Error in Multi-mapping without BPM

Hi frnds,
I am doing a scenario File-XI-File. I am using the multi-splitting thing in the Message mapping. I have taken care of all the occurance's and "enhanced" thing in the IR and ID resp. I m using SP16. I want to avoid BPM.
But therez sme error cming up. When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping" and when I test my interface using the Test Configuration in the ID, its shwing error in the Receiver Determination -- "HTTP connection to ABAP Runtime failed. Error: 403 Forbidden"
I have checked most of the blogs and forum suggestions. I have checked the ICF activations as well ...
So, do come back to me with your valuable suggestions, and I will award them points, if they really help me out.
Thanks and regards.
Neetesh

Hi Neetesh,
<i>
When I check the MONI, its shwing "No messages created from split mapping"</i>
For this, Can you check the source XML. Does it contain Tags like <messages> .. If yes, you need to remove them from your source XML.
If i am right, you have copied the XML from the TEST tab of the message mapping and pasted it in a notepad and saved it without making any changes at all..... Just do as i have mentioned above and i am sure you will no more get that error message in your MONI....
Also go through this weblog which talks about multi-mapping without BPM,
/people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
Regards,
Abhy

Similar Messages

  • Duplicate Message ID issue in case of Multi mapping (without BPM)

    Hi Experts,
    I am doing one sample Example for my requirement of converting the single source message data into the multiple Target messages.
    for example, when sender system is sending the 5 sale order details into a single message in PI then my Inbound proxy class of ECC R/3 receiver system must get this sale orders separately, that means inbound proxy class method must be triggered separately for 5 sale orders from sender system. for achieving this, I have used the Multi mapping concept in ESR (without BPM).
    This scenario is in Asynchronous mode.
    The below screen shots give the details on what I have configures so far.
    IN ESR
    IN ID
    IN SXMB_MONI of PI
    IN SXMB_MONI of ECC R/3 Receiver system (Error in Processing)
    due to this error, inbound Proxy class method is not being triggered for the single Sale order details as well,
    please let me know how to tackle this duplicate message ID issue when we have multiple payloads to process in a single message.
    please also let me know if is there any other workaround to fulfil this requirement.
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Jagesh

    Hi Nunu,
    Check the below blog for restrictions.
    Multi-Mapping without BPM - Yes, it’s possible!
    Restrictions
    Messages that result from the split in a mapping-based message split are sent using one AE. So only adapters running on the AE are supported. In particular, this means that target IDOC message splits are not supported since the IDOC adapter is not part of the AE.
    Regards,
    Praveen.

  • Multi-Mapping without BPM

    Hi ,
    I am following this weblog
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
    but stuck up with what are the fields contained by ID in target message2 ...
    Please check this for your clarification
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/11212307@N08/1135395357/
    Thanks
    dushanth

    ID will have only ID under it. instead of creating flat structure like the one above Jin has changed the strucutre below . you will have only ID field in it or you want u can add other fields in it .
    Regards
    Sreeram.G.Reddy

  • Multi Mapping without BPM (JMS 2 IDoc)

    Hi,
    i have a JMS-Query where it is necessary to map the given data to two different IDoc Types.
    Therefore i have to mappings in two different namespaces. Is it possible to use these insde of the interface Mapping?! Or does the target types have to be in one mapping and one namespace?!
    Can i use context objects?!
    Please guide me! br, Jens

    HI,
    Ingeneral multi mapping in IM , we can use , to do it it should satisfies accordingly .. i mean see the below link
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/11/01/xi-xml-node-into-a-string-with-graphical-mapping
    Multiple message mappings in one integration scenario
    With context object , we can route based on condition , this will be used in interface determination with condition , to this condition , we can use Context object, but it should be configured in MI.
    Regards
    Chilla

  • Multi-Mapping without BPM (Multiples IDoc To one EDI output?)

    Hi all,
    We are currently working for a client that want us to create, based on a multiple IDoc (an idoc that contains data of more than one idoc) only one output
    Meaning that we have to do a mapping that based in this multiple input generates only one output that cointains all that data in only one flat file
    example:
    Idoc: PERX2002.PAYTEXT generates an EDI 820 with this structure:
    LIST
    /S_ISA (first input)
    /S_ISA (second input)
    At this moment we tried to use "Collect IDoc" option in SAP, and as seen in other blogs we changed the ocurrency of the message mapping to "0.unbounded", but when we release several idocs (WE14) we only get multiples output files (3 idoc collected and released give us 3 different edi files) instead only one edi file with all the data gathered together as ISA segments
    In this required process possible???
    Thanks in advance

    As you can see in the following pics..
    http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/8352/process1xz1.jpg
    http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/4954/processvc9.jpg
    i already made those changes, the multi-mapping is set, and also the option for collecting the IDocs and the "enhanced" option in the Integration Directory, but when i release all the idocs i still get multiple outputs (2 files), instead one file with all the gathered data
    Could someone tell me if  i'm missing some step?
    Thanks for your time
    Edited by: Alexis Alanis on Jan 7, 2008 7:24 PM

  • 1:N mapping without BPM ( Idoc Receiver)

    Hi,
    I have a scenario like 1:N, source would be JMS and the receiver side have two Idocs with the same business system. based on one Item segment value, I need to route the input JMS message to corresponding receiver IDoc.
    INput Structure:
    Record
    Header 1..1
    H1
    H2
    H3
    Item 1..Unbounded
    I1
    I2
    I3
    NOte: Based on value I2, I need to route the message to corresponding receiver Idoc. like If I2=A then Idoc1 and I2=B then Idoc2. Can we achieve the same without using BPM?
    -Esha

    Hi,
    This can be achieved with Interface Determination conditions. Go for 2 mapping. And in Interface Determination put condition to check which mapping to use. No need of ccBPM.
    If you still want to go for 1:N multimapping please refer link:
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
    without BPM.
    Regards,
    Vineetha.
    Edited by: Vineetha on Apr 27, 2010 11:44 AM

  • 1:n mapping without BPM

    Hello Friends,
    I need some help about this mapping issue.
    input file :
    <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
         <SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
         <SOAP:Body>
              <Object_1>
                   <ID>12222333444</ID>
                   <points>50</points>
              </Object_1>
              <Object_1>
                   <ID>12222333555</ID>
                   <points>20</points>
              </Object_1>
              <Object_1>
                   <ID>1222233777</ID>
                   <points>10</points>
              </Object_1>
         </SOAP:Body>
    </SOAP:Envelope>
    output file1 :
    <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
         <SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
         <SOAP:Body>
              <Object_1>
                  <ID>12222333444</ID>
                   <points>50</points>
              </Object_1>
         </SOAP:Body>
    </SOAP:Envelope>
    output file 2 :
    <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
         <SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
         <SOAP:Body>
              <Object_1>
                  <ID>12222333555</ID>
                   <points>20</points>
              </Object_1>
         </SOAP:Body>
    </SOAP:Envelope>
    output file 3 :
    <SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
         <SOAP:Header></SOAP:Header>
         <SOAP:Body>
              <Object_1>
                  <ID>1222233777</ID>
                   <points>10</points>
              </Object_1>
         </SOAP:Body>
    </SOAP:Envelope>
    Best regards,
    FK

    I think you have not followed the blog properly for your requirement.
    for example: Source File is like this.
    <Records>
      <FirstName>Sarvesh</FirstName>
      <LastName>Singh</LastName>
      <Dept>SAP</Dept>
      <EmpID>12345</EmpID>
      <Domain>technical conslultant</Domain>
      <Experience>5 years</Experience>
    </Records>
    'N' Target Structure are
    <Records>
      <EmpName>
               <FirstName>Sarvesh</FirstName>
               <LastName>Singh</LastName>
      </EmpName>
    </Records>
    <Records>
      <EmpDetail>
             <Dept>SAP</Dept>
             <EmpID>12345</EmpID>
             <Domain>technical conslultant</Domain>
             <Experience>5 years</Experience>
      <EmpDetail>
    </Records>
    So if you think your requirement is as per the above examples then follow /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible blog.
    Regards,
    Sarvesh

  • Error: 1:n multi-mapping using BPM for file to file scenario

    Hi. Iu2019m trying to do 1:n multi-mapping using bpm scenario. I use file to file. Input file consists of many records and then I want many record to be transformed into many file at target system. I follow step in http://www.riyaz.net/blog/xipi-1n-multi-mapping-using-bpm/. However, I have a problem when file is retrieved in to XI. It doesnu2019t create any output file.
    When I look at SXMB_MONI, it shows u201CNo object type found for the message Check that the corresponding process is activated.u201D Besides, it shows error message "Unable to perform action for selected message" when i clikc at PE in SXMB_MONI.
    I have check at many previous posts with the same error message but still couldnu2019t solve it. I already activate my BPM and check that status in SXI_CACHE = 0. There is noting left in change list of my IR and ID.
    Here is my design and configuration.
    IR
    Data Type: DT_file_split -> for both input and output file
    Message Type: MT_file_split_sender, MT_file_split_receiver
    Message Interface: SI_file_split_in, SI_file_split_out, SI_file_abs_source, SI_file_abs_target
    Message mapping: MM_file_split for mapping MT_file_split_sender with MT_file_split_receiver
    Interface mapping: OM_file_split
    u2022     Source = SI_file_split_out
    u2022     Target = SI_file_split_in
    u2022     Mapping Program = MM_file_split
    BPM following this link http://www.riyaz.net/blog/xipi-1n-multi-mapping-using-bpm/.
    ID
    Import my Integration process
    2 Communication Channel for getting input file (CC_File_split_sender) and creating output file (CC_File_split)
    2 Receiver determination:
    u2022     Source system to BPM using interface SI_File_Abs_source
    u2022     BPM to target system using interface SI_File_Abs_target
    1 Interface determination:
    u2022     from source system to BPM
    u2022     Sender interface: SI_File_Split_Out
    u2022     Receiver interface: SI_file_abs_source
    1 Sender Agreement
    u2022     Commu. Component: Source System
    u2022     Using interface: SI_File_Abs_source
    u2022     Sender Communication Channel: CC_File_Split_Sender
    1 Receiver Agreement
    u2022     Sender Communication Component: BPM
    u2022     Receiver Communication Component: Target System
    u2022     Receiver Interface: SI_File_Split_In
    u2022     Receiver Communication Channel: CC_File_Split
    Anyone know how to fix this?
    Thanks,
    Pavin

    Hi,
    Yes, thats the problem.
    You are creating file from test tab of  1..N mapping .
    In case of 1..N mappping in mapping Extra tags of messages are addded to the data.As shown here:-
    Messages
          Message1
               MessageType
    When you use this mapping to generate xml message then it will add additional tags for <Messages> and <Message1>, which is not correct. it should only have structure of you MT.
    So remove start and end tag of <Messages> and <Message1> from your data file. Mentioned below in bold.
    <xml......>
    <Messages>
    <Message1>
    <MT_...>
    </MT_...>
    </Message1>
    </Messages>
    This should solve your problem.
    Regards,
    Sami.

  • Multi-Mapping with BPM?

    Hi Experts,
                    Can anyone send me a scenario which contains multi-mapping using BPM (collect pattern)........I searched on SDN but cudn't find any scenario which contains Multi-Mapping BPM scenarios. All the scenarios which r available based on without BPM.............points will given to the approriate replies.
    Thanks in Advance
    Faisal

    Hey
    strange you didn't find it,it was the second link when i searched SDN with the string "multimapping BPM"
    /people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
    Thanx
    Aamir

  • 1:N Mapping without BPM - Inbound Structure

    Hello,
    I know that a 1:N Mapping without BPM should be possible with newer releases. I tried to do so and set the occurences in the signature tab of message mapping to 1:N.
    However the problem I am facing right now is that a new <Messages> element is wrapped around the source structure. So the incoming message is not valid anymore and therefore the target structure is empty. How should this be handled? Does the source system need to add a new <messages> root element or is ccBPM not avoidable in my case?
    Thank you!

    Hi Guppenberger,
    I understand your doing 1:N mapping without BPM.
    There is no need to added the message wrapper when you are testing your scenario end to end. But if you are testing your message mapping alone, wrapper is required in test tab of Message Mapping. Please refer this blow [Link|/people/ranga.rajan2/blog/2010/03/17/multi-mapping-with-a-simple-scenario--fledgling-kit ], have a look at payload screenshot. I suggest you to check you payload (for end to end testing) and mapping logic again.
    Regards,
    Raghu_Vamsee

  • N:1 mapping without BPM

    Hi All,
    Is it possible to do N:1 mapping without BPM in PI 7.1 ?
    Thanks and regards
    Uma

    Hi,
    >Yeah, It is possible.
    how can it be possible based on ANY requirement ?
    you just cannot receive many messages into PI and bundle them into
    one without BPM - and this is final
    can you tell the way if you know how to do it without a BPM
    in any (even very specific) scenario ?
    thanks,
    Regards,
    Michal Krawczyk

  • Error in multi mapping bpm

    Hi all,
    In bpm, i have used a multi mapping transformation. And I get a error message that ' Cannot produce target element, check  whether the source instance is valid' . And my two source messages are valid.
    But in message mapping, i have given src1 and src2 as source messages in the same order.
    But in the Messages_IN tab of bpm, the order of messages is reversed and it is src2 and src1. Can this be the reason  for my mapping error? If so, how to rectify this.
    If this is not the case, any more suggestions?

    Hi Aarthi,
         Check your occurence of Target strucuture migth be 1 to 1 or 1 to Unbounded.U r message mapping doesn't populates the data for u r target strucutre.Test u r mapping by giving the valid data( Which data is pass of mapping validations).
    In your mapping go to messages tab and check the sequence of your message types are correct or not.If not choose Message types once in correct sequence.
    Cheers
    Veera
    >>> Reward Points,If it is needful.

  • 1:2 Message Mapping WithOut BPM - Split mapping created no messages Error

    Hi,
    I am a new-bie to SAP PI and am trying out the following scenario without BPM.
    Make multiple files based on Age received from input file.Input File contains Name,DOB and Output File contains Name, Age.
    I want to create 2 files, one containing details of people with Age <21 and the other output file containing details of people with Age >= 21.
    To acheive this,
    In IR, I created 2 DT and 3 MT,1 MM with 2 Target MT,both having occurences 0..unbounded, 1 IM with 2 Target MI,both having occurences 0..unbounded
    And in ID, 1 Sender Agreement, 2 Receiver Agreement, 1 Receiver Determination, 1 Interface Determination using Enhanced Interface Determination.
    When i run this scenario, I am getting the following error "Split mapping created no messages"
    Please let me know how can I resolve it.

    Oops, I did not know that.
    Thanks for that information. uhuuuuuuuuuuu, atlast the message is processed and I am seeing output files created.
    But, there is still one problem. My output files are created with just the following content
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
      <ns1:MT_2OP_File_Out xmlns:ns1="http://POC_Sec1_1IP2OP2" />
    In MM, I see the output message as follows:
    Message
         Message1
             MT_2OP_File_Out
                  Employee
                      Name
                      Age
         Message2
             MT_2OP_File_Out1
                  Employee1
                      Name
                      Age
    The mapping done:
    MT_2OP_File_Out and MT_2OP_File_Out with the Message Type element on source end.
    Employee and Employee1 are mapped as
         Age -> removeContext -> SplitByValue[Each Value] < 21, Map Employee
         Age -> removeContext -> SplitByValue[Each Value] >= 21, Map Employee1 resp
    The fields are straight maps.
    Is there any basic mapping error that I am making. Please help.

  • Multi Message Mapping without BPM: Limitaions

    Hi Crew,
    I have done this one(without BPM)
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/3115. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
    I understood that there cannot be multiple receiver services.
    This message splitting can be done only with one sender and one receiver business services (with many communication channels) without BPM.
    Am I right?
    Are there anymore limitations than this?
    Regards,
    Karthik kaveriselvan.

    <i>select multiple receivers using the + button.</i>
    one sender service.
    two receiver service referring to one target interface each with one communicaiton channel each.
    Two interface determination for two business services and they both are refering to the same enhanced interface mapping.
    Created receiver determination and added the two receiver service to it, but when looking at the configuration overview for receiver determinaiton, for each service, both the target interfaces used in interface mapping are listed and the reciever determination shows "Does not exist".
    When I run the scenario, I get "No receiver agreement found" error.
    Please calrify how many receiver agreements have to be configured and how?
    Thanks
    karthik

  • Exception Handling for Multi Mapping in bpm

    Hello,
    does anybody know a way of catching an error occured in a multi-mapping used in an integration process.
    It seems to me, that when i am using a multi-mapping in an integration process and an error occurs, the message cannot get back to the integration process. In smq2 I can see, that there is the following error:
    CX_MERGE_SPLIT
    Regards
    Günther

    The transformation-step is in an block with an exception branch and it is well configured.
    When I use a 1 to 1 mapping and an error in the mapping occurs, all is correct. The integration process jumps in to the exception branch and finishes  correct. But when use a multi mapping (1 to n; n to 1; n to m) and an error in the mapping occurs, then there is always an error in the bpe inbound queue.
    There must be some problem with the split-and-merge program. I think that the split-and-merge program handles the merging of n messages into 1. You can see this when you test a mapping in the integration builder designer. In a multi-mapping there you can see a xml-structure that envelopes the application messages, f. ex.:
    <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
       <ns0:Message1>
          <myMessage1>data</myMessage1>
       </ns0:Message1>
       <ns0:Message2>
          <myMessage2>data2</myMessage2>
       </ns0:Message2>
    </ns0:Messages>

Maybe you are looking for

  • Sending a text document as pdf by email.

    Hi, I have a plain text document that needs to be send as a pdf document by email. The line type of the text document is PC408-linda, which is 132-character length. I am trying to use the FM ‘SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1’ for sending the document wh

  • Fullscreen on multiple displays?

    hello everyone, i was wondering if it is at all possible to run a game or app (such as World of Warcraft, Logic, or safari) in full screen mode just on an external display, and have my regular desktop show up on my MacBook as normal. for instance if

  • Putting pictures on System 7.1 with floppy disk created on Windows PC

    Hi all, I have a Quadra 605 on system 7.1 that I've been experimenting with, would like to get some pictures transferred onto it. I tryed using apple file exchange which is on the Quadra to read a Windows DOS formatted disk with some pictures on it.

  • Best place for BI 7 Java elements

    Where from a performance and load perspective would it be best to place the Java elements of BI 7.0 On the portal built into BI7.0 or on the main portal?

  • How to disable instant preview?

    I've a Q5 with the latest OS upgrade of about 1 GB fone about a week or ten days ago. I'm now unable to disable the instant previews and have tried everything possible. I've even selected the "instant preview off" in the settings menu. It still doesn