EP not mandatory for SRM 7.01?

Hi all,
i'm wondering because someone told me, that the portal won't be mandatory for SRM 7.0 EHP1. Is it right?
Regards,
Danilo

Hi,
Portal-Independant Navigation Frame (Without Portal, with NetWeaver Business Client HTML) is available from SRM 7.0 SP06.
Regards,
Masa

Similar Messages

Approval workflow triggers when not expected for SRM PO & without Agent ??

Hi All,
We are using SRM 5.0 integrated with SAP MM backends.
We are frequently facing this problem, when a buyer creates a PO (in SRM) within his/ her Spending (Output) Limit, the PO approval workflow triggers and is not able to find an agent.
Although the workflow should not trigger as the PO value is below spend limit of the buyer......we are not able to understand this behaviour.
In such cases, the buyer is not able to issue the POs, since the POs show 'Awaiting Approval' status.
I can find such POs with SRM transaction SWI2_ADM1, but I can not do anything beyond that. I am not able to Forward or 'Complete Manually' such work-items.
Any idea how this problem can be fixed or if there is any SAP note available for same.......anything??
Has anyone faced this kind of problem before?? Please help.
Thanks,
Ruchika

please check from the workflow log , the workflow which the system is starting.
might be the system is able to start another workflow than the one which you are mentioning
use the transaction swi6 for workflow log , use the purchase order guid

What is true business proposition for SAP XI being mandatory for mySAP SRM

Hi,
Would like to know the true business/technical propostion which makes SAP XI the mandatory middleware for mySAP SRM business scenarios
1. Plan-Driven Procurement, and
2. Catalog Content Mangement
Appreciate a reason beyond single vendor/TCO dope we all know...
tnx,
renji

Hi Ranjan,
Solution Manager is not mandatory for SRM 7 implementation.
Only thing is Solution Manager contains best pratices for Project implementation e.g AS is process , to be process, blue print etc.
It is just a guilde. All things might not be required for your project.
We did it without solution Manager except that we used it for generating installation key & for maintainance opt.
Best Wishes,
Tushar.

Is SAP Solution manager mandatory for SRM7 implementation?

Dear experts,
I get to know that use of SAP solution manager is mandatory for SRM 7 implementation. is it true?
what is the best practice to manage a SAP SRM implementation project? should we manage the project in SAP SM or outside of it?
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan
Ranjan Sutradhar

Hi Ranjan,
Solution Manager is not mandatory for SRM 7 implementation.
Only thing is Solution Manager contains best pratices for Project implementation e.g AS is process , to be process, blue print etc.
It is just a guilde. All things might not be required for your project.
We did it without solution Manager except that we used it for generating installation key & for maintainance opt.
Best Wishes,
Tushar.

Note 762640 - Drag and drop in Transaction PPOMA_BBP for SRM 7.0

Hi, All!
Does anybody know about analog for note 762640 for SRM 7.0,
Because the problem is:
If the position or the business partner of a user is assigned to a different organizational unit by drag and drop or by de-/assign in Transaction PPOMA_BBP, they become inconsistent because tables BUT050 and BUT052 are not adjusted.
Does anybody know about solving this problem ?

Hi,
In order to process the SC from Sourcing Cockpit, we should have the authorization for t-code BBPSOCO01 in our User roles.
So, you can chcek the z-roles in your system with this t-code authorization in SUIM and add to your profile.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sheetal.

Combination of GR/IR Control not allowed for External Services-SRM PO error

Hi All,
SRM 5.0 ECS R/3 4.6C
We have a service PO, for which an error Combination of GR/IR Control not allowed for External Services is being displayed.
The PO is in error in process at this moment. And is not in R/3
On SRM PO we have Confirm Performance of Service/Goods Receipt checked and Invoice Expected checked.
Confirmation-Related Invoice Verification is not checked. Any thoughts on this!!
Thanks
Krishna

Hi
<u>Please go through the following SAP OSS Notes -></u>
Note 725824 - MB5S: Error with purchase orders for external service
Note 781014 - Clearing values in purchase order currency are too high
Note 991800 - MB5S: Error in delivery costs (2)
Note 960789 - Wrong Values in MM Document for Service Based Invoice
Note 778562 - MM-IV: invoices are entered before the goods receipt
Note 578531 - Incorrect FM update for service purchase orders
Note 635864 - ME2S: Invoice value is calculated incorrectly
Note 570409 - Unplanned account assignment in invoice for service PO
Note 545684 - MIR4 for SRV: Incorrect data displayed if deletion indicator
Note 544567 - Transaction MIRO: incorr. default values at (parked) invoice
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Goods Movement Not allowed(XWAOK) check box - for SRM Reservations.

Dear Experts,
We are working on Extended Clasissc sceanrio however certain materails we are creating reservation switching from ECS to Classic Scenario. System is Creating Reservation successfully in backend but Goods movement reservation allowed (FIELD XWAOK) check box not checked only for SRM Reservations
Please note that ECC reservations checking this checkbox automatically based on Configuration. Is there any setting we have to do in SRM to pass the check box value to ECC? or How Can i check what data is passing from SRM to ECC......
Thanks
Ravi

Dear Ravi,
Could you please check if you have added the value '201' against the attribute movement type (forgot the attribute name) for the purchasing group or user group who created the shopping cart in SAP SRM. Once you have added the attribute, the problem should be resolved.
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan

Business System not reflecting the XI Content for SRM

Hi,
We are currently working on the SUS-MM scenario.
The landscape includes PI 7.11, SRM 7.0 and R/3 4.6C. SLD Communication is working fine between these systems.
Integration Builder has SRM Server 7.0 and SRM Server IC 7.0 imported.
The current status:
We can successfully transfer vendors from SAP R/3 to SUS
We cannot transfer transaction data from SAP R/3 to SUS, e.g. purchase orders etc
Our Main Issue:
The Business System INTEGRATION_SERVER_<SID> is imported into the Integration Builder from the SLD.
On the Display communication component screen, the receiver and Sender tabs are not showing any of the SRM Server or IC components that have been imported into the ESR. However is displaying only the BASIS components that was imported during inital install.
Because of this, we are not able to proceed with the configuration though the interfaces being available in the ESR. We are not sure what is that we are missing that is preventing the XI content for SRM from being displayed. Also, the PI business system in the SLD has the SRM Content listed under the installed products list.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
Venkat.

Hello,
do you have a solution? I'm facing the same issue.
Regards,
Sven

Acc *** Mandatory for Material + Material 200000060 not maintained by Purch

Dear Gurus,
I wanted to up the quantities for the following material in stocks: 200000060
I then went to TC- ME21N and the system came out with the following message:
Account assignment mandatory for material 200000060 (enter acc. ***.
Material 200000060 not maintained by Purchasing
Can anyone explain to me where to maintain this account assignment as there appear to have at least 2 fields in the Material Master Data with a similar name.
Also can you explain to me how to maintain this material in Purchasing please.
Kind regards
Chris

Hi,
You have not maintined purchasing view and account view 1 for this material for that particular plant for which you are making the P.O.
In the accounting view you have to enter the valuation class and price for the material and if this filled then it will not ask for account assignment while doing me21n.
Regards,
Raj.

Purchase org. field entry should not be Mandatory for PR creation/release

Dear Experts,
When we are creating PR (ME51N), Purchase organization field entry is mandatory for few user id & in few user id this field is not mandatory. While we are creating PR by which user id, where purchase org. field entry is not mandatory (not fill purchase org. field) & release PR (ME54N) than system ask purchase org no.
Purchase organization field entry should not be mandatory for us when we are creating & release the PR for all user ID's. How can be maintain this things on all user ID's.
Please help us regarding this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Shatrughan

Hi dear,
Do the following settings in SPRO,
SPRO->MATERIALS MANAGEMENT->PURCHASING->PURCHASE REQUISITION->DEFINE DOCUMENT TYPES.
Here check the Field selection Key for your document type.
Now go to
SPRO->MATERIALS MANAGEMENT->PURCHASING->PURCHASE REQUISITION->DEFINE SCREEN LAYOUT AT DOCUMENT LEVEL
Now double click on the field selection key which you have found earlier and now double click on Reference data,item and set the indocator as optional for Purchasing Organisation key.

Why passwd for CHAP must be the same while for PAP its not mandatory ?

Hi,
want to ask a question in WAN about PAP/CHAP.
why passwd for CHAP must be the same between routers while for PAP its not mandatory ?
regards

By default, much of this type of checking is performed for you. Read the available checks in {font:Courier}/usr/share/doc/pam-0.99.6.2/txts/README.pam_cracklib{font} and then decide if these are sufficient.
Note that some checks are not enabled by default, You can tune them by editing the {font:Courier}/etc/pam.d/system-auth{font} file:
# /bin/fgrep /etc/pam.d/system-auth
password requisite pam_cracklib.so try_first_pass retry=3and tinkering with the command line arguments there.

Confirmation against Backend PO for SRM@ERP2005

Hi,
I'm having a problem in posting confirmation for a B/E PO. I have received an error message in the inbox of the userid that I have used to carried out the confirmation which says 'Entry in outbound table not found'. I have clicked on the linked provided in the message and it brings me to one of the IDOC transactions. In it, I saw additional info such as Basic type MBGMCR01 and status which says Error in ALE service.
I have included message types BBPCO, BBPIV and ACLPAY in the Maintain Distribution Model and Distribute Views. I remember that there is an additional message type to be maintained called MBGMCR but the system doesn't allow me to maintain this value in that config as it says it's actually a BAPI. I have also tried adding this as a BAPI but the system prompted to enter other mandatory info such as method which I have no clue at all.
Appreciate if anyone can help me and points will be rewarded. Thanks.
Regards,
Li Ping

Yes , I did check it .
However , I dont think this works for SRM 7.0 extended classic scenario .
I have defined some custom fields in PO and want the values to be transferred to the backend PO .
Does this work with BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI ?
Regards,
Ambar

Business Content for SRM 5.0 in SP9

Hi All,
We have BI_CONT release 702 with Level 0005. But when I try to install the transformations or any new objects like DTP, I'm not able to find many of those in Business Contents. Are these objects not yet delivered with the standard content? Do anyone have any official information on this or any OSS Note? Any planned release dates?
Also any information on existing contnts for SRM 5.0
Thanks in advance
Amit

Hi,
But i know from the documentation of SRM 5.0 --> master Guide ---> It has been mentioned as follows
1) THE SRM 5.0 CONFIGURATION DOCUMENTATION IS DELIVERED WITH THE ST-ICO 150 CONTENT SHIPMENT FOR SOLUTION MANAGER
2) SOLUTION MANAGER CONTENT REPLACES THE BUSINESS SCENARIO CONFIGURATION GUIDES , WHICH WERE DELIVERED WITH EARLIER SRM SHIPMENTS
3) THE USE OF SOLUTION MANAGER IS MANDATORY FOR MYSAP SRM 5.0
4) if you have a look at the Master guide for SRM 5.0 ---> there is one seperate section available --->
1.2 Solution Manager ---> which gives more details of the solution manager and its content.
Edited by: khan voyalpad usman on Feb 12, 2008 7:49 PM

Fiori gateway deployment for SRM

Hi
Been trying to figure out how the gateway deployment for the SRM fiori apps should be.
All through the SAP help for Fiori I see that the SAP recommended method is a Central Deployment. And some other SAP docs say that the deployment is SRM independent
But I also see that for the SRM UI addon is a prereq for SRM Fiori and that the UI addon needs a local deployment of the gateway.
So does that mean for SRM Fiori we would need a local gateway instance.
So if I were to use ECC and SRM Fiori I would need two separate Gateway instances?
Can some one advice?
Thanks
Vishakh

Hi Masa
Thank you for your response
Understood. But SRMNXP is a prereq for SRM Fiori. And SRMNXP needs a local deployement. And Fiori reuses these gateway services.
So indirectly, logic would mean that I use the local deployment for the Fiori as well.
So the the choice between local and hub doesn't really hold good for SRM right?
If I were to say already have a hub deployment for ECC. And i need to start using the SRM Fiori apps.
a. Is there any way I can reuse the central deployment for the gateway or in other words what would be the best way or only way forward
b. If i were to have say only Approve shopping carts, i assume SRMNXP is not a pre req and hence I can use the central gateway and install the front end components on it?
c. If i were to use the other two apps I would need to have SRMNXP. In this case would I install the UI components locally or the central hub?
Hope the questions make sense. I cant really get around the fact that even though SRMNXP is mandatory for two of the apps and the SAP Help on Fiori says so.. there is no tip on how to handle a situation where someone would deploy both the ECC and SRM Fiori and how the gateway deployment would be then. Does it then make sense that you have a central hub solely for the ECC apps (unless we are using some other suite component that doesn't have a prereq like SRMNXP for SRM) ?
Thank you for the patient reading.

Need to make "opening date" mandatory in SRM RFx Header Screen

Dear All,
Working for SRM component "/SAPSRM/WDC_DODC_RFQ_H_BD" there is field "OPEN_DATE_TIME" which i need to make it mandatory .
There is standard config to do the same but its not happening through that is there any way I could do the same.
I have also tried to enhanced the application and made it mandatory in MODIFYVEW method and given the error message also but it allowed the RFx to get publised even tough the date is not entered.
Really appreciate the same if anyone has come across such requirement.
Thanks
Ankit Jain

In my system works fine, I've added the following code in badi BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI and I can't publish my RFX without filling that field...
DATA: ls_bid_header TYPE bbp_pds_bid_header_d,
        ls_messages TYPE LINE OF bbp_tmessages_badi.
IF flt_val EQ 'BUS2200'.
    CALL FUNCTION 'BBP_PD_BID_GETDETAIL'
      EXPORTING
        i_guid   = iv_doc_guid
      IMPORTING
        e_header = ls_bid_header.
    IF ls_bid_header-open_time IS INITIAL.
      CLEAR ls_messages.
      ls_messages-msgty = 'E'.
      ls_messages-msgid = 'ZYOUR_MESSAGE_CLASS'.
      ls_messages-msgno = 000.
      APPEND ls_messages TO et_messages.
    ENDIF.
ENDIF.

EP not mandatory for SRM 7.01?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for