Encryption for gateways

Is there any form of encryption option available to secure the trasfer of data while using a Transparent gateway?
Since transparent gateways use ODBC's from my understanding, I am guessing that the ODBC would have to be able to encrypt/secure the data.
Thanks

It could be because that is not the IP of your router. Open cmd and type ipconfig. Post back with the default gateway address.

Similar Messages

SSL encryption for Apex 4.1

Hi Guys,
I am trying to set up SSL encryption for my local install.
I am running APEX 4.1 in Windows 7 (32 bit) , Oracle XE 11G with embedded plsql gateway setup.
The APEX documentation I looked at that deals with SSL:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23903_01/doc/doc.41/e21678/adm_mg_service_set.htm#AEADM297
instructs to turn HTTPS on in APEX_ADMIN (Internal schema) under security.
It didn't work as APEX was visible still under http://localhost:8080/apex and using HTTPS gave page not found error. On top of that It locked out my Admin account for INTERNAL workspace. So I had to switch it back via SQL query in SQL plus.
From limited experience in doing something similar in Tomcat, I believe one needs certificates etc before proceeding with this.
Anyone who has done this before, can you please point to a any documenation/blog post, tutorial etc that shows how its done? Many thanks.

Hi,
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17781_01/install.112/e18802/toc.htm#BABGCDJJ
>
HTTPS is not supported natively with the HTTP listener built into Oracle Database XE. If you want HTTPS support, use an alternative Web listener, such as Apache, that does provide HTTPS support, and provide proxies for the URLs provided by Oracle Database XE.
>
Regards,
Jari
http://dbswh.webhop.net/dbswh/f?p=BLOG:HOME:0
Edited by: jarola on Jan 25, 2012 9:42 AM
That APEX instance admin parameter you have change do not enable HTTPS. It require that you use HTTPS on your web listener.
Here is how reverse HTTPS Requirement for APEX instance admin
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23903_01/doc/doc.41/e21678/adm_mg_service_set.htm#autoId17

Encryption for WRT54GS

Hello all,
I have a WRT54GS v7. I do not have access to the setup CD (somehow I lost it).
I need to do an encryption for my wireless network.
I tried logging in on the router page on 192.168.1.1, however, everytime I try to go to this page, I am not allowed.
It is giving me 'Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage'.
Any suggestions please?
TIA

It could be because that is not the IP of your router. Open cmd and type ipconfig. Post back with the default gateway address.

SPA3000 F/W 3.1.20(GW) last digit repetition within the dial plan is not working for gateway 0-4

H/W: SPA3000
F/W: 3.1.20(GW)
Problem: The last digit repetition within the dial plan is not working for gateway 0-4.
Line 1 Dial Plan: (****|<#,xx.<:@gw1>|1747xxxxxxxx.<:@gw1>)
Dial "17474743246#" which works for gw1.
Dial "#17474743246" which also works for gw1.
Dial "17474743246" which doesn't work and actually goes through VoIP 1 but not gw1.
It results in I have to specify a fixed number of digits for gw0-gw4 in the dial plan or it won't works. This could be very difficult for international calls.
Is there any way to specify Interdigit Short Timer with <:@gw0>?
BTW, it's strange that I have to include (****) in the dial plan to enter IVR. Without it I can't even hear any sound coming from gw1 (SIPphone). Maybe the SPA needs a factory reset. The test dial plan might look like,
S:4,(****|*xxx.|[2-9]|xxxxx|*0<:@gw1>|1747xxxxxxx<:@gw1>|1408xxxxxxx<:@gw0>|xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.!)
The last barring sequence "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx!" is to make sure the Interdigit Short Timer works after the last digit dialed otherwise the number will be transmitted immediately which is not preferred.

IMHO , if there's a need for you to include *** on the dial plan to enter the IVR menu there might be a need to reset the unit.
I believe that you can set the interdigit timer by including that on the dial plan ie: xxxxS0 just like on a hotline, i just never had a chance to try including that syntax when invoking gw0 on the dial plan , but i guess you may give it a try.

A Background job in one of the step delays due to awaiting for Gateway

Hi,
We have the month-end jobs executing in our Production systems every last week of month
It was observed that, one BGD job took 30-45 mins delay to finish.
- In one of the steps, there is Parallel processing with 56 DIA work processes across 4 Application servers out of 6.
- It was observed that all these 56 processes were showing status ON HOLD (Reason RFC) when we checked.
- I went to the BGD job process (sm51) to see if the job is executing
- I saw the message - further awaiting for Gateway XXXX (Prod server)
- I checked in SM59 and all RFCs were OK
- Even in SMGW everything was OK
Please help me to find what exactly is the reason for the delays due to Gateways
Thanks & Regards,
Sameer

Hi Ashish,
The BGD job running on one of the work process indicated - "Waiting for Gateway XXXX (Prod system)"
Here when I checked the 56 DIA work processes, it indicated - ON HOLD & Status - RFC.
I need to know more on the Gateway mechanisim in this. Hope the problem was in the gateway connection for a temporary proceess
Else the system was OK. No improper functioning was observed.
Need to explore more on this.
Regards,
Sameer

Technical Details: The website does not support encryption for the page you are viewing. Information sent over the internet withour encryption can be seen by other people while it is in transit

Technical Details:
The website does not support encryption for the page you are viewing.
Information sent over the internet withour encryption can be seen by other people while it is in transit
== This happened ==
Not sure how often
== started few days ago. previously never happened before.

I was loading a website, it then stated as below, it wasnt any of the problems stated below.
SERVER NOT FOUND
# Check the address for typing errors such as
ww.example.com instead of
www.example.com
# If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network
connection.
# If your computer or network is protected by a firewall or proxy, make sure
that Firefox is permitted to access the Web.
Thus i checked the Page Info, it states that:
Security Info on page:
'''This website does not supply ownership information.
Connection not Encrypted.'''
Technical Details:
The website does not support encryption for the page you are viewing.
Information sent over the internet withour encryption can be seen by other people while it is in transit

WPA/WPA2 encryption for (WiFi) Ad-hoc?

Is there any Apps that can create WPA/WPA2 encryption for (WiFi) Ad-hoc connection beside default WEP? I'm aware that WEP is not as good as WPA/WPA2 encryption......... i'm using my neighbours WiFi connection for free...

If you want WPA, then your key_mgmt and pairwise are definitely wrong. I'd say don't set key_mgmt, pairwise and group at all, the defaults are ok.

Error invoking CFC for gateway

Am getting the following error while invoking the event
gateway
"Error invoking CFC for gateway myGateway: Event Handler
Exception. An exception occurred when invoking a event handler
method from Application.cfc The method name is: onRequestStart."
Please advice

I am getting an error like this when my eventgateway gets invoked for directorywatch:
Error invoking CFC for gateway watchInboundFiles: null {GATEWAYTYPE={FileWatcher},ORIGINATORID={},CFCMETHOD={onDelete},DATA={{FILENAME={/Users/y oosafabdulla/Sites/bahuvlintbeaches-staging/int/core/internationalBeaches/iptv/dw/1_vod_xm l.cfc},TYPE={DELETE}}},CFCPATH={/Users/yoosafabdulla/Sites/bahuvlintbeaches-staging/int/co re/internationalBeaches/iptv/dw/directory_watch.cfc},GATEWAYID={watchInboundFiles}}.
I just want to dump the cfevent data into a text file.

128 bit encryption for e-qip????? Is it possiable to open this site with version 33.0

As ive seen in other posts Im having a problem with the e-qip website. It states that I dont have 128 bit encryption. Im running firefox 33.0 It has a walk through on how to configure firefox to work with the site but the directions are obviously old and I dont have any of the controls they are adjusting!

The Mozilla browsers which include Firefox has supported 256-bit even encryption for a long time now.
The issue could perhaps be the e-qip site is still looking for the old obsolete '''U''' in the useragent which was used to specify the encryption strength of 128-bit though 256-bit has been supported for a long while already at time by Mozilla applications. This "U" was removed in Firefox useragent as of 4.0 which was released March 22nd, 2011. The old 3.6.x was the last to have it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_agent#Encryption_strength_notations
https://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/09/final-user-agent-string-for-firefox-4/

Which encryption for the remote control of zenwork use?

Which encryption for the remote control of zenwork use?

Well, score is now 2:100, but it ain't over until the fat lady sings... :)))
Denis
"Marcus Breiden" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:fgav7820vql0$.[email protected]..
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:42:55 GMT, Shaun Pond wrote:
>
>> oops, my mistake - as far as I know it's proprietary
>
> mark that in the calendar Denis!!
>
>
> --
>
>
> Marcus Breiden
>
> If you are asked to email me information please change -- to - in my
> e-mail
> address.
> The content of this mail is my private and personal opinion.
> http://www.edu-magic.net

Request and Reponse Pipelines for Gateway

I had posted this in SOA Suite forum, but as it is web service related, I hope that I can get an answer on it here:
I understand the meaning of request and response pipelines for client and server Agents but I am not sure I know the same for Gateways.
Suppose that I have service A and service B and both are registered with this gateway.
Does request pipeline executes when service A is called? what about when service A makes a request to service B (calls it) ? (how can I simulate the work of a client agent with gateway here?)
Regards
Farbod

When you register the service A and Service B with the Gateway, the actual URL will now be X and Y
i.e. something like
http://myservice.com/Gateway/SID00234?WSDL
(which could map to /Service/A.asmx?WSDL)
Now when you invoke the service you are actually invoking the URL that teh gateway provided (acting as Reverse Proxy).
In your code, when Service A is making a call to Service B, you actually should change the URL to point to the one in Gateway i.e /SID00235?WSDL)
As far as your question on simulating gateway, let me take a shot at that.
The purpose of Client agent gateway is to set the security headers (UserNametoken, etc) by the Client Application so that when the service receives that you can validate the credentials.
Let me walk through the steps.
Assume you have ServiceA - ServiceA.asmx?WSDL
You register the service in Gateway - new URL will be SID00342?WSDL
You set the policy to validate the credentials that will set by your Client Agent.
Lets assume you want to validate Signature and you will configure policy to validate Signature.
Now at your client application you would use Client Agent to Generate the signature.
Instead of Client Agent what you can do is,
Register the SID00342?WSDL in gateway again
This will generate a new URL - SID00343?WSDL
Apply the Policy here, in the Request pipeline
you can add step to Generate signature
Now when you invoke this new service from the TOols/Test page,
SID00343
You will see in the log, that SID00343 generated Signature
on SID00342 log you will see it accepted messagae with Signature and then will validate the signature.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Ram

Initialization of encryption for the session failed.

Everytime I try to remote control into a machine that has the adaptive agent installed I get an error that states "Initialization of encryption for the session failed. Unable to proceed." I have tried to remote into both Windows XP and 7 machines with no luck. I have confirmed that the zcm certificate is a trusted certificate with the client. The server time and the client times are also in sync. Any thoughts??

Try This.........
Change AllowedTimeDiff from 10 to 120 in serverstats.xml.
Then restart your services.
This was changed from 10 to 120 in ZCM 10.3.0
I just found out it was changed back to 10 in ZCM 11, not sure why.
It's really hard to spot a 10 second TimeSynch diff.
Might be something else, but this could be it.
On 4/18/2011 1:06 PM, rhedgecorth wrote:
>
> Everytime I try to remote control into a machine that has the adaptive
> agent installed I get an error that states "Initialization of encryption
> for the session failed. Unable to proceed." I have tried to remote
> into both Windows XP and 7 machines with no luck. I have confirmed that
> the zcm certificate is a trusted certificate with the client. The
> server time and the client times are also in sync. Any thoughts??
>
>
Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
Novell Knowledge Partner
Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.

HT201269 I am trying to remove the backup encrypt for my Iphone 4 but the itunes ask for the password and basically I have not set any password before ...!!! Please note that I entered the password for my apple account and also it did not work, how i can

I am trying to remove the backup encrypt for my Iphone 4 but the itunes ask for the password and basically I have not set any password before ...!!! Please note that I entered the password for my apple account and also it did not work, how i can reset it?

You can't reset it. If you don't konw the password then you can't use that backup

Itunes hangs when trying to uncheck encryption for iphone backup.

Itunes hangs when trying to uncheck encryption for iPhone backup. The iTunes software becomes unusable and unresponsive after entering correct password (only set up today) All i want to do is backup my iPhone before trying update to the latest ios. I have tried uninstalling all Apple software and re-installing, all unsuccessfully - still have the same problem! Essentially i have to use ctr+alt+del to even close the iTunes program, so I'm assuming there must be some sort of corruption with the encryption / password setup - neither of which have been used at all, all previous backups are on iCloud and don't have encryption. I obviously don't want to attempt a backup with these sort of issues occurring as i don't think i could trust it. Can anyone suggest a way to fix the problem, Ive tried googling all afternoon without any success - most answers I can find relate to people who have lost their passwords but don't have the software issues i am having.

Further to the issue - i thought I'd try and run an encrypted backup for fun (since that's the only option available atm) and the backup hangs as well - in fact it doesn't even technically start other than saying its backing up. The progress bar never moves at all?

Anyone using SecureDoc Full-Disk Encryption for Mac from WinMagic?

Currently I am using Mac OS X v10.5 on a MBP and want to upgrade to Snow Leopard. I use PGP full disk encryption.
I do not want to wait anymore for PGP v10 before I can upgrade to Snow Leopard. In my search for a replacement for PGP I found SecureDoc Full-Disk Encryption for Mac from WinMagic.
https://www.winmagic.com/products/full-disk-encryption-for-mac
They claim to be Snow Leopard compatible
https://www.winmagic.com/kw/download.php?url=/datasheets/securedocmac_brochure20090925a.pdf
I have two questions:
1) Does anyone have experience with SecureDoc Full-Disk Encryption for Mac from WinMagic?
2) Where can I buy one? PGP has a store where I ordered my copy of the software. But I can't find a store anywhere for SecureDoc. With some trouble I found a reseller in the Netherlands, but they don't reply to any questions.

I am currently testing a trial license from Checkpoint Full Disk Encryption.
http://www.checkpoint.com/products/datasecurity/pc/index.html
The company where I work is a Checkpoint reseller, and normally only has dealings with other companies, not end users. But we arranged a trial license and I can buy a single user license Checkpoint Full Disk Encryption if the test proves Checkpoint Full Disk Encryption is a good solution.
I created a bootable usb disk with Snow Lepoard on it. But I was unable to install FDE on it. After reboot I only get a blank screen, that's it. Probably it isn't supported to boot from a full disk encrypted removable drive, I can understand that.
I can't create a virtual Snow Leopard machine (legal reasons) to test it on. And all FDE solutions I found aren't compatible with Mac Server, which is a shame because you can virtualize Mac Server legally.
So now I am planning to change the hard-disk of my MBP this evening with another hard-disk to test Checkpoint FDE there. I don't want to upgrade my current Leopard installation to Snow Leopard only to discover it doesn't work as expected. I could of-course use my current installation and when it doesn't work rollback to a timemachine backup, but before that I have to decrypt my disk and uninstall PGP witch will take 1-2 days, and encrypt again when the test is over. Not pratical.
I will let you know how the test with Checkpoint Full Disk Encryption went!

Encryption for gateways

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for