Email id input field not appearing in MK02 while doing recording in SHDB

Hello All,
I am doing a BDC recording for MK02.It is not displaying the email id input field present in the contact persons section.Please let me know a solution.We are on ECC 6.
Thanks,
Rakesh.

Hi
Please tick 'Not a batch input session' in Recording Parameters while recording using SHDB.
Regards
Sathar
Edited by: Sathar RA on Apr 3, 2009 11:25 AM

Similar Messages

SHCess field not appearing after using utilization tab in excise invoice

Dear All,
SHCess field not appearing after using utilization tab in excise invoice.The other fields and values releated to SHCess are appearing.
Please give the inputs.
Regards,
deepti

issue resolved

ITEM IS NOT RELEVANT FOR BILLING WHILE DOING STO (VF01)

HI
I am getting an error while doing STO in CIN
Item is not relevant for billing while doing VF01 STO proforma invoice JEX with delivery document type NL and item category NLN
I searched the forum but not able to get an appropriate solution for this.
Kindly revert me on the same
Regards
MANOJ

Hi Manoj,
The only reason for the error you are encountering are,
A. The item category missing at the item level in the copying controls from delivery to JEX (billing type)
Kindly check throughly and confirm,
If it is there , then delete the configuration , i.e. item category from the copying controls and do it again.. Even if this do not resolve your issue, ask your technical team to debugg the billing document during creation and check.

Storage Location field not appearing in Mat Doc.

Dear All,
While doing GR 105 for PO, the Storage Location Field is not appearing in Mat Doc. Moreover, the TO is not getting created immediately while saving the Mat Doc. I don't know why this is happening?
The material has both Qty/Value Updation ticked and all other related configuration is perfect like Mvt. Types/Ref. Mvt. Types etc.
Please help to resolve.
Regards
Samier Danish

Dear rksap7284,
Thanks for your inputs. As I already mentioned confirguartion is perfect yet there is no St. Loc. field being displayed while Mvt. type. 105. I'll provide more information as below:
- PO has Acct. ***. Cat as "P" as it has WBS element.
- Material Type is ERSA
- GR 103 has happened.
Awaiting your reply
Regards
Samier Danish

Added fields not appearing in the DSO transformations.

Hi,
I have added three new info objects into data fields in the DSO then activated and not appearing added fields in the transformations.
Please suggest me,
regards,
Jayapal.

Hi Jayapal,
i dont know whether it would help you...you can give a try on it.
Instead of deleting the Transformation, just delete the mappings if any in the transformation.
Goto DS->Fields Tab-->In the Column Template info Object. Try mapping corresponding IO with the Source IO.
Then it will show a pop up give Copy . Activate the DS.
Goto Info Provider>Select the Transformation> If it is active-->reactivate it by clicking the Pencil Icon with glass and click activate icon.
If its not active, then reactivate it again by clicking the Pencil Icon with glass.
Let me know if it Works... Cheers
Regards,
Syed
Edited by: shameer83in on Nov 20, 2009 12:10 PM

PO field not appearing while posting Vendor Invoice

Hello,
While posting an entry using FB01/ F-43, for posting key 31(Vendor Invoice), despite making Purchasing Document (Purchase Order) field optional in the field status group of both the posting key 31 as well as the Reconciliation (GL) Account, the Purchasing Document field is not appearing. Please provide the solution if it's possible to get this field while posting the entry.
Thanks and Regards,
Sumita

If you try to book vendor invoice through F-43 or FB01 t codes, then, the system would always show PO open for invoice verification.
In case of a PO, IV should always be done through MIRO t code.
Thanks.
VS

Vendor to vendor entry-profit center field not appearing in line item

Dear Sir/Madam
We have gone live with New GL Implementation. Last month we have implemented it.
Now we are passing entries from vendor to vendor. It is transfer entry from one vendor to another through T code FB01.
we have made the profit center field mandatory in the Reconciliation GL account Field status group. Also we have made the profit center field mandatory in the Posting key 21 and 31 field status. The profit center field is not appearing in the line item because of which we are not able to post the entry.
Kinldy help us to resolve the issue.
Prashant Zinge

Hi Prashant,
As mentioned by all here.. it is correct that you do not have profit centre in Vendor line items..
As I understand it is a one time activity.. of transferring balance from one vendor account to another vendor Account.. so you can use a clearing account to transfer the balances.. this way your entries will increase but you will be able to post w/o any customisation. You can also use LSMW to post this.
Regards,
SAPFICO
Edited by: SAPFICO on Jun 20, 2011 11:49 AM

Input Field not getting cleared.

Hi Fellow Abapers,
I have a peculiar problem. I have done a Module pool program as below.
PROCESS AFTER INPUT.
CHAIN.
    FIELD ztrsc_histh-trptr.
    MODULE user_command_0100.
ENDCHAIN.
CHAIN.
    FIELD ztrsc_fibld-fidocamt.
    MODULE user_fidocamt ON CHAIN-REQUEST.
ENDCHAIN.
MODULE user_command_0100.
CASE sy-ucomm.
WHEN 'NEXT'.
     CLEAR ztrsc_fibld-fidocamt.
     GET NEXT RECORD AND DISPLAY.
ENDCASE..
ENDMODULE.
Input FIELD ztrsc_histh-trptr is display only after Transporter Code is entered and we press "ENTER" key.
Input FIELD ztrsc_fibld-fidocamt is enabled. I enter some value "10".
i have a button as next. When the next record is shown the next record shows but although I clear FIELD ztrsc_fibld-fidocamt, in the debug mode it clears THE FIELD VALUE ztrsc_fibld-fidocamt AND THEN GETS THE NEXT RECORD AND PUTS THE CORRECT NEXT AMOUNT OF THE NEXT RECORD INTO ztrsc_fibld-fidocamt, but when it appears on the Statement FIELD ztrsc_fibld-fidocamt as per the below code.
CHAIN.
    FIELD ztrsc_fibld-fidocamt.
    MODULE user_fidocamt ON CHAIN-REQUEST.
ENDCHAIN.
the old value of "10" re-appears although I had cleared it in the previous Module program. What could be the reason.
Regards
Yao Chhang

Thanks a lot for your prompt answer. Well yes if i clear in the PBO the value gets cleared, but then i wanted to get the next records value into the value field, well the problem got solved in a much easier way i put everything into one chain endchain statement.

New field not appearing in component configuration for standard web dypro

I'm trying to add a new column to a table in an sap web dynpro component. I've enhanced the view to add in the new column but also noticed that it's using component configuration. When I go into the approriate configuration, however, all of the existing columns are there but my new column does not appear. Is there something else I need to do to pull the new field into the configuration?
thanks,
Malcolm.

Hi Olivier
Standard object 0020 gives fields only available in standard tables MARA , MARC , MBEW, MAKT . I too faced this problem for ML based fields in accounting & costing views ( as these fields are not in MBEW they are in CKMLHD). The said Z field if it does not exist in MARC it cannot be seen through std object. U need to do a saperate recording to upload this field. I dont see any other option to my knowledge.U can up load remaing fields through the std object 0020 & create a saperate recorded LSMW only for this Z field.
regards
prasad
reward if useful

Field not appearing in datasource

Hello Experts,
I have enhanced extract structure with a new field. written code to populate the field in CMOD.
But this field is not apperaing in datasource.
I have used debug mode in RSA3 and found that field is getting populated but it is not appearing in output.
Can anyone please help.
Thanks ,
Saurabh

These are steps to appending a field, just in case one was missed:
Step 1: Append structure via RSA6, by finding datasource and then clicking on the Functional Enhancement button; this will open up the append structure. NOTE***If this has already been created, you can access the append structure via SE11 (usually ZA and then the structure name)
Step 2: Add field to the append structure and activate
Step 3: Go back into RSA6 and find the datasource and click on the change icon.
Step 4: Validate the the Hide field is not check for this new field that you added and that the 'Field Only Known in Customer Exit' is checked
Step 5: Save this datasource
Step 6: Open CMOD, enter your project that you have created and then click on components and display
Step 7: Choose EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 for transactional data enhancements (ZXRSAU01) and EXIT_SAPLRSAP_002 for master data enhancements (ZXRSAU02)
Step 8: Activate associated cmod code above and put a breakpoint (hard or soft one) in your code to validate that it is accessing this cmod code that you created.
Step 9: RSA3 and execute in debug mode until breakpoint is hit
If all of the steps above are executed, this field should be populated. There may be an instance that the view of your RSA3 extraction is not showing you all the fields because of the display of this output but if you highlight a record and then click on the magnifying glass above, you will see all the data in that record but this view will only show you the populated fields so if their is not data, there is probably something wrong with your cmod code.

Changing an input field's appearance to Optional in an ESS WD Java scenario

This thread is posted to help customers with a common user based issue with ESS
SAP may deliver some fields in ESS iviews as mandatory however you may not want some fields to be mandatory and may want the iview display to guide the user appropriately
Often delivered mandatory fields have an Asterisk denoting this field as a mandatory
requirement for data entry in the ESS scenario
The purpose of this post is to show how the Asterisk can be removed and therefore indicate to the user that an entry is not required
There may be 2 ways to do this
1) As of a SP9 in ERP 6.0 press Ctrl and Right mouse button on the field in the PCD preview of the   iview you wish to modify. In the Personalization options there is a "Mark as Mandatory" option please select "Not Personalized" and save then review the iview to see if the asterisk is removed
2) If this does not have the desired effect or you have a lower SAP version or SP level you will need    NWDI to make the change. You will require knowledge of NWDI to make the change -->
Open the required scenario in NWDS
Position cursor on Required field and right click and select u2018Propertiesu2019
Go to the u2018Propertiesu2019 tab
Change property field u2018Stateu2019 from u2018Requiredu2019 to u2018Normalu2019
Save the changes
As this field now appears as optional to the user you also have to ensure the
ECC business logic does not reject a user who does not populate the field with data - therefore you will need mark the field as optional in
V_T588M
V_T588MFPROPS
These changes also affect entry of data into this field in PA30 - HR Administrators or users with R3 access will therefore have the same user experience (i.e field is not mandatory)
If you have issues maintaining V_T588MFPROPS appropriately you can insert an overide into V_T588MFPROPC
If you find the ESS scenario still requests an entry in the field it could be that this field is an essential
or core part of this particular ESS scenario and therefore the model expects data to be populated in this field or it could also be that previous or subsequent fields are dependant on an entry in that field - In this case you may need to make a coding change to the model and/or change the business logic of dependant fields as well.
Edited by: Stuart Campbell on May 8, 2009 1:07 PM

Thank you stuart.

Mail: Why do some emails, sent with attachments, not appear in the Sent category

Occasionally I will send an email to four different addressees. The email contains an attachment in pages format, word format and pdf formal. Though it is sent and though it is received by at least one of those to whom it is addressed, it does not appear as sent, in the Sent Mailbox. Why is this and what can be done to get all sent emails to appear as Sent?
Thank you.
Otto

Most mail servers can be accessed in a web browser as well as in Mail. For iCloud, you go here:
iCloud Mail
Check for sent messages.

Input fileds not appearing in IT1005 Planned Compensation in Tab for PPOME

Hello friends,
The business requirement is:
- add IT 1005 Planned Compensation as a tab page in T.code PPOME/PPOCE
- I configured the following in system:
- IMG>Personnel Mgt>Org Mgt>Hierarchy Framework>Integrate New Infotype> >Add Infotype as Tab Page in Detail Area>Define your onw tab page>Tab Page Definition (this is option one)>
I added Tab page as z1005, ticked infotype specific and infotype 1005
> Scenario Definition (Hierarchy Framework) > select OME0 >
Tab Page in Scenario for each Object Type >
I entered object type S (as we need it for Position), tab page: z1005, and respecitve sequence, I did not enter any report name, screen no, FM for Icons and Donot display is unchecked.
Once I did this configuration and run PPOME tcode I got the tab page there but in the input fields it is blank and showing text like ##################### just a row like this.
However when I do the same configuration for IT 1050 Job evaluation, it is working fine there. But 1005 is throwing the above error.
Can anybody faced the same problem and resolve the above issue or incase some SAP Notes are available for the same.
thanks
Sunny

In my opinion, that would be "Best Practice". Although I think that term is over-used. Everything varies by each client's needs/wants and what functionality they use in the system.   That being said, even if they're not using portions of functionality today, it's better to plan for it. That way you don't have to redefine the catalog every time you want to use something new.
There really is no "correct" ratio of Jobs to Positions. For a smaller company you're going to have fewer positions assigned to each job. For a larger company, you're going to have more people doing the same work, and therefore more positions assigned to a lot of your jobs.
I generally recommend a new job is created when there is a difference in one or more of the following.
u2022   Tasks (Function) - Administration vs. Manufacturing vs. Engineering, etc.
u2022   Responsibilities - Supervising other people vs. not supervising, Lead, Trainers, etc.
u2022   Pay Range (significant differences) - Except for differences based on location (Someone in San Fran/Bay area is
    going to get more money than someone doing the same job in Iowa; different amts/currencies for different countries)
u2022   Qualifications/Skills - requires a degree or certificate vs. job that doesn't
With your client, I would recommend having the approximately 200 Jobs, and creating the existing Jobs as Job Families so they could still report on data as they see it today.
...Danialle
Edited by: Danialle Rook on Aug 12, 2010 9:49 PM

Price_C field not appearing in Shopping cart

Hi All,
I am using MDM5.5 SP02 and SRM server 5.0 and facing problem for price field
Earlier I tried to upload catalogs price with price information field , but didn't succeded.
Then I created new field in MDM console as Price_c and uploaded the price.
In UI config I mapped the New_ITEM-PRICE with the new field Price_c.
But when I go to create shopping cart , this field is not available.
Even whatever setting I have made User specific fields i.e Customise display fields ,Customize Search fields are not appearing in the Shopping cart
Please guide me
Thanks
Suds

Hello Suds,
If you create any extra fields or tables then make sure that they have proper codes assigned to them or not in MDM Console.
If not then assigned the proper code name.just follow the code name as MDMSRM_FIELDNAME.
If the field which you have created related to any OCI field then just map with that in UI else map it with NEW_ITEM-CUST_FIELD1.
By doing this, you will get the field which you required.
I hope this will solve your problem.
TNR,
Saurabh...

Amount Rule Type field not appearing in settlement rule screen.

Hi Experts,
We developed a program which creates settlement rules automatically on uploading data from excel file.
We encountered the following error.
cursor field COBRB-BRTYP does not exist in the screen
In the Settlement rule screen, under distribution rules, the field amount rule type is not appearing.
We have 3 level WBS structure. For the 1 level WBS this field is not appearing. But this field is visible for below WBS.
Please help me..
Regards,
Praisty

Hi Balachandar,
As i said, we are using an excel sheet upload to create settlement rules for WBS elements.
While uploading we got this error. COBRB-BRTYP does not exist in the screen.
Now we need to check with abaper, why the program is checking that field in particular.
Any way, thanks for your prompt reply.
Regards,
Praisty

Email id input field not appearing in MK02 while doing recording in SHDB

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for