Enhanced Receiver determination - for Integration Process

Hi,
Just wanted to confirm that if it is possible to have more than one Receivers, with Enhanced Receiver Determination and one of the Receiver happens to be Integration Process. I know with Enhanced Receiver Determinations you can find more than one Receivers at Run time, however the key question is, if in addition to normal Receiver Systems (like SAP R/3 or Web Services etc), if we can also kickoff Integration Process within Enhanced Receiver Determination.
Thanking in advance.

as said by Udo Martens
Assumedly the different receivers are using different Inbound Interfaces (a BP is using an Abstract Interface). Therefore you would need for each different receiver a own Interface Determination referring a own mapping.
refer this wiki  http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/pointstab/viewpageversion.action?pageId=131760630&version=5 to Know how to  configure Enhanced receiver determination  and Interface determination for each receiver .
In your case one of the receiver will be Integration process

Similar Messages

  • Receiver Determination for Integration Process - R/3

    Hi,
    While creating the receiver determination for the BAPI, how to specify the BAPI name in the Receiver (Partner) Service .
    I found an example in SDN Blog, however, it did not clear my doubt.
    /people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
    Kindly, reply me.
    Regards,
    dinesh.

    >
    Dinesh Kumar wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > While creating the receiver determination for the BAPI, how to specify the BAPI name in the Receiver (Partner) Service .
    >
    > I found an example in SDN Blog, however, it did not clear my doubt.
    >
    > /people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit
    >
    > Kindly, reply me.
    >
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > dinesh.
    did you import the BAPI?
    Your receiver system will be the SAP BS. when you use the f4 help option for the interface it will list the BAPI and u can select it

  • Enhanced Receiver Determination for synchronous interface.

    Hello!
    Was anyone faced with the Enhanced Receiver Determination? When I try to create
    the definition of the Interface Mapping, I get the error:
    "Interface modi are different. Source interface Message Interface MI_My_sync_iface | urn:my is synchronous. Target interface Message Interface ReceiverDetermination | http://sap.com/xi/XI/System is asynchronous"
    Thank you.

    Hi ,
    U can go through below limks  :
    Illustration of Enhanced Receiver Determination - SP16
    SAP NetWeaver Process Integration: Enhanced Receiver Determination for Synchronous Scenarios
    Enhanced Receiver Determination in SAP XI - Exchange Infrastructure - Wiki
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/enhanced%2breceiver%2bdetermination%2bin%2bsap%2bxi
    Thanks

  • Receiver Agreement for Integration Process

    Dear All
    I am facing a strange problem when I am sending a message via proxy to SAP PI whci is  then supposed to forward it to a legacy system.
    I am using a BPM and am getting an error like no receiver agreement found between the sender SAPECC system and receiver integration process

    Hi,
    >>>a BPM and am getting an error like no receiver agreement found between the sender SAPECC system and receiver integration process
    use the integration directory wizard and create two configurations
    - ECC - PI (integration process)
    - PI (BPM) - to the legacy
    then it will work - this is not an error but lack of configuration
    Regards,
    Michal Krawczyk

  • Enhanced Receiver Determination in PI7.1

    Hi,
    We have a requirement where in we have to use the Enhanced Receiver Determination for one of our scenarios for choosing the receiver.We are on PI7.1.
    As of now,we have mapped a constant rcvr(Test_Supplier) to the Service in the message mapping from our source to the target -Receivers, as we do for Enhanced Receiver determination.The rcvr determination choosing Extended and the correct Operation mapping has been configured.The coresponding Interface determination and Receiver agreements have also been configured.
    When trying to test this by posting a payload through RWB,we get the No_Receiver_Case_Async error.
    Is it necessary to map the party field also in the message mapping?Am I missing something here?Kindly advise.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Induja

    When trying to test this by posting a payload through RWB,we get the No_Receiver_Case_Async error.
    Is the Mapping which you developed to determine the receiver(s) able to give the appropriate output? Apart from cache problem, this can also be the issue when the mapping does not produce i.e. no proper service is populated in the corresponding node....the service must be actually present (and active) in ID
    Regards,
    Abhishek

  • Enhanced Receiver Determination in Synchronous Scenario

    Hi,
    my synch scenario with standard Receiver determination is working fine.
    the service interfaces i used are SI_OutSynch_EmpInfo_Request and SI_InbSynch_EmpInfo_Provide.
    I am now trying to apply enhanced Receiver determination for the same synch scenario.
    For this, in ID, in my Receiver Determination object i selected the radio button Extended, then it is asking for an operation mapping. infact it is asking for an OM with sender Interface=SI_OutSynch_EmpInfo_Request (from my swcv) and Receiver Interface = ReceiverDetermination (from SAP BASIS swcv)..
    So I logged into ESR, and created an OM_test_EnhancedRD, with sourceInterface=SI_OutSynch_EmpInfo_Request (from my swcv) and TargetInterface = ReceiverDetermination (from SAP BASIS swcv)
    But when i tried to activate the OM_test_EnhancedRD, it is not getting activated, and giving below error:
    Interface modi are different. Source interface Operation SI_OutSynch_EmpInfo_Request | http://mycomp.com/myns is synchronous. Target interface Operation ReceiverDetermination | http://sap.com/xi/XI/System is asynchronous
    So my queries are:
    1. is for synch scenarios, if receiver information is part of the request payload, how can we apply the extended Receiver Determination, so that the Receiver is determined dynamically.
    2. or is there any synch version of ReceiverDetermination (from SAP BASIS swcv) available.
    thanks in advance.
    madhu.

    in this case, does SAP provide synch version of ReceiverDetermination SI, so that we can use that in OM for enhanced Receiver Determination.
    If you have a look at the blog-reference given by Ravi you will find a way on how to make the ReceiverDetermination Si synchronous or work with the same async SI.....for quick reference below is the way mentioned in the blog:
    From the blog:
    Option 1:
    A quick and easy way to allow for synchronous enhanced receiver determination setup is to circumvent the check that prevents
    a synchronous interface to be matched to an asynchronous interface in an interface mapping. This can be done simply by
    manually entering the name and namespace of the ReceiverDetermination interface object (e.g. 'ReceiverDetermination'
    and 'http://sap.com/xi/XI/System' respectively) for the target/receiver interface in the interface mapping, but leaving the value for
    the Software Component Version empty.
    Option 2:
    Select Modify and then change the mode to synchronous. Since a synchronous interface requires an input message as well, you
    can reuse the Receivers message type used in the output message - it doesn't really matter as long as some message type is
    used.
    Both of the above options are available under the Applying the Workarounds section of the blog
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Interface Mapping for enhanced Receiver Determ. in Integration Scenario

    Hi guys,
    Defining Integration scenario is a pleasant way working with XI.
    But how to define the step "enhanced receiver determination" via message mapping in a scenario?
    has anybody come along to this issue?
    Kind regards
    Jochen

    hi,
       You use an enhanced receiver determination to have a mapping program determine the receivers of the message dynamically at runtime. Instead of creating the receivers in the receiver determination manually, you assign a mapping to the receiver determination and this returns a list of receivers at runtime.
    A typical usage case is if you do not yet know the names of the receivers at configuration time. In this case, you can define a mapping program, for example, which reads a list of receivers from a table or from the payload of the message at runtime.
    http://www.****************/Tutorials/XI/RecvDetermination/Enhancement.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm
    Edited by: murali krishna on Sep 1, 2008 5:49 PM
    Edited by: murali krishna on Sep 1, 2008 6:03 PM

  • Enhanced receiver determination

    why we assign the abstract message interface ReceiverDetermination as the target interface.can we achieve enhanced receiver determination without this abstract interface.I have gone through sap help and some blocks of sdn also but still its not clear to me that whats the role of this abstract interface.

    Hi
    For receiver determination::- See
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/26/5ccd3bb4560f01e10000000a11402f/content.htm
    About
    Abstract Interface :
    The abstract interface work both inbound and outbound interface(Bi directional).
    BPM can process messages only through "abstract interfaces" al though Receive and Send steps can have interfaces other then "abstract interfaces"  all other intermediat steps of BPM needs "abstract interfaces"
    Hope it helps
    regards
    Piyush

  • Intermittent JDBC error in Enhanced Receiver Determination

    Hi,
    I have an interface that use Enhanced Receiver Determination in PI 7.1 EHP1.
    The database is DB2 on i5/os 6.1
    Sometimes message ends in error :Error when determining the receiver: Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: Runtime exception occurred during application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_HI01_to_ReceiverDetermination_;
    But the same message with same values is successfull earlier.
    This is not a design problem; the interface is working well 95% of the time.
    I found some JDBC error in NWA java logs:
    Error in sax handler parsing request: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'table' (structure 'statement'): java.sql.SQLException: [SQL0104] Token "BUSINESS_SYSTEM" was not valid. Valid tokens: FOR SKIP WITH FETCH ORDER UNION EXCEPT OPTIMIZE.
    Error when calling an adapter by using the communication channel CC_RECEIVER_JDBC_PIDB2 (Party: *, Service: INTEGRATION_SERVER_PX1, Object ID: cb7ea38fb2ac3a06b12d79f5ade2bcf7) XI AF API call failed. Module exception: (No information available). Cause Exception: 'Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'table' (structure 'statement'): java.sql.SQLException: [SQL0104] Token "BUSINESS_SYSTEM" was not valid. Valid tokens: FOR SKIP WITH FETCH ORDER UNION EXCEPT OPTIMIZE.'.
    Thrown:
    com.sap.aii.af.service.api.AFException: XI AF API call failed. Module exception: (No information available). Cause Exception: 'Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'table' (structure 'statement'): java.sql.SQLException: [SQL0104] Token "BUSINESS_SYSTEM" was not valid. Valid tokens: FOR SKIP WITH FETCH ORDER UNION EXCEPT OPTIMIZE.'.
    at com.sap.aii.af.service.api.AdapterAccess.sendMsg(AdapterAccess.java:214)
    at com.sap.aii.af.service.api.AdapterAccess.execute(AdapterAccess.java:283)
    at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.lookup.AdapterProxyLocal.execute(AdapterProxyLocal.java:119)
    at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.lookup.SystemAccessorInternal.execute(SystemAccessorInternal.java:76)
    at com.sap.aii.mapping.lookup.DataBaseAccessor.execute(DataBaseAccessor.java:74)
    at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib7.SelectSingle.selectSingle(SelectSingle.java:54)
    at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor607.invoke(Unknown Source)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:592)
    Any idea? Can high volume cause the JDBC Receiver to fail?
    Martin

    hi,
    you r trying to impliment Lookup for the file adapter which is not synch in nature and hance u r not getting the responce back.
    please find the link which deals with how to impliment lookup for file adapter.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/xi/file%252blookup%252bin%252budf.
    now once u get rhe runtime receiver u can perform enhanced receiver determination (write a simple UDF)
    regards,
    navneet.

  • Enhanced Receiver Determination with RFC Lookup

    Hi All,
    I am building an interface with Enhanced Receiver Determination. Scenario would be that the Receiver Systems would be stored in a Z table in SAP ECC, and in PI Receiver Determination I am doing an RFC look up to find the systems, and using those.
    I built the mapping for Receiver Determination, and it tested fine in ESR. But while Creating the Receiver Determination in Integration Directory, After I specify the Receiver mapping name, and put the RFC channel name for the RFC parameter, it doesnt allow me to save the Receiver Agreement with a run time error message
    "Link from Receiver Determination  | <Sender>| <Interface>| * | * to object type "Channel" with role "122474913b1311deaadb42057dd8b002" is not permitted"
    My question is a) if the RFC lookup allowed in the mapping for Receiver Determination?
    B) if yes, am I missing someting or is it a system issue?

    i have seen Enhanced RD with lookups that work. Have to say it was not a RFC lookup used but rather a DB look in one of the implementations i had worked with. But still I really dont think a RFC lookup should be an issue.
    Troubleshoot the lookup mapping to be working other than in the enhanced RD (i.e independently) .
    if you head no where, i suggest opening a OSS note.

  • Enhanced Receiver Determination synchronous

    Hi all,
    I am running into a bit of a problem when using enhanced receiver determination on a SOAP - XI - RFC scenario on a NW2004 SP17 XI system.
    According to the help.sap.com (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm) I have to make an interface mapping to the "ReceiverDetermination" async abstract interface.
    Here is my problem: "ReceiverDetermination" is asynchronous and my source (SOAP) interface is synchronous, but it seems impossible to define a interface mapping between a synchronous and asynchronous interface.
    Do any of you have any ideas and/or suggestions to solve my current predicament?
    Steven

    Hi,
    After some experimentation I found a solution.
    It involves building a sync/sync bridge in an Integration Process and using a Receiver Determination step in that Integration Process.
    The Integration Process forces you to store the request/response messages in an abstract ASYNC interface. When the Receiver Determination step calls the Receiver Determination Object in the directory, it uses the abstract async interface of the request message, instead of normal sync interface.
    This enables you to build an enhanced receiver determination interface mapping using the abstract async interface used to store the message in the integration process.
    Steven

  • Enhanced Receiver Determination - Hard-coded Receivers??

    Hi mates,
    I need to implment enhanced receiver determination. I see from the documentation and blogs that I need to hard-code the receiver service i.e. specifying the value in message mapping.
    What happens if I transport this mapping program to QA or PROD system? Do I need to take care of the Receiver system names in QA & PROD in the mapping.
    Isnt it hard-coding?
    Is there any better way of doing this, apart from using the BPM.
    I appreciate your inputs.
    thx in adv
    praveen

    Hi,
    If you are using enhanced receiver determination, you are going to provide Receiver Details in the Integration Directory right ? If so, anyway while doing Transport from the Dev to QA, you are creating a Transport Target for the business systems.. So here in the configuration it will take care ...
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/ef/a21e3e0987760be10000000a114084/content.htm
    But, I am not sure where are you refering about  Hard-Coding ?
    Rgds,
    moorthy

  • Problem with Enhanced Receiver Determination

    Hi Friends,
    I am doing the enhanced receiver determination scenario,  But it is giving the
    error in SXMB_MONI like this
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Receiver Identification
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">CX_RD_PLSRV</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: Fehler beim Parsen der Empfänger-Liste.Länge des XML-Dokuments 264</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Error when determining the receiver: Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: Fehler beim Parsen der Empfänger-Liste.Länge des XML-Dokuments 264 Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: Fehler beim Parsen der Empfänger-Liste.Länge des XML-Dokuments 264 Fehler beim Parsen der Empfänger-Liste.Länge des XML-Dokuments 264 System expected the element 'Receivers'</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    this is error is coming in the SXMB_MONI
    THE DATA type(Receivers) we create in basis component is comes automatically?
    are we have to create?
    in my scenario i creted manually,
    is it compulsory to specify the properties for the party and agency?
    is it compulsory to create 2 Receiver structures in msg structure?
    if yes what r those, actually i used from sap.help.com,
    Can any body should give me the solution for this, regarding mapping and configuration , if anybody experienced this scenario. Pls . give me  the guidelines to do.

    Hi,
    the mapping creating the receiver list is not producing the required element "Receivers" from Namespace "'http://sap.com/xi/XI/System". Look to the operation mapping given in the enhance Receiver Determination (IB Directory)  and detect the corresponding mapping program (ESR).  Copy the source payload from MONI, test the mapping program and correct it.
    Regards,
    Udo

  • PI 7.1 - Parameter in enhanced receiver determination

    Hello experts,
    I am working on PI 7.1.
    I defined a scenario where I am using an enhanced Receiver determination to determine the list of target services thanks to an operation mapping and its related message mapping. I'd like to pass a constant value from this receiver determination to use it in the message mapping.
    To do so, I set an import parameter in the operation mapping and the message mapping and made the needed binding.
    I can then see this parameter in the receiver determination, but I can not put a constant value in it and then activate my configuration..
    Do you know why ?

    Hi
    I have not used this feature yet, however I dont think that this is a bug.
    the Parameterized mapping feature is for ID->OM->MM & not for RD.
    more info
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/43/bbb7fd90f5332ee10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2008/02/14/sap-pi-71-mapping-enhancements-series-parameterized-message-mappings
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/909e33f0-738c-2a10-4f87-ce73398bcf08
    Regards
    Vishnu

  • Can I Using Enhance Receiver Determination?

    Hi,
    Can I used Enhanced Receiver Determination to push data to Receiver 2 , based on the response coming from Receiver 1 ( a BPM that that has a synchronous send step and fetches response from SAP through a proxy) ? If yes, how ?
    thanks & regards,
    XA

    We can have just a send step and for that send step we can configure a condition based receiver Determination right?
    yeah correct
    > and Can you throw some light on how to deal with queues, in case if the response doesnt come from SAP to PI due to some reason, which can happen in real time?
    it will thhrow time out exception or message expired exception, if you want to do exception handling do it accrodingly using Control step.
    Regards,
    Raj

Maybe you are looking for

  • My dv6-6c29wm won't start up. it doesn't have any lights or fan.

    it feels like it doesn't have any power at all. the little led light on the side of power port would blink once when i connect to power and blink once when i pull it. is there a problem with the motherboard? 

  • Time Period Syntax

    Hello, I am trying to get a report for a list of documents within a time period. I want the start date as optional, in the sense, if the input criteria is not filled, it should give right from the beginning. Same with end date, if the input criteria

  • Multiple Business Partner Selection on Activities trhough higher level

    Dear all, During a Business Transaction creation (e.g. activity), we need to find a way to, when checking a higher level of business partners (e.g. organizational unit, position), all the business partners associated to that level will be automatical

  • Suggest if I can use FM 'SAP_CONVERT_TO_TEX_FORMAT'

    Hi, I have a requirement where I need to download the data in the internal table say it_tab into UNIX/PC as .CSV file. For PC first I used FM 'SAP_CONVERT_TO_TEX_FORMAT' which converted the data in it_tab into another table say it_trux. Then I used i

  • Regarding business blue print

    Hi i am working as a SAP SD consultant .the nature of business of my client is service industry.if any one can have sample sap sd business blue print u can send me the document. pls help me in the issue,its career related issue Thanks & Regards Rames