ERROR in PI : No sender agreement found for , , , , ,

Hello everybody,
i'm working with SAP PI 7.1
it's a new installation.
I created the first easy interface JDBC-Pi-File.
when i activate the CC i don't see any message in SXMB_MONI but in RWM i see the messages in Waiting status and when i look inside i see the follow error:
SOAPFAULT received from Integration Server. ErrorCode/Category: XIServer/INBOUND_BINDING_ERROR; Params: BS_CSIS_DEV, http://xxxx.com/test, SI_DB2SP_DOCUMENTS_AA_02; AdditionalText: null; ApplicationFaultMessage: null; ErrorStack: Error in sender agreement for party , service BS_CSIS_DEV, interface namespace http://xxx.com/test interface SI_DB2SP_DOCUMENTS_AA_02 No sender agreement found for , , , , ,
1-Configuration is ok. I create all steps and sender Agreement exist
2-end point http://yyyyy:50100/sap/xi/engine?type=entry is correct and the same in SLD and sxmb_adm -> Integration Engine Configuration
3-i suppose 50100 port is correct because when i try to use 8010 port i have a different error.
4- i alreadi used CPA cache refresh and SXI_CACHE.
Any suggestion?
thanks

after 20 minuts i retry.
Now the error message is changed:
Transmitting the message to endpoint http://yyyyyy:8010/sap/xi/engine?type=entry using connection JDBC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: Error transmitting the message over HTTP. Reason: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused.
Edited by: apederiva on Aug 25, 2010 11:35 AM

Similar Messages

IDOC to FTP File - Error : SAP:Stack No receiver agreement found for send

Hello Friends,
I need to configure a senario Idoc to FTP File, Í did required settings in R3 and in PI... , did mapping and configuratino in PI... and when I send my idoc I got error msg in monitor
<SAP:Stack>No receiver agreement found for sender ,BMG_ASN_File_Component to receiver ,GTN_224,http://adis-bmg.de/asn,SI_BMG_ASN</SAP:Stack>
I search the fourm but did not got my answer, me just a bit confused...
In my senario I have having followings:
1. Bussiness System ( RFT : sender R3 system). ( I have define a party and make a connection under Idoc Partner )
2. Bussiness Component ( ZTEST_COMP as on Reciever side is File Server, so I define the reciver as bussiness component )
3. Communicatin Channel
    File with protocol FTP having communicatin component as my Bussiness Component ( reciver ). there I defied the required info for FTP
4. Reciever Determination
    Sender:
    - RFT
    - Idoc-Interface
    - urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
   Reciever
    communication party = space
    communicatin component = ZTEST_COMP
    Configure Reciever:
   There I again define the communication component as ( ZTEST_COMP)
5. Interface Determination
    -RFT
    - Idoc-Interface
    - urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
   Reviever:
    ZTEST_COMP
and define the mapping which I did in design ( although I have seen some threads where mentioned we dont need maaping in this case ) ?
6. Reciver agrement
sender:
- RFT
Reviver:
- ZTEST_COMP
- SI interface ( SI_BMG_ASN )
- http://test-etc.de/asn
and included my CC for file .....
Now when I send Idoc I got error msg that Reciver is not found : am I dong something wrong ? do I have to defien a bussiness system instead of Bussiness Component ?
Pls suggest...

( I have define a party and make a connection under Idoc Partner
Do you really need a party in your communication? Should it not be a partly-less communication.
In the receiver agreement ensure that you have included the inbound message interface.
communication party = space
No need to give any space.
In the Interface Determination i hope that you have included the receiver meessage interface and then the corresponding Interface Mapping.
If still not works then make some dummy changes and again activate....correspondingly check the cache status of the ID-objects
Regards,
Abhishek.

"No receiver agreement found" for BPM ???

Hi everybody
I think this could be an issue in the cache. I have a ccBPM and when I am sending the message who starts the BPM to the Integration Engine I got the following error:
<SAP:Stack>No receiver agreement found for sender -BS_SQL_Database to receiver -IP_ScanningStatus_01,http://xxxx.com/common/scanning.MI_JDBC_Response_Asyn_ABS</SAP:Stack>
IP_ScanningStatus_01 is an integration process and you do not need a receiver agreement ("not required" in receiver determination) to send a message to an integration process. Two weeks ago the process work and the very strange is, that in sxi_cache it shows the 31.07.2006 as last change/activation, but I did an activation yesterday. A full cache refresh did not change anything and the status of the cache is "up to date". We are on SP14 (:-<)
Regards Oliver

Hi Udo
yes, that is exacly my problem.
I deleted the corresponding processes in the repository and in the configuration. I recreated the process in the repository under the same name and after that I tried to import the porces in the configuration under the same name, but now I got the following error:
Unable to transport object Integration Process IP_ScanningStatus_01 | http://xxxx.com/common/scanning (CE_ONESAP_ACETATE_MFG_xx, 1.0 of celanese.com) of type RepBProcess from application REPOSITORY on system REPOSITORY. Detailed information: Attempt to serialize the generic part of object Integration Process IP_ScanningStatus_01 | http://xxx.com/common/scanning failed(serialization problem)
Any Ideas?
How can I delete the old process out of cache?
Regards Oliver

No suitable sender agreement found !!!

Hi,
I have created a sender file adapter and associated it with sender agreement. Now Im getting the error "No suitable sender agreement found".. I have activated all the associated objects and did complete cache refresh using SXI_CACHE..
Any thoughts..
- Ramani

Hi,
Performed below steps:
1. Checked all the MI, namespaces,etc in Sender Agreement.. Sender File Adapter.
2. The Sender File Adapter is activated and associated with Sender Agreement.
3. Did Complete refresh using SXI_CACHE.
Still I can see the error message "No suitable sender agreement found" under the Comm Channel.
Thanks
Ramani

Error in BPM (No receiver agreement found from sender to bpm)

Hi all
In a simple bpm scenario, I am getting a error that No receiver agreement found for sender service to bpm integration process.
What might be the reason?

your configuration should like this.
say u are doing File to File using BPM
File to BPM
then BPM to File.
so u need to create RD where sender is fileservice and receiver is BPM.
second u hav to create another RD where BPM is sender and Fileserviceis receiver.
So there should be
one Sender Ag
two RD
two ID
one RA.
Thanks
Farooq.

CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_NOT_FOUND and No receiver agreement found for Sender

Hi,
I had imported an RFC in to two different SWCV. In ID I'm able to see the RFC interface listed under one of the business systems but not in the other. Please help me out with this.
When i tested the scenario i got this error.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_NOT_FOUND</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>-WB_APDRP_DEV_ISU_200</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>-WB_APDRP_DEV_CCC,urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions.ZPI_CONSUMER_PAYMENT_BILL_DATA</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>No receiver agreement found for sender -WB_APDRP_DEV_ISU_200 to receiver -WB_APDRP_DEV_CCC,urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions.ZPI_CONSUMER_PAYMENT_BILL_DATA</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I cleared the cache using SXI_CACHE and http://Server Name:Port/CPACache/refresh?mode=full and still got this error. Can someone explain me about this..
Regards
Satt

Hi ,
This error generally Comes when aggrements are Not There in ID.
1. Check if all the Objects in ID are activated.
2. First test your Configuration Objects IN ID Only ( Tools - test Configuration )
if this gets Successful , Please tell...
Regards
Prabhat Sharma.

RWB error: no suitable sender agreement found

Hi Experts,
my scenario is File to proxy...
i am developed end to end scenario
i am using single stack i.e AAE
while checking in RWB it gives the error : no suitable sender agreement found
how to solve this error...
please help me on this..
Thanks&Regards
E.Ravi chandra reddy

Hi Ravi,
Please follow the steps in this blog if you want to send messages to an ICO using RWB
HowTo - Send Test Messages to the Adapter Engine (to an Integrated Configuration)
Hope this helps,
Mark

No standard agreement found for BS_A ,, BS_B

Hi Experts,
We are getting a very common error " No standard agreement found for BS_A ,, BS_B https://abc.com,SIOA_forcast,,,
There interface was succsfully executing few days back.
Here are some information abount the interafce.
1) JMS to IDOC
2) IDoc control record mapping
When i checked the pipe line steps in MONI , starngely it is showing
SAME SENDER interface name SIOA_forcast in sender and receiver interface . And thus it got failed in reciver agreent. I could not see the Idoc and IDoc namespace
I have searched in SDN but, did not get any clear picture
I have done the following
1) checked SXI_CAHCE and cahche instance if every object.
All objects are up -to-date
2) Deleted and recreated ID objects
3) Check the interfaces in message mapping , operation mapping , interface determination etc..., all are looking fine.
DId anyone faced this issue before.
I have asked basis for a full refresh , but i am not confident wheather that will solve the issue or not.
Please provide your valuable input and let me understand the issue.

Hi Sam
Was anything changed during last few days?
PI is not able to determine receiver interface and keeps sender inteface details. For this reason it can't find receiver agreement.
Check that your interface determination object is correct and perform a full cache refresh.
Also copy your message payload from SXMB_MONI and use the test tool (Tools -> Test configuration) in ID.
Regards,
Giuseppe

No suitable sender agreement found - File / Adapter, Sender FTP

Hi SDN Friends,
Is my first time in PI with FTP / FILE ( really I'm newbie in PI - but 2 years in ABAP ).
I have configurated my communication channel with and FILE/ADAPTER on a Sender FTP...
I have Tried with 2 FTP, one in my PC, and one Public... but in both cases, it's doesn't works... monitoring my communication channel, I get the No suitable sender agreement found ERROR....
I thought... may be PI has not access to the FTP's servers, so run in SAP PI server, an ABAP program trx se38, program: RSFTP002 and with this, I could connect to the FTP... it works perfectly.
so I don't understand... what I'm doing bad?
Any Help?
regards every body!

u r welcome...2 yrs back i am newbie
when ever we make changes after an error, sometimes XI will not take the changes in cache automatically; uses old one. solution for this is complete Cache refresh.
welcome to Integration World have fun....

No standard agreement found for receiver

HI,
I am doing File to Multiple files (3 )bases on Identifer
Each and Every File of receiver has Different Communication component.
I am doing Multimapping to split based on the condition.
1) Created 1 Sender Agreement
2) Created 1 Receiver Determination Given all the receiver component (3) in configured receivers
3) Created 1 Interface Determination , called the Operation mapping which contains all the 3 Service interfaces including Multimapping.
4) Created 3 Receiver communication channels.
But I am getting Following error
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_ERROR</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>-TR</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>-XXX_60,http://TEST</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText>No standard agreement found for , TR, , XXX_60, http://test,
Thanks in advance

Hi Sap pixi ,
Try to create the scenario like this ,
1) Create 1 Sender Agreement
2) Create 1 Receiver Determinationwith all the receiver components (3) in configured receivers along with the conditions.
3) Create 3 Interface Determination .
4)3 mappings ,3 Operation mapping , 3 Service interfaces .
4) Create 3 Receiver communication channels.
Try the above scenario as the multi-mapping is not working for you,I tried the same for two different communication components, with no conditions in receiver determination and its working fine .
Regards,
Lavanya.B

Error message - "Overlapping validity areas were found for country BR"

Hi Experts,
For a certain output type Y953 (e.g. for the shipment 2002355665 related to the DN 3087912658), an error message "Overlapping validity areas were found for country BR" is coming in as error.
The error message is appearing during the idoc processing of the shipment.
This is an incident of Dangerous Goods.
I would like to know if it is technically / functionally possible to find out as to why exactly this mesage is coming and how can we rectify the problem.
From technical point of view we checked that this message was not being called in the SAP system but was dynamically called.
kindly let me know of any breakthrough as this issue is critical as dangerous goods are being transported without needed documents printed.
Thanks in advance.
RIttik

Check whether note 836139 helps you.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

XML Form Error: java.lang.RuntimeException: No system found for alias

Hello,
We are currently having an issue with our XML forms. When we try to access our XML forms we receive the following error:
java.lang.RuntimeException: No system found for alias SAP_R3_QWA
Is there a place within the forms to set the system alias?

Hi Jereme,
Have you installed the DMS Connector for KM?
I can imagine that this issue is related to an incorrect version of the DMS Connector for KM (regardless of whether you are using the DSMRM or not).
In that case you can do the following to correct the issue:
1) Undeploy your current version of 'DMS Connector for KM'
2) Download the latest version of 'DMS Connector for KM' from Service Marketplace and deploy it to your portal
3) Restart J2EE engine after deployment
Hope this helps,
Robert

No Receiver agreement found for Sender

Hello,
I have a scenario like this : sending an IDoc from R/3 4.6c to R/3 4.7 through XI 3.0.
I am struck up with the follwoing Error in SXMB_MONI
"outbound binding exception: No outbound binding found for , R46, , ENT, urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages, ORDERS.ORDERS04"
The Complete TRACE is as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="IDX_INBOUND_XMB" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">ALE-AUDIT-IDoc-Inbound Handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">IDoc-Inbound-Handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Syntax-Check-Flag X</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">IDoc-Tunnel-Flag X</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queueid</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="IDX_IDOC_TO_XML">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get the Metadata for port SAPR46</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Convert Segment-Definitions to Types</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Make Syntax check of actual Idoc</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Set Receiver Routing-object</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_RESOURCE-SET_IDOC" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Exit Function IDX_INBOUND_XMB</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_RESOURCE-GETBLOBDATA">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_RESOURCE-ITAB_TO_BINARY" />
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is expected by application !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = XI3</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 800</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = SMART01</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2004-12-27T20:08:46Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = F0EAB201EEA5F74A814EF22C32394FD0</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0009</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0009</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = XI3</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 800</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = SMART01</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2004-12-27T20:08:46Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO____0000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = XI3</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 800</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = SMART01</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2004-12-27T20:08:46Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">No mapping required</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_RESOURCE-GETBLOBDATA" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_OUTBOUND_BINDING" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">processing the outbound binding</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">search outbound bindings</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">outbound binding exception: No outbound binding found for , R46, , ENT, urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages, ORDERS.ORDERS04</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
</SAP:Trace>
I have made neccesary Configurations for the Receiver agreement in the Configuration Directory...
Anybody could please help me out...
Regards,
Romit Arun Shankar

Hi Frank,
Many Thanks for your reply.The problem got sorted out and the IDoc(ORDERS04) which i send in SAP 4.6c gets into SAP 4.7 AS ORDERS04 but i have a new problem now....
I didnt use any mappings until now...but now i have to have the segment E1EDK14 filled up for Sales organisation, Distribution Channel, Division details as well as the material number. These segments will not be filled up when a PO is sent from the source system.These segments has to be filled only in the XI system...Is it ? or is there any other solution for it....
Now how we can have this segment E1EDK14 which can occur any number of times with constant values for SORG,DV,DC in the mapping process....
Waiting for ur replies....
Bye,
Romit Shankar Arun.
For this

LIBOVD ERROR - "validateContextToken: workflow session was not found for given context. Create a new workflow session with token"

Hello everyone,
I have the following scenario:
We're using "Oracle SOA Suite 11g 11.1.1.7.0" (Patched w/ 17893896) mainly for a BPM/Human workflow composite. Former, we were having the error bellow:
<Mar 16, 2015 1:13:03 PM BRT> <Error> <oracle.soa.services.workflow.query> <BEA-000000> <<.> Verification Service cannot resolve user identity. User weblogic cannot be found in the identity repository. Workflow Context token cannot be null in request.
ORABPEL-30511
When that error ocurred, no one was able to use the system (BPM/Human Workflow).
I opened an SR, and after some analysis from the support, it recommended me to set up "virtualize=true" in EM, and restarting the domain. Then it started logging the following:
connection to ldap://[10.200.10.57]:7001 as cn=Admin.
javax.naming.NamingException: No LDAP connection available to process request for DN: cn=Admin.
Looking up on support KB, I found this note Doc ID 1545680.1 and increased from Max size of Connection Pool 10 to 200. That did work successfully! Problem now is that the <SERVER>_diagnostic.log is being filled up with the following error:
[2015-03-31T16:03:46.421-03:00] [soa_server2] [ERROR] [] [oracle.soa.services.workflow.verification] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '19' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: <anonymous>] [ecid: e0194e38aa6c9a2f:39fc1ff9:14c5def5247:-8000-00000000000a5653,0] [APP: soa-infra] <.> validateContextToken: workflow session was not found for given context. Create a new workflow session with token=51490173-e3d0-41dd-ae99-983915aa8454;;G;;Z+P7Oe9ABnoTUQD9ECryEW2l0/8yRcqPDyZsOWBCuzMmRgA3Qsj601TxmWQ87z2MjuwW5AH+KzgjIwkPmhJFdpc1FrE6Y/MrN1bxIDHJWu2/zP3iSNwKD07hRrh/U37Ea0TvaQyuaHJIog9y3Ptmzw==
One important point is that we're using only the embedded WLS ldap. So I am not 100% sure if we should be using the virtualize flag=true, once all docs I read point out that this should be done when using multi-ldap providers.
Also, I only got this error in the "diagnostic.log".
Although, no user has complained about using the system, I really want to work it out. Anyone has any suggestions?
Thanks in advance!

I have moved your thread from Certification to SOA Suite to get proper assistance.
Thanks,
Lisa

Error. in WS Navigator - no endpoints found for interface

Dear Friends,
I have created a new Enterprise Service Interface and implemented in ABAP. After the implementation I used SOAMANAGER to create the endpoint and publish the service using WSPUBLISH to Service Registry. When I tested this service from SOA Management application(SOAMANAGER), the endpoint is working very good, but when I am testing this service from Service Registry, it is now showing any endpoint in the 'Enter Input Parameters' Step. Also when I am trying to search the Service by using 'Search by Logical Destination', it shows the Service and when I select it, it shows an error message, "no endpoints found for interface (<namespace>/document)<Service Interface Name>_Document".
If some one knows about this issue, please advice me to do next steps.
Also I am planning to call this service from Visual Composer, I have configured the two logical destinations over there, also the service registry, even though, when i am searching the service, it shows an error like "Could not complete search".
Please advice me for the above issue also.
Thanks in advance
Vipindas

Hi,
If you have configured and tested from SOAMANAGER (which opens WSnavigator) then it is configured correctly. May be you are using wrong WSDL address.
Copy url of wsdl from SOAMANGER test screen and use it directly in WSnavigator for testing.
Regarding publishing of service WSPUBLISH should be able to publish correct service into service registry, but if for any reason it is not working then you can "publish" it directly from service registry by using publish option and provide url of wsdl from above option.
If for any reason VC is unable to search service registry then create destination template for your every service by providing WSDL and use it in VC.
Regards,
Gourav

ERROR in PI : No sender agreement found for , , , , ,

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for