Enter event not triggering for read-only checkbox

I have some objects in a form that get "locked" when the user signs the form. I'm not using the digital signatures. Instead, when the user types their name into the signature text field, a script runs on the change event that makes all of the fields in the form read only. It also unlocks the fields if the signature is deleted.
I was worried that we would get a lot of phone calls with users that didn't understand that the form had locked ("Why doesn't this form work?!"), so I added some code to the enter event for all of the fields that would pop up a messagebox to explain to people trying to edit a signed form that the form was locked and that they would need to delete the signature to edit the form.
This plan works perfect for my text fields and decimal fields. It does NOT work at all for my checkboxes. For some reason, the enter event is never triggered for read-only checkboxes. I don't see any other events that would obviously work for me though. Any ideas?
Thanks

Thanks, those are reasonable suggestions.
In the first suggestion, I'm unclear about one aspect of how I would accomplish this. I assume I would allow people to modify fields in the form, but that when they did, a msgbox would pop up that would inform them that, if they continued with this modification to a signed form, the signature would be removed. I'm all good to that point. But if they answered that they do not want to continue modifying that field and removing the signature, how can I code it to set the value back to what it was before the change? Is there some method that will give me access to the value of the field BEFORE the attempted modification? I went looking for something like $.previousvalue, but found nothing.
I'd suggest that I could use a two-stage solution, in which I store the previous value on the enter event, and save it just in case they do not want to change the field when prompted by the msgbox, but since the enter event does not exist for checkboxes (my original problem), that seems like it won't work.
As far as radio button suggestion, I like radio buttons very much except for one fatal flaw: they aren't (as far as I can tell) clearable. That is a shame. Clearly some people (like me) want both exclusivity AND clearability. And we'd like the controls to have an enter event. But I know I'm demanding Anyway, as it is, I just end up having to use checkboxes and create a boatload of silly code to make them exclusive.
Emily

Similar Messages

SharePoint 2010 List View Web Part not showing for read-only users?

Hello all,
I have List View Webparts on my Blank Web Part page, and it's not showing for Read-Only users.
Is this intended by Microsoft or is it a bug?
Thank you!

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that the read only user could not see the list view web part.
Per my knowledge, the issue may be cause that the user do not have the proper permission for the list.
1. Check whether the user can access the list.
2. Check whether the user can view all the items instead of partial items in the list.
3. Check whether there are some fields refer to other lists or terms, especially the lookup field or managed metadata filed.
If that is the case, make sure the user can access the lookup list.
Thanks,
Jason
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Jason Guo
TechNet Community Support

This operation is not available for read only field 'Type MVF'

Hi All,
We are using OrderToCash PIP and we are on Siebel 8.1X.
While Synching the customer from Ebiz to Siebel facing the following issues:
Method 'WriteRecord' of business component 'Account' (integration component 'Account') for record with search specification '[Row Id] = "2d3434313239353"' returned the following error:"This operation is not available for read only field 'Type MVF'.(SBL-DAT-00402)"(SBL-EAI-04451)
Please suggest us what steps to be done in Siebel.
Thanks
Maanasa

First check the process why this is calling Account BC WriteRecord(). The field "Type MVF" might be read only and this sync process is trying to update this field which is read only. This is the reason for the error. Check the OM log / EAI Obj Manager Comp log (set log level to 5) and check.
Joseph Arul Dass

SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges Not Working for Read Only Permissions Users

I have the following code in a method that generates tabbed web parts on any page in SharePoint 2010.
The problem is that it will not work for users who have Read access only on a SharePoint site. It will work when those users have Contribute access.
So even though I have elevated permissions in the code it does not actually elevate the permissions at the point where it is needed.
if (panel != null)
try
using (SPLimitedWebPartManager wpManager = SPContext.Current.Web.GetLimitedWebPartManager(HttpContext.Current.Request.Url.ToString(), PersonalizationScope.Shared))
try
// Elevated previleges required for EXPORT and IMPORT. Else Users with normal read access will get errors.
SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(delegate()
// Retrieve the web part titles in the ConfigureTabs XML string for this tab.
var webPartTitles = from t in xDocument.Descendants("webPart")
where (string)t.Parent.Attribute("name") == (string)e.Item.DataItem
select (string)t.Attribute("title");
foreach (string wpTitle in webPartTitles)
foreach (System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts.WebPart webPart in wpManager.WebParts)
// Find the matched closed web part in WebParts collection
if (webPart.Title == wpTitle && webPart.IsClosed == true)
string errorMessage;
//ADD EXPORT PROPERTY
webPart.ExportMode = WebPartExportMode.All;
MemoryStream stream = new MemoryStream();
XmlTextWriter writer = new XmlTextWriter(stream, System.Text.Encoding.UTF8);
// Export the closed webpart to a memory stream.
wpManager.ExportWebPart(webPart, writer);
writer.Flush();
stream.Position = 0;
XmlTextReader reader = new XmlTextReader(stream);
// Import the exported webpart.
System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts.WebPart newWebPart = wpManager.ImportWebPart(reader, out errorMessage);
reader.Close();
writer.Close();
// Show the imported webpart.
panel.Controls.Add(newWebPart);
break;
catch (Exception ex)
// For debugging use only.
Label label = new Label();
label.Text = "Please check your XML configuration for error. " + Environment.NewLine + ex.Message;
panel.Controls.Add(label);
catch (Exception ex)
// For debugging use only.
Label label = new Label();
label.Text = "Please Check SPContext.Current.Web is not null. " + Environment.NewLine + ex.Message;
panel.Controls.Add(label);
This snippet of code was originally pulled from a microsoft technet article on creating Tabbed web parts "the correct way" but it doesn't work in all scenarios.
Is there a way to get this code working for Read/Visitors to a SharePoint site?

From initial observation what I see is that your SPLimitedWebPartManager is not created from an elevated web. Try like below
SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(delegate()
using(SPSite elevatedSite = new SPSite(SPContext.Current.Site.ID))
using(SPWeb elevatedWeb = elevatedSite.OpenWeb())
using (SPLimitedWebPartManager wpManager = elevatedWeb.GetLimitedWebPartManager(HttpContext.Current.Request.Url.ToString(), PersonalizationScope.Shared))
{ //Rest of your code
Geetanjali Arora | My blogs |

Style Code Not Working for Read Only Users !

Hi
Can anyone help us with this issue. We have created some special Styling code in order to hid the Quick Launch on the home page of our main SharePoint site. The Styling works no problem at
all for users with edit rights, however we found that the styling did not work for users with read only access. What we found was that if we switched on the "Edit Items - Edit items in lists, edit documents in document libraries, and
customize Web Part Pages in document libraries." in the List Permissions for the Permission Levels for the Read Access group, the Styling then works no problem at all. HOWEVER it then gives those users the ability to EDIT the site page, as it then
puts the Edit option on the page top right for the user to click and then mess up the web page, which we can not permit.
SO..... How do we get this styling to work for ALL user types ?

Hi,
This usually happens when the CSS file is not published or approved, please check it.
If the CSS files uploaded in the Style Library, please check whether you had to check in those CSS files or not.
Best Regards
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

'CHANGE' event not triggering for BTE 2214 on park/change from FBV1/FBV2

I have designed a workflow template for FI parking. If the parked document is rejected, i need to trigger FIPP 'CHANGE' event for sending workitem to approver when someone changes the parked document. In SWEL event trace, the 'CHANGE' event is not getting raised.
So i implemented a BTE 000002214 and now i am able to raise 'CHANGE' event and capture it in workflow. But this is only working when i park a document using FV50 transaction and later change it.
But when i park a document using FBV1 and then make changes from FBV2, the 'CHANGE' event is not being triggered in SWEL. Should i implement some other BTE like 2218 etc? Can you please help?

Hi Gokul,
You can try handling the SAVE event instead of the CHANGED event.
T-code FBV2 will not allow you to save the document unless you make some changes.
Try implementing BTE 2218 and revert.
Thanks,
Sreekanth

Event not triggering for SWEC entry (MM_SERVICE) on create

Hi All,
I have been trying to trigger a customised event for BUS2009 based on creation of the Change Object MM_SERVICE. I have created an entry in SWEC as follows:
- Change Doc Object: MM_SERVICE
- Object Cat : BOR
- Object Type: BUS2009
- Event: RELEASEDREQCHANGED
- On Create
(no field conditions)
However, the event does not seem to publish upon an insert of ESUH-SUMLIMIT (Overall Limit on the Purchase Req - a field in Change Object MM_SERVICE), as I am not seeing the event in SWEL. Please note I have also tried to do this with field conditions in SWEC, but to no avail.
Alternatively, I have tried to setting the Change Doc config via SWU_EWCD, however, it comes back with an error message saying "No change document object for business object type BUS2009" - I believe this might have to do with the incompatibility of the key structures between MM_SERVICE and BUS2009. We have written a function module to overcome this problem and placed same in SWEC, which is why the (BUS2009) event is currently publishing for "on change" of MM_SERVICE - is there any way around this?
On the other hand, the event will publish OK if the SWEC entry is amended to "ON CHANGE" (with field conditions) - upon changing the value of ESUH-SUMLIMIT, not insert/create.
Would anyone be able to kindly advise how I can get the event to publish upon "ON CREATE" as well?
Thanks in advance.
~Andy.

Thanks for your prompt response Surjith.
However, I believe the above setup in SWEC is already configured for the purpose of triggering the event. The customised event in BUS2009 (RELEASEDREQCHANGED) is linked to the Change Document Object MM_SERVICE via "on create" in SWEC - it's just that there are no events coming up in SWEL
I have exactly the same config setup for RELEASEDREQCHANGED, MM_SERVICE via "on change" - and this is working perfectly fine (ie. I can see the event in SWEL whenever there is a change in any of the restricted fields of MM_SERVICE).
My understanding is that upon "on create" (in SWEC), it is not necessary to set up field restrictions in order to publish the event. In any case, I have tried to trigger the event both with and without any field restrictions, none of which came up with any event when a field in MM_SERVICE has been inserted. This is the reason why I tried SWU_EWCD instead, however, due to the incompatibility in the key structure between BUS2009 and MM_SERVICE, the transaction did not allow me to complete the setup.
Is there any way around this?
Many thanks.
~ Andy

BSEG.CREATED event not triggering when a document is posted in FB60

Hi All,
I have a requirement in which i need to post documents in FB60/FB65/FB01 tcode. But when i post the document in FB60 the event BSEG.CREATED is not triggering. I could not see any trace in SWEL. But when i park the document in FB60, FIPP.CREATED event is getting triggerd.
Can anyone tell me why this BSEG.CREATED event is not triggering.
Thanking you in advance,
satheesh.

Hi Viji,
Thanks for your quick reply.
We have maintained the required configurations in the system related to this. But still the event BSEG.CREATED is not triggering.
for this the alternative solution is to implement the BTE '1030'. But our functional team is asking us to check whey standard business object BSEG.CREATED is not triggering when we post a document. So that particular reason we are not able to find out.
Configuration maintained.
1) Created a workflow variant and assigned it to particular company code(OBWA and OBWJ).
2) Checked the 'Posting' release' and 'Release payments' checkboxes in the OBWA transaction.
3) Event linkage for BSEG is active.(SWETYPV)
Thanks,
satheesh

Default value for Read-Only Picklist Field

Hi, all--
I would like to have a default value ("Undetermined") for the "Associated Account" read-only picklist value. I have an account record of this value for this purpose. This is because if there is no value in the field, the record will not be included in a report that includes the field. I do not want to make the field required at this point.
Field management doesn't appear to allow any default value for read-only picklists. Does anyone know how to get around this, either at the lead record stage or at the lead report stage (without resorting to an analytic, which won't work for what we are doing)?
Thanks.

That's a great question. It doesn't appear as though you can select it from the typical method of Admin | Application Customization | Lead | Lead Field Setup | Associated Account.
Have you tried creating a workflow to populate the field using Before Modified Record Saved?

Best practice for read-only functionality

Hi,
I'm part of the development team of a system with about 100 screens. The customer would like us to add some read-only functionality to the system, so that certain users are able to access the screens but not change any of the data on them. We already have policies in place on the database level that keeps read-only users from saving data, but it's not very user friendly to allow users to change data on a screen, only to tell them that they're not allowed to save those changes once they try to do so. It would clearly be better if all components are rendered as read-only components for read-only users, making them unable to make any data changes in the first place.
User privileges in the system are controlled by roles defined and set in the system (not ADF roles or Weblogic roles). At any given time and place, it's possible to check whether the current user has a certain role. We already use this in a number of places to make it possible to control which user has access to which screens. In a few places we even control which functionality should be enabled for the current user within a screen, but mostly the access control is currently on the screen level. With read-only users getting access to all screens, it seems we will need lot of extra in-screen access control to keep these users from changing anything.
But what's the best practice here? One way to go would be to add some logic to every single active component on every single screen, to determine whether it should be rendered as active or disabled/read-only. But that would require a lot of extra coding.
So my question is: Is there a smarter way to do this? Maybe something done through skinning? Or something else?
(I'm not sure how relevant this is for this sort of question, but we're currently using JDev 11.1.1.4.0, and expect to upgrade to 11.1.1.6.0 within the next 6 months)
Best regards,
Andreas

Hi Guna, Puthanampatti and Don,
Thanks a lot for your replies. I'm currently looking into implementing something along the lines of what Guna has suggested:
Our application consists of a number of individual work spaces that are deployed as adflibs which have all been added to a "master application work space", and the master application is deployed as an .ear file. Most of the individual work spaces are for all the different functional areas of the application, with their own task flows, page fragments etc. The rest are work spaces with common functionality, like datamodel (entity definitions), utility methods, page templates, and framework extensions. In the latter, we have defined custom classes for all the base classes (somewhat similar to what Don describes, I believe).
In our custom class for ViewRowImpl, I have added an isAttributeUpdateable method, and in our custom class for ApplicationModuleImpl I have added an isReadOnlyUser method. The isAttributeUpdateable method uses the isReadOnlyUser method to determine if the current user is a read-only user or not; if the user is a read-only user the isAttributeUpdateable method will return false, otherwise true. The isReadOnlyUser method in our base class is just a dummy method that always returns true. But in the ApplicationModuleImpl classes of our individual work spaces, i've written an override for isReadOnlyUser, giving the answer that is relevant for the work space in question (for instance, whether or not the current user has the role "User Administrator").
That pretty much takes care of all input fields in tables and forms, which is a big step in the right direction. This still leaves some work to be done for components that are not directly linked to view object attributes (like buttons), but I guess that can't be helped. Also, there are a few of the work spaces that contain a number of pages that are related to different user privileges (as in: page 1 requires user privilege A, and page 2 requires user privilege B); in these cases I will have to do something different than just writing an override in the "local" ApplicationModuleImpl class.
@Don: What you describe seems to be pretty close in functionality to what we already have, though your implementation is different from ours. You have used your custom base ApplicationModuleImpl class to keep read-only users from committing changes. We use Virtual Private Database and database policies to the same end: If a user without the required full-access role tries to commit data it will cause a database error, which we then handle in the application (so the user gets a message like "You don't have the required privileges to changes this data", rather than an ORA message). Unfortunately, our customers are not content with this. They want a solution where all input fields and most of the buttons etc. are disabled for read-only users, and that's why I'm looking into the best/smartest way to do this.
@Puthanampatti: We already use something similar to what you're suggesting. The challenge I'm currently facing is how best to disable/enable components based on the current user's roles, not how to determine and store those roles.
Best regards,
Andreas

~/oradiag_$USER/.. and "Directory does not exist for read/write" issue

Hi.
Recently I've discovered that ADR was creating a folder in one of ours Oracle 11.2.0.1 server, in the users home like ~/oradiag_$USER/.. The problem is that this logging files dont stop growning, and they are filled only with this lines:
Wed Apr 11 13:40:06 2012
Directory does not exist for read/write [usr/oracle/product/11.2.0/log] [usr/oracle/product/11.2.0/log/diag/clients]
Wed Apr 11 13:40:06 2012
Directory does not exist for read/write [usr/oracle/product/11.2.0/log] [usr/oracle/product/11.2.0/log/diag/clients]
Wed Apr 11 13:40:06 2012
Directory does not exist for read/write [usr/oracle/product/11.2.0/log] [usr/oracle/product/11.2.0/log/diag/clients]
Wed Apr 11 13:40:06 2012
Directory does not exist for read/write [usr/oracle/product/11.2.0/log] [usr/oracle/product/11.2.0/log/diag/clients]
Wed Apr 11 13:41:06 2012
Directory does not exist for read/write [usr/oracle/product/11.2.0/log] [usr/oracle/product/11.2.0/log/diag/clients]
etc
I've searched around internet about this issue all that I've found is a "workaround" by creating those folders. And yep, it works, it stops growning.
Then I checked the others servers that we have, and the problem replicates in some servers with the same Oracle version.
My question is: Why this? Why in some servers ADR is looking for that folder? That folder didnt exist in any of them, but only some servers tries to read/write on it (or, at least, log it) What parameter relies on it?
Regards.

Metalink note
11g Sqlnet Log Shows Error "Directory does not exist for read/write" [ID 797678.1]
Errors Filling log.xml and sqlnet.log: Directory does not exist for read/write [opt/oracle/oemagent/agent11g/log] [ID 1291286.1]

Is it possible to make comments or notes on a read only pdf document?

Is it possible to make comments or notes on a read only pdf document? Thank you.

With Preview you can use the annotations feature. There's a free application, Skim, that is designed for annotating and making notes on PDFs.
OT

Calculated (Read-Only) checkbox is missing

Hi,
I am trying to create a new field via AET.
i want to create a calculated field but i dont see the Calculated (Read-Only) checkbox in field details while creating.
Could any one please let me know why is that checkbox not seen? does this has anything to do with version?
Thanks,
Rajini A.

Did you try by enabling the Expert Mode?

Release strategy not triggering for Specif plant

Hi Friends
I configured a release strategy with three charecteristics. P.org, Plant, Net value.
this stretegy is triggering for specific plants which are under a particular company code, and if I change to my plant and P.org. its not triggering.
I have deleted all the classifications and release strategies from, no other data in VV_T16FS_2 , AUSP,T16FV,and T16FS tables except this release strategies data.
do we have any settings at cocode level??????
please respond if answer known
Points would be awarded for for your valuable answer.

Thank you deepak for your quick respond
Actually There were already release strategies with same charecteristics, and with the values of other plants and other P.orgs which are under certain companycode.
these were triggering perfectly for PO
Now created new strategy for plant and P.org under different plant code of different cocde. this strategy not triggering for PO.
but if the release strtegy values replaced by the erlier plants and P.org again its triggering.
Now I created new chars, class, and stategies still same problem persists.
Release stategy working for the values of a prticular company code plants, Porgs.
and already tried your suggestion Cocode as char. but same its working for only that company code not for my companycode

Invalid operation for read only resultset:

Hi.
I'm developing an app that connects to Oracle, but I ran into the following problem:
When I create a Statement, I specify
that I need an Updatable ResultSet with the following code:
Statement stmt = conn.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_SENSITIVE,
ResultSet.CONCUR_UPDATABLE);
ResultSet rset =stmt.executeQuery(somesql);
When I try to update the ResultSet, I get an SQLException: java.sql.SQLException: Invalid operation for read only resultset: updateString
Am I
doing something wrong or is this a bug?
Any info is greatly appreciated.
null

There are limitations on the kinds of queries you can perform. If the query is not suitable for update, it reverts back to readonly automatically. Read the below article about limitations and examples.
http://technet.oracle.com/doc/oracle8i_816/java.816/a81354/resltse2.htm
null

Enter event not triggering for read-only checkbox

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for