Error BORGR 027 and 093 on DESADV Idoc

Hi experts, I have a problem wit the Idoc for message type DESADV.
I get errors BORGR 027 and 093 (status 51) on ibound Idoc.
It seems that something in the delivery is missing, cause it seems to look for a PO with POSNR 00000, and clearly can't find it.
Similarly it seems impossible to get a supplier.
Segment E1EDL24 is red-colored, as if an information is missing.
Function modue is BORES_IDOC_INPUT_DESADV1.
We are running release 4.6C.
Thanks for your kind help!!
GR

Hi,
   Reprocess the idoc with "RBDMANI2" and get the exact error text.

Similar Messages

  • Idoc error mapping error for segment "E1EDT13 006" in DESADV idoc

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    DESADV IDOC for few articles is not getting passed from SAP to legacy system. It is missing one segment"E1EDT13 006" for goods issue.
    Why is this mapping error happening. How can this be resolved.
    Regards.
    Sumi

    Hi Nsangle/SAP gurus,
    Thanks for  that. But, I have already compared the failing idoc with the successful one. It's the segment E1EDT13 006 missing in the wrong idoc. I have already added that idoc and reprocessed it.
    But, I wanted to know why such kind of idoc segment missing/ mapping error happens.
    Regards.
    Sumi

  • Getting Error in SM58 and IDX2 while using IDOC from

    Dear All,
    Getting error when trying to send FIDCCP02 Idoc from ECC to PI system.
    "Basic Type 'FIDCCP02' is unknown"
    Getting the same error while trying to import metadata using IDX2 from PI side.
    All connections and distribution model are created.
    Please help
    Regards

    hey,
    I checked all config again but getting error while checking ocnsistency in BDM5 on ECC system(E1Q).
    It is failing when the messge type FIDCC1 reaches PI QA (X1Q) system and the error states
    Message type FIDCC1 is not defined
    Please check last line of below message:
    E1QCLNT001     Checks in own system E1QCLNT001          
         Message type     @08\QCheck OK@     Message type FIDCC1 is defined
         Segment filtering     @08\QCheck OK@     No segment filtering
         Conversions     @08\QCheck OK@     No conversion
         Partner profile     @08\QCheck OK@     Partner profile has been created
                                      @08\QCheck OK@     .....Port PI_QA
              @08\QCheck OK@     .....Port PI_QA
              @08\QCheck OK@     .....Packet size 0001
              @08\QCheck OK@     .....Basis type FIDCCP02
              @08\QCheck OK@     .....enhancement
         Port     @08\QCheck OK@     Port PI_QA : To PI Quality System
              @08\QCheck OK@     .....Port type: Transactional RFC
              @08\QCheck OK@     .....port version 3: IDoc record types from Version 4.0 onwards
              @08\QCheck OK@     .....Logical address (destination) X1QCLNT001
         Logical address (destination)     @08\QCheck OK@     Logical address (destination) X1QCLNT001 is defined
    X1QCLNT001     Checks in partner system X1QCLNT001          
         Check of own logical system     @08\QCheck OK@     Own logical system is X1QCLNT001
              @08\QCheck OK@     Logical system is the same as the target address
                       Message Type     *@0A\QCheck resulted in error@*     Message type FIDCC1 is not defined
    When I am clicking on error it is taking to WE81 on PI side.
    So do I need to add this message type in PI system as it is present in ECC side?
    Thanks
    Edited by: Chanakya Sharma on Dec 10, 2010 12:10 PM

  • Error when ECO and BOM creation using IDoc

    Hi experts,
    now i am doing an interface about ECO/BOM creation and changing using IDoc.The idoc type is ECMMAS02 ans BOMMAT04.
    since i know a little about ECO/BOM, can anyone provide some good materials for me?
    and i don't know which fields are mandatory in idoc segment, so i go to tansaction BD30 to run a BOM changing. i input a change number but the idoc log shows that change number does not exist. what is the change number using? where i can implement the changes, e.g, change the quantity? should the change number be used when creation and changing? how can i get this change number?
    thanks a lot in advance!

    Hi experts,
    now i am doing an interface about ECO/BOM creation and changing using IDoc.The idoc type is ECMMAS02 ans BOMMAT04.
    since i know a little about ECO/BOM, can anyone provide some good materials for me?
    and i don't know which fields are mandatory in idoc segment, so i go to tansaction BD30 to run a BOM changing. i input a change number but the idoc log shows that change number does not exist. what is the change number using? where i can implement the changes, e.g, change the quantity? should the change number be used when creation and changing? how can i get this change number?
    thanks a lot in advance!

  • JDBC to IDoc ( error when mapping multiple JDBC records to IDoc)

    Hi,
    I am working on JDBC to IDoc scenario, I have declared row as 0 to unbounded and by default the IDoc structure is 1..1.
    Inorder to map multiple rows from JDBC to get multiple IDoc's, I have changed the occurrence of IDoc in "Messages" tab of Message mapping to 0 to unbounded.
    I have mapped "row" to "IDoc".
    When I test the mapping, it works fine, giving the same number of IDoc's with that of row.
    When I test end to end, in SXMB_MONI, it gives me following error:
    <SAP:Code area="IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_IDOC_RUNTIME</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>MSGGUID 54A3A64E895D48EC3F20C69FEFE2E82B: Tag found instead of tag IDOC BEGIN=</SAP:P1>
    can any one help me out with this.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Jwalith,
    Check this blog from Michel
    The specified item was not found.
    Make sure that you changed occurance as per this blog.
    hope this is helpful
    regards,
    Venkat.

  • Error in number range while testing inbound idoc via we19

    hi all,
    i have done all configurations but while testing the inbound idoc via we19 i am getting an error 'error in assigning number to idoc'..i checked and found that the number range object for idoc is edidoc in it number interval is defined from 1 to 99
    i dont think that anything is wrong with the number object..
    Can u tell me how dow i eliminate this error?

    Increase Higher limit the reason is when you look at current idoc number ( This idoc number already exists ) ,it will not create new idoc number.
    System will get the number from SNRO Based on IDOC Object.
    Just look at EDIDC and see the current idoc number.
    Simple example :
    I have one number - 100 ,it is already exists in database,if i insert same record to the database ,did system will accept ?
    Thanks
    Seshu

  • Auxiliary Packaging missing from DESADV IDOC

    Hi Experts,
    I have a delivery attached to a shipment, when the output for the shipment triggers an outbound DESADV IDOC, the segment E1EDP08 and E1EDP06 contain normal packaging material information, BUT Auxiliary packaging material information (which do not have a handling unit number) is missing.
    How to get this aux pack info into E1EDP08 and E1EDP06 segments of DESADV IDOC? any configuration, user exit, coding?
    maximum points would be rewarded, if the solution is helpful.
    Br,
    Ankur

    I have checked these field available in DESADV original message in WE19 transaction.You need to add in Functional module program if the packing material has AUXilary packing then system should populate these fiels.Check why the current program it is not populating?.If the logic is not written in existing program then you need to modify the code.

  • Most common BW data load errors in production and how to solve them ..

    Hi All,
    Most common BW data load errors in production and how to solve them ..
    Any doc on it ,if so plz send it across to this id [email protected]
    Thanks in advance.
    Rgrds
    shoba

    hi
    1) RFC connection lost.
    2) Invalid characters while loading.
    3) ALEREMOTE user is locked.
    4) Lower case letters not allowed.
    5) While loading the data i am getting messeage that 'Record
    the field mentioned in the errror message is not mapped to any infoboject in the transfer rule.
    6) object locked.
    7) "Non-updated Idocs found in Source System".
    8) While loading master data, one of the datapackage has a red light error message:
    Master data/text of characteristic 'so and so' already deleted .
    9) extraction job aborted in r3
    10) request couldnt be activated because theres another request in the psa with a smaller sid
    11) repeat of last delta not possible
    12) datasource not replicated
    13) datasource/transfer structure not active ´
    14) Idoc Or Trfc Error
    15. ODS Activation Error

  • DESADV idoc

    Hello,
    I have a question regarding DESADV idoc.
    DESADV idoc creates and inbound delivery.
    We have this problem : we need to create our inbound delivery right after the PO creation.
    Do you know if the DESADV idoc can update an existing inbound delivery ?
    Thanks,
    Regards,
    PYR

    how can system up date the same inbound delivery in different PO ............as inbound delivery is created with reference to the PO and it gets updated automatically in the PO.
    If you want the DESDAV should update the PO right after the creation of the PO then  its possible but you need to write a Z program for that  because DESDAV means vendor has informed you that he has shipped the goods and the thing is that if the PO is created then at any point of time DEDAV can update the confirmation in PO.
    If you want that the moment you save PO system should trigger the DESDAV then i have some question
    1. for what quantity system should update the PO thru DESDAV
    2. from where will the DEDAV would be getting all the required information

  • Inbound processing of segment E1EDT13 - QUALF 499 in DESADV idoc

    Dear all,
    we are currently facing the problem, that we want to send customized deadline dates in a DESADV idoc into our system.
    I set up the customizing accordingly, maintained the data in a outbound delivery and created an idoc out of it. I saw, that the segment E1EDT13 is filled using QUALF 499.
    I took this idoc modified a few fields and sent it back as an inbound delivery.
    This works, but E1EDT13 with qualifier 499 doesn't appear in the created inbound delivery.
    I checked the coding of the inbound function modules concerning qualifier 499 and detected, that this qualifier is never considered in the coding.
    Does SAP support the inbound posting of qualifier 499? If yes, how? Which function module will be used?
    If no, does anyone have an idea/experience concerning inbound DESADV using qualifier 499 in segment E1EDT13?
    Kind regards
    Harry
    PS: We are using a ECC 6.0 release.

    Posted the wrong idoc type. Sorry
    Moderator Message: I will lock this thread, just in case someone feels tempted to answer it :-). Next time please use the EDIT option to edit your post.
    Edited by: kishan P on Nov 4, 2010 5:53 PM

  • Desadv idoc processing issue

    Hi All,
      We are facing issue, when vendor send a two desadv idoc for packing delivery.
    First idoc correctly pack the delivery and change the packing status to completely packed.
    Processing second Idoc get fails but create a dummy handling unit. It delete one handling unit from the handling unit table VEKP but the trace remains in document flow table VBFA.
    This does not happen in all the cases and we are not able to reproduce in Quality system to debug.
    Does anybody faced the same issue earlier, and what could be the possible root cause and solution for this.
    Please help.
    Thanks in Advance
    Ankit Gupta

    Hi,
    As you have mentioned that you are using custom defined iDoc, you might be using a custom defined BAPI to receive the data from the iDoc.
    As you have said that the status is 64, your iDoc has entered the system & it has failed only when the data being sent to the application.
    kindly, check if the custom defined BAPI or RFC is working fine & whether it updates the status record or not? because you custom BAPI will be receiving the data from the iDoc.
    Also, test the scenario using the transaction WE19.
    or else you can use manual processing of iDoc using T.code - BD87.
    kind regards,
    Thangesh

  • ASN user exit, before posting DESADV IDOC.

    Hi
    I have a requirement to compare the sales order quantity and delivery quantity before posting the outbound DESADV IDOC to the external system. Can anyone tell me which use exit to be used.
    If there is no exit, can anyone please tell me the alternative way to achieve the same functionality.
    Regards
    Rinku

    If you use NW 7.0, you may use an implicit enhancement option at the end of the FM, to set status 68 (it's an export parameter)
    Otherwise, create your own FM which calls idoc_input_delvry, and set status 68 in your FM. You must customize transaction WE57 to call your FM instead of idoc_input_delvry.

  • 2TB Ext. Hard Drive is corrupted?, error code -50 and then error code -35 when i try to empty out my trash

    okay so a few days ago i received and email for one of my colleagues to do some final editing to a music video. the folder contained 2 videos a rough chops and the main which was about 2-3GB which i dragged on to my external hard drive . and at the time i was trying to install a trial version of parallel lines and me being a newbie to the software i didn't know i need windows installments for it to run lol but yeah... so i was just getting frustrated with the software i kept installing it uninstalling it and then i was thinking my the problem might be because my MacHD space is low (less then 40GBs on my MacHD), so.. i installed it on my hard drive where all my important files are (I'm a graphic designer and do light video editing) video projects and many photoshop projects form 2007 and logs and just a bunch of important files in my hard drive. so because i was so frustrated with the software i wasn't thinking and i installed it on my external 2TB hard drive. and when i realized parallel wasn't working i gave up, uninstalled the program form the hard drive and for some reason when i did that and i tried opening the video my friend had email to me and for some reason it did load up but a few seconds maybe about 10sec in the video is froze and closed my media app (VLC) and when i tried opening other video files it would freeze every few minutes but those specific files i had drag in last were not playing after at least 5 secs and eventually didn't open at all so i restart my computer login and now i get scared i see that my MacBook Pro isn't reading my external hard drive so i search threw forums... i unplug from the wall plug my external hard drive back in my computer and it loaded up but when i opened my external hard drive all my files had that plank white paper icon on my folders (because i have everything organized but subject when you open then drive folder. so... i go in to my projects and nothing, i open my edited photos and nothing... my hart feels like its about to drop and i keep opening files and there is nothing in them, but in "get info" of my drive it shows that there is filled so i go to "disk utility"... i "verify disk" passes ..."repair disk" doesn't past.... i look it up in forums... so i reboot my computer and go to the safe recovery menu. go threw the same ting "disk utility"... verify, pass... repair, pass... so now i feel relieved. i login files in the ext. hard drive load up i tried again to open the files and same thing happens... so now I'm thinking its the files i drag the files to the trash and try to empty and its gone i reboot the computer and my drive didn't load up so i tried unplugin it and back in... drive comes up i notice theres trash.. i tried emptying it and i get the error code -50. and no files are popping up on my external drive and i try to repair/unmount disk and the verify disk doesn't pass and when i click repair disk it doesn't past and another error code pops up -35.... so i felt my drive alone for a few days and yesterday i go the files deleted from the trash and now I'm not getting any codes but when i try to unmount.verify/repair the disk. keeps letting my tits need to be repaired so i click the repair button another error unable to unmount volume to repair...
    what do i do? my files still don't show up. and I'm very sorry for the long paragraph but i have to be detailed for you to understand my situation

    Read this.

  • Test-OutlookConnectivity WARNING: An unexpected error has occurred and a Watson dump is being generated: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

    Hi All,
    When we do a test-outlookconnectivity -protocol:http the result is a success but then we get the following:
    ClientAccessServer   ServiceEndpoint                               Scenario                           
    Result  Latency
    (MS)
    xxxxxxxxxxxx... xxxxxxxxxxxxxx                 Autodiscover: Web service request.  Success   46.80
    WARNING: An unexpected error has occurred and a Watson dump is being generated: Object reference not set to an instance
     of an object.
    Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
        + CategoryInfo          : NotSpecified: (:) [Test-OutlookConnectivity], NullReferenceException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : System.NullReferenceException,Microsoft.Exchange.Monitoring.TestOutlookConnectivityTask
    So it looks like it's not completing successfully.
    I can't find anything on this in particular, and don't really know how to go about solving it - We are fully up to date, Exchange 2010 Sp2 with Rollup 5-v2
    Any help appreciated!

    hi,
    I have the same issue also on Exchange 2010 SP2 RU5v2
    I ran your command and get the below
    [PS] C:\Installs\report\Activesync>Test-OutlookConnectivity -Protocol:http |FL
    RunspaceId                  : ebd2c626-1634-40ad-a17e-c9a713d1a62b
    ServiceEndpoint             : autodiscover.domain.com
    Id                          : Autodiscover
    ClientAccessServer          : CAS01.domain.com
    Scenario                    : Autodiscover: Web service request.
    ScenarioDescription         :
    PerformanceCounterName      :
    Result                      : Success
    Error                       :
    UserName                    : Gazpromuk.intra\extest_645e41faa55f4
    StartTime                   : 8/21/2013 4:08:50 PM
    Latency                     : 00:00:00.1250048
    EventType                   : Success
    LatencyInMillisecondsString : 125.00
    Identity                    :
    IsValid                     : True
    WARNING: An unexpected error has occurred and a Watson dump is being generated: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
    Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
        + CategoryInfo          : NotSpecified: (:) [Test-OutlookConnectivity], NullReferenceException
        + FullyQualifiedErrorId : System.NullReferenceException,Microsoft.Exchange.Monitoring.TestOutlookConnectivityTask
     Any help would be greatly appreciated, I also get random failures of OWA, EAS and web services, very frustrating
    I have no errors in the app event log
    thanks
    Faisal Saleem Windows Systems Analyst 07595781867

  • Error while uninstalling and then re installing sharepoint 2013 on same server(windows server 2012)

    Hi All,
    I have installed SharePoint 2013 prerequisites successfully on windows server 2012. While installing SharePoint 2013, system struck on for several minutes. I have restart my system manually. Later I then installed prerequisites which showed a successful
    lessage. But When I try to install SharePoint 2013. I am getting the following error:
    trial editions and lincensed editions of SharePoint, Project Server, and Office Web apps products may not be installed on the same server.
    I am unable to find solution for this issue. what is the solution for this?
    Thanks in Advance..
    Prem Kumar

    To be honest, the quickest thing you could do (and what I would do regardless) is re-build the server (re-install Windows).
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Maybe you are looking for