Error for ERS settlement of frieght POs

Hello All
We have an issue where user is trying to settle Automated Freight POs with search criteria as (company code US20) and GR posting date (From- Blank/ To - till date) through MRRL transaction.
Errors:
1.Posting date is initial for few of them
2."External system returned different number of lines than received" for remaining ones.
I tried the same in testing client by settling them in batches say for a month and then it did not give an error and were settled as desired.
Could anyone please help me on both errors. There is no long text available for the same.
Best Regards

can anyone please help or share knowledge on above errors?

Similar Messages

Account Determination Error for Rebate Settlements

I have question on Account Determination for rebates
Here are the entries that I have made in VKOA
ERB - R201051
ERU - R201051 / R120201
ERS - R120201
ERL - R559001
I am able to accrue the money to right accounts, but I am getting an Account Determination error when processing rebate settlements
Any input on this would be really helpful.
Thank you!

Hi Shailesh
When you are getting the error in rebate settlements it means you carefully check
all the combinations for VKOA settings. Whether the Account assignment
group in all the Materials used in settlement document along with the customer account assignment group
is maintained or not. Also check in the pricing procedure the account key used.
For all these account key the settings are made in VKOA or not. Hope it will help you
Thanks
sushant

Balance in transaction currency error for AUC settlement

I was trying to perform AUC settlement and hit Balance in transaction currency error. When i open up the line items I found that there are 2 sets (duplicate) of data posted to the depreciation area. The second set is with value 0 except depreciation area 01 posted as 100000EUR.
so now i have 2 line with 100000EUR for depreciation area 01. I guess this is the main culprit of generating the error Balance in transaction currency.
I'd glad if someone can tell me why they are 2 sets of data generated in line items? I only post the vendor invoice against the AUC once.
Or perhaps am I heading to the right way in identifying the root cause of this issue?
This is part of the AC010 course part of asset accounting that teaching on AUC aasets.
Any positive reply is welcomed!
I attached the line item image. Please note that there are some lines hidden for dep area beyond 03. and all are with amount 0.
[Line Item Image|http://www.bnl.com.my/photos/aucsettle.jpg]
Edited by: Kam Weng Leong on Dec 13, 2009 5:00 AM

I was trying to perform AUC settlement and hit Balance in transaction currency error. When i open up the line items I found that there are 2 sets (duplicate) of data posted to the depreciation area. The second set is with value 0 except depreciation area 01 posted as 100000EUR.
so now i have 2 line with 100000EUR for depreciation area 01. I guess this is the main culprit of generating the error Balance in transaction currency.
I'd glad if someone can tell me why they are 2 sets of data generated in line items? I only post the vendor invoice against the AUC once.
Or perhaps am I heading to the right way in identifying the root cause of this issue?
This is part of the AC010 course part of asset accounting that teaching on AUC aasets.
Any positive reply is welcomed!
I attached the line item image. Please note that there are some lines hidden for dep area beyond 03. and all are with amount 0.
[Line Item Image|http://www.bnl.com.my/photos/aucsettle.jpg]
Edited by: Kam Weng Leong on Dec 13, 2009 5:00 AM

Error doing ERS for planned delivery costs

Hello!
We post the freight for STOs via the FRB1 condition as our delivery costs. The freight vendor is of course, different from the vendor in the STO itself which is the plant. The freight vendor is marked for ERS settlement and the ERS works fine for it from the shipment cost documents of sales orders. However, while doing the ERS in transaction MRRL for the same freight vendor for planned delivery costs, nothing comes up in the list to settle. The delivery has been goods issued and freight accounted for. What could be going wrong here? What do I need to check?
Thanks!

OK, I got this issue resolved...don't know what was wrong and I didn't change anything but it is working now Freaky. But I do have one more related issue - hopefully someone can shed some light on it. For the freight vendor, we have a different PI partner in the vendor master set up by the plants - when I do the ERS, it is not creating the A/P against that different Invoicing Party (PI) - it is creating the A/P for the same freight vendor code...any clue what is needed to make it create the A/P for the different Invoicing Party that we have set up?
Thanks!

Error in consignment settlement

Hi,
I am getting the error for consignment settlement as follows:
Document 5100000007 MUL does not exist in fiscal year 2009
MUL is company code.
Pls guide.
Regards.

Hi,
Go to OMBT, check whether you have maintain number range as year Specific or maintain year 9999.
if you have maintain year specific then maintain for 2009.
but basically it not year specific as i think then go to MB03 and check ur doument for which year it is created.
Now, may be you have posted that stock before april. then change to 2008 and go the settlement.c
if this is accounting document then go to FBN1 and maintain year specific number range
Regards,
Pardeep malik

ERS Settlement Error message Reg

Dear All,
Im doing the ERS settlement configuration first time i have configured the Messages and outputs but at the time of settlement run it is showing error message as "ERS Settlement No message was found for partner 305469 company code 1000"
how to resolve this issue...
REgards
Anand.

hi,
have you configured the condition record for the output type ERS with that particular vendor what you are using.
check and revert back.
Regards,'
velu

User Exit for ERS (Evaluated Receipt Settlement ) while Creating PO

Hi All ,
i have a Specific Requirement ,
When ever an PO is created for ERS Vendors , The ERS check box at Invoice tab would be Ticked by default for specific document types ,
But for all other document type this ERS tick from PO item detail (invoice Tab) should get unticked automatically.
Is there a User Exit for ERS at PO level
Thx ,

Hi
Please verify that the user running the report as well as the RFC User in the SRM system must have proper authorization to execute the report. For time being, provide SAP_ALL profile, and then try out the same.
Also, check whether for the R/3 back-end Vendor, the ERS is set or not.
Please confirm this -
You want to set the ERS indicator for the documents sent from SRM into R/3 system. Is this your requirement ?
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points.
Regards
- Atul

ERS Settlement Issue

Hi all,
I'm facing an error "ERS settlement: No message was found for partner ....../company code ......"
while doing settelment through MRRL Transaction.
Pls Note: I had done all the settings to the best of my knowledge, but still this Error is appearing.
Settings that i had done and Checked:
1. In Vendor Master --> Purchasing View.
Set the GR Based IV Verfication and AutoEvalGRSetmt Del. indicators.
2. In Purchase Info Rec --> No ERS checked is removed.
3. In Purchase Order, GR Based IV and ERS Check are defaulted and Tax Code is also Specified.
4. Message output is also Defined in SPRO
Message type is maintained with Access Seq 0002 'Ccode + Vendor'
condition is also maintained in MRM1 transaction and Printer is also attached in communication.
But still i'm facing this error.
Regards,
S Anand

Hi
error : ( ERS settlement: No message was found for partner ERS : co code : 1111)
Ans : SPRO u2192 Logistic Invoice verification u2192 Message determination u2192 Master condition.
Message setting = ERS
Key combination ; Co. Code;
Regards
anand

GOA distribution to R3 - Tax Code for ERS vendors

Hi all,
Having an issue with GOA distribution to R3 for evaluated receipt settlement vendors. For ERS vendors, tax code is a required field. There is not a tax code field in the GOA and this is not being passed in any iDoc segment I can find. My current tax configuration is calculate tax in backend, i have maintained tax codes I0.U1, I1 with U1 set as default. As shopping carts are transferred from R3 they are assigned U1 as expected and PO's generated in the BE from these external requirements are getting the U1 as expected. The problem is with contracts and scheduling agreements. Everything is fine unless the vendor has the ERS indicator set. Tax code becomes a required field.
Has anyone else experienced this? I've' researched SDN and everything talks about shopping carts and PO's, which is working for us. I cant find any info on the contract distribution. I've investigated the BADI's associated with tax calculation in SRM but I'm not sure these meet the requirement for ERS vendors.
Am I missing configuration? Is one of the tax badi's the way to go? Any information is appreciated.
SRM SERVER 550
R3 46c
Classic - Plan-Driven Procurement
Thanks,
Justin

Hi
Please refer to few OSS notes.
Note 1033458 - Item level Tolerance values in GOA not transferred to R/3
1012486 Important Information on upgrading ERP-Systems in HA-Setups
1014820 Indicators reset in Active versions when line item added
1029026 Prob in conf. create-Diff in ERS flag for SRM and R/3 vendor
849567 Output Control for ERS Invoice in Program BBPERS
703876 Release note SRM Server 5.0 SP00
762984 SRM40-SUS: Implementation of customer enhancement fields
1010791 Flag Confirmation based Invoice Verification set erroneous
1018855 Vendor flag POR expected is not replicated from backend
Note 967107 - New logic for grouping backend contracts out of a GOA
909516 SRM40/CTR:New line itm distribution flag cannot be unchecked
1025863 Wrong Currency code during GOA replication to R/3
1009872 Contracts : GOA Distribution value divided by 100
908058 CheckMan errors - Attachment Original transfer for Contracts
940632 Distribution incorrect-When invalid Purchasing Org entered
942008 SRM Distribution of GOA to R/3 System: Scales missing
945029 Distribution of Target Quantity to QW8 failed
880097 Attachment Original transfer for Contracts
989367 Performance improvement for new GOA distribution logic
916562 CM/CND: Dump in distribution of GOA with deleted line items
922172 Contract attachment distribution enhancements
925014 More than one attachment not getting distributed to backend
923627 Attachement transfer to backend with possible file formats
923227 Attachments transfer not working in Background
937221 CTR: Impossible to modify distribution in Initial Upload GOA
967107 New logic for grouping backend contracts out of a GOA

Incase this OSS notes, don't work, then
Please try do this as well. Uncheck the ERS indicator, but then also pass tax codes from from GOA.
Then try out again.
For BADIs and other useful information, refer to these forum linksGOA Distribution SRM 5.0-ECC 6.0 - Account Category & Multiple Distribution
Distribution of GOA in R/3
Source determination in backend (R/3) for distributed contract i.e. GOA
FM or BADI s' used to create a GOA
Transaction For Creating GOA
Incase nothing helps, Please raise a OSS message with SAP as well.
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

Error while Asset settlement

as i have transferred last year internal order balance to the new internal order in this year.
and when i was running th Ko88 for AUC to main asset settlemnt it gave me below error.
Error during acquisition transfer: Depr. area does not exist
Message no. AAPO107
Diagnosis
According to the specifications for transfer variant 5, depreciation area 02 should be transferred gross. However, the recieving asset 1100 1000008-0 does not manage this depreciation area.
Procedure
Check the transfer variant and the receiving asset.
i am confused wht it is?
please reply asap
thanks

lidia
i have a below complex situation.
user has posted value to IO and they settled it to AUC in last year but they did not settle it to Main asset.
so anyting they have settled to last year to AUC, now it needs to be settled to Main asset but it is not allowing me to do that and shooting me error that ''First settle items from the previous year in the previous year"
so how can i settle AUC amount to main asset which was settled in last year?
please help

Error while doing settlement

Hi,
I am getting the below error while doing the settelment
Program Errors: no COBRB found 001
Kindly advice me
Thanks
Supriya

Hi Supriya,
COBRB is table for Settlement Rules for Order Settlement. Debug if the Table itself is missing or table contains no entries to be picked up for settlement...
Pls revert back with update...
Srikanth Munnaluri

Error during automatic settlement rule creation

Hi Gurus,
For the investment project, I maintained as follows, first level WBSE - Only planning element - no settlement. 2nd level WBSE - settled to AuCs. For level three & below settled to Superior WBSE. I had created the Settlement type with '5'. When I am executing CJB2 to create the Settlement rules automatically, I am getting the following error message for level 3 & below WBSE.
Enter a valid value for the settlement type :
Message no. KD199
Diagnosis
The system found a settlement type settlement type in the settlement rule which either does not exist or is unsuitable for the sender.
Procedure
If possible, enter a suitable settlement rule. Remember that the rules for preliminary settlement ("PRE") of capital investment measures are different from those for period settlement ("PER") of other settlement senders. Periodic settlement only makes sense for capital investment measures. They must not have any "PER" rules.
To enter an investment profile (in the control data for an order or WBS element) or to remove it. However, first delete the PER or PRE rules (in the settlement rule) and er zu in internal orders, you can first change the investment profile and then adapt the rules before you save.
Error(s) during creation of settlement rule :
Message no. ORB509
Diagnosis
Errors occurred during the check on settlement receivers.
System Response
Processing stopped.
Procedure
Check whether the:
Specific receiver Account assignment e actually exists
Settlement profile Z7 permits account assignment to the specified receiver
can anyone help me where I am making mistake or what is the procedure to be adopted for such scenario.
somebody else also had discussed the same issue in this forum but there is no answer for this.
thanks in advance
Vinodh

hi Sreenivas,
Thanks for your reply,
I tried this, system is giving the following error now
Could not find a superior WBS element for WBS element
Message no. CJ115
Diagnosis
The system could not find a superior element for a WBS element while it was executing the function 'Derive structure'
System Response
Processing stopped.
What could be the reason ?
thanks in advance,
Vinodh

VA88 - Error list of settlement run displays irrelevant sales orders

Hi All,
This is a problem relating to transaction VA88 for settlement of sales orders into COPA. The error list of the settlement run is unnecessarily long since it also includes old, irrelevant sales orders that have no postings since the last VA88 run.
'Old' sales orders without recent postings on them are considered in the settlement run despite having the indicator "check trans. data" switched on in the VA88 selection screen.
What could be the reason???
Ideally, system should ignore the irrelevant sales orders (those without any transactional postings since the last settlement) if we select the "check transactional data" option in the VA88 selection screen
Any suggestions, thoughts, solutions would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Soumya
Edited by: Soumya Bhattacharya on Mar 17, 2009 10:42 AM

Hi Soumya
Please see below. Transaction data checks are not made in the following situations, even
if the indicator is set:
1. The sender has a results analysis key, and an accrual calculation
    was already executed. In Customizing for accrual calculation, line
    item updates are not active for a version relevant for settlement.
2. The sender has a variance key and variances have already been
    determined.
3. The sender is a capital investment measure and has the technically
    completed status. Alternatively, the sender is an investment measur
    and the settlement was started with processing type 3.
4. The settlement rule was changed since the last settlement.
5. There is a valid distribution rule for fixed amounts.
6. Both a periodic distribution rule and an overall distribution rule
    have been defined for the settlement of costs with the same origin,
    and only the periodic distribution rule was used for the last
    settlement.
Basically you should see if any of these scenarios exist in your case. Item no. 6 looks like the most probable cause. Please check them again.
Hope this helps. Let me know.
Karthik

MIRO invoice for ERS Vendor

Can an Invoice be posted manually for a P.O in which ERS is enabled and against an ERS vendor ?
Thanks
Vinay Sridhar

Hi,
There is nothing wrong.
If you run the ERS settlement program after the MIRO you will find that this will NOT create a duplicate payment.
If by doing this you are having a problem, then let us know and we will see what we can do to help.
If you are just curious as to whether this is correct or not then it is perfectly OK to post an invoice for an ERS PO. If this happens AFTER the settlement then the invoice would be blocked for payment. If it happens BEFORE the settlement has been run then it would NOT be blocked for payment (GR qty equals Inv qty) but the settlement program should then NOT create a payment.
You can decide to stop this from happening by configuring the message to E or leave it as W and continue.
Steve B

Need help with output type EDI for ERS

All,
I want to be able to run and ERS settlement and have the invoices created sent via EDI/XML to the supplier.   I have several questions on the set up.
1) I have output type ERS6 which is defined as ERS EDI. I assume because it does not start with Z* this is SAP standard, so I shouldn't have to modify any of this.
2) I've added my supplier to this output type.
3) I assume I need to create a partner profile for this supplier? If so can someone tell me the message type to use?
Is there any set up I'm missing in this process?   I've executed ERS but do not get an idoc and I'm fairly certain it's because I haven't done the partner profile set-up.
Thanks for your help.
Sandra

Hi,
You don't have to modify thise setup unless you have any customized requirement.
You are missing partner profile setup.Carry out the setup and run MRRL tcode to create the idocs
Enter the following values using tcode WE20.
Field                                       Value
Message type                         GSVERF
Partner type                             LI (vendor)
Partner function                        LF (vendor)
Port                                         SUBSYSTEM ( Port to your middleware)
Output mode                            such as Collect IDocs
Basic type                                GSVERF01
Application                                 MR
Output type                                ERS6 or the type you have defined
Regards,
Karuna

Error for ERS settlement of frieght POs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for