End-of-data rejected: user not permitted to relay

I get this error whenever I try to respond to an email from an employee using our company email.  I don't get the message when responding using other email programs, just when responding using email addresses with same url.
How do I fix this?

Hi Sidney
I have an email account experiencing the same issue: [email protected]
Incoming mail is fine, but outgoing mail has suddenly stopped working always getting the same error: "adobe bc email, the server response was: <END OF MESSAGE>: End-of-data rejected: user not permitted to relay"
Can you advise or correct for me please?
Regards
David

Similar Messages

  • Canot send email Error SMTP: [554] 5.7.1 END-OF-MESSAGE : End-of-data rejected: user not permitted to relay

    please help me with this error

    Experiencing same event "<END-OF-MESSAGE>: End-of-data rejected: user not permitted to relay" on newest email account. Had not seen for first 3 days, now suddenly, every attempt. Account has sent less than 30 emails total in it's lifetime.
    Account is [email protected]
    Please advise, and thank you.

  • SMTP Error: [554] 5.7.1 END-OF-MESSAGE : End-of-data rejected: user not permitted to relay

    HI
    I am getting the following error on 3 of my clients accounts when trying to send out messages. We had a spam on the email address about a month ago and this has effected the emails now not working.
    Please could someone urgently assist the client did not send the spam it looked like his email address was used by someone else. We have reset all the passwords but now we cant use it.
    the email addresses are:
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    Please can someone assist me urgently as the client cannot send and the info account cannot send or receive.
    thanks Marelise

    Hi Marelise,
    For now, I have enabled these accounts, but in such cases, it is recommended to reach out to chat support or submit a ticket to get faster resolution.
    Do let me know if you have any question.

  • Update 30 unusable. EVERY page: kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6174] at virtual address 0x128dea000, protections wer

    EVERY page that tries to open causes FF to become Not Responding:
    6/11/14 4:50:05 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6174] at virtual address 0x128dea000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 4:50:13 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6174] at virtual address 0x128deb000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 4:50:17 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6174] at virtual address 0x128dec000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 4:50:21 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6174] at virtual address 0x128ded000, protections were read-write
    etc. Forever.

    Nope. After turning it off, FF became NOT RESPONDING. Restarted, and happened again. Using Safe Mode now.
    6/11/14 7:51:10 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x117b86000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:12 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x117b87000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:14 PM Firewall[61] 33300 Deny ICMP:8.0 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 in via en1
    6/11/14 7:51:17 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to UDP 192.168.1.2:51382 from 4.2.2.3:53
    6/11/14 7:51:17 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to UDP 192.168.1.2:51585 from 4.2.2.3:53
    6/11/14 7:51:17 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to UDP 192.168.1.2:50260 from 4.2.2.3:53
    6/11/14 7:51:17 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to UDP 192.168.1.2:58396 from 4.2.2.3:53
    6/11/14 7:51:18 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to UDP 192.168.1.2:64932 from 4.2.2.3:53
    6/11/14 7:51:18 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to UDP 192.168.1.2:62508 from 4.2.2.3:53
    6/11/14 7:51:30 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x12eaac000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:30 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to UDP 192.168.1.2:55176 from 4.2.2.3:53
    SNIP SOME CHARACTERS FOR 10k LIMIT IN POST
    HOW THE HELL CAN I HAVE "EXCEEDED THE NUMBER OF ANSWERS THAT CAN BE POSTED IN A GIVEN AMOUNT OF TIME when every attempt was blocked for being over 10k characters? how the hell are you supposed to EDIT these?
    PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to UDP 192.168.1.2:56995 from 4.2.2.3:53
    6/11/14 7:51:32 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63351 from 50.18.44.24:80
    6/11/14 7:51:32 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to UDP 192.168.1.2:61082 from 4.2.2.3:53
    6/11/14 7:51:33 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to UDP 192.168.1.2:50233 from 4.2.2.3:53
    6/11/14 7:51:33 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63359 from 173.194.68.191:80
    6/11/14 7:51:33 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63361 from 173.194.68.191:80
    6/11/14 7:51:33 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63355 from 74.125.228.3:80
    6/11/14 7:51:33 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to UDP 192.168.1.2:62761 from 4.2.2.3:53
    6/11/14 7:51:33 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63358 from 173.194.68.191:80
    6/11/14 7:51:34 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to UDP 192.168.1.2:62393 from 4.2.2.3:53
    6/11/14 7:51:34 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x12eaaf000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:34 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63349 from 93.99.92.186:80
    6/11/14 7:51:34 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63351 from 50.18.44.24:80
    6/11/14 7:51:34 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63347 from 93.99.92.186:80
    6/11/14 7:51:35 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x12eaaf000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:35 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63348 from 93.99.92.186:80
    6/11/14 7:51:36 PM Firewall[61] 33300 Deny ICMP:8.0 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 in via en1
    6/11/14 7:51:37 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63359 from 173.194.68.191:80
    6/11/14 7:51:37 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63361 from 173.194.68.191:80
    6/11/14 7:51:37 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63355 from 74.125.228.3:80
    6/11/14 7:51:37 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63358 from 173.194.68.191:80
    6/11/14 7:51:38 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x12eaaf000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:38 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63351 from 50.18.44.24:80
    6/11/14 7:51:40 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63349 from 93.99.92.186:80
    6/11/14 7:51:40 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63347 from 93.99.92.186:80
    6/11/14 7:51:41 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63348 from 93.99.92.186:80
    6/11/14 7:51:41 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x12eab0000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:42 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x12eab0000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:43 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x12eab1000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:44 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x12eab1000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:45 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x12eab1000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:45 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63359 from 173.194.68.191:80
    6/11/14 7:51:45 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63361 from 173.194.68.191:80
    6/11/14 7:51:45 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63355 from 74.125.228.3:80
    6/11/14 7:51:45 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63358 from 173.194.68.191:80
    6/11/14 7:51:46 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to TCP 192.168.1.2:63351 from 50.18.44.24:80
    6/11/14 7:51:50 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x11b9b7000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:51 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x11b9b7000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:53 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x11b9b7000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:54 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x11b9b8000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:56 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x11b9b8000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:57 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x11b9b8000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:51:57 PM Firewall[61] 33300 Deny ICMP:8.0 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 in via en1
    6/11/14 7:51:59 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x11b9b9000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:52:00 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x11b9b9000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:52:01 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x11b9b9000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:52:03 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x11b9ba000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:52:04 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x11b9ba000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:52:07 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x11b9bb000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:52:14 PM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 6634] at virtual address 0x11b9bc000, protections were read-write
    6/11/14 7:52:18 PM [0x0-0x310310].org.mozilla.firefox[6634] [6644] ###!!! ABORT: Aborting on channel error.: file /builds/slave/rel-m-rel-osx64_bld-0000000000/build/ipc/glue/MessageChannel.cpp, line 1522
    6/11/14 7:52:18 PM [0x0-0x310310].org.mozilla.firefox[6634] [6644] ###!!! ABORT: Aborting on channel error.: file /builds/slave/rel-m-rel-osx64_bld-0000000000/build/ipc/glue/MessageChannel.cpp, line 1522
    6/11/14 7:52:18 PM com.apple.launchd.peruser.501[112] ([0x0-0x310310].org.mozilla.firefox[6634]) Exited: Terminated
    6/11/14 7:52:19 PM Firewall[61] 33300 Deny ICMP:8.0 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.2 in via en1
    6/11/14 7:52:25 PM kernel firefox (map: 0x17d5e0a4) triggered DYLD shared region unnest for map: 0x17d5e0a4, region 0x7fff81000000->0x7fff81200000. While not abnormal for debuggers, this increases system memory footprint until the target exits.
    6/11/14 7:52:28 PM ReportCrash[6652] Saved crash report for plugin-container[6644] version ??? (1.0) to /Users/hal9000/Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/plugin-container_2014-06-11-195228_Hal-9000s-MBP.crash
    6/11/14 7:52:29 PM Firewall[61] Stealth Mode connection attempt to UDP 192.168.1.2:60331 from 4.2.2.3:53

  • Restart becomes Not Responding, kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 5397] at virtual address 0x130656000, protections were

    Trying to restart (after upgrade to Mac 30.0) and load previous session (via an addon session manager)
    FF becomes "Not Responding" and Console shows repeated lines of:
    6/11/14 1:08:15 AM kernel Data/Stack execution not permitted: firefox[pid 5397] at virtual address 0x130656000, protections were read-write

    Discussion continues here: https://support.mozilla.org/questions/1005647

  • CRM User not permitted to 'Copy To'

    Forum,
    In SAP B1 2007A. If a user is licensed as a CRM user, despite having authorisations set for all things sales, a user finds they are not permitted to 'Copy to' a delivery. Is this the case?
    Regards,
    Juan

    Hi Juan,
    What document you are trying to create by using 'Copy to' of Delivery?
    Invoice documents are not allowed for CRM users!!!
    If you want to make Return document, try by using 'Copy From' function from Return document.
    Regards,
    Bala

  • How to get last 24 months data (if user not enter any kind of information)

    Hi all,
    I am want a report such that
    1. if user does not enter months he has to get last 24 months data(from current month)
    eg1.
    Sales
    currentmonth     300
    currentmonth-1  400
    currentmonth-20 500
    2. if user  enter months he has to get required months data(from current month)
    eg1.assume that user entered the interval of last two months.
    Sales
    currentmonth     300
    currentmonth-1  400.
    friends please me in desinging this query.
    It's very urgent,waiting for responses.
    Thanks,
    James.

    Hi james,
    1. if user does not enter months he has to get last 24 months data(from current month)
    ANS: U have to create variable Of  Currentmonth with The following
             Process Type: SAP Exit
             Variable Represent: Single value
            Variable Entry: Optional
    Check chekboxes for <b>Ready for Input</b> & Can be change in Query navigation.
    b) After this u have to give offsets by restricting this variable
    2. if user enter months he has to get required months data(from current month)
    ANS:
    For this U have to use Process Type: User-exit( User Entry)
    & After that specify the offsets by restriction.
    Thanks,
    kiran.
    Message was edited by:
            kiran manyam

  • Post 03- 10 Migration multiple Relay not Permitted errors from recipient

    Hello all - I recently just started a new job in an organization that just recently upgraded from an Exchange 2003 environment, to Exchange 2010.  Just within the past week, we finally took down our last 2003 system.  Since then, we have received
    a good number of bounce back messages from recipient servers with various specific error messages, but with a common theme "smtp relay not permitted".  What's strange is at my last employer, we migrated from 2003 to 2007 and I recall having a similar
    situation, but I can't for the life of me recall what the solution was.
    So far, through a few hours of Google searching, all I have found are sources suggesting that this issue is a recipient server config problem, but I have a very hard time believing that it isn't a problem on my end, with this many of essentially the same
    errors popping up.  Also - I have noticed that if a user attempts to re-send an email to the recipient that previously bounced back, it will work.
    I'm not sure what sort of config info from my server / local network I should share here, but i'll gladly share whatever may be necessary.
    Here are a few of the bounce message that we have received (names/email addresses removed)
    From: Microsoft Outlook 
    Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 8:28 AM
    To: name_removed
    Subject: Undeliverable: FW: Dodson upkeep
    pop-borzoi.atl.sa.earthlink.net rejected your message to the following e-mail addresses:
    (recipient removed)
    pop-borzoi.atl.sa.earthlink.net gave this error:
    Authentication required. Help at http://www.earthlink.net/go/emailsettings 
    A problem occurred during the delivery of this message to this e-mail address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.
    Diagnostic information for administrators:
    Generating server: my_server
    (recipient removed)
    pop-borzoi.atl.sa.earthlink.net #550 Authentication required. Help at http://www.earthlink.net/go/emailsettings ##
    From: Microsoft Outlook 
    Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 9:47 AM
    To: name removed
    Subject: Undeliverable: RE: open invoice
    mustang.ws9100.net rejected your message to the following e-mail addresses:
    recipient removed
    mustang.ws9100.net gave this error:
    webmail.twgi.net (myserver.twgi.net) [65.242.24.100]:40159 is currently not permitted to relay through this server. Perhaps you have not logged into the pop/imap server in the last 30 minutes or do not have SMTP Authentication turned on in your email client. 
    A problem occurred during the delivery of this message to this e-mail address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.
    Diagnostic information for administrators:
    Generating server: myserver.twgi.net
    recipient_removed
    mustang.ws9100.net #550-webmail.twgi.net (myserver.twgi.net) [65.242.24.100]:40159 is currently not 550-permitted to relay through this server. Perhaps you have not logged into 550-the pop/imap server in the last 30 minutes or do not have SMTP 550 Authentication
    turned on in your email client. ##
    From: Microsoft Outlook 
    Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 5:10 PM
    To: name removed
    Subject: Undeliverable: message subject removed
    UNUSED-216-37-170-254.UNUSED.epix.net rejected your message to the following e-mail addresses:
    recipient removed @cargas.com
    UNUSED-216-37-170-254.UNUSED.epix.net gave this error:
    Unable to relay for [email protected]
    Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator, the address may only accept e-mail from certain senders, or another restriction may be preventing delivery.
    Diagnostic information for administrators:
    Generating server: myserver.twgi.net
    [email protected]
    UNUSED-216-37-170-254.UNUSED.epix.net #550 5.7.1 Unable to relay for [email protected] ##
    From: Microsoft Outlook 
    Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 12:31 PM
    To: name removed
    Subject: Undeliverable: RE: SMO Destwin Implementation
    cpanel-2.host.chi1.int-i.net rejected your message to the following e-mail addresses:
    recipient [email protected]
    cpanel-2.host.chi1.int-i.net gave this error:
    webmail.twgi.net (myserver.twgi.net) [65.242.24.100]:27609 is currently not permitted to relay through this server. Perhaps you have not logged into the pop/imap server in the last 30 minutes or do not have SMTP Authentication turned on in your email client. 
    A problem occurred during the delivery of this message to this e-mail address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.
    Diagnostic information for administrators:
    Generating server: twgiex.twgi.net
    [email protected]
    cpanel-2.host.chi1.int-i.net #550-webmail.twgi.net (myserver.twgi.net) [65.242.24.100]:27609 is currently not 550-permitted to relay through this server. Perhaps you have not logged into 550-the pop/imap server in the last 30 minutes or do not have SMTP
    550 Authentication turned on in your email client. ##
    From: Microsoft Outlook 
    Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 5:29 PM
    To: name removed
    Subject: Undeliverable: FW: Landscaping
    host.clearimaging4.com rejected your message to the following e-mail addresses:
    [email protected]
    host.clearimaging4.com gave this error:
    sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts; no valid cert for gatewaying (#5.7.1) 
    A problem occurred during the delivery of this message to this e-mail address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.
    Diagnostic information for administrators:
    Generating server: myserver.twgi.net
    [email protected]
    host.clearimaging4.com #553 sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts; no valid cert for gatewaying (#5.7.1) ##
    From: Microsoft Outlook 
    Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 8:39 AM
    To: name removed
    Subject: Undeliverable: FW: Proof of Insurance request
    n22.c07.mtsvc.net rejected your message to the following e-mail addresses:
    [email protected]
    n22.c07.mtsvc.net gave this error:
    relay not permitted 
    A problem occurred during the delivery of this message to this e-mail address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk.
    Diagnostic information for administrators:
    Generating server: myserver.twgi.net
    [email protected]
    n22.c07.mtsvc.net #550 relay not permitted ##

    Also, i FINALLY have an excerpt from our send logfile that matches up to an email bounce:
    Bounce message:
    From: Microsoft Outlook
    Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2011 9:43 AM
    To: sender removed
    Subject: Undeliverable: RE: Load of gas
    server1.cbayhosting.com rejected your message to the following e-mail addresses:
    recipient removed ([email protected])
    server1.cbayhosting.com gave this error:
    <[email protected]>... Relaying denied. Proper authentication required.
    Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator, the address may only accept e-mail from certain senders, or another restriction may be preventing delivery.
    Diagnostic information for administrators:
    Generating server: myserver.twgi.net
    [email protected]
    server1.cbayhosting.com #550 5.7.1 <[email protected]>... Relaying denied. Proper authentication required. ##
    Send connector log file:
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.761Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,2,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,"220 server1.cbayhosting.com ESMTP Sendmail 8.13.7/8.13.7; Sun, 8 May 2011 09:43:02 -0400",
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.761Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,3,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,>,EHLO myserver.twgi.net,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.761Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37F,0,,64.18.4.10:25,*,,attempting to connect
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.793Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,4,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,"250-server1.cbayhosting.com Hello webmail.twgi.net [65.242.24.100], pleased to meet you",
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.793Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,5,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,250-ENHANCEDSTATUSCODES,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.793Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,6,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,250-PIPELINING,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.793Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,7,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,250-8BITMIME,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.793Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,8,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,250-SIZE,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.793Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,9,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,250-DSN,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.793Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,10,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,250-ETRN,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.793Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,11,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,250-AUTH LOGIN PLAIN,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.793Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,12,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,250-DELIVERBY,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.793Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,13,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,250 HELP,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.793Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,14,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,*,2722844,sending message
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.793Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,15,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,>,MAIL FROM:[email protected] SIZE=8054,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.793Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,16,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,>,RCPT TO:<[email protected]>,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.855Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37F,1,15.32.0.46:9324,64.18.4.10:25,+,,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.886Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,17,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,250 2.1.0 <[email protected]>... Sender ok,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.886Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,18,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,550 5.7.1 <[email protected]>... Relaying denied. Proper authentication required.,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.902Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,19,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,>,QUIT,
    2011-05-08T13:43:01.918Z,Send mail to Internet,08CDAB5926F2B37D,20,15.32.0.46:9323,69.94.111.23:25,<,221 2.0.0 server1.cbayhosting.com closing connection,
    It looks like the address that exchange is attempting to connect to, to send to chesapeake.net is at IP: 69.94.111.23. However, MX lookup for chesapeaeke.net returns mx: mxsrv.chesapeake.net 216.240.101.22

  • BPC Detail error/reject log not created in the PrivatePub/user/temp folder

    Hi,
    We have a custom import package that imports data from a comma seperated txt file in to BPC. If all the data members in the data file are valid dimension members the package is successful and the package log file is created in the PrivatePub/user/Temp folder. But if there are any rejects the reject log is not getting created under the temp folder and moreover the package status is "Error". The package log is created but the reject log is not. The Webfolders has the full share permissions.
    The same package runs fine in our Test environment and creates the package log and reject log.
    We are on BPC 5.1 SP3.
    Is there a configuration that is missing.
    Thanks in advance.
    Swaroop

    I'm pretty sure that when you do not explicitly indicate a transformation file, a default file (import.xls I think?) is used.
    Also, there are a number of temp files & variables that must be created in the MODIFYSCRIPT variable, and certain conversion tasks that are part of the standard import process. You can see the proper syntax in the sample import pacakges.
    If you've created a new package of your own, you may be missing some key pieces. If you don't understand what all the pieces are in the sample packages (and why you don't need them), you should start by debugging with one of them, and then see what you need to add back into your package.
    I'd normally recommend to start with the sample import package, and only modify it if necessary, and as little as possible.
    Last thought - file permission... does the user running the package (not the end user logged into BPC, but the BPC data manager user, which I believe is the "USER" (not admin or sysadmin) set up during the server install) have appropriate access rights to that network share where the data file is located? Try changing it to a local path, and copy the test.txt to that location.

  • User weblogic is not permitted to boot the server

    Hi,
    I am new to OES and after running the configtool, creating the ASIAuthorizationProvider and ASIRoleMapperProvider (both has Defaul Identity Directory: wls_dir and Application Deployment Parent: //app/policy/wls_app), binding the SSM, i get this error when starting the WLS admin server:
    15:33:26.312 EVENT Starting Jetty/4.2.25
    15:33:26.859 WARN!! Delete existing temp dir C:\BEA_HOME_10\ales32-ssm\wls-ssm\i
    nstance\wls_ssm\work\jar_temp\Jetty__8000__ for WebApplicationContext[/,jar:file
    :/C:/BEA_HOME_10/ales32-ssm/wls-ssm/webapp/arme.war!/]
    15:33:30.515 EVENT Started WebApplicationContext[,ARMEService]
    15:33:32.562 EVENT Started SocketListener on 0.0.0.0:8000
    15:33:32.562 EVENT Started org.mortbay.jetty.Server@176bf9e
    ARME is started now
    <Mar 5, 2010 3:33:33 PM SGT> <Notice> <Security> <BEA-090082> <Security initiali
    zing using security realm wls.>
    <Mar 5, 2010 3:33:34 PM SGT> <Critical> <Security> <BEA-090404> <User weblogic i
    s not permitted to boot the server; The server policy may have changed in such a
    way that the user is no longer able to boot the server.Reboot the server with t
    he administrative user account or contact the system administrator to update the
    server policy definitions.>
    <Mar 5, 2010 3:33:34 PM SGT> <Critical> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000386> <Server su
    bsystem failed. Reason: weblogic.security.SecurityInitializationException: User
    weblogic is not permitted to boot the server; The server policy may have changed
    in such a way that the user is no longer able to boot the server.Reboot the ser
    ver with the administrative user account or contact the system administrator to
    update the server policy definitions.
    weblogic.security.SecurityInitializationException: User weblogic is not permitte
    d to boot the server; The server policy may have changed in such a way that the
    user is no longer able to boot the server.Reboot the server with the administrat
    ive user account or contact the system administrator to update the server policy
    definitions.
    at weblogic.security.service.CommonSecurityServiceManagerDelegateImpl.do
    BootAuthorization(Unknown Source)
    at weblogic.security.service.CommonSecurityServiceManagerDelegateImpl.in
    itialize(Unknown Source)
    at weblogic.security.service.SecurityServiceManager.initialize(Unknown S
    ource)
    at weblogic.security.SecurityService.start(SecurityService.java:141)
    at weblogic.t3.srvr.SubsystemRequest.run(SubsystemRequest.java:64)
    Truncated. see log file for complete stacktrace
    >
    <Mar 5, 2010 3:33:34 PM SGT> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server stat
    e changed to FAILED>
    <Mar 5, 2010 3:33:34 PM SGT> <Error> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000383> <A critical s
    ervice failed. The server will shut itself down>
    <Mar 5, 2010 3:33:34 PM SGT> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <BEA-000365> <Server stat
    e changed to FORCE_SHUTTING_DOWN>
    Stopping PointBase server...
    PointBase server stopped.
    from the WLS AdminServer.log:
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:05 PM SGT> <Info> <Socket> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774385687> <BEA-000436> <Allocating 3 reader threads.>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:05 PM SGT> <Info> <Socket> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774385687> <BEA-000446> <Native IO Enabled.>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:06 PM SGT> <Info> <IIOP> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774386531> <BEA-002014> <IIOP subsystem enabled.>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:11 PM SGT> <Info> <Security> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774391656> <BEA-000000> <Starting OpenJPA 1.0.0.1>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:17 PM SGT> <Info> <Security> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774397171> <BEA-090516> <The Authenticator provider has preexisting LDAP data.>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:33 PM SGT> <Info> <Security> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774413421> <BEA-090516> <The CredentialMapper provider has preexisting LDAP data.>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:33 PM SGT> <Info> <Security> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774413500> <BEA-090663> <The DeployableRoleMapper "com.bea.security.providers.authorization.asi.RoleProviderStub" implements the deprecated DeployableRoleProvider interface.>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:33 PM SGT> <Info> <Security> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774413531> <BEA-090662> <The DeployableAuthorizer "com.bea.security.providers.authorization.asi.AuthorizationProviderStub" implements the deprecated DeployableAuthorizationProvider interface.>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:33 PM SGT> <Info> <Security> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774413796> <BEA-090093> <No pre-WLS 8.1 Keystore providers are configured for server AdminServer for security realm wls.>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:33 PM SGT> <Notice> <Security> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774413796> <BEA-090082> <Security initializing using security realm wls.>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:34 PM SGT> <Critical> <Security> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774414234> <BEA-090404> <User weblogic is not permitted to boot the server; The server policy may have changed in such a way that the user is no longer able to boot the server.Reboot the server with the administrative user account or contact the system administrator to update the server policy definitions.>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:34 PM SGT> <Critical> <WebLogicServer> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <main> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774414234> <BEA-000386> <Server subsystem failed. Reason: weblogic.security.SecurityInitializationException: User weblogic is not permitted to boot the server; The server policy may have changed in such a way that the user is no longer able to boot the server.Reboot the server with the administrative user account or contact the system administrator to update the server policy definitions.
    weblogic.security.SecurityInitializationException: User weblogic is not permitted to boot the server; The server policy may have changed in such a way that the user is no longer able to boot the server.Reboot the server with the administrative user account or contact the system administrator to update the server policy definitions.
         at weblogic.security.service.CommonSecurityServiceManagerDelegateImpl.doBootAuthorization(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.security.service.CommonSecurityServiceManagerDelegateImpl.initialize(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.security.service.SecurityServiceManager.initialize(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.security.SecurityService.start(SecurityService.java:141)
         at weblogic.t3.srvr.SubsystemRequest.run(SubsystemRequest.java:64)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:200)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:172)
    >
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:34 PM SGT> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <main> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774414328> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to FAILED>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:34 PM SGT> <Error> <WebLogicServer> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <main> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774414328> <BEA-000383> <A critical service failed. The server will shut itself down>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:34 PM SGT> <Notice> <WebLogicServer> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <main> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774414328> <BEA-000365> <Server state changed to FORCE_SHUTTING_DOWN>
    ####<Mar 5, 2010 3:33:34 PM SGT> <Info> <WebLogicServer> <SGBLM010> <AdminServer> <main> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1267774414359> <BEA-000236> <Stopping execute threads.>
    also, i just noticed that when staring OES admin server i get the following from the logs:
    system_console.log:
    2010-03-05 15:19:04,218 [JettySSLListener1-1] ERROR com.wles.soap.BLM.BlmBindingImpl - getUndistributedAttributeChanges has not been implemented properly.
    2010-03-05 15:27:17,656 [Thread-31] WARN com.bea.security.ssl.axis.AxisClientSocketFactory - Error during SSL handshake; host: SGBLM010, port: 8,000.
    2010-03-05 15:27:17,687 [Thread-31] ERROR com.bea.security.pdws.Distributor - unable to bind unbound arme
    Communication Error:; nested exception is:
         javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Error during SSL handshake; host: SGBLM010, port: 8,000.
    2010-03-05 15:27:17,687 [Thread-31] ERROR com.bea.security.pdws.ARMEGroup - arme group '//bind/wls' error report, policyno = 52:
    2010-03-05 15:27:17,687 [Thread-31] ERROR com.bea.security.pdws.ARMEGroup - arme 'asi.null.ARME.wls_ssm.asi.SGBLM010':
    2010-03-05 15:27:33,015 [Thread-32] WARN com.bea.security.ssl.axis.AxisClientSocketFactory - Error during SSL handshake; host: SGBLM010, port: 8,000.
    2010-03-05 15:27:33,015 [Thread-32] ERROR com.bea.security.pdws.Distributor - unable to bind unbound arme
    Communication Error:; nested exception is:
         javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Error during SSL handshake; host: SGBLM010, port: 8,000.
    WLESWebLogic.wrapper.log:
    INFO | jvm 1 | 2010/03/05 15:27:17 | Processing AxisFault, cause: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Error during SSL handshake; host: SGBLM010, port: 8,000.
    INFO | jvm 1 | 2010/03/05 15:27:17 | Re-throwing the fault...
    INFO | jvm 1 | 2010/03/05 15:27:18 | error.jsp: Client has closed the connection, error not reported to client.
    INFO | jvm 1 | 2010/03/05 15:27:18 | error.jsp: The exception is: com.bea.wles.management.console.utils.NestedJspException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error
    INFO | jvm 1 | 2010/03/05 15:27:33 | Processing AxisFault, cause: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Error during SSL handshake; host: SGBLM010, port: 8,000.
    INFO | jvm 1 | 2010/03/05 15:27:33 | Re-throwing the fault...
    although, it seems that the OES admin server is up since i am able to access the OES admin console.
    i have tried playing around the policies to grant the "weblogic" the priviliges for an Admin but is still get the same issue. Although, when i try to distribute the changes in the policy, "ASI ( Policy for entire Oracle Entitlements Server system ) " still appears in the list of changes.
    any thoughts on what the problem is? is there a way to force the distribution of the policy? maybe through the command prompt or other console?
    Edited by: user9056644 on Mar 5, 2010 12:02 AM

    Have you applied CP2 or CP3 to OES? There were enhancements that allows these policies to be scoped within an organization. I only ask to help guide you on distributing policies for the runtime WLS domain. The ASI domain is only for the admin. There should have been a set of resources and policies created as a result of running ConfigTool for your new instance (looks like you named it 'wls'). If no CP, it will be in DefaultApp next to ASI.
    You have to distribute policies for 'wls' immediately following running ConfigTool before starting WebLogic or you will put it into a state where it can't be started. The corrective action is to remove the state.ck file under C:\BEA_HOME_10/ales32-ssm/wls-ssm/instance/wls_ssm/work/runtime, distribute policies, restart WebLogic.
    If you need to re-run ConfigTool (after installing CP for instance), revert the following files:
    <domain>/config/config.xml
    <domain>/bin/startWebLogic.sh | .cmd
    Revert from the no-ales backups created. Remove the instance folder under C:\BEA_HOME_10\ales32-ssm/wls-ssm/instance. You can then re-run ConfigTool if you have to.

  • Acrobat 8 Form - "This Operation Not Permitted" error when enable user rights and open Reader X

    I have a form which is causing me fits.  It was created from an existing PDF form to which I added data fields using LifeCyele Designer.
    When I enable user rights to the document and try to open it in either Adobe Reader X or Acrobat 8 Pro I get the message "This operation is not permitted" twice.  Once I get rid of the messages the form works fine.
    Is there a way to upload the form to this forum for someone to look at it?
    With my limited knowledge, I did try to investigate embeded font issues and hidden object issues.  But after much work I've not gotten much closer to a resolution.
    Best,
    David

    You cannot upload the file to the forum, but you can use Acrobat.com or Dropbox if you have an account. If you ha e no other options I'd be happy to take a look: acroscript at gmail dot com

  • User input in date format in data form is not identified in BR

    Hi all,
    In a data form,user provide input for start month and end month against account members "Transfers Start_Month" and "Transfers End_Month".
    Eg:
    Transfers Start_Month = Jul
    Transfers End_Month =
    Nov
    When i tried to use the above 2 members in BR  as below,
    @MEMBER(@NAME("Transfers End_Month"->"BegBalance"->"SY_Forecast"->"MF04"))
    so that it should return the user input month.Eg:"Nov"
    Above method is not working and its not returning any months.
    I tried using CDF function as below,which also dint return the user input month.
    @MEMBER(@NAME(@HspDateToString("Transfers End_Month"->"BegBalance"->"SY_Forecast"->"MF04")))
    Kindly enlighten on how to handle this scenario.I need the user input month to be returned in BR.
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    Please find the below IF condition where we try to check if the period dim member is between "Jan" to the value entered by user in data form(Eg:"Nov"),then assign 200 to headcount.
    IF(@ISMBR("Jan":@MEMBER(@NAME("Transfers End_Month"->BegBalance->SY_Forecast->MF04))))
    headcount->SY_Forecast->MF04=200;
    ENDIF;
    In above script,@MEMBER(@NAME("Transfers End_Month"->Begbalance->SY_Forecast->MF04)) should return the value entered by user in data form(Eg: "Nov")
    Note: Jan to Dec are level 0 members of period dim
    Kindly enlighten if any additional functions/conversions from date to string i'm missing out.
    Yes,i'm using calc manager to write the rule.
    Thanks!

  • Changed Ulimits values for the Oracle user and getting error -bash: ulimit: max user processes: cannot modify limit: Operation not permitted when logging in.

    I'm trying to increate the ulimits for max user processes and open files for the oracle user.  I've set the values in limits.conf, /etc/profile and in oracle's environment scripts. Now when I log in as oracle I get the below errors. If I change the ulimits back to the original values errors go away but ulimits aren't changed.
    login as: oracle
    [email protected]'s password:
    Last login: Fri Mar  6 09:56:02 2015 from mtkadmin12
    You are logging onto an Oracle system.
    Kickstarted on: 2014-06-05
    -bash: ulimit: max user processes: cannot modify limit: Operation not permitted
    -bash: ulimit: max user processes: cannot modify limit: Operation not permitted
    [oracle@servername ~]$

    Thanks for the update.
    I modified the /etc/security/limits.d/90-nproc.conf and added a line for oracle and also modifed the oracle.sh file.  The ulimits are setting correctly when I su - oracle but they are still wrong when sshing in as oracle.
    [root@mtkdevorap11d-1 ~]# su - oracle
    [oracle@mtkdevorap11d-1 ~]$ ulimit -Ha
    core file size          (blocks, -c) unlimited
    data seg size           (kbytes, -d) unlimited
    scheduling priority             (-e) 0
    file size               (blocks, -f) unlimited
    pending signals                 (-i) 1030982
    max locked memory       (kbytes, -l) 94371840
    max memory size         (kbytes, -m) unlimited
    open files                      (-n) 65536
    pipe size            (512 bytes, -p) 8
    POSIX message queues     (bytes, -q) 819200
    real-time priority              (-r) 0
    stack size              (kbytes, -s) unlimited
    cpu time               (seconds, -t) unlimited
    max user processes              (-u) 16384
    virtual memory          (kbytes, -v) unlimited
    file locks                      (-x) unlimited
    [oracle@mtkdevorap11d-1 ~]$
    [oracle@mtkdevorap11d-2 ~]$ ssh mtkdevorap11d-1
    Last login: Mon Mar 16 13:04:16 2015 from mtkdevorap11d-2.conveydev.com
    You are logging onto an Oracle system.
    Kickstarted on: 2014-06-05
    [oracle@mtkdevorap11d-1 ~]$ ulimit -Ha
    core file size          (blocks, -c) unlimited
    data seg size           (kbytes, -d) unlimited
    scheduling priority             (-e) 0
    file size               (blocks, -f) unlimited
    pending signals                 (-i) 1030982
    max locked memory       (kbytes, -l) 64
    max memory size         (kbytes, -m) unlimited
    open files                      (-n) 4096
    pipe size            (512 bytes, -p) 8
    POSIX message queues     (bytes, -q) 819200
    real-time priority              (-r) 0
    stack size              (kbytes, -s) unlimited
    cpu time               (seconds, -t) unlimited
    max user processes              (-u) 16384
    virtual memory          (kbytes, -v) unlimited
    file locks                      (-x) unlimited
    [oracle@mtkdevorap11d-1 ~]$

  • Creating files in user directory results in "Operation not permitted" error

    Hello everyone,
    I have a FileVault-secured home directory on my PowerBook G4 running OS X 10.4.6 which gives me some headache, as you can see from the following Terminal session:
    arepty-powerbook:~ arepty$ touch fubar
    touch: fubar: Operation not permitted
    I am definitely in the correct directory, logged in as the correct user, have enough free disk space and the directory has the correct permissions, as you can see below:
    arepty-powerbook:~ arepty$ pwd
    /Users/arepty
    arepty-powerbook:~ arepty$ whoami
    arepty
    arepty-powerbook:~ arepty$ id arepty
    uid=501(arepty) gid=501(arepty) groups=501(arepty), 81(appserveradm), 79(appserverusr), 80(admin)
    arepty-powerbook:~ arepty$ df -h | grep '/Users/arepty'
    /dev/disk2s2 74G 64G 11G 86% /Users/arepty
    arepty-powerbook:~ arepty$ ls -l /Users/ | grep arepty
    drwx------ 180 arepty arepty 6222 May 3 12:31 arepty
    Am I missing something here or is my FileVault-directory perhaps fubar? Thanks in advance for any help you guys might be able to give me.
    Cheers,
    Alex
    PowerMac G5 & PowerBook G4   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

    That is good to know, but it will probably make it ever harder to locate the cause of this problem. In the meantime, I made a backup of my FileVault-enabled user directory on my PowerMac and reinstalled the operating system on my PowerBook. During the backup, I have encountered a couple of I/O errors so I'm guessing either the filesystem was damaged (and could not be completely repaired by Disk Utility, which I have tried) or the hard drive is damaged.
    Just to be on the safe side, I have ordered a new hard drive and exchanged it (wouldn't want to risk data loss with the old hard drive) and everything works perfectly again with a completely new user directory.
    I am still wondering what caused all this trouble though, since I want to avoid another incident like this in the future.

  • 713060: Tunnel Rejected: User (user) not member of group (group_name), group-lock check failed.

    Hi,
    I just configure VPN for end users in PIX515e with IOS 8 and get stuck with "Tunnel Rejected: User (msveden) not member of group (VPN-shared), group-lock check failed.". Can someone please help me and tell me how I add user to my VPN group?
    Regards
    Mikael

    May be you are looking for this-
    ASA1(config)# username msveden attributes
    ASA1(config-username)# group-lock value mygroup
    Thanks
    Ajay

Maybe you are looking for