Elements 4 Intensität

Hallo,
Ich hatte bis jetzt schon viele verschieden Bildbearbeitungsprogramme. Nun bin ich auf Phot Shop Elements 4.0 umgestiegen! Leider finde ich dort eine für mich sehr wichtige Option nicht. Bei allen anderen Programmen konnte man Helligkeit/Kontrast und Intensität einstellen! Bei Elements 4.0 fehlt dieser Punkt! Kann mir jemand bitte helfen? Wie erziele ich den selben Effekt oder wo finde ich diese Option? :(
mfG

Hallo Patrick22,
im Editor Menü Überarbeiten => Beleuchtung anpassen => Helligkeit und Kontrast.
Empfehlenswerter sind aber die beiden anderen Punkte. Zuerst die Tonwertkorrektur verwenden und bei Bedarf Tiefen/Lichter. Zum Schluss vielleicht noch ganz wenig Kontrast (unter 10). Möglichst niemals dort Helligkeit verwenden - das macht man in der Tonwertkorrektur mit dem mittleren grauen Dreieck.
Grüße
Matthias
www.wertvolleswissen.de

Similar Messages

How do you update an intensity plot one element at a time?

I would like to use an intensity plot (or other control) to plot data collected from A/D channels. How do you get the Intensity plot to update one element at a time vs. row by row? Tips and suggestions greatly appreciated!

> I would like to use an intensity plot (or other control) to plot data
> collected from A/D channels. How do you get the Intensity plot to
> update one element at a time vs. row by row? Tips and suggestions
> greatly appreciated!
>
You will need to use the intensity graph and keep the buffer yourself.
Init the data with background values and start filling then in using
Replace Array subset. Presumably you are in a loop. Recirculate the
data in a shift register adding new data each iteration and plotting the
array to the intensity graph.
Once you get to the horizontal edge, you need to decide if you split the
data to get rid of the first row and append a new background row to the
end making a strip chart, or do you clear the array and start over from
the initial edge again making a scope chart, or do you mod the index
with the buffer size and erase a row at a time in advance making a sweep
chart.
To update the scales, you don't have to change the data. Just write to
the Offset property each time you scroll and it will relabel the data
with 0 mapping to the offset value.
Greg McKaskle

Is Premiere Elements 11 compatible with Blackmagic Intensity Shuttle USB 3.0 ?

I have an Intensity Shuttle from Blackmagic to Capture Video and Audio through USB 3.0
Is this divice compatible with Premiere Elements 11 ?
Thank you for your help

Looking at the Blackmagic Intensity Web site for host program interaction, I only see PrPro, and not PrE. Sometimes, that does not mean that PrE cannot use a device, but often it does. http://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/intensity/software/
I would contact Blackmagic and inquire.
I see that the card/device includes Blackmagic's Media Express, so it might be a simple workaround - Capture in Media Express, then Import that/those file(s) into PrE.
Please report BM's response.
Good luck,
Hunt

Image processing from .txt file onto an intensity graph

I am doing a mini project in my class and I was wondering if anyone could help me. It about image processing but I am bit stuck.
Heres the idea:
"An image is really nothing more than a 2D array of data. The value of every element in the array corresponds to the brightness of the image at that point.
In this project you will create a VI which loads a 2D array of data and then displays it on the screen using the Intensity Graph. Three example files (boats.txt, gordon.txt and parrot.txt) are available on the module webpage that you can use. However, you can also use any other black and white image you like, but will need to convert it to a “text image” first. To do this you can use some software called “ImageJ” which is available on the computers and is free to download.
You can vary the brightness of an image by adding the same value to every element in the array.
The contrast of an image is adjusted by multiplying every element in the array by the same value. Using numerical controls and simple array mathematics, you should adjust the brightness and contrast of your displayed image.
Some other ideas that you could try with image manipulation are:
o Invert an image (change black to white and white to black)"
First I am having problems putting my picture onto the graph. It is in the write file but the colours are not correct and the image has rotated 90 degrees. I will upload my VI so far when I get back onto my computer.
Would really appricate the help! Thank you for reading

Hi charlthedancer,
Here is an example to get you started.
Kind regards,
GajanS
Attachments:
Test.vi ‏14 KB

"How do I move my Elements to a new computer?"

This means if they tell you about installing not just the program but the files and any sort of database it requires as well.
Typically in a database there are two ways of moving files to another machine.
1. Simply copy the files from one location on the old machine to the same location on the new machine.
What this would mean to Carbonite was that you simply make sure all the files that are in that location are backed up and this is done when you run the restore. The key part is making sure you get the exact file locations from them not just the rough idea of what you need such as "back up the data folder located within your documents folder" not "you back up your adobe data folder." We have to know exactly what they are talking about to make sure that we have the right files.
2. Some files are a bit more complex and require an export or backup step before going to a new machine. In that step the files are packaged by the program that uses them in such a way that all the data needed in included in that one area and in such a way that a clean install on another computer knows how to import or restore them.
If this process is required then you are going to want to be periodically backing up or exporting the data within the Elements program and then backing up the files created by that process with Carbonite. This can be time consuming and makes backing up a lot more labor intensive but is unfortunately required by some things.

http://helpx.adobe.com/photoshop-elements/kb/backup-restore-move-catalog-photoshop.html

Error in file export when order of elements in build array changes

Hi everyone,
A while ago I wrote a vi file which does the following:
At first it initializes a camera and chooses a region of interest (ROI). Data out of the ROI will be discarded.
Then it raster scans a motor stage in x and y direction, in bidirectional mode (meaning that x alternates between scanning from left to right and right to left as y is inreased).
For each point of the scan, the spectrum is collected, which is then integrated in lambda to give an idea of the total intensity.
Then the intensity is plotted, along with the spectrum at each point.
The final results are exported in a text file.
The problem:
If I flip the order of the wires in the "build array" before the file export, placing the Total Count (intensity) wire in place of the Spectrum wire, the file export fails. What I mean by "fails" is that the .txt file contains characters that look like chinese!
Why is that?
I attach my .vi as well as two screenshots which demostrate the problem.
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
correct.png ‏182 KB
Wrong.png ‏180 KB
1.7z ‏119 KB

mikeporter wrote:
Hey Jeff... The changes you recommend are all good (and necessary) but the thing I'm stuck on is that regardless of what happens to the floating point data, there's that built-in VI that changes it to string representations of the numbers. And as I understand it, that is where the problem is.
Mike...
PS: Coming to NI Week?
Not this year
What scared me was the sgls on a SLs with no wire branch to force a data copy which, would force LabVIEW to preserve the sgls since the SL might need to be used again then, they get all mixed up building arrary out of mixed coerced sgls and dbls. With the potential of a miss-reussed buffer (not uncommon in 2011) confusing the string operations in the write to spreadsheet. The problem of course, must exist outside of write to spreadsheet file since it only exhibits with a build array element order change. Or, we all are halucinating (Possible alternate theory)
Jeff

Photoshop Elements 11 Organizer: Full screen view of lower quality than with PSE 10 and before?!

Upgrading from PSE 10 to 11, I noticed that when I watch my images with the organizer in PSE 11 in full screen view mode (F11), while the images load faster, they are shown in a lower quality than in PSE 10 or any other version of PSE that I owned before. In PSE 11, after the initial viewing in full screen (in the "fit screen" mode), when I click with the mouse on an image to display the "100%" view, there is a delay and the program says "Loading...", after which the 100% view in the full screen mode appears. When I then click another time with the mouse on the image to get back to "fit screen" mode, I get an image of better quality than during the initial view!
So it seems like the program first gives a faster, but lower quality view of the image in full screen mode, and only after the user requests a 100% view, it actually loads the image with full detail, which is then preserved when going back to the "fit screen" view. This is a serious issue for me, because I also use PSE organizer to present my pictures to other people, and I don't want to show them some lower quality versions of my images, but the full quality ones, without having to first choose "100% view" and then go back to "fit screen".
How can I make the PSE 11 organizer give me a full-quality full screen image right away, as this used to be the case in PSE10 and before?
(I have both versions, PSE 11 and PSE 10, now on the same computer and tested this to confirm that the PSE 11 initial full screen view is of lower quality than the PSE 10 one. Also in PSE 10, there is practically no delay for displaying the "100%" view afterwards, indicating that the image was loaded with full detail right away.)

- Update:
* Adobe's senior support level has replied to me about this issue as follows:
"Thank you for contacting Adobe.
When you press the F11 button, Organizer 11 uses the Bicubic
interpolation mainly because it is less processor intensive compared to
Bicubic Sharper, and it helps to create the preview on the fly, rather
than based on the thumbnail cache.
When you zoom out from the 100% view, Elements Organizer uses Bicubic
Sharper. This is because Bicubic Sharper is used for image reduction, so
if the 100% view is larger than the available screen space, it will need
to shrink. The Bicubic Sharper images may look more crisp however, Like
any sharpening algorithm, Bicubic Sharper introduces halos and
edge-enhancement artifacts. Those halos are typically slight, but any
further sharpening (which you'll need when preparing an image for print,
for example) will exaggerate them.This is expected behavior. The
Organizer isn't great for determining exact quality, I recommend you to
use Elements Editor for this purpose.
Thank you,
Bobby Johnson,
Adobe Technical Support."
* My reply on this to Adobe is:
"Hello Bobby,
thank you for your reply. Now at least we are talking about the same thing.
Why I am wondering about the choice to use the "Bicubic" algorithm when pressing F11 in PSE 11 is that all previous versions of PSE that I owned (which spans from PSE 6 to PSE 10) did use the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm right away when pressing F11. So apparently Adobe didn't worry about processor intensity of this algorithm then, and computers are getting all the time more powerful.
It is true that in some situations, the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm may introduce halos and edge-enhancement artifacts, as you write. On the other hand, especially on smaller resolution screens, the results of the "Bicubic Sharper" algorithm may look more crisp and lively, while the ones of the "Bicubic" algorithm may look more flat and lack fine detail. This is not only my personal opinion, but as I have brought up this topic in several forums, I can see that I am not alone here.
So assuming that the question about preferring "Bicubic Sharper" or "Bicubic" as a default algorithm when pressing F11 is partly a matter of taste, and partly a matter of the hardware the user has available, why can Abobe not give the user an option to choose which one he/she would prefer? For instance, F11 gives full screen view with "Bicubic" applied, and CTRL+F11 with "Bicubic sharper"? Or make this an option in the preferences?
As I am using the PSE organizer also to present pictures to other people (and I know many people who use it that way too), I would like to show them my pictures as sharp and detail-rich as possible. Therefore, I would highly appreciate an option as described above to be implemented in the PSE 11 organizer via an update. It should be fairly easy from a programming point of view, since both algorithms are already contained in the program anyway."
* If you support this suggestion of mine as stated above, please also contact Adobe accordingly! The more support requests they get for this, the more likely it is that they will implement this update! You may mention my case number 0184046323 for reference.

Adobe Premiere Elements 7 With Worthless Error Messages.

I have been a programmer since 1984, and if I saw a programmer in my team wrote these worthless error messages, I would go into my office and kill myself.
I Googled them, and I found them discussed; but the responses were of no use to me, mostly.
1. The error message I got that brought me to the edge of a cliff is: "Sorry, a serious error has occurred that require Adobe Premiere Elements to shutdown. We will attempt to save your current project."
Then it crashed.
When I was taking Operating Systems in my computer science class, a crash means you will get no more than 60 (out of 100). At IBM, a crash is always a SEVerity 1 issue. There is no way around it. Crash means the program is worthless.
I Googled it, and Adobe suggested it could be some drivers using virtual audio. I uninstalled everything I could find, and this problem is not going away. I looked at the sound device configuration, and it's using physical audio, not virtual audio.
I uninstalled Premiere Elements 7 five times and reinstalled them. They still failed. Finally, I reinstalled it at a different location, and it managed to "Found default catalog. Trying to open the default catalog." Then crashed.
If I wanted to use the default catalog, I would have said so. If I knew where they are, I would have set them on fire.
Anyway, I have a project due this afternoon, and I am stuck with these worthless Adobe Premiere Elements 7 error messages. No wonder Steve Jobs banned Adobe Flash. They are pretty worthless.
Sorry I am so upset, because none of you need to read my frustration; but I am up to my neck with Adobe. Once I get my project done, and I am switching to SONY Vegas.
But, for now, would someone tell me how to get rid of these problems so I can get the video edited? Thank you.

I noticed these errors were reported years ago, and Adobe has done NOTHING to improve it.
Go back to my little list of how problems, crashes and errors sort out. That was how it was way back with Premiere programs, and how it still sorts out.
Even the patch for PrE 8 was mainly to get it functioning with nVidia and ATI graphics cards. Yes, those "fixes" probably straddle the line between Bugs and system, with a nod towards Bugs. I know that Adobe takes their Bugs very seriously, and work overtime trying to find fixes for those, that do exist. Though it took a bit of time, as they gathered info, still Adobe had a patch, and that is rare for PrElements, due to the normal lifespan of that program.
I provide some of the same answers today, that I did years ago, to fix the problems. In nearly every case, things sort out per that list. As "system" is both #1 and is also by far the largest segment of causes, that is where I begin looking. With PC's, there are myriad configurations, and most are not suited for video editing. Too many load up their e-machine and expect to edit HD material. Obviously, that is not the case here, but there could still be equipment incompatibilities, or just some tweaking needed. I see similar in the PrPro forum, as the Mac-users put the program on their MacBook Pros, with one tiny HDD, and a very weak CPU, and things go horribly wrong. If PrE was ported for the Mac, we'd have the same issues here. Usually, my first question will be about the I/O sub-system, i.e. the HDD's, their size, speed, free space, controller type and how they are allocated. Video editing is highly I/O intensive, and most computers are not even close to being able to efficiently handle it. I recommend a minimum of 3x SATA, physical HDD's, and suggest that they be setup to spread the I/O workload over all three. Some manage with a 2x I/O, but that is below MY minimum, and is the real minimum from Adobe. A single HDD I/O is just going to cause bottlenecks, and there is no way around that.
Once, it was more the domain of the PC, that one had system issues, as Mac's were so limited and controlled. Now, as they have gained the ability to expand beyond the absolute control of Apple, those users are finding out that systems DO matter.
Notice #2 - Assets. Not all AV material is meant to be edited. Some, like AVCHD (a consumer format) will require a pro-level computer, just to get smooth playback! The second most common issue is trying to edit material that has something like the Xvid, or DivX CODEC.
Number 3 - Project, is very important too. One must match their Project Preset to their source footage. If not, then there will be problems. The failure to do this match is one of the biggest causes of issues, though usually not crashes, or hangs.
Number 4 - OE, is when a user decides to push a button, and expects something else to happen, and often because that's how it worked in another program. Many argue with me that #2 and #3 are OE too, but I am much more lenient, than they are.
Then, there ARE the Bugs. PrPro CS4 had a bunch. CS4.1 fixed a few, but broke some other things. It was not until CS4.2, that things got corrected, mostly, with that version. Then, CS5 hit, and seems quite good, but has a few Bugs too. Some were left over from CS4. A new update for CS5 is coming, and soon. Will it also fix those lingering Bugs? Only time will tell. Will it be a perfect program? Doubtful, but I'll bet that it'll be a "better" program.
Think back to when you started programming. You were writing apps. for the majority of the install-base. However, what happened if the user had Extended Memory? What happened if they had Expanded Memory? What happened if they had both, and a software manager to handle those? Most still had 640KB. By that time, I had 2GB, though my MoBo could only handle 1GB with the managers. How could you write for me? I was 1:1000000, or maybe even less. I had to do my programming on the fly, and often had boot discs for different programs. It's not that much different now, except that I would not be such a rarity any more, but hardly mainstream.
I'll bet that we can sort much out, by tackling the "Big 3," and then working down, if necessary.
I like doing test Projects, keeping things simple, and testing as we make them more complex. That helps isolate the issues in most cases. In another thread, the poor user says that all Project Presets, all formats and all Export setting yield issues. My first thought is to isolate on one Project Preset, one set of Assets, and see if it's a system issue.
Sometimes it's easy, and that is good, 'cause the user gets to editing and not fritzing so much. Just nailed one in Encore, but the poster gave me all the data necessary, and my memory did not fail me (maybe it was not "wine-thirty yet?). One post, and one correct answer. Life is good. Sometimes, it takes days, and many posts, to narrow things down. In but a few, there is an answer. In those (like the PGC error in Encore) one never does really solve the issue, and the only hope is to get the OP to start over, do everything by the book, and hope for the best, this time around.
Good luck, and be assured - I do feel your pain. If I have not had one of THOSE error messages, believe me, I have read of them too many times.
Hunt

Am very frustrated with Photoshop Elements 8.0 & Premier Elements 8.0

Made my first slide show several years ago on older version of Elements. Worked real easy and in no time at all, had a nice slide show. Even set to music. By the next time I went to make a show, had upgraded to 8.0. I put the slides together, and as soon as I attempted to add music, I began to have issues. The slide show playing, but not the music, starting to play appropriately, and then losing the music, and if I attempt to pause, the program feezes, and have to do ctrl, alt delete. I also then purchased Priemere elements 8.0. Main reason was to be able to output to DVD instead of VCD( not everyone I wanted to share with could play my VCD's). After much frustration, got the show together, and sent to Priemere. The show did not play normally in Priemere either. Although the music played. The encoding process took extremely long, 6-8 hours for a 9 minute show. The next show I did, when I sent to Priemere, some slides were turned on there sides, couldn't find how to fix without going back into Photoshop slide show creator and resizing those pics. Many hours with much frustration again a very long time to get it to DVD. Today I give it one more shot. Dsigned a 7 minute show in slide show creator, Added one song. Music never played, but slides moved along OK. if I tried to pause or stop, Photoshop would freeze. Even tried turning off screen saver. So, sent to Priemere. Music played fine, but slides do not progress appropriately. If I stop and pause, it will readjust to the time of the music and can begin again, but 2 or so slides, and freezes again despite music playing on. Am using a computer with AMD 64 Athalon dual core processor 3800+ 2.01 GHz, 2.00GB of RAM, using Windows xp. Have check processer usage in the past, always seems to have plenty more room. I otherwise don't know much computer language as far as the operating of the system. However, I am ready to ditch both programs for something which doesn't have issues everytime I try to use it.

I’m not seeing these issues although I’m using PSE9/PRE9 but I always add the audio in PRE and then use yhe sound mixer. I’m wondering whether your system has sufficient RAM as 2gb is quite low by today’s standards and video rendering is quite CPU intensive.
I think there are a lot more output options with PRE9 including the h.264 codec for HD video playback on YouTube and iPhone. It might be worth considering if you ever intend to upgrade your system although you can of course try out the free trial.

Elements 10, Camera Raw 6.7: no colour space choices

Newbie alert!
I'm no expert on Photoshop or Camera Raw, but I read everywhere that I should be able to change the colour space of the Camera Raw output. At the moment I can only get the default which is sRGB but I want Adobe.
There's a little camera gizmo titled "Camera Calibration" underneath the histogram, but it's not there.
I've read that there should be some control in the middle beneath the preview but there's nothing there either.
Is this hobbled in Elements?
Thanks,
Keith

ElephantSandwich wrote:
Thanks for the reply: I'm aware I can set the colour space in the editor but my concern is that if it's exported from Camera Raw as sRGB then converted to AdobeRGB that there may be some information loss, my thinking being that getting it right early is better than later. Am I right in thinking that converting from sRGB to ARGB will lose information, or more likely won't have the full information set in the first place because the initial export from RAW is to sRGB?
I have to say I find the subject of colour management quite mystifying ... but I gather I'm not alone in that.
Thanks again.
Keeping in mind that a raw file has no color profile (it's not even an 'image', it's a recording of light intensity for each of the photosites laid out in a 'Bayer pattern' with Red, Green and blue filters) and that your raw file information will never be altered by any converter, you can be sure that it is always possible to re-process the raw file to aRGB without any information loss.
You are perfectly right that the resulting image (psd, tiff, jpeg...) when you save from the editor will keep its color profile and that converting sRGB to aRGB won't add any useful information; that's what I said in the other post.
When I was experimenting on that matter with other users in another forum, I was able to select previously edited raw files containing subtle tones in green/cyan and re-process them in aRGB instead of sRGB and I got better results on my 6-inks home printer.
Don't believe all images will be better in aRGB, there are not necessarily 'out of gamut' colours in all of your pictures.
Edit
I just realized that I have missed to put the link to the other thread:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4619442#4619442

Is Framemaker a better option than InDesign for footnote-intensive reports?

We currently used InDesign to layout our reports and briefings, and are exploring it's XML capabilities with a view to output in multiple formats: high-res PDFs, web pages within our CMS, and e-Pubs. We are unable to tag our hyperlinked footnotes for XML output in InDesign, and wondered if Framemaker would be a better tool. Our layouts are in colour, in a 2-column format, contain charts and tables and occasional exhibits, and we adhere to a strict template with both paragraph and character styles.
Any direction or insights would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Andrea

Andrea,
Your sample does not look like being »foot-intensive«, I only find two footnotes. And those will not be a problem for FrameMaker.
For 2-column text layout FrameMaker (as InDesign) gives you the option to create one text frame set to have two columns, or create two connected text frames, each of them one column. To keep the footnote in the original column, you would use the latter method. More information can be found in the online help:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/framemaker/using/WS6C3D24E6-2965-48bb-B6CF-50D1439AEB01.html
Regarding other elements of the sample pages I don’t see any stumbling blocks. Just be aware that the general approach to layout, and especially when using XML-structured documents, is completely different from InDesign. With InDesign you just move all the frames wherever and whenever you want. With FrameMaker you plan ahead, create master pages and paragraph styles and then follow this original design. Creating layout changes »on the fly« is just not the way you work in FrameMaker. But this limitation is the reason for a higher layout consistency.
- Michael

My Photoshop Elements 12 is impossibly slow, images do not load in the gallery unless clicked on making it difficult to create albums.

I am using a Windows, fast processing computer. I use it for drafting and other intensive programs but Elements seems to freeze and take forever to load content. Any way to fix this?

Hi,
Before we get the sledgehammer out, try repairing and optimizing your catalog.
Load the organizer
From the File menu, select Manage Catalogs - that should open the Catalog Manager.
Select you current catalog and click on the Repair button
When that has finished, click on the Optimize button
When that is done, click on the Cancel button to close the Catalog Manager.
Approximately how many images are in your catalog?
Brian

Change colors of individual pixels on intensity graph?

I would like to be able to change the color of a set of individual pixels within an intensity graph, to blue for example, while leaving the color table otherwise as is, for example, gray scale. The change to blue would be based on location, not on current gray value. I think I can accomplish this using the mask fx with picture controls, and then convert to intensity graph. Is there a more direct way? A good example to demonstrate this capability would be just using a 'mouse down' event on an intensity graph to change the color at the mouse location. Any thoughts are appreciated.
Sincerely,
Don

Yes, seems to work fine .
If you have LabVIEW 8.0, there is another possibility. There is a new property that allows drawing any pictures or picture elements on your graph area. Of course you could draw individual pixels, but nothing prevents you from e.g. drawing circles, squares, odd shaped areas, arrows or event text. ... Anything you could do with a plain picture indicator. One example that ships with LabVIEW 8.0 is Envelope.vi, see image.
Message Edited by altenbach on 06-12-2006 07:31 PM
LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .
Attachments:
envelope.png ‏32 KB

Dynamically controling the size (in pixels) of array elements?

Hey Everyone,
I am writing a large vi where front panel space is becoming a limitation. One of the elements that I want to display is a 2-D array of boolean indicators (rectangular LEDs). Is there any way to dynamically resize the elements in the array so that regardless of the number of elements, the entire array is always visible and has a constant footprint. For example, say the array is 8 x 8 elements, and takes up 160x160 pixels on the front panel so each element is roughly 20x20 pixels. Then the number of elements shifts to 4x4. I want the display to stay 160x160 pixels, but the size of each element to double to 40x40 pixels. Is this possible?
Thanks all,
Matt
Solved!
Go to Solution.

So thank you for two great ideas/examples. Definitely think I have a couple of very workable approaches. I have a follow on question about using the intensity graph approach.
First some background. This indicator is going to show the progress of a sorting operation, 1-4 copies of 1-8 unique items are being sorted into 1-32 containers. The items arrive at the sorter in random order, are identified, and then placed into the container where they are still needed. The point of this indicator is to show the user, at a glance, how full each container is andwhich componenets are missing. I want the elements (columns) to appear different for the unique items, which I know you can't do in an array of booleans. So I had already dumped the boolean approach for an array of colorboxes, and it was the color boxes that I was trying to dynamically size. There is still a boolean array to keep track of if an item has arrived, but that array drives the array of colorboxes where each type of item is color coded by assigning a gray value to colorbox for false, and a particular color if true. See attached, which works pretty well (detailed adjusts will make it just right).
I think the intensity graph will look much nicer though, so here is the question:
How do I map the different colors onto the intensity graph so it looks like the colorbox array without the lines? The attached get vi puts out a different value for each yes/no, which is to say I already know how to take the boolean and convert the 1 state to a unique number, what I don't know how to do is map that number into a particular color on the intensity graph.
Thanks guys.
Super helpful as always!
Matt
Attachments:
Puzzle_MM.vi ‏42 KB

SAPSCRIPT problem - skipping lines in an element

Hello,
I am having a weird problem with a SAPSCRIPT form that it is not executing an ELEMENT(/E) completely. When I debug it, I clearly see executimg only the first line and then it skips the rest of the code. I have ensured that I do not have any ENDIF's missing or any syntax errors. I also changed in the ABAP program(print program) to use another ELEMENT and it is also skipping the second and subsequent lines. I am not sure if it a problem with the print program or the SAPScript form.
Here is my ABAP code:
Init the barcode window
            CALL FUNCTION 'WRITE_FORM'
            EXPORTING
              window = 'BARCODE'
              element = 'INIT_BARCODE'
            EXCEPTIONS
              window = 1
              element = 2.
Here is my SAPScript code:
/E INIT_BARCODE
/: DEFINE &G_XPOS1& = &ZBAR-G_XPOS1&
/: DEFINE &G_XPOS2& = &ZBAR-G_XPOS2&
/: DEFINE &G_XPOS3& = &ZBAR-G_XPOS3&
/: DEFINE &G_XPOS4& = &ZBAR-G_XPOS4&
/* Print startcode
/: POSITION XORIGIN '0.2' CM YORIGIN '28.4' CM
/: IF &Y2OF5-C01& = '1'
/: BOX XPOS &G_XPOS1& TW WIDTH 0 TW HEIGHT 6 MM FRAME 8 TW INTENSITY 100
/: ENDIF
/: IF &Y2OF5-C02& = '1'
/: BOX XPOS &G_XPOS2& TW WIDTH 0 TW HEIGHT 6 MM FRAME 8 TW INTENSITY 10
/: ENDIF
/: IF &Y2OF5-C03& = '1'
/: BOX XPOS &G_XPOS3& TW WIDTH 0 TW HEIGHT 6 MM FRAME 8 TW INTENSITY 10
/: ENDIF
/: IF &Y2OF5-C04& = '1'
/: BOX XPOS &G_XPOS4& TW WIDTH 0 TW HEIGHT 6 MM FRAME 8 TW INTENSITY 100
/: ENDIF
Any ideas on this problem?
Thanks,
Nick F.

Yes, you are correct. I fixed the definition that I had an error and it is as follow:
TABLES: j_1ai02, y2of5, zbar.
DATA:
      g_xpos1(4) TYPE n,
      g_xpos2(4) TYPE n,
      g_xpos3(4) TYPE n,
      g_xpos4(4) TYPE n,
      g_xpos5(4) TYPE n,
      g_xpos6(4) TYPE n,
      g_xpos7(4) TYPE n,
      g_xpos8(4) TYPE n,
      g_xpos9(4) TYPE n,
      g_xpos10(4) TYPE n,
      g_xpos11(4) TYPE n,
      g_xpos12(4) TYPE n,
      g_xpos13(4) TYPE n,
      g_xpos14(4) TYPE n,
      g_tw_esp(2) TYPE n.   "TYPE i VALUE 12.
DATA: w_n        TYPE i,
      w_digitos TYPE i,
      w_resto    TYPE i,
      w_pos      TYPE i,
      w_nro(2)   TYPE n,
      w_barcode(44) TYPE n.
But, I am still getting the warning in the SE71 check and skipping the lines of the ELEMENT section...

Elements 4 Intensität

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for