Empty field prevents user from signing

Good afternoon,
How do I prevent a user from digitally signing the document if there is a blank field.
The issue I am having is that the digital signature prompt pops up. When the user signs, the document saves. After that is executed, my java code executes clearing the signature.
The thing is we have a saved document with a signature in there.
Is there any way I can have a javascipt prevent the digital signature prompt if a field is blank?

I think I found a solution but it is not working as I would hope. I decided to add in a text field above the signature block. See code below:
if(this.getField("PE1").value=="" || this.getField("PE2").value=="" || this.getField("PE3").value=="" || this.getField("PE4").value=="" || this.getField("PE5").value=="" || this.getField("PE6").value==""){
    this.getField("Text100").value="To digitally sign, you must input all ratings in page 2"
    this.getField("Signature37").readonly=false
    else
    this.getField("Text100").value=""
    this.getField("Signature37").readonly=true
It is not executing the read only.
How do I fix this?

Similar Messages

  • How do I prevent users from caching their sign in credentials on OWA page

    I am using Forms based authentication and want to prevent users from caching their credentials on the OWA page.
    Is there an easy way?

    Hi,
    Forms-based authentication enables a sign-in page for Outlook Web App that uses a cookie to store a user's encrypted sign-in credentials in the Internet browser. So this authentication method will force to cache their credentials in the Internet
    browser for some time. The workaround is what Willard Martin suggested.
    Refer from
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb430796(v=exchg.141).aspx
    Best Regards.

  • How to prevent users from running PRC: Transaction Import from WebADI form?

    Hi,
    We are 12.1.3 and trying to create a workflow to approve Project transactions coming through web ADI before they become effective. To this end, we want to prevent users from running the PRC: Transaction Import from the Web ADI.
    I know that if the checkbox Automatically run transaction import is not checked, the program does not run. But we want to hide this checkbox and not allow the possibility that the program could get triggered.
    To this end, we updated the BNE_INTEGRATORS_B with source='C'. This allows you to edit the integrator from Desktop Integration Manager.
    UPDATE BNE_INTEGRATORS_B SET SOURCE ='C' WHERE  INTEGRATOR_CODE ='PAXTTRXB'
    In the 4th step, where the value for Uploader Parameters is set, we have set boolean value to No. These are the fields on the page:
    Parameter Name: bne:import
    Display Name: Start Transaction Upload
    Data Type: Boolean
    Category: Field
    Default Value: Boolean Flag: No
    Description: start Transaction Import Concurrent Request
    Display Options: Displayed: Unchecked
    Display Options: Enabled: Checked
    Display Options: Required: Checked
    Prompt Left: Automatically submit Transaction import
    Display Type: Check Box
    Maximun Size: 100
    Display Size:100
    Now the checkbox is not appearing for the user to check it, But the program is automatically running when you hit Upload in the WebADI. 

    Hi ,
    Try removing the PRC: Transaction Import Program from the request group for the responsibility used by customers to submit the WebADI and then check if the program launches.
    Regards,
    Raghavan

  • Prevent user from update view  object

    Hi all is there is any way to prevent user from update view object at runtime, but if he have a privilege to Update he can update.
    i put all user privilege in a variable in session, but how to use it to prevent user from update .
    or ho w to make updateable view just for create or insert data not update it;
    thnx in advise

    Hi Mohammed,
    > tow view object bad way it means to page (as i think project 50 page mean to create 100 page )??
    Untill the Question is clear Answer will not be clear U never mentioned the Quantum of Pages u gng to work in POST....
    > disable commit button but if user have privilege to insert a new record ??
    Did u think this statement means something.. A user who has no privilege to commit the data wht is the purpose of giving privilege to add the data?????????
    > if i disable table or form and user try to create new record is new fields will be enabled or will be as previous row.
    This too i cant understand?? the user doesnt have access why should he need to create row.. u can disable the Create button too.....
    > by the way is there is any way to catch Sql Statement that will be committed when user press commit .
    While user press commit and u gng to call the ApplicationModule Commit so u can have a hold on doDML() method of the corresponding entity else if u gng to insert though a procedure or function
    U can restrict the same before u calling the same.......
    Regards,
    Suganth.G

  • Hi All, We are in to Release 11.5.10.2.There is a specific requirement to Prevent users from creating Manual Sales Orders in oracle and yet users should be able to book the Sales Orders Imported from CRM system into Orcale.Please advise.

    Hi All, We are in to Release 11.5.10.2.There is a specific requirement to Prevent users from creating Manual Sales Orders in Oracle and  yet users should be able to book the Sales Orders Imported from CRM system into Orcale.Please advise.

    Thanks for your advise.
    However, I missed to mention that we have two set of users  One is for Finished Goods and another for Spares.
    Only Spares users need to be prevented from creating Direct/Manual Sales Orders in Oracle.
    As you suggested, if this will be done at Form level, that may Disallow FG users also to create Manula Sales Orders which should not be the case.
    Further, I tried to test one scenario through Processing Constraints but it did not work.
    Application
    OM
    Validation Type
    Entity
    Temp
    Short Name
    TBL
    Validation Semantics
    Created By
    Equal To
    User(Myself)
    Processing Cosntraint
    Application
    OM
    Entity
    Order Header
    Constraint
    Operation
    User Action
    Create
    Not Allowed
    Conditions
    Group
    Scope
    Validation Entity
    Record Set
    Validation Template
    101
    Any
    Order Header
    Order
    Above Created
    Please advise.

  • How do I prevent users from being able to update Firmware

    I have several users (14) with iPad 2 and they rely on an in-house developed App. we have yet to test this App on iOS 5.1 and therefore want to avoid any of the users updating the iPads at all cost!
    this question is in two parts:
    How can I prevent users from upgrading firmware themselves short of just asking nicely?
    How can I stop the iPad from automatically downloading the Upgrade when I deploy a Policy using the iPhone Configuration Utility?
    Any advice would be great!

    We've been looking at the AirWatch mdm and have been told it has this capability.  Not sure if it would be justified from an economic standpoint for you, however. 

  • Is there any way to prevent users from ship confirming on a particular date?

    Hello All,
    We have a requirement to prevent users from ship confirming on a particular date. This is due to they are performing Annual Physical Inventory.
    Is it possible to restrict users performing shipping transactions on this particular date?
    I have tried adding exception to the existing Calendar set at org level and there is no customer specific Calendar defined, however it is still allowing me to perform ship confirm.
    Please let me know if you have any suggestion on this requirement.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Yes is Possible.
    You can add An Exception in Your Shipping Calender.
    So when Some one tries to ship an Order on that date Oracle will automatically select Next possible date.
    Thanks
    Shameer

  • Adobe Reader Updater has been 'downloading' for over a week now...it is preventing me from signing out and closing my mini Mac, can't close down.  The window will not close ever, just keeps spinning around...help!

    How can I stop the 'Adobe Reader Update' from constantly trying to download?  It's been over a week now, preventing me from signing out of my computer and other issues too. Can you help please? thanks!

    Hi! The version is OS X 10 8 5...not sure what that means lol but it makes a difference obviously! 
    I did what  you said now and it has worked, thanks so very much for getting back to me.  I really appreciate your help!!
    Can I ask you questions in the future or do I just do that through the forum?\
    Thanks again, Jennie 
          From: Anubha Goel <[email protected]>
    To: rubyrose1950 <[email protected]>
    Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 10:42 PM
    Subject: You have been mentioned by Anubha Goel in Re: Adobe Reader Updater has been 'downloading' for over a week now...it is preventing me from signing out and closing my mini Mac, can't close down. The window will not close ever, just keeps spinning around...help! in Adobe Community
    |
    You have been mentioned
    by Anubha Goel in Re: Adobe Reader Updater has been 'downloading' for over a week now...it is preventing me from signing out and closing my mini Mac, can't close down. The window will not close ever, just keeps spinning around...help! in Adobe Community - View Anubha Goel's reference to you  Hey rubyrose1950, Could you please let me know what version of OS are you working on.You might try uninstalling Reader and install it again from the below mentioned link:Adobe Acrobat Reader DC Install for all versions Let me know how it goes. Regards,Anubha 
    Participate in the conversation by replying to this email
    To stop receiving these messages whenever you are mentioned, go to your preferences and disable notifications for direct social actions. |

  • How to prevent users from saving and emailing intranet documents externally

    Someone in our company needs to upload a pdf to our sharepoint intranet site for internal-only use. How can I prevent users from downloading it and emailing it externally?
    I mean, a user could screenshot it I guess, but I need to give management a due diligence answer.

    You would need to look into a reverse proxy/firewall that had the ability to block access based on content. This isn't something you can accomplish out of the box with SharePoint (even with AD RMS).
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • How can SAP be configured to prevent users from consuming locks?

    How can SAP be configured to prevent users from consuming locks?
    The issue is that we want to prevent users to use upto maximum locks and so that we will not get lock table overflow issue. I know that we can assign parameter "enque/table_size" a good amount of value. But it is not for any specific user.
    Also want to alert in CCMS if any user reaches to its maximum speficified limit of locks.
    Thanks
    Gopesh

    You cannot set a limit of locks per user. There are two ways to reduce/control the number of locks:
    - change fewer records within one transaction
    - cover more records with one lock using wildcards
    Basically it is an application / development issue.
    Best regards, Michael

  • To prevent user from droping any object from a sepacific schema

    Dear User
    I have a database user like "aaa" in oracle 7.3.4.0.1 database.i do not want user "aaa" to drop his own schema objects like table and any other objects that he is owner.Do i have any system privilege to stop this user from doing so.User should be able to create objects and modify object but not to drop any object.For this purpose i have created a database trigger at database level to stop user "aaa" for doing above action.this trigger is giving me error on creation in oracle 7.3.4.0.1 .But when i tried same trigger in oracle 8i and 9i it work well.In oracle 8i and 9i it is preventing user from droping his own objects but i get other errors also along with raised error in trigger which i want to stop .The error which i am raising in trigger is
    ORA-20001 INVALID COMMAND BUT OTHER TWO ERRORS THAT R RAISED AUTOMATICALLY ARE
    ORA-00604 ERROR OCCURED AT RECURSIVE SQL LEVEL 1
    AND
    ORA-06512 AT LINE 8
    I WANT TO STOP THESE TWO ERRORS .
    PLZ HELP ME IN THIS REGARD AS SOON AS POSSBILE .
    Thank u.

    Given that you have not posted your code it is very difficult to know why you are getting these errors.
    Howver, I can take a guess. If I were trying to implement this functionality I would build a database event trigger that fired whenever a DROP command was issued and cause that command to fail. If this is the approach you've taken I think you are out of luck, as I belive DDL triggers were introduced in Oracle 8.
    Mind you, it's been a long time since I worked on Oracle7, so I might be wrong. In which case post your code, don't make me guess again.
    Cheers, APC

  • To prevent user from droping his own object .

    Dear User
    I have a database user like "aaa" in oracle 7.3.4.0.1 database.i do not want user "aaa" to drop his own schema objects like table and any other objects that he is owner.Do i have any system privilege to stop this user from doing so.User should be able to create objects and modify object but not to drop his own objects.For this purpose i have created a database trigger at database level to stop user "aaa" for doing above action.this trigger is giving me error on creation in oracle 7.3.4.0.1 .But when i tried same trigger in oracle 8i and 9i it work well.In oracle 8i and 9i it is preventing user from droping his own objects but i get other errors also along with raised error in trigger which i want to stop .The error which i am raising in trigger is
    ORA-20001 INVALID COMMAND BUT OTHER TWO ERRORS THAT R RAISED AUTOMATICALLY ARE
    ORA-00604 ERROR OCCURED AT RECURSIVE SQL LEVEL 1
    AND
    ORA-06512 AT LINE 8
    I WANT TO STOP THESE TWO ERRORS .
    PLZ HELP ME IN THIS REGARD AS SOON AS POSSBILE .
    plz tell me is there any system privilege to stop user from droping his own object or any other way along with trigger at database level.
    Thank u.

    Hi
    DBAs can use PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE (in system schema) to disable certain SQL and SQL*Plus commands in the SQL*Plus environment on a per-user basis. SQL*Plus, not Oracle, enforces this security. DBAs can even restrict access to the GRANT, REVOKE, and SET ROLE commands in order to control users' ability to change their database privileges.
    The PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE table enables you to list roles which you do not want users to activate with an application. You can also explicitly disable use of various commands, such as SET ROLE. For example, you could create an entry in the PRODUCT_USER_PROFILE table to:
    read more about this at
    http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a90842/ch10.htm#1005648

  • CE10 how to prevent user from view hostrical instance

    hi,
    We are currently using CE10. One of our user used search functionality in enterprise to search for reports start with 'employee' and it came  back with all the crystal reports on the server that  started with employees, even the one the user doesn't have access to.  My greatest concern about this is that users can view historical instance and it is sensitive data.  Does anybody know whether or not this is a bug in CE10?  Is there a patch/fix for this?  Is there any configuration change that I can make to
    prevent users from being able search all the reports on the server rather just their own reports?  Any help is greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Susan

    hi,
    I have an EVERYONE group with limited access(view object), and EVERYONE group is added to each folder with NO ACCESS.  If I revoke view object(explicitly denied) privilege from EVERYONE group, do I still need to remove EVERYONE group from each folder?  When I'm at folder level in CMC, I see EVERYONE GROUP added, but when I tried to remove the EVERYONE GROUP, the EVERYONE group is not an option for removal.  What am I missing?
    Thanks for your help!
    Regards,
    Susan Johnson

  • How to prevent user from creating jobs

    Hi,
    we need to prevent user from creating jobs on a dev enviorement. It's a 10.2.0.4 database standard on linux 64bits.
    Their schema has only connect and resource roles. Is there a way to prevent them from creating jobs? In 11g it's the CREATE JOB permission, but in 10g i'm not sure how can i do this.
    Thanks for any ideas!

    On 10g it's probably the CREATE JOB as well.
    http://www.oracle.com/pls/db102/homepage
    Alternatively you could:
    alter system set job_queue_processes=0
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14237/initparams089.htm#REFRN10077

  • How to prevent users from creating new folders in share folder directory?

    Hello guys
    I'd like to know How to prevent users from creating new folders in share folder directory but still keep their power of creating new folders in their personal 'my folder'?
    I tried changing the 'manage privilage ---- create folder' to deny certain user accounts, but by doing so, it also stops the user from creating new folders in their 'my folder', which is not good..
    I also tried going into these share folders and tried different access types such as 'change/delete', 'read', 'traverse folder' etc, but none of it work ideally. The 'change/delete' access still allows them to create new folders, 'read' access prevents creating new folders but also take away their power of saving reports..
    Any thoughts on how to take away their ability to ONLY create new folders in share folder areas without affecting their other privileges?
    Please advise
    Thank you

    Easy, on the shared folders root folder only give them 'read' or 'traverse folder' but on the the folder inside the shared folders root folder give them 'change/delete'. That means they can change anything inside those folders but not create any folders at the shared folders root level.

Maybe you are looking for