EP (AS Java ) is taking time more Time to comeup
Hi Experts,
We Have Implemented EP (AS JAVA). When we start the system it is taking more than 90 minutes to startup. Our Database is IBM DB2.we are having 2 EP instances in the same Database (MCOD) in which only one is in use.
kindly can any one tell me what is the normal time taken for system startup and the parameters to be checked for the same . our system details are as given below :
OS - Windows 2003 service pack 2
Processor - Intel Pentium 4 (3 GHz)
Total Page Memory allocated : 11.5 GB
RAM - 3 GB
Your Help/Input would be highly appreciated
Regards,
Santosh Chaitanya
Normally, It takes around 15 to 25 mints.
Similar Messages
-
After upgrading to lion starting up is taking much more time ??
After upgrading to lion starting up is taking much more time is there any solution to this ?
i do all things about cleaning disk permission or editing .Have you check what is being started at the same time?
Lion will start more applications then were being started in the past.
Allan -
T-code SUIM taking much more time for generating output for profie change.
Hi All
We want to extract report for profile addition and deletion for Users in ECC 6. While executing the the t-code SUIM it is taking much more time (taking more than 20 hrs). This problem is coming after patch application
Please give the solution/Suggest to minimize the time taken in report generation.
Thanks-
Guru Prasad DwivediHello Prasad,
The reason for the performance trouble is a new feature regarding the user change documents. Since note 874850 and 1015043 you will get a more complete overview about the changes regarding a user.
The disadvantage of that new feature is, that in some customer system usage scenario, the performance is very poor. That's the case, if the central change documents are intensivly used also by other applications and the tables CDPOS, CDHDR, ... contains a very big count of rows. Unfortunatly the user change documents can not be searched by the key columns of the central change docs. - so the bad response time can explained.
What now ... ?
There are some work arounds to get the change documents on faster way.
1st. - You can get the former report output and performance if you
would use the report RSUSR100 instead of the new RSUSR100N in
separate mode.
2nd. - If you want to use the new report RSUSR100N directly and only
want to get the information about the traditional topics
(content of USH* tables) you should only mark the search areas
on the tabstrip 'user attributes') to get a better performance.
- furthermore limit the date range, if possible
3rd. - You should regulary (monthly) archive the user relevant documents
for PFCG and IDENTITY from the central change documents.
As per our note 1079207 chapter 3 you can reload that archives
into more selective tables.
The selection for change documents will be rather faster over
reloaded archived documents than the documents in the
central change documents tables.
Best Regards,
Guilherme de Oliveira. -
Test program running taking much more time on high end server T5440 than low end server T5220
Hi all,
I have written the following program and run on both T5440 [1.4 GHz, 95 GB RAM, 32 cores(s), 256 logical (virtual) processor(s),] and T5220 [(UltraSPARC-T2 (chipid 0, clock 1165 MH) , 8GB RAM, 1 core, 8 virtual processors )] on same OS version. I found that T5540 server takes more time than T5220. Please find below the details.
test1.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <pthread.h>
using namespace std;
#define NUM_OF_THREADS 20
struct ABCDEF {
char A[1024];
char B[1024];
void *start_func(void *)
long long i = 6000;
while(i--)
ABCDEF* sdf = new ABCDEF;
delete sdf;
sdf = NULL;
return NULL;
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
pthread_t tid[50];
for(int i=0; i<NUM_OF_THREADS; i++)
pthread_create(&tid[i], NULL, start_func, NULL);
cout<<"Creating thread " << i <<endl;
for(int i=0; i<NUM_OF_THREADS; i++)
pthread_join(tid[i], NULL);
cout<<"Waiting for thread " << i <<endl;
After executing the above program on T5440 takes :
real 0.78
user 3.94s
sys 0.05
After executing the above program on T5220 takes :
real 0.23
user 1.43s
sys 0.03
It seems that T5440 which is high end server takes almost 3 times more time than T5220 which is low end server.
However, I have one more observation. I tried the following program :
test2.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <pthread.h>
using namespace std;
#define NUM_OF_THREADS 20
struct ABCDEF {
char A[1024];
char B[1024];
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
long long i = 6000000;
while(i--)
ABCDEF* sdf = new ABCDEF;
delete sdf;
sdf = NULL;
return 0;
It seems that T5440 server is fast in this case as compaired to T5220 server.
Could anyone please help me out the exact reason for this behaviour as my application is slow as well on this T5440 server. I have posted earlier as well for the same issue.
Thanks in advance !!!
regards,
SanjayYou already asked this question...
48 hours earlier, and in the same Solaris forum space
Repeating the post isn't going to get you a response any faster, and actually now have people NOT respond because you are not showing any patience.
These are end-user community forums, not a place to expect Oracle Technical Support. There is no obligation that there be a response.
If you have a business-critical issue and hope to get accurate and timely response, then use your service contract credentials to open a Support request.
This new redundant post is locked.
Edit:
It appears that at the same time the O.P. posted this redundant thread, they also posted the same question to at least one other forum web site:
http://www.unix.com/solaris/229269-test-program-running-taking-much-more-time-high-end-server-t5440-than-low-end-server-t5220.html -
Application server 10g R2 taking time to load.
hi all.
i am using oracle Application server 10g R2 when i boot my windows server 2003 R2 then
its taking time to load application server more than 5 min what is the problem
why its taking time to load?
any onw knows?JVM (java virtual machine) If you have a full stack, infrastructure + BI forms you need 2 gb at least only to install, if you plan to make some work on it it could happen that the computer get very slow.
In opmn.xml file, in the seccion for the home container (or other you are using) there is a line for Start Parameters, there you have to use the -Xmx1024M to se the maximum JVM size to 1gb, for this you will have to restart the proc.
For forms also there are some procs where you manage the size of the memory and procs, you can see this in the Configuration Seccion into the EM Console.
Regards -
Is there a way to speed up the "Java Loading" screen time?
Hi.
I'm having a big problem with that. I'm running the JRE 1.6u3 on Windows XP SP 2, on an AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual 3800+ (2GB of RAM), and the "Java Loading" screen time of web started apps is too high (about 15 seconds when I just restarted the pc, and 10 seconds after the first load... is that right?).
What Web Start do when it is "loading" ? The loading time of a standard client VM is pretty faster (like, uh, 1/4 second?).
Thanks.
HidraliskThe Java Loading splash is only shown untill the Main class of java web start is invoked and can put up the download progress dialog. I don't know why it would be so sow, but this should be improved by the Java Quick Start featurew put in jdk 6u10 (see http://download.java.net/jdk6/)
the bug 6506138 has been escallated and is being vigorously investigated. (it would probably pertain more to the time durring which the download progress window is shown or beyond)
/Andy -
in one website, its taking time to load the page, on other PC its not taking any time( with internet explorer) in my PC other websites are opening quickly but this website takes too much time with firefox
Zepo wrote:
My iMac has been overwhelmed almost since I bought it new. After some digging the guiness bar suggested its my Aperture library being on the same
internal Tera byte drive as my operating system.
Having a single internal hard drive overfilled (drives slow as they fill) is very likely contributing to your problems, but IMO "my Aperture library being on the same internal Tera byte drive as my operating system" is very unlikely to be contributing to your problems. In fact the Library should stay on an underfilled (roughly, for speed, I would call ~half full "underfilled") internal drive, not on the Drobo.
Instead build a Referenced-Masters workflow with the Library and OS on an internal drive, Masters on the Drobo, OS 10.6.8 (there have been issues reported with OS 10.7 Lion). Keep Vault backup of the Library on the Drobo, and of course back up all Drobo data off site.
No matter what you do with i/o your C2D Mac is not a strong box for Aperture performance. If you want to really rock Aperture move to one of the better 2011 Sandy Bridge Macs, install 8 GB or more of RAM and build a Referenced-Masters workflow with the Library and OS on an internal solid state drive (SSD).
Personally I would prefer investing in a Thunderbolt RAID rather than in a Drobo but each individual makes his/her own network speed/cost decisions. The Drobo should work OK for referenced Masters even though i/o is limited by the Firewire connection.
Do not forget the need for off site backup. And I suggest that in the process of moving to your new setup it is most important to get the data safely and redundantly copied and generally best to disregard how long it may take.
HTH
-Allen Wicks -
Hi All
I am having a strange problem. The JSP file is taking to much of time to load and the IE doesnot responds properly even after the the page is loaded. I agree that the JSP has significant amount of Java code in it. What could be the problem?? The response from the server is coming fast. The page is taking time after recieving the response from server.
Regards
PrashantWhat could be the problem??Slow hardware, slow code, perhaps some other app is eating your resources, could be anything really. I think its time for a profiler.
The JSP file is taking to much of time to load and the IE doesnot responds properly even after the the page is loadedIE is the best browser for improper behavior, but how exactly is it misbehaving in your case? It might be a bad piece of javascript that is causing it head aches. -
Hi All,
Everyday we run a gl process. Gl posting is taking more 1 hr. Same way 4 gl posting run during gl process which is causing
performance delay.
I see in the the log file that below stage is taking time.
glpibr.concurrency() 02-MAR-2013 08:13:03
glpibr.concurrency() 02-MAR-2013 08:13:03
glpidb() 02-MAR-2013 08:46:41
glpidb() 02-MAR-2013 08:49:59
glpibr() 02-MAR-2013 08:49:59
This process itself takes more than 30 hours. It varies everyday. Sometime it takes 1 hr also.
insert into gl_balances
( set_of_books_id, code_combination_id, currency_code, period_name,
actual_flag, budget_version_id, encumbrance_type_id, last_update_date,
last_updated_by, period_type, period_year, period_num, period_net_dr, period_net_cr,
period_to_date_adb, quarter_to_date_dr, quarter_to_date_cr, quarter_to_date_adb, year_to_date_adb,
project_to_date_dr, project_to_date_cr, project_to_date_adb, begin_balance_dr, begin_balance_cr,
period_net_dr_beq, period_net_cr_beq, begin_balance_dr_beq, begin_balance_cr_beq, template_id, translated_flag )
select pi.set_of_books_id, pi.code_combination_id, pi.currency_code, pi.period_name, pi.actual_flag, pi.budget_version_id, pi.encumbrance_type_id, sysdate, :fnd_user_id, pi.period_type, pi.period_year, pi.period_num, 0, 0, NULL, 0, 0, NULL, NULL,
0, 0, NULL, 0, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, pi.template_id, pi.translated_flag from gl_posting_interim_50130 pi where not exists ( select 'X' from gl_balances b where b.set_of_books_id = pi.set_of_books_id and b.code_combination_id = pi.code_combination_id and b.currency_code = pi.currency_code and
b.period_name = pi.period_name and b.actual_flag = pi.actual_flag and
nvl(b.encumbrance_type_id, -1) = nvl(pi.encumbrance_type_id, -1) and
nvl(b.budget_version_id, -1) = nvl(pi.budget_version_id, -1) and decode(b.translated_flag, '', '-1', 'Y', '0', 'N', '0', 'R', '1', b.translated_flag) = decode(pi.translated_flag, '', '-1', 'Y', '0', 'N', '0', 'R', '1', pi.translated_flag) )Above query is taking more than 30 mins as i can see in awrreport . As per metalink note id - 1096873.1 it is due to gl_posting_interim tables which is locking the another gl_interim_posting tables. I dont see any lock but i can see lots of gl_posting_interim present in the database. As per my knowledge this table must be dropped after posting got over.
Env details -
Apps version - 11.5.10.2
DB version - 11.2.0.1
OS - IBM AIX 6.1
Please suggest.
ThanksPlease see these docs.
R11i GLTTRN Translation Performance Issue In INSERT INTO GL_BALANCES [ID 761898.1]
Information Center: Optimizing Performance for Oracle General Ledger [ID 1489537.2]
Performance Issue With Translation Program After Upgrading To 10G Database [ID 742025.1]
Deleting Summary Accounts Has Poor Performance [ID 1088585.1]
GL Posting Performance Issue at glpip2() [ID 280641.1]
GLPPOS Performance Issue After 9i To 10g Upgrade in gluddl.lpc [ID 1262020.1]
Thanks,
Hussein -
Hi All,
We have weekly maintainence for essbase cube. There are total 2 source cubes and target cubes for the reporting purposes. The target cubes are accessed through the
partitions. During weekend maintainence process we load the data into the cube and in the end we run the Partitionon.bat script to create partition betweeb the cubes
here the problem comes "the script is common for all the countries but for some countries the script excutes in 20 min and for some countries it takes nearly 1hr even
though the cube size is very less when compared with the countries which execute first".
Thanks in advance.Hi MattRollings ,
As i said we are having two types of partitions one is for statitic reports and the another for the dyanmic reporting. yes the script which we use to for partitionon will create the partitions. The Script is common for all the countries and the script runs like this
1.First it creates the Transparent partition.
2.Then to create the Replica it refreshes from the two source cubes after that aggregation happens asually.
The main problem comes here during the refresh from the source to the Target its taking time. To say exactly during the refresh from source to the replica its taking 15min. For the other countries its taking only 8 min of time.
I have gone ahead to compare two different countries replica cubes size what i found is that one country cube size is 2Gb and the another one is 2.5Gb the one which is having less size taking 20min to complete and the other one takes 1hr time. Even though the second one is .5GB extra when compared with the first it should take 25min to create the replica partition.
what might be reason to consume more time while creating replica partition? Is it dependent on Defined Blocks, Actual Blocks,Non missing leaf blocks etc?
Thanks Matt in advance. -
Hi experts,
From me23n trnasaction , when i click on print preview and take an output type system is taking time to display adobe form.
what could be the reason for this, custom program is linked to the adobe form.
Please help me in this regards, its u
jayant.Hi,
There are a number of elements;
The print progam
- Could contain inefficient database access or other slow running code
The adobe form
- Could have inefficient ABAP code in the interface initialisation
The ADS
- Could be under-speced or overloaded with requests
The frontend
- Could be under-speced, unable to launch the adobe viewer in a reasonable time
The first two you can identify using regular perfromance tuning techniques (search for more help), the other two would need basis or desktop support input. Also, you might need to consider the network that joins all of these steps together.
Regards,
Nick -
Phase PSCRGEN_DROP_SHD_TABLE taking time
Phase PSCRGEN_DROP_SHD_TABLE taking time, it is taking more than a day. Started yesterday afternoon and its still going on. How do I know its working or not. Which log its gives the updated info.
MuraliStep to /usr/sap/put/log
Sort the files by date and check the latest ones.
Markus -
Hi gurus:
I have a continuous problem while Publishing and Overwriting a Universe from IDT, new measures UPDATES quickly in Business Explorer / Information Spaces but taking time in dashboard to be updated. it approximately takes half an hour to be updated while accessing universe from dashboards.
Regards:
Jawad KhalidHi gurus:
I have a continuous problem while Publishing and Overwriting a Universe from IDT, new measures UPDATES quickly in Business Explorer / Information Spaces but taking time in dashboard to be updated. it approximately takes half an hour to be updated while accessing universe from dashboards.
Regards:
Jawad Khalid -
In firefox, the video from website "tv.vu.edu.pk" is not displaying even i have installed the latest version of JAVA. There rotates a circle around java monogram every time but video is not playing even it is working fine with internet explorer
It's not working here as well with Java 6 U25 on Linux.
-
Hello Experts,
I am running a procedure which is taking too much time during execution. How can I found that which statement or query in the procedure is taking time. Is there any package available to check this out.
Thanks & Regards,
ManishExecute the below query to find out the session id of the session in which your procedure is getting executed.
[c]
SELECT s.sid
,s.serial#
,ddl.name
,ddl.type
,ddl.owner
,s.status
,s.osuser
,s.machine
FROM dba_ddl_locks ddl
,v$session s
WHERE ddl.session_id = s.sid;
[\c]
Once you get the sid,execute the below query to know which DML its executing:
[c]
SELECT /*+ leading(s) */
s.sid
,s.serial#
,st.piece
,st.sql_text
,s.status
,s.osuser
,s.machine
FROM v$session s
,v$sqltext st
WHERE s.sql_hash_value = st.hash_value(+)
AND s.sid = &sid_from_above_query
ORDER BY st.piece;
[\c]
Regards
Arun
Maybe you are looking for
-
Why will my phone no longer work when calling an system with automated dialing, press 1 for this or 2 for that. Tells me not a valid number.
-
BW Browser: Open 3.x and 7.0 Query/Workbook - Issue with 7.0 Workbook
Dear All, We migrated to BI 7.0 in April. New Queries, Workbooks etc. we would like to create with the new functionality of 7.0. Currently the users are using the BW Browser to navigate and select their Queries/Workbooks/WebServices etc for their Bus
-
Upload excel file (xls) into internal table in SRM 4.0
Hi experts! I need upload a xls file into internal table (in ABAP report) in EBP machine for i work with data in the sheets. Can you help me? Best Regard!
-
Hi Gurus, i have small problem My virtual machine has 2 xeon processors and 8Gb Ram, which should be fine for normal work for (2 admins and 8-10 planners). but from time to time process hy69planning.exe takes all memory. as a results we couldn't use
-
I have an audio file I've fixed in STP but when I save it, it sounds like the original. Is there something I'm missing to lock in the changes I've made and export a new version?