Enforcing additional checks in sequence of activities of e-recruitment

Hi Experts,
Is there any way to make the steps of an activity mandatory? Something like the "Check Suitability" activity needs to be in "Complete" state before I can go ahead with the next activity like "Acknowledge Registered Application" ? As per the standard SAP functionality the recruiter can directly expand any node & perform any activity he desires. The client wants some checks to be enforced so that he is forced to perform the steps only in a particular sequence. Any inputs would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Uday

Dear Uday,
This functionality is not available in the standard E-Recruiting system. You will have to develop your own solution where the system will check in the corresponding activity whether the required activity is created before allowing user top create another activity. If you are in EHP4 there is now standard workflow for for follow up activities (WS51900011). You could maybe change this to automate your activities and create activities in your required sequence - created by workflow and assigned to the person responsible.
Regards,

Similar Messages

Sequence of Activities & Divestiture

Our 4.0 implementation uses the default COI sequence of activities below:
Seq #     Act.     Activity text                   Stop here
1     01     First Consolidation
2     16     Horizontal Merger
3     04     Amortization of Fair Value Adjustments
4     05     Increase in Capitalization
5     06     Reduction in Capitalization
6     07     Step Acquisition
7     08     Partial Transfer
8     09     Total Transfer
9     17     Vertical Merger
10     10     Partial Divestiture                           X
11     11     Total Divestiture
12     12     Liquidation
13     13     Reclassification of Treasury Stock
14     14     Amortization of Investment
15     15     Writeup of Investment
16     02     Subsequent Consolidation
17     03     Amortization of Goodwill
18     18     Distribution of Dividends
When we recorded an end-of-period total divestiture (via AFD), the COI log does the following:
1.     Partial divestiture from 100% to 0% - reversing first consolidation elimination of investment, recording 100% to minority interest balance sheet, and recording gains
2.     Subsequent consolidation because ownership is now considered 100% the entire earnings for the period of divestiture is recorded as minority interest
3.     Total divestiture reversing first consolidation elimination of equity, reversing minority interest balance sheet from partial divestiture above, and gain for earnings of period of divestiture
What bothers me is that subsequent earnings recoded 100% minority interest. Why would this occur when the divestiture is at the end of the period per the master data? Should the activity sequence number for subsequent consolidation change to a number lower that for partial and total divestiture, but remain after the Stop? If so what are the consequences?
The only other alternative I can think of is to leave the activity sequence alone and record the divestiture at the beginning of the next period.
Any help with this is appreciated.

Dan,
Been looking at this myself these last few days. I know conventional wisdom is to not touch the sequence, but I can't see the delivered sequence working correctly (ever) in the case of divestitures if there is activity in the period. As discussed, perhaps this is what makes people chose the DABP option.
In addition to your case with the M/I due to the subsequent consolidation, if you were to issue a dividend in the period of divestiture that dividend income would be reclassed to minority interest as well.
My solution on the dividends to was to bring the activity above the partial transfer step, with the reasoning that in the event of a transfer you would be dividending to the old parent, not the new parent. Testing so far of our likely C/I activites seems to work with the sequence as desired.
For the subsequent consolidation I'm also having issues that we've PL30 topsided around, but I wouldn't want to do that in a transfer because of the income statement adjustments that would be necessary and the statistical account impact. In a future total divestiture activity, the gain/lose would be incorrectly calculated unless I got those statistical balances spot on to agree with the manual PL30.
I suspect the subsequent consolidation should be after the total transfer or vertical merger, with the reasoning that this activity should be performed in the new parent (err...cons group) in this case. Haven't had a chance to test all our likely activities with this scenario, but will probably need a solution real soon.
I'm familiar w/ this note on the topic, wihch is essentially the help.sap.com documentation in a little more technical detail:
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/698955
But I'm not aware of any other documentation on the subject.
Finally....I remember when I took the SEM240 class a while ago they harped on not touching the default sequence, but those of us in the room with a live implementation had all changed from the default sequence.
Anyway...I don't really have a question or helpful info. Just surprised there's nothing more on the topic.
Chris

Check+Printing+Sequence

I am looking for some guidance on Check Printing Sequence. Our specific problem is that we want checks over $50K to print first in our check run because these checks require signatures, but we are unsure of how to get this to work other than having two separate check runs and segregating that way. Can someone suggesta solution? Thanks in advance for your help!

I am receiving threw XML. I don't wana use XSD.

[svn] 2644: First pass at unifying layout APIs between UIComponent and GraphicElement, more to come with additional check-ins.

Revision: 2644
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-07-28 16:58:09 -0700 (Mon, 28 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
First pass at unifying layout APIs between UIComponent and GraphicElement, more to come with additional check-ins.
reviewed by Ryan, Glenn, Gordon, Chet
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/core/Group.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/BitmapGraphic.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/Ellipse.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/FilledElement.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/IGraphicElement.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/Line.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/Path.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/Rect.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/StrokedElement.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/TextBox.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/TextGraphic.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/graphicsClasses/GraphicElement .as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/graphicsClasses/TextGraphicEle ment.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/UIComponent.as

Remember that Arch Arm is a different distribution, but we try to bend the rules and provide limited support for them. This may or may not be unique to Arch Arm, so you might try asking on their forums as well.

COIu0085 Sequence of Activities

There are 3 consolidation task seen for period end:
Data Collection .. Investment Data
Data CollectionSequence of Activities
Task COI execution.
I understand with investment data we load the changes to investment during the month. What is the context in which the sequence of activities has to executed.
What is the real purpose of executing sequence of activities loading along with loading AFD of investment data?

Hi Dan,
Thanks for the inputs.
There is a data stream for ' Sequence of activities'.
How does it gets filled or updated?
I have seen an another project document where the ' sequence of activities' is appearing in the data stream load..

CCUX0000 Additional Check on Configurations: Reading configuration data

Hi,
I have a problem with enhancement CCUX0000 Additional Check on Configurations and function module EXIT_SAPLCUKO_001. I have been struggling with it now a couple of days, and I just don't understand why this enhancement behaves like that.
This enhancement allows you to define your own program for checking a configuration after it has been maintained. The configuration can be checked. If the configuration is inconsistent or incomplete, the exception message INCONSISTENT_CONFIGURATION is triggered. As a result, a popup message "Do You Want to Exit the Incomplete or Inconsistent Configuration?" is displayed.
For some reason, this enhancement is triggered twice.
In the enhancement, I use function module VC_I_GET_CONFIGURATION_IBASE to read the configuration. In the first time, function returns only the original chracteristic, i.e. without the ones entered by the user. In the second time it returns all, i.e. both the original ones and also the characteristic entered by the user.
I have been trying to use other function modules to read the configuration. I have also tried to read the configuration only on the second round, but I cannot use this since in the second run the ecxeption message INCONSISTENT_CONFIGURATION is not working at all. Furthermore, I have been trying to use other user exits.
How can I read the configuration? Is this a bug in SAP standard?
Thanks in advance for your help,
Jarmo

HI Jarmo,
Use the following function module
CUXI_GET_SINGLE_CONFIGURATION or CUXI_GET_MULTI_CONFIGURATION
depending on your setup
Example.
SELECT SINGLE cuobj INTO l_root_instance FROM vbap
          WHERE vbeln = p_vbeln
          AND   uepos = space.
CALL FUNCTION 'CUXI_GET_SINGLE_CONFIGURATION'
    EXPORTING
      i_root_instance              = l_root_instance
    TABLES
      e_tab_instances              = it_instances_tab
      e_tab_part_of                = it_part_of_tab
      e_tab_values                 = it_values_tab
      e_tab_var_keys               = it_var_keys_tab
    EXCEPTIONS
      invalid_instance             = 1
      no_root_instance             = 2
      instance_is_a_classification = 3
      internal_error               = 4
      no_profile_found             = 5
      invalid_data                 = 6
      OTHERS                       = 7.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
        WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
Reward if heplful *****

Migration of Sequence of Activities ODS - mapping & aggregation by periods?

Sequence of Activities ODS Migration via text upload/ODS Copy
As part of our data migation, we are considering migrating the ODSs (as per SEM-245 document info and also on help.sap.com)
Fields of some concern to me for this ODS;
0BCS_COIFU Execute Previous Activities - this is blank source system, so I do not need to worry in migration, any concerns?
0CS_COIAC C/I Activity - this is the same in source and target, but I'm concerned about losing initial activities due to having a different starting date (see TIME fields below)
0BCS_SEQNU Sequence Number - this appears to be a sequential number (but there is not a starting point of 0001 in the source system), can I map this as is, or should I re-number from 0001?
0CS_COINR Activity Number - this is just a number range, so I need to ensure that either the target system includes the numbers or I convert to suitable number range for the target - any pitfalls here?
INVESTEE UNIT
Z_xxx Investee Unit
For Investee unit we will be mapping from many to one and some divested units will not be relevant in our migration periods, what problems would occurr if I excluded redundnat records that do not exist in the new system?
- eg if we cut out the ODS records for unit divested in 2006, will the sequence numbers etc, above, be out of synch?
- conversely, if we migrate all of the ODS records but the divested units do not exist in the target system, what will we face?
TIME fields
0FISCPER3 Posting Period
0FISCYEAR Fiscal Year
We are aggregating data for our initial periods (eg source system starts in 2006 but target system starts in 2009), can we aggregate postings to the next period in the target system?
(eg Activity is 1 first consolidation in p12, 2006 and 2 subsequent consolidation in p6, 2007 but we aggregate this into the target ODS as Activity 1 = p12, 2009 and Activity 2 = p12, 2009)
I hope this question isn't too large, no need to answer everything, please let me have any feedback on any of the fields.
Thanks,

0BCS_COIFU - I agree that there is probably nothing to worry about for this
0CS_COIAC - have to think a bit on this one, no suggestions at this time
0BCS_SEQNU -not quite sure, but I would map as-is
0CS_COINR - I agree with your assessment and do not see any pitfalls
Excluding redundant Investee unit records is necessary isn't it? I am not certain, but do not think the activity numbers necessarily have to be in synch or chronological. It might be worth askling SAP though. For the alternative of migrating all of the ODS records but the divested units do not exist in the target system, couldn't you create the master data for these and simply exclude them from the hierarchy?

Sequence of activities during Cutover and Go-live

Hi SDN team
Can you please help me on list of activities in sequence to be done during Cutover and during Go-live?
I would be grateful, if you can provide me the details at the earliest.
have a great day
Regards,
Sasi

Hi,
the general activities..
1. Cutover meeting with the steering Committe
2. Ask the client to stop his activity for cutover period.
3.Transporting the requests one by one...to prod
4.Analysis of the Configu
5.uploading the Master data
6.uploading transactional data
7.Analizing the request status..
8.Checking various Tcodes without Saving..
apartment from the above there will be various documentation activities...etc....
Thx
Raju

Is there a way to enforce the use of sequences

is there a way to stop someone from inserting an id without using the sequence?
CREATE SEQUENCE id_seq
   START WITH 1;
CREATE TABLE test_table (id_seq NUMBER (4) PRIMARY KEY);
INSERT INTO test_table
     VALUES (id_seq.NEXTVAL);
INSERT INTO test_table
     VALUES (2);
INSERT INTO test_table
     VALUES (id_seq.NEXTVAL);gives us
ORA-00001: unique constraint (DSAMSTRC.SYS_C0091648) violated
as it should
however is there a check constraint of some ilk that ensures that the user is using the sequence when doing inserts?
so that the second insert
INSERT INTO test_table
     VALUES (2);gives me some sort of check constraint violation that I'm not using the id_seq.NEXTVAL ?

Justin:
One minor problem with your trigger. If the "bad" insert is the first thing done in the session you get:
SQL> insert into test_table values(25);
insert into test_table values(25)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-08002: sequence ID_SEQ.CURRVAL is not yet defined in this session
ORA-06512: at "OPS$ORACLE.TRG_TEST_TABLE", line 4
ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger 'OPS$ORACLE.TRG_TEST_TABLE'If you want to raise an exception instead of just silently using the sequence as Frank suggests you need something more like:
create trigger trg_test_table
   before insert on test_table
   for each row
declare
   l_currval integer;
   no_currval exception;
   PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT (no_currval, -8002);
begin
   select id_seq.currval
   into l_currval
   from dual;
   if( l_currval != :new.id_seq ) then
      raise_application_error( -20001, 'Hey! Use the sequence' );
   end if;
exception
   when no_currval then
      raise_application_error( -20001, 'Hey! Use the sequence' );
end;John

How to set value from LOV only as a default reference not enforce validate check?

In jdev 11.1.2.3,
By creating List of Value(LOV) for an attribute of a VO, I can get default value for the current VO's attribute from the lookup table, but it will also enforce a validate check for that value.
If I input a value which is not in the lookup table, then errors will raised.
Now I hope I can get default value from LOV, and can also input some new value (and this new value can be insert into the lookup table by a database trigger) for the attribute/field without failure to pass the check.
Any one can help?
Thanks!

Hi, Arun
Your suggestion let me get to know how to create a new record in the customeActions facet of inputComboBoxListOfValues, which I donot know before. It's great. and thank you very much.
However, my current issue is a different requirement, let me describe it clearly as:
I have a formlayout to input a field value which can be from a lookup table, or if this value is not in the lookup table then it can also be input without raising value validation check failure.and this new value can be added to the lookup table at the same time.
for example, there is a FK attribute deptno in the EMP table, in a form for editing EMP attributes, user can input deptno value which is already in the DEPT lookup table by selecting from a LOV. also can input some new value which cannot be selected from the LOV, and this new deptno value will be posted to database both in EMP and DEPT table.
The issue is, after create a LOV for deptno attribute in EMP VO, there will be a enforced value validation check, so new values cannot be input in EMP unless it is input into DEPT first.
(http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E37975_01/web.111240/e16182/lists.htm#BABBJFBB)
List of values are designed to return valid values only. As a result, validation rules defined on data source view object attributes will be suppressed.
My question is: how to disable this enforced value validation for a LOV-enabled field?
(There is other means to ensure user will input valid value for this field, for example ask him to double input.)
Thanks again!
bao

Check in sequence

Hi
I have 3 elements. I want to make sure this element in
sequence and exists. how can i check its in sequence.
Firstname
Middlename
LastName
Thanks

I am receiving threw XML. I don't wana use XSD.

Additional checking for rebate condition fulfilment during settlement

Hi Gurus,
This is a typical requirement from my client-
Client encourgaes sales to a particular part of the country. All our dealers belonging to any city or location are encouraged to sell to their end-customers of that part of the country. Dealers do specify the final customer location in their purchase orders, that we are capturing in the sales office field during sales order creation. Now, capturing the sales office as a criteria we are offering rebates and the system works fine.
However, sometimes dealers falsely declare the special rebate location in their PO but off load the material somewhere else. To check this part, our client have deputed people to confirm the material physically reaches the location that specified at the sales order; and on confirmation from these people only the rebate amount is paid to the dealers. Can some one suggest the way to map this, any idea will be highly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Ajit

Hi,
I am just bouncing an idea as :
I suggest you to put in place the functionality of Proof of Deliver . Proof of delivery (POD) is an instrument involved in business processes in which an invoice is issued only after the customer has confirmed the delivery's arrival and your rebate will be displayed as in normal process in invoice . In addition to the proof of delivery itself, you can also record the POD date, POD time, the actual quantity that arrived and the reason for possible differences in quantities.By this you will keep the track on delivery receipts.
In possible reason you can configure the reason code as "different location" for POD.
Then develop the requirement routine(VOFM) which will be the clone of 24. In this put an additional requirement to check pod and if reason code is different location.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Atul

Check number sequence - previous record variable

Post Author: rmhogan
CA Forum: Formula
I am trying to highlight a record that is out of number sequence with the previous record. I am guessing that I need to create 2 variables (one for the current number and one for the previous number). I cannot seem to get this to work.
Any help would be appriciated.
Example ....
Check Number
016000123
016000124
016000126 <--- out of sequence (I want to highlight this detail line)
016000127

Post Author: rmhogan
CA Forum: Formula
Thanks so much. However, I am getting a error saying ... "The formula result must be a number". The fields are strings in the database, however I have converted the to numbers in a formula [tonumber() function].
Any ideas.

Regular expression to check the sequence of strings

HI,
I am validating an EDI document like as follows
ISA*XX*XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX*XX*XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX*030130*0912*~IEA*1*000005900~
I need to create a regular expression which checks ISA should always occur before IEA.
Please help me if you have any hints.
Thanks.

Thanks.I had taken that into consideration.
But using regular expression I could say
ISA* only once
IEA* only once
And
ISA before IEA
Any hints how to specify "before"/sequence using Regular expression ?
I agree sometime using basic String operation we can do this.

How Do check the sequence on a merge patch?

Hi hussein,
If I merged 34 patches, how do I know which sequence in order did the ADmrgpch take?
Is there a file in the merger that I can check in which order does merger applying the 34 patches?
Thanks a lot

>
i just thought merging is a "heplful" idea :(Hi,
Merging is a helpful idea, but unfortunately not for the purpose you describe. :) If you really need to know which patch has failed, then you will have to apply each one individually. Merging doesn't set up a system to apply individual patches in sequence. It creates a completely new patch driver from the contents of all the other patches, and applies all of the files as single patch. Since you apply a merged patch in a single adpatch session, you won't be able to stop the session in the middle and have a stable system.
Regards,
John P.
http://only4left.jpiwowar.com

Enforcing additional checks in sequence of activities of e-recruitment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for