Error Only one EhP release is allowed additionally

Short Text    
Error Only one EhP release is allowed additionally:    
Long Text    
Hi experts,
I have installed EHP3 using transaction saint. Now when I try to upgradeto EHP4 , I am getting following error in MOPZ.
Error Only one EhP release is allowed additionally:
Information Make sure you have implememented note 1287216
Information Select at least one of the technical usages additionally:
Information *HCM - Learning Solution*
Information *Learning Solution - ABAP only*
But when I go back on previous screen
learning solution is greyed out and red,
HCM learning solution is also greyed out (not Red).
Even if I choose EHP3, still both these components are greyed out.
I have looked at note 1287216 and 1139602 but can't find what is missing.
please advise how can I make these 2 components selectable .
thanks,
Daljit boparai

Hi,
To apply these components have you generated xml file ? If yes, then is xml file contains these patches ?
Please check and revert back...
Thanks
Sunny

Similar Messages

  • Only one EhP release is allowed aditionally:

    Hello Gurus,
    at mopz for our prod. system ERP 6.0 EHP3 we get always the error message
    Error Only one EhP release is allowed additionally:
    Information Make sure you have implememented note 1287216
    Information Select at least one of the technical usages additionally:
    Information **HCM - Learning Solution**
    Information **Learning Solution - ABAP only**
    if we want to do a stack collection for EHP4.
    Additionally we can not select the RED technical usage *Learning Solution - ABAP only* and the GREY technical usage *HCM - Learning Solution* .
    The checkboxes are greyed out.
    There are some solution?
    regards
    Ch. Fischer

    Hi
    If you will go in SMSY transaction then slect your sysrem and on right side you will get the screen where all usage types are defined for your system..
    there you need to select learning solution and HCM one and then you will be able to select it in MOPZ..
    Thanks
    Sunny

  • Only one Extractor source is allowed in a data flow ?

    Hi,
    We have a common scenario (I think this is common for SAP ECC in general) where we have 2 tables, *_ATTR (Attributes) and *_TEXT (descriptions).  We extract these using extractors.
    Initially when we tried to place 2 in a dataflow, we got an error saying 'Only one Extractor source is allowed in a data flow'.
    To work around this, we created 2 embedded dataflows and everything seems to work fine.  But when I do a validate all, I get the error:
    [Data Flow:DF_ODS_MD_WBS_ELEMENT]  Only one Extractor source is allowed in a data flow. (BODI-1116145)
    Should I be worried ?  My gut feeling is this is a bug in the validate all function, but I could be wrong.  Everything seems to run fine, so is it safe to ignore this ?
    This currently effects about 5 dataflows, but we have about 40 more to implement like this, so I don't want to get it wrong.
    Thanks,
    Leigh.

    Like it says, that is invalid xml. It looks like it is a bug
    in the example doc.
    Add a root node to the xml and you should be ok.
    Tracy

  • I have to print two labels using single XML file.Error:Only one top level e

    Hi,
    I have to print two labels using single XML file. But its giving error:
    [Error] Error -1072896683 - Line: 38 Pos: 2 Error: Only one top level element is allowed in an XML document.
    Below is my XMl file:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
    <!DOCTYPE labels SYSTEM "label.dtd">
    <labels FORMAT="lib://FRD/PurchasedDoor.btw"  PRINTERNAME="IBM 6700-R80 (300 dpi)" _QUANTITY="1">
    <label>
    <variable name= "Color">AUTUMN</variable>
    <variable name= "Special_Message_Attribute">MSG*</variable>
    <variable name= "Special_Message">This is special Message Label</variable>
    <variable name= "Model"></variable>
    <variable name= "Build_Date">09-APR-12</variable>
    <variable name= "Assy_Cart"></variable>
    <variable name= "Assy_Slot"></variable>
    <variable name= "Finish_Cart"></variable>
    <variable name= "Finish_Slot"></variable>
    <variable name= "Serial_Number">1945.1.1.2-1</variable>
    <variable name= "Serial_Number_Barcode">1945.1.1.2-1</variable>
    <variable name= "Specie">BIRCH</variable>
    <variable name= "Truck_Group"></variable>
    <variable name= "Label_Sequence_No">1</variable>
    <variable name= "WIP_Cart"></variable>
    <variable name= "WIP_Slot"></variable>
    <variable name= "Cabinet_Sequence_No">110</variable>
    <variable name= "JC"></variable>
    <variable name= "Thickness"> </variable>
    <variable name= "Width"> </variable>
    <variable name= "Length"> </variable>
    <variable name= "Overlay"></variable>
    <variable name= "Options">B30</variable>
    <variable name= "Profile_No"></variable>
    <variable name= "Door_Style">NEWBERRY</variable>
    <variable name= "Glaze"></variable>
    <variable name= "Shape"></variable>
    <variable name= "Glass"></variable>
    <variable name= "Hinge_Side"></variable>
    <variable name= "Hinge_Type"></variable>
    <variable name= "EGE"></variable>
    </label>
    <labels FORMAT="lib://FRD/SpecialMessage.btw"  PRINTERNAME="IBM 6700-R80 (300 dpi)" _QUANTITY="1">
    <label>
    <variable name= "Serial_Number">1945.1.1.2-1</variable>
    <variable name= "Special_Message">This is special Message Label</variable>
    <variable name= "Cabinet_Sequence_No">110</variable>
    </label>
    </labels>
    Please suggest.

    >
    XML can only have one root element per file.
    >
    from XML Document: The Root Element

  • Getting Error :- Only one instance of COBRAS Export can be running at a time

    Hi All,
    I was checking the Briefcase Mode help file and it mentions for Unity Conection
    that COBRAS will run multiple instances of itself – if you schedule multiple backups to fire up at the same time they will all run at the same time.
    However if I schedule multiple backups to fire at the same time then I get the error :- "Only one instance of COBRAS Export can be running at a time".
    This also happens if the COBRAS windows is left open and the scheduled backup starts in the background.
    http://www.ciscounitytools.com/Applications/General/COBRAS/Help/COBRAS_Briefcase/COBRAS_Briefcase.htm#_Toc276653845
    I am not sure if I am making a mistake in understanding the statement :- "COBRAS will run multiple instances of itself – if you schedule multiple backups to fire up at the same time" or do we need to add any switch like lot of other application need like /m etc in the field of the scheduled backups as I see as /silent switch for process to run in background automatically but none for multiple instances.
    I am attaching the screen shots of the errors I got when
    A.) I scheduled 2 backups to run at the same time and the COBRAS application window was open "COBRASExportCUC7.exe" was running  and no backup took place and got errors for both the scheduled backups.
    And
    B.) I scheduled 2 backups to run at the same time and the COBRAS application window was closed off and "COBRASExportCUC7.exe" was not running and one of the scheduled backups started to work and the other one gave error and didn't work
    Unity Connection in use :- Version 8.0.3.20000-18
    Cobras Export :- Version 1.0 Build 76
    Please Suggest.
    Regards,
    Prad
    (E-Mail :- [email protected])

    Yeah, I’m of two minds on that – on the one hand it’s bad style to have a scheduled application popping dialog boxes (especially if you’re running as an account you don’t log in as regularly) – one the other hand I did have some sites go a while not noticing backups were failing (due to a UNC not flying any longer after a server reconfig) – folks can be bad about checking log files or the event log for issues.  A pop up would pretty much guarantee they’d notice on next login at any rate.
    I think I may stitch in email notifications in COBRAS Export in the same way they’re in the User Data Dump so failures of scheduled backups would be noticed right away (big, bright email in your box saying “failed!” would do it). 
    Either way, I’ll update the help and make sure it fails quietly for now when I update some other items on the site middle of next week.
    Thanks for the report.

  • Only one root tag is allowed.

    I'm trying to run the following (from Flex 2.0 Online help) :
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <mx:Application xmlns:mx="
    http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml">
    <mx:XML id="capitals" format="e4x">
    <Capitals label="U.S. State Capitals">
    <capital label="AL" value="Montgomery" />
    <capital label="AK" value="Juneau"/>
    <capital label="AR" value="Little Rock"/>
    <capital label="AZ" value="Phoenix"/>
    </Capitals>
    <Capitals label="Canadian Province Capitals">
    <capital label="AB" value="Edmonton" />
    <capital label="BC" value="Victoria"/>
    <capital label="MB" value="Winnipeg"/>
    <capital label="NB" value="Fredericton"/>
    </Capitals>
    </mx:XML>
    <!-- Create an XMLListCollection representing the Tree
    nodes.
    capitals.Capitals is an XMLList with both Capitals elements.
    -->
    <mx:XMLListCollection id="capitalColl"
    source="{capitals.Capitals}" />
    <!-- When you use an XML-based data provider with a tree
    you must specify
    the label field, even if it is "label".
    The XML object includes the root, so you must set
    showRoot="false".
    Remember that the Tree will not, by default, reflect dynamic
    changes
    to the XML object. -->
    <mx:Tree id="Tree1" dataProvider="{capitals}"
    labelField="@label"
    showRoot="false" width="300" />
    <!-- The XMLListCollection does not include the XML root.
    -->
    <mx:Tree id="Tree2" dataProvider="{capitalColl}"
    labelField="@label"
    width="300" />
    </mx:Application>
    and I get
    Only one root tag is allowed.
    Any idea what has to change?
    Thanks

    Like it says, that is invalid xml. It looks like it is a bug
    in the example doc.
    Add a root node to the xml and you should be ok.
    Tracy

  • How to resolve error 'The DPMRA service terminated with service-specific error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted'

    One of my exchange 2010 servers dpm agent is give the following error when the dpmra service attempts to start.
    The DPMRA service terminated with service-specific error Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted..
    I have tried uninstalling/reinstalling the agent but this does not resolve the issue
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    William Hickson

    Hi
    Something has probably changed on the protected server side that affects the DPM agent. In some cases the DCOM configuration could change. Look at this blogpost and verify your DPMRA DCOM object.
    http://robertanddpm.blogspot.com/2010/08/dpm-ra-rights.html
    If this doesn't do the trick try reinstall the agent.
    Best Regards
    Robert Hedblom
    MVP DPM
    Check out my DPM blog @ http://robertanddpm.blogspot.com

  • "Only one EHP Level in the system"?

    I am reading a blog called "SAP enhancement packages for SAP ERP".
    At page 22, it says:
    "An Application system can only consist of one EHP level (e.g. EHP3 or EHP4). Hence installed
    EHP components have to be updated with every future EHP implementation."
    I do not quite understand above statement.
    1) how can a system have 2 EHP levels?
    2) If our PROD system is too busy to have the downtime to be updated with the future EHP, what will happen?
    Please share your opinion. Thanks!

    As of EHP3, you could still install some EHP components. On an ERP 6.00, you could just push SAP_APP to 6.03 and move on. Now if you want another component in your system with an EHP4 version, you can't have some components at EHP3 and some at EHP4. You would install EHP4 for the new component you desire updated and part of the work will be to also update SAP_APP to 6.04.
    EHP4 is an UPGRADE process, with shadow instance & all the joy of an upgrade process. You can either run ressource minimized or downtime minimized. In resource minimized, the shadow instance runs on the same server as the main instance. Downtime minimized allow to run the shadow instance on a separate / new server. Anyway you go, you will always have a "Downtime Phase" when you bring back the updated components from the shadow instance toward the real production one.
    As with any UPGRADE project, the benefits of installing EHP4 for your business has to weighted against the downtime cost.
    Our tests so far on small systems (few data, few users, 120GB database) show ~3 days process from EHP3 to EHP4 (all components) with a downtime phase of about 22 hours using the "resource minimized" path, i.e. shadow & main instance on the same server (4 CPUs, 16GB RAM). Until you give a try at your Sandbox or DEV systems, you won't have realistic figures for your environment.
    Good luck!

  • Only one Currency should be allowed..........

    Dear Experts,
    How can we make only single currency to be allowed to enter in the sales documents - sales orde / invoice ???
    Eg. If we want to create order only in INR and should not be created for any other currency  than INR, how we can achieve this??? Is it possible to make iin SAP standard?? Or do we have to go for any programming ??
    Thanks in advance
    Sagar

    Dont think, anything is available to achieve this in SAP standard. You can make the document currency field on the sales document non editable by doing code changes in USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION  in program MV45AFZZ . Thanks

  • Can't Find Server at... error -- only one site, works from non-Macs fine

    Greetings:
    I have been getting a "Can't Find Server at www.teocommunications.com" error in Firefox for over a month now. I thought initially that it was a problem with the DNS entries and maybe the record had not proliferated though the DNS servers of my ISP or something of that nature. This is not the case.
    I have tried to bring my site up in Safari and it yields the same result.
    Did an nslookup, and everything resolves fine. Every once in awhile the site comes up on my Mac, but most of the time it gives the error. At all times, if you try to go to it from a Windows machine or my smart phone it works fine 100% if the time. My wife's Windows Vista machine with Firefox brings it up fine 100% of the time (she is on the very same network). I can get it to work for some reason if I totally reboot the Mac or reset the router (but the router is obviously not the problem)... it has to be something in the Mac OS (10.6 and 10.5) that is going on. I have eliminated all other possible problems. Curiously enough, it seems to also be a Leopard (not just Snow Leopard) issue... I can reproduce the error at my school (which is on a totally different network than my home) on the Mac Pro Intels they have which are still on Leopard.
    I am on the latest version of Snow Leopard on a brand new Mac Mini.
    This problem is only with my site (that I know of) but again it happens ONLY on Macs with Leopard or Snow Leopard. I am very annoyed by this problem and because it is my professional work site, it is imperative that I find the solution and soon.
    Hope someone can help.
    APPLE, please look into possible configuration or DNS issues in Leopard/Snow Leopard, as before I posted here, I did try several 'fixes' for issues like this for Firefox before I noticed that Safari was getting the same issue and ANY OTHER PLATFORM sees my page just fine!

    Hi Guys:
    It sometimes works from my Mac as well. I can get it to load if I reboot the Mac and then in a few reloads it is back to the same error.
    I did try openDNS as well and it did not still load. I can pretty much guarantee that it is not the DNS records, it is something going on between my Mac (or the Pros at school). Other sites from my same host work fine, my domain is setup exactly the same. They do use ISPConfig... and it could be something with that program, but I can not seem to confirm any problems there.
    I reset my router and the site is currently loading again on my Mac, but I can tell you it will be throwing the error in the very near future because that is one fix that worked before and it worked exactly two loads when I switched to a different wireless access point that is not my router.
    SO, the fact that it loads one to up to twenty times on someone's Mac is not enough to reproduce the problem. It takes several reloads and then the problem magically re-appears. This is why the fact that it is working right now on my machine is not good enough to call it fixed.
    Try to reload my site several times and see if it gives you the error.
    I have (as I stated) tried a lot of what is being suggested here and re-tried it, but nothing fixes it for very long
    I appreciate the help and hopefully we can figure out why the situation exists.
    Thanks for the help so far and please feel free to keep suggesting ideas, but for reference I have tried:
    1. modifying settings in Firefox (although it does not matter what browser I use,the result is always the same)
    2. resetting the router and DSL modem
    3. modifying the /etc/hosts file on my Mac
    4. dscacheutil -flushcache
    5. using openDNS instead of my ISP (which is AT&T)
    6. removing the DNS settings and using the router settings
    7. turning off airport and back on after 30 seconds
    8. renewing my DHCP clients
    9. Signning onto a different wireless access point (which is actually a new ISP that I am going with and so they are a totally different network and subnet).. they are setup all over town with wireless access. -- pretty cool actually.
    None of this seems to fix the problem loading only my site. Since I do have access to the hosting provider (I work with them)... I have done some things on the hosting side too. All to no avail.

  • Error Only one expression can be specified in the expression list when the subquery is not intriduced. Please help

    Please help to fix this error
    SELECT    A.FLEETID,
    (SELECT   b.fleetid,SIZE,MAKE,PATTERN FROM ROQFLEETCHECK B
             WHERE  B.AxleNo=1  and B.AxleType = 'OFFSIDE OUTER' AND B.FLEETID = 1819 and B.fleetid =  A.fleetid) AS fleetList
    FROM ROQFLEETCHECK    AS A WHERE  a.FLEETID = 1819;
    Regards
    Pol
    polachan

    Hi,
    In addition to
    Naarasimha's answer. a small clarification: As much as the query optimizer the sub query "SELECT...
    FROM ROQFLEETCHECK B WHERE  ..."  might return more then one value and therefore it raise this error. What you can do, is limit
    the returned value to one, using "top 1" or aggregate function (as
    Naarasimha suggested).
      Ronen Ariely
     [Personal Site]    [Blog]    [Facebook]

  • Only one delivery to be allowed against one Sales order at item level

    Hi,
      I have a requirement  for some material in sales order if SO quanity is 25  we want that system should allow to create delivery of all 25 quanity one time  we try to use Max.Part.Deliv. at item level  by amking as 1  but system is juts giving the message and alowing to create multiple delivery,  can we map as per our requirement.
    regards,
    zafar

    Hello Zafar,
    your requirement of complete delivery required for some materials only, so it has to be taken care manually when user creates sale order, for those specific items complete delivery should be marked at item level (run availability check for the item and mark for complete delivery).
    If you want a permanent solution, please go for a development - define a table & maintain all the materials which are required to be delivered as complete delivery and then modify the sales order program, there is a specific include where the abaper can do this code change.
    Regards
    Suresh.

  • BADI "COPCMESSAGECONTROL" , only one active implementation ?

    Hi,
    I'd like to do a custom implementation of the BADI "COPCMESSAGECONTROL", eg
    "Z_COPCMESSAGECONTROL".
    For this BADI there's a SAP hint, that only one active implementation is allowed.
    Cause in our system there's already an active SAP implementation "/CWM/MESSAGE_CK" I don't know,
    if I can activate my custom "Z_COPCMESSAGECONTROL" implementation in addition to the SAP implementation.
    Any Ideas ? Many thanks in advance !
    Regards
    Olaf

    If you look at the BADI definition in SE18, you'll find that the 'multiple use' flag is NOT set meaning by default this BADI can only be implemented once.
    Therefore if you need to add custom coding to this BADI implementation either you add it to the implemented methods (modification) or you deactivate the standard BADI and implement your own BADI by copying the standard coding and adding yours to it (also a modification, but you would have your coding in a Z-class).
    However whenever you copy standard SAP code into a custom peogram or class any notes that SAP releases which makes changes to that BADI implementation will not be applied to your Z-copy!
    Hope that helps,
    Michael

  • Only one user at a time

    I'm looking for help.
    I have two user accounts on my iMac. Both have their own iTunes library file but these both reference to a shared store of music files (to avoid duplicates). I would now like to move this shared music to an external HDD attached to my TC.
    My problem is this. If user 1 first accesses the external HDD then when user 2 tries to do so there is a little red icon on the folder and permission is denied. If I disconnect all users from the TC and then retry with user 2 the problem is reversed. It seems to me that only one user account is allowed to access a TC external HDD at a time. Is there any way around this?
    In case anybody asks, my reason for moving the files is that I am hoping to buy a Sonos music system, which can read iTunes music from the TC as though it were an NAS, even if the computer is off.

    I think you're being misled a bit by the interface: the checkbox labelled "Strict locking" doesn't just allow strict locking, it requires it (and thus disallows byte-range locking). That is, with strict locking enabled, any client that tries to lock any part of the file actually locks the entire file. Access normally depends on byte-range locking to allow different clients to share the database (as long as they aren't trying to modify the same part of it at the same time), but with strict locking the first client locks all others out.

  • Error in view "IBO_WDC_INBOX.V_DEFAULT": Only one MessageArea UI Element is allowed to be visible

    Dear Team,
    In the control center, when i launch from SAP backend or select work overview button in the web UI it prompts for the error as below;
    The following error occurred in system XYZ : Error in view "IBO_WDC_INBOX.V_DEFAULT": Only one MessageArea UI Element is allowed to be visible
    Kindly suggest and advice.
    All the ACF's are activated as mentioned.
    Best Regards,
    Shashikumar BS

    What is your SAP version, including EHP and SP levels? See if SAP note 1818992 is relevant for your system and if it is make sure it is applied.

Maybe you are looking for