EP server is veru slow

Hello,
We are having performance issue with EP 6.0 j2ee engine. The CPU utilization is very high.
I would like to find out which application is causing the issue.
Need your guidance how to find out which application is consuming more CPU (java administration guide)?
Background:
EP 6.0 (j2ee 640 )
Best Regards,
Vadi

Hi,
Check whether you have fine tuned your JVM as per SAP recommendations.
Use SAP note 723909.
Thanks & Regards,
Vijith

Similar Messages

  • Server is very slow

    Hi,
    My oracle R12 server is very slow. I mean to say that any query or request which I give takes long time to execute.
    How to tune it? any commends or procedure?

    Version:-
    Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.5 Beta (Tikanga)
    Top:-
    top - 18:02:07 up 5 days, 1:01, 4 users, load average: 0.10, 0.05, 0.01
    Tasks: 421 total, 1 running, 420 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
    Cpu(s): 0.2%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 99.8%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
    Mem: 8165024k total, 8116492k used, 48532k free, 256392k buffers
    Swap: 16386292k total, 338564k used, 16047728k free, 5176904k cached
    PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
    4516 testora 15 0 4298m 107m 99m S 1.7 1.3 0:00.56 oracle
    18412 testappl 16 0 875m 460m 6700 S 1.3 5.8 7:39.79 java
    4634 testora 15 0 4293m 27m 23m S 0.3 0.3 0:00.02 oracle
    1 root 15 0 10348 688 576 S 0.0 0.0 0:02.43 init
    2 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.02 migration/0
    3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/0
    4 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/0
    5 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.01 migration/1
    6 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/1
    7 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/1
    8 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/2
    9 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/2
    10 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/2
    11 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/3
    12 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 ksoftirqd/3
    13 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 watchdog/3
    14 root RT -5 0 0 0 S 0.0 0.0 0:00.00 migration/4
    Server load is very low.
    How to check background processes and kill them?

  • New iphone 6 with ios 8.0 crushed and didnt open again. call center told me that use itunes to update 8.0.2 but server is too slow and didnt let me download it. it stopts in the middle of the session. how can i download it from another link or server

    new iphone 6 with ios 8.0 crushed and didnt open again. call center told me that use itunes to update 8.0.2 but server is too slow and didnt let me download it. it stopts in the middle of the session. how can i download it from another link or server. by the way i try to dowload from turkey.

    anyone help me there? )=

  • Tomcat Server become very slow

    Hi all,
    I have a urgent problem which need you all help.... My tomcat server become very slow..i checked the CPU and memory usage are normal....and there are only about 10 users connect to server only....After i checked the log...i found that there are two error ..
    1. socket write error
    java.net.SocketException: Connection reset by peer: socket write error
    at java.net.SocketOutputStream.socketWrite(Native Method)
    at java.net.SocketOutputStream.write(SocketOutputStream.java:91)
    at org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer$OutputStreamOutputBuffer.doWrite(InternalOutputBuffer.java:652)
    at org.apache.coyote.http11.filters.IdentityOutputFilter.doWrite(IdentityOutputFilter.java:160)
    at org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalOutputBuffer.doWrite(InternalOutputBuffer.java:523)
    at org.apache.coyote.Response.doWrite(Response.java:513)
    at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.OutputBuffer.realWriteBytes(OutputBuffer.java:380)
    at org.apache.tomcat.util.buf.ByteChunk.flushBuffer(ByteChunk.java:360)
    at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.OutputBuffer.flush(OutputBuffer.java:344)
    at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.OutputBuffer.close(OutputBuffer.java:321)
    at org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteWriter.close(CoyoteWriter.java:115)
    at nextapp.echoservlet.WindowUI.service(WindowUI.java:203)
    at nextapp.echoservlet.Initializer.service(Initializer.java:175)
    at nextapp.echoservlet.Connection.process(Connection.java:541)
    at nextapp.echoservlet.EchoServer.process(EchoServer.java:303)
    at nextapp.echoservlet.EchoServer.doPost(EchoServer.java:223)
    2. java.sql.SQLException: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Transaction (Process ID 180) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.
    Which is the main causes to server slow down???.....How to solve this problem????

    The first message seems to indicate that a connection was made on the socket but closed prematurely. I get this often on my Tomcat installation when our corporate virus scanners kick in, probing network ports. I wouldn't worry about that one.
    The second one is indicating a deadlock on your database. I would say that your problem lies there.

  • Our Server is Very Slow

    Dear Experts,
    My Production Server is Very slow when we fire the report.
    So,
    1) I want to know which step Should I use to find out the problem.
    2) Tell me Please How to find out the Procedure /Query which is taking long OR using more server memory.
    3) How to Should I Check why Server is Slow?
    4) If My Server is Very Slow then what should I do first.

    Re: query is running slow i.e., like delete,insert

  • Messaging server is very slow

    our messaging server is very slow, and there is a message in the default log as follwing:
    Store Warning: Database snapshot aborted. Database in uncertain state.
    what's the problem, thank you.

    The last error message in default:
    [10/Jun/2005:12:17:50 +0800] jt-mail1 stored[22853]: Store Warning: Database snapshot aborted. Database in uncertain state.
    [10/Jun/2005:15:08:53 +0800] jt-mail1 stored[23779]: General Critical: Recovering database from snapshot. Run reconstruct -m soon after startup to resync redundant data
    The newest log:
    [11/Jun/2005:15:09:22 +0800] jt-mail1 stored[23779]: Store Warning: Database snapshot aborted. Database in uncertain state.
    [12/Jun/2005:07:37:19 +0800] jt-mail1 stored[28705]: General Critical: Recovering database from snapshot. Run reconstruct -m soon after startup to resync redundant data
    I have restart JES server just now,then the default log file say immediately:
    12/Jun/2005:07:37:19 +0800] jt-mail1 stored[28705]: General Critical: Recovering database from snapshot. Run reconstruct -m soon after startup to resync redundant data.

  • Snow Leopard Server running extremely slow all of a sudden!!

    Hi, I'm not a qualified server technician but am currently trying my best to run a server in a Secondary School! Please help, need to fix ASAP.
    So basically we've got a Mac Pro running Snow Leopard server which has become incredibly slow in the past week. Nothing has changed in our department to trigger this. Here's everything I know so far...
    - If I try to log on to the admin account when "Some Network Accounts Are Available", log on will take under a minute. If I try to log on to the admin account when the light goes green and "Network Accounts Are Available" log on will take forever and eventually just crash and which point I have to just force a shutdown and try again.
    - When I can log on, some aspects of the computing seems fast and other aspects are really slow. For example, a few programs open as soon as I log on no problem, however a simple spotlight search or trying to open Sytem Preferences will crash the computer completely.
    - Have tried booting in Safe Mode, and everything ran fast and how it's mean to but once restarting and booting normally the problems remained.
    Sorry for the lack of knowledge!!
    Thanks in advance.

    Your comment indicates "crash the computer"?  Do you mean that OS X Server itself fails, and you have to reboot?  Or that the application crashes, and you have to restart it?
    The following are some general approaches toward gathering some data:
    Launch Console.app from Applications > Utilities and see if there are blocks of repeating errors.
    Launch Terminal.app from Applications > Utilities and issue the following harmess, diagnostic command:
    sudo changeip -checkhostname
    After entering an administrative password and possibly seeing a one-time informational message about sudo, you should see some network configuration information and then an indication that no changes are required, or that there are DNS or network errors.
    Boot from the Snow Leopard installation DVD and run a volume verification pass using Disk Utility, this from the Utilities menu of the installation disl.
    FWIW...
    If the applications or OS X Server are crashing, then you're generally heard toward either a reinstallation of the software, or a hardware repair, or quite possibly a combination of the two.
    Forcing a hard shutdown can lead to corruptions, depending on exactly what's going on when the power drops out; that's probably best left as a last-resort approach and one best avoided.

  • File Server/AFP gets slow after a week or so

    Hi all,
    I manage a file server at our office here, with around 20-30 users, running 10.3.9 server. Users connect via AFP for general office duties, but also remote-desktop into a windows server using Rdesktop via X11. They use SMB to access their files from the windows side.
    I find after a week or so that logins to the shares, and general file access gets incredibly slow, and grinds to a halt eventually, but comes good after the server is rebooted.
    It is usually quick to authenticate in any case, but takes an age to bring up the list of shares that the users can pick from (probably 10-15 at most depending on their permissions). Even after a fresh reboot it takes about 10 seconds to bring up the list of shares to pick from. Is there any way to fix this?
    I find that is someone has their computer set to calculate folder sizes on a server drive/share it can make the server grind to a standstill, but even with everyone set up correctly it still goes slowly all by itself after a few days/weeks of running. Logging in via Remote Desktop becomes slow at this point too.
    I've tried some of the tips in this thread below with only limited success.
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=343979&tstart=15
    Any help is greatly appreciated

    As you upgraded the router's firmware,reset the router for 30 seconds and reconfigure the router from scratch.
    On the router setup page,Under the Wireless tab,click on the Advanced Wireless Settings...Change the Beacon Interval to 75, Change the Fragmentation Threshold to 2304,Change the RTS Threshold to 2307 and Click on Save Settings...

  • Server 2012 R2 slow performance over all

    This is a DELL PowerEdge R820 / 256GB RAM / 4TB onboard storage configured as Remote Desktop Services Host /TS... running QuickBooks, MS Office 2010 STD, Symantec EndPoint Protection (basic antivirus installation ONLY)... 1 month old server... SUPER fast,
    super powerfull.... Part of an AD in SBS 2008 Premium... single NIC card 4 ports / 3 ports disabled. single IP... no VLANS... server is able to resolve ANY pc, DNS record with no problems... able to resolve DC by name, able to receive GP, able to update, able
    to do everything that I can think of.... EXCEPT... anything I open, word, excel, QuickBooks, IE.... takes forever to open... after the application is open is fast but to open anything takes 3-4 minutes.... open ticket with Symantec all looks good, created
    lots of exceptions for antivirus/real time scanning, open ticket with QuickBooks: files look good application was removed and reinstalled to be sure all was done correctly... check the binding order for the disabled NIC; the active one is TOP option, no errors
    at all in event viewers for system, application, setup, no errors at all in DELL management tool, no hard drive errors, no controllers errors.... this server is replacing an old dell poweredge 2008 STD with 24GB RAM... the old DELL opens the same applications
    way faster than the new one... same Quicken version; old server opens Quicken in seconds, new one 3-4 minutes..... Real time monitoring NEVER goes above 1% for CPU and 3% for memory utilization.... one more thing... removed antivirus 100% restart... same performance
    without antivirus.....
    Any ideas will be great as of how to troubleshoot the slow performance....
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    As Sam suggested, please check if there any issue occurred in hard drive.
    On current situation, please also refer to following steps and troubleshoot, then check if we can find more
    clues.
    Please check if you have installed all necessary updates for the Windows Server 2012 R2.
    Please
    perform a clean boot to check if there has software conflicts.
    Please use Resource Monitor to troubleshoot and check if we can find some more details.
    Using Resource Monitor to Troubleshoot Windows Performance Issues Part 1
               Using
    Resource Monitor to Troubleshoot Windows Performance Issues Part 2
    If any update, please feel free to let me know.
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Justin Gu

  • Exchange 2013 with Outlook on RDS Server is extremely slow

    Exchange 2013 CU5 on Server 2012 R2 fresh install/new to domain; Outlook 2010 or 2013 on Remote Desktop server not in cached mode is slow to open, search and send messages with attachments.  Opening messages and opening attachments runs quickly.  
    My test mailbox has 300kb worth of mail in it and sending a message with a 5Mb attachment locks up Outlook for close to 1 minute and takes another 30 to 90 seconds to disappear from the outbox and and move to sent items.  This issue does not present
    itself in OWA.  My current testing RDS environment is a fresh install of Server 2008 R2 with Outlook 2013.  No additional add-ins or AV running on the Exchange server or the test RDS server.
    When cached mode is enabled, Outlook runs better as shown in Outlook 2010 (+ Exchange 2013) works extremely slow; however, I don't consider this an option because there isn't enough drive space on the RDS server to cache all of the user profiles.  
    Other Exchange environments - Outlook 2010 or 2013 in an RDS environment (non-cached) with Exchange 2007 or 2010 - don't show the same performance issues.  Moving within Outlook and sending large attachments runs quickly.
    I have checked Exchange throttling settings and monitored logs, but have not found cases where my test user is being throttled.  I have also looked at turning off IPv6 based on another post's suggestion; however, I have seen conflicting information
    about disabling IPv6 for Server 2012 R2, so I have not yet gone down this path.
    The Exchange server is a VM on a new VMware host and has assigned 8 cores from Intel Xeon E5-2640 procs and 16GB RAM; 1TB thick provisioned database volume on a RAID 5 array with 6 x 10k RPM SAS drives.  Disk queues are low on the Exchange server (in
    the .20 to .70 range).  My test RDS server is on the same VMware host on the same vSwitch.  Another test system is on a different system, but exhibiting the same behavior.

    Hi,
    How about the suggestion from Festivalman?
    Feel free to contact me if there is any update.
    Thanks
    Mavis
    If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Mavis Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange server 2010 sp2 slow issue

    My Exchange server 2010 sp2 performance very slow in morning time 9 to 10 AM and evening time 4 to 5 pm only and other time working fine

    Hello,
    Forums for Exchange versions prior to Exchange 2013 are over here:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/home?category=exchangeserverlegacy&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc
    Karl
    When you see answers and helpful posts, please click Vote As Helpful, Propose As Answer, and/or Mark As Answer.
    My Blog: Unlock PowerShell
    My Book: Windows PowerShell 2.0 Bible
    My E-mail: -join ('6F6C646B61726C40686F746D61696C2E636F6D'-split'(?<=\G.{2})'|%{if($_){[char][int]"0x$_"}})

  • SAP Server is very slow

    Hello Gurus,
    The central instance nn SAP productive system doesnu2019t seem to be responding.
    A lot of TIME_OUT runtime errors have occurred and still occuring.
    RFC's are on hold and system seems to be performing very very slow
    There are many work processes are in hold status 
    Thanks & Regards
    Shishir

    hello rohit
    An issue with the SAP Gateway which was running but not working correctly
    For that reason no RFC or any other outgoing connection was working
    Once we tried to restart the gateway the server, it crashed
    Please let me know what are the corrective action, and from where I can found the appropriate logs for the same.
    Thanks & Regards
    Shishir

  • Mail server is too slow to deliver the mail to internal domain

    Hi,
    My mail server faster enough to send the mails to other domains, but when i try to send mail to my own domain it too slow some time it take 30 t0 40 minutes to deliver the mail.
    Please help
    Thanks,
    Gulab Pasha

    You should use statspack to check what are the main waits.
    Some indicators to check :
    - too many fts/excessive IO => check sql statements (missing index, wrong where clause)
    - explain plan for most important queries : using cbo or rbo ? If cbo, statistics should be up to date. If rbo, check acces path.
    -excessive logfile switch (> 5 per hour) : increase logfile or disable logging
    - undo waits => not enough rollback segments (if you don't set AUM)
    - data waits => alter initrans, pctfree, pctused
    - too many chaining rows => rebuild set of datas or rebuild table
    - too many levels in indexes => rebuild index
    - excessive parsing : use bind variable or alter parameter cursor_sharing
    - too many sort on disks => increase sort_area_size and create others temporary tablespace on separate disks
    - too many blocks reads for a row => db_block_size too few or too many chaining rows
    - too many lru contention => increase latches
    - OS swapping/paging ?
    Too improve performance :
    - alter and tune some parameters : optimizer_mode, sort_area_size, shared_pool_size, optimizer_index_cost_adj, db_file_multiblock_read_count...
    - keep most useful packages in memory
    - gather regularly statistics (if using cbo)
    How do your users access to the db ?
    Jean-François Léguillier
    Consultant DBA

  • Server is too slow

    I have oracle 9i database on sun solaris OS
    IBM server.
    2GB RAM
    4 hard disk
    45 users are login in to the system.
    Its almost dead slow and some time user get out from the system.It is almost in hold sitution.
    When ever we restart the server all the process clear and works properly.After some time its started slow and performance got detoriate.
    gradualy its gets slow by the time and one point time it is dead slow and takes 30 min to commit transaction.which takes 20 sec at normal time.When i restart server it works normaly but gradually it gets slow again.
    please write some procedure to checkup
    database configuration is standard

    You should use statspack to check what are the main waits.
    Some indicators to check :
    - too many fts/excessive IO => check sql statements (missing index, wrong where clause)
    - explain plan for most important queries : using cbo or rbo ? If cbo, statistics should be up to date. If rbo, check acces path.
    -excessive logfile switch (> 5 per hour) : increase logfile or disable logging
    - undo waits => not enough rollback segments (if you don't set AUM)
    - data waits => alter initrans, pctfree, pctused
    - too many chaining rows => rebuild set of datas or rebuild table
    - too many levels in indexes => rebuild index
    - excessive parsing : use bind variable or alter parameter cursor_sharing
    - too many sort on disks => increase sort_area_size and create others temporary tablespace on separate disks
    - too many blocks reads for a row => db_block_size too few or too many chaining rows
    - too many lru contention => increase latches
    - OS swapping/paging ?
    Too improve performance :
    - alter and tune some parameters : optimizer_mode, sort_area_size, shared_pool_size, optimizer_index_cost_adj, db_file_multiblock_read_count...
    - keep most useful packages in memory
    - gather regularly statistics (if using cbo)
    How do your users access to the db ?
    Jean-François Léguillier
    Consultant DBA

  • SQL linked server twice as slow in Windows 7 as XP

    We have a transaction based synchronization from SQL Server to Oracle, i.e. both must commit or rollback in one distributed transaction. We achieved this using MSSQL Linked Server using the Oracle Provider for OLE DB and triggers running openquery for speed.
    The SQL Sever 2008 was on XP (doesn't need a server) and the Oracle 11g was on Red Hat 5EL. In testing from the first trigger firing to the last trigger finishing, a save test took ~11 Seconds, not perfect but acceptable. Yet when we moved to Windows 7 this time rose to 19 Seconds.
    We contacted Microsoft support and they seen to thing it is a multi platform issue. So to prove them wrong we created an oracle DB on a Windows 7 system and ran the tests again, same issue. They will not look into the issue without us paying for premium support at an hourly rate, due to the Oracle DB. So we created one more test environment to try to prove it was a Microsoft issue and not an Oracle driver issue we created 2 SQL servers and ran tests to see if we got the same issue. We got the following results, which seems to point the finger at the Oracle OLE Driver on Win 7:
    Windows XP sync to Windows 7:
    SQL Server to Oracle = ~8 seconds
    SQL Server to SQL Server = ~6.5 seconds
    Windows 7 sync to Windows 7:
    SQL Server to Oracle = ~19 seconds
    SQL Server to SQL Server = ~5.5 seconds
    Has anybody else found this issue and if so have they found a cause?
    We Have run NetMon and analysed the results and the packets seem to take twice as long in Win 7 as Win XP. This seemed to point to a network issue, but does not explain why 100% Microsoft is faster when synchronising Win 7 to Win 7, as opposed to Win XP to Win 7.
    I get the feeling the issue lies somewhere in the changes that were made by Microsoft in Vista in the networking protocols and configuration, causing a side affect in the OLE Driver. It could be that the driver works, but needs to be tuned with the new networking protocols from Microsoft.
    We have tried countless network settings, even the ones suggestions from MS Support made no difference at all.
    Edited by: 925129 on 03.04.2012 03:57
    Corrected a couple of types

    Hi Greg,
    Thanks for the answer, sorry for the late reply, I was away for Easter.
    What we have done is to alter the triggers to record their names, start and end times to an SQL Server table. I delete the contents of the table then run a test and run several queries to analyse the trigger data. the difference between the min start time and the max end time is how we get the total time. We run many queries over the data. I can send you the table DDL and some test run results DML, as well as, the queries I use to analyse the results.
    On top of this test we have run Microsoft's NetMon to analyse the network traffic and there it is clear that the packets take roughly twice as long in Win 7 as in Win XP, both in 32-bit and 64-bit OS versions. I know there has been some major network changes after Win XP and Microsoft are convinced this is an Oracle issue. The same OLE Driver is used for both Win 7 and Win XP OS's (excluding the one for 32-bit and one for 64-bit) and my guess is something needs to be tuned for the networking in Win 7. We have really tested this so much over the last 2 months and tried all kinds of network setting tuning in windows but nothing has worked at all.
    After creating an SQL DB to act in the place Oracle DB, the same issue was not present, so it really is a heterogeneous platform issue. In fact if the sync is SQL to SQL it is faster in Win 7 not slower.
    If you would like any of the results of our testing to see if you can spot the issue, you would be welcome.
    Guy
    Edited by: 925129 on 16-Apr-2012 05:40
    Edited by: 925129 on 16-Apr-2012 05:41

Maybe you are looking for