Enable windows explorer for LLB files broke

was running LV6, 6.1, now 7.0 on win98 machine.
recently ran microsoft regclean and now I have no more support for viewing inside .LLB files through windows explorer. Attempting to re-enable this through LabVIEW/tools/options does not help.
hints?

Hi Paul,
I would not reccommend that you manually edit the registry keys associated with LabVIEW (or any other program for that matter) unless you are intimately familiar with it. We do not publish the registry keys used by LabVIEW for this reason.
If you need to fix the llb support for Windows Explorer, I would recommend that your perform at least a repair on that feature under Add/Remove programs as an administrator. From your question's description, it sounds like you do not have many priviledges on this particular PC. You may want to just try it first as an admin to make sure.
Have a good one!
Charlie S.
Visit ni.com/gettingstarted for step-by-step help in setting up your system

Similar Messages

  • Enable Windows Explorer for LLB in LabVIEW 8.5.1

    I have a fresh install of LabVIEW 8.5.1.  I would like to treat an llb as a folder in Windows Explorer like I have in the past.  The only problem is that this option was typically available in Tools->Options->Environment.  I doesn't appear to be there in my 8.5.1 installation.  Is there an alternate procedure I can use to turn on this feature in 8.5.1?  It would be a shame if this functionality has gone away.  My OS is XP Pro.
    Thanks,
    Greg

    Hi Greg,
    There is a workaround for using Windows Explorer instead of LLB manager to handle your LLBs. This knowledgebase explains the steps.
    Instead of using Windows Explorer, LabVIEW 8.5+ uses LLB Manager. This information can be found on the upgrade notes for 8.5.
    Warm regards,
    Karunya R
    National Instruments
    Applications Engineer

  • How can I enable Windows Explorer (Windows 7 64 bit) to open LabView 8.2.1 LLB files?

    How can I enable Windows Explorer to open LabView LLB files? I am running LabView 8.2.1 on Windows 7 64 bit. The option “Enable Windows Explorer for LLB Files” in Tools/Options/Environment is unchecked and grayed out.

    LabVIEW until 7.1 came with a shell extension that could display the content of an LLB in an explorer window.
    That was removed in LabVIEW 8.x for  a number of reasons.
    - Shell extensions are pretty badly documented, tricky to implement right, and of very limited use since only Windows Explorer and a few explorer replacements can use them. It doesn't add any functionality for most other programs in Windows, since the shell extension are a Windows Explorer thing, and not a Windows core technology.
    - With 8.x NI decided that LLBs were pretty old fashioned and their main feature of supporting file names longer than the DOS 8.3 naming was pretty much obsoleted by then, while they didn't allow for more than one level of directory hierarchy. So they decided to depreciate LLBs and declared them a legacy technology that should not be used for new development anymore.
    - For the uupcoming 64 bit version of Windows a new shell extension would have been required to allow Explorer to use it.
    For all these reasons the LLB shell extension was removed from the LabVIEW installation to further discourage the use of LLBs.
    If you have a LabVIEW 7.0 or 7.1 installation on your computer and run 32 Bit Windows you can enable the shell extension in the LabVIEW Options dialog.
    Rolf Kalbermatter
    CIT Engineering Netherlands
    a division of Test & Measurement Solutions

  • How do I enable syntax highlighting for jspf files on Dreamweaver CS6 on Windows?

    I followed the instructions (which I modified for CS6) in this posting: http://blog.metameister.com/blog/2011/04/08/open-new-file-types-and-add-syntax-highlightin g-in-dreamweaver-cs5-on-window…
    but it did not work for CS6.
    How do I enable syntax highlighting for jspf files on Dreamweaver CS6 on Windows 7?
    cheers
    Marvin in Edmonton

    Ok, I figured it out after hunting for a few hours.
    Step 1. Add the File Type
    In Dreamweaver’s toolbar:
    Select Edit > Preferences; 
    under File Types / Editors, add .jspf to the line “Open in Code View:”.
    Step 2. Extensions.txt
    Add file type .jspf to the Extensions.txt files. There are two of these files:
    C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Dreamweaver CS6\en_US\Configuration
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe Dreamweaver CS6\configuration
    Step 3. MMDocumentTypes.xml
    Add jspf to the MMDocumentTypes.xml files. Open this file in Notepad or Text Editor. Do not modify the Dreamweaver configuration files within Dreamweaver.
    There are three MMDocumentTypes.xml files to be modified: 
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe Dreamweaver CS6\configuration\DocumentTypes
    C:\Users\mhaagsma\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Dreamweaver CS6\en_US\Configuration
    C:\Users\mhaagsma\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\Dreamweaver CS6\en_US\Configuration\DocumentTypes\
    Step 4. Restart Dreamweaver
    Hopefully the file type will now be recognized and appear with syntax highlighting.

  • How to enable Windows Explorer Thumbnail Viewer to display PSD files?

    Hi,
    I am using Adobe Photoshop Extended CS5 (64-Bit) on Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate (64-Bit).
    When using Windows Explorer to browse through file folders, I notice that the Photoshop files (.psd) do not display a thumbnail preview, like other graphic files do. How can I enable the Windows Explorer Thumbnail Viewer to display PSD files?
    Thanks for your help,
    The MiJiT

    Adobe software doesn't provide a 64 bit codec and as far as I know there is no freeware to do it on x64 systems.
    There are two pay-for applications that I know of:  Mystic Thumbs and Ardfry's PSD codec
    http://mysticcoder.net/mysticthumbs.html
    http://www.ardfry.com/
    -Noel

  • Disabling Windows Explorer For Non Admins and Leaving it Enabled For Admins.

    Good evening,
    I am running a Citrix XenApp environment and I need to disable explorer.exe from running for non admin users. My team and I have discovered that exporer.exe can be accessed by any app that is being used by the end user and therefore can grant that user access
    to the XenApp server interface--this is a BIG NO NO!
    The users do not have admin rights when in explorer.exe but they can shutdown the server. I can disable a few areas such as the taskmgr, regedit, cmd, windows+x, and I can prevent the user from shutting down the system by only allowing them to log off,
    and prevent them from making changes to desktop icons, but it would be much preferred to stick it to the users and not allow them to access the XenApp server interface at all,
    I have tested changing the shell for explorer.exe from explorer.exe to iexplorer.exe and this worked fine (it only displayed the desktop wallpaper for the logged on user), but the change was not reversible. Luckily, I took a snapshot of my virtual test system
    before hand. 
    Is there a way to prevent Windows Explorer from running for all non admins and also so that the local administrator account is not affected by the change as well? I have also tried preventing explorer.exe from running via GPO but that didn't work.
    Thanks in advance,

    Hi,
    A more robust and managable way of securing your systems by controlling which applications that can be launched is Software Restriction Policies.
    Check this article for an introduction to Software Restriction Policies:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2008.06.srp.aspx
    Regards.
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • How do I view an FTP site in Windows Explorer for drag and drop file upload in Firefox?

    In Internet Explorer you have the drop-down menu option called '''"Page"''' (located below the address bar, on the right-hand side). In the options listed you can''''' "Open FTP side in Windows Explorer"'''''.
    I cannot seem to locate a similar option within Firefox 4.0.
    Guidance and suggestions welcome. Thanks.

    You can look at:
    * FireFTP: https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/addon/684
    * FileZilla: http://filezilla.sourceforge.net/

  • Windows thumbnail for PSD files

    Hi everyone,
    Until a few days ago, PSD files never did have an icon in Windows Explorer. But now I have this :
    (I pixelated the file names so this is normal.)
    What is not normal, or at least, what I don't understand, is how the file thumbnail was created. It doesn't appear on all files, and disappears (reverts to the PSD icon such as the one at the top of this image) when I save the file. As I don't constantly monitor the desktop, I can't tell when the thumbnail is generated, but it can take hours, or never come back by itself.
    So I wondered, what does generate the thumbnail, and if so, how can I enable imemdiate thumbnail generation ?
    Configuration :
    Asus G51Vx - Intel C2D T7500, nVidia GTX 260, 8GB RAM
    Windows 7 x64 Business
    Adobe CS5
    Thanks in advance for your answers, any help is appreciated.

    > So I wondered, what does generate the thumbnail, and if so, how can I enable imemdiate thumbnail generation ?
    I have seen this behavior when a 32 bit thumbnail provider is installed on a 64 bit system.  Thumbnails will only be generated when the folder is viewed from a 32 bit app--usually from a File Open dialog.
    Since your system is 64 bit, there isn't a way to enable immediate generation by a 32 bit provider.  You'll need a 64 bit provider such as our PSD codec, which was mentioned already.  http://www.ardfry.com/psd-codec
    I agree that a commercial codec is a difficult purchase if you are not a professional and your time is not valuable.  If you are a pro, then the codec should quickly pay for itself: it should be a straight forward business decision.

  • Windows Explorer misreads large-file .zip archives

       I just spent about 90 minutes trying to report this problem through
    the normal support channels with no useful result, so, in desperation,
    I'm trying here, in the hope that someone can direct this report to some
    useful place.
       There appears to be a bug in the .zip archive reader used by Windows
    Explorer in Windows 7 (and up, most likely).
       An Info-ZIP Zip user recently reported a problem with an archive
    created using our Zip program.  The archive was valid, but it contained
    a file which was larger than 4GiB.  The complaint was that Windows
    Explorer displayed (and, apparently believed) an absurdly large size
    value for this large-file archive member.  We have since reproduced the
    problem.
       The original .zip archive format includes uncompressed and compressed
    sizes for archive members (files), and these sizes were stored in 32-bit
    fields.  This caused problems for files which are larger than 4GiB (or,
    on some system types, where signed size values were used, 2GiB).  The
    solution to this fundamental limitation was to extend the .zip archive
    format to allow storage of 64-bit member sizes, when necessary.  (PKWARE
    identifies this format extension as "Zip64".)
       The .zip archive format includes a mechanism, the "Extra Field", for
    storing various kinds of metadata which had no place in the normal
    archive file headers.  Examples include OS-specific file-attribute data,
    such as Finder info and extended attributes for Apple Macintosh; record
    format, record size, and record type data for VMS/OpenVMS; universal
    file times and/or UID/GID for UNIX(-like) systems; and so on.  The Extra
    Field is where the 64-bit member sizes are stored, when the fixed 32-bit
    size fields are too small.
       An Extra Field has a structure which allows multiple types of extra
    data to be included.  It comprises one or more "Extra Blocks", each of
    which has the following structure:
           Size (bytes) | Description
          --------------+------------
                2       | Type code
                2       | Number of data bytes to follow
            (variable)  | Extra block data
       The problem with the .zip archive reader used by Windows Explorer is
    that it appears to expect the Extra Block which includes the 64-bit
    member sizes (type code = 0x0001) to be the first (or only) Extra Block
    in the Extra Field.  If some other Extra Block appears at the start of
    the Extra Field, then its (non-size) data are being incorrectly
    interpreted as the 64-bit sizes, while the actual 64-bit size data,
    further along in the Extra Field, are ignored.
       Perhaps the .zip archive _writer_ used by Windows Explorer always
    places the Extra Block with the 64-bit sizes in this special location,
    but the .zip specification does not demand any particular order or
    placement of Extra Blocks in the Extra Field, and other programs
    (Info-ZIP Zip, for example) should not be expected to abide by this
    artificial restriction.  For details, see section "4.5 Extensible data
    fields" in the PKWARE APPNOTE:
          http://www.pkware.com/documents/casestudies/APPNOTE.TXT
       A .zip archive reader is expected to consider the Extra Block type
    codes, and interpret accordingly the data which follow.  In particular,
    it's not sufficient to trust that any particular Extra Block will be the
    first one in the Extra Field.  It's generally safe to ignore any Extra
    Block whose type code is not recognized, but it's crucial to scan the
    Extra Field, identify each Extra Block, and handle it according to its
    type.
       Here are some relatively small (about 14MiB each) test archives which
    illustrate the problem:
          http://antinode.info/ftp/info-zip/ms_zip64/test_4g.zip
          http://antinode.info/ftp/info-zip/ms_zip64/test_4g_V.zip
          http://antinode.info/ftp/info-zip/ms_zip64/test_4g_W.zip
       Correct info, from UnZip 6.00 ("unzip -lv"):
    Archive:  test_4g.zip
     Length   Method    Size  Cmpr    Date    Time   CRC-32   Name
    4362076160  Defl:X 14800839 100% 05-01-2014 15:33 6d8d2ece  test_4g.txt
    Archive:  test_4g_V.zip
     Length   Method    Size  Cmpr    Date    Time   CRC-32   Name
    4362076160  Defl:X 14800839 100% 05-01-2014 15:33 6d8d2ece  test_4g.txt
    Archive:  test_4g_W.zip
     Length   Method    Size  Cmpr    Date    Time   CRC-32   Name
    4362076160  Defl:X 14800839 100% 05-01-2014 15:33 6d8d2ece  test_4g.txt
    (In these reports, "Length" is the uncompressed size; "Size" is the
    compressed size.)
       Incorrect info, from (Windows 7) Windows Explorer:
    Archive        Name          Compressed size   Size
    test_4g.zip    test_4g.txt         14,454 KB   562,951,376,907,238 KB
    test_4g_V.zip  test_4g.txt         14,454 KB   8,796,110,221,518 KB
    test_4g_W.zip  test_4g.txt         14,454 KB   1,464,940,363,777 KB
       Faced with these unrealistic sizes, Windows Explorer refuses to
    extract the member file, for lack of (petabytes of) free disk space.
       The archive test_4g.zip has the following Extra Blocks: universal
    time (type = 0x5455) and 64-bit sizes (type = 0x0001).  test_4g_V.zip
    has: PWWARE VMS (type = 0x000c) and 64-bit sizes (type = 0x0001).
    test_4g_W.zip has: NT security descriptor (type = 0x4453), universal
    time (type = 0x5455), and 64-bit sizes (type = 0x0001).  Obviously,
    Info-ZIP UnZip has no trouble correctly finding the 64-bit size info in
    these archives, but Windows Explorer is clearly confused.  (Note that
    "1,464,940,363,777 KB" translates to 0x0005545500000400 (bytes), and
    "0x00055455" looks exactly like the size, "0x0005" and the type code
    "0x5455" for a "UT" universal time Extra Block, which was present in
    that archive.  This is consistent with the hypothesis that the wrong
    data in the Extra Field are being interpreted as the 64-bit size data.)
       Without being able to see the source code involved here, it's hard to
    know exactly what it's doing wrong, but it does appear that the .zip
    reader used by Windows Explorer is using a very (too) simple-minded
    method to extract 64-bit size data from the Extra Field, causing it to
    get bad data from a properly formed archive.
       I suspect that the engineer involved will have little trouble finding
    and fixing the code which parses an Extra Field to extract the 64-bit
    sizes correctly, but if anyone has any questions, we'd be happy to help.
       For the Info-ZIP (http://info-zip.org/) team,
       Steven Schweda

    > We can't get the source (info-zip) program for test.
       I don't know why you would need to, but yes, you can:
          http://www.info-zip.org/
          ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/src/
    You can also get pre-built executables for Windows:
          ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/win32/unz600xn.exe
          ftp://ftp.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/win32/zip300xn.zip
    > In addition, since other zip application runs correctly. Since it should
    > be your software itself issue.
       You seem to misunderstand the situation.  The facts are these:
       1.  For your convenience, I've provided three test archives, each of
    which includes a file larger than 4GiB.  These archives are valid.
       2.  Info-ZIP UnZip (version 6.00 or newer) can process these archives
    correctly.  This is consistent with the fact that these archives are
    valid.
       3.  Programs from other vendors can process these archives correctly.
    I've supplied a screenshot showing one of them (7-Zip) doing so, as you
    requested.  This is consistent with the fact that these archives are
    valid.
       4.  Windows Explorer (on Windows 7) cannot process these archives
    correctly, apparently because it misreads the (Zip64) file size data.
    I've supplied a screenshot of Windows Explorer showing the bad file size
    it gets, and the failure that occurs when one tries to use it to extract
    the file from one of these archives, as you requested.  This is
    consistent with the fact that there's a bug in the .zip reader used by
    Windows Explorer.
       Yes, "other zip application runs correctly."  Info-ZIP UnZip runs
    correctly.  Only Windows Explorer does _not_ run correctly.

  • CD ROM/Blu-Ray player now missing in Windows Explorer for HP HDX18

    I currently have a: HP HDX X18T-1100 CTO Premium Notebook PC, product number: FJ927AV
    All of a sudden, I can no longer see the  CD player in windows explorer. If I put a CD in nothing plays, no blu-ray, no DVD, no music CD. If I look at the device in device manager it says there is a problem with the driver. I tried uninstalling the driver and rebooting, but the same thing happens. I also tried numerous Microsoft troubleshooting tips to edit the registry entry and such but the registry entries it says to look for to delete do not exist. I can't find any drivers for my CD ROM on-line to try and re-download.
    I had to uninstall Itunes the other day and re-install it. I see this effects Sony laptops with the exact same CD-ROM drive (optiarc BD-5500s) but I can't find a fix for my HP laptop. I am currently running Windows 8.1.

    Hi  Williamr2042,
    Welcome to the HP forum!
    When I checked the driver page for your computer, HP only list drivers up  to  Windows 7. Unfortunately when researching, I was unable to locate any drivers for the BD Rom BC-5500S ATA Device and Windows 8.1.
    Sparkles1
    I work on behalf of HP
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom right to say “Thanks” for helping!

  • Windows Explorer for Windows 7.1 32-bit does not display pdf title

    Using Adobe Reader XI version 11.0.08 the pdf title does not display in the Title column of Windows Explorer.  This worked under Windows XP 32-bit
    How is this fixed?
    wojw

    Here is the screen shot. Notice the Title column is empty.

  • Free disk space is reported as "working" by Windows Explorer for shares crossing 92TB

    Hello,
    We have shared a folder from Unix box using Samba and the disk space is about 92.5TB. After mapping the share on Windows 7 client, if we view the properties of the mapped share, the free space and the capacity are reported as "working". On the other
    hand, if the disk space is about 90.5TB, free space and capacity are reported correctly in bytes. 
    Also, using the cmd prompt, if we execute "dir" command on the mapped share drive, the free space is correctly reported in bytes both in case of 90.5TB and 92.5TB. 
    Can you please let me know if there is a limitation with Windows explorer in displaying disk capacity if the disk size is more than 92TB?
    Thanks,
    Shilpa

    Hi,
    We would do something test about this result, and then update this thread as soon as possible.
    Alex Zhao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Window location for .terminal file

    Hi,
    I have a custom .terminal file that opens a terminal window to a
    specific number of columns and rows, and runs a command.
    Although I can cause plain ol' Terminal to open at the top left of the
    screen by moving it there, then closing it, my custom file insists on
    opening towards the middle of the screen.
    I want it at the top left.
    I've already deleted the pref file, no joy.
    Here are the properties for my custom file:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd
    ">
    <plist version="1.0">
    <dict>
    <key>CommandString</key>
    <string>ssh -l charles curly</string>
    <key>FontAntialias</key>
    <false/>
    <key>RunCommandAsShell</key>
    <true/>
    <key>VisualBell</key>
    <true/>
    <key>columnCount</key>
    <integer>210</integer>
    <key>name</key>
    <string>Basic</string>
    <key>rowCount</key>
    <integer>55</integer>
    <key>shellExitAction</key>
    <integer>0</integer>
    <key>type</key>
    <string>Window Settings</string>
    </dict>
    </plist>
    Thanks,
    Charles
    Things that make you say, Hmmmmmm...
    If a robber tried to rob a dance club and yelled, "Everybody get
    down", would all the people start dancing?

    Please don't cross post to as many forums as you can find. See the response you got on DOUG.

  • How to create service in Windows XP for jar file?

    Dear friends,
    I'm having an jar file in my Windows XP OS. I would like to create new service Windows XP to run this jar file. When i start the service then the jar file to be executed.
    I did search in google but i didn't get any proper solution for this.
    Could anyone please tell me the best and easiest way to create service for my jar in Windows XP os.
    Thanks in advance,
    Sathish

    Hi Chennail123,
    Just have a read : [*Converting Your Java App into a Windows Service*|http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/34438].

  • Enabling alpha channel for PNG file

    I want to include a logo with a transparent background in an iMovie video, but when I import a PNG file with a transparent background, the background turns black. I think this is because the PNG needs to have alpha channel enabled.
    When I attempt to save the file as a new version, the "alpha channel" option is greyed out. How can I save the file with the alpha channel enabled?

    Hi,
    You might want to visit this thread for more info on iMovie's handling of transparency:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=13123097
    It sounds like iMovie converts the PNG to a JPG internally for some cases (fit, crop, Ken Burns effect).
    regards,
    steve

Maybe you are looking for

  • Purchase Requisition Release Problem

    Hi All, I have a release procedure set up, and the strategy pulls up correctly when a PR is made.  When I view collective release from ME55, the PR's show up, and I am able to release line items from that screen.  However, when viewing the PR from ME

  • Trouble with creating an image sequence in QT Pro 7.4.

    I'm having trouble creating an image sequence in QT Pro 7.4(Windows XP). I have a folder containing a JPEG sequence (alternative a PICT-Image sequenz). I Open image sequence, choose the image-frequency and choose the first image, but QT created only

  • Printing 'ledger' is grayed out

    I found this problem in a couple of archived discussions, but I couldn't find an answer. I recently had my work computer upgraded from an old imac to a macbook with snowleopard. Everyone in the office is able to use the printer from a shared network,

  • Problem in Using Collections as Web Parameters

    Hello, I have tried to use ArrayList and Map variables to pass as web parameter in oc4j(10.1.3.1.0). The interesting this is that, in my web method return type object, if i am declaring a variable of type Map or List, and the variable name is all in

  • Planning and Drill Through Reports

    Hi all. I have a planning application and want to build drill through reports (Planning v11.1.1.3) I wanted to know is it possible to use an already existing cube in essbase to create drill through reports. Please let me know in case you have any sug