Error in a KO88 processing - Settlement from order to AuC

Hi Experts,
I am trying to settle an order using the transaction KO88 and the system give me the following message :
Message Text
Acquisition value negative in area 01.
Technical Data
Message type__________ E (Error)
Message class_________ AA (Messages for Asset Accounting)
Message number________ 617
Message variable 1____ 01
Message variable 2____ 
Message variable 3____ 
Message variable 4____ 000000040053-0000
\i need to know how to correct that and settle the order, \i finished the settlement for more than 100 order and only this ones has error
Regards,
Marcos

Hi,
I have faced this issue earlier. You have 2 options in this case.
Option 1 : As Ajay said, change the config to allow negative book value in the depn area. However i don't suggest the same because this will do away with an important validation , that the book value should never be negative. This happened only in exception  cases.
Option 2 : You should mark the Asset master to allow negative values in the Tab Depn areas. Double click on the Depn area, and check the option " Negative values allowed ". With this, only for the asset, negative values are allowed. In case you don't see this field, you need to change screen layout rule so that the field is visible.
Please note once you check the negative values allowed option in the asset master, you cannot change it once you settle the Asset.
You should check the negative values allowed indicator for the AUC concerned.
Njoy
Siva

Similar Messages

  • Asset Value Date determination during settlement from Orders or WBS!

    Hi,
    I have a scenario on the asset value date and I am not sure what went wrong, asset side or CO side.
    The scenario is as following:
    1. Asset was converted into the system by 7/31/2008 with $10000.
    2. The capitalized on date is 2/29/2008 on the asset master data.
    3. On 8/31/ 2008, I charged $300 to an internal order and settled the $300 to this asset. The Asset Value Date on the Asset Explorer is 8/15/2008.
    4. On 9/30/2008, I charged #500 to the same internal order and settled the $500 to this asset, the Asset value date on the asset explorer for this charge is still 8/15/2008.
    This messed up the depreciation of this asset. Does anyone know how to control the asset value date from the settlement? Do we need to config in Asset side or in Order side? I want the $300 charge's value date is on 8/15/2008 and $500 value date on 9/15/2008. Is this possible?
    Thanks,
    Ting

    In the settlement you can fill in the asset values date.
    The first posting is the basis for capitalization date(when you don't fill it in manual), when you fill it in for the second time the Asset Value Date it is no longer relefant.
    This is only important when you have say in your depreciation key that the depreciation is based on days( see the help on this field)

  • Error in idoc foreground processing (FB01) from SBWP Inbox

    Hi all
    I m trying to process the idocs in my inbox.I m encountering a problem that it process only one idoc and while trying to process any more from there it doesnot process in foreground and gives only the message that:-
    <b>"Two accounts were transferred but not BSEG-HKONT"</b>
    Description of msg:-
    <i>Message no. F8 020
    Diagnosis
    Two accounts were transferred but not BSEG-HKONT.
    This error also occurs if more than 1000 line items are transferred. In this case, the transferred data must be distributed across several documents.</i>
    Now if i logoff the screen and again go to inbox,it again allows me to process any of the records only once.
    What should i do,if i want to process as many record i want from the inbox one after other without the need to logoff from inbox.
    Any clue will be appreciated.
    Regards
    DhanyaR Nair

    Hi,
    If you check the message B1 and message 120 has been used in 3 function modules
    here all are pointing to RCVPRT and partner type LS
    1. COMMUNICATION_IDOC_CREATE
      if idoc_created is initial and
       idoc_control-rcvprt = partner_type_ls_c.
        message a120(b1) with idoc_control-rcvprt
                        idoc_control-rcvprn
                        idoc_control-rcvpfc
                        idoc_control-mestyp
           raising receiver_not_authorized.
      endif.
    2. MASTER_IDOC_DISTRIBUTE
        elseif communication_idoc_control-rcvprt = partner_type_ls_c.
          message a120(b1) with communication_idoc_control-rcvprt
                          communication_idoc_control-rcvprn
                          communication_idoc_control-rcvpfc
                          communication_idoc_control-mestyp
            raising error_in_idoc_control.
        endif.
    3. ALE_IDOC_PROCESS_ERROR_OUT
        elseif resulting_idoc_control-rcvprt = partner_type_ls_c.
          message a120(b1) with resulting_idoc_control-rcvprt
                          resulting_idoc_control-rcvprn
                          resulting_idoc_control-rcvpfc
                          resulting_idoc_control-mestyp.
        endif.
    aRs

  • Settle from Orders to Orders (SKF's)

    Hello all,
    i would like to distribute from one internal order to another using statistical key figures. Is this possible?
    Is possible to do this automatically, i mean, for lots of orders, creating settlement hierarchies, and so on?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    No, it's not possible. You can apply settelemnt rule from the orders, but it has no functionality of basing the output on SKF or other complicated triggers; only percentage and amounts are available.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • WBS element is updated while settling cost from WBS to AUC

    Hi Experts
    At the time of settlement , when we settling the cost from WBS to AUC , WBS element is updated in AUC line item of accounting document , but it should not be updated actually.
    As result AUC cost is loaded on WBS and budget of WBS is get affected , furthermore system is not allowing for MIGO even budget is available but in CJ30 it is showing assigned value is more then original budget.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks & Regards
    shailesh

    Hi Saurabh ,
    I totally agree with you , but in our case system is not allowing(Error Message: Budget Exceeded) MIGO against capex PO - > WBS.
    Note : in our case , system is checking budget at the time of MIGO also.
    in our case , report  S_ALR_87013558 is showing wrong actual value and  also in CJ30 , total assigned value is larger then total distributable budget , As result our available budget gets negative figure in report S_ALR_87013558 , even i have already run CJEN->CJBN 2 or 3 times.
    Note: Our Commitment value is correct.
    Actually , according to report S_ALR_87013542 , system is showing correct actual value , that means we have sufficient available budget for further MIGO's
    Now may be , due to WBS element is updated in AUC line item of accouning document of settlement (WBS to AUC) , system loads AUC values to WBS unnecessarily , our available budget gets negative figure.
    For your reference , i am attaching screen shot of accounting document which is generated at the time of settlement from WBS to AUC.

  • Secondary cost from WBS to AUC

    Hi All,
    I am facing a problem in posting secondary costs from WBS to AUC.
    In Project systems they are considering secondary costs from the activities in the network. i settled the cost from network to WBS. and when i tried to settle From wbs to AUC system is asking for settlement costelement for secondary cost. But the secondary cost should be settled to costcenter but not to AUC.
    Please suggest how can we do the settlement from WBS to AUC. How to handle settlement of secondary costs in this scenario.
    Any help will be greatly appriciated.
    Rgds,
    Kumar.

    Through MM, contract is created (ME31N) whereby the settlement G/L accounts are identified.
    The contract then is released through MM with TCode ME21N which prompts Commitment Costs to be entered, after which the Service Entry Sheet SES through TCode ME81L which then automatically updates into the WBS.
    Through WBS, CJ88 would be the TCode you would have to use for settlement.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks.

  • Error while settling internal order KO88 / KO8G)

    Hi Friends,
    We are in ECC5.0
    I have an expense G/L account. Cost center and Business Area are mandatory to post in to this G/L account.
    I posted some transactions to this G/L account with Business Area, Cost center and Internal order values in the document. When I try to settle this internal order to AUC, I am getting error 'Cost center is mandatory for G/L account xxxxxx'.
    I am not sure, why it is not picking the cost center and Business Area from the original document. Please could any one advice me?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Waman and Ajay,
    Thanks for your information.
    Sorry to ask a basic question:
    while we run the settlement, will  G/L entry have a cost center in the document?
    If I have a debit line in expense G/L with cost center cc1 and order or1, when I settle this order, it will post a credit entry. But I am not sure if this credit entry will have cost center in that line?
    If yes, how will be the entry for multiple debit lines with multiple costcenters? Because, when we settle the G/L, it will post only one line item as credit for the total amount.
    Please could you help me in understanding?
    Thanks,

  • Process order settlement driven by T030 & TKA3C vs settlement from recipe

    We settle all process order cost (consumption, production, and variances) to the cost center (or P&L).   These settlements are driven by a hard coded structure (by valuation class) and tables T030 & TKA3C.
    I suggest that this is not common SAP practice.  This is certainly not SAP best practice.   I believe this has resulted in the proliferation of valuation classes and cost elements (in order to settle production differently.)   Does it make sense to have over 300 valuation classes?   Can you please confirm?
    I suggest that we only need to settle production order variances and activity cost!  The correct settlement should be defined as part of the resource (and recipe group).   We already define this but they have no consequence because of the configuration of our SAP.  Should settlement should be recipe driven and not material driven!  It would not mater what the valuation class of the consumed materials, or the produced materials.  Settlement would be defined by the resource attached to the recipe. 
    How does SAP overide the resource (cost center), and activity (cost center) attached to the recipe with tables T030 & TKA3C?

    The forum [FPM - General|Enterprise Performance Management (SAP EPM); in which you originally posted your question deals mainly with the financial performance applications otherwise known as Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) carrying the BusinessObjects brand.   Your question pertains to SAP [ERP Financials Controlling|SAP ERP Financials - Controlling; which is covered by another forum.  Therefore your message has been moved.  Please adjust any bookmarks you might have and post to the appropriate area in the future, that way you are assured you will have the right audience reading your posts.
    Thanks and best regards,
    [Jeffrey Holdeman|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/profile/Jeffrey+Holdeman]
    SAP Labs, LLC
    BusinessObjects Division
    Americas Applications Regional Implementation Group (RIG)

  • Error in Settlement production order

    Hi,
    I am facing follow error when try to settled production order in KO88.
    There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible
    Message no. KD256
    Diagnosis
    The sender has a results analysis key, but no accrued values.
    Either the accrual was not yet started for the sender, or the values to be settled from the accrual equal zero.
    Note
    Actual costs are only settled once the sender is technically completed or finally delivered.
    This applies to
    Projects that cannot carry revenues
    In Service Management for sales order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in sales order production) set in the accrual version for
    Production orders
    Internal orders with no revenues
    Orders with no revenues
    In Service Management for engineer-to-order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in engineer-to-order production ) set in the accrual version for
    Internal orders with no revenues
    Orders with no revenues
    In Service Management to the indicator (Calculate WIP for internal and service orders with no revenues) set in the accrual version for
    Internal orders with no revenues
    Orders with no revenues
    To the indicator (Calculate WIP for production orders without settlement to material) set in the accrual version for
    Production orders without settlement to material
    Procedure
    1. If necessary, start the accrual calculation for the sender
    2. Restart settlement
    Raja.

    Hi AP,
    First of all thanks for you are paying continue attention on my thread.
    I have checked in production order that goods are issued against the production orders and costs are captured.
    When I run KKAX,facing following error.Hope you can solve this.
    There are values for cost element 50200000 that are not assigned to any line ID
    Message no. KJ161
    Diagnosis
    Not all values for the cost element are assigned to a line ID.
    Procedure
    Assign the cost element to a line ID. If you don't want to include the cost element in results analysis, assign it to a line ID of category N.
    You can access a detailed list of unassigned cost elements as follows: Start results analysis in the individual processing mode (transaction KKA1, KKA2, or KKA3). Select the field Full log. Execute the function. On the next screen, choose Logs -> Parameter List in the menu. A list is generated. The unassigned values are shown at the end of the list.
    If cost element "+++++++++" was shown in the message, this is because in the assignment of costs and revenues to line IDs, you have not used a cost element other than the full masking "+++++++++". In this case a presummarization eliminates the information on the cost element.
    Raja.

  • Results Analysis Settle Internal Order (from CRM) - No cost element allowed

    In SPRO results analysis configuration to "Define Posting Rules for Settlement to Financial Accounting" I am not allowed to use an account with a cost element.  (Error: I get error KQ 119 G/L account ### cannot be created as a cost element.)
    I configure a G/L account with no cost element.  KO88 Settlement posts to G/L account fine; however, does not post to the internal order because the config mentioned on first line does not allow me to use an account with a cost element. 
    Problem: I am unable to see settlement in KOB1 report because settlement goes to GL Account, but does not post to the internal order.
    Failed solution:  I tried to use OKC9 substitution at KO88 to substitute the internal order number.  The problem is that table AUFKV is empty when the substitution runs at KO88 settlement.  I am not able to substitute the order number because the order number isn't even available in the substitution at internal order settlement.
    I put a break manual break point in program GBTACCOB at the call to the substitution rule I defined.  The breakpoint stops at the substitution when I run KO88 settlement; however, fields are blank. I am unable to do substitution.  I know this works because I have a similar substitution on the same internal order for accounting indicator when doing an MB1A goods issue to an internal order.  The break point stops there and the AUFKV data is available for substitution rule.
    Question:
    Any suggested solutions to to have internal order update into KO88 settlement after KKA1 results analysis would be helpfull.

    It is more of a reporting issue really. 
    The problem is that internal order settlement with settlement profile instead of results analysis does post the settlement to the internal order and does use a cost element.  This is the business process the users currently have.  Our users have a requirement to settle the orders weekly.  This helps them find issues earlier and speeds up the month end close.
    In the past we could use KOB1 and see the current balance of an internal order and see the settlement.  Now that report no longer shows the settlement.  How can I see what has been settled on an order and what hasn't now?

  • Error in settlement of IO to AUC through T-code KO88

    Hi All,
    I created 3 Internel order for 3 wings(Building floor).While i am doing settlement by T-Code KO88 from INTERNAL ORDER to AUC the following error is acquring " EITHER THE SENDER IS ALREADY SETTLED, OR THERE IS NOTHING TO SETTLE". But i checked the balance in internal order, i can see all the entries are available.
    Can any help me in this please.
    regards,Dhanu
    Edited by: dhanusapfi on Oct 10, 2009 5:07 PM

    Hi,
    Your order is not statistical because you cannot maintain settlement rule for statistical order.
    Even you see all the entries are displayed, can you check the order balance?
    KO03 > Extras > Order Balance
    The message informs you that the settlement is done, and there is no balance.
    If you need to know when the settlement is done, please check the settlement rule > First used & Last used field.
    You can also check the cost analysis as below to see the cost movement for order.
    KO03 > Extras > Cost Analysis

  • Error while executing the reversal in KO88 for an internal order

    Hi Experts,
    I am getting  the below error while doing the Actual settlement : order reverse through t code KO88. we are currently using the SAP ECC 5.0 and i found the SAP notes 215944 and 335428, which are upto release 4.6C.
    System error - deletion not possible
    Message no. AAPO186
    i can see that the doc has generated for the settlement and for reversal it is giving the error. Can some one help me who has faced this type of problem earlier.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Venkat

    Hi,
    Additionally, try to check 300273 note.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Mass processing for inbound orders idoc's from file

    Hi Experts,
    I have an requirement wherein we need to process all the ORDERS idocs sent from a thrid party system to a particular folder in the SAP system. Now we use a custom programme which in turn calls fn module IDOC_INBOUND_FROM_FILE to process each file. Here if the fn. module IDOC_INBOUND_FROM_FILE hits an erroneous file (control record error) it issues abend message which causes to entire programme to exit leaving rest of the files in the folder unprocessed.
    Let me know if there is any other function module or way to tackle this issue so as to process all the files.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jimmy.

    Add the exception ERROR_MESSAGE = 99 (or some other unique number) to the standard exceptions in the function module call in your custom program.  This will allow you to trap the error and continue processing.

  • Error message "order currently being processed" in print order thru IW37N

    Hi,
    I am getting error messages "order currently being proceesed by same user" & " material reservation for order being processed" when i am trying to take print of work order using t-code IW37N putting multiple orders. But I am able to take print then also. I am not able  to understand why this message is coming before print comes out..I have not opened any more same transaction also on the screen.
    I am getting this error message very frequently for other open orders also.
    Plse suggest what can be the reason ?
    Regards,
    Vivek

    Apart from standard shop papers selection 2010, 2020, 2030 if you define new like 3030 or 4040 and assigned with any custom program to print server system will issue this message.
    Please check the standard config via transaction OIDF
    Thanks
    S.N

  • Sales Order processing - Sale from stock

    Dear Gurus,
    What are the configuration steps involved in Sales Order Processing- Sales from Stock.
    Kindly let me know.
    Regards
    Prashant Ranalkar

    Go with Make To Stock scenario.  For configuration details, make a search in this forum.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

Maybe you are looking for