Error in time evaluation

Dear All,
time evaluation is throwing an error msg "No entry in table T001P for key" for only one employee in the time evaluation display log.
Its happening in the initialization part in time evaluation. for example,
If i run the time evaluation for the month of 01.01.2009 to 24.02.2009. error message throwing on the initialization of 01.02.2009.
I have checked all the groupings in table V_001P_all.  All are correct.
Where should i do the correction. Pls
Br.
Manjula

Hi Sikindar,
I have checked all grouping in V_T001P_All  every think is correct,
And how can i check with grouping with dates??
This employee getting error message only in the initilation part in time evaluation log.
example if i run the time evaluation from 01.01.2009 to 01.03.2009 . time evaluation running only from 01.01.2009 to 31.01.2009 . its not moving to next month.
if i run time evaluation from 01.02.2009 to 01.03.2009 then its running only 01.02.2009 to 28.02.2009 its not moving to next month.
In the initialization in the next month im getting error message (no entry in table T001P for key)
Thnaks.
Manju

Similar Messages

  • Error ِِِِAfter Time Evaluation

    Dears ,
                     ِِAfter running of time evaluation , i faced this problem
                     i was testing new schedule rule but it failed
                     please advice me .

    Hi Waleed,
    Please define counting class for period work schedule.
    Please refer the below document for your reference.
    Public Holiday Calendar and Work Schedule Rules
    After creating the PWS, you must define counting class for Period Work Schedule in Table V_T551C. Please refer the below screenshot.
    Grpg             -        Personnel Subarea Grouping for Daily Work Schedules
    PWS             -        Name of Personnel Work Schedule. It can have maximum 4 characters.
    Start Date     -        Start date for counting class of PWS.
    End Date       -        End date for counting class of PWS.
    Cntg Class    -        Counting Class is used to count absence and attendance by specifying different methods of counting according to the period work schedule.
    I hope this resolves your issue.
    Thanks and regards,
    Vivek Barnwal

  • How to fix an error  (related to work schedule rule) in Time evaluation ?

    Hi experts,
    I am getting an error while running time evaluation - PT60.
    Find the log
    Log:TimeEvaluation                                                                                General data                                                                       
    Schema ZM04 Time Evaluation Without Clock Times
    00753402 Christoudas Natalie
    Customizing error in work schedule rule 1 VM 01 5MTWTF Person rejected: 00753402
    How to fix it? Its urgent.
    Be assured of points for useful answers.
    Rajesh

    Hi All,
    I have checked work schedules and work sc. rules. everything looks fine. Reason being fine, same work schrdule rule, i.e. 5MTWTF is used for other employees, whose payroll area, personnel area, personnel subarea, employee group and employee subgroups are same.
    Why it is throwing error for one employee 753402.
    I am providing you more information. In table V_T569r, if u select recalculation category as time evaluation, it is mentioned as 01.01.2003. Initially, one action called "Conversion take on" has been maintained as on 01.03.2002, where employee had payroll area -99 (payroll irrelevant) and personnel subarea - DAYY.
    Then on 17.03.2008, another action ran "Conversion initial reassignment" where payroll area changed to "MT - monthly", subarea changed to DAYF. At that time PDC recalculation date in infotype 0003 was 01.03.2002 which was before recalculation date, i.e. 01.01.2003.
    Time evaluation was throwing 2 error messages. one was solved by changing PDC recaluation date to 17.03.2008. But other error related to work sc rule 1 VM 01 5MTWTF still occurs. 
    Can some body now provide some useful information?
    Thanks
    Rajesh

  • Time evaluation error "Error while positioning ABWKONTI" for leave entitlem

    We are currently running on SAP ECC5. Time evaluation is run with schema TQTA everymonth to create leave quotas in info type 2006.
    I am experiencing a time evaluation error "Error while positioning ABWKONTI" for one employee when running TQTA.
    This employee was engaged on 14/08/2006. When I checked the logged changes per infotype, I found that a record for 14/07/2006 was deleted. I did check all the infotypes and all is reflecting the correct start date. I would really appreciate if someone can tell me how to fix this problem. Currently the leave entitlements are being processed manually. Please see below the error I am receiving:-
    Log: Time Evaluation
    4 General data
    Successful personnel numbers
    Personnel numbers with errors
    Personnel numbers ended early
    5 Personnel Numbers Rejected
    5 00408765 Van Wyk Werner
    U Error while positioning ABWKONTI
    13A200608 0002006081320060714###%##
    Quota could not be positioned:
    2006 08 2006.07.14 2006.08.13
    Relative day in period: 13 200706
    Quota used/quota entitlement to be accounted: 1.25000
    Person rejected: 00408765
    Messages
    5 Statistics
    Selected personnel numbers 1
    Successful runs for 0
    including with errors 0
    Processing not completed for 0
    Rejected 1
    Total number of messages and error messages 1

    Hi,
    Which Function Ur using for TQTR, Check That other wise P2006 Function Used.
    I think the error is in ur PCR.
    First u Understand the business process then write the PCR.
    Send ur pcr what u had written.
    also send ur Business senerio.like Conditions........

  • Time Evaluation Errors

    Hi All,
    Is there a standard way of correcting the Time Evaluation errors in a mass rather than going to induvidual master data and correcting it(Positive Time Management)...
    Thanks

    The normal time evaluation errors are-Clock in not found, clock out not found, repeated time events for the same day,etc. And changes requires in IT 2011 for affected employees.You can design an LSMW for deleting, uploading the tim events with a list of the affected employees.

  • Error when running time evaluation

    Hi,
    When I am running time evaluation I got this error "start of pair formation changed from 20040101 to 20081212"
    I am using TM01 schema. Please help me out with this error.
    Thank you
    Shravan

    Hi Shravan,
    Please check infotype 0007 if the work schedule has changed fron 01/01/2004.
    Also please check the generated workschedule used for that employee , if the config has changed and that work schedule has been re- generated with a different DWS.
    Thanks.

  • Rectifying Time evaluation errors

    Hi Gurus,
    Q.1 I want to know how the errors generated through Time evaluation are rectified.
    can we use PT40 and it wud be great if explain the process of rectifying errors.
    Q.2 We have rule where we have to mark a day as absent if an employee is late by 30 minutes? can some body guide me how to do this and which rule has to be writen how?
    Thanks in Advance!!
    Regards,
    Anil Kumar

    Hi Anil,
    May be I can try answering your first question:
    Regarding PT40 (Time evaluation), usually the User runs the program in the test run mode if the number of employeea are less. If the employees are more, then actual run is made directly but in batches of 500+
    Once you get the errors, the system will show the error with description for each employee record.
    The only way to correct it is to manually go into the employee record and make changes to the master data. There could be some errors where IT 0007 or IT 0041 is not maintained, we need to create these records from the start of the hire or the start of the financial year.
    Then the program is run again for those employee records, then the quotas get updated for those employees. Hope this suffices.
    Regards,
    Sridhar.

  • Time evaluation generate check out entry

    Dear Gurus,
    How can we generate Check out entries thru Time evaluation?
    The sales employees come to office in the morning, they punch in and leave for sales activity. They don't get overtime, but pay / absence quota deducted if they don't check in in the system.
    While running Time evaluation, I am getting error in TE03 (delimiting error). I hv tried creating second entry using TF00. Its not working. Has anybody any solution for this?
    Regards,
    Vijay

    Hi Gurus,
    I am rephrasing my requirements.  have 2 queries,
    1. Sales Employees make only Clock In entries. System should generate the clock out entry or should not throw any error message. System should consider total working time from daily work schedule.
       - TE30 function is generated the entry in TEVEN table based on planned end time, but we need to create the entry in IT2012 otherwise, while processing next days entry, it generates error.
       - Will TF00 create an entry in Time Events IT2051 ? IF yes, how can I tweak TF00 rule to generate Time out entry.
    2. General Staff working hours need to be calculated from Shift Start even if they come early. Max working time is 12 hours with 4hrs from start of end of Shift period
       - If shift start is 7AM, I have defining Start tolerance as 6AM to 7:05AM, but still the system is considering the Clock In time for hours worked. 
    I have to write this condition. How to write ?
       If Clock-in Time < Start Time
          Then   TIP->From = Start Time
    I believe it has to be put in TL10 after rounding the Check in & check outs.. so as to update table TIP,
    Please suggest,
    Regards,
    Vijay

  • Absence quota 31 cant be accrued by time evaluation

    Hi
    while i run tim evaluation i get error like absence quota 31 cant be accrued by time evaluation,i configured generation rules & also written rule to update quota 31.Any suggestions where i went wrong??how to correct this error??
    Thanks&best regds
    Shaila

    Hi
    Actually i had written sub schema for this..bcoz this URL is eligible for those employees who are Cash processing officer & also based on personnel area we have to check wheter particular employee is Cash processing officer or nt if yes then only update 1day URL  to 2006 IT, if the employee is working on Public holiday..for updating i had written this PCR..ZMN1 Public holiday indicator(timetype), 31 is my quota group.
    HRS=1
    varstprsnt
    N
    Y
    HRS=DZMN1
    ADDDBZMN1
    UPDTQ31

  • Absence Quota creation during Time evaluation - Orgnaisational Assg change

    Hello Experts,
    I have one emplyee for whom the Transfer action has been run - his personal subarea has been changed from 1633 to 1654
    obviously the ps grouping for time quota type changed form 35 to 40.
    so function QUOTA is creating different quota for this employee than what there exist right now for infotype 2006.
    so during time evaluation below error is comming.
        Error entry no. 83 Error when creating absence quota
        A complex application error has occurred
    Kindly let me know how to overcome this error.
    Thanks Jay

    The reason 'error no. 83' occurs in RPTIME00 is because function QUOTA
    is trying to generate a quota type which does not exist for the employee
    on a specific day. It must have existed some time before.  Normally,
    the function QUOTA displays an error message concerning the
    non-existing quota types. In this case, the 'error no. 83' can only
    occur in the following scenarios:
    1. If you deleted a quota type that was to be generated
    2. If an employee has an organizational reassignment to a personnel
       subarea or employee subgroup which have different groupings for quota
       types and for these groupings the 'old' quota type does not exist.
    Function QUOTA checks to determine if the quota types to be generated
    are valid.  If the quota type is not valid anymore (see reason 2) then
    you will get a warning message.
    "the problem in these situations was the following:
    RPTIME00 is trying to generate a quota for a validity interval
    (defined in table T559D) during which the employee belongs to two
    different groupings, due to the transfer.
    In your case the quota type should be generated with a validity interval
    that begins before the employee's organizational change.
    Unfortunately, for the time between the validity begin up to the
    transfer of the employee there is no entry in table T556A for this quota
    type.
    or check the config of this quota running Rptquota_check in se38
    Therefore, it is possible to solve the problem by defining a dummy
    quota type for the 'old' groupings of the employee (table T556A).

  • Attendance type in time evaluation

    Hi All,
    Need solutions for the below issues.
    1) Clock in and clock out information for an employee is stored in SAP in IT2011, if clock in or clock out information is missing for an employee it should trigger a mail to employee and his manager.
    2) Currently using one attendance type : On duty would be raised by employee when is on business trip. System should consider this as working.
    During time evaluation it should consider if any attendance type and clock in and clock out details for an employee. and generate the absence quotas.
    There is no integration with payroll.
    3) If the accumulated earned leaves cross 90 days, rest of the leaves to be encashed, is there any standard sap solution for this or need to write a PCR or custom development to be done.
    Please let me know ho to do.
    Regards
    Vish

    1. The TD20 PCR in time schema evaluates time pairs and errors out if times are missing. The errors are stored in the FEHLER table. Maybe you can write a custom program to read this table and send messages.
    2. The On duty will be entered in IT2002 I guess. The positive TE schema will read both IT2011 and IT2002 and so should not be a problem.
    3. You need to write a PCR to accomplish this. There are useful doc on this forum. This doc by Vivek is very helpful:
    http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-55755
    Regards
    Pramod

  • Cross Day work issue in Time Evaluation for positive recording.

    Dear Experts,
    We would like to know whether anyone else has faced the below described issue before or has any suggestions for the same.
    Issue Background: We are uploading time events from the clocking recording system into SAP using an interface program. The clocking events are loaded without indicator 'M' and based on whether they belong to current day then assignment is '=' and '<' for previous day assignment.
    Issue Description: Some operational staff have planned daily shifts from 00:00 - 08:30. Hence they can clock-in before 00:00 on the previous day and since there is no 'Next Day Indicator' in SAP, we split the time events so that if the clock-in is at 23:00 previous day then the time pairs are formed as
    23:00 - 24:00 Current Day with Day assignment '='
    00:00 - 08:30 Next Day with Day assignment '='
    When we run the time evaluation, the day assignment for Next day pair 00:00 - 08:30 is automatically changed to '<'. This makes the Next day without any events and the time evaluation throws error in the next day.
    Now instead of automatic upload, if we manually upload the same time events, the records are as follows:
    23:00 - 24:00 Current Day with Day Assignment '+' and Origin Indicator 'M'
    00:00 - 08:30 Next Day with Day Assignment '+' and Origin Indicator 'M'
    Now if we execute time evaluation, the behaviour is as per expected and the time evaluation doesn't change the day assignment for any records.
    Work Around Proposed: Keep atleast 1 sec difference between the time events say the above records can be uploaded as follows:
    23:00 - 23:59 Current Day with Day assignment '='
    00:00 - 08:30 Next Day with Day assignment '='
    But we would like to avoid this if possible.
    Summary: In brief we would like to know whether why time evaluation has different processing for Origin indicator 'M' and SPACE.
    Many thanks for your inputs in advance, thanks.
    Regards,
    Roshan.

    Hi,
    see thread
    Time evaluation -early clockin for shifts starting at midnight ?
    maybe of interest
    bg
    Edited by: bg on Sep 16, 2010 9:26 AM

  • Collect Overflow Type P - Patching? Time evaluation?

    Hi Experts!
    I have an issue and I need your help.
    The client is in the process of patching Development, QA and Production. They have patched the DEV and QA clients and have yet to complete production.
    Testing in QA of time evaluation forced retro’d back a couple of years causes the following error (Collect_Overflow_Type_P) :
    The ABAP’er came back with this:
    I have processed time evaluation (with the log) at specific points in time to try and establish why the SALDO/TES tables are keeling over but I am really struggling to get to the bottom of this.
    The issue is not present in production, I am concerned that if production is patched and this issue remains, there will be significant issues for payroll!
    Is it a patching issue?
    Is it relating to note 1879092
    What is SALDO_NEW and is it something to do with this?
    Any help would be greatly appreciated!
    Will

    Hi Inge,
    I have had the same issue as you in the past so thats where I started investigating. None of the time types come anywhere near the limits... Thanks for your reply, its a great suggestion!
    The ABAP'er is checking with the Basis Team  whether note 1942144 has been applied.
    Will

  • Query on Time Evaluation results

    Hi,
    When i run time evaluation for 2000 employess without the 'Display Log' option,
    i get the result as
    Successful runs for                         1500
    including with errors                           300
    Processing not completed for             100
    Rejected                                              100
    Where i would be able to see the 300 personnel number which has run 'including with errors',
    100 personnel numbers for whom 'processing not completed for' and
    100 personnel numbers which got 'rejected'.
    regards,
    Santhosh

    Hi Santosh,
    List out 500 employee numbers  with error. Check there IT0007, check there work schedules also, and then  execute time evaluation in Test mode. Check the log once again. If it is error free then only execute in final run. And then check the B2 Cluster in PT66. You can see the results in B2 Cluster when log is error free.
    Regards
    Sampada

  • Binding assignment is not available:Error in the evaluation of expression

    Hi All,
    I have created Workflow to send an Email using Requested Start date concept of a Task.This is for sending a E-mail to the customer when contract end date-60 Days.
    I have done all Bindings and I am getting The date and time from BOR which I am using to triger an Event.
    I am getting these type of Errors:
    Source (expression '&BUS2000137.TIME&') of binding assignment is not available
    Source (expression '&BUS2000137.DATE&') of binding assignment is not available
    Error in the evaluation of expression '<???>&BUS2000137.DATE&' for item '1'
    Unable to determine the value of component ''
    Error in the evaluation of expression '<???>&BUS2000137.TIME&' for item '1'
    Unable to determine the value of component ''
    Looking for Inputs.
    Regard's,
    Lokesh

    Hi Adrash/Rick,
    Object type  ZBS2000137
    Attributes
    ZBS2000137.Time    Time to send mail --> Is nothing but OBJECT-TIME = SY-UZEIT
    ZBS2000137.Date    60 days before contract end date  --> Is nothing but  OBJECT-DATE =  LS_APPOINTMENT-DATE_FROM - 60.
    Methods
    ZBS2000137.Method1       Sending Mail
    Events
    ZBS2000137.Released      Contract Line Item Released
    ie I want to excute the task with same DATE and TIME, the same I have mentioned in "
    Requested Strat Tab with Expression as below
    Refer.date/time EXP Expression
    Date &BUS2000137.DATE&     60 days before contract end date
    Time &BUS2000137.TIME&      Time to send mail
    Note: If I am testing the Workflow from T-code: SWUS it is working fine.
    Regard's,
    Lokesh.

Maybe you are looking for

  • I cannot "capture" the fullScreen display state

    Hi, When trying to get my head around another problem I have with altering content depending on whether the displayState is normal or fullScreen, I tried to set up a feedback/debug box that would send me messages about the displayState. I created a t

  • Pivot Table Grand Total

    Newbie Question: How do I add a Grand Total of my columns in a pivot table? Thanks- Charlie Epes Buffalo, NY

  • How to add scroll bar in child form ( vb6.0 )

    look at this picture link (i think you will understand the issue) http://tinypic.com/r/25k232u/8 These information(class1,class2 --) are loaded from database and this time the information is too much and it moves down to the appearing part of the win

  • What tables are updated?

    I have some software that came bundled with Oracle as the database. When I perform an action in the GUI of the software I need to know what tables in Oracle are getting updated. How can I query Oracle to find that information.? We are using Oracle 9i

  • Flash won't run, says its not loaded, when its embedded on samsung tablet and Windows 8.

    On samsung tablet 500T windows 8 flash is embedded.  It says when I try to run flash that it is not loaded.  I followed all of the help and made sure all of the settings are correct.  It still will not run.  The only error is that it is NOT LOADED to