Error in CUP assigning Firefighter id

Dear All,
I am receiving an error "Assign a valid flag I, U OR X"
i was able to assign the firefighter before and now all of a sudden its throwing me this error.
I am SAP GRC SP 12

Hi Dylan,
When this error occured we were on VIRSANH 12 and VIRSAHR 10 in the backend. But we eventually have upgraded the system to SP 13 because there were lots of issues in RAR.
For your information another interesting thing which happened was initially when we configured firefighter ids on SP12 it worked fine for few weeks. Then all of a sudden the ids started giving an errors for which we have two SAP notes
1143955
1319031
I understand that these notes have to applied from SP7 onwards for all support packs. But the reason why we are still scratching our heads is that why this error did not occur in the first place itself.
Also, another question is it advisable to have the individual components on different support packs for eg. RAR SP13
CUP SP12. SAP says its not advisable.
Whats your opinion?

Similar Messages

Error while updating assignment of Contingent resource

Hi,
I am getting the below error while updating Assignment of contingent resource using the Standard API.
ORA-20001: HR_7949_ASG_DIF_SYSTEM_TYPE: N, SYSTYPE, ACTIVE_CWKCode for updating the record is -
Declare
Cursor c_emp_mig
Is
Select person_id, supervisor_person_id, code_comb_id, sob, assignment_id, assignment_number From customContingentTable;
x_person_id number;
x_validate BOOLEAN := FALSE;
x_supervisor_id number;
x_default_code_comb_id number;
x_set_of_books_id number;
x_assignment_id number;
x_assignment_number varchar2(20);
x_manager_flag char(1):='N';
x_comment_id number;
x_concatenated_segments varchar2(80);
x_no_managers_warning boolean ;
x_cagr_concatenated_segments VARCHAR2(80);
x_soft_coding_keyflex_id NUMBER; --- IN OUT
x_other_manager_warning boolean;
x_object_version_number NUMBER;
x_cagr_grade_def_id NUMBER;
x_effective_date DATE :='01-OCT-2011'; --cut off date from which the assignment will be effective
x_effective_start_date DATE :='01-OCT-2011';--cut off date from which the assignment will be effective
x_effective_end_date   DATE;
x_hourly_salaried_warning boolean;
x_org_now_no_manager_warning boolean;
x_error_code varchar2(240);
x_error_desc varchar2(2000);
Begin
   Open c_emp_mig;
   Loop
   Fetch c_emp_mig Into x_person_id, x_supervisor_id, x_default_code_comb_id, x_set_of_books_id, x_assignment_id, x_assignment_number;
   Exit when c_emp_mig%NOTFOUND;
    x_object_version_number:=1;
    hr_assignment_api.update_cwk_asg(
     p_validate => x_validate
     ,p_effective_date => x_effective_date
     ,p_datetrack_update_mode => 'UPDATE'
     ,p_assignment_id => x_assignment_id
     ,p_assignment_status_type_id => 1
     ,p_assignment_number =>x_assignment_number
     ,p_object_version_number => x_object_version_number
     ,p_default_code_comb_id => x_default_code_comb_id
     ,p_set_of_books_id => x_set_of_books_id
     ,p_supervisor_id=>x_supervisor_id
     ,p_manager_flag=>x_manager_flag
     ,p_concatenated_segments => x_concatenated_segments
     ,p_soft_coding_keyflex_id => x_soft_coding_keyflex_id
     ,p_comment_id => x_comment_id
     ,p_effective_start_date => x_effective_start_date
     ,p_effective_end_date => x_effective_end_date
     ,p_no_managers_warning => x_no_managers_warning
     ,p_other_manager_warning => x_other_manager_warning
     ,p_hourly_salaried_warning=>x_hourly_salaried_warning
     ,p_org_now_no_manager_warning=>x_org_now_no_manager_warning
      End Loop;
   Exception When Others Then
         x_error_code:=SQLCODE;
         x_error_desc:=SQLERRM;
        insert into emp_mig_error(error_code, error_desc) values(x_error_code, x_error_desc);
     Close c_emp_mig;
End;   Am I missing something here? I searched in metalink, there is no mention of this error. Can anyone help?
Regds,
ARS

The relevant parameter to identify an individual will be p_assignment_id.
You will need a query to obtain the relevant assignment_id from the given CWK number on the person row
Edited to add : whilst you are about it, you'll need to obtain the assignment object_version_number as well - that will be needed for the p_object_version_number parameter
Edited by: clive_t on 05-Apr-2012 16:10

Error V1134, account assignment error during PO creation

Hello All,
I am facing one issue while creating a purchase order w.r.t. PR. My scenario is mentioned below...
1) A sales order is created for a part w.r.t. quantity contract
2) PR is created w.r.t. a sales order
3) I am trying to create a purchase order w.r.t. PR however while creating PO, system is giving following error
Error: V1134, Account assignment cannot be carried out because of different origin no.
Can you please help me figure out why system is giving error and how to resolve this.
Thanks in advance.
With regards.
Sanjay

Hello Arminda,
Thank you for your prompt response. However, I have one doubt, this note is applicable up to ECC 5.00 and we are working on SAP ECC 6.0 version. Can this note be applicable to us.
Please revert.
Thank you again.
With regards.
Sanjay

Purchase Order Error in account assignment

Hi all,
I am running SRM 7.0 Extended Classic scenario for the creation of purchase orders.
Purchase Orders are correctly created in SRM and passed to ECC in our DEV system. But in our QAS system we are getting the following error in SRM Purchase Order:
BBP_PD 822 Error in account assignment for item 1
Any idea what I am missing in the QAS system?
Thanks
Ezequiel

Hi Jay, thanks for the explanation,
From our customer message SAP answered us that the error is coming from a Finance Validation that is checking that the field Segment (COBL-SEGMENT) in the Account assignment is filled with a value.
The call stack is the following:
13          FUNCTION     BBP_PD_MSG_ADD     SAPLBBP_PDH_MSG
12          FORM     COBL_CHECK_ALL     SAPLBBP_PDACC
11          FORM     ACCOUNT_MAINTAIN_ALL_RECORDS     SAPLBBP_PDACC
10          FORM     ACCOUNT_F_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PDACC
9          FUNCTION     BBP_ACCOUNT_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PDACC
8          FORM     ITEM_F_CHECK_FROM_WTAB     SAPLBBP_PDIAD
7          FORM     ITEMLIST_F_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PDIAD
6          FUNCTION     BBP_ITEMLIST_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PDIAD
5          FORM     PROCDOC_DB_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PD
4          FORM     PROCDOC_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PD
3          FUNCTION     BBP_PROCDOC_CHECK     SAPLBBP_PD
2          FORM     DISPLAY_DOCUMENT     BBP_PD
1          EVENT     ATUSER-COMMAND     BBP_PD
In form COBL_CHECK_ALL, error message is coming from calling function 'META_ACCSERV_CHECKACCASSIGNMT'
CALL FUNCTION 'META_ACCSERV_CHECKACCASSIGNMT'
    EXPORTING
      logical_system = p_com-logsys_fi
    TABLES
      bbp_cobl        = t_cobl
      exp_cobl        = t_new_cobl                    "note 202684
      return          = t_return
      control_record = control_record.
I think we have two ways to solve it:
1. If we manage to deactivate somehow this error in SRM, then when PO is generated the value will be mapped from PR in ECC.
2. This field Segment is not available in customizing for account assignments for SRM (table BBP_V_C_ACCFC). Is it any way to have it in SRM?
Can you suggest please,
Many thanks,
Thanks,
Ezequiel

In COGI error text "Multiple assignment of line item"

Hi Guru,
In COGI error text "Multiple assignment of line item"
Description:
ultiple assignment of a line ID
   Message no. M7357
iagnosis
   An item table, in which the line ID (LINE_ID)
   was transferred to the function module MB_CRE
ystem Response
   Processing is terminated.
rocedure
   Contact the system administration.
rocedure for System Administration
   There is an error in the calling application.
Please help me to resolved this issue.
Thanks and regards
PNU

Hi,
Thanks for reply,
It is possible to remove material from COGI list. We need to stop creation of this error.
Is there other solution to control creation of error "Multiple assignment of line item"
Thanx & regd.
PNU

Error:System not assigned to a host

Hi,
I am trying to download maintenance stk SRM 7.0 SPS 5.0, via solman, but I am getting the error called "Error:System not assigned to a host" in the stage where solman looks for OS/DB dependent files.
When I go back and check the entries in SMSY, all the relevant entries are present there..
Could anyone has encountered this before?
Thanks
Abhishek

>
Abhi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to download maintenance stk SRM 7.0 SPS 5.0, via solman, but I am getting the error called "Error:System not assigned to a host" in the stage where solman looks for OS/DB dependent files.
> When I go back and check the entries in SMSY, all the relevant entries are present there..
> Could anyone has encountered this before?
>
> Thanks
> Abhishek
Hi Abhisek,
are you sure that is in TX "smsy -> Systems -> <your SID> -> logical Component -> Header Data" an entry at the field "message Server" ?
I think that is meant with host.
regards
Tobias

Srm User interface - change settings : Error in role assignment

Hi Gurus,
Users are facing issue when they are changing settings in the SRM user interface site .
Go to SRM user interface SIte --> Change my settings --> change date format or decimal format .
When they save it --> Gets an error - error in role assignment .
What can be the issue. It's same in Dev and qa .
Waiting for your reply.
Points will be rewared .
Thanks
Munish Kumar

Hello Munish,
Laurent Burtaire wrote:
If you do a where-used for message number i gave you, you will find two message calls in methods from /SAPSRM/CL_PDO_MO_USER_ACCOUNT class.
Put a break-point to check if one of them is done. Problem cannot be due to missing authorization as there is no data in SU53 for concerned user.
Regards.
Laurent.

Error in account assignment for item

Hello,
We have configured EBP at Stack 03 in SRM release 550
We are facing problem to create shopping cart,
Already it was working fine but now at the time of adding item to shopping cart it shows below error
messages
1.Version 0 is not defined for fiscal year 2007
2.Error in account assignment for item
For your reference error screen is given in attached document.
pls advise
Regards,
Santosh

Hi Christophe,
I am getting the same error <b>'Version 0 is not defined for fiscal year 2007'</b> when tried to create a Sales Order in IDES system and I am trying the solution to add the fiscal year 2007 in T.code OKEV but it fails.
The steps what I have done :
1. Go to OKEV
2. Selecting control area 1000
3. Selecting the version 0 line
4. then trying to open the Settings for Each fiscal year from Dialog Structure
The error i get is :
<b>E: Activation of the indicator is not permitted</b>
and the highlighted line in red is for Version 1
The default indicator is set for version 1 is Plan, WIP/RA, Variance & Legal Valuation (Valuation view)
I tried in many ways to 'uncheck' the boxes for this version 1 but fails.
Pls help.
regds,
Umesh

Error message "ABAP/4 error during dynamic assign" on Contact Log creation.

Hi,
We are getting an error message "ABAP/4 error during dynamic assign beyond program bounds" displayed while creating contact log using transaction "BCT0".
Please suggest what can be the cause of the error message and how we can remove this.
Regards,
Ankur

Dear Andrea,
The problem should be caused by obsolete entry in table TFAWX.
Please use the following report for deleting this entry (test before in your TEST System) :
report ztfawx_delete.
tables tfawx.
select single * from tfawx where prog = 'SAPLBAS0'
                            and bldgr = '0110'
                            and mnum = 23
                            and bfeld = '$GENERAL'.
if sy-subrc = 0.
delete tfawx.
endif.
Buona Giornata
Mauro

Issthe PO Error message *Account assignment mandatory for material

At the time of creating the PO after putting the material and plant I get the error message " *Account assignment mandatory for material 10000213". The plant for which i want to raise is 3004 which i have created recently and only in this plant this message is showing. Please help me out
Edited by: amitekum on Sep 17, 2010 12:34 PM

you should have searched sdn first for this
anyways it means that the in tcode OMS2.
you need to mark the check box quantity and value updation for the material type of your material in combinationwith your plant
it means this material is acting as consumable material

Error in account assignment with Asset

Hi Gurus,
I am trying to create a shopping cart with a valid Asset master but getting an error-
Transaction type does not exist
Error in account assignment for item 1
I can create a PR with this Asset number in ECC successfully without any error but the same Asset number is giving the above error in shopping cart
Regards
Kapil

HI
is the problem related only with asset number? or also with other account assignment?
than try to understand if the following table is correctly defined
SAP Supplier Relationship Management-SRM Server-Cross-Application Basic Settings-Account Assignment-Define Account Assignment Categories
than
SAP Supplier Relationship Management-SRM Server-Cross-Application Basic Settings-Account Assignment-Define G/L Account for Product Category and Account Assignment Category
regards
andrea

BUPA_MAIN BDOC Error AM 605 - Assignment of usage & to communication type &

Hi Experts,
In our ISU to CRM replication of the Business partner we are seeing lots of BDOC error AM 605 - Assignment of usage & to communication type & not unique.
I have figured that the error occurs when the CONSNUMBER in the ADR* table reaches 999. Therefore, no more entries can be added for the communication type (ie another phone number) for that particular address number.
But the behaviour in our case is such that CONSNUMBER is reaching 999 by skiping many numbers ( i am not sure if thsi is the standard behavior or something is wrong), so its not the consistent behaviour. In some cases it suddely skips the CONSNUMBER range say which is at 400 for particular address number and goes to 990 range and reaches 999, the BDOC errors out.
We applied note 1070798 - Repair the consnumber in communication tables. The program Z_OSSNOTE_1070798 will be run to reorganize the consnumber, so no entry is at 999. Although this reorganies the number but this only acts as a fix after the error is already encountered.
We still see the AM 605 error , can any one please suggest is there any way to avoid this BDOC Error from occuring. We see these error in case of organisation BPs having many addresses and their phone number in table ADR2 CONSNUMBER reaches 999.
Immediate help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jessica

Hi Jessica,
Were you able to fix this issue of fill all required entries error?
i have a same error with my project too.
Yes, you know me. We worked in the same project earlier, now i am in this new project, where i get the same old error.
Thanks
Keerthi

Error in CUP " Role Search" type of access as transaction

Hello
This has been talked about for a Role in this thread.
Error in CUP " Role Search"
When the approver want to select an Role by clicking the select role tab and then select the type of access as transaction I get No Records Found.
I do get when I select the type of access as Roles. The above thread has helped me in resolving that.
Please help me with this. I am stuck.
Thanks

Just to add that
In CUP-> Configuration->Roles--->Search Roles
When I click on the Roles I can see the associated transaction.
But When I create a Request-----> Select roles and then Select the access type as transaction.
I dont see any of that
Any help regarding this. Now sure why those transactions are not pulled.
Thanks

Error in Class Assignment in Pool Asset Managment

Hello Team,
I am facing problem in IW21 during creation Notification type MF which is used for Pool Asset Management. if possible give me solution
After Click on Equipment below window will open
and in this window if i do next, no processing will happened. If i wish to save this notification system will give error Like Error in Class Assignment.
I checked entries in PAMS_FSET table also.
Thanks and Regards,
Sweta

Hi , Please check whether class PAM is defined for class type PAM in CL02 . If it is not defined please maintain some characters in it.
Regards,

ABAP/4 error during dynamic assign beyond program bounds

Hi experts,
after an Upgrade from 4.7 to Ecc 6.0, launching transaction AC03 an error (green light) occours "ABAP/4 error during dynamic assign beyond program bounds".
Is there anyone who find a solution?
regards
andrea brescia
Edited by: andrea brescia on Nov 30, 2010 1:42 PM

Dear Andrea,
The problem should be caused by obsolete entry in table TFAWX.
Please use the following report for deleting this entry (test before in your TEST System) :
report ztfawx_delete.
tables tfawx.
select single * from tfawx where prog = 'SAPLBAS0'
                            and bldgr = '0110'
                            and mnum = 23
                            and bfeld = '$GENERAL'.
if sy-subrc = 0.
delete tfawx.
endif.
Buona Giornata
Mauro

Error in CUP assigning Firefighter id

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for