Error during upgrade from sap R3 4.7 ext 110 to ERP6 EHP4

Dear all
we doing an upgrade in test server to ERP6 with EHP4,source release is sap Entreprise 4.7 110.We have copied all the required DVDs to the server .During the configuration phase while giving the EHP package we got the error.
EHP_INCLUSION.log details
4 ETQ233 Calling function module "SPDA_PREPARE_PATCH" by RFC
4 ETQ234 Call of function module "SPDA_PREPARE_PATCH" by RFC succeeded
4 ETQ239 Logging off from SAP system
4 ETQ010 Date & Time: 20100915210509
2 ETQ732 Package descriptions uploaded successfully
4 ETQ399 Looking for SAINT package for 'SAP_APPL' ...
4 ETQ399 R3upReadNewPackages:
4 ETQ399   patchType='U', langVect='DE'
4 ETQ359 RFC Login to: System="MBD", Nr="00", GwHost="saptest", GwService="sapgw00"
4 ETQ232 RFC Login succeeded
4 ETQ233 Calling function module "spda_read_new_packages" by RFC
4 ETQ399   ismovesVersion='0'
4 ETQ399 R3upReadNewPackages: exit: rc=0
4 ETQ399      Found: name = 'SAP_BS_FND', release = '701', package = 'SAPK-701GGINSAPBSFND', type = 'AOX'
4 ETQ399             (not usable, different component
4 ETQ399 ... No matching package found.
Is this related to the current SAP_APPL support pack version ?.currently we have
SAPKH47031 SP 31 for SAP_APPL 4.70
Regards
Shahnas.S

> i have few questions regarding above
(Almost) all of your questions are answered in the note:
> 2.Do wee need to apply the above note for non-unicode upgrade
<...>
Even on non-Unicode system you should replace all matchcodes that are still required by search helps.
<...>
> 3.Note 1330256  recomends to apply support pack or to apply the Note 1330256  ,but we can do it only at upgraded version.
Yes - it avoids dumping with the dump mentioned in the note
> 4.How to identify the matchcodes 
<...>
You can use the program TWTOOL01 to determine the existence of matchcodes.
<...>
> 5.How to delete them
<...>
You can then use the function module DD_MCOB_DEL to delete matchcode objects, and the function module DD_OBJ_DEL to delete matchcode IDs.
<...>
> 6.Impact of deleteing matchcodes
None since they were replaces by search helps.
Markus

Similar Messages

  • Error after upgrading from  sap b1 pl 35 to pl 49

    hello sap experts 
    iam getting the following error after upgrading from  sap b1 pl 35 to pl 49 this error is coming if we have given round off or discount in the below cell
    "Discount deviates from authorised ranges (sales oreder-discount%for document) [message 439-15] pls make it as soon as possible an i will be thankful to those guys .
    regards
    Jenny

    Hello Jenny,
    You may check by supreuser account first to see if you got the same error.  If not, it probably just related to user authorization.  If yes, it must be a bug.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Depreciation Run Error while Upgrading from SAP 4.6C TO ECC6.0

    Hi
    We are upgrading from 4.6c to ECC 6.0.  In ECC 6.0 we need to make the Number Range Interval as "Internal" and Batch Session tick to be removed from the Depreciation Document Type. 
    While executing depreciation run, it got terminated and I have done the above changes.  After that I have restarted the Depreciation.  I have got the following error Message.
    Message(s) during check of document ERROR00001
    Message no. AAPO511
    S:/SAPDMC/LSMW_AUX_020:006 20
    Message no. /SAPDMC/LSMW_AUX_020006
    If any body aware solution, kindly reply to this message
    Thanks
    siva

    Check this useful links
    Key differences between SAP 4.6 - ECC 6.0
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-hr/difference-sap-ecc60-with-sap-r3-3161113
    LE/WM functionality difference between 4.6c and ECC 6.0
    differences between SAP R/3 ECC 6 & SAP R/3 4.6C in Material management mod
    Upgrade from SAP R/3 4.6 C to ECC6.0 - To find obselete and new tcodes
    Upgrade from SAP R/3 4.6 C to ECC6.0 - To find obselete and new tcodes

  • Error during Upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0

    Hi All,
      We are facing an error when upgrading from 4.6c to ECC 6.0. We are facing this error on the table COEP - runtime object inconsistancy. What we found is there is ERP upgrade has created new extra fields in the table. In log file the error is specified as : Duplicate Field name, But we not able to find the duplicate field name in the table.  Please kindly help as early as possible. The upgrade process is stuck.
    Regards
    Anil Kumar K

    Hi Anil,
    Is this issue fixed? Can i know how you fixed it?
    replied to your message Re: How to adopt the index changes during upgrade.
    Thanks,
    Somar

  • Getting error in upgrading from Sap 2005 to sap 8.8

    Hi everyone,
    I am upgrading my client from sap 2005 to sap 8.8.During the pre check wizard system is getting some error and creating the log file.The coming error is:
    Test result: Not completed due to SBOErr -2004 in function CDagCheckUTBRecordInconsistence::DoCheck(), error text: Open user defined table   failed. # #     MID=-1     BOID=-1     BO=     UserID=     D:\SAP Setup\B18800P_19-10003894\Wizard\Upgrade.exe     Version=8.80.237     Area=     PID=4400     TID=4064     D:\depot\BUSMB_B1\8.8_REL\SBO\8.8_REL\Application\SolutionPatch\Component\Logger.cpp     105
    25/02/2011  13:52:11:765625      UpgradeWizard     Note               I     Technical     End time: 20110225 1:52:11PM # #     MID=-1     BOID=-1     BO=     UserID=     D:\SAP Setup\B18800P_19-10003894\Wizard\Upgrade.exe     Version=8.80.237     Area=     PID=4400     TID=4064     D:\depot\BUSMB_B1\8.8_REL\SBO\8.8_REL\Application\SolutionPatch\Component\Logger.cpp     105
    25/02/2011  13:52:11:765625      UpgradeWizard     Note               I     Technical     Test result: Error # #     MID=-1     BOID=-1     BO=     UserID=     D:\SAP Setup\B18800P_19-10003894\Wizard\Upgrade.exe     Version=8.80.237     Area=     PID=4400     TID=4064     
    I searched so much on this in the portal but still not able to find any solution..
    Please help me out to fix this error..
    Thanks
    Ankit Garg.

    Hi ANkit,
    if it is showing error during pre check wizrad, it will be showing SAP note number in front of  that error. check the note number details .
    Thanks,
    Neetu

  • LONGPOST.LOG Errors during Upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0

    Dear all,
    We have received the below errors during our upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0.
    Basically we have received three types of errors:
    1.
    4PETG065 RSUPGDEC: Table/structure "BAPE_VBAK" (component "SD-SLS" ) enhanced illegally: Error "2"
    2.
    A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "/IRM/BADI_SDDOCFLOW" must still be migrated
    A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "ZOTC218E_1" must still be migrated
    A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "ZZ_MG_MASS_NEWSEG" must still be migrated A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "ZOTC218E_1" must still be migrated
    A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "ZOTC218E_1" must still be migrated
    3.
    3PETG447 Table and runtime object "/SSF/DHEAD" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
    3PETG447 Table and runtime object "/SSF/DTAB" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
    3PETG447 Table and runtime object "/SSF/PTAB" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
    Can anyone help us how to solve this issues.
    Thanks & Regards
    Senthil

    Hi,
    Senthil following are ans to ur questions
    1. After the SPAU remediation is completed, should I manually release the transport or should I start the upgrade and the upgrade will release that transport?
    Ans : Once your SPAU remediation is completed you should release the requests and then start the upgrade of the DEV system.
    2. How do we import this SPDD & SPAU transport in the QA and PRD, I mean at what stage of the upgrade we need to specify/ include this transport?
    Ans : Now when you start the QA or PRD upgrade at that time you come across a phase during PREPARE called ADJUSTPRP.
    Refer following note for further information --
    SAPNote 124522 - Importing a modification adjustment in 2nd upgrade
    3. Suppose the QA & PRD has more objects to adjust than our Dev box, and this transport will not take care of the delta objects, so in that case how should we remediate, we need to create an other transport request in QA and then it will become two transports?
    Ans : First of all this should not be the scenario where you have more modified objects than that in DEV. As all the modfications should take place in DEV first and then should be transported to QA and then PRD. But in such case what you can do is complete the upgrade of QA system and then you are still having 14 days to complete the SPAU objects. So you can make another request which can be transported as a post upgrade activity once the upgrade is completed in production. For SPDD you will have to take care of the SPDD objects if there are different than those in DEV during the ACT_700 phase only or else you might risk data.
    This is the reason why SAP always asks you to follow a proper transport path.
    4. If our dev box has more objects for remediation than our QA & PRD, then will these objects be also imported into the QA & PRD box?
    Ans : Yes, thats why you should be very sure about the SPAU objects that you have found in DEV. You need to compare the objects with QA and PRD and then only make the modifications.
    I hope i have answered all your queries.
    Regards,
    Suhas

  • Error during upgrade from OBIEE 10G to 11G

    Hello All
    I ran into this issue while trying to upgrade my 10g RPD and catalog to 11.1.1.7
    After installing 11G, I launched the upgrade utility from Oracle_Common/bin/ua in linux.
    I am getting the below error:
    UPGAST-00797: Oracle Fusion Middleware Upgrade Assistant cannot be run from an Application Developer Oracle home.
    Based on the Oracle Doc. it has the following desc:
    UPGAST-00797: Oracle Fusion Middleware Upgrade Assistant cannot be run from an Application Developer Oracle home.
    Cause: The user has chosen to perform a upgrade from an Oracle home that does not allow an upgrade.
    Action: None.
    Level: 1
    Type: ERROR
    Impact: Upgrade
    So what should I do to resolve this issue?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    First of all i am not familiar on linux box.
    I tried in windows environment the rpd is deployed with out any errors.
    But i ran the ua.bat file in the following path
    \MWHOME\Oracle_BI1\bin\ua.bat.
    while i am running in oracle_common\bin\ua.bat is not responding in my local system.
    Please Mark if it helpful.
    Thanks

  • Error during upgrade from Deployment manager.

    My OWB 10.1.0.2 design repository is on an Oracle 10.1.0.2 database running on Solaris 9, using WE8ISO8859P15.
    I created a new 10.1.0.2 runtime database with UTF8 character and deployed all the objects successfully.
    But now, when I run the upgrade, it gives me the following error:
    123
    RTC-5351: A serious error occured whilst generating the Impact Report. Please review the Runtime Service Log.
    In the runtime service log, the following message shows up:
    2006/05/07-13:21:58-PDT [16FE0F4] java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 123
    at oracle.net.nl.NVTokens.parseTokens(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.net.nl.NVFactory.createNVPair(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.net.nl.NLParamParser.addNLPListElement(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.net.nl.NLParamParser.initializeNlpa(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.net.nl.NLParamParser.<init>(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.vdb.VdbUtil.findInTNSFile(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.vdb.VdbUtil.findInTNSNAMES(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.vdb.VdbUtil.buildConnectDescriptor(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.vdb.VdbUtil.buildConnectDescriptor(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.vdb.VdbSession.buildConnectionInformation(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.vdb.VdbSession.establishConnection(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.vdb.VdbSession.<init>(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.vdb.VdbSession.<init>(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.vdb.VdbAutoCommitSession.<init>(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.vdb.VdbSessionFactory.getNewAutoCommitSession(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.vdb.VdbSessionFactory.getAutoCommitSession(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.vdb.VdbSessionFactory.getAutoCommitSession(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.cmSDK.CMClient.getDBSession(CMClient.java:479)
    at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.adapter.odb.OdbCMUpgradeAdapter.prepare(OdbCMUpgradeAdapter.java:91)
    at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.DeploymentController.prepare(DeploymentController.java:101)
    at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.DeploymentController.prepare(DeploymentController.java:27)
    at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.DeploymentManager.run(DeploymentManager.java:41)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
    Please help.

    Hi
    Is there any script which was generated by the OWB in the upgrade process?
    Maybe OWB generates a drop and create script instead of alter script.
    But I suggest to you to desing and manage the database modell in a design tool (Deveploper, PowerDesigner, ...) and generate the changes from this tool.
    Ott Karesz
    http://www.trendo-kft.hu

  • Login Error after Upgrading from BW 3.5 to BI 7.0

    Hi Experts,
    We have carried out an upgrade from BW 3.5 to BI 7.0.
    After Upgrade we are not able to login using SAP GUI. we are getting an error saying..
    Username or Password not Valid..
    During the upgrade (in Netweaver 2004s ) is there procedure necessary to be followed, which we could have missed..
    Your response will be greatly appreciated.
    Regards
    LRaghunahth

    Hi
    Thanks a lot for your reponse.
    Basically I am able to login thru sap* / ddic and can unlock the users / reset the password.
    But the customer wants to know why the user is getting locked and it happened because of any procedure miss whil performing the upgrade..
    if it is usual that users get locked during upgrade, any SAP Notes to refer..
    Thanks a lot for helping in this community.
    Best Regards
    L Raghunahth

  • Can we activate Classic General Ledger in ECC6.0 during upgrade from 4.6C

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    Greetings
    My Client's technical team had upgraded their system from 4.6C to ECC6.0 and they had activated classic GL instead of New GL. And they had also activated classic withholding tax in place of Extended Withholding tax.
    They are facing some error during posting of transactions (like generation of excise invoices, posting of WHT transactions, etc.) I told that it can be a reason of not activating New GL.
    Is my understanding correct...?? Can we activate classic GL during upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6.0...??
    In case of a new client built (with ECC6.0), can we activate the classic GL instead of the New GL..??
    Does the system will work correctly in the long run if they had activated classic GL and classic WHT...??
    Please clarify. Thanks in advance for your time and efforts
    Regards,
    Chaps
    P.S. Points will be awarded for answers !!

    Hi,
    I think that you should read long text of OSS note 999614 carfully and you are
    aware of the fact that you will have additional migration efforts in
    case you need to migrate to new G/L later on.
    In case you are convinced that  this is the best way please feel free
    to deactivate new G/L as described in note 999614.
    Please make sure that you deactivate new G/L in all clients of your
    new system in case there were already client copies done.
    Yes this is possible and I would not automatically assume that
    error during posting of transactions are due to New GL not being activated.
    Note 756146 documents the issue and possible repercussions
    of using Classic GL.
    In the case of a new installation the new G/L accounting
    is active by default in ERP. In principle, the use
    of the classic GL is also possible for new customers, however,
    SAP does not recommend it since this requires an additional
    migration expense in later years.
    Regards,
    Aidan

  • Error in upgrade from 4.6 to ecc 6.0

    Hi all,
    We are upgrading from SAP 4.6 c to ecc 6.0 anr we are getting the following messages
    UPGRADEPHASE XPRAS_UPG
    1PEPU203X> Messages extracted from log file "SAPR700WG4.ORD" < Long text:
    Cause
    During the upgrade, a message relevant for postprocessing was writte to a log file. This message is not dealt with until the end of the entire upgrade. The upgrade continues.
    System Response
    The upgrade stops in phase CHK_POSTUP. To create the reference to the original log file, this message is generated by R3up.
    What to do
    Note the messages following this message and proceed according to the instructions.
    A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "Z_PMORDER_CONFIRM" must still be migrated
    A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "Z_PMORDER_UPDATE" must still be migrated
    A2PESEEF_BADI 103 BAdI implementation "ZWORKORDER_UPDATE" must still be migrated
    1PEPU203X> Messages extracted from log file "SAPR700ZG1.ORD" < Long text: see above
    A4PECOM_PRODUCT 063 Execute the upgrade report "COM_PRODUCT_UPGRADE"
    UPGRADEPHASE JOB_RDDNTPUR
    1PEPU203X> Messages extracted from log file "RDDNTPUR.ORD" < Long text: see above
    3PETG447 Table and runtime object "/SSF/PTAB" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
    Long text:
    Cause
    A runtime object was found for a table which is unknown in the ABAP Dictionary. The table contains data, which is why, as a precaution, the runtime object was not deleted. Since there is a runtime object, this means the table was once create in the ABAP Dictionary. The fact that the table can no longer be found in the ABAP Dictionary could be due to the following reasons:
    It is a customer-specific table which was created when the correction system was switched off.
    Depending on the history of your system, there may also be SAP tables which were not deleted completely, or for which only the runtime object was delivered without the related definition in the ABAP Dictionary
    System Response
    What to do
    RESET N1
    Customer-specific tables
    If it is a customer-specific table, and you still need the data, try to restore the table in the ABAP    Dictionary.
    Note the specified table type
    when you do this (transparent table, pool table, and so on). The table may still, for example, be contained in the version database.
    You can access version management through the menu "Utilities" in the  in the ABAP Dictionary (transaction SE11).
    You may also still have a copy of the system that still contains the table definition. You can also display the runtime object and create the table according to the field names, types and lengths specified in the definition. You can display the runtime object in the menu "Extras" of the database utility (transaction SE14).
    Tables in the SAP namespace
    Search for notes on these tables in OSS using the key words RDDNTPUR and TG447.
    3PETG447 Table and runtime object "STGLTRAN" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
    Long text: see above
    3PETG447 Table and runtime object "STSLEVNTSV" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
    Long text: see above
    3PETG447 Table and runtime object "STSLTOBJSV" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
    Long text: see above
    3PETG447 Table and runtime object "STSLTRANSV" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
    Long text: see above
    3PETG447 Table and runtime object "TIBAN_ACTIVE" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
    Long text: see above
    3PETG447 Table and runtime object "ZPH_RESS_STATUS" exist without DDIC reference ("Transp. table")
    Long text: see above
    Please suggest what to be done in these cases.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I think you have some BADIs or other enhancements donne in 4.6, whn tried to migrate to 6.0 causes this. Pls check whether all these objects are available/changed in 6.0.
    Regards.
    Renjith Michael.

  • Error during disconnect from FTP Server

    Hi Everyone,
    Here's my problem:
    XI has stopped picking the messages from the repository of one of servers.  Though, we have checked the XI system and can find no problems from the infrastructure side.  The adapters also show no errors and the communication channels show no errors.
    We have also checked the log viewer in XI and found the following entry:
    "Error during disconnect from frtp server ABC, ignored: com.sap.xxx.adapter.file.ftp.XXXXXX: 421 Terminating Connection."
    This FTP error relates to what we FTP server says, "421 service not available, remote server has closed connection."
    We looked at the server side, the server is working fine.
    What do you think is the error? And do we resolve this one? I'm really clueless about this..Im thinking of just restarting the J2EE engine...
    Thanks,
    Grace

    Mary,
    This question would be more relevant to the Xi forum... but on googling the error code..
    http://help.globalscape.com/help/support/Error_Codes/FTP_Codes.htm
    Error 421 Service not available, closing control connection.
    Error 421 User limit reached
    Error 421 You are not authorized to make the connection
    Error 421 Max connections reached
    Error 421 Max connections exceeded
    Possible Solutions:
    You may receive a 421 error if the FTP server you are connected to limits the total number of connections available or limits the connections available to one user.  There are three things you can do:
    1. Limit the number of connections to any one FTP site by selecting Tools > Global Options > Connection and set "Per site max connections / transfers" to 1 (By default it will be set to 2).
    2. Remove items from the Transfer Queue.  The Transfer Queue is where you see items ready for transfer, in transit, or just transferred.  Sometimes the Queue Pane can become cluttered with unfinished transfers.  To clear the queue, right-click inside it and choose Remove All.
    Also try using an FTP manager like cuteFTP or something of that sort to see if you can open the connection - it could be related to the FTP settings...
    Arun
    Hope it helps....

  • Upgrade from SAP Webas 6.40 to SAP Netweaver 2004s

    Do we have to change the virtual host name used for high availability clustering environment to local host name before we conduct the upgrade from SAP WebAS 6.40 to SAP NetWeaver 2004's ?

    Do we have to change the virtual host name used for high availability clustering environment to local host name before we conduct the upgrade from SAP WebAS 6.40 to SAP NetWeaver 2004's ?

  • Follow up activities after SAP (CU&UC) upgrade from SAP 4.6c to ECC6 EHP4

    Dear Friends
    We have completed SAP (CU&UC) upgrade from SAP 4.6c to ECC6 EHP4.
    We refereed the upgrade guide for follow activities and we required confirmation before performing the activities.
    Could you please help us what needs to be done immediately after upgrade.
    Regards,
    Bharathi

    Dear Nils,
    Thanks for the support.
    Yes, we are following the same document 'CUUC46C_to_NW701SP07' for unicode conversion after the upgrade from the note 928729.
    Please suggest us in that document which are the steps should be carried out after ECC6.0 EHP4 upgrade,
    1. Preparation
    2. Unicode Preconversion Phase in SAP Basis 4.6C
    3. Upgrade Process
    4. Unicode Conversion Phase
    5.  Unicode Conversion Completion Phase
    6. SAP Notes
    Regards,
    Bharathi

  • Is it possible for XI 2.0 to connect to ECC 6.0 upgraded from SAP R/3 4.6?

    Hi,
    I just wanted to know whether it is possible for XI 2.0 to be used with ECC 6.0 which is upgraded from SAP R/3 4.6.
    If yes, could you forward some links so as to know how.
    Thanks,
    Fariha

    hi,
    >>>>Is that Possible..?
    yes
    >>>Wont there be any additional configuration needed ?
    if you use IDOCs then you don't need anything special
    Regards,
    michal

Maybe you are looking for