Enter an existing allocation structure - Message No: KD013

Hi Experts,
While creating the Internal Order I am getting below error. We are using SAP from last 7 years with same Internal Order Types
Enter an existing allocation structure
Message no. KD013
Diagnosis
You have entered a settlement structure which does not exist.
Procedure
Enter an existing settlement structure or define a new one in the implementation guide.

thanks for your quick reply.
I find out the solution.
T.CODE: OKO6
SPRO - Controlling - Internal Orders - Actual Postings - Settlement - Maintain Allocation Structures
We have maintained Allocation Structure which we have assigned in Order Types.
T.CODE: KOAL
Thanks & Regards,
Vijay

Similar Messages

Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1 for Internal Order

Hi,
During Internal order settlement through KO88 I am getting this error as :
Message no. KD503 - Complete allocation structure K1
Diagnosis :
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters). Cost element 430500 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure K1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure :
    Possible solutions are as follows:
    o   If the posting under cost element 430500 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
    o   If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose
    "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure. If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
-   You can update allocation structure K1
The same configuration in Development Server there is no error but problem occurs in Quality server. Here the process is Internal Order creation - Creation of Reservation through MB21- Goods Issue against reservation through MB1A and finally settlement through KO88. During settlement this error occur. In configuration setting of allocation structure under Internal Order I have mentioned only revenue settlement (as per business) against assignments. Under source mentioned cost element group and under settlement cost elment Receiver Cat is "CTR" and tick "By Cost Element".
During MB1A i.e, goods issue accounting entry is generated as
81(Dr). 430500 Constimptuion Saprae and Stores
99(Cr). 310411 Inventory Machinery and Spare.
During settlement this debit figure should credit. But not allowiing to credit. Even in configuration under settlement cost element if I remove the tick of "By cost element" and mention secondary gl account whose cost element category is 21, still showing the same error in QA server. What may be the probabale solution ? Even if i remove allocation structure K1 from settlement profile 20 still same error exist. How this link gets during settlment inspite of removing allocation structure from settlement profile...
NB.. COPA is not implemented in our company. So PA structure should not arrise here....
Thanks & regards,
Samrat
Edited by: Samrat Roy on Aug 30, 2010 7:28 PM

Hi Samrat,
The issue is very simple.. Cost element 430500 is posted in your IO...
While settling you have 2 options... Either you can credit the original GL account 430500.. This happens when you tick "By Cost element".. This you have done already...
2nd option is not to tick "By Cost element" and assign a secondary cost ele category 21...
But for any of these options to work, you have to include GL 430500 in the "source"... The above 2 options apply only to those GL accounts which are mentioned in the "Source".... for rest of the GL accounts, system gives this error
Include 430500 in your "source" cost ele group.. Error will be resolved
Regards
Ajay M

Complete allocation structure Z4 Message no. KD503

Complete allocation structure Z4
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 90001000 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z4, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 90001000 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure Z4
Please help resolve error below.
What do I need to reverse?
Is there a different way to enter actual cost for this?
What do you think is missing in my allocation structure?

Hi paul
This error message you are getting KD503
This message comes up at the time of settlement of the order when you are transferring the cost from on cost object to the other. Here you are giving the final cost settlement on the asset so the final asset is where all the cost is going to get settle for the cost which you have taken in the internal order. you have to define a roadmap for the cost elements which is carrying the cost from the IO to the final asset.
The resolution Is do the following: go to KO88 and explore the juke box where you have booked all the jv take note of all those cost elements now come to KSES and here under Z4 allocation structure give CO area and go to source tab and give the range of cost elements that you have used in ko88 and save it
This will resolve your issue.
Kind regards
Arman
SAP FICO

Error : complete allocation structure while doing Ko88 settlement.

Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element S10100 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure A2, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element S10100 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure A2

Dear,
Please refer my reply in this thread,
Error in Rework order settlement
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Allocation Structure

Hi,
When we execute the T.code KO88(Order Settlement for AUC), showing the below Error Message.
Complete allocation structure A1
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 410006 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure A1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 410006 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure A1
We have assigned Cost element for Receiver Cat. FXA.
What is the Problem?
Thanks in advance

In the allocation structure you need to include the source CE 410006.
Allocation Structure>Assignments (double click)>Source (double click)
Here in source you should have the CE mention in From else you should have created a CE group including this CE.
And now for this source ensure you've maintained the Settlement cost element (for FXA) either 'By Cost Element' or Settlement cost element.
Regards
Sreenivas

Error In allocation Structure when doing settlement to GL from WBS

Hi All,
I got this error message. What should i do? I try to check my allocation structure...but it seem correct.
Complete allocation structure Z3
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 901000 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z3, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
If the posting under cost element 901000 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
If the posting was made correctly, you can do the following:
a) You can assign a different allocation structure to the sender: In the master data maintenance for the sender, choose "Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters" and then enter a different allocation structure.
If necessary, also check whether the correct allocation structure is entered in the settlement profile. The allocation structure is defaulted in the settlement profile when you create sender master data or when you maintain the settlement rule.
You can update allocation structure Z3

Hi Sreenivas ,
The accounting document looks weird :
Hi,
Settlement profile : ZPS001
GL, CC, Order, WBSE and FXA optional
Document type : SA (GL Account doc)
Distribution rule : 10
Residence time : 24
Allocation strucutre Z3
Default object type : FXA
tick on % settlement and equivalence no
to be settled in full
Allocation structure : Z3
Assignment : 1.Labour ,2.MAterial, 3. Subcontract
Source : 1. PSlabour , 2.PSmaterial 3. PSsubcon 4.Cost
Settlement cost center : FXA (ticl by CE), CTR (settlement cost element 90200) ; ORD (Settlement cost element 902001); GL put 747100f
I already successfully settle from WBS to GL 747100(settlement receiver) However, when i check FB03 it shows that
GL account 747100
Posting key 40
Amount 25000
GL Account 747100
Posting key 50
Amount -25000
What the problem ?
Cheers,
Nies

Allocation structure issue

Dear sap,
cost elements that have been used for postings to our projects but the cost elements are not included in the allocation structures.
As a consequense are the settlements ot the projects malfunctioning.
Cost element     Allocation structure     Malfunctioning WBS
190198           KO                                  389001938.00002
497162          KP                                   47800439.04
How to update the allocation structures to include the above cost elements.
Reg
Umi

Hi,
Go to Allocation Structure which you are using for this and see what is the cost element group or range you entered in the Allocation structure.
Once you find the range or cost element group, you need to include the above cost elements into the Ranges or cost element groups.
Your issue will be solved..
Thanks

WBS settlement issue:Complete allocation structure A1.Message no. KD503

hi all
I created an WBS 600041 and through FB60 posted the JV by assigning the WBS 600041.
Then I saw in CJI3 the posting is done and it is showing there and I created a settlement rule and gave the 100 % cost settlement on AUC and saved it. Now when I go to CJ88 and do the actual settlement and gave all the parameters for full settlement and execute it is giving the following error
Complete allocation structure A1.Message no. KD503
Is this problem due to cost elements? How do I go about it.please suggest.
kind regards
Aman

HI,
Check your allocation structure OKO6 transaction. see whether your allocation structure is having the expense cost element you posted listed in it
OKO6- select your allocation structure-Assignments-source
Here the GL account should be listed
Regards,
Radha

Complete allocation structure 60 (message # kd503)

Hi,
I am facing this error message while doing Settlement of Internal Orders and the solution provided by SAP is not possible because instead of reversing the posting, it was reclassified by users and now the settlement is not possible and the recommendation also does not apply here.
What alternatives there are?
Regards
Roger

> If you do not want to change the allocation
> structure,
> Write a jorunal entry to make the books correct and
> close the order to future activity.
> We use this process as a clean up step of last resort
> .
>
> Althea
Hello, Althea.
Could you advise step-by-step process for this?
As I understand it should look the following way:
1) Do G/L posting from Project Account to AuC
2) Close PO (how it can be done?)
3) Create new PO for WBS
4) Run settlement
Am I correct? If PO was closed, does settlement run do not check its postings and do not return errors KD503?

KO88 - message KD503 'Complete allocation structure ZD'

Hello,
Need some help regarding settlement error KD503 a user is getting via KO88. User made posting to an incorrect primary cost element (611010). That cost element is NOT included in the allocation structure and it should not be included. The user reversed out the incorrect posting and tried to settle the IO. The KO88 transaction still yields KD503 error. Any ideas what the problem is?
Both transactions were made in currency 'SGD'. When running S_ALR_87012993 to check line item total for 611010 in IO, balance is 0 in 'SGD' but $.06 in CO area currency. Would this be causing the issue?
I'd appreciate your immediate help! I've attached files in case it helps.

Hi Mathew
Nice to be talking to you again
The balance of .06 is not the issue.. You posted a line item in the IO... And then reversed it
So, from system's point of view, it has 2 line items in the IO to be settled..
You will have to include this cost element temporarily in your allocation structure, as a formality.. Once the settlement is done, you can remove it again
Include this Cost ele under any assignment in your allocation structure.. Impact would be null because the 2 line items nullify each other
Br. Ajay M

How to remove overlap of cost element in allocation structure?

hi experts,
on KSES the source has double entry of cost element. those cost elements were defined under cost element group. when i checked on the Source screen the entries under the cost element group there is no double entry but when checked on Extras > Overview List i can see two entries of the cost element. how can i remove on the double entry of cost element on the source of the allocation structure?
thanks!

Hi,
Go to KAH2 . enter cost element group.
Select the cost element to be deleted , then select arrow (upwars left , 3rd button from top left) , right click and then remove.
Regards,
Mrinal

While Doing Production Order Settlement "Complete Allocation structure" :

Dear Experts
I am Getting This Problem ,
please give me A suitable Solution.
I am created Another Allocation Structure And Assigned to Settllement Profile . But it is not trigering. Not Capturing That allocation
Complete allocation structure Z1
Message no. KD503
Diagnosis
During settlement, the system puts the sender debits into groups (assignments), which are settled using the same settlement cost element. The settlement assignment is made in the allocation structure, which is stored in the settlement rule for the sender (under settlement parameters).
Cost element 40512006 cannot be assigned to a settlement cost assignment in allocation structure Z1, and therefore it cannot be assigned to a settlement cost element.
Procedure
Possible solutions are as follows:
u2022 If the posting under cost element 40512006 was made to the sender because of an incorrect entry, and you can reverse the posting, and do not need to update the allocation structure. You only need to reverse the incorrectly assigned posting before repeating the settlement. Exception: For an investment measure with a line item settlement, you need to extend the allocation structure, even after the reversal.
Edited by: rajamallu on Jul 2, 2010 10:41 AM

Hi,
within allocation structure customizing you create assignments for allocation structure Z1.
Each assignment has a source (cost element, cost element range, cost element group).
The cost element 40512006 is not included in the source definition of allocation structure Z1 but there are values to be settled available on your sender.
Thus they cannot be settled and thats why the message occurs. So maintain alloc. structure Z1 completely.
Best regards, Christian

Import already existing directory structure into DFS namespace?

Hi all,
I'm planning to migrate three file servers to a single DFS namespace and after reading the official docs and numerous blog posts I'm still unsure about the right way to do it.
The "main" server already has a share with a complex directory structure, called \\server1\team, and that share shall become the root of the new DFS namespace, lets call it \\domain.local\team.
Part of that already existing directory structure is this folder: \\server1\team\admin\communication\archive. The folder "archive" contains thousands of files in numerous folders and shall become a dfs link to another share \\server2\archive. But
before I can create the folder "archive" as a dfs link I have to create the folder "admin" in the dfs hierarchy of course, then below that the folder "communication"
Question: When I try to create a folder "admin" in the dfs namespace, I get the error message "the folder cannot be created in the namespace. The file exists."
Ok, the folder "admin" indeed exists, but how can I "import" this branch of the existing directory hierarchy into the dfs namespace?
Do I have to rename the existing folder "admin" to e.g. "admin2", then create the dfs folder "admin" and move the complete directory structure below "admin2" to "admin"? Or can I simply make the existing folder
"admin" a dfs folder?
Thanks in advance!
Regards
Christoph

Mandy, thanks for your feedback!
I have to describe my problem more precisely: creating the root of the new DFS namespace is *not* the problem. This worked for me exactly as you expained it. The problem appears when I try to create a folder below that root in the DFS namespace. If that
folder already exists in the share you cannot choose how to handle security settings but you get an error message, and that's it.
This may be helpfull to explain what I want to achieve:
Old structure:
\\server1\team - folder admin - subfolder "archive" - lots of subfolders and files
Now I want to move all files and folders from "archive" to \\server2\archive and link this share into the new DFS namespace, so that our users don't notice any change when they access that archive folder.
new structure:
1. Create DFS namespace root: \\domain.local\team -> \\server1\team   (works!)
            |
2. Create folder admin (problem!)
            |
3. Create subfolder "archive" -> \\server2\archive (not possible becaues "admin" couldn't be created)
I could perhaps create a DFS namespace with the root \\server1\team\admin\archive and link that to \\server2\archive, but I would like to avoid creating a new namespace for each share which from \\server2 which I mount into some subfolder of \\server1\team...
Thanks for reading.
Regards
Christoph

The filename you entered already exists...

When I attempt to save over an existing page (in order to
replace it), I get the following error message:
The filename you entered already exists. Please enter a
different filename.
How can a save over a file without being roadblocked by this
error? Is it that Contribute is creating LCK files, and if so, is
there a setting in Contribute that will prevent these LCK files
from being created?
Any suggestions?

You or your administrator has to give you rights to delete
files.

Complete Allocation Structure A1

Hi everyone,
I have a problem concerning settlement of orders. Running transaction va88 gives me an error message stating that I should complete allocation structure a1. However, this is not the allocation structure I want to use. The message says that I can assign a different allocaton structure to the sender by chosing Settlement Rule --> Goto --> Settlement Parameters in the master data of the sender.
Now my question is where to find the master data of the sender!? Thanks for your help!
Regards,
Martin

Hi,
I have solved this issue now. Changed the allocation structure. Now I still have one problem concerning an account which is not maintained in the strucutre. However, to assign this cost element to the right part of the structure is something my controlling people have to figure out.
Thanks anyway for all you help.
Regards,
martin

Enter an existing allocation structure - Message No: KD013

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for