Error in OM-PA Integration after upgrade

Hi All,
Recently we have upgraded our systems to EHP5.
We have observed, while deleting or delimiting the position
Relationship A-008 the corresponding changes are not reflecting in PA records. IT 0001.
After deletion, position field in IT 0001 should reflect with Default value 99999999.
Kindly help.
Regards,
Jailakshmi

Hi all,
we are facing an issue that have the same characteristics you described.
When carrying out organisational reassignment using PA40 sometimes OM is not updated accordingly leaving the employee on the old position or with two positions at the same time.
We do have the correct update in PA0001 (the system delimit and create the new record with the correct informations) but, some times, in a randomic way, we do not have the same update in hrp1001.
We cannot reproduce the error.
We upgraded to EHP5 on february 2012 and we applied the note 1560951 as SAP suggested the last Jenuary 2013 but we still have the issue.
So has someone fixed the issue and/or understand which is the problem?
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Maria Vittoria Nitoglia

Similar Messages

Oracle error "No message file for" after Upgrade to 10.2.0.5

After upgrade from 9.2.0.8 to 10.2.0.5 i get the following error "No message file for"
(with both Users sidadm and orasid)
Platform AIX 64 bit
The installation und Upgrade with dbua works fine.
DB and SAP runs after the Upgrade.
then I tried
SQL> select xx from v$log;
select xx from v$log
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: Message 904 not found; No message file for produstyle='font-
family:courier' ct=RDBMS,
facility=ORA; arguments: ["XX"]
The Environment is correct,
ORACLE_HOME,ORACLE_SID,PATH,LIBPATH have right Values.
I cant find any failure in Configuration or Install Logs.
So i tried the following:
Copy the complete Directorie /oracle/SID/102_64/rdbms/msg from a
10.2.0.4 Oracle Installation to the 10.2.0.5 home.
the result ist that the Messagefile could be read by Oracle an i get
the ORA-00904
Here the same Query:
SQL> select xx from v$log;
select xx from v$log
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00904: "XX": invalid identifier
So I do the same procedure with an other System.
I detect:
the Patch 9952230 (SAP_102051_201011/9952230) delivers
both Message Files oraus.msg and oraus.msb which caused the problem.
Has anyone the same Problem?
Are there any other Impacts with wrong Message Files .
I raised a OSS Call, but no answer till today.
best regards
Uwe

I could not find anything is sap notes, but oracle recommends to update binary file oraus.msb in $ORACLE_HOME/rdbms/mesg
Download link:
https://updates.oracle.com/ARULink/PatchDetails/process_form?patch_num=10235783
You can find more details also in:
https://support.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&id=10235783.8
https://support.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=BUG&id=10235783
The problem with this solution. It is not officially released by SAP.

Error AA662 in Asset accounting after upgrade to ECC 6

Hi,
After upgrade to ECC6 from R3 Enterprise, when we try to browse an asset, using transaction code AW01N, and go to posted values/Comparisons tab we get the following error:
SYST: You cannot change the depreciation periods
     Message no. AA662
Asset affected: 000000003983-0000
Diagnosis
    Processing terminated because the number of depreciation periods in company code 1100 has been changed. However, you cannot change the number of
    periods in your live (productive) system.
Procedure
    Change the depreciation periods back to the original value in company code 1100. The number of depreciation periods is determined by the fiscal year version and the use of half-periods. At least one of these parameters was changed.
     If you want to change your system so that you can now work with half-periods, you have to use depreciation keys with time-dependent period control in that company code.
    If you need to make general changes to the number of periods for calculating depreciation per fiscal year, you will have to consult your system administrator.
We were not getting this error in R3 enterprise. We have tried implementing sap note 1009699 but it does not resolve the issue. What we observed is, AA662 occurs if you change the number of period in the fiscal year version or the use of half-periods, after you have already posted to assets. The most common cause is a different value in field ANLB-PERFY which is the number of periods in the fiscal year. If the number entered here does not correspond to the number of posting periods of the fiscal year used, the system raises error AA662 (except for none posted areas for which ANLB-PERFY = 000 or areas with depreciation to the date for which ANLB-PERFY = 365). For us there are many assets with ANLB-PERFY=24.
Is there a way to fix this problem by some config change or data fix. If any of you have come across a similar issue or have any insights on the same, please respond back.
Regards,
Milan
([email protected])

Hi All,
I could not find any solution to fix this in new depreciation calculation method. I also did not get any help from SAP or SDN. So, we decided to switch back to the old calculation method.
There are 3 ways of implementing the old calculation.
1. SAP Note 984161 : Code change at ABAP level.
2. User Level : By setting the user parameter FAA_DC_SWITCH to OLD
3. By default Config : If we make an entry in V_TABWD_VID in SM30 and create a new entry with Acct. Transaction ID to 'AMBUAFAR000000000000', It should use old calculation method.
Thanks,
Milan
+1-310-691-3978
+91-994-571-5063

ERROR MESSAGE IN PPOME TCODE AFTER UPGRADE TO ECC 6.0

Hi Experts,
I have a question.
Recently our system went for upgrade and during testing phase we have found one issue.
Error message is appearing in PPOME transactio code after upgrade to ECC 6.0
The screen is getting defaulted to Budget section and unable to find the subtype as there are no subtypes available there and showing error message as "Fill in all required fields".
Please let me know your solution on this.
Regards,
Sekhar.

Hi,
- you can deactivate the budget tab in the IMG-activity 'Hide/Show Tab Page'
(SIMG_CFMENUOHP1HFW20 alternatively use SM30 on view 'T77OCTABUS')
1. Create new entries for the following KEY:
a) Scenario OME0
b) Object type 'P', 'O', 'S'
c) Tab Page 'PBC_ORIG'
2. for each of this entries, set the 'Exclude Tab Page'-Flag.
- in case you do not want to deactivate the Budget tab:
The error occurs due to missing entries for subtypes in table T778U
for infotype 1516.
Please maintain the according subtyes you want to use if you create a
budget.
Regards,
Ana

IDOC Syntax Error E0072 with status 26 after upgrade to ECC6.0

Hi
We have upgraded SAP R/3 from 4.6C to ECC6.0. After upgrade, when we create PO and output EDI, we are seeing this IDOC syntax error E0072 for Mandatory Segment E1EDK01. In 4.6C it was working fine with no issues, only after upgrade this problem started. It says E1EDK01 is missing which is mandatory. We are using basic type ORDERS01 with no extensions. When we see WE30 it looks fine, WE20 settings looks fine.
Order of the segments got scrambled in upgraded version. First segment is E1EDP19001, this is supposed to be under E1EDP01 segment. There are two E1EDP19001 segments created but there were no sub segments to E1EDP01.
Any help in this regard is highly appreciated.
Thanks
Pandiri

User Exit activation and fixing the issue in user exit fixed this issue.

Error UCD1038 regarding Movement Type after upgrade

During testing for the BW upgrade and implementation of BPC, the SEM-BCS data collection resulted in an unexpected and unnecessary error: Maximum selection does not contain value 600 of subassignment Movement Type; Message no. UCD1038.
Both before and after upgrade the task log shows Source records with the movement type but with no value in transaction currency, local currency and group currency. But after the upgrade these records also appear in the Target log where there had previously been excluded.
SAP Note 1583871 was implemented without any noticeable improvement.
The SEM-BCS data collection uses load-from-datastream with a source databasis that is virtual cube reading data from the ECC leading ledger. The source data is unchanged and before the upgrade the error did not occur.
The SAP components before the upgrade are:
SAP_ABA        700       0021 SAPKA70021     Cross-Application Component
SAP_BASIS      700       0021 SAPKB70021     SAP Basis Component
PI_BASIS       2006_1_7000011 SAPKIPYM11     Basis Plug-In (PI_BASIS) 2006_1_700
ST-PI          2008_1_7000004 SAPKITLRD4     SAP Solution Tools Plug-In
SAP_BW         700       0023 SAPKW70023     SAP NetWeaver BI 7.0
FINBASIS       603       0003 SAPK-60303INFINFINBASIS 603
BI_CONT        703       0016 SAPKIBIIQ6     Business Intelligence Content
SEM-BW         603       0003 SAPK-60303INSEMSEM-BW 603
ST-A/PI 01N_700BCO 0000      - Servicetools for other App./Netweaver 04
The SAP components after the upgrade are:
SAP_ABA        701       0007 SAPKA70107     Cross-Application Component
SAP_BASIS      701       0007 SAPKB70107     SAP Basis Component
PI_BASIS       701       0007 SAPK-70107INPIBBasis Plug-In
ST-PI          2008_1_7000004 SAPKITLRD4     SAP Solution Tools Plug-In
SAP_BS_FND     701       0007 SAPK-70107INSAPSAP Business Suite Foundation
SAP_BW         701       0007 SAPKW70107     SAP Business Warehouse
FINBASIS       604       0007 SAPK-60407INFINFINBASIS
BI_CONT        704       0007 SAPK-70407INBICBusiness Intelligence Content
CPMBPC 750 0006 SAPK-75006INCPMBPC CPM Business Planning and Consolidation
SEM-BW 604 0007 SAPK-60407INSEMBW SEM-BW
ST-A/PI 01N_700BCO 0000      - Servicetools for other App./Netweaver 04
Any help resolving this are greatly appreciated.

Hi Dan,
This can be resolved by activating modification as suggested in the note 1074599.
Suresh Jayanthi.

Errors with with portal providers after upgrading database to 10.2.0.3

Hello,
We are receiving errors when trying to do anything with providers that we have created in Portal. The problems have started after upgrading the underlying database from 10.1.0.4 to 10.2.0.3 on RH Linux 3.0. Our version of Portal is 10.1.2.0.1 and is running on SUSE 9.
If we try to select the 'Actions' button for any of the portlets that include custom providers, we get the following errors:
Internal error (WWC-00006)
An unexpected error occurred: User-Defined Exception (WWC-43000)
An unexpected error occurred: User-Defined Exception (WWC-43000)
The provider URL specified may be wrong or the provider is not running. (WWC-43176)
Likewise, if we try to deregister/reregister one of the providers, it asks us the following questions:
1. Do you want to deregister provider "Provider Name"?
Deregistering a provider removes it from the system. All usages of portlets from that provider will be deleted.
********We answer 'Yes' to this
2. The provider could not be contacted, do you still want to delete provider "Provider Name"?
The provider could not be contacted and its deregistration function was not initiated. Deleting the provider will remove it from the portal. Additional action may be necessary by the provider to remedy the failure to call its deregistration function.
********Again we answer 'Yes' to this. After answering yes, we get the following error:
Internal error (WWC-00006)
Unexpected error - ORA-04091: table PORTAL.WWPRO_PORTLET_METADATA$ is mutating, trigger/function may not see it
ORA-06512: at "PORTAL.WWUTL_EVENT", line 173
ORA-06512: at "PORTAL.WWPRO_PMR_NLS_EVENT_TRG", line 23
ORA-04088: error during execution of trigger 'PORTAL.WWPRO_PMR_NLS_EVENT_TRG' (WWC-35000)
All of the providers (4 of them) we have manually added (not seeded) receive the above errors, however 3 out of the 4 seem to function fine in the portal (if we don't try to modify). The fourth calls an external e-mail application, and this is not working.
The database upgrade has seemed to cause this issue, but I'm not sure why. Do we need to somehow upgrade these providers? Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Rick

Hi
This is AIX 5L specific problem.
Yo should modify 2 LINES of $CRS_HOME/bin/racgvip file
FROM :
O1=`$NETSTAT -n -I $IF | $AWK "{ if (/^$_IF/) {print \\$5; exit}}"`
O2=`$NETSTAT -n -I $IF | $AWK "{ if (/^$_IF/) {print \\$5; exit}}"`
TO:
O1=`$NETSTAT -n -I $IF | $AWK "{ if (/^$_IF/) {print \\$6; exit}}"`
O2=`$NETSTAT -n -I $IF | $AWK "{ if (/^$_IF/) {print \\$6; exit}}"`
briefly $5 --> $6
this is because of
#/usr/bin/netstat -f inet -n -I en1
command returns extra column ( ZoneID ) which RAC software is unaware
#/usr/bin/netstat -f inet -n -I en1
Name Mtu Network Address ZoneID Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
en1 1500 link#3 0.21.5e.34.55.bc - 35645 0 16801 3 0
en1 1500 10.46.180 10.46.180.52 - 35645 0 16801 3 0
for details goto
http://www.ubtools.com/jira/browse/QA-48
This solution stated by Danisment Gazi Unal.
Gokhan Tercan
ORacle DBA
Edited by: GokhanTercan on 19.Eki.2009 08:06

No Faces Integration after upgrading to Mountain Lion

After upgrading to Mountain Lion, I still don't get Faces integration in my photo picker whenever I choose a profile or contact picture. Does anyone know how I can enable this feature?
On the OS X Mountain Lion 200+ New Features page, it states:
Faces integration in photo picker
The photo picker now includes Faces, which displays all the pictures of you contained in your iPhoto library. So it’s easy to choose a photo for your account picture, Contacts card, or Messages account.

I just spent 2 hours on the phone with Apple's customer support.
It turns out, this seems to be an issue affecting part of the users. It will work for some, but not for others. After trouble shooting (we tried deleting the cache, reinstalling iPhoto, etc.), the senior advisor said he is unsure what is causing Faces integration to not appear and he is sending it to the engineers.
On the computers where Faces integration was working (this senior advisor said he tested all the computers that were around him), it only works with Contacts with the same name, as Redarm mentioned above.
If and when he follows up with me, I'll post his findings here.
Please note that this discussion is not about Facebook integration, it is about Faces (i.e. Faces in iPhoto) integration in the photo picker for Contacts and other apps. This is a feature that is already pushed out with Mountain Lion, but due to some unknown reason is not functional with all users.

Error while executing SSIS Package after upgrading the Oracle Client

Hello,
I am running to the below error after we upgraded the Oracle client to 11g from 10g. The source of the Data is Oracle database . Looked online but each error is pointing towards different route, Confused here any help is very much appreciated. Have to say
I am not a pro with SSIS.
SSIS package "Bentek_ISO_Package (2).dtsx" starting.
Information: 0x4004300A at Temp_tbl Injection Data Flow Task, SSIS.Pipeline: Validation phase is beginning.
Information: 0x4004300A at Temp_tbl Injection Data Flow Task, SSIS.Pipeline: Validation phase is beginning.
Warning: 0x80049304 at Temp_tbl Injection Data Flow Task, SSIS.Pipeline: Warning: Could not open global shared memory to communicate with performance DLL; data flow performance counters are not available. To resolve, run this package as an administrator,
or on the system's console.
Information: 0x40043006 at Temp_tbl Injection Data Flow Task, SSIS.Pipeline: Prepare for Execute phase is beginning.
Information: 0x40043007 at Temp_tbl Injection Data Flow Task, SSIS.Pipeline: Pre-Execute phase is beginning.
Error: 0xC0202009 at Temp_tbl Injection Data Flow Task, OLE DB Source [1]: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_OLEDBERROR. An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80040E14.
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "OraOLEDB" Hresult: 0x80040E14 Description: "ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P183, instance *****:qrmgmt2 (2)
ORA-01861: literal does not match format string".
An OLE DB record is available. Source: "OraOLEDB" Hresult: 0x80004005 Description: "ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P183, instance ****:qrmgmt2 (2)
ORA-01861: literal does not match format string".
Error: 0xC004701A at Temp_tbl Injection Data Flow Task, SSIS.Pipeline: component "OLE DB Source" (1) failed the pre-execute phase and returned error code 0xC0202009.
Information: 0x4004300B at Temp_tbl Injection Data Flow Task, SSIS.Pipeline: "component "OLE DB Destination" (52)" wrote 0 rows.
Information: 0x40043009 at Temp_tbl Injection Data Flow Task, SSIS.Pipeline: Cleanup phase is beginning.
Task failed: Temp_tbl Injection Data Flow Task
Warning: 0x80019002 at *******: SSIS Warning Code DTS_W_MAXIMUMERRORCOUNTREACHED. The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (2) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure. This occurs when the number of errors reaches
the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors.
SSIS package "****** (2).dtsx" finished: Failure.

Do you have any Date conversion functions in your Oracle datetime fields? I did run into a similar issue when we upgraded the oracle client and the provider started to decipher the metadata of the date columns. The SSIS metadata conversion for the date
columns yielded dates that were not valid. I had to update my queries to use the TO_CHAR conversion to bring it out as a string and then save it to the date field.
TO_CHAR (DATE, 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS')
Regards, Dinesh

Unknown error (-50) occurs upon startup after upgrade to iTunes 7.0.2

I just let AutoUpdate upgrade iTunes to version 7.0.2 (along with the iChat upgrade and last two security fixes), and after restarting my computer, I can no longer open the iTunes. Upon clicking the dock icon, I am asked to agree/disagree with the iTunes Software License Agreement (so I agree), and then get the error: "The iTunes application could not be opened. An unknown error occurred (-50)." I tried repairing permissions, which apparently found some discrepancies with files associated with iTunes, but it did nothing to solve the problem. What should I do?? Would downgrading to iTunes 7 fix it? (I don't remember whether I had ever made the upgrade to 7.0.1).
Thanks,
Jenna
Powerbook G4 1.33GHz Mac OS X (10.4.8)

Ended up moving the whole iTunes library and plists to another folder and starting iTunes, then copying the iTunes music library and xml back into the folder to replace the newly created ones. Seems to be working and the play counts/playlists are intact. In case anyone else happens to have a similar error...

InfoPackage error for Hierarchy data loads after upgrading to BI 7.31

Hi All,
We have recently upgraed to BI 7.31 from BI 7.01. After the upgrade we are observing info package error while loading the Hierarchy for 0BPARTNER infoobject, below is the long text for the error message.
Datasource name : 0BPARTNER_NAME_HIER
Error in the hierarchy structure: see error log
Message no. RH003
Diagnosis
The structure of the hierarchy contains errors. You can find a detailed description of the error in the log.
Procedure
Correct the error in the hierarchy structure as described in the log.
Screenshot for the Infopackage Details tab,
The error message suggests checking the error log, but there are no error logs to be reffered.
Please let us know if anyone have faced similar issue and help us resolving the same. Also let us know where to find the error log in such scenario.
We have already tried replicating the data source at BW side, but no success. We also checked the extractor at source system side and found it to be working alright.
Thanks & Regards,
Viraj

Hi Viraj,
Did you find a solution for your problem ?
Even am facing the same issue .Process chain is running fine without throwing any errors but if i try to run manually it getting failed.
when we check the data few of the nodes are not getting reflected which are maintained in source.
Error Message : Error in the hierarchy structure.
Source system : Extraction check performed and the record count is matching. We took the dump of data and where able to find the required data but in the maintain hierarchies it is not getting reflected
Could you please help me in the solution.
Thank you
Regards,
Madhav

Strange error regarding libmlib.so.2 after upgrading to gcc3.4.6

Hello everyone,
I just upgraded my sparc Solaris 10 system to gcc3.4.6, plus a BUNCH of additional tools and libraries that rely on gcc3.4.6 libraries, from www.sunfreeware.com. I'm now getting a very strange error on a few of the tools, regarding the libmlib.so.2 library.
For example, when attempting to run gtk-demo, I'm getting the following:
sun440:root# gtk-demo
ld.so.1: gtk-demo: fatal: libmlib.so.2: version `SUNW_2.3' not found (required by file /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0)
ld.so.1: gtk-demo: fatal: libmlib.so.2: open failed: No such file or directory
Killed
If I do an ldd on gtk-demo, this is what I see:
sun440:root# ldd /usr/local/bin/gtk-demo
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/lib/libXrandr.so.2
libXext.so.0 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.0
libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0
libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0
libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
libiconv.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.2
libcairo.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libcairo.so.2
libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1
libfreetype.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.6
libexpat.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.0
libpng12.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpng12.so.0
libz.so => /usr/local/lib/libz.so
libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1
libSM.so.6 => /usr/lib/libSM.so.6
libICE.so.6 => /usr/lib/libICE.so.6
libX11.so.4 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.4
libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1
libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2
libmlib.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmlib.so.2
libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1
libmlib.so.2 (SUNW_2.3) => (version not found)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
libmlib.so.2 (SUNW_2.3) => (version not found)
libXrender.so.1 (RENDER_0.6) => (version not found)
libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8
libsec.so.1 => /lib/libsec.so.1
libdl.so.1 => /lib/libdl.so.1
libmp.so.2 => /lib/libmp.so.2
libmd.so.1 => /lib/libmd.so.1
libscf.so.1 => /lib/libscf.so.1
libavl.so.1 => /lib/libavl.so.1
libdoor.so.1 => /lib/libdoor.so.1
libuutil.so.1 => /lib/libuutil.so.1
libgen.so.1 => /lib/libgen.so.1
/usr/lib/cpu/sparcv9+vis2/libmlib.so.2
/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440/lib/libc_psr.so.1
/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-V440/lib/libmd_psr.so.1
I am also getting this same error repeatedly when trying to run Firefox 3.6. Any ideas? I do have this library installed:
sun440:root# ls -la /usr/lib/libmlib*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Nov 15 2006 /usr/lib/libmlib.so -> ./libmlib.so.2
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 20260528 Jan 22 2005 /usr/lib/libmlib.so.2
Any ideas? It's very frustrating. Thanks in advance,
jeff davey

I don't understand how that would help. libmlib.so.2 is not part of gcc, it's from Sun package SUNWmlib. There is no libmlib.so.2 as part of the gcc or gcclibs packages from sunfreeware.
I did do a search for all instances of libmlib.so.2, and I got the following results:
./usr/lib/sparcv9/libmlib.so.2
./usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus/libmlib.so.2
./usr/lib/cpu/sparcv8plus+vis/libmlib.so.2
./usr/lib/cpu/sparcv9+vis/sparcv9/libmlib.so.2
./usr/lib/cpu/sparcv9+vis2/sparcv9/libmlib.so.2
./usr/lib/cpu/sparcv9+vis2/libmlib.so.2
./usr/lib/libmlib.so.2
./opt/SUNWmlib/lib/libmlib.so.2
./opt/SUNWmlib/lib/sparcv8/libmlib.so.2
./opt/SUNWmlib/lib/sparcv8plus/libmlib.so.2
./opt/SUNWmlib/lib/sparcv8plus+vis/libmlib.so.2
./opt/SUNWmlib/lib/sparcv8plus+vis2/libmlib.so.2
./opt/SUNWmlib/lib/sparcv9/libmlib.so.2
./opt/SUNWmlib/lib/sparcv9+vis/libmlib.so.2
./opt/SUNWmlib/lib/sparcv9+vis2/libmlib.so.2
Then, as a test, I updated my LD_LIBRARY_PATH to incorporate the paths so the various versions would be seen first, and it did not make any difference. I keep getting this when running ldd on gtk-demo:
libmlib.so.2 (SUNW_2.3) => (version not found)
libmlib.so.2 (SUNW_2.3) => (version not found)
libXrender.so.1 (RENDER_0.6) => (version not found)
I'm also confused about the libXrender not being found as well. Can anyone else shed some light on this? Thanks!

Xclock Error: Can't open display: - after upgrading to openSSH 5.2p1

I have got two servers apssvrX and apssvrZ on OEL. Both were built by the same team using their standard build scripts.
Having received the servers I had installed Oracle (ODI) product on it successfully.
Then as a part of requirement and as per Oracle support's advise, I had upgraded the ssh version on apssvrX server from OpenSSH_4.3p2 To OpenSSH_5.2p1, so that, I can implement the chroot jailing.
As per Oracle advise, I had downloaded the 3 RPMs from "_http://layer1.rack911.com/openssh/rhel5/x86_64/" to run them on my first server i.e., apssvrX and then configured the sshd services following the below steps:
a) Modify /etc/ssh/sshd_config to comment the below line:
#Subsystem sftp /usr/libexec/openssh/sftp-server
b) Add below lines:
Subsystem sftp internal-sftp
Match Group sftponly
ChrootDirectory %h
X11Forwarding no
AllowTcpForwarding no
ForceCommand internal-sftp
Then lastly, Restart sshd services complete the configuration
# /etc/init.d/sshd restart
apssvrX server current details are as below:
apssvrX$ uname -a
Linux apssvrX 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 21 08:45:05 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
apssvrX$ ssh -V
OpenSSH_5.2p1, OpenSSL 0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 01 Jul 2008
My problems started from this point onwards. I want to install another Oracle product using OUI, but when I try to execute xclock using the Exceed HummingBird tool on apssvrX server then it fails with the error - (xclock) Error: Can't open display:
I tried the DISPLAY variable setup as well but to no use.
Whereas I can successfully execute the xclock on apssvrZ and OUI as well. Its config details are as below:
apssvrZ$ uname -a
Linux apssvrZ 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 21 08:45:05 EST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
apssvrZ$ ssh -V
OpenSSH_4.3p2, OpenSSL 0.9.8e-fips-rhel5 01 Jul 2008
Please advise the way forward.

Tried but still same error.
Affected servers's sshd_config is as below:
[root@apssvrX]# cat /etc/ssh/sshd_config
# $OpenBSD: sshd_config,v 1.73 2005/12/06 22:38:28 reyk Exp $
# This is the sshd server system-wide configuration file. See
# sshd_config(5) for more information.
# This sshd was compiled with PATH=/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin
# The strategy used for options in the default sshd_config shipped with
# OpenSSH is to specify options with their default value where
# possible, but leave them commented. Uncommented options change a
# default value.
#Port 22
Protocol 2
Protocol 2
#AddressFamily any
#ListenAddress 0.0.0.0
#ListenAddress ::
# HostKey for protocol version 1
#HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key
# HostKeys for protocol version 2
#HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key
#HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key
# Lifetime and size of ephemeral version 1 server key
#KeyRegenerationInterval 1h
#ServerKeyBits 768
# Logging
# obsoletes QuietMode and FascistLogging
#SyslogFacility AUTH
SyslogFacility AUTHPRIV
#LogLevel INFO
# Authentication:
#LoginGraceTime 2m
PermitRootLogin without-password
#StrictModes yes
#MaxAuthTries 6
#RSAAuthentication yes
#PubkeyAuthentication yes
#AuthorizedKeysFile .ssh/authorized_keys
# For this to work you will also need host keys in /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts
#RhostsRSAAuthentication no
# similar for protocol version 2
#HostbasedAuthentication no
# Change to yes if you don't trust ~/.ssh/known_hosts for
# RhostsRSAAuthentication and HostbasedAuthentication
#IgnoreUserKnownHosts no
# Don't read the user's ~/.rhosts and ~/.shosts files
#IgnoreRhosts yes
# To disable tunneled clear text passwords, change to no here!
#PasswordAuthentication yes
#PermitEmptyPasswords no
PasswordAuthentication yes
# Change to no to disable s/key passwords
#ChallengeResponseAuthentication yes
ChallengeResponseAuthentication no
# Kerberos options
#KerberosAuthentication no
#KerberosOrLocalPasswd yes
#KerberosTicketCleanup yes
#KerberosGetAFSToken no
# GSSAPI options
#GSSAPIAuthentication no
GSSAPIAuthentication yes
#GSSAPICleanupCredentials yes
GSSAPICleanupCredentials yes
# Set this to 'yes' to enable PAM authentication, account processing,
# and session processing. If this is enabled, PAM authentication will
# be allowed through the ChallengeResponseAuthentication mechanism.
# Depending on your PAM configuration, this may bypass the setting of
# PasswordAuthentication, PermitEmptyPasswords, and
# "PermitRootLogin without-password". If you just want the PAM account and
# session checks to run without PAM authentication, then enable this but set
# ChallengeResponseAuthentication=no
#UsePAM no
UsePAM yes
# Accept locale-related environment variables
AcceptEnv LANG LC_CTYPE LC_NUMERIC LC_TIME LC_COLLATE LC_MONETARY LC_MESSAGES
AcceptEnv LC_PAPER LC_NAME LC_ADDRESS LC_TELEPHONE LC_MEASUREMENT
AcceptEnv LC_IDENTIFICATION LC_ALL
#AllowTcpForwarding yes
#GatewayPorts no
#X11Forwarding no
X11Forwarding yes
#X11DisplayOffset 10
#X11UseLocalhost yes
#PrintMotd yes
#PrintLastLog yes
#TCPKeepAlive yes
#UseLogin no
#UsePrivilegeSeparation yes
#PermitUserEnvironment no
#Compression delayed
#ClientAliveInterval 0
#ClientAliveCountMax 3
#ShowPatchLevel no
#UseDNS yes
#PidFile /var/run/sshd.pid
#MaxStartups 10
#PermitTunnel no
# no default banner path
#Banner /some/path
# override default of no subsystems
Subsystem sftp /usr/libexec/openssh/sftp-server
## Commented the sftp jailing configuration
##Subsystem sftp internal-sftp
##Match Group sftponly
## ChrootDirectory %h
## X11Forwarding no
## AllowTcpForwarding no
## ForceCommand internal-sftp

Error on conditional mapping script after upgrading from 9.3.1 to 11.1.2.1

We have the following error while importing the data file on one location. The script is sitting on the Account Like mapping. It was working fine on 9.3.1 but not working on 11.1.2.1.
Even after I removed the Case statement (so just leave the Ifxxxxx,Thenxxxx,Elsexxx,End If), it still doesn't work.
Can anyone help please? Thank you !
Error: An error occurred running the script:
13 - Type mismatch: 'VarValues'
At Line: 12
Select Case VarValues(13) ‘Special Accounts
Case "46221000","40974000","46713300","46747000","47111900","47414010","46871200"
If VarValues(9)>0 Then
RESULT="12009000"
Else
RESULT="20023490"
End If
Case "41110120","40119160","47311200"
If VarValues(9)>0 Then
RESULT="12009000"
Else
RESULT="20023490"
End If
End Select

Have you tried converting the value of the amount to a double? I just went up to 11.1.2.2 and had a similar problem when referencing the amount and using a number.
Select Case VarValues(13) ‘Special Accounts
Case "46221000","40974000","46713300","46747000","47111900","47414010","46871200"
If CDBL(VarValues(9))>0 Then
RESULT="12009000"
Else
RESULT="20023490"
End If
Case "41110120","40119160","47311200"
If CDBL(VarValues(9))>0 Then
RESULT="12009000"
Else
RESULT="20023490"
End If
End Select
Regards
JTF

IOS 6.0 error message upon setting up after upgrade

Any body else getting "An SSL error has occurred and secure connection to server can not be made" error message. Happening to both my iPhone 4S and iPad (III)
Typical Apple first day upgrade issues! Anybody beta test software these days?

Dude, relax. There are probably millions of people trying to update their iPhones at the same time. Who cares about the error. It can be corrected. Don't want to have the issues, wait a few days.

Error in OM-PA Integration after upgrade

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for