog phone or Cisco IP Phone 7905). This is really due to the fact that there is no way to properly handle more than 2 calls at a time on these type of phones.
From this good doc;
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products_administration_guide_chapter09186a00801ec5a6.html#1062557
Hope this helps!
Rob

IPTComm 2010 Call for Papers: Deadline Extended

CALL FOR PAPERS: DEADLINE EXTENDED
4th ACM Conference on Principles, Systems and Applications of IP Telecommunications
IPTComm 2010
http://www.iptcomm.org
August 2-3, 2010
Leibniz Supercomputing Center
Munich, Germany
IMPORTANT DATES
================
Paper registration: Midnight, March 5, 2010.
Paper submission: Midnight March 19th, 2010 (Firm deadline).
Notification of acceptance: May 21st, 2010.
Final camera-ready submission: June 30th, 2010.
Conference dates: August 2-3, 2010.
The paper submission deadline has been extended to March 19, 2010.
However, authors are required to register with EDAS and submit
their paper abstract by the original deadline of Midnight March 5,
2010.
The IP communications domain has matured beyond providing VoIP only
services. Universities, enterprises, businesses and individual
consumers routinely use VoIP. The focus of IP communications is now on
the operations, management, administration and provisioning aspects of
large-scale, reliable and secure communication systems. To this extent,
the research and standardization work now includes log file analysis,
session tracing across proxy meshes and overload control. As IP
communications grapples with these issues, newer technologies in the
form of cloud-based IP communication systems; peer-to-peer VoIP
networks; use of IP communications in virtual worlds; social
networks and IP communications are starting to assert a strong
presence in the IP communications domain.
The aim of the IPTComm conference is to serve as a platform for
researchers from academia, research labs, industry and government to
share their ideas, views, results and experiences in the field of
IP-based telecommunication. IPTComm will include presentations of
theoretical and experimental achievements, innovative systems,
prototyping efforts, case studies, and advancements in technology.
We invite authors to submit papers in the following and related areas:
New services and service models
* Over-the-top services.
* Social networking and IP communications.
* IP telecommunications in virtual worlds.
* Compositional services and model checking.
* Cloud-based IP communications infrastructure.
* Rapid application development frameworks.
* APIs and enablers for IP communication services.
* Browser-based IP communication services.
* Context-aware communication services.
* IMS and NGN services.
Management and Resilience
* Advantages and disadvantages of IP communications as a P2P
application.
* Advances in P2P overlays for IP communications systems.
* Management of IP communications systems and networks.
* Overload management schemes for IP communications.
* Log files and log file analysis for IP communication systems.
* Scalability of large-scale IP communication systems.
* Traffic and QoS measurement of VoIP traffic.
* Self-tuning and self-monitoring IP communications systems.
* Service discovery.
* Energy consumption and energy management in IP communication
systems.
* Incentives in P2P IP communication systems.
* Resilience in P2P IP communication system.
Security
* Identity management for IP communications systems.
* Anonymity and privacy in IP communications.
* Forensics and diagnostics in IP communication systems.
* Techniques to detect, mitigate and prevent SPIT, phreaking
and vishing.
* Denial of service detection and prevention.
Mobile IP Communications
* Mobile IP communication services.
* Mobility in cloud-based IP communications infrastructure.
* Mobile P2P IP communication systems.
Miscellaneous
* The role of IP communications in the power grid.
* Open source development in IP communications.
* Research issues in vertical IP communication markets (e.g.,
privacy in the medical field, location in logistical
field, etc.)
* Regulatory issues in IP communications.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
==================
Papers submission is handled by EDAS (http://edas.info/N8459).
IPTComm solicits full papers up to 12 pages in length, in two-column
ACM conference format
(see http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates). All
submissions must describe original research, not published nor
currently under review for another conference or journal. The program
committee will referee all papers, and accepted papers will be
published in the conference proceedings. Papers will also be published in
the ACM Digital Library.
In 2010, IPTComm will be accepting short papers of at least 5 pages and
no more than 6 pages. The aim of the short paper category is to help
maintain a published record of work carried out as well as facilitate
future affiliations and foster collaborative work. Short papers are
subject to the same rigorous review process as full papers and follow
the same submission process, schedule and expectation of presentation as
the full papers.
IMPORTANT DATES
================
Paper registration: Midnight, March 5, 2010.
Paper submission: Midnight March 19th, 2010 (Firm deadline).
Notification of acceptance: May 21st, 2010.
Final camera-ready submission: June 30th, 2010.
Conference dates: August 2-3, 2010.
Conference Location: Leibniz Supercomputing Center, Munich, Germany.
CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS
====================
Georg Carle (Technical University of Munich)
Helmut Reiser (Leibniz Supercomputing Center)
TPC CO-CHAIRS
=============
Gonzalo Camarillo (Ericsson Research)
Vijay K. Gurbani (Bell Laboratories/Alcatel-Lucent)
DEMONSTRATION AND INDUSTRY TALKS CO-CHAIRS
==========================================
Carol Davids (Illinois Institute of Technology)
Saverio Niccolini (NEC Laboratories Europe)
PUBLICITY CHAIR
===============
Gregory Bond (AT&T Research)
Steering Committee
==================
Gregory Bond (AT&T Research)
Saverio Niccolini (NEC Laboratories Europe)
Henning Schulzrinne (Columbia University)
Dorgham Sisalem (Tekelec)
Radu State (University of Luxembourg)
TPC MEMBERS
===========
John Buford Avaya Labs Research
Eric Chen NTT Corporation
Eric Cheung AT&T Labs - Research
Tasos Dagiuklas Technological Educational Institute of Mesolonghi
Carol Davids Illinois Institute of Technology
Ali Fessi Technical University of Munich
Rosario Garroppo University of Pisa
Aniruddha Gokhale Vanderbilt University
Swapna Gokhale University of Connecticut
Carmen Guerrero University Carlos III of Madrid
Christian Hoene University of Tubingen
Alan Jeffrey Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
Cullen Jennings Cisco
Salvatore Loreto Ericsson
Jouni Maenpaa Ericsson
Enrico Marocco Telecom Italia
Joerg Ott Helsinki University of Technology
Victor Pascual Avila Acme Packets
Joachim Posegga University of Passau
Anand Prasad NEC Corporation
Yacine Rebahi Fraunhofer Institut Fokus, Berlin
Ivica Rimac Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
Ronaldo Salles Military Institute of Engineering (Brazil)
Stefano Salsano University of Rome "Tor Vergata"
Jan Seedorf NEC Europe Ltd.
Jose Solar Technical University of Denmark
Ivan Vidal University Carlos III of Madrid
Xiaotao Wu Avaya Labs Research
Pamela Zave AT&T Laboratories

Reminder: Our call for papers is closing on Monday 27th July. Be sure to send your abstracts to [[email protected]]
We also have a Twitter account and will be posting updates via that. Se sure to follow: aus_ora_spatial
Ross.

IPTComm 2010: Call for Papers

****** NOTE: Submissions due on Mar 5, 2010 *******
IPTCOMM 2010
============
The Fourth Conference on Principles, Systems and Applications of
IP Telecommunications
August 2 and 3, 2010
Leibniz Supercomputing Center
Munich, Germany
http://iptcomm.org
The IP communications domain has matured beyond providing VoIP only
services. Universities, enterprises, businesses and individual
consumers routinely use VoIP. The focus of IP communications is now on
the operations, management, administration and provisioning aspects of
large-scale, reliable and secure communication systems. To this extent,
the research and standardization work now includes log file analysis,
session tracing across proxy meshes and overload control. As IP
communications grapples with these issues, newer technologies in the
form of cloud-based IP communication systems; peer-to-peer VoIP
networks; use of IP communications in virtual worlds; social
networks and IP communications are starting to assert a strong
presence in the IP communications domain.
The aim of the IPTComm conference is to serve as a platform for
researchers from academia, research labs, industry and government to
share their ideas, views, results and experiences in the field of
IP-based telecommunication. IPTComm will include presentations of
theoretical and experimental achievements, innovative systems,
prototyping efforts, case studies, and advancements in technology.
We invite authors to submit papers in the following and related areas:
New services and service models
* Over-the-top services.
* Social networking and IP communications.
* IP telecommunications in virtual worlds.
* Compositional services and model checking.
* Cloud-based IP communications infrastructure.
* Rapid application development frameworks.
* APIs and enablers for IP communication services.
* Browser-based IP communication services.
* Context-aware communication services.
* IMS and NGN services.
Management and Resilience
* Advantages and disadvantages of IP communications as a P2P
application.
* Advances in P2P overlays for IP communications systems.
* Management of IP communications systems and networks.
* Overload management schemes for IP communications.
* Log files and log file analysis for IP communication systems.
* Scalability of large-scale IP communication systems.
* Traffic and QoS measurement of VoIP traffic.
* Self-tuning and self-monitoring IP communications systems.
* Service discovery.
* Energy consumption and energy management in IP communication
systems.
* Incentives in P2P IP communication systems.
* Resilience in P2P IP communication system.
Security
* Identity management for IP communications systems.
* Anonymity and privacy in IP communications.
* Forensics and diagnostics in IP communication systems.
* Techniques to detect, mitigate and prevent SPIT, phreaking
and vishing.
* Denial of service detection and prevention.
Mobile IP Communications
* Mobile IP communication services.
* Mobility in cloud-based IP communications infrastructure.
* Mobile P2P IP communication systems.
Miscellaneous
* The role of IP communications in the power grid.
* Open source development in IP communications.
* Research issues in vertical IP communication markets (e.g.,
privacy in the medical field, location in logistical
field, etc.)
* Regulatory issues in IP communications.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
==================
Papers submission is handled by EDAS (http://edas.info/N8459).
IPTComm solicits full papers up to 12 pages in length, in two-column
ACM conference format
(see http://www.acm.org/sigs/publications/proceedings-templates). All
submissions must describe original research, not published nor
currently under review for another conference or journal. The program
committee will referee all papers, and accepted papers will be
published in the conference proceedings. Pending cooperation agreements,
papers will also be published in the ACM Digital Library.
In 2010, IPTComm will be accepting short papers of at least 5 pages and
no more than 6 pages. The aim of the short paper category is to help
maintain a published record of work carried out as well as facilitate
future affiliations and foster collaborative work. Short papers are
subject to the same rigorous review process as full papers and follow
the same submission process, schedule and expectation of presentation as
the full papers.
IMPORTANT DATES
================
Paper submission: Midnight March 5th, 2010.
Notification of acceptance: May 21st, 2010.
Final camera-ready submission: June 30th, 2010.
Conference dates: August 2-3, 2010.
Conference Location: Leibniz Supercomputing Center, Munich, Germany.
CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS
====================
Georg Carle (Technical University of Munich)
Helmut Reiser (Leibniz Supercomputing Center)
TPC CO-CHAIRS
=============
Gonzalo Camarillo (Ericsson Research)
Vijay K. Gurbani (Bell Laboratories/Alcatel-Lucent)
DEMONSTRATION AND INDUSTRY TALKS CO-CHAIRS
==========================================
Carol Davids (Illinois Institute of Technology)
Saverio Niccolini (NEC Laboratories Europe)
PUBLICITY CHAIR
===============
Gregory Bond (AT&T Research)
Steering Committee
==================
Gregory Bond (AT&T Research)
Saverio Niccolini (NEC Laboratories Europe)
Henning Schulzrinne (Columbia University)
Dorgham Sisalem (Tekelec)
Radu State (University of Luxembourg)
TPC MEMBERS
===========
John Buford Avaya Labs Research
Eric Chen NTT Corporation
Eric Cheung AT&T Labs - Research
Tasos Dagiuklas Technological Educational Institute of Mesolonghi
Carol Davids Illinois Institute of Technology
Ali Fessi Technical University of Munich
Rosario Garroppo University of Pisa
Aniruddha Gokhale Vanderbilt University
Swapna Gokhale University of Connecticut
Carmen Guerrero University Carlos III of Madrid
Christian Hoene University of Tubingen
Alan Jeffrey Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
Cullen Jennings Cisco
Salvatore Loreto Ericsson
Jouni Maenpaa Ericsson
Enrico Marocco Telecom Italia
Joerg Ott Helsinki University of Technology
Victor Pascual Avila Acme Packets
Joachim Posegga University of Passau
Anand Prasad NEC Corporation
Yacine Rebahi Fraunhofer Institut Fokus, Berlin
Ivica Rimac Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
Ronaldo Salles Military Institute of Engineering (Brazil)
Stefano Salsano University of Rome "Tor Vergata"
Jan Seedorf NEC Europe Ltd.
Jose Solar Technical University of Denmark
Ivan Vidal University Carlos III of Madrid
Xiaotao Wu Avaya Labs Research
Pamela Zave AT&T Laboratories

Reminder: Our call for papers is closing on Monday 27th July. Be sure to send your abstracts to [[email protected]]
We also have a Twitter account and will be posting updates via that. Se sure to follow: aus_ora_spatial
Ross.

Ejb param serialization, is readResolve called for Externalizable param?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for