Error in transport system after cluster reboot

Hi All,
after a cluster reboot (Windows Server 2003, SAP R/3 Enterprise 4.7 X2, SQL-Server 2005) we got the following errors:
TMS Configuration is not consistent.
Going on the transport host (domain controller) of the system and checking the roll out of the configuration to all systems we got the next error: Transport Control Program has to be configured.
So we opened the Transport Host System in STMS, went to tp transport tool and test the transport tool. The shown error is: Profile Version xx is invalid. The step suggested by the system-help is to roll out the TMS configuration again but this step didn't work because of the above error.
Is there any solution or have we to delete the configuration and start from scretch?
Thanks in advance
Stefan

Hi
Don't delete the current TMS straight away.
Check all the RFC's b/w your systems in landscape. Check whether those RFC's are working fine or not.
If it's a H/w Cluster check host entries are maintiained properly. Do all the three check in stms.
Hope it should solve the problem.
Regards
Deepanshu Sharma

Similar Messages

Since upgrading to ios 8.0.2, airprint will give error (no printer found" After a reboot, it locates and prints, then next time same error code. Any ideas?

Since upgrading to ios 8.0.2, airprint will give error (no printer found" After a reboot, it locates and prints, then next time same error code. Any ideas?

Hi bdtcop,
I understand that you are experiencing an issue with AirPrint. Here is an article for you with some troubleshooting steps that may be helpful for resolving this issue:
About AirPrint
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4356
If you're unable to print
Check these things if you are unable to print, or if you see the message "No AirPrint Printers Found."
Make sure your printer has paper, and enough ink or toner installed.
Make sure your printer is connected to the same Wi-Fi network as your iOS device.
Make sure your printer has power and is turned on. Try turning your printer off and then back on again to see if it resolves your issue.
Check to see if your printer has any error lights or indicators displayed on the printer's control panel. Check the documentation that came with your printer to clear any errors displayed.
Check with your printer's manufacturer to see if any firmware updates are available for your printer. Check your printer's documentation or contact the printer vendor for more information. A firmware update may be available, even if you just bought your printer.
Thanks for using the Apple Support Communities. Have a good one!
-Braden

T61: "Error loading operating system" after reboot with Windows XP SR3

So here is my problem: Occasionally, after reboot I get "Error loading operating system" right after the Lenovo screen (the one where you can press ThinkVantage button). After that the only thing I can do is shut down the computer and fix the windows boot (see bellow…). I'm running Windows XP SR3, clean install.
I've had my T61 for 6 months now and I've had this problem about 8 times so far. Obviously this makes my T61 unstable and is becoming a major problem (I like to shut down the computer before taking it anywhere, and I don't really use Hibernate).
Solving the boot is very easy and takes 3 minutes… But the Win XP CD is needed for the fix and I don't want to carry it around with me everywhere. And anyway this is annoying and makes my T61 crippled…
To fix the problem:
1 Change AHCI -> Compatibility in BIOS.
2 Boot using the Windows XP CD.
3 Enter the Recovery Console (press R).
4 Use "fixboot" to write a new boot sector.
5 Restart ("exit").
6 Change back to AHCI in Bios.
After that the computer works perfect until the next time… Things I have tried so far:
1 Installed latest Bios for T61.
2 Checked firmware for HD (WD Scorpio WD1600BEVS) and it's the latest.
3 Installed all windows updates for Windows XP.
4 Installed all latest drivers for T61 (specifically checked the Intel Matrix Storage Driver and it's the latest).
5 Checked computer for Viruses, malware, etc. with a few scanners. It's clean.
6 Updated some of the programs that I thought might be causing problems: Avira , PerfectDisk 2008, TrueImage Home…
7 Checked HD with WD Diagnostics tools
I am out of ideas. Something is corrupting the boot sector occasionally when I shut down the system. But I can't find why or under what circumstances it happens… The only thing I didn't try was a completely new clean system install, a thing which I REALLY don't want to do. Except for this problem the system is great, very stable and I'm very happy with it.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance.

I run the windows version of TestDisk. Is there any specific reason for me to make a Live CD? It seems to work just fine in windows. Anyway, I run all the analysis tests with it. It did NOT find any problems. Is there some specific test I should run?
Some further testing has shown me that the problem happens sometime during using windows and not upon restarting... When it does happen I can no longer use chkdsk - it gives the following error message:
"The type of the filesystem is RAW.
CHKDSK is not available for RAW drives."
Some other things I tried:
- I've pretty much ruled out physical HD problems (I checked the HD with PC Doctor, WD's Data Lifeguard Diagnostic Tool and chkdsk - no problems). And the HD shows no symptoms of failure (no noises or any other problems).
- Ruled out boot-sector Viruses (cheked the computer with 4 different antiviruses - Avira,AVG, Kaspersky and NOD32).
- Manually checked the boot.ini file - no problems.
- I have also found while googling that the problem might have to do with a registry entry concerning HDs bigger then 137gb. I double checked that entry and it's fine.
- Tried both fixmbr and fixboot, alone and together - windows boots, but the problem comes back again after a few hours/days...
Things I'm trying now:
- Reinstalled the Intel Matrix Storage Drivers (before I just checked that they are the latest).
- Disabled the Active Protection System (I am shooting in the dark...).
I am getting pretty desperate here.

Error with Transport system not configured that may be related to CHaRM

Who has in depth knowledge on setting up SAP Solution Manager CHaRM. Had an odd problem with the transport system failing when the QA system was shut down for maintenance. Transports were not able to be created or save to. Error message was Transport System not configured. Brought up QA and re-distributed system and Transport group and transport requests started working again.

Hello,
if a system, e.g. QA system, will not be available due to a maintenance task,
we set the status of this system to "temporarily inactive" (see header data in transaction SMSY).
This status allows us, to create new transport requests in DEV-System although consolidation system QA is not available.
(Of course you have to reset the status, when QA-system ist started again.)
Hint: it is not possible to release or to import a transport request, when consolidation system is shut down.
Therefore the developer should pay attention to the messages, which raise in urgent corrections.
best regards
Horst

Error loading operating system after installation of Linux AS4

Hi,
I have Hardware HP DL580 G3 server attached with SAN.
I just installed Linux AS4, installation went fine and successufly installed, upon rebooting of server it is giving following error.
attempting from Hard Drive (C:)
Error Loading Operating system
Please help me out

First: did you install the bootloader in the MBR (it's a question during the installation), so the server is able to boot linux automatically?
"C:" is a typical MSDOS naming (and windows naming), which probably means the dos/windows bootloader is still in the MBR (master boot record)
If not, reinstall linux and install grub (preferably) in the MBR

Error loading operating system after factory reset CQ61 windows 7

Its a Compaq CQ61-306SA running windows 7. I did a factory reset and after a while got a black screen with ERROR LOADING OPERATING SYSTEM.It never came with any discs or copy of windows so is there any way of fixing this problem. Please help am getting ready to throw it at the wall.Thankyou

Did you burn an OS Recovery DVD set using the software on your machine? If so boot from the first one and follow the prompts.
If you didn't burn your set ,they can be ordered for a small fee>> Contact HP
******Clicking the Thumbs-Up button is a way to say -Thanks!.******
**Click Accept as Solution on a Reply that solves your issue to help others**

[WARNING] fglrx invalid map error killed my system after 3 weeks

Hi! I had to re-install my entire archinstall 64bit after 3 weeks of usage. I noticed when my system froze during a reboot the /var/log it self were going over 9GB!!!!!!!!!!! And that was because the kernel generated tons of errors concering catalyst 9.4-9.5.
I couldn't check the xorg log since my system died trying to start X (kde4), but it was blank. 9GB that's insane if you ask me, and all the errorrs were related to catalyst "fglrx fireq invalid map handle".
I tried running cat/nano on the error logs but that also generated in a massive hardware freeze (fans spins down) no wonder since the logs were filled with tons of errors.
Is there a way to tell the kernel or w/e to shut the hell up? No seriously, I don't want to re-install my laptop in less then a month.
I know amd/ati doesnt support the 2.29-30 kernel yet but is there a way to silence the errors?
Last edited by greenfish (2009-05-24 19:41:34)

Hi! I had to re-install my entire archinstall 64bit after 3 weeks of usage. I noticed when my system froze during a reboot the /var/log it self were going over 9GB!!!!!!!!!!! And that was because the kernel generated tons of errors concering catalyst 9.4-9.5.
I couldn't check the xorg log since my system died trying to start X (kde4), but it was blank. 9GB that's insane if you ask me, and all the errorrs were related to catalyst "fglrx fireq invalid map handle".
I tried running cat/nano on the error logs but that also generated in a massive hardware freeze (fans spins down) no wonder since the logs were filled with tons of errors.
Is there a way to tell the kernel or w/e to shut the hell up? No seriously, I don't want to re-install my laptop in less then a month.
I know amd/ati doesnt support the 2.29-30 kernel yet but is there a way to silence the errors?
Last edited by greenfish (2009-05-24 19:41:34)

"disk read error" and "error loading operating system"

Hello,
I have a problem with my N100 0768 BSG with Windows XP system. When I turned it on there was a lenovo screen with a sign: "to interrupt normal startup press lenovo care button" as usual. But after that instead of Windows loading there was a sign: "disk read error". I rebooted it, run rescue and recovery and started recovery proces.
However after about 20 minutes of recovery process, I saw a blue screen with some error and I could only shut down the computer. When I turned it on again, there was lenovo screen and after that I saw: "error loading operating system". I rebooted it but now I can't even run "rescue and recovery".
I downloaded some diagnostic programme from lenovo site, burned it on dvd and run on my lenovo. When it was doing "Surface scan test" of my hard drive, there was an error: "Error : Found uncorrectable data error."
I thought about buying rescue and recovery cd from lenovo but I heard that they do not sell it in Poland.
Please help me.
Sorry for my English.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

If you have a dual core processor and 2 GB of RAM you will have no problems running Windows 7. You can check the microsoft hardware compatibility site to find out for sure.
Why 32 bit over 64 bit?
Unless you are doing an application like Video rendering or using a Digital Audio Workstation you probably won't notice any performance difference. Most applications today aren't written to take advantage of a 64 bit OS. This will happen over time but for now - you just don't need it. The 32 bit OS will be more compatible with older peripherals like printers and other devices where the manufacturer may not have built a 64 bit driver. Also when you get the upgrade disk you will get both versions so you can start with the 32 bit and always upgrade to the 64 bit at a later time if you really need it. You can only address a little more than 3 GB of RAM in a 32 bit OS but that is usually overkill for most applications people use. A 64 bit OS will allow you to address more memory but you will not gain any performance increases unless the specific application you run is written as a 64 bit application.
I have also found certain older applications that don't work with the 64 bit OS. So it really depends on what peripherals you are using and what applications you tend to use. The safe bet is to go with the 32 bit version.
If you decide to use XP just burn a copy of the XP disk and then you will have one the next time you need to reload. The licensing has nothing to do with the media - it is all about the license you own. Your license key should be on the bottom of your laptop.
Hope this helps.

G555 (0873) error loading operating system with fresh install of XP

Hello,
I am in need of assistance. i had XP Pro installed and functioning on my Lenovo G555 0873, but due to a bad virus i received in email I needed to reload XP because it corrupted everything. Just use it for some games so wasn't worried about data. But now I get an error loading operating system after fresh install of XP Pro, Computer formats drive copyies files and restarts like itis supposed then Operating system is lost? Can you help me?
Xtiansdomain

hey Xtiansdomain,
i do hope that you created recovery media via One Key Recovery. If you did, use that to recover your system.
however if no recovery media was made, get in contact with the support crew via : http://bit.ly/LNVsuppNum
WW Social Media
Important Note: If you need help, post your question in the forum, and include your system type, model number and OS. Do not post your serial number.
Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"!
Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!
Have you checked out the Community Knowledgebase yet?!
How to send a private message? --> Check out this article.

WDS unattend.xml shutdown the system after installing the image instead of reboot.

I have a large number of machines that I want to install Windows 7 by using WDS unattend.xml.
unattend.xml works absolutely fine but I want WINPE to shutdown the system at the end of image installation and before OOBE.
Could you please let me know, how can I automate this process, so Winpe shutdown instead of rebooting after image deployment and before oobe.
Do I have to put this command x:\windows\system32\wpeutil.exe shutdown somewhere in unattend.xml or elsewhere else.
I would appreciate if you could please answer this question.
Here my unattend.xml it works fine, but reboots the system instead of shutdown.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<unattend xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:unattend">
<settings pass="windowsPE">
<component name="Microsoft-Windows-International-Core-WinPE" processorArchitecture="x64" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" language="neutral" versionScope="nonSxS" xmlns:wcm="http://schemas.microsoft.com/WMIConfig/2002/State" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<SetupUILanguage>
<UILanguage>en-US</UILanguage>
</SetupUILanguage>
<InputLocale>0809:00000809</InputLocale>
<SystemLocale>en-GB</SystemLocale>
<UserLocale>en-GB</UserLocale>
</component>
<component name="Microsoft-Windows-Setup" processorArchitecture="x64" publicKeyToken="31bf3856ad364e35" language="neutral" versionScope="nonSxS" xmlns:wcm="http://schemas.microsoft.com/WMIConfig/2002/State" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<DiskConfiguration>
<Disk wcm:action="add">
<CreatePartitions>
<CreatePartition wcm:action="add">
<Order>1</Order>
<Type>Primary</Type>
<Extend>true</Extend>
</CreatePartition>
</CreatePartitions>
<ModifyPartitions>
<ModifyPartition wcm:action="add">
<Order>1</Order>
<Active>true</Active>
<Extend>false</Extend>
<Format>NTFS</Format>
<Label>Windows</Label>
<Letter>C</Letter>
<PartitionID>1</PartitionID>
</ModifyPartition>
</ModifyPartitions>
<DiskID>0</DiskID>
<WillWipeDisk>true</WillWipeDisk>
</Disk>
</DiskConfiguration>
<WindowsDeploymentServices>
<ImageSelection>
<InstallTo>
<DiskID>0</DiskID>
<PartitionID>1</PartitionID>
</InstallTo>
<InstallImage>
<ImageGroup>xxxxxxxxxxx</ImageGroup>
<ImageName>xxxxxxxxxxxx</ImageName>
<Filename>xxxxxxxxxxxxx</Filename>
</InstallImage>
</ImageSelection>
<Login>
<Credentials>
<Domain>xxxxxxx</Domain>
<Password>xxxxxxx</Password>
<Username>xxxxxx</Username>
</Credentials>
</Login>
</WindowsDeploymentServices>
<restart>Shutdown</restart>
</component>
</settings>
<cpi:offlineImage cpi:source="xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" xmlns:cpi="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:cpi" />
</unattend>
I have also tried to use the command line like this, see below.
</WindowsDeploymentServices>
<CommandLine>
x:\windows\system32\wpeutil.exe shutdown
</CommandLine>
WinPE does not even start with above mentioend wpeutil.exe shutdown command, it throws an error and reboots.
I would really appreciate if someone can help me figure it out, how can I auto shutdown the system instead of reboot after WDS / WINPE installs the image.
Thanks in advance

1. When the error message appears, open up a command window with SHIFT + F11
2. open the REGEDIT
3. navigate to hklm\system\setup
4. change CmdLine to blank (no value entered) (was oobe\windeploy.exe)
5. change CreateNewQueueOnFirstBoot to 0 (was 1)
6. change OOBEInProgress to 0 (was 1) (i am guessing that might be AUDITInProgress
if that was your sysprep choice)
7. change SetupPhase to 0 (was 4)
8. change SetupShutdownRequired to 0 (was 1)
9. change SetupType to 0 (was 2)
10. change SystemSetupInProgress to 0 (was1)
11. exit REGEDIT and reboot

Transport system: errors on import

Hi,
we have a report program with 35 includes as our developing guideline require an own include for each FORM routine.
I made a couple of changes including the creation of new FORMs with new includes. Transport from develeopment to test without problems. After optimization I had finally 3 transports in Test system.
They were imported with STMS together into production. This caused a generation error in one of the transports because an include was reported missing that was in one of the other transports.
It was OK just to re-generate the program in productive system, now everything is fine. But additionally I had to update the navigation index and refresh the object tree in SE80 to see all objects.
But a bitter taste remains: I expected the transport system to be aware of all objects in all transports imported together.
Can you explain this behaviour and give any hints to vaoid this in the future.
TIA and regards,
Clemens Li

Thank you Hans,
so this means that transporting together and transporting in sequence is just the same?
Meanwhile I saw that already my first transport to test system had the error reporting a missing form routine although the routine was included in one of the transported includes.
Possibly a weakness in the system: The new Form has a similar name to an old existing form. The old name is 25 chars long, the new forms name is 29 chars long; old name + 4 chars suffix.
This may have confused the system.
Regards,
Clemens

Error while transporting database index into quality system

Hello,
I am getting an error while transporting a new index in quality system.
I have created a new index for table VBFA in TRD and activity the object without errors. I even adjusted the database table using database utility.
While transporting the request there was a strange error "R3TRTABLVBFA was repaired in this system".
I retransported the objects using a new request. However I still got the same error.
Please help.

Navin,
No idea about the error you have mentioned but check the SAP Notes 185530 and see if you can avoid creating an index.In this Notes it is clearly mentioned on how to use VBFA table without any performance issues.
K.Kiran.

Source System Error While transporting

Hi SDN,
We are transporting requests to a deployment test box SN1 and we are getting this error message while we never got this error message transporting to QAS and in QAS we did not need to create DEV010 as a source system - setting up RFC connection was sufficient.
Any thoughts?
===========================================================
Source system DEV010 does not exist
Message no. RSAR409
Diagnosis
Source system DEV010 is not known.
System response
The imported data for data source 8ZM_C42 was deleted again as the referenced source system does not exist and no mapping is defined in table RSLOGSYSMAP to an available productive source system.
Procedure
Create the referenced source system in the Administrator Workbench or define a mapping to a known source system in table RSLOGSYSMAP.
You get to the maintenance using Tools -> Conversion of the logical system names.

Speak to your basis team and ask them to make entries in table:
RSLOGSYSMAP .
Are you trying to transport info source or any source system dependt object? If so, this error is understandable.
This has been discussed several times and pl search the forum.
Ravi Thothadri

Error checking transport group configuration in System BQS

Hi Everyone,
I made a client export from Production to Quality. It went successfully,, I noted the requests numbers and transported them from PRD to Quality, but while transporting there was a tp error(which i did not note), next i went to the quality import queue and saw all the 3 requests had come. But when i click the adjust queue icon im getting the following error message "Error checking transport group configuration in System BQS" . Afterwards i tried to delete the requests from quality to retransport from production but still im not able to delete those requests from quality. Can anyone help me solve this.
Regards,
Rahul

Hello Rahul,
regarding the error message:
"Error checking transport group configuration in system"
It's mostly related to the TMSADM RFC destination. Kindly follow the below mention steps:
1. Logon to client 000 with user DDIC.
2. STMS > System > Overview > Select the system in which you are logged in > Click on the menu says EXTRAS > Generate RFC Destinations
Perform the above steps in all the systems configure in your TMS. This should resolve the issue.
Best regards,
Tomas Black

Error while source system creation/Source system transport

Hi,
     In our BW implementation, the system landscape is only 2 servers. One is BW Dev, another is BW Prd. All configurations are done in BW Dev and I extracted the data from QAS for this BW Dev system.
     Since we cant create the source systems in the BW Production system, I tried to create the source system for the SAP R3 Production system in BW Dev and trying to transport this to BW Production Instance.
     I have two queries.
1. Is this way is correct for creating the Source System for BW Production system?
2. When I tried to activate the source system I am getting the following error messages. (I tested the RFC Destinations. There is no problem, I also done the configurations for logical system creation and client assignment in both the systems).
Error in source system GWPCLNT900
     Message no. RSAR502
Diagnosis
     With Remote Function Call to system GWPCLNT900 error connection closed
     (no data) ccurred.
Procedure
     Remove the cause of the error.
When tried again I got the following error message
Basic type ZSBB030 doesnt exist. EA 447
Result of the destination check: Timeout RSAR 375.
Could anyone throw some light on these errors?
Thanks in advance.
Krishna

Hi,
you need to maintain the logical systems on both R/3 and BW. You also need to set up the RFC connection with users that can log in to the other system. The R/3 system must be open for customizing in scc4.
In transaction se03 the system change options for 'Business Information Warehouse: SAP Namespace' and 'Business Information Warehouse: Customer Namespace' may need to be modifiable. I am not completely sure about this.
The last thing I will mention is that I have seen source system creation fail when the RFC-users are system users, and the source system creation worked if the RFC-users was display user while creating the source system. The RFC-users must be changed back to system user later...
Please look at best practice documents on a more step-by-step guide...
Best regards,
Christian Frier

Error in transport system after cluster reboot

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for