Error in FI Posting for J2IUN - Utilization

I am doing J2IUN (CENVAT Utilization)
I gave all the input and executed. It went in and i selected amount which needs to be paid.
Then i simulated it and its perfect. When i clicked on SAVE, it gave error:
Error in FI posting 20100721
Message no. 8I280
There is no explanation for this error. I checked OB52, periods are open.
Let me know the reason for not posting in FI

Hi,
Please check first the current open period for your company code in transaction MMRV.
And then open the next period sequentially in transaction MMPV, untill you reach period 10 (july in your case) is not opened.
Regards,
Gaurav

Similar Messages

Error in MIRO posting for credit memo in return PO

Dear Sir,
I have made a return PO for Vendor rejection.Then made a good return for the same with 161.Then post the excise return through JV J1IS. But when I am posting the Credit Memo for vendor system showing the Error - RG23D Part 2 has not been done yet.
But on the other hand the excise has been posted in J1IV and part 2 can be seen in material document in excise tab.
Then why system is showing the above said error. Please suggest for the same.
Regards,
Sandip Sahu
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Nov 17, 2011 10:42 PM

Hi
system showing the Error - RG23D Part 2 has not been done yet.
R u sure you are getting this error?
As per me in register Rg23D there is no Part2 concept it only update register RG23D with excise value and qty
Is your plant is Depot or dealer registration
please check your excise group and series group properly
Regards
kailas Ugale

Error in Transfer posting for movement type 303

Hi Sir,
I am getting following error while doing Transfer posting for movement type 303 thru BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE
Error in Function:
Order    not found or not permitted for Goods Movement.
I am passiing all mandatory parameter for it as per BAPI Documentaion in tcode BAPI
Transfer posting
Transfer posting without reference to a reservation
The following fields must be populated:
Material number
Plant
Storage location
Movement type
Movement indicator
Quantity in unit of entry
ISO code unit of measurement for unit of entry
If I am doing manually by MB1B tcode, it is successfully done.......here its not asking any ORDER No...
Please help me .........
Regards,
Krishan

I'm not sure what you're system set up is...   So I'd suggest looking at everything you enter on the screen and then checking to make sure you are passing all the information in the BAPI.
With that said our system does require posting date, and batch. You might check that.   Also check that you've included all the required information in the header.
Did you use the same data when you tried to process the BAPI that you used when you tried to do MB1B manually?

BAPI_INSPLOT_SETUSAGEDECISION Error during quantity posting for inspection

Dear SAP Guru,
I used a BAPI call : BAPI_INSPLOT_SETUSAGEDECISION in my program to perform UD and post Q-stock to Unrestricted stock. The BAPI executed successfully for my developer user account but not for end user account login.
The BAPI returns an error as below:
Error captured in system: EQV 054Error during quantity posting for inspection lot 340005776022, manual proc. Required
Guess some authorization object for the BAPI_INSPLOT_SETUSAGEDECISION call is missing.
Have tried SE97 for possible Authorization Check for Start of a Transaction but not able to solve the problem.
Can anyone help? Really appreciate that.
Thanks and Regards.

Hi ,
Run the transction SU53 after the error with user login id , to see authorization .
Amol

FM error while saving posting for FB60

Dear all,
i have implemented FM in ecc 6 ver ,while doing FB60 i got the below error.
FM account assignment SPML/DUMMY cannot be posted in posting ledger 9A
Message no. FMBS123
Diagnosis
The budget structure settings do not allow posting to the FM account assignment SPML/DUMMY. The check of the budget structure ended with the return code 4.
The system recognizes the following return codes for the check of posting addresses:
u2022     Return code 1:
The check of posting addresses is switched on. However the FM account assignment SPML/DUMMY is missing in the budget structure. Insert this account assignment in the budget structure for the posting ledger 9A.
u2022     Return code 2:
The check of posting addresses is switched off, but the validation of posting addresses does not allow posting on this address. Check the implementation of the Business Add-In (BAdI) Validate Budget and Posting Addresses in BS.
u2022     Return code 3:
The FM account assignment SPML/DUMMY leads to a conflict when you define a grouping key within the context of the budget structure. Check the implementation of the Business Add-In (BAdI) Define Grouping Key.
u2022     Return code 4:
The derivation strategy used for deriving the budget address from the posting address derives an invalid budget address. You can use the program for displaying of budget structure settings to find out which derivation strategy is used. Check the Derivation Strategy for BudgetAddresses in Customizing. This error may also be caused by inconsistent customizing of active FM account assignment elements in BCS and FM. This can be checked in IMG activity Activate Account Assignment Elements in Budget Control System.
System Response
Processing stops.
Procedure
Check the budget structure settings according to the given return code.

Hi,
Two things:
a) FMDERIVE is relevant for both former and BCS models. It's a strategy which derives FM objects (not address) for postings of the document which have to be assigned to FM (basically, most of FI and LO documents).
b) Strategy for derivation of budget address is something different. Here, you can tell the system where you want your budget to be checked. For example, the posting goes to fund centre X (either by direct entry or via derivation strategy put in FMDERIVE), but the budget to be checked is on fund centre Y. This functionality could be also achieved with AVC controlling objects, but since you work with budget structure, it's more natural to do it there. If your posting and budget entries are on the same level, then you basically don't need the budget address derivation strategy at all.
Regards,
Eli

Stock posting for lot 010000000121 not supported

Hi Experts,
I am unable to reverse the UD and stock by using SAP NOTE 175842.
By using std program RQEVAC50 activated ZQM_RQEVAC50 and given the transaction code.
When I runn this T Code System is giving error massage "Stock posting for lot 010000000121 not supported"
Cross Checked all parameters find below
1) For movement type 322 and 349 assigned T Code QA11 and QA12
2) Posted stock available in same storage location
3) Lot 10 qty posted to unrested qty 10 and lot status is " UD ICCO SPCO STUP "
4) Material Not serial managed
Pls tell me the reason why it is not happening
Thanks
Shiva Patil
Edited by: SHIVA PATIL on Jan 15, 2010 4:10 PM

Resolved

Error in FI posting- J2IUN

Dear All,
In J2IUN simulation is working fine and and when i try to save system showing message ' ERROR IN FI POSTING'.
We tried to utilize for the month of May 2009. Is the error beacuse of FI period closed?
Please suggest how to overcome this error. We have not done utilization in SAP from May onwards. Now we are trying to utilize month wise from May.
Thank you
Regards,
Deepu

hai,
Kindly check all the Gl accounts used for utilization whether the same is maintained in Taxon goods movement , India, account determination.
regards,
Sudhir

Error during J2IUN posting:Error in FI posting

Hello all,
I am getting an error " Error in FI posting 20081203" in the J2IUN tcode. I tried to post monthly utilization for the month of November with posting date 30.11.2008. The periods 8 and 9 ae open.
Please suggest what needs to be done to correct the same.
Sumeet

Dear sumeet,
I think this is not the error of posting period.Please check all the input you are giving is correct one,
Please check the G/L balances against which you are utilizing via FBL3N , it should not minus in any case.whether available amount is sufficient for utilization for all type of taxes?
Also check the total entry by simulating the entry- debit / credit is zero?
Regards,
Parag

J2iun Execution and Error in FI posting (Message no. 8I280)

Hi ,
At our end J2iun were never posted in SAP and all excise return are being handled manually.
Now we are trying to execute J2iun for each month of the last year ( April '08 to march '09) and trying to update our system till march'09 so that from this month onwards , excise returns can be handled thru SAP.
We started with April'08 and in order to get J2iun posted for the month of April'08 , we opened the desired FI periods (2008/1) thru OB52.BUT when we were trying to post J2iun for the month of April'08 , system is prompting an error
"Error in FI posting 20090408 Message no. 8I280"
We couldn't understand why this message is being appeared when required FI periods are already opened. ( In fact we tried with some JV enteries in that period and they are getting posted sucessfully )
Is it because MM april'08 period is already closed ??? (in OMSY , open periods are April'09 and March'08)
If yes , then is there any way to make April'08 MM period open ?
If back MM period opening is not possible then what could be the best method to get GLs and Registers Balances updated with correct value of MARCH'09 closing Balances.
So that j2iun of april'09 can be executed perfectly
Thx in advance for all yr replies
Regards
Shrey

tHX ,
mm PERIOD SHOULD BE oPENed TO PROCESS J2IUN.
cOMMULATIVE RUN IS NOT POSSIBLE, AS J2IUN ALWAYS PICKS THE PAYABLE BALANCE OF THE FIRST PERIOD DATE ENTERED
REGARDS
sHREY

Error occurred during post handling RS_AFTER_IMPORT for UPDR L

Hi friends,
I need your help for 2 issues related to transport
I am getting error while transporting the request from BW DEV to BW QAS..Please help me regarding this issue..
1.)Error occurred during post handling RS_AFTER_IMPORT for UPDR L
       The errors affect the following components:
      BW-WHM (Warehouse Management)
2.)Start of the after-import method RS_UPDR_AFTER_IMPORT for object type(s) UPDR (Activation Mode)
       Error when activating update rule
       IC=0CRM_PROD IS=0PR_IL_PROREF_ATTR error when checking update rules.
Friends these are the two issues im facing while doing the transports._i have checked the update rules in the BW DEV it is working fine._please give some solutions to overcome this issues.
Thanks
Gnana Baskar

Hi Gnana,
Since u r telling tht the update rules are working fine in the Dev system, request u to perform some checks:
1. The Update rule needs to be in active version.
2. The InfoObjects used in the target InfoProvider should be present in the QA system/attached to the request in which u r transporting the changed Update Rule.
3. Manually add objects, if needed all the Before/After objects in the new request and reactivate the Update rule, if it asks for a request give this new request number.
4. Compare the data model in Dev and QA system and try finding the disconnect between them.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Kunal Gandhi

Error occured while posting the job schedule for JDBCAdapter

Hi Experts,
In Application Log in Path: "/usr/sap/<SID>/DVExxxx/j2ee/cluster/server1/log", I see the error:
#/Applications/ExchangeInfrastructure/AdapterFramework/Services/Util
##com.sap.aii.af.service.scheduler.SchedulerManagerImpl.postJobScheduleOthers(String, int)
#J2EE_GUEST#0##n/a##f7956e1f6b4711e0b851001e0b5d3ac8#SAPEngine_Application_Thread[impl:3]_23##0#0
#Error#1#com.sap.aii.af.service.scheduler.SchedulerManagerImpl#Plain
###error occured while posting the job schedule for JDBCAdapter_9f0584b1bcb33b94b67ada456233bcb8 with 2#
Frequently are created Lock's and I need remove them in Visual Admin.
Any idea about this error?
Tks in advance.

Hi,
After applying the SP 23 Patch Level 08, LOCK JDBC problems stopped.
But now when a network error or database error, the JDBC Sender Communication channels that were open to connection, are blocked.
Even following the instructions in [SAP Note 1083488 - XI FTP_JDBC sender channel stop polling indefinitely (04_04S)|https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1wdCZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1083488] the problem continues.
I've already set the parameter "taskTimeout" and selected the option "Disconnect from Database After Each Message Processing" but not resolved.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.

Invoices not posted for accounting(Error:Max. no of items in FI is reached)

Dear Experts,
I have an issue in the billing document.It is not getting posted for Accounting even it is 23(230)and in some cases it is 30 lines line items in it.
It is shoing the error as Max. no of items in FI is reached.
This problem is in Production client only.As we have seen and checked the setting in all the client. It is same every where.
Could any one help.
The SAP help says:The number of accounting line items are restricted to 999 therefore your billing document line items should be significantly less than that to prevent a failure to post an accounting document.
There are two options open to you, one is to split the billing document automatically each time a maximum number of line items are reached, take a look at IMG > Billing >Country Specific Features > Maximum number of Billing Items, then in your copy control line item Data VBRK/VBRP include the following codeu201D

Hi,
Check Note 36353 'AC interface: Summarizing FI documents', it give you ideas as how you can avoid this big number of FI items.
I hope this helps you,
Regards,
Eduardo

Transport Error occurred during post-handling RS_AFTER_IMPORT for ISCS L

Hi,
We are moving cube 0IC_C03 of material stocks/movements
from Dev to Quality and we are facing problem while transporting the Transfer Structure 2lis_03_BF. Other two TS moved successfully.
The transporting is failing with the below error:
Errors occurred during post-handling RS_AFTER_IMPORT for ISCS L"
We tried moving couple of times , still it was failing with the same error and even we tried to activate in Quality with the activate program .It say " there is no Transfer structure to activate.".
BW system is 3.1 c with service pack 18.
Your help greatly appreciated
Thanks,
Sudharani

Hi there,
Have you checked that DataSource is activated and replicated in your R3 Quality system? Check in BW for your source system if 2LIS_03_BF is there.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Carlos

GR Posting Error: Acct. 110000 for trans./event key BSX, postable directly

Hi Gurus,
I am getting an error "Acct. 110000 for trans./event key BSX, postable directly" while posting GR for a PO.
Please help me to resolve this.
Thanks & Regards
Ram

Hi,
Check your material accounting key and for posting key BSK same is not maintained in auto posting for FI.
Ask to FI person for maintaining the GLs for this key in automatic posting config.
Regards
Chetan Mistry

Errors occurred during post-handling PRGN_AFTER_IMP_ACTGROUP_ACGR for ACGR

Hi,
I have to import composite role from development to QAS system.I have generated profile for each role in developemnt & create transport of composite role & moved it in QAS.But in QAS it finished with Return code 8 & I found profiles are not moved in QAS for all single roles.
Error is as follows.
Errors occurred during post-handling PRGN_AFTER_IMP_ACTGROUP_ACGR for ACGR L
The errors affect the following components:
BC-SEC-USR-PFC (Authorization and Role Management)
Please advice if anybody faced such kind of issue.
Regards
Santosh

Rephrased a'la Julius:
> To avoid the problems during the subsequent import into a target client, the AGR_NUM_2 table can be maintained as customizing for the clients (plural) in the source development system where the roles are maintained. If more than one client is used for role development, a number range gap of 50000 between the clients should be sufficient to prevent profile name collisions (otherwise you have much bigger problems anyway...).
>
> This is because the system ID (sy-sysid) is used as an attribute in the generated profile's name, but not the client (sy-mandt). > The value set in the AGR_NUM_2 tables determines the current number per client of the next sequential number to be used for profile generation. The customer can initialize this number to insert an additional attribute per client to achieve unique generated names within client specified ranges.
Something like that
Cheers,
Julius

Error in FI Posting for J2IUN - Utilization

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for