Enhancement for CS12 and CS13

HI All,
I want to add some more fields to the ALV grid output of the transaction CS12 and CS13,
Can anybody please tell the steps how to proceed.
Thanks.

Dear Manik,
Please try out the following enhancements:
(1) C1L30002 - EHS: BOMBOS - Creating Additional Substance Data
(2) C1L30003 - EHS: BOMBOS - Creating Secondary Data
Regards,
Abir
Don't forget to award Points *

Similar Messages

How to fix enhancements for speakers and headphones IDT high definition audio CODEC

I received a Windows message indicating "Windows has detected enhancements for the following are causing problems. Speakers & Headphones IDT High Definition Audeo CODEC.
How can I correct this?
fasteddie0717

Did you install a third party CODEC?
****Please click on Accept As Solution if a suggestion solves your problem. That will help another person facing the same problem to find a solution easily****
2015 Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience Consumer

Cs11, cs12 and cs13

Hi, obsered that in cs13, certain raw materials are not appearing where as in cs11 all bom comonents were appeared. pls advise what is the difference between cs11, 12 and 13?

Hi,
Those are the BOM explosion methods for reporting purpose.
level By level explosion, and summarized BOM.
When you say not all the material are appearing in CS13, check the the quantity of the common materials across the levels.
You will get ur answer.
check these links
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/en/a0/1016bd4c8311d189520000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/en/a0/1016bd4c8311d189520000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/en/a0/1016bd4c8311d189520000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards
Raghu

Enhancement for QA02 and QA01.

Hi experts,
I have req like In QA02 i ahv eto validate for the field PSTER..(Planned startdate in the tab Immediate tasks) it should not be gretaer than LTRMN( Request end date in the Notification details)..if yes..then i have to raise error message..but current program showing information message l..(THis is std program)
Include is LIQS0I10---> LIne no 1248...
IF NOT VIQMSM-PETER IS INITIAL.
    IF NOT VIQMEL-LTRMN IS INITIAL.
      IF VIQMSM-PETER GT VIQMEL-LTRMN.
*--- Maßnahmenende hinter Meldungsende
        MESSAGE I507.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
How to cahge thsi mesage as error mesg? can any body plzz help me...
Moderator message: please use the spell checker, do not use SMS speak.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Jan 5, 2011 12:37 PM

Hi Veena,
Below are the user exits for Tcode QA01.
Exit Name           Description
QAAT0001            Inspection type determination different from variant 01
QAAT0002            Control of acceptance lots/goods receipt
QLCO0002            QM: Recording of appraisal costs: Presetting of conf. data
QPL10001            QM: Inspection lot creation - editing work area on creation
QPL10003            Sample calculation for inspection lot without plan
QPL10004            User subscreen for displaying additional data in insp. lot
QPL10007            QM: Inspection lot creation - change QM order type
I am assuming that it is
Enhancement : QPL10001
FM : EXIT_SAPLQPL1_002
FIeld : I_QALS-PASTRTERM
Regards,
Jovito

Enhancement for Installation and Move-In

Hi experts
i want to add field at installation and move-in screen .
How i can do this , i think no BDT available for these.
Pls Reply ASAP.
Thanx

Hi,
For Installation ,you have the following exits
Exit Name           Description
ECIIFLOT            IS-U: cust. include for conn. obj. and device loc. CI_IFLOT
ECONNOBJ        IS-U: duplicate check for connection object
ECSMA001         Loyalty Account: Subscreen Integration and Field Checks
ECSMA002         IS-U: Redemption: Subscreen Integration and Field Checks
EMDI0001           IS-U: Installation - subscreen integration and field check
EMDK0001          IS-U: contract - subscreen integration and field check
EMDP0001          IS-U: premise - subscreen integration and field check
ES550001            IS-U: connection obj. - subscreen integr. and field check
ES650001            IS-U: device loc. - subscreen integration and field check
For move in
Exit Name           Description
EC500001            IS-U: move-in: determ. of security deposit amount and reason
EC500002            IS-U: move-in: data environment check upon entry
ECSBT001            User-Defined Messages in Information Log
ECSBTI01            IS-U: move-in: determination of application form
ECSBTI02            IS-U: move-in: determination of budget billing amount
ECSBTI03            IS-U move-in: customer-defined checks
ECSBTI04            IS-U: move-in: determination of transfer contract
ECSBTIO1            Default value for field for move-in/out (EC60)
ECSBTMR1            Preassign indicator for creating service notification/order
ECSBTO01            IS-U: move-out: determine default values
ECSBTO02            IS-U Move-Out: User-Defined Checks
Edited by: SivaKumar on Jun 16, 2009 12:28 PM

Enhancement for ME21N and ME22N

Hi Expert,
I need to change the delivery priority in STO, according to the data entered in the header(EKKO). But i am not able to find an exit or BAdi which is having the parameter delivery priority. The table and field names: ( EKPV LPRIO).
In case anybody working similar requirements please let me know.
Thanks and Regards
Joby Jacob

in method Post you can do this stuff like that
DATA: ls_mepo TYPE mepoitem,
        ls_items TYPE purchase_order_item,
        lt_items TYPE purchase_order_items.
lt_items = go_header->get_items( ).
LOOP AT lt_items INTO ls_items.
    ls_mepo = ls_items-item->get_shipping_data( ).
then set_shipping_data...
ENDLOOP.

Java language enhancement for method and field

similar to the way FooClass.class works in the language, i would like to see the following code constructs also supported by the java language:
[FooClass.]someMethod.method
[FooClass.]someField.field
i thought i had read that something like this was coming in se 7, but i can't seem to find the "what's new in se 7" page. can anyone direct me to it?
shackman01

I haven't read anything about that, at all. but I hope it comes to be

Enhancement for QM01 and Qm02

Hi experts,
I have req like validation on planned finish date ...when i press enter it should validate with Request end date..
is there any exit which will trigger when i press enter on Planned start date..
Can any body plz tell me?
Moderator message: please do your own research before asking.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Jan 5, 2011 1:51 PM

QM_NOTIF_OVERVW1

Question about "Enhanced for loop"

public class NewLoopTest{
     public NewLoopTest(){
          int result=0;
          int[] a=new int[20];
          for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++){
               a=i++;
          for(int i:a){
System.out.println("i="+i+";"+"a["+i+"]="+a[i]+";result="+result+"+"+i+"="+(result+i));
               result+=i;
          System.out.println("-------------");
          result=0;
          for(int i=0;i<a.length;i++){
               System.out.println("i="+i+";"+"a["+i+"]="+a[i]+";result="+result+"+"+i+"="+(result+i));
               result+=i;
This code counts sum of the elements of a array.
At first I use the enhanced for loop and at second I use the traditional for.
Enhanced for loop in sdk1.5 returns only even elements of array, am I right?

Enhanced for loop in sdk1.5 returns only even
elements of array, am I right?No. It covers them all.
The i in the enhanced for loop is not the index. It's the element at the current index. You don't have access to the index in the new loop because you don't need it.
for (int item : arr) {
    System.out.println(item);
// is equivalent to
for (int ix = 0; ix < arr.length; ix++) {
    int item = aa[ix];
    System.out.println(item);
}The i in your new loop is the same as a [ i ] in the old loop.

Implicit enhancement for report painter reports(For GRR3 and CJE3)

Hi,
We have a client requirement to add 5 fields (In selection screen) to report painter reports ( Reports of CJE3 and GRR3 ).We created Z reports as a copy of standard reports, added required 5 fields by implementing SAP notes and other settings.We have also done implicit enhancement for all these reports to make change in the behaviour of new fields.This is working fine in the development client but the problem is once we transport this to other client new reports get generated( With new name ) and implicit enhancement will be lost.
For eg:in development client for CJE1/CJE2 report the program name will be "GPAVPSATWFP4NN0YRDBIQBHI8MQ"
but when we transport it to other client new program "GP8O1UCNZTJYY5LTO8GN0UW2GQB" is generated in which implicit enhancements are not found.
Can you please suggest how to handle implicit enhancement in such cases? Or what is the correct way to transport it.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Shekhar

Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply..
I have already done implicit enhancement as you said ,my problem is to transport it to another client.
I have implemented implicit enhancement for one report lets say it as "ABC", and i transport it to another client with all the enhancement. But in another client new program "XYZ" is getting generated for same report( dynamic programs ), so my implicit enhancement is present but its applicable to "ABC" program but not for "XYZ".
Can you please suggest how can i handle this??
thanks in advance,
Greeshma.
Edited by: Accgreeshma on Jan 23, 2012 3:04 PM

F-48- Downpayement related to downpayment request and enhancements for PO

Hi to all,
Is there anyone that can explain me why in F-48 transaction, when I make a downpayment related to downpayment request, in the subsequent screen the fields are filled with the value retrieve from previous screen ( in which I selected the downpayent request related to DP I'm posting) all fields except the purchase order field that remains NOT filled ("space" ). So it should be filled by the user. I was asked to find a substitution in order to make this field automatically filled with the correct value without the user needs to fill it manually . The problem is that purchase order field seems to be related to another field called LPN (Long Procuerement Number ). Anyone can suggest a suitable enhancement for substitution ?
Thanks in advance...
Andrew

Thanks Tejas sir, AND VV sir,
Sri Problem resolved. But sir, we want while F-47 payment request special GL Indicator A in both case in F-48 too.. spl GL Indicator A only. while doing the same thing getting error.. see the error Below.
Special G/L indicator A is not defined for down payments
Message no. F5053
Diagnosis
The specified special G/L indicator is not classified as "down payment" or not listed in the list of the target special G/L indicators for indicator "F".
System Response
The entry is not accepted.
Procedure
Enter an allowed special G/L indicator or initiate a change of the default settings.
Kindly help me sir.
Thanks
Pranav Kr. Gupta
Note: i will give u the point. as well sir.

Uer exist / enhancement point for J1IEX and MIRO

Hi,
I want to know is there any user exit /enhancement pointt are available for J1IX and MIRO transaction, how to find the user exist of a transation.
regards,
zafar

Hi,
To find the user exit,
1. Goto the tarnsaction say MIRO.
2. Click on System and In that status.
3. Double click on the Program screen Which is under SAP data.
4. In that Program, Click on GOTO and find the package name. (It is MRM for MIRO Transaction).
5. Go to SMOD.
6. In the enhancement field click f4.
7. give the package name and execute and you will find list of User exits.
LMR1M001 User exits in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M002 Account grouping for GR/IR account maintenance
LMR1M003 Number assignment in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M004 Logistics Invoice Verification: item text for follow-on
LMR1M005 Logistics Inv. Verification: Release Parked Doc. for Po
LMR1M006 Logistics Invoice Verification: Process XML Invoice
MRMH0001 Logistics Invoice Verification: ERS procedure
MRMH0002 Logistics Invoice Verification: EDI inbound
MRMH0003 Logistics Invoice Verification: Revaluation/RAP
MRMN0001 Message output and creation: Logistics Invoice Verification.
8. Ask your ababper to check these exits functionality and use it as per your requirement.
Raj

XML scheme and Web services enhancement for MS Word integration in CRM 2007

Hi,
I am trying to use the Template designer and the web services tool in order to create a MS Word template for the quotation.
We have created a new web service, using the Web Service Tool
(transaction BSP_WD_CMPWB, type WS_DESIGN_TOOL). I can use this web service when creating a quotation word template and everything works fine.
I need to enhance the web service with some custom fields and logic. I found the blog:
Web-services enhancement for MS Word integration in CRM 2007
/people/community.user/blog/2008/11/18/web-services-enhancement-for-ms-word-integration-in-crm-2007
The blog describe how to enhance the web service, extend the output
structure etc.
We have done all the steps in the blog, and everything looks fine. When
we test the web service, using the Web Service Navigator, all the new
fields we added to the output structure are displayed. The WSDL
document also looks fine, displayed from the Web Service
Administration.
The problem occur when try to create the word template using the
Template Designer. The XML scheme is not displayed in the word
document. This only happens if we use an enhanced web service.
Anyone familiar with this issue?
Kind regards,
Johan Wigert

Hi,
You may have to upgrade your MS word 2003 to MS Word 2007.
Before you do that please opening View > toolbars > Task Pane and check if you can get XML Schema from the web service.
Regards,
Sandeep Chavan

Roles for ESS and MSS Enhancement Package 4 (EHp4)

Good afternoon.
I have the following doub with the role assignment for ESS .
I know that exist the following roles for ESS :
SAP_ESSUSER: Single role that comprises all non-country-specific fucntions. Only relevant for the olders ESS functionality, including all ITS component, such as PZ02(Address), PZ13(Personnel Data), PZ03(Bank Details).
SAP_ESSUSER_ERP05: Single role that comprises all non-country-specific fucntions. Relevant for the ERP2005 platform, Enhancement Package 1 and 2.
SAP_ESSUSER_ERP13: Composite role that comprises all non-country-specific functions. Relevant for the ERP2005 platform, Enhancement Package 3.
SAP_ESSUSER_ERP05_xx: Single role that comprises all non-country-specific fucntions. A separate role exist for each country version(xx = Country ID). The role corresponding composite role is SAP_ESSUSER_ERP05. Relevant for the ERP2005 platform, Enhancement Package 1 and 2.
The Question is:
I am working with Enhancement Package 4 EhP4, What is the role that I have that use????
Kind Regards.

Hi! The specific ESS Role for EHP4 is called SAP_ESSUSER_ERP_14.
Due to an error, the Role was not delivered in SAP ECC 604, but it will be available in the Support Package 05 for EHP4. You can hope to implement the SP or go for manual corrections from Note [1373177|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1373177].
1229232 and 1129412 notes are relevant for EHP3 only.
Refered to MSS you're right.
Regards!

Enhancement for Production Order Release and Batch Fixing.

Hi Experts,
I have assigned a enhancement for production order.The user exit is also given in the req as PPCO0001 through which i have to call a Z-Program for Batch fixing using Trans CO01 and release the order before saving once it is assigned to components.
Now my probs is where to start working for the enhancement -is it possible to use any BAPI instead of Batch (BDC) or I can use any BADI instead User Exit.
So if you guys have similar scenario worked on it or have similar example approach to solve it.Please do help.I will reward for all helpful answers.

I figured out thr friends !
Thanks,
SriRam

Enhancement for CS12 and CS13

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for