Error in Excise reconciliation
Hi expert
1. have generated Sub contracting challan, but while doing reconciliation shows error as there is no 543 for material.
2.error is Excise reconciliation shows error 543 qty exceeds than the 541Qty( In the Bom i have taken more QTY then the Finished QTY) my finshed Qty is 100. Roh is 200.
REGARD
Hello,
Please check the process supported by SAP for
subcontracting with and without duty payment in the following link:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60/helpdata/en/09/ebf138cdd78a4be10000000
a114084/frameset.htm
It is quite helpful for challan reconciliation issues.
Keep in mid that for challan subcontrating you should perform the
following steps:
1) Create Sub contracting PO
2) Create MB1B ( 541 mov)
3) Create Challan from J1IF01 with reference to material document
4) Create GR using MIGO sub cont PO. ( faced error )
Please be ensure that the following note is already applied in your
system:
1423896 - The subcontracting challan validation - MIGO
Please also check how you are defining the movement type configuration.
Please check:
if you have set the movement types 541 and 541 O as relevant for creation of challan.
if you have set the number of line items in a challan to be only 1 in the customizing node 'subcontracting attributes'.
In this case, the system will create 1 challan per line of the transfer posting
document as it finds both 541 and 541 O movements.
If you do not want the system to create challan for 541 as is normal
then remove the movement type 541 from movement type group 0001. Also
remove 101 from movement type group 0002.
I hope it helps you.
Regards,
Fábio Almeida
MM consultant
Similar Messages
-
Error in excise JV debiting RG23C basic+Cess to RG23C cenvat on hold
pl Hi experts
Facing below error in excise JV
XXXXXX G/L account is not identified in the General Ledger Master
Steps
J1IH-Other Adjustment
Modvat a/c selection:RG23C
On clicking Determination of GL account following GL a/c are appearing
RG23C Basic ED Dr
RG23C Cess Dr
RG23C S Cess Dr
Cenvat clearing Cr
When I am replacng Cenvat clearing GL with RG23C Cenvat on Hold above error is there i.e.
XXXXXX G/L account is not identified in the General Ledger Master
Pl help where is the issue as G/L of RG23C Cenvat on Hold is required to be debited
thanks in advanceCan you post the message number ?
Also your post related to excise, you should choose correct forum..
cc Jyoti Sir.
Regards
Dev -
Error: Basic excise duty or excise duty base value is zero
Hi all,
Error: Basic excise duty or excise duty base value is zero in sale invoice. Please give the solution for this issue.
Thanks,
SD User.Hi,
j1id and condition record has been maintained. SD pricing procedure v/08 is maintained condition type jexp (basic excise duty) but still we are facing same error. Please give me solution for this issue.
Regards,
SAP Sd USER -
Hi Guru,
We have created new excise group in SPRO> tax on goods movement/India>basic setting>maintain excise group successfully.
My problem is, when we have update the number range (J1I9) for same excise group, system give the error message Excise group .... does not exist.
Please help on top priority.
Regards
BK GAIKWADSir,
i have allready updated the same & also one thing is more, i have aal the above chnages in development server & then transport the same request to quality server.
in development server it is work fine only in quality server it is not display. please help
Regards
BK GAIKWD -
Hi friends,
I am having following error while saving the excise invoice.
Please help me....
No account is specified in item 0000000001
Message no. F5670
Diagnosis
No account was specified for account type "S" in item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.
System Response
The Financial Accounting program cannot process the document.
Procedure
A system error has probably occurred in the application you called up. Check the data transferred to item "0000000001" of the FI/CO document.
with regardsHi,
Maintain account determination for reconciliation posting (transaction OBYB). Specify the posting keys for general G/L account postings. Example:
Posting key 40: Debit posting
Posting key 50: Credit posting
check the business transaction and maintain require setting in OBYB
Thanks & Regards
phaneendra -
RFINDEX - Errors in section Reconciliation INDEX vs BSEG
Hi Experts,
After converting a normal GL account into OIM, we have executed the report RFINDEX for consistency check.
We have found errors in the section Reconciliation INDEX vs BSEG.
But I am not sure what exactly the system trying to make me understand and the list of documents that got affected.
Analysis log says that error msg appears at XBLNR field in BSEG & BSIS table.
However, we do not find the field in BSEG table. Then why the system is showing it as "error msg "?
May I request the forum to throw some light and route me towards solution for overcoming the issue?
Regards,
BSK..Hi Surya,
Please note first of all that the repair option in RFINDEX is only available for use SAP Support. We never recommend that customers or general systems users use this report in repair mode themselves. It can lead to further inconsistencies if used incorrectly.
The error you have seen on this account related to XBLNR is arising because there are differences in the values when comparing the contents of field BKPF-XBLNR and BSIS-XBLNR for a particular set of line items. The XBLNR field is in the header table BKPF and not BSEG.
This error is usually a non critical error and can occur when customising settings such as user exits, substitutions update the XBLNR field in one table (eg BKPF) but not in another (eg BSIS). In these types of situations we usually advise customers to first take time in understanding why the values are updated for XBLNR in their system; the field is highly customizable and therefore errors like this can often appear in systems when running RFINDEX. There is no bug in the standard system which causes these types of differences.
The good news is that this error has nothing to do with the open item management which you enabled. Otherwise you would see error messages like "XOPVW" etc. From your description it seems that the conversion to Open Item Management you did was successful.
Kind regards,
Declan -
Error of Excise Invoice in Consignment Issue billing document
The usual process of billing from excisable unit (with CIN) is as follows:
1. VA01 >2. VL01N(PGI)> 3. VF01 (Proforma Inv) --> 4. J1IIN (Excise Inv) --> 5. VF01 (Comm Inv)
While in non-Excisable unit the 3 & 4 steps are not required.
In Consignment Fill-up- The process is only upto Generation of Excise Invoice and order processing is complete. Excise Invoice in this case works as Excise Gate pass- just to let the material out of factory gates and no sales is booked.
Further, In consignment issue- the process should be like non-exciseable unit i.e. 1, 2 & 5 step only. While we are getting the error is coming at step no 5 (Excise Invoice no is missing !)
One more thing I want to ask:
During Consignment fill-up, movement type 631 is used - which removes the stock from storage location and put it in 'Consignment stock in the same plant. Now since the plant is declared as excisabel, probably it is asking for 'Excise invoice'. It means, there is one more step of material movement, before 'Issue' order- what could be it ??
Please help.
Praveen SinghThe correct process in consignment fillup process is
a) Create fillup Order (order type KB)
b) Create fillup Delivery (movement type 631)
c) Create F8 proforma
d) Create Excise Invoice referencing Proforma
a) Create Consignment Issue Order (Order type KE)
b) Create Issue Delivery (movement type 633)
c) Create Commercial Invoice (billing type F2)
In the second stage only, you need to create commercial invoice and not in the first stage as indicated by you.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
Error during excise invoice creation
Hi everybody
The user has accidently entered one more line item during delivery with qty "0" and value "0" along with a standard item with item cat "tan" which has value and qty. Subsequently he has done PGI, Billing and Release to accounting. So the system is taking the second line item with qty "0" as text item. . But while posting excise invoice wrt billing doc. using tcode J1IIN the system is throwing a error
"Customisation for plant missing in table plant settings" Message No 8I303, Diagnosis: The customisation details have not been maintained for this company.
So far we have done more than 10000+ invoices with excise posting without any error. This is the first time we are getting this error because of accidental entry of a second line item with qty "0" by the user..
Please help how to solve this error. The billing document cannot be cancelled because it has already reached the customer and he is going to make payment wrt billing doc.
ThanksHi Everyone
Thanks a lot for your responses.
As time was running out the only option was to delete the line item with "0" qty and value (item cat. tatx) at the table level. Once deleted there was no problem in creating excise invoice using tcode "JIIIN" wrt commercial invoice.
Though this is not SAP recommended best business practice, this option had to be taken or else we would not have been able to open the MM posting periods (mmpv) for the next month without closing all the entries for the previous month.
And if we do not open the mm posting periods we cannot goods issue for the next month.
Thanks & regards
satish -
Error while excise invoice creation thru J1IJ
Dear All,
Scenario: Stock transfer from Excise depo to other plant.
Problem :
Excise Invoice is not getting Generate in Transation J1IJ. i am getting following error
"Excise invoice selection not complete for the item 000010"
Also Please tell me the process , (STPO > Delivery > Invoice > Excise Invoice) is it correct ?
Thanks in advance
VishalHi ,
The process as below
1.Create STO ---Me21n
2.Delivery with reference to STO ---Vl10B/VL10D
3.Invoice proforma with reference to delivery--Vf01
4.Excise invoicewith reference to Proforma---J1iJ
Kindly check the excise duty is coming in the proforma invoice
Regards
Damu -
Error in excise invoice creation for differncial price invoice
Dear all,
When i am going to create outgoing excise invoice for differncial price invoice
i am having the error - "Reference document of 10006893 is not delivery document
Message no. 8I681"
Can somebody give me solution where to make settings in configration or else.
ArchanaKindly refer following SAP Note
Note 1251126 - Excise Invoice created for Billing document wrt Sales order
Symptom as suggested by the above SAP Note is:
In the scenario where billing document is created with reference to the Sales order, the reference document for billing document is not delivery and it is possible to create multiple billing documents wrt the same Sales Order.
In such a case, the excise invoice should not be allowed to be created with respect to such a billing document through the transaction J1IIN.
However, current the system is allowing excise invoice to be created wrt the first billing document for the sales order and then for the subsequent billing documents, the following error message is displayed - Modvat utilization done message no 8I 446. This is incorrect.
This note contains the corrections for not allowing the creation of the excise invoice for these billing documents.
Hope it assist your cause.
Thanks & Regards
JP -
ERROR IN EXCISE INVOICE GENERATION
HI
FRIENDS
when i am creating excise invoice ref to proforma invoice an error is coming--CUSTOMIZATION FOR DOCUMENT TYPE F8 MISSING IN TABLE BILLING TYPE REFERENCE.
How to resolve the error , here i am doing intra company stock transfer process . i.e plant belongs to same company code one is cutomer & othe vend
plz help
regards
ambarishDear Ambarish
Go to IMG Path -- Logistics-General --> Tax on Goods Movements --> India --> Basic Settings --> Business Transactions --> Outgoing Excise Invoice --> Assign Billing Type to Delivery Types.
In the above patch, you have to maintain F8 to your delivery type. Maintain the same and retry to create an excise invoice.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
Error in Excise Data subscreen in Material Master:Foreign Trade-Import Data
SAP Net Weaver ECC6.0
I have added the 'Excise data' subscreen in Material master 'Foreign trade IMport' and 'Foreign Trade Export' tab. But facing the following problem. please help.
There are two buttons called 'More' and 'PreVals' in that subscreen. If I click either of them, it gives an error message as below
"Record 21 MORE does not exist in table T133E
Message no. M3748"
and
"Record 21 J1PR does not exist in table T133E
Message no. M3748"
Kindly help what to doOK
Lets starts from first step.
Go to OMT3B
1. Copy 21 and make it 91
2. Then from left hand side select Data screens no 15 copy it and make it 91 - Z1
3. Then again go to left hand side Subscreens and copy 6 and make it 91 - 71 - z and assign screen no 2205 and add prograne as SAPLJ1I_MATERIAL_MASTER
save it
Then go to OMBt3E and copy 01 -* HERS * 12 and mahe it 01 -* ROHor FERT * 91 and save it and then check and revert back
regards -
Error During Excise invoice capture In J1IEX .
Dear All ,
While I am posting part 1 entry during MIGO ,and then in J1IEX trying to capture the excise invoice ,but system is giving error no : 8I565 : Excise Details are not maintanied for Vendor xxxxx.I have checked in J1ID ,there I have maintained Vendor Excise Indicator as 1 against that vendor .
Agaist same PO If I am capturing Excise invoice in MIGO no error is coming and I can post it in J1IEX .
But according to client They want only part one entry in MIGO and Capture and Post in J1IEX .
Can anybody let me know why this error is coming only in J1IEX capture and not in MIGO .
Regards
AbhijitHi,
u have to maintain the following details in J1ID under vendor excise details:
1> ECC NO.
2> EXCISE REGISTRATION NO.
3> EXCISE RANGE
4> CST NUMBER
5> LST NUMBER
6> PAN
7> EXCISE INDICATOR VENDOR (ALREADY MAINTAINED)
8> TYPE OF VENDOR.
regards
jash -
/4xx wage type error in Payroll Reconciliation Report - wta C941
We recently updated our 6.04 system to SP74. Now when we run a Payroll Reconciliation Report with wage type application C941, we get a hard error message as follows: "You must include the corresponding /4XX wage type". Also same error on CCW2 and TAXT wta.
I have checked table VC_596A_F and it has entries for Y401 - Y406, with corresponding entries for /401 through /406 for all the listed wta's above.
Any thoughts on what I could check next to find this problem solution? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
David DenmanWe recently updated our 6.04 system to SP74. Now when we run a Payroll Reconciliation Report with wage type application C941, we get a hard error message as follows: "You must include the corresponding /4XX wage type". Also same error on CCW2 and TAXT wta.
I have checked table VC_596A_F and it has entries for Y401 - Y406, with corresponding entries for /401 through /406 for all the listed wta's above.
Any thoughts on what I could check next to find this problem solution? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
David Denman -
Dear sir
We are giving following 2 cases regarding updation of data in the RG-1 Register :
CASE NO. 1) In case of Product Code : NST0071B041 0.33BFC71 55 .C.S4 R411 having 2 different sales Transactions in the Month of July u2013 2010, Reference Invoice Nos. are .90041513 dtd.02.07.2010 & Invoice No.90042572 dtd.20.07.2010 respectively.
a) Material Document No.4900920723 dt. qty = 1 No. which is of Re-sale.
b) Material Document No.4900943089 dt qty = 8 Nos. which is of Fresh sale.
*First transaction should not post in RG-1 Register as it is of R-e-sale and second Transaction should post to RG1 Register as this is belongs to Fresh Production.
Conclusion :* Physically 8 Nos. are dispatched and F.G. Stock is Zero, but same are appearing in book stock of RG-1 stock Register which is wrong as per Excise Rule.
CASE NO. 2) In case of Product Code LFT112MB006 u2013 5BFLF112M55 also having 2 different sales Transactions in the Month of July u2013 2010, Reference Invoice Nos. are.90042121 dtd.12.07.2010 & Invoice No.90042726 dtd. 24.07.2010 respectively.
a) Material Document No.4900932808 qty = 1 No. which is of Re-sale.
b) Material Document No.4900945651 qty = 1 Nos. which is of Fresh sale.Hello,
i am working on 3.5 version. details:
SAP_ABA 640 0015 SAPKA64015 Cross-Application Component
SAP_BASIS 640 0015 SAPKB64015 SAP Basis Component
PI_BASIS 2005_1_640 0005 SAPKIPYJ65 Basis Plug-In (PI_BASIS) 2005_1_640
SAP_BW 350 0015 SAPKW35015 Business Information Warehouse
BI_CONT 353 0006 SAPKIBIFP6 Business Intelligence Content
the fisc variant is getting populated with value V3.
i have installed the above mentioned variable and other similar variables which are giving the same error(brain 641).
Should i apply note 496679( which i found on service market place)?
Is it applicable to me considering my existing version?
thanks,
Maybe you are looking for
-
I edit a photo and when I click Save As, I get error message "Could not complete your request because of a program error." I exit Elements, try again, same error. In past I had this problem but it resolved when rebooted PC. This time, PC reboot
-
Is it possible for Firefox to show a preview pane in the file/image upload window?
I'm not sure if this forum is the correct place to start this conversation. Let me know if there is a more appropriate location. Anyway, some applications such as Gimp show an image preview in a pane on the right side of the file->open window. It wou
-
Need help regarding Value Object Concept in flex/java
I need to map the java objects to flex use value objects in flex. The problem is I have a class in java which is referring to another class and again that class referring another class. For instance Class A protected User user; Class User p
-
JavaFX Canvas : "fuzzy" lines compared to Swing
Hi, I would very much like to port my Swing application (that draws on a JComponent) to JavaFX. But to my dismay the JavaFX Canvas does not draw as sharp and thin lines as Swing does. Lines drawn with the same thickness is noticeably thicker (and "fu
-
Outlook Enterprise Calendar Entries on iPhone
Why do calendar entries that I originate in my Enterprise Outlook display as 1-day later on my iPhone 4S Ver 5.1.1? Example, Outlook travel dates 6/12-14 show up as 6/13-15 on iPhone Calendar. Is it likely that this is a problem with the Enterprise o