Error after transport:'Foriegn key generation error'

Hi ,
Iam getting the below error at transport in quality
Foreign key generation error for field 'ZZEVV_FR_KONX-KNUMH'
Thanks
Edited by: chidambar dixit on Jul 25, 2008 8:25 AM
Edited by: chidambar dixit on Jul 25, 2008 8:26 AM

HI,
Then check the error log carefully. Problem might be some else. If not try to reimport the transport with the help of BASIS.
Also check the status of check table in quality. Is it active?
All ur objects are in single TR? If not the u have to move check table TR first and then later objects TR.
If nothing works then include all the objects in another TR and transport. make sure all are active.
Thanks,
Vinod.

Similar Messages

Error after transport of Virtual Cube with Services

Hi All,
would any body can suggest me how we can change the source system assignment in QA or Production client for virtual Cube with Services.
A virtual cube is created with Services using the settings for RFC and using the logical source system. however after transporting the same to the QA system the Logical Source System has not changed and thus it is giving error " Error occured while determining target system for the logical system" would any body can suggest me how i can change the logical source system assignment in QA system for Virtual Cube with services.
Points would be rewarded appropriately.
Cheers
Noor

Hi Noor,
Check this link, it may help you.
Re: Transport issue - Source system does not exist
Regards,
Vijay G.

DTP error: Type conflict when calling FM - after transport to Prd

Hi ,
i have asset_attr datasource.it was working in my BW dev.
however after transport to BW prod. when i try to upload data using DTP it gives me an Abrupt error
"0ASSET_ATTR IPDCLNT030 : Type conflict when calling a function module (fiel
Message no. RSDS666"
no more information is given, & the request ends in red.
This is first time i'm using this Infoobject upload.
however all my other transaction data & other master data all are getting uploaded fine.
even Asset_text datasource is working fine.
Did anyone face similiar probs ?
can anyone guide me on this error ?
thanks
ramesh

Hi
Take a look at note 1130907.
Regards,
Chandu.

BPM error after transport

hi all,
i get the following error after transport on Q system:
"No object type found for this message; check the activation of the corresponding process"
the trace gives me this explanation:
"could not create BPE proxy for message, no XML object definition found for message 48C56A8CD7D615EEE10000000A9E014F"
In SXI_CACHE the business process has status zero, business process and everythng else in transport is active.
So what else can i do to fix that bug?
Thanks
Stefan

HI,
Then check the error log carefully. Problem might be some else. If not try to reimport the transport with the help of BASIS.
Also check the status of check table in quality. Is it active?
All ur objects are in single TR? If not the u have to move check table TR first and then later objects TR.
If nothing works then include all the objects in another TR and transport. make sure all are active.
Thanks,
Vinod.

Unable to find resource error after transport

Hello,
there is a strange error happening with some mapping after transporting the content of some namespaces from Dev to Q using file (client) export import.
We already tried the scenario successul on Q, but after some reimports of changes (which still work on Dev) we get the following error in the "request message mapping" step:
"RESOURCE_NOT_FOUIND"
Unable to find resource .............. in the following software component versions: ........
However the mapping is there and can be tested. Any idea on this?

But last time one day later the scenario was running fine. Could that really be a problem with cache update?
If all the required objects are present in the QA environment and are active....then yes it can be a problem with the Cache.
I hope that no error was encountered (or import was done properly) during the import/ reimport.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Runtime Error 9 on WAD after transports

Hi Experts,
I am << Run time error : 9 Subscript out of Range >> and it throws me out of WAD.
This is happening only in QA after the transports, but Dev is working fine.
I have checked the notes and steps suggested in the previous discussions but none of it is helped.
Please if any one has dealt with this error before and resolved it please help.
Thanks
Sarah

This is the only web template in QA and this was the first transport for the template.
I am unable to even get what the error actually is to debug it further other than the message.
I still continue to get the error even after re-import infact even Dev web tempplate also gives the same error after transport.
If anyone has had this error before please suggest.
Thanks
Sarah
Message was edited by: Sarah

On-board RSA key generation on Cyberflex Access 64K V2 / Memory leak?

The description of the Cyberflex Access 64K V2 card states that "On-board key generation RSA up to 2048 bit" (http://www.youcard.de/datenblaetter/chipkarten/DS%20Cyberflex_Access.pdf). So I assume that this implicates that it should somehow be able to instantiate a KeyPair object on which genKeyPair() can be called.
When I first tried to instantiate an Object either by using KeyBuilder.buildKey or KeyPair I just received an 0x6F00 error. After removing all of the other objects that were also instantiated I was able to create one Key object using KeyBuilder (RSAPrivateKey or RSAPublicKey). However, as soon as I tried to instantiate two Key objects at the same time I just received the 0x6F00 error again.
I create these objects by using:
private static RSAPublicKey pubKey;
private static RSAPrivateCrtKey privKey;
protected Foo() {
    pubKey = (RSAPublicKey) KeyBuilder.buildKey(KeyBuilder.TYPE_RSA_PUBLIC, KeyBuilder.LENGTH_RSA_1024, true);
    privKey = (RSAPrivateCrtKey) KeyBuilder.buildKey(KeyBuilder.TYPE_RSA_CRT_PRIVATE, KeyBuilder.LENGTH_RSA_1024, true);
    register();
}So it seems that there is not enough free (EEPROM) memory for both objects. Is this a known problem with the Cyberflex cards? Is there some workaround? Could it be possible that some former test-applets that I've used (and already deleted) on the card leaked some memory that is missing now?

I think that I've just found the problem. The value of "-nvDataLimit" in the install APDU that I've sent via gpshell was too low. It seems to work with a higher value.

Transportation lane KEY not getting generated in the table

Transportation lane KEY not getting generated in the table
Hi folks,
The issue is like this :
We have a weekly workorders upload program from legacy systems to SAP-APO. The legacy planners send a .CSV file containing material-wise workroders. A customised zee program picks these quantities & writes them in Prod.planned keyfigures in SNP planning book. This process is done for the manufacturing locations only.
Lately workorders for two particular material M1 & M2 had failed to get upload. It gives the error 'NO VALID SOURCE OF SUPPLY COULD BE FOUND' in its Job log. We did some debugging & found that for successful materials the TRPID is getting generated in the table /SAPAPO/V_TRPROD whereas this TRPID is missing for M1 & M2. Why this is happening is our main concern. We tried deleting the PPM & creating this again, assuming that the PPMID is the precursor for generating this TRPID, but this yielded no results.
____ for successful upload______________
se16 --> /SAPAPO/V_TRPROD
Version = 000
LOCTO = LOCID KEY for manufacturing location
MATID = MATID KEY of successfully loaded workorder
Enter
This gives the following results
TRPID = TRPID KEY
LOCFR = LOCID KEY for manufacturing location
LOCTO = LOCID KEY for manufacturing location
MATID = MATID KEY for successfully loaded workorder
( This seems a self-lane, i.e both TO & FROM location are same)
____ for unsuccessful upload________
se16 --> /SAPAPO/V_TRPROD
Version = 000
LOCTO = LOCID KEY for manufacturing location
MATID = MATID KEY for unsuccessfully loaded workorder
Enter
This gives the following results
Error = No Table entries found for specified KEYS
We are perplexed why this TRPID is not getting generated for these two particular material M1 & M2?
We have deleted their PPM & re-created them to cross-check if the PPMID KEY is the trigger for generating the TRPID key. This didn't work!
Please let us know in case someone faced a similar issue.
Many Thanks.
Kumar
Edited by: Blue Lotus on Jun 9, 2011 2:44 PM

Yes Anand.
We deleted the PPM & created it again, which didn't work.
Later on we deleted the product itself from APO & re-CIFed it from R3 & then re-created the PPM.
The PPMID which was missing earlier is now getting created! However no luck with the TRPID.
Why this TRPID is not getting generated in our only concern
Regards
Kumar

Issue with migrated transformation rule after transport

Hello all,
We have migrated couple of update rules and transfer rules to transformation rules. All the transformation rules are active in development environment.
The issue is when we transport these transformation rules to QA, one of the fields of datapacket dimension "RECORD" becomes &R1& in the global structure of start routine and therefore, transport fails in QA. Along with this we had another issue that if we add any additional fields in the cube or ODS structure, the global structure in start routine doesn't change after transport in QA. Basically, it seems like it doesn't do anything when we do transport.
We tried couple of things by transporting entire flow inclding target and source objects, we also tried transporting only transformation with overwrite mode. But none of the things worked. We also have logged the message with SAP.
SAP suggested us to open the QA environment and perform the change manually. We did it and obviously we could activate the transformation rules. But when we tried to re-transport the transformation, it is keep failing with the error "Syntax Error". My assumption has after the transport, the field has become &R1& again.
Has anybody faced such issue? We are on Ehp1 SP7.
- Danny

Thanks Murali,
Yes as I mentioned SAP suggested us to open the box and do it manually, but once we are done with the manual changes, we tried transporting the same transformation rule again, which I guess going to be the case in case of any future enhancement. Transport failed and it says "Syntax Error".
The transformations we activated manually in the target system are active, but when we try to load the data, it throws the exception error.
Any clue ?? Is it working fine in your system after you did manual changes? Did all future transport go well ?
- Danny

Hierarchy Analysis Authorization does not work after transport

Hi Gurus,
I am facing a issue in hierarchy analysis authorization in quality system but the same authorization works perfectly fine in development.
All hierarchy authorizations works in Quality except for this one. I found one old sap note describing this as program error but this note is not applicable in BW 7.3.
I have checked the table RSECVAL, RSECHIER and authorization is active so everything looks good. Please advise if anyone faced this issue after transporting hierarchy auths to other systems
Regards,
Salman

Salman,
What I understood from your description is that you have same role+AA in Dev and QA, which provides access in Dev for all the nodes for said hierarchy but in QA, same role+AA provides access to the same hierarchy for all the nodes but one. Try to create a ZTEST analysis authorization in QA itself with access for the problematic hierarchy node and see if it works ? This will rule out the case if there is a difference in hierarchy in DEV & QA.
Regards,
Shivraj Singh

Overhead calculation not happening after using Overhead key and orgin group

overhead calculation not happening after using Overhead key and orgin group.
There was a runtime error earlier related to u201Cdefine credit u201C IMG node under costing sheet component and we have applied SAP note 769946 and that error was gone out of the way
We want to apply/add Overhead to SFG/FG materials.
We are using PP order with PCC(product cost collector) as the cost object , i.e costing by period.(system ECC 6)
But our problem is with material standard cost estimate process.
We have assigned overhead keys to the percentage rates in costing sheet for material standard costing and assigned the origin groups to the credits of costing sheet. But after running the cost estimate overhead is not taking into account for standard cost calculation.
In the define credit entry table key field is valid to date strangly and actually system should allow one than one entry with same valid to date and same sec.Cost element(type-41) for different cost centers.
But if we without using overhead key and origin group, the entire cost in that supporting cost center will come to all materials (SFG/FG) and we can not distinguish between different product materials(SFG /FG).
We have checked all things as mentined below.
Firstly that the correct costing sheet is assigned to the valuation
variant.
That the costing sheet is entered for the appropriate material type:
Finished and semi finished or material components.
All of the above can be checked and verified via transaction OKKN.
In addition make sure that the base value maintained is present in the
costing, for example the base may include an Origin group, is that
origin group part of the materials being costed?
Similarly if the base is found and values exist how is the overhead
rate of the costing sheet set up, is it valid etc.
And finally do a similar check for the credit.
we doubt this as a programm error...
So, request all experts to have ur feedback..

Dear,
Check your origin group & material unit of mesaurement is same.
some time in costing sheet origin group is maintain in different unit & for materail it's maitain in other unit of mesaurement.
You can see unit of measure for material in Additional data - unit of measure.
Check BOM component material unit also.
Check same unit of measure is maintain in KZS2
I hope above will useful.
GOPAN

Web template with HTML framset not working after transport

Hi,
I've built a frameset which consists of two web-templates (role-menu and content area) those two are combined together using plain HTML which does not acontain any web items (uploaded via WAD). This works fine in development. After transporting to our QA environment all the templates have been transported with concode 0, but the frameset does not get loaded. I always get an "Error loading template ...". The two templates which contain web items work fine when used stand-alone.
When looking in transport connection I see the following message:
"Object ZWF_WEB_FRAMESET (Web Template Name) could not be collected for object ()"
I also see the same behavior on another transport of a template. Nine out of ten ar fine, but one, all are exact copies - only the query used is different, does not work either. The query that is used has been transported and is working.
Has anybody an idea what could cause this?
Is there a way to regenerate templates (like RSRT for queries) ?
Thanks in advance
Bernd Dümmel
KODAK Stuttgart
using ve created a

Did you upload the video?
Did you provide the correct path to your HTML object?

Primary key generation: Using CounterHome?

I can't find any documentation that talks about automatic primary key generation support on OC4J. I noticed the article on the Orion Support page that mentions their "Counter" bean. Is this the extent of support for automatic primary key generation in OC4J? When I searched for this class in the distribution, I only found it in a demo application in JDeveloper.
Is this something that is handled directly in the Oracle DB, which is why OC4J doesn't bother to support it?

Sorry I wasn't specific. By "going nowhere", I meant it went to an error page on the orion site. I don't know why it couldn't find it, because when I just now searched for the article with the title you just gave, the resulting URL was identical to what you gave me originally.
As to the "counter faq", I think I've seen that before, but I can't get to it right now (server overloaded or something). The one problem I remember with trying to pursue the "counter" solution was somewhat simple. I couldn't find the code. I didn't notice a download for the "Counter" class, and I can't find it in either the jdeveloper or oc4j distributions.
In any case, I ended up implementing the UUID solution, based on Floyd Marinescu's example in "EJB Design Patterns". I think this will work fine for our application.
I'd still like to know more about Orion's "Counter" solution, if there's any real code available to see.

Infospoke inactive after transport

Experts,
In version 3.5, I have created an infospoke with transformation and unit tested in Dev box. After transport I have got an error 8 while importing in QA. I checked all objects if anything missing or inactive in dev box related with this transport. But could not find anything.
Looking into QA, I noticed infospoke was in revised version. Do you have any suggestions about what could be missing in transport? Or what should be the next possible steps to resolve the issue, please. Thanks.
Regards,
Nimesh
Message was edited by:
Nimesh Patel

Hi Anil, I am having the same problem. My ABAP routine puts the correct selection variables, but the infospoke is getting into 'Revised' version. Can you please let me know, if you have a fix for this?
Thanks,
Naveen

Problem with theme service after transport to QAS

Hi,
when i click the link on BSP page inside portal, iam getting following error. the link is working outside portal.
its working on dev r/3 and portal. i got the problem after transport of the package to QAS, i checked all the services and alla are active.
http://XXXXXXX:7035/irj/portalapps/com.sap.portal.design.portaldesigndata/themes/portal/main_theme/controls call was terminated because the corresponding service is not available.
Theme is active and its applied for every user, i have 30 BSP pages in portal and only this page is showing this error, this page will be launched as popup from portal.
Thanks in Advance,
Damodhar.

SQL> exec dbms_xdb.sethttpport(8080);
BEGIN dbms_xdb.sethttpport(8080); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PLS-00201: identifier 'DBMS_XDB' must be declared
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
another one...........

Error after transport:'Foriegn key generation error'

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for