Error Handling of Sync/Async Bridge

Hello,
does the error handling of an sync/async bridge behave exactly as the error handling of a single sync sender?
Details are the following:
I would like to use the error handling capabilites of a sync step, so that the error handling branch is executed when a permanent pipeline error occurs (this is only possible with a sync send step). However my receiver system can only communicate asynchronously. So the question is, if the first asynchronous send step fails (e.g. error in pipeline processing) normally no error is triggered. Would this be different if the error occurs withing a sync/async bridge?

Hi Abhishek,
Thanks for the immediate reply.
The scenario is
ERP <---WS/SOAP--->PI -----WS /SOAP of 3rd party---> 3rd Party system (X).
PI <------- WS of PI
X posts the data to a backend. THe system X then picks some processed information. This system is not capable of sending the response synchronosly. It can post this data to PI once the data is available. Now PI needs to take this data and post it to the WS request from ERP.
Hope I have provided some clarity on the scenarion..
Thanks again.
Bharathwaj
Edited by: Bharathwaj on Aug 11, 2009 4:59 PM

Similar Messages

Getting Time-Out Error in Sync-Async Bridge

Hi All,
My IP has a Sync-Async Bridge. I have a fork, two senders, two switchs and a transformation step inside the bridge.
If XI takes much time to process the IP, the send step that closes sync-async bridge is not waiting for the message after a particular period and throws time out error to the sender.
Is it possible to increase the waiting time for sync-async bridge?
This IP works correctly 8 out of 10 times. Sometimes the message is sitting permenantly in the queue(smq2) and gives me system failure error.
Can u tell me why this problem happening?
Thanks & Regards,
Senthil.

Dear Michal/Senthil,
Can you pl clear a confusion that i have had for ages...
suppose there is a sync/async bridge ( i understand that it is used for sync business system too async BS communcation )
where we have 4 steps
sync receive - > async send -> async receive -> sync send..
i do understand that async send and async receive are combined through correlation
but i do not understand how do they work..
i mean when async send say send a file to a target system...does async receive reads a file from the same folder based on the corelation or wat...
basically can you pls explain me how do the steps 2 and 3 above work
Edited by: Tarang Shah on Mar 3, 2009 12:51 PM

Sync/Async bridge via JMS with FAULT messages

Hello all, 
I set up a sync/async bridge scenario with using of JMS communication channel (SAP - JMSReceiverCC - JMSServer and application - JMSSenderCC - SAP). The normal communication works fine. 
But what we can not solve is the Fault Message handling. If there is a application error behind the JMS, a fault message is generated instead of proper application response and sent back to XI. Without any additional setup of JMS Sender CC the processing of the message ends with "MAPPING - EXCEPTION_DURING_EXECUTE", because normal "response mapping" is executed instead of "fault message mapping". This is correct behavior without any discussion. 
[SAPhelp|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/45/202845de34072ce10000000a155369/frameset.htm] says that there are 2 module parameters to be set : fault, faultNamespace. The description is rather vague, so let's see, what the "NotifyResponseBean" does, when parameters fault/faultNamespace are filled: 
<pre>if(fault != null && faultNamespace != null)
if(faultNamespace.equals("http://sap.com/xi/XI/System"))
 ((XIMessage)message1).setMessageClass(MessageClass.SYSTEM_ERROR);
 ((XIMessage)message1).setError(fault, "no additional information");
} else
 ((XIMessage)message1).setMessageClass(MessageClass.APPLICATION_ERROR);
 ErrorInfo errorinfo = message1.createErrorInfo();
 errorinfo.setAttribute("ApplicationFaultInterface", fault);
 errorinfo.setAttribute("ApplicationFaultInterfaceNamespace", faultNamespace);
 errorinfo.setAttribute("ErrorCode", fault);
 errorinfo.setAttribute("AdditionalErrorText", "no additional information");
 message1.setErrorInfo(errorinfo);
} else
((XIMessage)message1).setMessageClass(MessageClass.APPLICATION_RESPONSE);
}</pre> 
The code is pretty straight forward so one could assume, that it's the name and namespace of inbound synchronnous message interface what is supposed to be filled in the values of each parameter. And from that kind of information SAP XI can evolve how to handle the response, actually the fault. 
Unfortunatelly the real situation is different - every time the fault message is generated and sent back to XI, the response is correctly corelated with the request message, "WaitResponseBean" and "NotifyResponseBean" are finished correctly and the processing crashes in messaging class on following exception: 
java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.Hashtable.put(Hashtable.java:592) at
com.sap.aii.messaging.mo.MessageContext.setAttribute(MessageContext.java:140) at
com.sap.aii.adapter.xi.ms.XIMessage.updateHeaders(XIMessage.java:4244) at
com.sap.aii.adapter.xi.ms.XIMessage.getTransportHeaders(XIMessage.java:570) at
com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.impl.ServerConnectionImpl.request(ServerConnectionImpl.java:212) at
com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.impl.core.transport.http.MessagingServlet.doPost(MessagingServlet.java:337) at ...
 
Is there anyone, who can put more light on JMS sync/async bridge fault handling ???
 
Thank you ... 
Regards
Tomas

Hello again,
I proceed in investigation little more, but the main problem has not been solved. I found that the problem is not even in WaitResponseBean (placed in JMCReceiverCC). This bean is woken up properly on base of proper CorrelationID. See the log:
2009-10-15 11:00:33 Success WRB: entering WaitResponseBean
2009-10-15 11:00:33 Success WRB: retrieving the message for f1ea1fc0-b96d-11de-9b68-00144f4acd86 ...
2009-10-15 11:00:46 Success WRB: retrieved the message: ApplicationError
2009-10-15 11:00:46 Success WRB: leaving WaitResponseBean
I think, that the problem is somewhere within main messaging functionality. I suppose that on base of exception message:
com.sap.aii.messaging.mo.MessageContext.setAttribute(MessageContext.java:140) at
which is generated.
Any ideas or comments ?
Thank you in advance.
Regards
Tomas

Sync-Async Bridge with Acknowledgment

Hello Everybody
I have a Sync-Async Bridge (RFC <-> BPM -> File). I have defined my Asynchronous Send Step in BPM to request acknowledgment from the Receiver File Adapter. The File Adapter returns that acknowledgment but, I would like to check acknowledgment status to define the next step of ccBPM. For example, for negative acknowlegment status I would like to stop/cancel BPM. Is that possible?
Thanks
Julio

Hi Julio !
SAP Note 837285:
"Permanent negative acknowledgements: If the BPE receives a
permanent negative system or application acknowledgment, the
asynchronous send step waiting for it triggers a system error for
which you can define an exception handling."
Put your async send step inside a block and create an exception branch..I think that for the file adapter ack you will need a deadline branch also because if the ack is not received, the BPM will keep waiting for it endlessly.
Regards,
Matias.
Message was edited by:
Matias Denker

Using WAIT step in Sync/Async Bridge

I am using a sync/async bridge and placed a 1 minute wait step in between my async send and async reply. When I test my process, the async reply comes in but then my 1 minute wait eventually times out and gives me an error. Can someone guide me in fixing this BPM design (which steps to add and how)?
http://webpages.charter.net/kpwendel/bpm_with_wait.jpg
I would like it to stop waiting once the async reply comes in and not timeout. If the 1 minute mark comes and a reply never came in, it would also be nice to send back an error message.
Thanks!

I pulled my WAIT task and had this scenario working a week ago. I have not made any changes, but now my inbound replies to close the BPM and link up to the request are not "linking". The request is eventually timing out even though the reply with a good correlation id comes in successfully. Any suggestions?
UPDATE: I went through my objects in the IB:Config and resaved/activated them and now it is working. Don't know what messed them up in the first place.
Message was edited by: Keith Wendel

BPM - Receive Sync/ASync Bridge Problem

Hi,
I am creating a scenario for an inbound Synch request to be serviced by a BPM process.
Here is the problem that I am facing while trying to configure the Receive Step
- I created a Message Interface defined as Abstract Synchronous.
- I created a process model and put in a Receive Step: Mode - Opens S/A Bridge, Synchronous Interface - defined as above.
- I define a container with Abstract type. But when I try to locate the above defined Abstract Synch message interface, I cannot find it.
- As a workaround, I create another Abstract Message Interface defined as Abstract ASynch.
- I create a container with this Abstract ASynch message type.
- I use this container in the Receive Step.
But activating the Business Process gives the error:
Message to be received and Synchronous Interface do not have identical types.
Can someone give me the correct procedure to configure the Sync / ASync Bridge ? thanks,
-Manish

Dan,
This is the link you are looking for?
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/83/d2a84028c9e469e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm

Sync / Async Bridge without BPM

Hi All,
I was trying to implement the Sync / Async Bridge without the BPM. I am trying a HTTP to JMS Sync / Async Bridge. I have followed the following link and done exactly the same as shown in the document
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/EN/45/20d2b4c20a0732e10000000a155369/content.htm
I have used a Java application which will poll the request queue and then place the message in the response queue with the same correlation ID frm the request queue.
After following the above link the response message was not appearing, the message were going to deilvering status and after some time i found that they were cancelled without errors
I searched in the forums for many solutions but what i found was this thread which stated that since the XI message ID is 32 bytes and Correlation ID is only 24 bytes its difficult for Modules to identify the response since the correlation is truncated.
JMS: Synch/Async bridge - how to configure
I tried changing the configuration in the reciver JMS channel to XI Conversion ID instead of Message ID and this also doesnt give me fruitfull results. The message was not being placed in the request queue, it gave an error saying that the conversion id was null. Though in the thread it seems to have worked for him.
After this i planned to dynamically generate a Correlation ID (a dummy one) of 24bytes and i sent it to the request queue this time the message was retrived from the response queue only to find that the correlation ID this time has been converted to some other format
Corrletion ID sent to the request queue: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWX
Corrlation ID coming in the response queue : 4142434445464748494a4b4c4d4e4f505152535455565758
Can anyone put some light on what i exactly need to do or tell me why the conversion ID worked for Daneil in the thread and it gave me an error saying that the Conversion id is null
Rgds
Aditya

Hi Prateek,
This is what was tried in my first case. I did exactly what was given in that link.But since the Message id being 32 bytes and length of correlation id is 24 bytes id is getting truncated.
So its not working fine.
@ke i am having a look at the note will update you on this
Thanks for your response
Rgds
Aditya

REG : SYNC/ASYNC bridge

Hi all,
I have a scenario where my sender is a syncronus and receiver is asyncronus. I have used sync/async bridge in BPM to acheive this.But when i send the input data from runtime workbench with QOS as BEST EFFORT i got the following error " Error While sending the message". When checked in moni, the data has sucessfully sent to the receiver and in the BPM flow is failing at the last step (ie SEND step which sents syncronus respose and which ends the bridge)
The steps i used in BPM are
RECEIVE(start of sync/async bridge)--> SEND(which sends data to receiver)--
>SEND(which ends the sync/asynbridge) The response that i send is same which i receive(input data) , so i didnot use any step for response .
I ran the wizard for 2 times :
1) from my source to BPM in which is syncronus.
2)from BPM to receiver which is asyncronus.
Can anyone please provide me solution for the above problem.

Hi Srinivas,
In BPM second step,
Send step it would configure the properties as a " Synchronous". then only response back to the sender.
Regards,
sateesh

Need help with scenario BPM Http-RFC Sync/async bridge

hi all!
i've got the following scenario: HTTP-BPM(XI)-RFC synchronous both of them. for that, i'm using S/A bridge in the BPM, but i'm getting the error 'Timeout condition of pipeline reached'. i think the problem is that the process gets lost in the sync/async communication, because in the trace level shows CL_XMS_PLSRV_CALL_BPE-ENTER_PLSRV" and after that every message are 'wait time starting'.
don't know the reason of the error. Maybe I missed something to configure?
the BPM is like this:
Receiver(Open Sync/Async bridge) -> Transformation (mapping from http request to RFC request) -> SyncSend (RFC request and response) -> Transformation (mapping from rfc response to http response) -> Send (Close S/A Bridge)
the IR is configured like this:
Message Types u2013 External Definitions u2013 Imported Objects
mt_cxml_request -> contains xsd of xcml request template.
mt_cxml_response -> contains xsd of xcml response template.
zintegracion_pedidos -> imported RFC from R/3
zintegracion_pedidos.response -> imported RFC from R/3
Message Interfaces
mi_cxml_request_async_abs
mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
mi_cxml_request_sync_out
mi_xcml_response_async
mi_rfc_request_asyn_abs
mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
mi_rfc_request_sync_in
mi_rfc_response_async_abs
Message Mappings
mm_cxml_request_to_rfc_request -> mapping from http request (cxml) to rfc request.
mm_rfc_response_to_cxml_response -> mapping from rfc response to http response (cxml).
Interface Mappings
im_cxml_request_async_abs_to_rfc_request_async_abs
im_rfc_response_async_abs_to_cxml_response_async_abs
and the ID is configured like this:
Business system DES -> created business system for RFC adapter with interface mi_rfc_request_sync_in as receiver. Comunication channel u2018RFC Receiveru2019
Businnes service VW -> created businnes service for HTTP adapter with interface mi_cxml_request_sync_out as sender. Comunication channel u2018HTTP Senderu2019
Receiver Determination
two receiver determinations. One for BPM and the other one for RFC(R/3):
|VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_out:
|BPM_PO| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs:
Interface Determination
two interface determinations:
|VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_out | | BPM_PO:
|BPM_PO| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs | * | * :
Sender Agreement
VW
mi_cxml_request_sync_out
Receiver Agreement
|BPM_PO| |DES| mi_rfc_request_sync_in

hi all,
i've removed the transformations from the BPM, and i've created:
in IR:
- interface mapping: im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                source interface: mi_cxml_request-sync_abs
                                target interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
in ID:
- receiver determination: |VW| mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                  sender service: VW
                                  interface: mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                  receiver: DES
                                  interface mapping:im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
- interface determination: |VW| mi_cxml_erquest_sync_abs ||
                                     sender service: VW
                                     interface: mi_cxml_request_sync_abs
                                     inbound interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
                                     interface mapping: im_xcml_request_to_rfc_request_sync_abs
- receiver agreement: |VW| |DES| mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
                               sender service: VW
                               receiver service: DES
                               receiver interface: mi_rfc_request_sync_abs
not sure these are the steps i had to do for mapping xml to rfc. but the result is the same error as before, the timeout.
i couldn't test with RTW because i'm getting an error 401 unauthorized.
i'd do it without BPM but the issue is that i wanted to add another step that would be to send the response from rfc to mail too once i got this BPM running. i mean, the response from RFC would be sent to http response and mail both.
the only way i can imagine to do it is with BPM but i'm really fed up with it.
thank u very much folks

Async-Sync-Async Bridge Without BPM

HI Folks,
I have a requirement as
u201CAn Asynchronous SOAP request is triggered to PI and then should get records from a (JDBC)database and write the result to a fileu201D
It is of Aync-Sync-Async Bridge and i have to do without BPM
I know by using some module parameters at sender communication channel we can do this.
But my query
1)Is that for SOAP sender communication channel can we provide the same module parameters
Number - ModuleName - Type - ModuleKey
1- AF_Modules/RequestResponseBean - Local Enterprise Bean - 1
2- CallSapAdapter-Local Enterprise Bean - 2
3-AF_Modules/ResponseOnewayBean-3
Parameters
ModuleKey - ParameterName - ParameterValue
1 - passThrough - true
3-receiverChannel - Receiver File Adapter Name
3-receiverService - Receiver Business Service/ System
2) Does the SOAP support the without BPM scenarios
3)Scenario is like Soap --> JDBC -->File (Async - Sync - Async) and how abt for Soap --> RFC -->File (Async - Sync - Async)
Thanks in Advance
Lemon

For your requirement , you can handle this scenario without BPM in two ways.
1) Async sync bridge without BPM. You are going to use request response bean and one way response bean module to achieve this. very simple. See this [link|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/File-RFC-File(Without%20BPM)]
In the sender SOAP channel you have to configure first request response bean, second callsapadapter and third onewayresponse bean. Refer this link. Simply follow file sender configuration for your soap sender or RFC sender.
Note: one receiver agreement , one receiver determination, one interface determination. only two receiver channels one jdbc and one file.
2) You can create SOAP to File asynchronous. Using quality of service EO and creating service interface asynchronous mode. In the mapping area do JDBC lookup. If your version is 7.1 then this lookup is available. This is pretty simple no need to do async to sync pattern.
Hope that helps.

Payload based sync/async bridge

This is my scenario: ABAP -> XI -> MQ -> XI -> ABAP
I want to use the message content to be the correlation key, it means ABAP sends a message with order no.="ORDER1" to MQ and MQ will reply a message contains order no.="ORDER1". Then XI will use this message from MQ to reply to the sync ABAP program. Is it possible ?
I read this document "How-to Correlate JMS 1.20" to build a sync/async bridge (XI is 3.0 SP17)
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/5059f110-0d01-0010-7c8b-fdc983be70c0
First, I followed 3.1 to build a "header based" sync/async bridge. It's ok, I can see a message id in the field "JMSCorrelationID" in MQ tool. (I didn't test reply). And then I checked 3.4 in the document and want to build a "payload based".
There are only 2 steps in this document
1. I modified the correlation to the order no. field of request message in the send step.
2. I modified the correlation to the order no. field of reply message in the correlation editor.
Is it ok ? Because when I ran the ABAP program again, I still see the same JMSCorrelationID in MQ?

Thanks, so, the correlation id is encoded. I think I can see "ORDER1" originally. I changed it to "ORDER2" and see another correlation id and I changed it back to "ORDER1" and I see the original correlation id. I think the configuration of ABAP -> XI -> MQ should be correct now.
Now my problem is MQ -> XI -> ABAP. I manually put a message with order no.="ORDER1" in the reply queue. XI got it, but show the error message in workbench.
"XI inbound processing failed for message at 2007-03-28|18:15:22.464+0800. JMS and XI identifiers for message are ID:414d51204d495453303153305420202045a35b480003f722 and 3cf8ed80-dd15-11db-a560-0017a47618a6 respectively. JMS adapter will rollback database and JMS session transactions"
Both of the messages are not the encoded "ORDER1" and when I press refresh in workbench, the 2nd id in the error message is always changed. Is there any suggestion for it ? thanks.

RFC -File Sync Async bridge RFC Adapter Exception

Hi
I am using sync async bridge to send a response back to rfc.
Although there is no error in sxmb_moni as well as the auditlog shows that the response was sent successfully to rfc.. still the RFC adapter gives the following error with no response sent to RFC..
Error in processing caused by: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.RfcAdapterException: failed to identify XML document:java.lang.Exception: javax.xml.parsers.FactoryConfigurationError: Provider com.sap.engine.lib.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl not found
please help

Solved the problem..
The problem could be due to the following..
1. the response structure was just a single character..while i was sending a whole string..
2. I restarted the server...probably the problem
javax.xml.parsers.FactoryConfigurationError: Provider com.sap.engine.lib.jaxp.SAXParserFactoryImpl not found
system property must have set mismatch for the SAXFactoryImpl.... by deploying modules before in which i was using SAX parser.. may be the i set the system property earlier to other provider dont remember...
Hope this information will be useful to someone in future using Sync/Async bridge

SOAP to JMS using Sync/Async bridge - configuration confirmation needed

Hi group,
Since I'm experincing error in a scenario using sync/async bridge in jms adapter I really would like a confirmation on my configuration.
For a simple SOAP to JMS scenario is it then correct that all I need is;
1) 2 synchronous message interfaces, 1 inbound and 1 outbound
2) 1 Receiver determination
3) 1 Interface determination
4) 1 Receiver agreement (JMS adapter with module configuration)
5) 2 Sender agreements (in my case 1 soap and 1 JMS adapter - the later with module configuration).
6) The sender and receiver JMS adapters point to different MQ queues (request and response queues)
7) The sender agreement for the JMS adapter uses my synchronous, inbound message interface (isn't this really just a "dummy" to actually fetch data from response queue - meaning that the actual utilized business system/service, MI and namespace are unimportant, since the module will make the adapter notify the listening module in the receiver JMS adapter?)
Best Regards,
Daniel

Hi, thanks for your reply.
I'm familiar with the links provided. I believe everything is configured as it should be, but since I get error I would like to have my configuration confirmed. Neither the weblog (or SAP guide) are detailed enough to convince me 100% that my configuration is correct. Surely the problem could be on the MQ side, but before going into that, I want to be sure that its not on XI-side.
So I really would like confirmation on the steps/question that I wrote:-)
Best Regards,
Daniel

Sync-async bridge doubts ...

Hi everyone.
I've developed a sync async bridge fro this scenario ..
sync abap proxy (request) -
> XI -
> abap proxy (BW response)
I've developed the BPM as XI pattern about sync-async bridge.
Problem is that i don't have the configuration part of the patern so that's what i've done.
i have a business service as sender, that. This BPM has a transformation step between the receive step that opens the bridge and the send step that closes the bridge.
i have a receiver determination with business service as sender and BPM as receiver.
when i test the scenario i get the error that no receiver determination found.
i need some help for this.
Regards,
Inigo.

Hi,
For the ABAP proxy as the sender you should not use a business service, You need to create a WebAsABAP bsuiness system pointing to your Client of the R3 system and use this as the sender service.
If you have done this, check the details of the message in MONI.What is the Sender Service, Sender Interface and sender Namespace. have you create the Receiver Determination for these values?
Regards
Bhavesh

Dynamic configuration in Sync/Async bridge in JMS

Hi
Scenario:
Portal sending request to JMS MQ and getting Response using sync/Async Bridge.
I have to written a UDF which will capture the value for cust_uid from request mapping and store it in dynamic configuration
And when the response comes from JMS MQu2026.this value gets populated in response mapping.
I have tested the UDF in a dummy Soap2rfc scenario and its working fine.
But when used in Sync/Async Bridge, the dynamic configuration fails.
For Sync/Async Bridge, there are 2 channels 1) Sender JMS 2) receiver JMS.
The synchronous request is converted to an asynchronous request in the module processor and sent.
The asynchronous system sends a response to a sender adapter. In the module processor of the sender adapter, this response is forwarded to the module processor of the original receiver adapter, where it is sent as a synchronous response of the waiting synchronous request.
Please suggest
Regards
Abhijit

Hi Abhijit,
Okay, so your data extraction/insertion is working fine for a simple synchronous request responser call.
I suppose this is working fine because your receiver adapter copies some part of the request message (at least the dc header) to the response message. (But I don't think this always works for all the adapter types). It is not working for the sync-async bridge because there are two unrelated messages in this case.
In order to copy the dc header from the first message to the second message, I think you can use the DynamicConfiguraitionBean module to store the dc header value in the module data and use this module again to recover it and set it to the second message. The whole process is somewhat complicated, but I will sketch the approach below.
First, let's call the first use of DCB the store step and the second the recover step. These store and recover steps must take place in the same module sequence so that they can use the module data to pass data from the first message to the second message. Furthermore, the store step must occur after the cust_id value is extracted into the dc header. So, your configuration must be placed in the receiver adapter side. Assuming the request message with the filled dc header coming into the module sequence, the first DCB module can be placed before the ROB module to store the dc header value in the module data. And the second DCB module can be placed after the WRB module to recover the dc header value from the module data and set it the dc header of the response message.
I hope this will work.
Regards, Yza

Error Handling of Sync/Async Bridge

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for