Error in File to IDOC Scenario

Hi,
I have File to IDOC scenario.
I am getting error in sender file channel.
"Conversion initialization failed: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: Error(s) in XML conversion parameters found: Mandatory parameter 'xml.keyfieldName': no value found "
Although I have used this parameter in content conversion 'xml.keyfieldName' (for each sub structure and defined a key field).
Despite of this error in sender channel I am receiving the message in XI.
But in XI also it throws error :
"Unable to convert the sender service PG_TOM_CEEMEA_RU_SFA to an ALE logical system"
Any help on this ?
Thanks,
Vikas

Hello Vikas,
I am getting error in sender file channel.
"Conversion initialization failed: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: java.lang.Exception: Error(s) in XML conversion parameters found: Mandatory parameter 'xml.keyfieldName': no value found "
Although I have used this parameter in content conversion 'xml.keyfieldName' (for each sub structure and defined a key field).
Check your flat file structure whether the key field you have chosen is appropriate and also recheck the FCC details whether you have assigned the value for the key field i.e.  keyFieldValue.
"Unable to convert the sender service PG_TOM_CEEMEA_RU_SFA to an ALE logical system"
regarding the above error refer this
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/Unable%20to%20convert%20Sender%20system%20to%20ALE%20logical%20system
Regards,
Prasanna

Similar Messages

  • Error in File-PI-Idoc scenario

    Dear All,
    While working on File-PI-Idoc scenario, I am getting the error as
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Call Adapter
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
      <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">UNAUTHORIZED</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>401</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2>Unauthorized</SAP:P2>
      <SAP:P3>(See attachment HTMLError for details)</SAP:P3>
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:Stack />
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    I have checked various other posts on the same error but still I am not able to resolve this.
    Please help me in resolving this error.
    reg,
    nj

    Nishu,
    Please check whether you have assigned the following roles to the particular user you are using for data communication.
    Roles:
    SAP_XI_IS_SERV_USER,
    SAP_XI_APPL_SERV_USER
    Regards,
    Sugata

  • IDOC is posting with Errors in File to IDOC scenario

    Hi,
       I did the File  to IDOC scenario for CREMAS  . IDOC is posting with Errors .. i.e. in the status record it was showing  56- EDI: Partner profile inbound not available  ..
    If I manually process that IDOC in WE19 , then it was processing successfully..    and in the  we19 it was showing Inbound Processing : Port Not Maintained    but even though manually it was posting fine...
    any ideas regarding this will be appriciated..... 
    Regards
    Babu

    Please check whether you had done the following assuming your doing File to Idoc
    Settings in your Business service for the receiving system
    Please specify the RFC detination, SAP System and Client of the Receiving System in the adapter specific detials.
    Settings in R/3
    WE20 - Add the partner profile for the particular message type cremas and process code.
    Your statement
    " and that same logical system name  had given as Message Specific Attributes in the Sender Business Sevice parameters in I.D "
    Please do mention R/3 Details in the receiver business service or system.
    Thnz

  • How to catch Posting error in File to IDoc Scenario?

    I have successfully completed File to IDoc Scenario. Now I am interested in catching posting error. i.e., if mapping goes well and when IDoc is being sent to Recipient system then if any posting error is encountered, then a mail should go to a recipient.
    Can anybody suggest the solution.
    Regards,
    Suraj Kumar

    Hi Suraj,
    this can be done by triggerring an alert to the recipient.chk out these links to trigger a alert
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2005/01/14/alert-management--improving-monitoring-of-your-landscape
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2005/01/14/alert-management--improving-monitoring-of-your-landscape
    regards
    jithesh

  • Error in file-ro-idoc scenario

    Hi! I'm trying this scenario https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/05/11/fileToIDOC&
    And and have an error "Unable to convert the sender service MDM_to_CRM_BC to an ALE logical system". What maybe wrong in my scenario ?

    Vishnu, I'm very sorry, but:
    I've opened we02 ---> Inbound idocs ---> CRMXIF_PARTNER_SAVE_M  ---> Status 56
    Then I've opened my idoc and see:
    Control Rec
    Data records - idoc fields
    Status records --> 56 --> EDI: Partner profile not available
    Message no. E0332
    Diagnosis
    A partner profile could not be found with the following key:
    /ls_p1d    /LS/
    This involves the key fields of the table EDPP1:
    -PARNUM  partner number
    -PARTYP  partner type
    Procedure
    Please check the EDI partner profiles.
    What should I do now?

  • Catch Mapping Error in File to IDoc scenario

    Configured BPM and now learning Error Handling. I know that through BPM we can handle system Errors, but I doubt whether Mapping error is a system error.
    I am interested to know the classification of errors with examples, preferably listing out all types of errors.
    Please provide some weblogs or explain briefly how to handle system and application errors through BPM.
    Thanks,
    Raja

    Hi Raja,
    You will need CCMS if you want to send the Alerts to external system or you want to access the ALerts from the transaction. You can capture your alerts without this also.
    When you go to Alert Configuration in the Runtime Workbench you can see Create Alert Rules. These rules are pertaining to the error generated in your AF,AE or IE.
    Once you have completed the whole config. The error happening in the AE, IE or AF would trigger the alert. you can see this in your Alert Inbox.
    The best would be if you go through the URL I have mentioned below.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/80/942f3ffed33d67e10000000a114084/content.htm
    You have to use BPM only if you want to do an activity after the alerts are raised. 
    Regards
    Vijaya
    Message was edited by: vijaya kumari

  • Message has error status at outbound side File To Idoc Scenario

    hi ,
    In my File to Idoc scenario , when i go to sxmb_moni , i found that its showing red flag at Outbound Status Tab and showing message "Message has error status at outbound side".
    When i go to IDX5 and and select my idoc and click on Transaction Id it shows "Password logon no longer possible - too many faile" .
    Please suggest what may be the problem ?
    Regards,
    Rohit

    1. First check the RFC destination name used in receiver Idoc adapter communication channel.
    2. As i said earlier, in sm59 transaction in XI gui, u can check same rfc destination under type 3. There check the logon credentials and the username.
    3. Now goto the R3 system GUI and check in su01 that same user is locked or not. If locked unlock it.
    4. And if u change the password of that user, then do the similar change in XI -> sm59 -> rfc destination logon credential
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • Regarding error in XI File to IDoc scenario

    Hi,
    when i was  doing file 2 idoc scenario i got this error "Unable to convert sender service to an ALE logical system". please resolve my issue as early as possible.

    Uday,
    Please go through these threads:
    Unable to convert the sender service to an ALE logical system
    How to convert Sender Party/Service  to a Logical System?
    Unable to convert the sender service to an ALE logical system
    BR,
    Alok
    Edited by: Alok Sharma on Jan 31, 2008 12:39 PM

  • Idocs with errors added status-56 in file to idoc scenario- how to rectify

    hi ,
    in file to idoc scenario when i m sending the file from ftp server to IS Retail,  file is successfully getting processed but the idoc is showing error ,when we see using WE05 tcode or BD87 , pl sugggest how to rectify it to make the status 53

    Hi,
    Have you configured the partner profile details? check these steps..
    1. In the receiver system you must configure the partner profile for your sender system in WE20.
    2. Add the IDoc message type to inbound parameters of the partner profile and configure the appropriate process code.
    2. Fill the Logical system name for your senderservice-->Adapter Specific identifiers in ID.
    <a href="/people/venugopalarao.immadisetty/blog/2007/01/24/troubleshooting-file-to-idoc-scenario-in-xi File-to-IDOC Scenario</a> By Venugopalarao
    <a href="/people/ravikumar.allampallam/blog/2005/02/23/configuration-steps-required-for-posting-idocsxi Steps for Posting IDOC's</a> By Ravikumar Allampalam
    Regards
    San

  • File to IDOC scenario error...

    Hi all,
    we hhave created an File to Idoc scenario .
    we are getting the following error in SXMB_MONI t-code.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_INV_SND_SERV</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>BUS_SENDER</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Unable to convert sender service BUS_SENDER to an ALE logical system</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    can any one plz say wat this error might be..
    TIA
    Regards,
    Raj

    Hi,
    The problem occurs when sender and receiver business system or business service does not have a logical system name.
    ID - Integration Directory
    Posting the IDOC'S into SAP R/3 System, sender and receiver business system or business service requires the logical system name. If the business system (Web As ABAP) does not have the logical system name, then add the logical system for business system.
    If business system type = Web AS ABAP, then add the Logical system in Technical System level and Save.
    If business system type = Third-Party, then add the logical system in business system level and Save.
    If the business service does not have the logical system name in ID, it needs to be configured as follows.
    Go to ID and click the Business service -> Services -> Adapter Specific Identifiers. Enter the logical system name and Save.
    Apply and activate.
    hope this will help you.
    regards
    Aashish Sinha
    PS : reward points if helpful

  • Error:IDOC_ADAPTER" ATTRIBUTE_INV_SND_PARTY : File to IDOC scenario .

    Dear XI experts ,
    Issue : Error to a new implementated SAP ERP SYSTEM . File to IDOC Scenario
    Business Scenario :  Exchange Rates from Thomas REuters (XML) - > XI-> SAP 1 , SAP 2  ERP Systems ( 2 diff SAP ERP systems)
    SAP 2 is a new  system set up for a new plant  of our Organization.
    The Excahnge rate is gettiong updated  by IDOC: EXCHANGERATE.EXCHANGE_RATE01 in  two SAP Systems
    Each one is configured with  diffrent IDOC receiver .
    The Error is :       for the SAP 2 system  . The MEssage gets branched and one  message is successfully sent to SAP1 , and turns an error :    in SXMB_MONI for SAP2  system
    I had been thropugh few blogs have performed the below steps:
    -IDOC metadata : IDX2  have configured in XI
    -checked the port of EGP , Partner Profile in SAP 2 ERP system
    -Checked IDX1 , IDX2 of SAPEGP in XI .
    -Refreshed business system .
    -Tried to send the xml data from the start point through File Zilla(FTP)
    Could somehow help as this is Production issue  ans this is affecting the business.
    Error from SXMB_MONI:
    <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_INV_SND_PARTY</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>http://sap.com/xi/XI</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2>XIParty</SAP:P2>
      <SAP:P3>Reuters</SAP:P3>
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Unable to convert sender XI party http://sap.com/xi/XI / XIParty / Reuters to an IDoc partner</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
    Reuters : is the Sender Party of Exchange Rates. I have seen in blogs to craete agency / schema , but since thsi scenario is 2 seperate SAP ERP systems , my question is do i need to create agency , schema for sender party .
    Appreciate your Input
    Thank you,
    Vara
    Edited by: Varalakshmi SB on Oct 26, 2011 12:14 PM
    Edited by: Varalakshmi SB on Oct 26, 2011 12:16 PM

    agency and scheme are used when your doing B2B scenarios.

  • File to IDoc scenario( Bypass)-- Error ( Segment is missing) -- urgent pls.

    Hi All,
    I am doing File to IDoc scenario( Bypass) for Orders05.
    File is picking succesfully and not posting the idoc in the SAP..
    My source file(idoc-xml) consists of all the required data to post the idoc including the segment 'E1EDK01'.
    but the error it is showing is <b>" Obligatory node 'E1EDK01' missing in the structure ORDERS05 "</b>
    Please suggest me ASAP what is going wrong .
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards
    Seema.

    The source File is not the idoc XML. It is invalid. You might need to ask the source to change the XML or use a Mapping to do this.
    This is how it should look, ( check the parts in bold),
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <ORDERS05>
    <IDOC <b>BEGIN ="1"</b>>
    <EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="EDI_DC40">
    <DOCNUM>1</DOCNUM>
    <DIRECT>2</DIRECT>
    <IDOCTYP>ORDERS05</IDOCTYP>
    <CIMTYP></CIMTYP>
    <MESTYP>ORDERS</MESTYP>
    <SNDPOR>XXXXXXXXX</SNDPOR>
    <SNDPRT>LS</SNDPRT>
    <SNDPFC></SNDPFC>
    <SNDPRN>XXXXXXXX</SNDPRN>
    <RCVPOR>XXXXXX</RCVPOR>
    <RCVPRT>LS</RCVPRT>
    <RCVPFC></RCVPFC>
    <RCVPRN>XXXXXXXX</RCVPRN>
    <CREDAT>20070511</CREDAT>
    <CRETIM>152803</CRETIM>
    </EDI_DC40>
    <E1EDK01 <b>SEGMENT = "1"</b>><BELNR>AAAAAAAAA123</BELNR>
    </E1EDK01<b>SEGMENT = "1"</b>>
    <E1EDKA1 ><PARVW>EK</PARVW> <ILNNR>231654845121</ILNNR>
    </E1EDKA1>
    <E1EDKA1 <b>SEGMENT = "1"</b>><PARVW>LF</PARVW>
    <NAME1>international</NAME1>
    <NAME2>Delhi</NAME2>
    <ILNNR>2121211545</ILNNR>
    </E1EDKA1><E1EDK02 <b>SEGMENT = "1"</b>><QUALF>001</QUALF>
    <BELNR>AAAAAAAAA123</BELNR>
    </E1EDK02><E1EDK02 <b>SEGMENT = "1"</b>><QUALF>002</QUALF>
    <BELNR>AAAAAAAAA123</BELNR>
    </E1EDK02><E1EDP01><POSEX>45</POSEX>
    <E1EDP19 <b>SEGMENT = "1"</b>><QUALF>001</QUALF>
    <IDTNR>00000000002150059</IDTNR>
    <KTEXT>Reddy</KTEXT>
    </E1EDP19><E1EDP19>
    <QUALF>003</QUALF>
    <IDTNR>5484218521214</IDTNR>
    </E1EDP19></E1EDP01>
    </IDOC></ORDERS05>
    Regards
    Bhavesh
    PS : You need to add SEGMENT = "1" for every segment. Please do add it if I have missed in the XML above.

  • Error while doing a File to IDOC scenario

    Hi Experts,
    I have created a File to IDOC scenario where in i have sent a file which has to pass data to ABSEN1 IDOC.I could see the IDOC reaching R/3 ,but with the status 56: "EDI: Partner profile inbound not available"
    I have checked with all the configurations and couldnt find where it went wrong.
    Kindly help me in this regard.
    Thanks.

    Hi
    Check the inbound parameter and the process code.
    To find Process code for IDoc use Tcode WE42.
    ALE idoc trouble shooting use
    Troubleshooting of ALE Process
    look also this configuration
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/6bd6f69a-0701-0010-a88b-adbb6ee89b34

  • Error values in Idoc Control Records in File to Idoc Scenarios

    Hi All,
       I am posting 2 different types of Idocs in 2 different File-to-Idoc Scenarios. In many cases both these files may get picked at the same time. One is an Orders Idoc and the other one is Shipment Idoc. The Orders Idoc has a control record value in the Sender Partner Fn as 'ZC' while as for Shipment Idoc that value is not passed. The other Sender parameters are passed and are different for both these idocs. But when the files are processed, the value 'ZC' get populated for the Shipment Idoc also. When 100 files are sent with 90 orders and 10 shipments, the shipments get created with 'ZC' partner fn. This is visible in the Call Adapter Pipeline Step under the node IDocOutbound. . I have 2 different Idoc receiver adapters.Can anybody help me out here?
    Thanks,
    Geetha

    Hey,
    >'ZC' while as for Shipment Idoc that value is not passed
    Check whether the Source/ Mapping  populates the 'ZC' , Did you checked Apply Control record in Receiver Adapter for Shipment, What is the name  you have mentioned for the in the SLD -Logical system  for Sender system
    Cheers
    Agasthuri

  • File to IDOC scenario : Error with mapping due to Context handling

    Hi Experts.
    I have a file to IDOC scenario which need your advice.
    Source File structure as follows:
    Control_Header     <1:1>
    Invoice_Header     <1:unbounded)
    Invoice_Line          <1:unbounded)
    Trailer                    <1:1>
    Payload as follows capture from SXMB_MONI
    - <Control_Header>
            <Key>999</Key>
            <TransactionID>RCTV</TransactionID>
      </Control_Header>
    - <Invoice_Header>
        <Key>000</Key>
        <BusinessUnit>HDB05</BusinessUnit>
        <InvoiceNo>64471</InvoiceNo>  
    </Invoice_Header>
    - <Invoice_Line>
          <Key>001</Key>
          <UnitPrice>7.00000</UnitPrice>
          <Quantity>1.0000</Quantity>
          <GSTAmount>0.49</GSTAmount>
          <GSTRate>0.07</GSTRate>
      </Invoice_Line>
    - <Invoice_Line>
          <Key>001</Key>
          <UnitPrice>8.00000</UnitPrice>
          <Quantity>1.0000</Quantity>
          <GSTAmount>0.56</GSTAmount>
          <GSTRate>0.07</GSTRate>  
    </Invoice_Line>
    - <Invoice_Header>
          <Key>000</Key>
         <BusinessUnit>HDB21</BusinessUnit>
         <InvoiceNo>6Y0575</InvoiceNo>
    </Invoice_Header>
    - <Invoice_Line>
        <Key>001</Key>
        <UnitPrice>49.50000</UnitPrice>
        <Quantity>1.0000</Quantity>
        <GSTAmount>3.47</GSTAmount>
        <GSTRate>0.07</GSTRate>
    </Invoice_Line>
    - <Trailer>
         <Key>TRL</Key>
         <TransactionID>RCTV</TransactionID>
         <TotalFeedLine>96</TotalFeedLine>
         <HashTotalValue>212.00</HashTotalValue>
    </Trailer>
      </ns:MT_EINVOICE>
    Mapping as follow:
                                                   IDOC
    <Control_Header>   ->    <Control_Header>
    <Invoice_Header>   -->  <Header_Invoice>
    <Invoice_Line>      --->        removeContext  -->  <Line_Invoice>       this is the child node of <Header_Invoice>
    <Trailer>               -
    >    <Trailer>
    The result of the using the above Payload get the following result which not wht I seek
    <Control_Header>
    <Header_Invoice>
          <Line_Invoice>
          <Line_Invoice>
         <Line_Invoice>   *** This belong to the Invoice_Line of the second <Header_Invoice> at the payload
    <Header_Invoice>
         <Line_Invoice>   *** THis segment is empty
    <Trailer>
    I required the Line_Invoice to belong to the child of the second <Header_Invoice>, I have tried using
    removecontext with splitVaue and collaspeContext but to no avail.
    May I know what is my mistake on the mapping of the Invoice_Line to Line_Invoice>
    Rgds
    FNG

    Hello,
    There should be something that could correlate the Invoice_Header/Key and Invoice_Line/Key. In your example, both are the same for the first and data set. If the sample looks like the one below, it is possible to sort things by correlating the Invoice_Header key and Invoice_Line key
    <Invoice_Header>
      <Key>000<Key>
    </Invoice_Header>
    <Invoice_Line>
      <Key>000<Key>
    </Invoice_Line>
    <Invoice_Line>
      <Key>000<Key>
    </Invoice_Line>
    <Invoice_Header>
      <Key>001<Key>
    </Invoice_Header>
    <Invoice_Line>
      <Key>001<Key>
    </Invoice_Line>
    An example mapping could look like this
    For Header
    Invoice_Header --> Header_Invoice
    For Line
    /InvoiceLine/Key --> removeContext --> splitByValue:valueChanged --> Invoice_Line
    The subfields of the invoice line would also follow a similar logic, you just need to use formatByExample --> splitByValue:eachValue so that the context levels are the same.
    Hope this helps,
    Mark

Maybe you are looking for

  • Drop down text options

    I'm looking for feedback on other options for displaying drop down text. I'm getting feedback from my users that they don't understand that green italic text (or what ever format is used) assumes drop down text. Most people are now used to seeing col

  • Grouping Free Characteristics in Query Designer?

    Hello, I have a couple reports that per busniess have many free characteristics. So many that that they do not fit on one page and you must continue scrolling the page down to view all. This makes the report look sloppy but the business owner wants a

  • Port 8888 for MAMP-Apache vs. port 80 for OSX-Apache

    I'm trying to set up MAMP and don't know whether to choose port 8888 for MAMP-Apache or port 80 for the OSX-Apache. I had read that you can't use port 80 if file sharing is turned on because you can't have two versions of Apache running at the same t

  • Script to remove first characters of a PDF filename?

    I know this should be easy, but I'm not a coder and don't have many occasions to write scripts.  I hope this is like a two second request for someone out there.  All I'd like to do is point a script at a PDF that will look at the filename, chop off t

  • Problems in GP Transport - Deployment of SDA

    Hi, I am facing problems when I am deploying the SDA file which I have created for GP.   The first time I deployed the SDA file, it was showing me the objects inside a folder and I was able to release them. But on subsequent deployment, I was just ge