Enable Dual control function for FBZ2

Hi,
Its related to Dual control functionality for vendor master data. I got a issue, if I change the sensitive fields for a vendor master and run F110, then it shows exception that vendor master not yet confirmed.
IS it possible to post outgoing payment through transaction FBZ2, in this case?
I have seen some transactions where the clearing document was posted by transfering the payable amount to intercompany or offsetting account and making payment later, without getting any exception, eventhough vendor master change not yet confirmed.

hello, anisha.
like you, i have also wondered what the payment block in the customer master is for. after reading the documentation and asking an FI consultant, i gather that this block is apparently used to prevent automatic payment transactions for a customer.
again, why anyone would want to automatically post payments for a customer is an issue i wish to explore. perhaps this applies to scenarios where very many customers pay the exact invoice amount or have the payments guaranteed? or perhaps to prevent automatic offsetting of a customer/vendor account?
regards.
Edited by: jonathan y on May 6, 2009 10:23 AM

Similar Messages

Anyway to selectivily enable/disable bluetooth function for selected apps like papago in iphone.

Hi,
Anyway to selectively enable/disable bluetooth function for selected apps like papago navigator in iphone.
I want to maintain bluetooth connectivity to car headset for handsfree driving while papago navigator on ky iphone continuously guide me on the road using the iphone speaker. So when someone called me on the phone, it will use the car headset. is there such as apps?
Rgds,
Kpk

Hi,
In pageflow definition, "Train Stop-->Skip" property controls the enable/disable state.
If Skip value is true (it can be controlled with EL expression) than related link and button in train components are disabled.
They are enabled other If Skip value is false (It is default).

Enable E-mail functionality for RFQ/PO.

Hi All,
I have a requirement to enable E-mail functionality to send the PO/RFQ output to the Vendor. Whenever we go to the messages in the PO ME22N or ME23N & click on the out message, we should get a pop up asking to enter the E-mail address.
Please let me know what settings do we need to do?
-Muneer.

Hi,
Purchase order via e-mail in SAP system can be done , there are some configurations and pre-requisites to do as follow:
1. You must maintain an e-mail address in the address in the vendor master.
2. The same applies to your own user master. You also have to specify an e-mail address there in order to identify the sender.
Note that it is not possible to change the e-mail address of the vendor via the SAP purchase order transaction (ME21N, ME22N, and so on). The system only uses the e-mail address of the vendor that is maintained in the vendor master!
3. For the output type for default values, a communication strategy needs to be maintained in the Customizing that supports the e-mail. You can find the definition of the communication strategy in the Customizing via the following path: (SPRO -> IMG -> SAP Web Application Server -> Basic Services -> Message Control -> Define Communication Strategy). As a default, communication strategy CS01 is delivered. This already contains the necessary entry for the external communication. Bear in mind that without a suitable communication strategy it is not possible to communicate with a partner via Medium 5 (external sending).
4. Use the standard SAP environment (program 'SAPFM06P', FORM routine 'ENTRY_NEU' and form 'MEDRUCK') as the processing routines.
5. In the condition records for the output type (for example, Transaction MN04), use medium '5' (External send).
6. You can use Transaction SCOT to trigger the output manually. The prerequisite for a correct sending is that the node is set correctly. This is not described here, but it must have already been carried out.
7. To be able to display, for example, the e-mail in Outlook, enter PDF as the format in the node.
For more details, check out the OSS note :191470
Regards,
Biju K

Deductable and Non deductable Control function for CVD A/C during Import Procurement.....

Hi Expert,
I have a requirement like my client needs to take credit availed on CVD (JCV1), ECess on CVD (JECV) and H&SECess on CVD (J1CV) in Import procurement for one Company code. for 1000, however client doesn't want to take credit availed for another company code for 2000 on CVD (JCV1), ECess on CVD (JECV) and H&SECess on CVD (J1CV) and the same value need to added with material cost at the time of MIGO posting after Custom Invoice posting.
Please share your view how can I control this thing through Account key and accurals in pricing procedure else any other control function available for the same.
Thanks in Advance,
SKN

You need to add CVD on material cost for company code 1000 not for    2000.
So you have   to maintain   the two pricing procedures   for 1000 and 2000
should not be maintain any accural/account key for JCV1   for 1000
Remove the account no in Company code settings in CIN

Enabling the Export function for a distribution list in 'Private folders'

Dears,
Could someone please guide to the appropriate authorization that would allow the 'Export...' function for a distribution list created in a folder under 'Private folders' - Transaction : SBWP
The option is dimmed, although the user used has the SAP_ALL profile.
Thanks.
Reda

click file/publish settings/flash/actionscript settings and make sure frame 1 is set as the export frame.
if that's already set, don't use test scene.

Legal Control functionality for Purchase order

Hi,
We have a requirement where in while saving the Purchase Order, the system should look whether for that material if the legal control data/ foreign trade data is maintained specifying that it is a controlled substance then the licence should be maintained before saving the PO. If the licence is not maintained then the Purchase order should not be allowed to be saved.
In a nut shell, we want to control the saving of Purchase order depending on whether the licence is maintained or not.
This has been done for Sales order. The standard SAP functionality allows the document control.
This can be seen in SPRO - Materials Management - Purchasing - Foreign trade/Customs - Legal control - Document control.
Here we can see that only Sales order and shipping documents can be controlled.
Is there any way we can control the Purchase Ordr also?
Please let me know for any clarification regarding the requirement.
Regards,
Ramachandra DN

Hi Ramachandra,
this kind of functionality is not available in SRM. Have a look into GTS Module, which can be connected to SRM for achiving your requirement. http://help.sap.com/saphelp_gts30/helpdata/en/1d/8082ab7248f74ca09861d9713b9a52/content.htm
All somehow available control, compliance and trade features are available via GTS. Any further need to be accomplished via self development.
Cheers,
Claudia

Can i know the copy controls functionality for on standard order to billing

hi,
sap gurus,
can i know the copy controls to be set in for functioning standard order to billing document.
plz say the config settings and t.code for that ie order to billing
regards,
balaji.t
09990019711.

Dear balaji
If you can tell us in which scenario, you need the following, it will be easy to suggest. Anyway you can try with the following which is for service (item category TAD)
Go to VTFA and maintain the following settings:-
Header Data
Copying requirements::::::::001
Copy item number::::::::::::::X
Item Level
Copying requirements:::::::::002
Data VBRK/VBRP::::::::::::::001
Billing quantity:::::::::::::::::::A
Pos/neg.quantity::::::::::::::::+
Pricing type:::::::::::::::::::::::A
If it is a third party, then at item category (TAS) level, you need to maintain the following
Copying requirements::::::::::028
Data VBRK/VBRP:::::::::::::::000
Billing quantity::::::::::::::::::::F
Pos/neg.quantity:::::::::::::::::+
Pricing type:::::::::::::::::::::::::G
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Workflow for Dual Control Principle for Posting and Reversing manual postin

Hi Experts,
                 As per this link http://help.sap.com/saphelp_pserv463/helpdata/EN/ae/01e73a86e99c77e10000000a114084/content.htm
                we configured the reaon for posting and reversing and created a custom functiom modules and assigned to events 5500,5502 in instaliation specific function modules but those function modules are not triggered and system is not publishing events APPROVALREQUIRED,REVERSEAPPROVALREQUIRED documents are directedly getting posted.
               how to make the system publish these events and send the documents for approval with out directly getting posted
Regards,
vCentric.

Hi Suhas,
The rule used in workflow template WS50100021 is a standard one. So try to find out that on what basis it is fetching the agents. It could be the case that the logic specified in the rule does not fulfill your requirement.
The other reason could be that you have not specified the task as general. Please check if the agents tab is activated(green) in the task or not. If it is not you need to set the task as general.
SOLUTION : if you want to get the workitem in your own SAP Inbox for testing purpose, you can set the WFINITIATOR as agent instead of that standard rule. This setting will send the workitem in your own SAP Inbox.
Regards,
Guddan

Master data changes Dual control (per Company code)

Hello Experts,
Am now planning to setup Dual Control for Vendor & Customer Master's Sensitive fields like Bank Account details (note that Bank details are setup in "General data" irrespective of Company code.
My client has Companies spread across the globe.
I have some questions. Hope somebody can help.
1) Can i activate Dual Control functionality for just 1 or 2 Companies. As far as i know this is not possible in config. Any easy work around?
2) If i implement this change as it is , how does it work?
For example if an Accounting clerk in Germany changes a Vendor Bank Account number , any one who has access to FD08 (or FD09) in France can approve this change. Where as ideally this change should only be able to confirm by a Manager in Germany.
This means every body can see & confirm other companies master data changes.
Just a thought, can i restrict this in authorisation by Account Group?
But isn't there a way to display only the relevant changes to be confirmed by each manager(limited to thier own Company or Account group)
Thanks in advance.

Bank Details are not company code specific. So can't restrict per company code.
Any other suggestions, please ?

Dual control for vendors per Company code

Hi,
we are going to setup dual control (sensitive fields) for master data of vendors (fk01, fk02).
Is there a possibilty to use dual control only for certain company codes and not all?
How can I restrict this - via workflow, user authorisation, user exit?
Any idea or solution?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Yvonne

Hi,
thank you both for your fast replies.
Dual control means we want to confirm critical vendor changes (t code fk08, fk09).
That means if someone Create (fk01) or Change (fk02) Vendor data with sensitive fields, another person has to approve this changes in transaction fk08 or fk09.
But this confirmation in fk08 and fk09 should not be necassary for all changes in fk01 or fk02, but only for some company codes.
In this standard workaround in SAP all vendor changes need to be approved. How can I restrict this that only some company codes need to be confirmed in transaction fk08 and fk09.
Thanks.
Yvonne

Cannot enable parental controls for Guest if FileVault enabled

FileVault is enabled on my Mac. When I subsequently enabled Find My Mac, the Guest User account was automatically enabled, as it is required for Find My Mac's theft recovery feature. When I accessed the Guest User in the Users & Groups Preferences panel, the "Enable parental controls" option for Guest User was greyed out. Thus, anyone with physical access to my computer, such as my kid, can gain unfettered access to the Internet without a password.
I did find a solution. I unchecked the "Allow guests to log in to this computer" box in the Preferences panel. This caused the "Enable parental controls" box to become checked (seems to be a bug). I then checked the "Allow guests to log in to this computer" box, which caused the "Enable parental controls" box to become unchecked. At this point, the "Enable parental controls" box was no longer greyed out, and I was able to check it.
System: Late 2014 Retina iMac with 3.5 GHz Intel Core i5, 8 GB memory, OS 10.10

Update: Although the method above appeared to enable parental controls, they do not work. When I log in as Guest (causing the computer to reboot into Safari-only mode), I am able to access a very well-known adult website (play*** dot com).

Dual control on sensitive fields change

Dear Expert
i would like to understand the implementation steps for dual control function. is there any complete guidance that able to share?
i have the following questions too:
based on my study, i don't see where is the control on this dual control function? because we still can post invoice and payment except blocking in payment run only.
in the standard functionality, is there any notification can be sent to authorised person whenever there is a change of sensitive field?
if the change is rejected, any notification can be sent to the person in charge, and how to do this?
so when a change is being rejected, but the change is remains effective, meaning that user needs to change back to old value manually?
is there a field named "One Time Account" in vendor master data? this was one of the sensitive fields that highlighted by IT auditor.
thanks in advance for any feedback.
Rgds
Joslyn Tan

Hi,
Please go through the following path for configuration :
Point No. 1
1> Customer
IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Customer Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Customer Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Customers)
2> Vendor
IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Vendor Accounts --> Master Data --> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data --> Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Vendors)
Point No. 2
You can execute transaction code FD08 in background with a periodic job for each User ID who has authorization and tick on Accounts to be confirmed by me and send the output via mail through distribution list or each user can view output by viewing spool by going to transaction code SP01.
Point No. 3
Same as point 2 only need to select option Accounts refused.
Point No. 4
Yes
Point No. 5
Same as point 1
Hope your issue gets resolved.
Regards,
Tejas

Can Bank Master Be Dual Control?

Hi Gurus,
Numerous requests to make changes to Bank Master (FI02) are causing some problem and we are thinking about putting some restrictions within the Bank Master. I know we can apply the dual control functionality to the vendor master bank details by making some fields sensitive. But is there a way to make the SWIFT code field in the Bank Master sensitive?
Thanks,
Keen

Hi,
You can do that by Authorization groups. Go to Spro: IMG. Enter "dual control" in search tool (ctrl + F).
You have mentioned abount sensitive case, FK08/FD08. In this case you can't do for Banks Master data.
Regards

Dual-active detection for VSS via enhanced PAGP

Hello,
What is the configuration needed on an etherchannel PAGP trunk to enable dual active detection for VSS on 4500X ?
I have enabled it on my vss in global mode but I don't know which vlan to allow on the trunk towards my switch in PAGP.
Is it the native vlan that I should allow on the trunk ?
Thanks for the help
Jeremy

Hi Jeremy,
You can allow all the vlans of specific vlans under the portchannel that connects to the access switches. Usually, best practice is to allow only the vlans you are using on that specific access switch.
Dual-active detection command is applied under the VSS domain for the specific portchannel connecting to your access switches. It is not per vlan.
Have a look
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/15.1.2/XE_340/configuration/guide/vss.html#wp1063913
HTH

Use of business partner functionality in combination with dual control

Is there a generally agreed upon procedure to use the business partner functionality in combination with dual control? The problem is that when you block a business partner, the customer/ vendor master data aren't blocked automatically. You can then still use them in transactions, which leads to problems.
So is there a way to make this work or a procedure to do this?
Niels Vanwingh

Thanks Masa,
I did notice the 'Add external supplier from' in create supplier or bidder option. However there is a small catch and your experience may help.
Let me explain the requirement and scenario here in SRM 7.
We are implementing the Registration of Supplier scenario; both ROS and SRM are in same client. When a potential supplier registers themselves in the registration system, a BP number is created (an Internal number range is defined for this). After accepting the potential supplier in pre-select screen the purchaser has two options to transfer the potential supplier from the ROS system to SRM
Option 1: He can select the accepted potential supplier from the supplier directory option and transfer the business partner to SRM. In this case the business partner number of the potential supplier is retained in SRM and a business partner with supplier and bidder tag is created. However the purchaser does not have any option to select which type of business partner he would like to create like supplier or bidder.
Option 2: Purchase can go to create supplier or bidder option and choose the u2018Add external supplier formu2019 from the ROS system and create the business partner. The ROS business partner details are copied to the create supplier screen, but the purchaser have to provide an external business partner number for the supplier. This is because we have defined external number range for business partner for the vendors that are replicated from ERP to SRM.
Objective is the ROS business partner should be retained in SRM with option to create as supplier and bidder and then manually create ERP supplier with same SRM BP number and map against SRM supplier.
Is there any way we can achieve this?
In SRM 5.5 with Manage business partner functionality we could achieve as system give us the option which business partner type we would like to create as well as retains the ROS BP number in SRM.
Regards
Sandeep

Enable Dual control function for FBZ2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for